Patent Grant
7175786
A large number of glass and glass-ceramic materials are known. The majority of oxide glass systems utilize well-known glass-formers such as SiO2, B2O3, P2O5, GeO2, TeO2, As2O3, and V2O5 to aid in the formation of the glass. Some of the glass compositions formed with these glass-formers can be heat-treated to form glass-ceramics. The upper use temperature of glasses and glass-ceramics formed from such glass formers is generally less than 1200° C., typically about 700–800° C. The glass-ceramics tend to be more temperature resistant than the glass from which they are formed.
Although there are a variety of techniques for making the glass and glass-ceramic materials, additional novel techniques are desired.
The present invention provides methods of making glasses and glass-ceramics comprising Al2O3 and SiO2, utilizing particulate SiO2 source(s). Typically, glasses provided by a method according to the present invention have a Tg and a Tx, wherein Tx−Tg is at least 20K (in some embodiments, at least 25K).
In one exemplary method according to the present invention for making glass comprising at least 60 (in some embodiments, at least 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, or even at least 90) percent by weight Al2O3 and SiO2 in a range from 0.5 to 10 (in some embodiments, 0.5 to 5 or 1 to 3) percent by weight, and not more than 10 (in some embodiments, not more than 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, or even zero) percent by weight collectively As2O3, B2O3, GeO2, P2O5, SiO2, TeO2, and V2O5, based on the total weight of the glass, the method comprising:
In one exemplary method according to the present invention for making an article the method comprises:
In one exemplary method according to the present invention for making an article the method comprises:
Some embodiments of glass-ceramics according to the present invention may comprise glass in an amount, for example, of at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or even 100 percent by volume, based on the total volume of the glass-ceramic. Some embodiments of glass-ceramics according to the present invention may comprise crystalline ceramic in an amount, for example, of at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even 100 percent by volume, based on the total volume of the glass-ceramic.
In this application:
“amorphous material” refers to material derived from a melt and/or a vapor phase that lacks any long range crystal structure as determined by X-ray diffraction and/or has an exothermic peak corresponding to the crystallization of the amorphous material as determined by a DTA (differential thermal analysis) as determined by the test described herein entitled “Differential Thermal Analysis”;
“ceramic” includes glass, crystalline ceramic, glass-ceramic, and combinations thereof;
“complex metal oxide” refers to a metal oxide comprising two or more different metal elements and oxygen (e.g., CeAl11O18, Dy3Al5O12, MgAl2O4, and Y3Al5O12);
“complex Al2O3.metal oxide” refers to a complex metal oxide comprising, on a theoretical oxide basis, Al2O3 and one or more metal elements other than Al (e.g., CeAl11O18, Dy3Al5O12, MgAl2O4, and Y3Al5O12);
“complex Al2O3.Y2O3” refers to a complex metal oxide comprising, on a theoretical oxide basis, Al2O3 and Y2O3 (e.g., Y3Al5O12);
“complex Al2O3.REO” refers to a complex metal oxide comprising, on a theoretical oxide basis, Al2O3 and rare earth oxide (e.g., CeAl11O18 and Dy3Al5O12);
“glass” refers to amorphous material exhibiting a glass transition temperature;
“glass-ceramic” refers to ceramic comprising crystals formed by heat-treating glass;
“Tg” refers to the glass transition temperature as determined by the test described herein entitled “Differential Thermal Analysis”;
“Tx” refers to the crystallization temperature as determined by the test described herein entitled “Differential Thermal Analysis”;
“rare earth oxides” refers to cerium oxide (e.g., CeO2), dysprosium oxide (e.g., Dy2O3), erbium oxide (e.g., Er2O3), europium oxide (e.g., Eu2O3), gadolinium (e.g., Gd2O3), holmium oxide (e.g., Ho2O3), lanthanum oxide (e.g., La2O3), lutetium oxide (e.g., Lu2O3), neodymium oxide (e.g., Nd2O3), praseodymium oxide (e.g., Pr6O1), samarium oxide (e.g., Sm2O3), terbium (e.g., Tb2O3), thorium oxide (e.g., Th4O7), thulium (e.g., Tm2O3), and ytterbium oxide (e.g., Yb2O3), and combinations thereof; and
“REO” refers to rare earth oxide(s).
Further, it is understood herein that unless it is stated that a metal oxide (e.g., Al2O3, complex Al2O3.metal oxide, etc.) is crystalline, for example, in a glass-ceramic, it may be crystalline, or portions glass and portions crystalline. For example if a glass-ceramic comprises Al2O3 and ZrO2, the Al2O3 and ZrO2 may each be in an glass state, crystalline state, or portions in a glass state and portions in a crystalline state, or even as a reaction product with another metal oxide(s) (e.g., unless it is stated that, for example, Al2O3 is present as crystalline Al2O3 or a specific crystalline phase of Al2O3 (e.g., alpha Al2O3), it may be present as crystalline Al2O3 and/or as part of one or more crystalline complex Al2O3.metal oxides.
Some embodiments of glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be made, formed as, or converted into beads (e.g., beads having diameters of at least 1 micrometers, 5 micrometers, 10 micrometers, 25 micrometers, 50 micrometers, 100 micrometers, 150 micrometers, 250 micrometers, 500 micrometers, 750 micrometers, 1 mm, 5 mm, or even at least 10 mm), articles (e.g., plates), fibers, particles, and coatings (e.g., thin coatings). The beads can be useful, for example, in reflective devices such as retro-reflective sheeting, alphanumeric plates, and pavement markings. The particles and fibers are useful, for example, as thermal insulation, filler, or reinforcing material in composites (e.g., ceramic, metal, or polymeric matrix composites). The thin coatings can be useful, for example, as protective coatings in applications involving wear, as well as for thermal management. Examples of articles made according of the present invention include kitchenware (e.g., plates), dental brackets, and reinforcing fibers, cutting tool inserts, abrasive materials, and structural components of gas engines, (e.g., valves and bearings). Other articles include those having a protective coating of glass-ceramic on the outer surface of a body or other substrate. Certain glass-ceramic particles made according to the present invention can be particularly useful as abrasive particles. The abrasive particles can be incorporated into an abrasive article, or used in loose form.
Abrasive particles are usually graded to a given particle size distribution before use. Such distributions typically have a range of particle sizes, from coarse particles to fine particles. In the abrasive art this range is sometimes referred to as a “coarse”, “control” and “fine” fractions. Abrasive particles graded according to industry accepted grading standards specify the particle size distribution for each nominal grade within numerical limits. Such industry accepted grading standards (i.e., specified nominal grades) include those known as the American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI) standards, Federation of European Producers of Abrasive Products (FEPA) standards, and Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) standards. In one aspect, the present invention provides a plurality of abrasive particles having a specified nominal grade, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of abrasive particles are abrasive particles made according to the present invention. In some embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or even 100 percent by weight of the plurality of abrasive particles are the abrasive particles made according to the present invention, based on the total weight of the plurality of abrasive particles.
In another aspect, the present invention provides abrasive particles comprising a glass-ceramic made according to the present invention (including glass-ceramic abrasive particles). The present invention also provides a plurality of abrasive particles having a specified nominal grade, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of abrasive particles are abrasive particle made according to the present invention. In another aspect, the present invention provides an abrasive article (e.g., a bonded abrasive article, a non-woven abrasive article, or a coated abrasive article) comprising a binder and a plurality of abrasive particles, wherein at least a portion of the abrasive particles are the abrasive particles made according to the present invention.
Abrasive articles according to the present invention comprise binder and a plurality of abrasive particles, wherein at least a portion of the abrasive particles are the abrasive particles made according to the present invention. Exemplary abrasive products include coated abrasive articles, bonded abrasive articles (e.g., wheels), non-woven abrasive articles, and abrasive brushes. Coated abrasive articles typically comprise a backing having first and second, opposed major surfaces, and wherein the binder and the plurality of abrasive particles form an abrasive layer on at least a portion of the first major surface.
In some embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or even 100 percent by weight of the abrasive particles in an abrasive article are the abrasive particles made according to the present invention, based on the total weight of the abrasive particles in the abrasive article.
The present invention also provides a method of abrading a surface, the method comprising:
The present invention pertains to methods of making glasses and glass-ceramics comprising Al2O3 and SiO2. The glasses are prepared by selecting the raw materials for the desired composition, and the processing technique(s).
Some embodiments of glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention have x, y, and z dimensions each perpendicular to each other, and wherein each of the x, y, and z dimensions is at least 1, 5, 10, 25 micrometers (in some embodiments, at least 30 micrometers, 35 micrometers, 40 micrometers, 45 micrometers, 50 micrometers, 75 micrometers, 100 micrometers, 150 micrometers, 200 micrometers, 250 micrometers, 500 micrometers, 1000 micrometers, 2000 micrometers, 2500 micrometers, 1 mm, 5 mm, or even at least 10 mm).
Sources, including commercial sources, of (on a theoretical oxide basis) Al2O3 include bauxite (including both natural occurring bauxite and synthetically produced bauxite), calcined bauxite, hydrated aluminas (e.g., boehmite, and gibbsite), aluminum, Bayer process alumina, aluminum ore, gamma alumina, alpha alumina, aluminum salts, aluminum nitrates, and combinations thereof. The Al2O3 source may contain, or only provide, Al2O3. Alternatively, the Al2O3 source may contain, or provide Al2O3, as well as one or more metal oxides other than Al2O3 (including materials of or containing complex Al2O3 metal oxides (e.g., Dy3Al5O12, Y3Al5O12, CeAl11O18, etc.)).
Sources, including commercial sources, of particulate SiO2 include fumed silicas, fused silicas, sand, silica sols, silica gels, sodium silicate, silicate minerals (e.g., talc), ores, and silicon).
Sources, including commercial sources, of rare earth oxides include rare earth oxide powders, rare earth metals, rare earth-containing ores (e.g., bastnasite and monazite), rare earth salts, rare earth nitrates, and rare earth carbonates. The rare earth oxide(s) source may contain, or only provide, rare earth oxide(s). Alternatively, the rare earth oxide(s) source may contain, or provide rare earth oxide(s), as well as one or more metal oxides other than rare earth oxide(s) (including materials of or containing complex rare earth oxide-other metal oxides (e.g., Dy3Al5O12, CeAl11O18, etc.)).
Sources, including commercial sources, of (on a theoretical oxide basis) Y2O3 include yttrium oxide powders, yttrium, yttrium-containing ores, and yttrium salts (e.g., yttrium carbonates, nitrates, chlorides, hydroxides, and combinations thereof). The Y2O3 source may contain, or only provide, Y2O3. Alternatively, the Y2O3 source may contain, or provide Y2O3, as well as one or more metal oxides other than Y2O3 (including materials of or containing complex Y2O3.metal oxides (e.g., Y3Al5O12)).
Sources, including commercial sources, of (on a theoretical oxide basis) ZrO2 include zirconium oxide powders, zircon sand, zirconium, zirconium-containing ores, and zirconium salts (e.g., zirconium carbonates, acetates, nitrates, chlorides, hydroxides, and combinations thereof). In addition, or alternatively, the ZrO2 source may contain, or provide ZrO2, as well as other metal oxides such as hafnia. Sources, including commercial sources, of (on a theoretical oxide basis) HfO2 include hafnium oxide powders, hafnium, hafnium-containing ores, and hafnium salts. In addition, or alternatively, the HfO2 source may contain, or provide HfO2, as well as other metal oxides such as ZrO2.
For embodiments comprising ZrO2 and HfO2, the weight ratio of ZrO2:HfO2 may be in a range of 1:zero (i.e., all ZrO2; no HfO2) to zero:1, as well as, for example, at least about 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, and 5 parts (by weight) ZrO2 and a corresponding amount of HfO2 (e.g., at least about 99 parts (by weight) ZrO2 and not greater than about 1 part HfO2) and at least about 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 20, 15, 10, and 5 parts HfO2 and a corresponding amount of ZrO2.
Sources, including commercial sources, of other metal oxides (e.g., BaO, CaO, Cr2O3, CuO, CoO, Fe2O3, GeO2, HfO2, Li2O, MgO, MnO, NiO, Na2O, Sc2O3, SrO, TiO2, ZnO, ZrO2, and combinations thereof) which may be incorporated into the glasses or glass-ceramics include the oxides themselves, metal powders, complex oxides, ores, carbonates, acetates, nitrates, chlorides, hydroxides, etc.
In some embodiments, it may be advantageous for at least a portion of a metal oxide source (in some embodiments, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or even 100 percent by weight) to be obtained by adding particulate, metallic material comprising at least one of a metal (e.g., Al, Ca, Cu, Cr, Fe, Li, Mg, Ni, Ag, Ti, Zr, and combinations thereof), M, that has a negative enthalpy of oxide formation or an alloy thereof to the melt, or otherwise combining them with the other raw materials. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the heat resulting from the exothermic reaction associated with the oxidation of the metal is beneficial in the formation of a homogeneous melt and resulting glass. For example, it is believed that the additional heat generated by the oxidation reaction within the raw material eliminates or minimizes insufficient heat transfer, and hence facilitates formation and homogeneity of the melt, particularly when forming glass particles with x, y, and z dimensions over 50 (over 100, or even over 150) micrometers. It is also believed that the availability of the additional heat aids in driving various chemical reactions and physical processes (e.g., densification, and spherodization) to completion. Further, it is believed for some embodiments, the presence of the additional heat generated by the oxidation reaction actually enables the formation of a melt, which otherwise is difficult or otherwise not practical due to high melting point of the materials. Further, the presence of the additional heat generated by the oxidation reaction actually enables the formation of glass that otherwise could not be made, or could not be made in the desired size range. Another advantage of the invention include, in forming the glasses, that many of the chemical and physical processes such as melting, densification and spherodizing can be achieved in a short time, so that very high quench rates may be achieved. For additional details, see co-pending application having U.S. Ser. No. 10/211,639, filed the Aug. 2, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In general, the metal oxide sources are fed into a flame to form a melt, desirably a homogenous melt, and then rapidly cooling the melt to provide glass.
Known techniques for combining such types of raw materials, desirably, to provide a substantially homogeneous mixture can be used. Alternatively, or in addition, the particle size of particulate raw materials can be reduced using known techniques. Examples of such techniques for combining raw materials together and reducing the particle size of particulate material include ball milling, mixing, tumbling and the like. The milling media in the ball mill may be metal balls, ceramic balls and the like. The ceramic milling media may be, for example, alumina, zirconia, silica, magnesia and the like. The ball milling may occur dry, in an aqueous environment, or in a solvent-based (e.g., isopropyl alcohol) environment. If the raw material batch contains metal powders, then it is generally desired to use a solvent during milling. This solvent may be any suitable material with the appropriate flash point and ability to disperse or dissolve the raw materials. The milling time may be from a few minutes to a few days, generally between a few hours to 24 hours. In a wet or solvent based milling system, the liquid medium is removed, typically by drying, so that the resulting mixture is typically homogeneous and substantially devoid of the water and/or solvent. If a solvent based milling system is used, during drying, a solvent recovery system may be employed to recycle the solvent. After drying, the resulting mixture may be in the form of a “dried cake”. This cake like mixture may then be broken up or crushed into the desired particle size prior to melting. Alternatively, for example, spray-drying techniques may be used. The latter typically provides spherical particulates of a desired oxide mixture. The precursor material may also be prepared by wet chemical methods including precipitation and sol-gel. Such methods will be beneficial if extremely high levels of homogeneity are desired.
Particulate raw materials are typically selected to have particle sizes such that the formation of a homogeneous melt can be achieved rapidly. Typically, raw materials with relatively small average particles size and narrow distributions are used for this purpose. Furthermore, when particulate material is fed in to a flame or plasma spray apparatus, to form the melt, it may be desirable for the particulate raw materials to be provided in a range of particle sizes. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that this maximizes the packing density and strength of the feed particles. If the raw material powders are too coarse, the feed and resulting melt particles may not have the desired composition or the uniformity. In general the coarsest raw material particles are smaller than the desired melt or glass particle sizes. Further, although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that raw material particles that are too coarse, tend to cause thermal and mechanical stresses in the feed particles, for example, during a flame forming or plasma spraying step. The end result in such cases is generally, fracturing of the feed particles in to smaller fragments, loss of compositional uniformity, loss of yield in desired glass particle sizes, or even incomplete melting as the fragments generally change their trajectories in a multitude of directions out of the heat source. Further, if the raw material powders are too small, they tend to be difficult and costly to handle.
For particulate raw material feed into the flame or plasma, the particles typically have a particle size less than 250, 200, 150 or even less than 100 micrometers. In embodiments utilizing particulate SiO2 source(s) typically have an average particle size in a range from 5 nm to 50 micrometers (in some embodiments, in a range from 10 nm to 20 micrometers, or even 15 nm to 1 micrometer), wherein at least 90 (in some embodiments, 95, or even 100) percent by weight of the particulate SiO2 source have at least one particle size in a range from 5 nm to 50 micrometers (or 10 nm to 20 micrometers, or 15 nm to 1 micrometer, respectively).
The glass is typically obtained by relatively rapidly cooling the molten material (i.e., the melt). The quench rate (i.e., the cooling time) to obtain the glass depends upon many factors, including the chemical composition of the melt, the glass-forming ability of the components, the thermal properties of the melt and the resulting glass, the processing technique(s), the dimensions and mass of the resulting glass, and the cooling technique. In general, relatively higher quench rates are required to form glasses comprising higher amounts of Al2O3 (i.e., greater than 75 percent by weight Al2O3), especially in the absence of known glass formers such as SiO2, B2O3, P2O5, GeO2, TeO2, As2O3, and V2O5. Similarly, it is more difficult to cool melts into glasses in larger dimensions, as it is more difficult to remove heat fast enough.
The quench rates achieved in making the glasses are believed to be higher than 103, 104, 105, or even 106° C./sec (i.e., a temperature drop of 1000° C. from a molten state in less than a second, less than a tenth of a second, less than a hundredth of a second or even less than a thousandth of a second, respectively). Techniques for cooling the melt include discharging the melt into a cooling media (e.g., high velocity air jets, liquids (e.g., cold water), metal plates (including chilled metal plates), metal rolls (including chilled metal rolls), metal balls (including chilled metal balls), and the like). Other cooling techniques known in the art include roll-chilling. Roll-chilling can be carried out, for example, by melting the metal oxide sources at a temperature typically 20–200° C. higher than the melting point, and cooling/quenching the melt by spraying it under high pressure (e.g., using a gas such as air, argon, nitrogen or the like) onto a high-speed rotary roll(s). Typically, the rolls are made of metal and are water-cooled. Metal book molds may also be useful for cooling/quenching the melt.
The cooling rate is believed to affect the properties of the quenched glass. For instance, glass transition temperature, density and other properties of glass typically change with cooling rates.
Rapid cooling may also be conducted under controlled atmospheres, such as a reducing, neutral, or oxidizing environment to maintain and/or influence the desired oxidation states, etc. during cooling. The atmosphere can also influence glass formation by influencing crystallization kinetics from undercooled liquid. For example, larger undercooling of Al2O3 melts without crystallization has been reported in argon atmosphere as compared to that in air.
In one technique for forming a melt using a flame, the metal oxide sources are fed (e.g., in the form of particles, sometimes referred to as “feed particles”) directly into a burner (e.g., a methane-air burner, an acetylene-oxygen burner, a hydrogen-oxygen burner, and like), and then quenched, for example, in water, cooling oil, air, or the like. Feed particles can be formed, for example, by grinding, agglomerating (e.g., spray-drying), melting, or sintering the metal oxide sources. Additional details regarding melt formation using a flame can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,254,981 (Castle), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Any of a variety of plasma spraying techniques may be suitable, including many known in the art. An exemplary plasma spray apparatus is diagrammatically illustrated in
Plasma spray gun 401 includes housing 403 having nozzle 402 located therein. Nozzle 402 forms nozzle bore 405 adapted to direct and focus plasma gas jet 416 in a delivery direction 418. To produce plasma gas jet 416, plasma spray gun 401 includes various electrodes. For example, in the illustrated embodiment of
Those of skill in the art will realize that this electrode configuration is merely exemplary and that other electrode configurations are certainly possible. For example, the polarity and/or material of the first and second electrodes may be different than that described above. Alternatively, for example, second electrode 402 may be independent of nozzle 402. In fact, most any electrode configuration that yields an acceptable plasma spray is possible without departing from the scope of the invention.
Arc gas inlet 414 may be provided to allow for the introduction of arc gas 410 into gas chamber 412 of housing 403. While most any gas complimentary to arc formation is potentially suitable, preferred arc gases include argon, helium, hydrogen, nitrogen, and combinations thereof.
One or more carrier conduits 420 may be formed in housing 403. As further described below, carrier conduits 420 may deliver particles 430 to plasma gas jet 416. While the actual geometry of carrier conduits 420 may vary, they are, in one embodiment, formed by holes drilled to intersect nozzle bore 405. In the illustrated embodiment, each carrier conduit 420 intersects bore 405 at or proximate the smallest diameter of bore 405.
One or more carrier conduits 420 are each preferably symmetric about conduit axis 422. Each conduit axis 422 may intersect jet axis 417 at angle 424 of 75 degrees or less, wherein one or more carrier conduits 420 diverge or extend away from jet axis 417 in delivery direction 418. In some embodiments, angle 424 is preferably 45 degrees to 75 degrees, and more preferably, 60 degrees to 75 degrees.
Other configurations of carrier conduits 420 are also possible without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, conduits 420 may have other (e.g., non-linear) shapes, or they may penetrate bore 405 at a point offset from its centerline. These and other conduit configurations are certainly possible if they are operable to direct particles within conduit 420 to plasma gas jet 416 along particle delivery vector 426, where: particle delivery vector 426 intersects jet axis 417 at angle 424 of 75 degrees or less; and the particle delivery vector 426 comprises vector component 426′ having a direction that is substantially opposite delivery direction 418. Once again, in some embodiments, angle 424 is preferably 45 degrees to 75 degrees, and more preferably, 60 degrees to 75 degrees.
Although the term “intersects” is used herein, those of skill in the art will realize that conduit axis 422 may not necessarily be coplanar with jet axis 417 (e.g., one may be skewed with respect to the other). In these instances, it is understood that “intersects” indicates angle 424 between the two axes when the axes are moved parallel to themselves to a common point of intersection.
Having described plasma gas jet 401 in detail, operation of the same in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is now described.
Arc gas 410 may be introduced into chamber 412 and accelerated through converging bore 405 of nozzle 402 as described above. When first electrode 404 and second electrode 402′ are coupled to respective terminals of a power supply, an electric field is created between first electrode 404 and nozzle 402. The resulting plasma gas jet 416 exits housing 403 in delivery direction 418 along jet axis 417, the latter which is substantially parallel and coaxial to axis 406 of nozzle 402. A cooling system, represented by arrows 408 in
To generate the desired spray of droplets 407, particles 430 are delivered to the plasma gas jet 416 through carrier conduits 420. In one embodiment, the particles 430 are entrained in a carrier gas that travels through carrier conduits 420 toward the nozzle bore 405. While nitrogen is preferred, other carrier gases may be used. When the metal oxide particles 430 reach plasma gas jet 416, at least a portion are at least partially liquefied to form the desired droplets 407. Droplets 407 may then be cooled and deposited on a substrate or otherwise collected.
By orienting carrier conduits 420 as shown and described herein, particles 430 achieve increased residence time within plasma gas jet 416. This longer residence time allows for the production of courser droplets 407 when compared to droplets produced by existing apparatus and methods.
Further with regard to generating a plasma and melting the raw materials (typically in the form of feed particles) a variety of DC, AC, RF plasma processing systems can be used. Suitable plasma systems useful for the invention typically have about 40 kW of power although smaller or larger systems may be useful depending, for example, on the production demands.
Gases for generating the plasma include those known in the art such as argon, helium, nitrogen, hydrogen, and mixtures thereof. Most commonly, argon gas is used as the plasma gas, but to increase the enthalpy (i.e., the heat content of the plasma, one or more of helium, hydrogen, or nitrogen) may also be added.
The raw materials (typically in the form of feed particles) are commonly introduced into the plasma by a carrier gas. Gases for delivering the raw materials to the plasma gas jet include argon, helium, nitrogen, and mixtures thereof. The carrier gas may be same as the plasma gas (i.e., argon) or it may provide the second or the third gas to modify the energetics of the plasma. The larger plasma jet size is beneficial, for example, because it tends to increased residence time of the raw materials in the plasma jet, and thus enhanced, often desirable heat transfer to the raw materials, which in turn tends to lead to more complete and homogeneous melt formation, and a denser and stronger plasma sprayed material. It is also possible, for example, to introduce the fed into the plasma along the axis of the plasma jet, for example, in the particulate form or as a feed stick (the feed material is formed in to a rod shape and is fed into the plasma slowly as the tip of the rod is molten and broken into droplets, which are then sprayed by the plasma jet.
In some embodiments, the raw materials can be introduced into the plasma just outside of the gun. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that feeding the raw materials into the plasma through an orifice machined in the anode of the plasma gun desirably increases the residence time or the interaction of the particles in the plasma. In another aspect, some cases, although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the residence time or the interaction of the raw materials in the plasma may be desirably changed (e.g., increased) by orienting the orifice towards the front or back of the gun at an angle (e.g., at least 10, 20 or 30 degrees, etc.).
In another aspect of the invention, the plasma processing may be carried out in air, in a blanket of gasses, at higher or lower pressures, even under vacuum.
The melt from the plasma is typically sprayed onto a substrate or into a liquid (e.g., water), although the liquid may also be on a substrate. The substrate or liquid aid in cooling the melt. In some cases, it is desirable to provide a coating onto a substrate. In other cases, the substrate may be merely serving to cool and collect material which is subsequently removed from the substrate (e.g., bulk material is provided). It is understood that then substrate is selected to be of sufficient integrity to withstand the heat from the plasma. Common substrate materials are metals and ceramics. With regard to using liquid to cool the plasma sprayed melt, the result is typically particulate, most commonly in the form of spheres or beads (e.g., in some embodiments having a diameter(s) in a range from about 1, to at least 150 micrometers).
For additional details regarding plasma spraying, see, for example, co-pending application having U.S. Ser. No. 10/211,640, filed Aug. 2, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Typically, glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention have x, y, and z dimensions each perpendicular to each other, and wherein each of the x, y, and z dimensions is at least 10 micrometers. In some embodiments, the x, y, and z dimensions is at least 30 micrometers, 35 micrometers, 40 micrometers, 45 micrometers, 50 micrometers, 75 micrometers, 100 micrometers, 150 micrometers, 200 micrometers, 250 micrometers, 500 micrometers, 1000 micrometers, 2000 micrometers, 2500 micrometers, 1 mm, 5 mm, or even at least 10 mm, if coalesced. The x, y, and z dimensions of a material are determined either visually or using microscopy, depending on the magnitude of the dimensions. The reported z dimension is, for example, the diameter of a sphere, the thickness of a coating, or the shortest dimension of a prismatic shape.
The addition of certain metal oxides may alter the properties and/or crystalline structure or microstructure of ceramics made according to the present invention, as well as the processing of the raw materials and intermediates in making the ceramic. For example, oxide additions such as CaO, Li2O, MgO, and Na2O have been observed to alter both the Tg and Tx (wherein Tx is the crystallization temperature) of glass. Although not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that such additions influence glass formation. Further, for example, such oxide additions may decrease the melting temperature of the overall system (i.e., drive the system toward lower melting eutectic), and ease of glass-formation. Complex eutectics in multi component systems (quaternary, etc.) may result in better glass-forming ability. The viscosity of the liquid melt and viscosity of the glass in its working range may also be affected by the addition of metal oxides other than the particular required oxide(s).
Crystallization of glasses to form glass-ceramics may also be affected by the additions of materials. For example, certain metals, metal oxides (e.g., titanates and zirconates), and fluorides may act as nucleation agents resulting in beneficial heterogeneous nucleation of crystals. Also, addition of some oxides may change the nature of metastable phases devitrifying from the glass upon reheating. In another aspect, for ceramics made according to the present invention comprising crystalline ZrO2, it may be desirable to add metal oxides (e.g., Y2O3, TiO2, CeO2, CaO, and MgO) that are known to stabilize tetragonal/cubic form of ZrO2.
The particular selection of metal oxide sources and other additives for making glasses and glass-ceramics described herein typically takes into account, for example, the desired composition, the microstructure, the degree of crystallinity, the physical properties (e.g., hardness or toughness), the presence of undesirable impurities, and the desired or required characteristics of the particular process (including equipment and any purification of the raw materials before and/or during fusion and/or solidification) being used to prepare the ceramics.
In some instances, it may be preferred to incorporate limited amounts of metal oxides selected from the group consisting of: Na2O, P2O5, SiO2, TeO2, V2O3, and combinations thereof. Sources, including commercial sources, include the oxides themselves, complex oxides, elemental (e.g., Si) powders, ores, carbonates, acetates, nitrates, chlorides, hydroxides, etc. These metal oxides may be added, for example, to modify a physical property of the resulting glass-ceramic and/or improve processing. These metal oxides when used are typically are added from greater than 0 to 20% by weight collectively (in some embodiments, greater than 0 to 10 (in some embodiments, greater than 0 to 5%) by weight collectively, or even greater than 0 to 2% by weight collectively) of the glass-ceramic depending, for example, upon the desired property.
The microstructure or phase composition (glassy/crystalline) of a material can be determined in a number of ways. Various information can be obtained using optical microscopy, electron microscopy, differential thermal analysis (DTA), and x-ray diffraction (XRD), for example.
Using optical microscopy, amorphous material is typically predominantly transparent due to the lack of light scattering centers such as crystal boundaries, while crystalline material shows a crystalline structure and is opaque due to light scattering effects.
A percent amorphous (or glass) yield can be calculated for particles (e.g., beads), etc. using a −100+120 mesh size fraction (i.e., the fraction collected between 150-micrometer opening size and 125-micrometer opening size screens). The measurements are done in the following manner. A single layer of particles, beads, etc. is spread out upon a glass slide. The particles, beads, etc. are observed using an optical microscope. Using the crosshairs in the optical microscope eyepiece as a guide, particles, beads, etc. that lay along a straight line are counted either amorphous or crystalline depending on their optical clarity. A total of 500 particles, beads, etc. are typically counted, although fewer particles, beads, etc. may be used and a percent amorphous yield is determined by the amount of amorphous particles, beads, etc. divided by total particles, beads, etc. counted. Embodiments of methods according to the have percent amorphous (or glass) yields of at least 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or even 100 percent.
If it is desired for all the particles to be amorphous (or glass), and the resulting yield is less than 100%, the amorphous (or glass) particles may be separated from the non-amorphous (or non-glass) particles. Such separation may be done, for example, by any conventional techniques, including separating based upon density or optical clarity.
Using DTA, the material is classified as amorphous if the corresponding DTA trace of the material contains an exothermic crystallization event (Tx). If the same trace also contains an endothermic event (Tg) at a temperature lower than Tx it is considered to consist of a glass phase. If the DTA trace of the material contains no such events, it is considered to contain crystalline phases.
Differential thermal analysis (DTA) can be conducted using the following method. DTA runs can be made (using an instrument such as that obtained from Netzsch Instruments, Selb, Germany under the trade designation “NETZSCH STA 409 DTA/TGA”) using a −140+170 mesh size fraction (i.e., the fraction collected between 105-micrometer opening size and 90-micrometer opening size screens). An amount of each screened sample (typically about 400 milligrams (mg)) is placed in a 100-microliter Al2O3 sample holder. Each sample is heated in static air at a rate of 10° C./minute from room temperature (about 25° C.) to 1100° C.
Using powder x-ray diffraction, XRD, (using an x-ray diffractometer such as that obtained under the trade designation “PHILLIPS XRG 3100” from Phillips, Mahwah, N.J., with copper K α1 radiation of 1.54050 Angstrom) the phases present in a material can be determined by comparing the peaks present in the XRD trace of the crystallized material to XRD patterns of crystalline phases provided in JCPDS (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards) databases, published by International Center for Diffraction Data. Furthermore, XRD can be used qualitatively to determine types of phases. The presence of a broad diffused intensity peak is taken as an indication of the amorphous nature of a material. The existence of both a broad peak and well-defined peaks is taken as an indication of existence of crystalline matter within a glass matrix.
The initially formed glass may be larger in size than that desired. If the glass is in a desired geometric shape and/or size, size reduction is typically not needed. The glass or glass-ceramic can be converted into smaller pieces using crushing and/or comminuting techniques known in the art, including roll crushing, jaw crushing, hammer milling, ball milling, jet milling, impact crushing, and the like. In some instances, it is desired to have two or multiple crushing steps. For example, after the ceramic is formed (solidified), it may be in the form of larger than desired. The first crushing step may involve crushing these relatively large masses or “chunks” to form smaller pieces. This crushing of these chunks may be accomplished with a hammer mill, impact crusher or jaw crusher. These smaller pieces may then be subsequently crushed to produce the desired particle size distribution. In order to produce the desired particle size distribution (sometimes referred to as grit size or grade), it may be necessary to perform multiple crushing steps. In general the crushing conditions are optimized to achieve the desired particle shape(s) and particle size distribution. Resulting particles that are not of the desired size may be re-crushed if they are too large, or “recycled” and used as a raw material for re-melting if they are too small.
The shape of particles can depend, for example, on the composition and/or microstructure of the ceramic, the geometry in which it was cooled, and the manner in which the ceramic is crushed (i.e., the crushing technique used). In general, where a “blocky” shape is preferred, more energy may be employed to achieve this shape. Conversely, where a “sharp” shape is preferred, less energy may be employed to achieve this shape. The crushing technique may also be changed to achieve different desired shapes. For some particles an average aspect ratio ranging from 1:1 to 5:1 is typically desired, and in some embodiments 1.25:1 to 3:1, or even 1.5:1 to 2.5:1.
It is also within the scope of the present invention, for example, to directly form articles in desired shapes. For example, desired articles may be formed (including molded) by pouring or forming the melt into a mold. Also see, for example, the forming techniques described in application having U.S. Ser. No. 10/358,772, filed the same date as the instant application, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments of ceramics made according to the present invention can be obtained without limitations in dimensions. This was found to be possible through a coalescing step performed at temperatures above glass transition temperature. This coalescing step in essence forms a larger sized body from two or more smaller particles. For instance, as evident from
In general, heat-treatment can be carried out in any of a variety of ways, including those known in the art for heat-treating glass to provide glass-ceramics. For example, heat-treatment can be conducted in batches, for example, using resistively, inductively or gas heated furnaces. Alternatively, for example, heat-treatment (or a portion thereof) can be conducted continuously, for example, using a rotary kiln, fluidized bed furnaces, or pendulum kiln. In the case of a rotary kiln or a pendulum kiln, the material is typically fed directly into the kiln operating at the elevated temperature. In the case of a fluidized bed furnace, the glass to be heat-treated is typically suspended in a gas (e.g., air, inert, or reducing gasses). The time at the elevated temperature may range from a few seconds (in some embodiments even less than 5 seconds) to a few minutes to several hours. The temperature typically ranges from the Tx of the glass to 1600° C., more typically from 900° C. to 1600° C., and in some embodiments, from 1200° C. to 1500° C. It is also within the scope of the present invention to perform some of the heat-treatment in multiple steps (e.g., one for nucleation, and another for crystal growth; wherein densification also typically occurs during the crystal growth step). When a multiple step heat-treatment is carried out, it is typically desired to control either or both the nucleation and the crystal growth rates. In general, during most ceramic processing operations, it is desired to obtain maximum densification without significant crystal growth. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, in general, it is believed in the ceramic art that larger crystal sizes lead to reduced mechanical properties while finer average crystallite sizes lead to improved mechanical properties (e.g., higher strength and higher hardness). In particular, it is very desirable to form ceramics with densities of at least 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even at least 100 percent of theoretical density, wherein the average crystal sizes are less than 0.15 micrometer, or even less than 0.1 micrometer.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the glasses or ceramics comprising glass may be annealed prior to heat-treatment. In such cases annealing is typically done at a temperature less than the Tx of the glass for a time from a few second to few hours or even days. Typically, the annealing is done for a period of less than 3 hours, or even less than an hour. Optionally, annealing may also be carried out in atmospheres other than air. Furthermore, different stages (i.e., the nucleation step and the crystal growth step) of the heat-treatment may be carried out under different atmospheres. It is believed that the Tg and Tx, as well as the Tx−Tg of glasses according to this invention may shift depending on the atmospheres used during the heat treatment.
One skilled in the art can determine the appropriate conditions from a Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) study of the glass using techniques known in the art. One skilled in the art, after reading the disclosure of the present invention should be able to provide TTT curves for glasses used to make glass-ceramics according to the present invention, determine the appropriate nucleation and/or crystal growth conditions to provide glass-ceramics according to the present invention.
Heat-treatment may occur, for example, by feeding the material directly into a furnace at the elevated temperature. Alternatively, for example, the material may be fed into a furnace at a much lower temperature (e.g., room temperature) and then heated to desired temperature at a predetermined heating rate. It is within the scope of the present invention to conduct heat-treatment in an atmosphere other than air. In some cases it might be even desirable to heat-treat in a reducing atmosphere(s). Also, for example, it may be desirable to heat-treat under gas pressure as in, for example, hot-isostatic press, or in gas pressure furnace. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that atmospheres may affect oxidation states of some of the components of the glasses and glass-ceramics. Such variation in oxidation state can bring about varying coloration of glasses and glass-ceramics. In addition, nucleation and crystallization steps can be affected by atmospheres (e.g., the atmosphere may affect the atomic mobilities of some species of the glasses).
It is also within the scope of the present invention to conduct additional heat-treatment to further improve desirable properties of the material. For example, hot-isostatic pressing may be conducted (e.g., at temperatures from about 900° C. to about 1400° C.) to remove residual porosity, increasing the density of the material.
It is within the scope of the present invention to convert (e.g., crush) the resulting article or heat-treated article to provide particles (e.g., abrasive particles according to the present invention).
Typically, glass-ceramics are stronger than the glasses from which they are formed. Hence, the strength of the material may be adjusted, for example, by the degree to which the glass is converted to crystalline ceramic phase(s). Alternatively, or in addition, the strength of the material may also be affected, for example, by the number of nucleation sites created, which may in turn be used to affect the number, and in turn the size of the crystals of the crystalline phase(s). For additional details regarding forming glass-ceramics, see, for example, Glass-Ceramics, P. W. McMillan, Academic Press, Inc., 2nd edition, 1979, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
As compared to many other types of ceramic processing (e.g., sintering of a calcined material to a dense, sintered ceramic material), there is relatively little shrinkage (typically, less than 30 percent by volume; in some embodiments, less than 20 percent, 10 percent, 5 percent, or even less than 3 percent by volume) during crystallization of the glass to form the glass-ceramic. The actual amount of shrinkage depends, for example, on the composition of the glass, the heat-treatment time, the heat-treatment temperature, the heat-treatment pressure, the density of the glass being crystallized, the relative amount(s) of the crystalline phases formed, and the degree of crystallization. The amount of shrinkage can be measured by conventional techniques known in the art, including by dilatometry, Archimedes method, or measuring the dimensions of the material before and after heat-treatment. In some cases, there may be some evolution of volatile species during heat-treatment.
In some embodiments, the relatively low shrinkage feature may be particularly advantageous. For example, articles may be formed in the glass phase to the desired shapes and dimensions (i.e., in near-net shape), followed by heat treatment to at least partially crystallize the glass. As a result, substantial cost savings associated with the manufacturing and machining of the crystallized material may be realized.
In some embodiments, the glass has an x, y, z direction, each of which has a length of at least 1 cm (in some embodiments, at least 5 cm, or even at least 10 cm), wherein the glass has a volume, wherein the resulting glass-ceramic has an x, y, z direction, each of which has a length of at least 1 cm (in some embodiments, at least 5 cm, or even at least 10 cm), wherein the glass-ceramic has a volume of at least 70 (in some embodiments, at least 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 96, or even at least 97) percent of the glass volume.
For example, during heat-treatment of some exemplary glasses for making glass-ceramics, formation of phases such as La2Zr2O7, and, if ZrO2 is present, cubic/tetragonal ZrO2, in some cases monoclinic ZrO2, may occur at temperatures above about 900° C. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that zirconia-related phases are the first phases to nucleate from the glass. Formation of Al2O3, ReAlO3 (wherein Re is at least one rare earth cation), ReAl11O18, Re3Al5O12, Y3Al5O12, etc. phases are believed to generally occur at temperatures above about 925° C. Typically, crystallite size during this nucleation step is on order of nanometers. For example, crystals as small as 10–15 nanometers have been observed. For at least some embodiments, heat-treatment at about 1300° C. for about 1 hour provides a full crystallization. In general, heat-treatment times for each of the nucleation and crystal growth steps may range of a few seconds (in some embodiments even less than 5 seconds) to several minutes to an hour or more.
The average crystal size can be determined by the line intercept method according to the ASTM standard E 112-96 “Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size”. The sample is mounted in mounting resin (such as that obtained under the trade designation “TRANSOPTIC POWDER” from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill.) typically in a cylinder of resin about 2.5 cm in diameter and about 1.9 cm high. The mounted section is prepared using conventional polishing techniques using a polisher (such as that obtained from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill. under the trade designation “ECOMET 3”). The sample is polished for about 3 minutes with a diamond wheel, followed by 5 minutes of polishing with each of 45, 30, 15, 9, 3, and 1-micrometer slurries. The mounted and polished sample is sputtered with a thin layer of gold-palladium and viewed using a scanning electron microscopy (such as Model JSM 840A from JEOL, Peabody, Mass.). A typical back-scattered electron (BSE) micrograph of the microstructure found in the sample is used to determine the average crystallite size as follows. The number of crystallites that intersect per unit length (NL) of a random straight line drawn across the micrograph are counted. The average crystallite size is determined from this number using the following equation.
In another aspect, glass-ceramics made according to the present invention may comprise at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even 100 percent by volume crystallites, wherein the crystallites have an average size of less than 1 micrometer. In another aspect, glass-ceramics made according to the present invention may comprise at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even 100 percent by volume crystallites, wherein the crystallites have an average size of less than 0.5 micrometer. In another aspect, glass-ceramics made according to the present invention may comprise at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even 100 percent by volume crystallites, wherein the crystallites have an average size of less than 0.3 micrometer. In another aspect, made glass-ceramics according to the present invention may comprise at least 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, 98, 99, or even 100 percent by volume crystallites, wherein the crystallites have an average size of less than 0.15 micrometer.
Examples of crystalline phases which may be present in ceramics according to the present invention include: alumina (e.g., alpha and transition aluminas), REO (e.g., La2O3), Y2O3, MgO, one or more other metal oxides such as BaO, CaO, Cr2O3, CoO, Fe2O3, GeO2, Li2O, MnO, NiO, Na2O, P2O5, Sc2O3, SiO2, SrO, TeO2, TiO2, V2O3, ZnO, HfO2, ZrO2 (e.g., cubic ZrO2 and tetragonal ZrO2), as well as “complex metal oxides” (including complex Al2O3.metal oxide (e.g., complex Al2O3.REO)), complex Al2O3.metal oxide(s) (e.g., complex Al2O3.REO (e.g., ReAlO3 (e.g., GdAlO3 LaAlO3), ReAl11O18 (e.g., LaAl11O18,), and Re3Al5O12 (e.g., Dy3Al5O12)), complex Al2O3.Y2O3 (e.g., Y3Al5O12), and complex ZrO2.REO (e.g., La2Zr2O7)), and combinations thereof. Typically, ceramics according to the present invention are free of eutectic microstructure features.
It is also with in the scope of the present invention to substitute a portion of the aluminum cations in a complex Al2O3.metal oxide (e.g., complex Al2O3.REO and/or complex Al2O3.Y2O3 (e.g., yttrium aluminate exhibiting a garnet crystal structure)) with other cations. For example, a portion of the Al cations in a complex Al2O3.Y2O3 may be substituted with at least one cation of an element selected from the group consisting of: Cr, Ti, Sc, Fe, Mg, Ca, Si, Co, and combinations thereof. For example, a portion of the Y cations in a complex Al2O3.Y2O3 may be substituted with at least one cation of an element selected from the group consisting of: Ce, Dy, Er, Eu, Gd, Ho, La, Lu, Nd, Pr, Sm, Th, Tm, Yb, Fe, Ti, Mn, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Mg, Ca, Sr, and combinations thereof. Further, for example, a portion of the rare earth cations in a complex Al2O3.REO may be substituted with at least one cation of an element selected from the group consisting of: Y, Fe, Ti, Mn, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Mg, Ca, Sr, and combinations thereof. The substitution of cations as described above may affect the properties (e.g. hardness, toughness, strength, thermal conductivity, etc.) of the ceramic.
Crystals formed by heat-treating amorphous to provide embodiments of glass-ceramics made according to the present invention may be, for example, acicular equiaxed, columnar, or flattened splat-like features.
Some exemplary glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention, comprise at least 75 (in some embodiments at least 80, or even at least 85) percent by weight Al2O3, La2O3 in a range from 0 to 25 (in some embodiments, 0 to 10, or even 0 to 5) percent by weight, Y2O3 in a range from 5 to 25 (in some embodiments, 5 to 20, or even 10 to 20) percent by weight, MgO in a range from 0 to 8 (in some embodiments, 0 to 4, or even 0 to 2) percent by weight, based on the total weight of the glass or glass-ceramic respectively. In some embodiments, the glass or glass-ceramic further comprises SiO2 in an amount up to 10 (in some embodiments, in a range from 0.5 to 5, 0.5 to 2, or 0.5 to 1) percent by weight, based on the total weight of the glass or glass-ceramic, respectively.
Some exemplary glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention, comprise at least 75 (in some embodiments at least 80, 85, or even at least 90) percent by weight Al2O3 and SiO2 in an amount up to 10 (in some embodiments, in a range from 0.5 to 5, 0.5 to 2, or 0.5 to 1) percent by weight, based on the total weight of the glass or glass-ceramic, respectively.
Although the glass or glass-ceramic may be in the form of a bulk material, it is also within the scope of the present invention to provide composites comprising a glass, glass-cermanic, etc. according to the present invention. Such a composite may comprise, for example, a phase or fibers (continuous or discontinuous) or particles (including whiskers) (e.g., metal oxide particles, boride particles, carbide particles, nitride particles, diamond particles, metallic particles, glass particles, and combinations thereof) dispersed in a glass, glass-ceramic, etc. according to the present invention, invention or a layered-composite structure (e.g., a gradient of glass-ceramic to glass used to make the glass-ceramic and/or layers of different compositions of glass-ceramics).
Certain glasses made according to the present invention may have, for example, a Tg in a range of about 750° C. to about 950° C.
The average hardness of the glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be determined as follows. Sections of the material are mounted in mounting resin (obtained under the trade designation “TRANSOPTIC POWDER” from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill.) typically in a cylinder of resin about 2.5 cm in diameter and about 1.9 cm high. The mounted section is prepared using conventional polishing techniques using a polisher (such as that obtained from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill, under the trade designation “ECOMET 3”). The sample is polished for about 3 minutes with a diamond wheel, followed by 5 minutes of polishing with each of 45, 30, 15, 9, 3, and 1-micrometer slurries. The microhardness measurements are made using a conventional microhardness tester (such as that obtained under the trade designation “MITUTOYO MVK-VL” from Mitutoyo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a Vickers indenter using a 100-gram indent load. The microhardness measurements are made according to the guidelines stated in ASTM Test Method E384 Test Methods for Microhardness of Materials (1991), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The average hardness is an average of 10 measurements.
Certain glasses made according to the present invention may have, for example, an average hardness of at least 5 GPa (more desirably, at least 6 GPa, 7 GPa, 8 GPa, or 9 GPa; typically in a range of about 5 GPa to about 10 GPa), and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention at least 5 GPa (more desirably, at least 6 GPa, 7 GPa, 8 GPa, 9 GPa, 10 GPa, 11 GPa, 12 GPa, 13 GPa, 14 GPa, 15 GPa, 16 GPa, 17 GPa, or 18 GPa (or more); typically in a range of about 5 GPa to about 18 GPa). Abrasive particles made according to the present invention have an average hardness of at least 15 GPa, in some embodiments, at least 16 GPa, at least 17 GPa, or even at least 18 GPa.
Certain glasses made according to the present invention may have, for example, a thermal expansion coefficient in a range of about 5×10−6/K to about 11×10−6/K over a temperature range of at least 25° C. to about 900° C.
Typically, and desirably, the (true) density, sometimes referred to as specific gravity, of glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention is typically at least 70% of theoretical density. More desirably, the (true) density of glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention is at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or even 100% of theoretical density. Abrasive particles made according to the present invention have densities of at least 85%, 90%, 92%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or even 100% of theoretical density.
Articles can be made using glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention, for example, as a filler, reinforcement material, and/or matrix material. For example, glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be in the form of particles and/or fibers suitable for use as reinforcing materials in composites (e.g., ceramic, metal, or polymeric (thermosetting or thermoplastic)). The particles and/or fibers may, for example, increase the modulus, heat resistance, wear resistance, and/or strength of the matrix material. Although the size, shape, and amount of the particles and/or fibers used to make a composite may depend, for example, on the particular matrix material and use of the composite, the size of the reinforcing particles typically range from about 0.1 to 1500 micrometers, more typically 1 to 500 micrometers, and desirably between 2 to 100 micrometers. The amount of particles for polymeric applications is typically about 0.5 percent to about 75 percent by weight, more typically about 1 to about 50 percent by weight. Examples of thermosetting polymers include: phenolic, melamine, urea formaldehyde, acrylate, epoxy, urethane polymers, and the like. Examples of thermoplastic polymers include: nylon, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, polyester, polyamides, and the like.
Examples of uses for reinforced polymeric materials (i.e., reinforcing particles made according to the present invention dispersed in a polymer) include protective coatings, for example, for concrete, furniture, floors, roadways, wood, wood-like materials, ceramics, and the like, as well as, anti-skid coatings and injection molded plastic parts and components.
Further, for example, glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be used as a matrix material. For example, glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be used as a binder for ceramic materials and the like such as diamond, cubic-BN, Al2O3, ZrO2, Si3N4, and SiC. Examples of useful articles comprising such materials include composite substrate coatings, cutting tool inserts abrasive agglomerates, and bonded abrasive articles such as vitrified wheels. The glasses and glass-ceramics made according to the present invention can be used as binders, for example, to increase the modulus, heat resistance, wear resistance, and/or strength of the composite article.
Abrasive particles made according to the present invention generally comprise crystalline ceramic (e.g., at least 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99.5, or even 100 percent by volume crystalline ceramic). In another aspect, the present invention provides a plurality of particles having a particle size distribution ranging from fine to coarse, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of particles are abrasive particles according to the present invention. In another aspect, embodiments of abrasive particles made according to the present invention generally comprise (e.g., at least 75, 80, 85, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99.5, or even 100 percent by volume) glass-ceramic made according to the present invention.
Abrasive particles made according to the present invention can be screened and graded using techniques well known in the art, including the use of industry recognized grading standards such as ANSI (American National Standard Institute), FEPA (Federation Europeenne des Fabricants de Products Abrasifs), and JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard). Abrasive particles made according to the present invention may be used in a wide range of particle sizes, typically ranging in size from about 0.1 to about 5000 micrometers, more typically from about 1 to about 2000 micrometers; desirably from about 5 to about 1500 micrometers, more desirably from about 100 to about 1500 micrometers.
In a given particle size distribution, there will be a range of particle sizes, from coarse particles to fine particles. In the abrasive art this range is sometimes referred to as a “coarse”, “control” and “fine” fractions. Abrasive particles graded according to industry accepted grading standards specify the particle size distribution for each nominal grade within numerical limits. Such industry accepted grading standards include those known as the American National Standards Institute, Inc. (ANSI) standards, Federation of European Producers of Abrasive Products (FEPA) standards, and Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) standards. ANSI grade designations (i.e., specified nominal grades) include: ANSI 4, ANSI 6, ANSI 8, ANSI 16, ANSI 24, ANSI 36, ANSI 40, ANSI 50, ANSI 60, ANSI 80, ANSI 100, ANSI 120, ANSI 150, ANSI 180, ANSI 220, ANSI 240, ANSI 280, ANSI 320, ANSI 360, ANSI 400, and ANSI 600. FEPA grade designations include P8, P12, P16, P24, P36, P40, P50, P60, P80, P100, P120, P150, P180, P220, P320, P400, P500, P600, P800, P1000, and P1200. JIS grade designations include JIS8, JIS12, JIS16, JIS24, JIS36, JIS46, JIS54, JIS60, JIS80, JIS100, JIS150, JIS180, JIS220, JIS240, JIS280, JIS320, JIS360, JIS400, JIS600, JIS800, JIS1000, JIS1500, JIS2500, JIS4000, JIS6000, JIS8000, and JIS 10,000.
After crushing and screening, there will typically be a multitude of different abrasive particle size distributions or grades. These multitudes of grades may not match a manufacturer's or supplier's needs at that particular time. To minimize inventory, it is possible to recycle the off demand grades back into melt to form glass. This recycling may occur after the crushing step, where the particles are in large chunks or smaller pieces (sometimes referred to as “fines”) that have not been screened to a particular distribution.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for making abrasive particles, the method comprising heat-treating glass particles or particles comprising glass described herein to provide abrasive particles comprising a glass-ceramic according to the present invention. Alternatively, for example, the present invention provides a method for making abrasive particles, the method comprising heat-treating glass described herein, and crushing the resulting heat-treated material to provide abrasive particles comprising a glass-ceramic according to the present invention. When crushed, glass tends to provide sharper particles than crushing significantly crystallized glass-ceramics or crystalline material.
In another aspect, the present invention provides agglomerate abrasive grains each comprising a plurality of abrasive particles made according to the present invention bonded together via a binder. In another aspect, the present invention provides an abrasive article (e.g., coated abrasive articles, bonded abrasive articles (including vitrified, resinoid, and metal bonded grinding wheels, cutoff wheels, mounted points, and honing stones), nonwoven abrasive articles, and abrasive brushes) comprising a binder and a plurality of abrasive particles, wherein at least a portion of the abrasive particles are abrasive particles (including where the abrasive particles are agglomerated) made according to the present invention. Methods of making such abrasive articles and using abrasive articles are well known to those skilled in the art. Furthermore, abrasive particles made according to the present invention can be used in abrasive applications that utilize abrasive particles, such as slurries of abrading compounds (e.g., polishing compounds), milling media, shot blast media, vibratory mill media, and the like.
Coated abrasive articles generally include a backing, abrasive particles, and at least one binder to hold the abrasive particles onto the backing. The backing can be any suitable material, including cloth, polymeric film, fibre, nonwoven webs, paper, combinations thereof, and treated versions thereof. The binder can be any suitable binder, including an inorganic or organic binder (including thermally curable resins and radiation curable resins). The abrasive particles can be present in one layer or in two layers of the coated abrasive article.
An example of a coated abrasive article is depicted in
Bonded abrasive articles typically include a shaped mass of abrasive particles held together by an organic, metallic, or vitrified binder. Such shaped mass can be, for example, in the form of a wheel, such as a grinding wheel or cutoff wheel. The diameter of grinding wheels typically is about 1 cm to over 1 meter; the diameter of cut off wheels about 1 cm to over 80 cm (more typically 3 cm to about 50 cm). The cut off wheel thickness is typically about 0.5 mm to about 5 cm, more typically about 0.5 mm to about 2 cm. The shaped mass can also be in the form, for example, of a honing stone, segment, mounted point, disc (e.g. double disc grinder) or other conventional bonded abrasive shape. Bonded abrasive articles typically comprise about 3–50% by volume bond material, about 30–90% by volume abrasive particles (or abrasive particle blends), up to 50% by volume additives (including grinding aids), and up to 70% by volume pores, based on the total volume of the bonded abrasive article.
An exemplary grinding wheel is shown in
Nonwoven abrasive articles typically include an open porous lofty polymer filament structure having abrasive particles made according to the present invention distributed throughout the structure and adherently bonded therein by an organic binder. Examples of filaments include polyester fibers, polyamide fibers, and polyaramid fibers. An exemplary nonwoven abrasive article is shown in
Useful abrasive brushes include those having a plurality of bristles unitary with a backing (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,427,595 (Pihl et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,906 (Pihl et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,067 (Johnson et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,903,951 (Ionta et al.), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). Desirably, such brushes are made by injection molding a mixture of polymer and abrasive particles.
Suitable organic binders for making abrasive articles include thermosetting organic polymers. Examples of suitable thermosetting organic polymers include phenolic resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, urethane resins, acrylate resins, polyester resins, aminoplast resins having pendant α,β-unsaturated carbonyl groups, epoxy resins, acrylated urethane, acrylated epoxies, and combinations thereof. The binder and/or abrasive article may also include additives such as fibers, lubricants, wetting agents, thixotropic materials, surfactants, pigments, dyes, antistatic agents (e.g., carbon black, vanadium oxide, graphite, etc.), coupling agents (e.g., silanes, titanates, zircoaluminates, etc.), plasticizers, suspending agents, and the like. The amounts of these optional additives are selected to provide the desired properties. The coupling agents can improve adhesion to the abrasive particles and/or filler. The binder chemistry may thermally cured, radiation cured or combinations thereof. Additional details on binder chemistry may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,419 (Caul et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,138 (Turney et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,063 (Follett et al.), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
More specifically with regard to vitrified bonded abrasives, vitreous bonding materials, which exhibit an amorphous structure and are typically hard, are well known in the art. In some cases, the vitreous bonding material includes crystalline phases. Bonded, vitrified abrasive articles according to the present invention may be in the shape of a wheel (including cut off wheels), honing stone, mounted pointed or other conventional bonded abrasive shape. In some embodiments, a vitrified bonded abrasive article according to the present invention is in the form of a grinding wheel.
Examples of metal oxides that are used to form vitreous bonding materials include: silica, silicates, alumina, soda, calcia, potassia, titania, iron oxide, zinc oxide, lithium oxide, magnesia, boria, aluminum silicate, borosilicate glass, lithium aluminum silicate, combinations thereof, and the like. Typically, vitreous bonding materials can be formed from composition comprising from 10 to 100% glass frit, although more typically the composition comprises 20% to 80% glass frit, or 30% to 70% glass frit. The remaining portion of the vitreous bonding material can be a non-frit material. Alternatively, the vitreous bond may be derived from a non-frit containing composition. Vitreous bonding materials are typically matured at a temperature(s) in a range of about 700° C. to about 1500° C., usually in a range of about 800° C. to about 1300° C., sometimes in a range of about 900° C. to about 1200° C., or even in a range of about 950° C. to about 1100° C. The actual temperature at which the bond is matured depends, for example, on the particular bond chemistry.
In some embodiments, vitrified bonding materials include those comprising silica, alumina (desirably, at least 10 percent by weight alumina), and boria (desirably, at least 10 percent by weight boria). In most cases the vitrified bonding material further comprise alkali metal oxide(s) (e.g., Na2O and K2O) (in some cases at least 10 percent by weight alkali metal oxide(s)).
Binder materials may also contain filler materials or grinding aids, typically in the form of a particulate material. Typically, the particulate materials are inorganic materials. Examples of useful fillers for this invention include: metal carbonates (e.g., calcium carbonate (e.g., chalk, calcite, marl, travertine, marble and limestone), calcium magnesium carbonate, sodium carbonate, magnesium carbonate), silica (e.g., quartz, glass beads, glass bubbles and glass fibers) silicates (e.g., talc, clays, (montmorillonite) feldspar, mica, calcium silicate, calcium metasilicate, sodium aluminosilicate, sodium silicate) metal sulfates (e.g., calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, sodium sulfate, aluminum sodium sulfate, aluminum sulfate), gypsum, vermiculite, wood flour, aluminum trihydrate, carbon black, metal oxides (e.g., calcium oxide (lime), aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide), and metal sulfites (e.g., calcium sulfite).
In general, the addition of a grinding aid increases the useful life of the abrasive article. A grinding aid is a material that has a significant effect on the chemical and physical processes of abrading, which results in improved performance. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that a grinding aid(s) will (a) decrease the friction between the abrasive particles and the workpiece being abraded, (b) prevent the abrasive particles from “capping” (i.e., prevent metal particles from becoming welded to the tops of the abrasive particles), or at least reduce the tendency of abrasive particles to cap, (c) decrease the interface temperature between the abrasive particles and the workpiece, or (d) decreases the grinding forces.
Grinding aids encompass a wide variety of different materials and can be inorganic or organic based. Examples of chemical groups of grinding aids include waxes, organic halide compounds, halide salts and metals and their alloys. The organic halide compounds will typically break down during abrading and release a halogen acid or a gaseous halide compound. Examples of such materials include chlorinated waxes like tetrachloronaphtalene, pentachloronaphthalene, and polyvinyl chloride. Examples of halide salts include sodium chloride, potassium cryolite, sodium cryolite, ammonium cryolite, potassium tetrafluoroboate, sodium tetrafluoroborate, silicon fluorides, potassium chloride, and magnesium chloride. Examples of metals include, tin, lead, bismuth, cobalt, antimony, cadmium, and iron titanium. Other miscellaneous grinding aids include sulfur, organic sulfur compounds, graphite, and metallic sulfides. It is also within the scope of the present invention to use a combination of different grinding aids, and in some instances this may produce a synergistic effect.
Grinding aids can be particularly useful in coated abrasive and bonded abrasive articles. In coated abrasive articles, grinding aid is typically used in the supersize coat, which is applied over the surface of the abrasive particles. Sometimes, however, the grinding aid is added to the size coat. Typically, the amount of grinding aid incorporated into coated abrasive articles are about 50–300 g/m2 (desirably, about 80–160 g/m2). In vitrified bonded abrasive articles grinding aid is typically impregnated into the pores of the article.
The abrasive articles can contain 100% abrasive particles according to the present invention, or blends of such abrasive particles with other abrasive particles and/or diluent particles. However, at least about 2% by weight, desirably at least about 5% by weight, and more desirably about 30–100% by weight, of the abrasive particles in the abrasive articles should be abrasive particles made according to the present invention. In some instances, the abrasive particles made according the present invention may be blended with another abrasive particles and/or diluent particles at a ratio between 5 to 75% by weight, about 25 to 75% by weight about 40 to 60% by weight, or about 50% to 50% by weight (i.e., in equal amounts by weight). Examples of suitable conventional abrasive particles include fused aluminum oxide (including white fused alumina, heat-treated aluminum oxide and brown aluminum oxide), silicon carbide, boron carbide, titanium carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, garnet, fused alumina-zirconia, and sol-gel-derived abrasive particles, and the like. The sol-gel-derived abrasive particles may be seeded or non-seeded. Likewise, the sol-gel-derived abrasive particles may be randomly shaped or have a shape associated with them, such as a rod or a triangle. Examples of sol gel abrasive particles include those described U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,827 (Leitheiser et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,518,397 (Leitheiser et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,623,364 (Cottringer et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,802 (Schwabel), U.S. Pat. No. 4,770,671 (Monroe et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,881,951 (Wood et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,508 (Wald et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,968 (Pellow), U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,978 (Wood), U.S. Pat. No. 5,201,916 (Berg et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,227,104 (Bauer), U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,523 (Rowenhorst et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,647 (Larmie), U.S. Pat. No. 5,498,269 (Larmie), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,551,963 (Larmie), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional details concerning sintered alumina abrasive particles made by using alumina powders as a raw material source can also be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,259,147 (Falz), U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,467 (Monroe), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,127 (Moltgen), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional details concerning fused abrasive particles, can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 1,161,620 (Coulter), U.S. Pat. No. 1,192,709 (Tone), U.S. Pat. No. 1,247,337 (Saunders et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 1,268,533 (Allen), and U.S. Pat. No. 2,424,645 (Baumann et al.) U.S. Pat. No. 3,891,408 (Rowse et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,172 (Pett et al.). U.S. Pat. No. 3,893,826 (Quinan et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,126,429 (Watson), U.S. Pat. No. 4,457,767 (Poon et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,212 (Dubots et. al), U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,522 (Gibson et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,280 (Dubots et. al), and applications having U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/495,978, 09/496,422, 09/496,638, and Ser. No. 09/496,713, each filed on Feb. 2, 2000, and, Ser. Nos. 09/618,876, 09/618,879, 09/619,106, 09/619,191, 09/619,192, 09/619,215, 09/619,289, 09/619,563, 09/619,729, 09/619,744, and Ser. No. 09/620,262, each filed on Jul. 19, 2000, Ser. No. 09/704,843, filed Nov. 2, 2000, and Ser. No. 09/772,730, filed Jan. 30, 2001, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Additional details concerning fused abrasive particles, can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 1,161,620 (Coulter), U.S. Pat. No. 1,192,709 (Tone), U.S. Pat. No. 1,247,337 (Saunders et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 1,268,533 (Allen), and U.S. Pat. No. 2,424,645 (Baumann et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 3,891,408 (Rowse et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 3,781,172 (Pett et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 3,893,826 (Quinan et at.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,126,429 (Watson), U.S. Pat. No. 4,457,767 (Poon et at.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,212 (Dubots et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,522 (Gibson Ct al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,280 (Dubots et al.), and applications having U.S. Serial Nos. 09/495,978, 09/496,422, 09/496,638, and Ser. No. 09/496,7 13, each filed on Feb. 2, 2000, and, Ser. Nos. 09/618,876, 09/618,879, 09/6 19,106, 09/619,191, 09/619,192, 09/619,215, 09/619,289, 09/619,563, 09/619,729, 09/619,744, and Ser. No. 09/620,262, each filed on Jul. 19, 2000, Ser. No. 09/704,843, filed Nov. 2, 2000, and Ser. No. 09/772,730, filed Jan. 30, 2001, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional details concerning ceramic abrasive particles, can be found, for example, in applications having U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/922,526, 09/922,527, 09/922,528, and Ser. No. 09/922,530, filed Aug. 2,2001, now abandoned, Ser. Nos. 10/211,597, 10/211,638, 10/211,629, 10/211,598, 10/211,630, 10/211,639, 10/211,034, 10/211,044, 10/211,628, 10/211,491, 10/211,640, and Ser. No. 10/211,684, each filed Aug. 2,2002, and Ser Nos. 10/358,910, 10/358,855, 10/358,772, 10/358,765, filed the same date as the instant application, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. In some instances, blends of abrasive particles may result in an abrasive article that exhibits improved grinding performance in comparison with abrasive articles comprising 100% of either type of abrasive particle.
If there is a blend of abrasive particles, the abrasive particle types forming the blend may be of the same size. Alternatively, the abrasive particle types may be of different particle sizes. For example, the larger sized abrasive particles may be abrasive particles made according to the present invention, with the smaller sized particles being another abrasive particle type. Conversely, for example, the smaller sized abrasive particles may be abrasive particles made according to the present invention, with the larger sized particles being another abrasive particle type.
Examples of suitable diluent particles include marble, gypsum, flint, silica, iron oxide, aluminum silicate, glass (including glass bubbles and glass beads), alumina bubbles, alumina beads and diluent agglomerates. Abrasive particles made according to the present invention can also be combined in or with abrasive agglomerates. Abrasive agglomerate particles typically comprise a plurality of abrasive particles, a binder, and optional additives. The binder may be organic and/or inorganic. Abrasive agglomerates may be randomly shape or have a predetermined shape associated with them. The shape may be a block, cylinder, pyramid, coin, square, or the like. Abrasive agglomerate particles typically have particle sizes ranging from about 100 to about 5000 micrometers, typically about 250 to about 2500 micrometers. Additional details regarding abrasive agglomerate particles may be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,311,489 (Kressner), U.S. Pat. No. 4,652,275 (Bloecher et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,939 (Bloecher et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,962 (Holmes et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,988 (Christianson), and applications having U.S. Ser. No. 09/688,444 and Ser. No. 09/688,484, filed Oct. 16, 2000, Ser. Nos. 09/688,444, 09/688,484, 09/688,486, filed Oct. 16, 2000, and Ser. Nos. 09/971,899, 09/972,315, and Ser. No. 09/972,316, filed Oct. 5, 2001, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The abrasive particles may be uniformly distributed in the abrasive article or concentrated in selected areas or portions of the abrasive article. For example, in a coated abrasive, there may be two layers of abrasive particles. The first layer comprises abrasive particles other than abrasive particles made according to the present invention, and the second (outermost) layer comprises abrasive particles made according to the present invention. Likewise in a bonded abrasive, there may be two distinct sections of the grinding wheel. The outermost section may comprise abrasive particles made according to the present invention, whereas the innermost section does not. Alternatively, abrasive particles made according to the present invention may be uniformly distributed throughout the bonded abrasive article.
Further details regarding coated abrasive articles can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,104 (Broberg), U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,163 (Larkey), U.S. Pat. No. 5,203,884 (Buchanan et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917(Pieper et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,251 (Culler et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,726 (Stout et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,063 (Follett et al.), U.S.Pat. No. 5,496,386 (Broberg et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,706 (Benedict et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,520,711 (Helmin), U.S. Pat. No. 5,954,844 (Law et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,961,674 (Gagliardi et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,975,988 (Christianson), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Further details regarding bonded abrasive articles can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,107 (Rue), U.S. Pat. No. 4,741,743 (Narayanan et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,685 (Haynes et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,898,597 (Hay et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,461 (Markhoff-Matheny et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,037,453 (Narayanan et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,332 (Narayanan et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,308
(Qi et al.) the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Further details regarding vitreous bonded abrasives can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,107 (Rue), U.S. Pat. No. 4,898,597 (Hay et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,461 (Markhoff-Matheny et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,672 (Giles Jr. et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,326 (Sheldon et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,131,926(Sheldon et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,203,886 (Sheldon et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,875 (Wood et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,738,696 (Wu et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,308 (Qi), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Further details regarding nonwoven abrasive articles can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,958,593 (Hoover et al.), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention provides a method of abrading a surface, the method comprising contacting at least one abrasive particle made according to the present invention, with a surface of a workpiece; and moving at least of one the abrasive particle or the contacted surface to abrade at least a portion of said surface with the abrasive particle. Methods for abrading with abrasive particles made according to the present invention range of snagging (i.e., high pressure high stock removal) to polishing (e.g., polishing medical implants with coated abrasive belts), wherein the latter is typically done with finer grades (e.g., ANSI 220 and finer) of abrasive particles. The abrasive particle may also be used in precision abrading applications, such as grinding cam shafts with vitrified bonded wheels. The size of the abrasive particles used for a particular abrading application will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Abrading with abrasive particles made according to the present invention may be done dry or wet. For wet abrading, the liquid may be introduced or supplied in the form of a light mist to complete flood. Examples of commonly used liquids include: water, water-soluble oil, organic lubricant, and emulsions. The liquid may serve to reduce the heat associated with abrading and/or act as a lubricant. The liquid may contain minor amounts of additives such as bactericide, antifoaming agents, and the like.
Abrasive particles made according to the present invention may be useful, for example, to abrade workpieces such as aluminum metal, carbon steels, mild steels, tool steels, stainless steel, hardened steel, titanium, glass, ceramics, wood, wood-like materials (e.g., plywood and particle board), paint, painted surfaces, organic coated surfaces and the like. The applied force during abrading typically ranges from about 1 to about 100 kilograms.
Advantages and embodiments of this invention are further illustrated by the following examples, but the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise stated, all examples contained no significant amount of SiO2, B2O3, P2O5, GeO2, TeO2, As2O3, and V2O5.
A 250-ml polyethylene bottle (7.3-cm diameter) was charged with a 50-gram mixture of various powders (as specified for each example in Table 1 (below); using the raw material sources listed in Table 2, (below)), 75 grams of isopropyl alcohol, and 200 grams of alumina milling media (cylindrical in shape, both height and diameter of 0.635 cm; 99.9% alumina; obtained from Coors, Golden Colo.). The contents of the polyethylene bottle were milled for 16 hours at 60 revolutions per minute (rpm). After the milling, the milling media were removed and the slurry was poured onto a warm (about 75° C.) glass (“PYREX”) pan in a layer, and allowed to dry and cool. Due to the relatively thin layer of material (i.e., about 3 mm thick) of slurry and the warm pan, the slurry formed a cake within 5 minutes, and dried in about 30 minutes. The dried material was ground by screening through a 70-mesh screen (212-micrometer opening size) with the aid of a paintbrush.
The resulting screened particles were fed slowly (about 0.5 gram/minute) into a hydrogen/oxygen torch flame which melted the particles and carried them directly into a 19-liter (5-gallon) cylindrical container (30 centimeters (cm) diameter by 34 cm height) of continuously circulating, turbulent water (20° C.) to rapidly quench the molten droplets. The torch was a Bethlehem bench burner PM2D Model B obtained from Bethlehem Apparatus Co., Hellertown, Pa. Hydrogen and oxygen flow rates for the torch were as follows. For the inner ring, the hydrogen flow rate was 8 standard liters per minute (SLPM) and the oxygen flow rate was 3.5 SLPM. For the outer ring, the hydrogen flow rate was 23 SLPM and the oxygen flow rate was 12 SLPM. The angle at which the flame hit the water was about 45°, and the flame length, burner to water surface, was about 18 centimeters (cm). The resulting (quenched) beads were collected in a pan and dried at 110° C. in an electrically heated furnace till dried (about 30 minutes). The beads were spherical in shape and varied in size from a few micrometers up to about 250 micrometers and were either transparent (i.e., amorphous) and/or opaque (i.e., crystalline), varying within a sample. Amorphous materials (including glassy materials) are typically predominantly transparent due to the lack of light scattering centers such as crystal boundaries, while the crystalline particles are opaque due to light scattering effects of the crystal boundaries. Until proven to be amorphous and glass by Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA), the transparent flame-formed beads were considered to be only amorphous.
A percent amorphous yield was calculated from the resulting flame-formed beads using a −100+120 mesh size fraction (i.e., the fraction collected between 150-micrometer opening size and 125-micrometer opening size screens). The measurements were done in the following manner. A single layer of beads was spread out upon a glass slide. The beads were observed using an optical microscope. Using the crosshairs in the optical microscope eyepiece as a guide, beads that lay horizontally coincident with crosshair along a straight line were counted either amorphous or crystalline depending on their optical clarity. A total of 500 beads were counted and a percent amorphous yield was determined by the amount of amorphous beads divided by total beads counted.
The phase composition (glass/amorphous/crystalline) was determined through Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA). The material was classified as amorphous if the corresponding DTA trace of the material contained an exothermic crystallization event (Tx). If the same trace also contained an endothermic event (Tg) at a temperature lower than Tx it was considered to consist of a glass phase. If the DTA trace of the material contained no such events, it was considered to contain crystalline phases.
Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was conducted on beads of Example 1 using the following method. A DTA run was made (using an instrument obtained from Netzsch Instruments, Selb, Germany under the trade designation “NETZSCH STA 409 DTA/TGA”) using a −140+170 mesh size fraction (i.e., the fraction collected between 105-micrometer opening size and 90-micrometer opening size screens). An amount of each screened sample was placed in a 100-microliter Al2O3 sample holder. Each sample was heated in static air at a rate of 10° C./minute from room temperature (about 25° C.) to 1100° C.
The DTA trace of the beads prepared in Example 1, shown in
About 5 grams of the glass beads prepared in Example 1 were crystallized by heat-treating at 1250° C. for 15 minutes in an electrically heated furnace. The heat-treated beads were opaque as observed using an optical microscope (prior to heat-treatment, the beads were transparent). The opacity of the heat-treated beads is believed to be a result of the crystallization of at least a portion of the glass. Glassy materials are typically predominantly transparent due to the lack of light scattering centers such as crystal boundaries, while the crystalline materials are opaque due to light scattering effects of the crystal boundaries.
The crystallized beads were mounted in mounting resin (obtained under the trade designation “TRANSOPTIC POWDER” from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill.) in a cylinder of resin about 2.5 cm in diameter and about 1.9 cm high. The mounted section was prepared using conventional polishing techniques using a polisher (such as that obtained from Buehler, Lake Bluff, Ill. under the trade designation “ECOMET 3”). The sample was polished for about 3 minutes with a diamond wheel, followed by 5 minutes of polishing with each of 45, 30, 15, 9, 3, and 1-micrometer slurries. The microhardness measurements are made using a conventional microhardness tester (such as that obtained under the trade designation “MITUTOYO MVK-VL” from Mitutoyo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a Vickers indenter using a 100-gram indent load. The microhardness measurements are made according to the guidelines stated in ASTM Test Method E384 Test Methods for Microhardness of Materials (1991), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The average hardness for Example 1, based on an average of 10 measurements, was 18.8 GPa.
The mounted and polished sample used for the hardness measurement was sputtered with a thin layer of gold-palladium and viewed using a scanning electron microscopy (Model JSM 840A from JEOL, Peabody, Mass.). The average grain size was determined by the line intercept method according to the ASTM standard E 112-96 “Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size”. A typical Back Scattered Electron (BSE) micrograph of the microstructure found in the sample was used to determine the average grain size as follows. The number of grains that intersected per unit length (NL) of a random line were drawn across the micrograph was counted. The average crystallite size is then determined from this number using the following equation.
where NL is the number of crystallites intersected per unit length and M is the magnification of the micrograph.
The measured average crystallite size for Example 1 was 142 nm.
Example 2–3 beads were prepared as described above in Example 1, except the amounts of raw material used are listed in Table 3, below, and the zirconia (ZrO2) particles were obtained from Zirconia Sales, Inc. of Marietta, Ga. under the trade designation “DK-2”; average particle size of 2 micrometers).
A percent amorphous yield was calculated from the resulting flame-formed beads as described for Example 1, above. DTA was conducted as described for Example 1, above. The percent amorphous yield data, the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the crystallization (Tx) temperature are reported in Table 3, above.
About 5 grams of the Examples 2 and 3 glass beads were crystallized by heat-treating them at 1250° C. for 15 minutes under atmospheric pressure (i.e., about 1 atmosphere) in an electrically heated furnace. The resulting heat-treated beads were opaque as observed using an optical microscope (prior to heat-treatment, the beads were transparent). The opacity of the heat-treated beads is believed to be a result of the crystallization of at least a portion of the glass.
The average hardness and average crystallite size for each Examples 2 and 3 were measured as described for Example 1 (above), and reported in Table 4, below.
Examples 4–7 beads were prepared as described above in Example 1 except the amounts of raw material used are reported in Table 5, below, and the raw material sources are reported in Table 6, below. Examples 4–7 have the same composition, but different sources of silica having different average particle sizes.
A percent amorphous yield was calculated from the resulting flame-formed beads as described for Example 1, above. DTA was conducted as described for Example 1, above. The glass transition temperature (Tg) and crystallization temperature (Tx) for Examples 4–7 are reported in Table 5, above. Percent amorphous yield data is reported in Table 7, below.
Referring to Table 7 (above), it was observed that while the amorphous yields of Examples 4–7 were similar, Examples 4 and 5 both produced a larger amount of coarse glass beads, relative to Examples 6 and 7. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the larger particle size of SiO2 sources used in Examples 6 and 7 caused the feed particles to fracture into smaller particles in the flame. Although not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the larger particle size of the SiO2 particles led to thermal stresses, (due to non-uniform expansion, conductivity) leading to fracture, and may have also led to non uniform melting). This effect was observed to be more prominent when the particle size of the SiO2 source was larger than 50 micrometers. Further, it was observed that when the particle size of the SiO2 particles was less than about 5 nm, the SiO2 feed particles tended to be more difficult to handle (i.e., the flow properties of the feed particles tended to be undesirable).
Various modifications and alterations of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention, and it should be understood that this invention is not to be unduly limited to the illustrative embodiments set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 659926 | Jacobs | Oct 1900 | A |
| 906339 | Tone | Dec 1908 | A |
| 960712 | Saunders | Jun 1910 | A |
| 1037999 | Saunders | Sep 1912 | A |
| 1107011 | Allen | Aug 1914 | A |
| 1149064 | Kalmus | Aug 1915 | A |
| 1161620 | Coulter | Nov 1915 | A |
| 1192709 | Tone | Jul 1916 | A |
| 1240490 | Saunders et al. | Sep 1917 | A |
| 1247337 | Saunders et al. | Nov 1917 | A |
| 1257356 | Hutchins | Feb 1918 | A |
| 1263708 | Saunders et al. | Apr 1918 | A |
| 1263709 | Saunders et al. | Apr 1918 | A |
| 1263710 | Saunders et al. | Apr 1918 | A |
| 1268532 | Allen | Jun 1918 | A |
| 1268533 | Allen | Jun 1918 | A |
| 1314061 | Harrison | Aug 1919 | A |
| 1339344 | Hutchins | May 1920 | A |
| 1402714 | Brockbank | Jan 1922 | A |
| 1448586 | Allen | Mar 1923 | A |
| 1910444 | Nicholson | May 1933 | A |
| 2000857 | Masin | May 1935 | A |
| 2206081 | Ebertin | Jul 1940 | A |
| 2424645 | Baumann, Jr. et al. | Jul 1947 | A |
| 2618567 | Constock, III | Nov 1952 | A |
| 2805166 | Lōffler | Sep 1957 | A |
| 2958593 | Hoover et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
| 2961296 | Fenerty | Nov 1960 | A |
| 3041156 | Rowse et al. | Jun 1962 | A |
| 3141747 | Marshall | Jul 1964 | A |
| 3174871 | Geffcken et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3181939 | Marshall et al. | May 1965 | A |
| 3216794 | Roschuk | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3377660 | Marshall et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3498769 | Coes, Jr. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3625717 | Grubba et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3635739 | Macdowell et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3637361 | Kita et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3646713 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3650780 | Connelly | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3714059 | Shaw et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3717583 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3726621 | Cichy | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3754978 | Elmer et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3781172 | Pett et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3792553 | Schleifer et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3859407 | Blanding et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3881282 | Watson | May 1975 | A |
| 3891408 | Rowse et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3893826 | Quinan et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3916584 | Howard et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3926603 | Plesslinger et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3928515 | Richmond et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3940276 | Wilson | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3947281 | Bacon | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3973977 | Wilson | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3996702 | Leahy | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4014122 | Woods | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4035162 | Brothers et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4049397 | Bockstiegel et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4059417 | Ilmaier et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4070796 | Scott | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4073096 | Ueltz et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4111668 | Walker et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4111707 | Komorita et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4126429 | Watson | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4140494 | Coes, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4157898 | Walker et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4182437 | Roberts et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4194887 | Ueltz et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4217264 | Mabie et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4218253 | Dworak et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4238213 | Pallo et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4261706 | Blanding et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4311489 | Kressner | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4314827 | Leitheiser et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4316964 | Lange | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4341533 | Daire et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| RE31128 | Walker et al. | Jan 1983 | E |
| 4405545 | Septier et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4415510 | Richmond | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4439845 | Geohegan, Jr. et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4457767 | Poon et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4467767 | Kampichler et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4472511 | Mennemann et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| RE31725 | Walker et al. | Nov 1984 | E |
| 4489022 | Robyn et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4518397 | Leitheiser et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4530909 | Makishima et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4543107 | Rue | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4552199 | Onoyama et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4584279 | Grabowski et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4588419 | Caul et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4595663 | Krohn et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4623364 | Cottringer et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4652275 | Bloecher et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4705656 | Onoyama et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4734104 | Broberg | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4737163 | Larkey | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741743 | Narayanan et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4744802 | Schwabel | May 1988 | A |
| 4751137 | Halg et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4752459 | Pepper | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4756746 | Kemp, Jr. et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4757036 | Kaar et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762677 | Dolgin | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4770671 | Monroe et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4772511 | Wood et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4780268 | Papsi et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4789501 | Day et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4799939 | Bloecher et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4800685 | Haynes, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4812422 | Yuhaku et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4829031 | Roy et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4881951 | Wood et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4898587 | Mera | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4898597 | Hay et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4950294 | Hakamatsuka | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4960441 | Pellow et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4997461 | Markhoff-Matheny et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5007943 | Kelly et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5009675 | Kunz et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5009676 | Rue et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011508 | Wald et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5013696 | Greskovich et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023212 | Dubots et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5038453 | Kurita et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042991 | Kunz et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057018 | Bowen | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5071801 | Bedard et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5085671 | Martin et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5090968 | Pellow | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5094672 | Giles, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5104319 | Evans et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110332 | Isaksson | May 1992 | A |
| 5118326 | Lee et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122176 | Goettler | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5131926 | Rostoker et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5139978 | Wood | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143522 | Gibson et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152917 | Pieper et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5164348 | Wood | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5185299 | Wood et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194072 | Rue et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201916 | Berg et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5203884 | Buchanan et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5203886 | Sheldon et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5213591 | Celikkaya et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5215563 | LaCourse et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5227104 | Bauer | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5248318 | Tamamaki et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5259147 | Falz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5273566 | Balcar et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5282875 | Wood et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5312789 | Wood | May 1994 | A |
| 5336280 | Dubots et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5352254 | Celikkaya | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5366523 | Rowenhorst et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372620 | Rowse et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376470 | Sprouse | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378251 | Culler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5378662 | Tsuyuki | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395407 | Cottringer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5413974 | Yokoyama et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417726 | Stout et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5427595 | Pihl et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429647 | Larmie | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5431704 | Tamamaki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5436063 | Follett et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5443906 | Pihl et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5449389 | Yoshizumi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5484752 | Waku et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5496386 | Broberg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5498269 | Larmie | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5516348 | Conwell et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5520711 | Helmin | May 1996 | A |
| 5534843 | Tsunoda et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5547479 | Conwell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549962 | Holmes et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551963 | Larmie | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5552213 | Eschner | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569547 | Waku et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5593467 | Monroe | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5605870 | Strom-Olsen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609706 | Benedict et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5611829 | Monroe et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5641469 | Garg et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645619 | Erickson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651925 | Ashley et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653775 | Plovnick et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665127 | Moltgen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5679067 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682082 | Wei et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5693239 | Wang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5721188 | Sung et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725162 | Garg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733178 | Obishi | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733564 | Lehtinen | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5738696 | Wu | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747397 | McPherson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763345 | Ohshima et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782940 | Jayan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5804513 | Sakatani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5847865 | Gopinath et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856254 | Feige et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5863308 | Qi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5876470 | Abrahamson | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902763 | Waku et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903951 | Ionta et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5952256 | Morishita et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954844 | Law et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961674 | Gagliardi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5976274 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981413 | Hale | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981415 | Waku et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6053956 | Wood | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054093 | Torre, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6123743 | Carman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128430 | Chu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146244 | Atsugi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6214429 | Zou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6245700 | Budd et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251813 | Sato | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254981 | Castle | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268303 | Aitken et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6277161 | Castro et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287353 | Celikkaya | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306926 | Bretscher et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6335083 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6361414 | Ravkin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6362119 | Chiba | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6447937 | Murakawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451077 | Rosenflanz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454822 | Rosenflanz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458731 | Rosenflanz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461988 | Budd et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6469825 | Digonnet et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6482758 | Weber et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482761 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484539 | Nordine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490081 | Feillens et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6511739 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6514892 | Kasai et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6521004 | Culler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6582488 | Rosenflanz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6583080 | Rosenflanz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589305 | Rosenflanz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6592640 | Rosenflanz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6596041 | Rosenflanz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6607570 | Rosenflanz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6620214 | McArdle et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6666750 | Rosenflanz | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6749653 | Castro et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 20010030811 | Kasai et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020066233 | McArdle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160694 | Wood et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030040423 | Harada et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110706 | Rosenflanz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040148868 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050075233 | Weber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 333146 | Nov 1976 | AT |
| 20 34 011 | Jul 1970 | DE |
| 134 638 | Mar 1979 | DE |
| 141 420 | Apr 1980 | DE |
| 0 200 487 | Nov 1986 | EP |
| 0 227 374 | Jul 1987 | EP |
| 0 236 507 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0 291 029 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0 408 771 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0 469 271 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 480 678 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 494 638 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 495 536 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 579 281 | Jan 1994 | EP |
| 0 601 453 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 647 601 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 0 666 238 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 666 239 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 709 347 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0 722 919 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0 291 029 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 2 118 026 | Jul 1972 | FR |
| 2 538 370 | Jun 1984 | FR |
| 2 609 708 | Jul 1988 | FR |
| 793503 | Apr 1958 | GB |
| 1005338 | Sep 1965 | GB |
| 1 260 933 | Jan 1972 | GB |
| 2 116 992 | Oct 1983 | GB |
| 2 377 438 | Jan 2003 | GB |
| 50-25608 | Mar 1975 | JP |
| 59 22 7726 | Dec 1984 | JP |
| 62-003041 | Jan 1987 | JP |
| S 63-156024 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| S 63-303821 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| HEI 4-119941 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 05-085821 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 05-226733 | Sep 1993 | JP |
| 06 040765 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 06-171974 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| 3113428 | May 1999 | JP |
| HEI 11-189926 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 200045128 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 200045129 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 201294480 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2003-94414 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 9601009 | Jan 1996 | KR |
| WO 9414722 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO 9716385 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9725284 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 0034201 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0116047 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0123321 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0123323 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0127046 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0156946 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0156947 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0156949 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0156950 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0208146 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 03011776 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040148966 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |
