The present disclosure relates, in general, to the quality testing of composite components and more particularly concerns methods for making a composite specimen that can be used to produce a coupon for which can be used to test the characteristics of the composite laminate.
High strength composites in vertical lift aircraft such as rotorcraft can provide weight reduction and improved performance. Composites have been used for a wide range of components with complex geometry and complex laminate configurations. While composite materials have provided improvements in weight, strength, fatigue, and durability for rotorcraft components, composite components can be challenging to manufacture resulting in composite components with defects, e.g., wrinkles, voids, delamination, fiber pull-out, a foreign body, fiber misalignment, and undesirable waviness.
Managing fiber orientation to prevent wrinkles in composite laminates has presented challenges in manufacturing. A wrinkle is an out of plane distortion of the composite's fiber elements. In a laminate wrinkles can weaken the ability of the material to handle a tensile or compressive load, causing a reduction in strength. Composite laminates utilized in rotorcraft are typically made up of high strength fiberglass or carbon fibers in a resin matrix. Properly oriented in-plane fibers provide high tensile strength while the resin provides support and strength for all other loading directions. Fibers can be layered and oriented to meet a required stiffness and strength. When fibers in a laminate deviate (out of plane) from their intended layer and form a wrinkle, there is a strength reduction because the load in the fibers must transition up and around the defect. The more a fiber deviates out of plane, the less it is able to participate in load sharing with the adjacent fibers.
Wrinkles come in many shapes and sizes.
Due to wide variety of shapes and sizes, wrinkles can be difficult to characterize. Three exemplary characteristics that can be used to characterize wrinkles include: wrinkle type, wrinkle Aspect Ratio (AR), and wrinkle depth. An outward wrinkle, shown in
The wrinkle AR is the ratio of wrinkle height to the wrinkle width and measures the severity of the wrinkle. Examples of two different AR's for inward wrinkles are presented in
Another characteristic is the wrinkle depth parameter, as shown in
Composite structures with wrinkles and/or other defects have been tested in the past using costly and tedious processes. The past methods often test full scale parts with defects (“discrepant parts”) or subscale parts with inclusions. The full-scale parts are costly and can prove non-conservative as defect and wrinkle location and severity cannot be fully controlled. The subscale parts with inclusions method may simulate ply distortion through a thick laminate but the additional material and subsequent effects through the laminate do not complete represent detrimental effects seen in wrinkled parts. Moreover, these methods generate wrinkles of uncontrollable and inconsistent size and shape resulting in varying severity, occurrence, and distribution. The past methods for producing full scale and subscale parts are typically not representative of real production defects and can be costly and time consuming to manufacture.
Defects in composite components can be difficult to eliminate from the manufacturing process. The occurrence of seemingly random or periodic defects on an assembly line can lead to increased scrap rates, slowed production rates, increased testing requirements, and prolonged manufacturing development time—all of which increase cost.
There is a need for improved methods of making composite specimens with a predetermined wrinkle defect, methods of testing a tubular composite specimen with a defect, and methods of determining allowable defects for a composite component with a defect.
In a first aspect, there is a method of making a tubular specimen with a predetermined wrinkle defect including: providing a layup tool with a cavity forming member having a cavity which resembles a desired shape of the at least one wrinkle; orienting a composite material around the mandrel at a wrap angle to form a closed loop; and generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic in a portion of the closed loop to form a tubular specimen. The predetermined characteristic is at least one of the following: wrinkle location, an outward wrinkle, an inward wrinkle, a wrinkle width, a wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length.
In an embodiment, the cavity is a slot in a forming surface of the layup tool.
In one embodiment, the layup tool is a mandrel.
In another embodiment, the cavity is a slot that extends around the mandrel.
In yet another embodiment, the method includes positioning a wrinkle tool on the closed loop to form a primitive wrinkle. The generating at least one wrinkle step includes deforming a portion of the closed loop around the wrinkle tool to create a wrinkle.
In an embodiment, the wrinkle tool mates with the cavity in the cavity forming member.
In another embodiment, the generating at least one wrinkle step includes curing the closed loop.
In yet another embodiment, the curing step includes compacting the closed loop with a cure tool.
In still another embodiment, after the generating a wrinkle step, the specimen includes an unwrinkled portion adjacent to the wrinkled portion.
In a second aspect, there is a method of making a tubular specimen with a predetermined wrinkle defect including: providing a mandrel; orienting a composite material around the mandrel at a wrap angle to form a closed loop; positioning a wrinkle tool on the closed loop; generating at least one wrinkle by deforming a portion of the closed loop around the wrinkle tool to form a primitive wrinkle in the closed loop; and curing the closed loop to form a tubular specimen. The predetermined characteristic is at least one of the following: an outward wrinkle, an inward wrinkle, a wrinkle width, a wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length.
In a third aspect, there is a method of offset load testing a tubular composite specimen having at least one defect, the method including: providing a testing apparatus having a pair of arms including a fixed arm and a mobile arm; providing the tubular composite specimen with a top portion with a first pair of aligned holes and bottom portion with a second pair of aligned holes; securing the pair of arms using a fastener assembly in each of the first and second pair of aligned holes in the tubular specimen; and moving the mobile arm to impart an offset load force to the tubular specimen.
In an embodiment, the test apparatus is at least one of the following: a tensile testing machine, a compressive testing machine, and a tension-torsion testing machine.
In one embodiment, the defect is at least one of the following: a wrinkle, a delamination, a void, a fiber pull-out, a foreign body, a fiber misalignment, a marcelle, and impact damage.
In another embodiment, the method includes generating at least one defect in the tubular specimen with a predetermined characteristic.
In still another embodiment, the fastener assembly in the securing step is oriented generally about 90 degrees from the longitudinal axis of the mobile arm.
In yet another embodiment, the fastener assembly includes a round rod and a securing fastener.
In an embodiment, the moving of the mobile arm bends the tubular specimen.
In a fourth aspect, there is a method of offset load testing a tubular composite specimen having at least one defect, the method including: providing a testing apparatus having a pair of arms including a fixed arm and a mobile arm; providing the tubular composite specimen with a top portion and a bottom portion; securing the pair of arms to the top and bottom portions of the tubular composite specimen; and moving the mobile arm to impart an offset load force to the tubular composite specimen.
In an embodiment, the securing step includes connecting a fastening assembly to each of the top and bottom portions of the tubular composite specimen.
In a fifth aspect, there is a method of determining allowable defects for a composite component including: identifying at least one wrinkle characteristic of a composite component wrinkle defect; making a first plurality of tubular specimens each having a predetermined wrinkle defect representative of the composite component wrinkle defect; measuring each of the predetermined wrinkle defects in the first plurality of tubular specimens for at least one performance metric to generate performance data; and generating an allowable wrinkle defect profile based on the performance data from the first plurality of tubular specimens.
In an embodiment, the step of measuring is uses the methods of offset loading a specimen described herein.
In another embodiment, the predetermined wrinkle defect has at least one predetermined physical characteristic representative of a physical characteristic of the composite component wrinkle defect.
In one embodiment, the predetermined physical characteristic and physical characteristic are each at least one of the following: a wrinkle shape, a wrinkle width, a wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length.
Other aspects, features, and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are a part of this disclosure and which illustrate, by way of example, principles of the inventions disclosed.
The novel features believed characteristic of the embodiments of the present disclosure are set forth in the appended claims. However, the embodiments themselves, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Illustrative embodiments of the apparatus and method are described below. In the interest of clarity, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction.
Referring now to
The methods and systems of the present disclosure relate to methods of making composite specimens, methods of offset load testing of composite specimens, and methods of determining allowable defects for a composite component with a defect, such as a rotorcraft composite component or structure. It should be appreciated that rotorcraft 101 is merely illustrative as one of the many different types of aircraft whose composite components can benefit from the methods of the present disclosure. Furthermore, other aircraft can include, fixed wing aircraft, hybrid aircraft, unmanned aircraft, tiltrotor aircraft, to name a few examples. Moreover, composite components used in land, sea, and medical applications can benefit from the methods of the present disclosure.
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the fibers can be pre-impregnated with an un-cured resin. The resin can be a polymeric matrix or any suitable resin system, such as a thermosetting resin. Other exemplary resins can include epoxy, polyimide, polyamide, bismaleimide, polyester, vinyl ester, phenolic, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherketone (PEK), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), and the like. It should be appreciated that even though the methods herein are described with resin impregnated fibers, other composite manufacturing processes may be used. For example, a resin transfer molding process, which involves fibers, being placed in a selected pattern within a mold and resin is transferred into the mold such that the fibers and resin are combined, and then cured.
It will be appreciated that the embodiments described herein illustrate specimens with a predetermined wrinkle defect made from composite materials. In other embodiments, specimens and components made from metallic materials, polymeric materials, and other materials having wrinkle defects and other manufacturing defects can use and benefit from the methods and systems in the present disclosure.
The method 200 can include a step 201 of providing a layup tool, a step 203 of orienting a composite material around a layup tool at a wrap angle to form a closed loop, a step 205 of generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic in a portion of the closed loop to form a specimen, a step 207 of curing the specimen, and a step 209 of cutting coupons from the specimen. In an embodiment, the predetermined characteristic can include at least one of the following: a wrinkle location, an outward wrinkle, an inward wrinkle, a wrinkle width, wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length. The method 200 can advantageously provide a specimen that can be used to test edge effect defects. Each of these steps are described herein in further detail.
The step 201 of providing a layup tool can be a mold or mandrel of a suitable shape. In some embodiments, the layup tool has a generally rectangular, cuboid, or tubular shape.
The step 203 includes orienting a composite material around the layup tool to form a closed loop. In one embodiment, the composite material may comprise numerous plies of fabric and/or tape and a user or a machine can direct the plies to be laid down or wrapped around the layup tool to form a closed loop. In other embodiments, the composite material can be laid down in other configurations, for example, and not limitation, a tubular shape, and a rectangular shape. The composite material plies may form a plurality of plies having a substantially homogeneous height, weight, and length. In some embodiments, a glue may be applied above each ply and subsequently cured such that a layer of glue separates each pair of consecutive plies.
The user can control the orientation of the fibers in each ply when laying down each ply of fabric and/or tape. The step 203 of orienting a composite material around the layup tool at a wrap angle, which can be a fiber orientation angle. The fiber orientation angle can be associated with each ply of fabric and/or tape and may comprise any value. In one embodiment, the first ply comprises a fiber orientation angle of +45 degrees and the second ply comprises a fiber orientation angle of −45 degrees. In an embodiment, a third ply comprises a fiber orientation angle of 0 degrees. The plurality of plies can have the same or different fiber orientation angles associated with the other plies. The various angles of the several fiber orientation angles may be arranged in a repeating pattern. The fiber orientation angles described herein are merely exemplary and can be arranged in an infinite number of configurations.
The step 205 of generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic can be accomplished with a variety of devices that can impart tension from a first point on the closed loop to second point on the closed loop. In one embodiment, a stretcher is configured to generate at least one predetermined wrinkle in the closed loop.
In one embodiment, the step 205 of generating at least one wrinkle defect can produce wrinkles as shown in
In one implementation, the step 205 for generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic can include a stretcher that imparts tension between two points on or in the closed loop. In one embodiment, the stretcher can include an actuating mechanism in mechanical communication with a first arm and second arm. In step 211 the stretcher can be positioned such that the first and second arms are each in either the top or bottom portion of the closed loop. In step 213 at least one of the first and second arms is moved to generate at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic. In an exemplary embodiment, the stretcher with an actuating mechanism is shown in
In another embodiment, step for 205 for generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic can include the step of removing 221 the layup tool, the step of positioning 223 a stretcher in the hollow portion of the closed loop, and the step of moving 225 an expansion member to impart deformation to a portion of the closed loop. In an exemplary embodiment, the stretcher with an expansion member is shown in
Step 205 of generating at least one wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic in the closed loop forms the specimen. The generation of the wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic can have one of many characteristics including at least one of the following: a wrinkle location, an outward wrinkle, an inward wrinkle, a wrinkle width, a wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length. In an embodiment, the step 205 of generating at least one wrinkle generates a plurality of wrinkles.
Once the specimen is formed with at least one wrinkle having a predetermined characteristic, the specimen is cured in step 207 and then cut into coupons in step 209 for measuring various properties of the specimen. In an embodiment, the at least one wrinkle is filled with a resin similar to the manufacture of a composite component.
A stretcher 236 can be proved in step 235 that includes an actuating mechanism 236m in mechanical communication with a first arm 236a and a second arm 236b. The first and second arms 236a, 236b can be a portion of frame 236f that is in mechanical communication with the actuating mechanism 236m. In an embodiment, the actuation mechanism can be a tensile test machine or tension load frame.
The step 237 of generating a wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic in a portion of the closed loop to form a specimen 238 can include positioning the first arm 236a in the top arcuate portion 234a of the closed loop and a second arm 236b in the bottom arcuate portion 234b. The actuating mechanism 236m mechanically moves at least one of the first arm 236a and the second arm 236b sufficient to form at least one wrinkle 240 in the closed loop 234 to form a specimen 238. In an exemplary embodiment, the actuating mechanism 236m moved the first arm 236a 0.5 inches and the second arm 236b 0.0 inches, which resulted in the desired outward wrinkles 240 in an area having a width of up to 12 inches and depth of up to 8 inches.
Once the specimen 238 is formed, the specimen 238 can be cut into a flat specimen 238 in step 239 and cured in step 241. In an embodiment, a plurality of coupons 244 including a portion of the at least one wrinkle 240 with a predetermined characteristic are there identified in the flat specimen 238a and cut in step 243. The coupons then undergo measurement for various physical and structural properties that can be related to performance of a composite component with a defect.
Referring now to
A stretcher 256 can be provided in step 255 that includes an expansion member 256t in mechanical communication with an actuating mechanism 256m. In an embodiment, the stretcher 256 can be a pneumatic actuator or air cylinder. The expansion member 256t includes a head portion 256h.
The step 257 of generating a wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic in a portion of the closed loop 254 to form a specimen 258 can include positioning the stretcher 256 in the hollow portion 254h such that the expansion member 256t contacts an interior surface 254i of the closed loop 254. The actuating mechanism 256m moves the expansion member 256t sufficient to impart deformation to the closed loop 254 thereby generating at least one wrinkle having a predetermined characteristic in a portion of the closed loop 254 to form a specimen 258. In an embodiment, the expansion member 256t moves 0.5 inches in an upwards direction to generate a plurality of outward wrinkles 260a having a width of up to 3 inches and depth of up to 8 inches.
In one embodiment, the expansion member 256t can have an outer dimensional shape that generates a wrinkle with a predetermined characteristic. The outer dimensional shape of the head portion 256h of the expansion member 256t can surprisingly impart desired shapes to a plurality of wrinkles 260a. For example, as shown in
In an embodiment, the specimen 258 can include an unwrinkled portion 258a adjacent to the wrinkle 260. In an embodiment, the unwrinkled portion 258a are layers adjacent to and above or below the wrinkle 260. In one embodiment, there is included an additional step of adding unwrinkled composite material to the specimen 258, which can be used to tailor the specimen to be representative of a composite component defect, which is described in further detail herein.
Once the specimen 258 is formed, the stretcher 256 is removed in step 259, the specimen 258 is cut into a flat specimen 258b in step 261, and the specimen is cured in step 263. In an embodiment, a plurality of coupons 264 including a portion of the at least one wrinkle 260, 260′ with a predetermined characteristic are identified in the flat specimen 258a and cut in step 265. The plurality of coupons 264 then undergo measurement for various physical and structural properties that can be related to performance of and representative of a composite component with a wrinkle defect, which is described in further detail herein.
In another embodiment, shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the coupons 244, 264, 278 each have wrinkle 240, 260, 280 with a predetermined characteristic that can be characterized and measured quantitively and qualitatively. The coupons 244, 264, 278 can each be fabricated using the methods shown in
Regarding the methods shown in
Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is an optical (non-contact) true full-field approach that can be used to map stress levels on the free edge of the coupon 244, 264 during tensile testing. DIC imaging allows for further understanding of failure mechanisms and interlaminar stresses. An embodiment includes measuring tension or tensile strain, inter-laminar tension, inter-laminar shear, and other physical and functional properties of the wrinkle defect in the coupon 244, 264 using DIC imaging or other conventional equipment. Tension loads in the composite in the dominant direction of the fiber in the testing apparatus 290, as shown in
In an embodiment, after the data from the DIC images is assessed, a wrinkle or a plurality of wrinkles having a predetermined characteristics in the coupons 244, 246 can be evaluated using finite element analysis (FEA). A generic FEA model can be developed with the equivalent AR or other characteristic as shown in the DIC images. Fiber distortion can be modeled using FEA as it progresses similarly to the images shown in
The performance data can be used to generate an allowable wrinkle defect profile based on coupons 244, 264 from a plurality of specimens. In an embodiment, standard A basis statistical confidence can be applied to the standard deviation of the performance data, which can produce a curve that captures the ultimate strength of the wrinkles with a high degree of confidence. From there, the ultimate strength can be reduced by an applicable limit factor based on component use or certification authority. In one embodiment, a limit strength curve can be used to evaluate the strength reduction in a discrepant part and determine a structural margin of safety. These curves are specific to laminate coupon thickness and the laminate material tested and can be used to generate an allowable wrinkle defect profile.
In an embodiment, relating to the exemplary embodiments in
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the method 300 is a method of making a tubular composite specimen with a predetermined wrinkle defect from a composite material can be as described herein with respect to method 200 without the step 209 of cutting the coupons.
The step 301 can include providing a layup tool 302. The step 301 can further include the step 301 of providing a cavity forming member 302m onto or into the layup tool 302. In one embodiment, the layup tool 302 can have a tubular mandrel shape with a cavity forming member 302m and a forming surface 302f. The cavity forming member 302m can be integral to and formed into the layup tool 302, as shown in
In an embodiment, the step 301 of providing a layup tool 302 does not include providing a cavity forming member 302m. This embodiment can be used when the wrinkle to be generated is not on the interior surface of the tubular specimen 314 and instead is located on an exterior surface of the tubular specimen 314.
The step 303 includes orienting a composite material at a wrap angle around the layup tool to form a closed loop can be as described with respect to method 200. In an embodiment, the composite material includes 24 plies having 6 sets of plies at the following wrap angles: a −45 degrees ply, a +45 degrees ply, a 0 degrees ply, and a 90 degrees ply. The closed loop 304 can have a generally circular cross-sectional shape. In other embodiments, the closed loop 304 can have an elliptical, oval, flat oval, or other generally tubular cross-sectional shape.
The step 305 can include positioning a wrinkle tool 306 on the closed loop 304. In an embodiment, the wrinkle tool 306 is a piece of wire temporarily adhered to a surface of the closed loop 304 as shown in
In an embodiment, the step 307 of removing the layup tool 302 can include blowing closed loop 304 with air from the forming surface 302f of the layup tool 302.
In embodiment, the step 309 of generating at least one wrinkle 316 can include a step 305 of deforming a portion of the closed loop 304 around the wrinkle tool 306 to create an imprint of the wrinkle tool in the closed loop 304 that is identified as a primitive wrinkle 316p; and/or a step 311 of curing the closed loop to generate at least one wrinkle 316. The step 311 of curing can include compacting the closed loop 304 with a cure tool 312. In an embodiment, the compacting of the closed loop 304 with the cure tool 312 forms the wrinkle 316 with a predetermined characteristic in the specimen 314. The cure tool 312 can be a mold or other shape controlling apparatus used during the curing 311 step.
In an embodiment, after the generating a wrinkle step 309, the specimen 314 includes an unwrinkled portion 314u adjacent to the wrinkled portion. In an embodiment shown in
It will be appreciated that the contemplated embodiment shown in
A system 329 and method 330 of offset load testing a tubular composite specimen 334 having at least one wrinkle defect 356 are shown in
The method 330 of offset load testing a tubular composite specimen 334 can include the following steps: a step 331 of providing a testing apparatus 340 having a pair of arms 342 including a mobile arm 342a and a fixed arm 342b; a step 333 of providing the tubular composite specimen 334 with a top portion 334a and a bottom portion 334b; a step 335 of securing the pair of arms 342 to the top 334a and bottom portion 334b of the tubular specimen 334; and the step 337 of moving the mobile arm 342a to impart an offset load force F to the tubular specimen 334.
An embodiment advantageously provides that the testing apparatus 340 can be a standard tensile and/or compressive testing machine, or a multiple-axis testing machine, e.g. a tension-torsion testing machine. The testing apparatus 340 includes an actuating mechanism 340m mechanically connected to at least one of the pair of arms 342. In an embodiment, the actuating mechanism 340m moves the mobile arm 342a in an upward or downward direction.
In an embodiment, the tubular composite specimen 334 can include a tubular specimen 334s made according to the method 300 that includes at least one wrinkle defect 356 with a predetermined characteristic. The tubular composite specimen 334 can include top and bottom portions 334a, 334b with a plurality of reinforcement layers 338 around the tubular specimen 334s. The plurality of reinforcement layers 338 can be multiple woven fiberglass plies to structurally reinforce the tubular composite specimen 334 during the moving step 337. The plurality of reinforcement layers 338 prevent the tubular composite specimen 334 from bending in the top and bottom portions 334a, 334b during the moving step 337.
In an embodiment, the step 335 of securing the arms 342 to the tubular composite specimen 334 can include connecting a fastener assembly 350 to each of the top and bottom portions 334a, 334b of the tubular composite specimen 334. In one embodiment, shown in
The fastener assembly 350 is securely fastened to the top and bottom portions 334a, 334b of the tubular composite specimen 334. When the mobile arm 342a is connected to the top portion 334a and the mobile arm 342a is moved upward or downward, the upward or downward force causes the middle of the tubular composite specimen 334 to bend, which can cause bending forces at the wrinkle 356. The physical characteristics can be measured at the middle of the tubular composite specimen 334 to bend and the forces at the winkle 356 to generate performance metrics.
Method 330 can be practiced with a tubular composite specimen 334 including at least one of the following defects: a wrinkle, a delamination, a void, a fiber pull-out, a foreign body, a fiber misalignment, a marcelle, a waviness feature, and impact damage. A marcelle can be a ply waviness that can be several times the nominal ply thickness.
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the composite component can be a spar for a rotor blade, a rotor blade grip, a tiltrotor pylon support, a wing spar, and other composite components having manufacturing or repair defects.
In an embodiment, the method 400 further includes comparing the allowable wrinkle defect profile to the composite component wrinkle defect to assess the composite component wrinkle defect for at least one of the following: strength, stiffness, flaw growth, performance, structural integrity, and service life.
The method 400 in an embodiment can include the predetermined wrinkle defect having at least one predetermined physical characteristic representative of a physical characteristic of the composite component wrinkle. The predetermined physical characteristic and physical characteristic can each be similar and are each at least one of the following: a wrinkle location, an outward wrinkle, an inward wrinkle, a wrinkle width, a wrinkle height, and a wrinkle length.
In an embodiment, the measuring step 407 can include measuring at least one of the following: tension, inter-laminar tension, inter-laminar shear, compression, and bending.
In an embodiment, the performance metric is at least one of the following: strength, stiffness, and flaw growth.
In an embodiment, the method 400 can include using the allowable wrinkle defect profile to diagnose a repair. In one embodiment, the repair can be at least one of the following: a patch repair, a blend repair, a bond repair, a secondary bonded patch, and a scarf repair. A patch repair includes providing a patching material over a defect area. A blend repair involves improving properties of the composite component by removing material near or at the defect area. A scarf repair involves removing material to provide an exposed surface on or in the composite and adding material to the exposed area. A secondary bonded patch can be the joining together, by the process of adhesive bonding, two or more pre-cured composite parts, during which the chemical or thermal reaction occurring is the curing of the adhesive itself.
In a further embodiment, the method 400 can include using the allowable wrinkle defect profile for identification of a composite component wrinkle defect.
In yet another embodiment, the method 400 can include using the allowable wrinkle defect profile for identification of a definition of a composite component wrinkle defect.
In an embodiment, the composite component wrinkle defect is at least one of the following: a component in manufacturing, a damaged component, and a repaired component.
The allowable wrinkle defect profile can provide data for evaluating the modifications of a composite component that occur over time, environmental exposures, and in operation.
The method 400 can further include calculating a measure of variability in the performance data.
The method 400 can further include determining whether the composite component wrinkle defect meets the specified allowable wrinkle defect profile and rejecting from further processing any such composite component wrinkle defect which do not.
The method 400 can include tracking the composite component wrinkle defect.
In an embodiment, the method 400 can include applying a load to each of the predetermined wrinkle defects in the first plurality of specimens.
In an embodiment, the method 400 further includes making a second plurality of specimens each having a predetermined wrinkle defect representative of the composite component wrinkle defect; and measuring each of the predetermined wrinkle defects in the second plurality of specimens for at least one performance metric to generate performance data. The predetermined wrinkle defect in each of the second plurality of specimens can be different from the predetermined wrinkle defect in each of the first plurality of specimens. In another embodiment, the predetermined wrinkle defect in each of the second plurality of specimens is substantially similar to the predetermined wrinkle defect in each of the first plurality of specimens. In an embodiment, the second plurality of specimens are tubular specimens.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The methods and systems described herein can advantageously provide at least one of the following: an improved method of manufacturing consistent defects in composite specimens; an embodiment of the composite specimen with a predetermined wrinkle defect that can be tested in a conventional tensile testing machine, which provides greater standardization and does not require a custom testing machine; the ability to control the shape, size, severity, and other characteristics of a wrinkle defect in a composite specimen; and an industry standard for measuring effects of wrinkles and other defects; and for coupon level testing with representative attributes to an actual composite structure with a defect that is directly comparable to structural design allowables.
It will be appreciated that the embodiments are configured for wrinkle defects in composite components. In additional contemplated embodiments, the methods and systems described herein can be used for composite components having a composite component defect being at least one of the following: a wrinkle, a void, gross porosity, a delamination, a fiber pull-out, a foreign body, a fiber misalignment, an undesirable waviness feature, an in-plane fiber distortion (Marcel), missing plies, and impact damage. The methods of making specimens can be used to manufacture other non-wrinkle or wrinkle related defects. Accordingly, the predetermined defect in the specimen can have at least one predetermined physical characteristic representative of a physical characteristic of the composite component defect.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the disclosure. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principals of the disclosure and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the disclosure in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Such modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments as well as other embodiments will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/464,681, filed Mar. 21, 2017, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2454850 | Van Winkle | Nov 1948 | A |
2920480 | Haas | Jan 1960 | A |
3444728 | Burns | May 1969 | A |
3552193 | Belliveau | Jan 1971 | A |
3559469 | Stonebridge et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3621711 | Griffith et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3715916 | Stickney | Feb 1973 | A |
3885424 | Ryckman | May 1975 | A |
3916681 | Ryckman | Nov 1975 | A |
3938373 | Fletcher | Feb 1976 | A |
4031746 | Furuta | Jun 1977 | A |
4069088 | Cottam | Jan 1978 | A |
4574642 | Fleischman | Mar 1986 | A |
4662229 | Curtis | May 1987 | A |
4696707 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4780346 | Denoel | Oct 1988 | A |
4895027 | Manahan, Sr. | Jan 1990 | A |
4895750 | Pratt | Jan 1990 | A |
5054324 | Pohl | Oct 1991 | A |
5056370 | Maier | Oct 1991 | A |
5078843 | Pratt | Jan 1992 | A |
5275057 | Alexander | Jan 1994 | A |
5286108 | Whatley | Feb 1994 | A |
5292475 | Mead et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5374808 | Coultrip | Dec 1994 | A |
5388464 | Maddison | Feb 1995 | A |
5421207 | Carroll | Jun 1995 | A |
5431062 | Baratta | Jul 1995 | A |
5571357 | Darrieux et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5719339 | Hartman | Feb 1998 | A |
5797551 | Wirz | Aug 1998 | A |
5798463 | Doudican | Aug 1998 | A |
6267012 | McLaughlin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6460418 | Hiyoshi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7051600 | Cavallaro et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7150200 | Cavallaro | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7230421 | Goldfine | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7684596 | Watson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7770467 | Halderman | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8351053 | Kang | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365429 | Lawrence et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371036 | Lawrence | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8389222 | Breyer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8935888 | Dagher | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8950270 | Williams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9090042 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9109979 | Dietrich | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9222865 | Khonsari | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9389155 | Rabinovich | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9440401 | Nelson | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9476815 | Khonsari | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9513200 | Dubke | Dec 2016 | B1 |
10036766 | Graf | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10744727 | Burnett et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10746640 | Lee et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20020006523 | Obeshaw | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030024323 | Wang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054740 | Mansky | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030236637 | Noe | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000188 | Mach | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031337 | Masaniello | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040369 | Hoo Fatt | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050109124 | Greszczuk | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112304 | Hsu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050252304 | Woodward | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268728 | Phipps | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060162463 | Kawano | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070151359 | Broadley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175031 | Pham | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070277919 | Savol | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080148865 | Mlinar | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090007692 | Ferguson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057948 | Krogager | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098324 | Hasegawa | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166921 | Jacob | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199652 | Wilkinson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202767 | Booker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090235755 | Smallwood | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100009124 | Robins | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011873 | Kaneda | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100043957 | Baril | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100163174 | Calder et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110094307 | Seok | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120287248 | Erdman, III | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130112309 | Stewart | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129526 | Williams | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156979 | Stewart | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160257 | Feeney | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164473 | Feeney | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164492 | Hayse | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130188858 | Lin | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130298692 | Seok | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305833 | Kittur | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140060732 | Shair | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069203 | McColskey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069576 | Brown et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140127473 | Kline | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131914 | Gottinger | May 2014 | A1 |
20140288893 | Blom | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140352451 | Kismarton | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150030389 | Pollett | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150090047 | De Mattia | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150219539 | Mary | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255407 | Glacer | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160031164 | Downs et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054205 | O'Neill | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160139016 | Kismarton | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145747 | Watson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160282244 | Li | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160318632 | Froom et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160349160 | Esposito | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170350785 | Greaves | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180172568 | Krasnowski | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180272629 | Burnett | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275030 | Lee | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190011254 | Nielsen | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190242799 | Kuroda | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200331216 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2983956 | Aug 2020 | CA |
2983955 | Oct 2020 | CA |
3379230 | Sep 2018 | EP |
3379231 | Sep 2018 | EP |
3379230 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3379231 | Jul 2019 | EP |
3553492 | Oct 2019 | EP |
3557219 | Oct 2019 | EP |
3553492 | Aug 2020 | EP |
3557219 | Aug 2020 | EP |
S6089728 | May 1985 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Restriction Requirement, dated Jan. 18, 2018, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 15, 2018, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
Final Rejection, dated Jan. 23, 2019, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
Advisory Action, dated Apr. 9, 2019, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 25, 2019, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 15, 2020, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,681. |
CA Office Action, dated Oct. 5, 2018, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,956. |
CA Office Action, dated Jun. 3, 2019, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,956. |
CA Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 28, 2020, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,956. |
Partial European Search Report, dated May 2, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent Application No. 17197651.7. |
EP Communication with Search Report, dated Sep. 3, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 17197651.7. |
EP Exam Report, dated Sep. 18, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 17197651.7. |
EP Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC—Intention to Grant, by the EPO, dated Apr. 23, 2019, re EP Patent App No. 17197651 7. |
Decision to Grant, dated Jul. 4, 2019, by the EPO, re EP App No. 17197651.7. |
EP Search Report, dated Sep. 12, 2019, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 19179199.5. |
EP Exam Report, dated Sep. 24, 2019, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 19179199.5. |
EP Communication 71(3)—Intention to Grant, dated Apr. 15, 2020, by the EPO re EP App No. 19179199.5. |
Restriction Requirement, dated Jun. 7, 2019, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,822. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 30, 2019, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,822. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 22, 2020, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,822. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 6, 2020, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,822. |
CA Office Action, dated Oct. 9, 2018, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,955. |
CA Office Action, dated Jun. 3, 2019, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,955. |
CA Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 10, 2020, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 2,983,955. |
Partial European Search Report, dated May 2, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent Application No. 17197650.9. |
EP Communication with Search Report, dated Sep. 3, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 17197650.9. |
EP Exam Report, dated Sep. 18, 2018, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 17197650.9. |
EP Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC—Intention to Grant, by the EPO, dated Apr. 26, 2019, re EP Patent App No. 17197650.9. |
Decision to Grant, dated Jul. 4, 2019, by the EPO, re EP App No. 17197650.9. |
EP Search Report, dated Sep. 12, 2019, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 19178452.9. |
EP Exam Report, dated Sep. 24, 2019, by the EPO, re EP Patent App No. 19178452.9. |
EP Communication 71(3)—Intent to Granted, dated Apr. 15, 2020, by the EPO re EP App No. 19178452.9. |
Burnett et al.; Development of Allowables for Composite Wrinkles—Abstract; submitted Sep. 30, 2016. |
Burnett et al.; Development of Allowables for Composite Wrinkles—Abstract; submitted Mar. 27, 2017; presented at the AHS International 73rd Annual Forum & Technology Display; May 9-11, 2017. |
Amendment filed with the USPTO on Feb. 27, 2015, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 13/641,290. |
Canadian Office Action, dated Jun. 10, 2021, by the CIPO, re CA Patent App No. 3,081,196. |
Office Action—Restriction, dated Sep. 21, 2021, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 16/922,831. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 1, 2022, by the USPTO, re U.S. Appl. No. 16/922,831. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200340894 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15464681 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16923413 | US |