This application is related to commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/658,814 filed 8 Sep. 2003, by K. Surace and M. Porat, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,181,891, issued 27 Feb. 2007 titled “ACOUSTICAL SOUND PROOFING MATERIAL AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING SAME”, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,691 filed 9 Apr. 2007 by B. Tinianov, titled “ACOUSTICAL SOUND PROOFING MATERIAL WITH IMPROVED FRACTURE CHARACTERISTICS AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING SAME”, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,476 filed 12 Jun. 28, 2007 by B. Tinianov and K. Surace, titled “METHODS OF MANUFACTURING ACOUSTICAL SOUND PROOFING MATERIAL”, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Currently, the manufacture of bulky and/or heavy laminated panels for use in building construction requires a large area for manufacturing. In addition to the bulk associated with the material in-process, the area required for manufacturing is increased by any process step requiring the material be staged for a long period of time. For a given throughput of material, the area needed increases with additional processing steps and with a longer processing time at any step.
For example, the laminated structure disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,181,891 comprises two external layers of a non-metallic material (which in one embodiment are paper faced sheets of gypsum wallboard), and an internal constraining layer, attached to each other by adhesive layers of viscoelastic glue. In some embodiments other materials are incorporated between the outer gypsum layers. In one embodiment the process of manufacturing a laminar structure, for example the structure disclosed in the '891 patent, includes drying a completed structure whilst pressure is applied to the structure. Depending upon the materials that make up the laminar structure, a dwell time (defined as the time required for a single process step) of several hours to a few days is required for the adhesive to properly dry, during which time other similar individual structures may be constructed which also require a dwell time of several hours to a few days to dry. The long drying time is due to the time required for liquid in the adhesive to soak into the gypsum sheets, the gypsum sheets then transporting the liquid to the surrounding environment via evaporation. A significant volume of material is staged at the drying step in the described construction sequence, the volume depending upon the production rate. As a result, a large drying chamber corresponding to the volume of a single structure multiplied by the finished product throughput desired and the dwell time of the instant step is required. Further, some steps of the manufacturing process may require that the drying chamber be maintained at a specified elevated temperature and low relative humidity, an energy intensive requirement.
For example, a production demand of one thousand finished four-foot by eight foot by one-inch structures per day, with a dwell time at a certain step requiring forty-eight hours of drying at a constant temperature of 120 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit, a relative humidity of about thirty per cent, and a constant airflow requires a staging area providing the required environmental conditions for two thousand structures at any given time, such staging area providing a minimum of 25 feet of vertical clearance on an approximately 25 foot by 45 foot footprint, amounting to 28,125 cubic feet of conditioned space. When manufacturing demands more than one thousand finished panels per day, even more drying volume is required. Any other process steps also requiring significant dwell time similarly increase the facilities needed for a given manufacturing throughput. A long cycle time, defined as the time required to construct a finished structure from start to finish, also extends the time required for a manufacturing operation to respond to an increase in demand for the manufactured product.
Another critical aspect of the existing manufacturing processes is that the outer layers of the laminated panel (in one embodiment, paper faced gypsum wallboard) consist of complete and finished forms of traditional building materials. It has been demonstrated by U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,691, that for embodiments employing gypsum wallboard, it is preferable if there is no facing paper on the interior surfaces that are in contact with the viscoelastic glue. In U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,691 it was proposed that the panels to be combined into the laminated soundproof panel be manufactured or sourced so as not to have a durable paper across one face. This is difficult in practice because the paper faces (on either side of the gypsum wallboard panel) serve as a durable, wear resistant surface and also significantly improve the bending stiffness of the gypsum wallboard. Without paper on one surface, the modified gypsum wallboard is particularly susceptible to damage and/or destruction during transport and handling.
A second concern with these modified, paperless gypsum wallboard source materials is that their manufacture is difficult, driving their prices higher than the prices of traditional panels. Also, only a few manufacturers are able to produce these modified materials and as a result, the material supply for the laminated panels may be limited.
What is needed is a manufacturing method for an easily scored and snapped laminar structure wherein intermediate process staging of product during manufacture is minimized and raw material costs are greatly reduced.
A laminar structure comprising a sandwich of a plurality of materials is constructed using process methods wherein the dwell time at certain steps is reduced from hours or days to a few minutes. In one embodiment adhesive is dried prior to adding any additional layers to the laminated build-up, eliminating the lengthy process step of drying the complete laminated structure. The adhesive is dried by blowing gas across the surface of the specifically formulated adhesive immediately after the adhesive is applied, forming a pressure sensitive adhesive (“PSA”). The next layer in the sandwich may then be applied with no further drying time required. In one embodiment the individual process dwell times and total cycle time are shortened enough to permit construction of complete laminar structures using a conveyor belt type assembly line apparatus, wherein no in-process material is staged or stacked up.
Additionally, the process employs a novel manufacturing step in which a stock gypsum wallboard panel is bisected along its thickness to produce two congruent halves that lack paper on their interior surfaces. This step reduces the raw of the stock materials and for a laminated panel in accordance with this invention maintains or improves the fracture characteristics of the laminated panel (ability to score and snap the panel).
This invention will be more fully understood in view of the following drawings and written description.
a and 3b show methods of bisecting the gypsum wallboard stock panels.
A laminar substitute for drywall comprises a sandwich of two outer layers of selected thickness gypsum board or other material which are glued to each other, using a sound dissipating adhesive wherein the sound dissipating adhesive is applied in a certain pattern to all or less than all of the interior surfaces of the two outer layers. In one embodiment, the adhesive layer is a specially formulated QUIETGLUE (QuietGlue)® 320 adhesive, which is a viscoelastic material, of a specific thickness. QUIETGLUE(QuietGlue)® 320 adhesive is available from Serious Materials, Inc., of Sunnyvale, Calif. Typically, QUIETGLUE (QuietGlue)® 320 adhesive is made of the materials as set forth in Table 1.
The preferred formulation is but one example of a viscoelastic glue. Other formulations may be used to achieve similar results and the range given is an example of successful formulations investigated. Formed on the interior surfaces of the two gypsum boards, the adhesive layer is about 1/16 inch thick. In various embodiments a differing number of layers of material of differing composition are sandwiched between the outer gypsum boards, each layer glued to adjoining layers by PSA. In the following discussion “adhesive”, “glue”, and “PSA” may be used interchangeably to refer to a layer of material in the context of a laminar structure sandwich. In this written description, PSA always refers to a layer of viscoelastic glue which has been dried to form a viscoelastic pressure sensitive adhesive.
Referring to
Manufacturing process step 104 specifies that the gypsum wallboard is bisected across its thickness. The resulting cut panel is shown in perspective in
The novel bisection of the gypsum core offers two important advantages over the existing methods. First, a single bisected sheet is significantly less expensive than a comparable laminate of two sheets of half thickness. For example, ⅝ inch thick sheets of 4 foot wide by 8 foot long type x gypsum have a wholesale price of approximately $150 per one thousand square feet (msf). A 5/16 inch thick panel, also 4 foot wide by 8 foot long, has a wholesale price of approximately $125 to $150 per one thousand square feet. However, without bisection, two 5/16 inch thick sheets are required to replace every bisected ⅝ inch thick panel. Therefore, in this example, the cost of the laminated gypsum wallboard is $150 msf for the bisected panel verses about $250 to $300 msf for a stacked pair of 5/16 inch thick panels. The bisection novelty saves approximately 40% to 50% of the panel material costs. A second advantage is that the bisection technique allows for optimum fracture characteristics (as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/697,691) but without non-standard outer layers of material. This allows for much greater variability in sourcing feed stock panels. As a result, the novel manufacturing method has better material supply and pricing.
a and 3b show two exemplary methods for bisecting the stock gypsum wallboard panel.
b again depicts the stock gypsum wallboard panel 302 resting on a platform, rollers, conveyor belt, or other suitable support 304. Across the face of the panel is a mechanical cutting device in the form of a saw blade 308 and a motorized support structure such as a band saw tool 310. Suitable commercially-available panel cutting equipment includes the Bavaria SL 130i mobile sawmill manufactured by SERRA Maschinenbau GmbH of Rimsting, Germany. This saw has a linear traversing head attached to a rigid panel support structure. Trials employing the SL 130i were able to bisect the gypsum panel at a rate of approximately thirteen feet per minute. This rate is consistent with the improved manufacturing rates disclosed herein.
Following the panel's bisection, the panels are separated in process step 106 so that lower panel half 204 may be coated in part or entirely with glue by an appropriate means from above as specified by process step 108. The top portion of the bisected panel 204 is best lifted using a distributed vacuum suction cup system. Commercially available vacuum assist systems are the Saugerspinne and the VacuMaster Light vacuum assisted lifting devices manufactured by J. Schmalz GmbH of Glatten, Germany.
Next, the adhesive 404 is dried as described in manufacturing process step 110, so that the resulting moisture content in the adhesive is no greater than five percent by weight.
In one embodiment, a layer of viscoelastic glue at a thickness between one thirty second inch ( 1/32″) and one eighth inch (⅛″) on a panel of material four (4) feet by eight (8) feet was subjected to a flow of ambient air (typically between nineteen degrees centigrade (19° C.) and twenty four degrees centigrade (24° C.) at about fifty thousand cubic feet per minute (50,000 ft3/minute). The initial moisture content of the viscoelastic glue was about thirty percent (30%) by weight and after about five minutes of air flow the moisture content had been reduced to about five percent (5%) by weight.
A variety of methods may be used to dry the adhesive 404. In one embodiment the sandwich with exposed adhesive 410 is passed under a gas diffuser, wherein a volume of gas, for example fifty cubic feet per minute of air, is provided through openings in the diffuser located between about one (1) inch and one (1) foot above the glue. In some embodiments the provided gas is ambient air. In other embodiments the provided gas is preheated and/or dehumidified air. The gas-blowing system comprises a plenum chamber (not shown) for receiving pressurized gas from a blower, the pressurized gas subsequently flowing out through openings in the diffuser onto the surface of the exposed adhesive.
In one embodiment the intermediate panel sandwich 410 is moved on a conveyor belt 408 at ten feet per minute about six (6) toe eight (8) inches under a gas diffuser panel 600, wherein the diffuser 600 is four feet wide and twenty-four feet long (in the direction of belt travel). The adhesive is therefore exposed to the flowing gas of ambient temperature air, approximately 70 degrees Fahrenheit and 30% relative humidity for approximately 2.4 minutes. The exact exhaust area and shape of the diffuser 400 and the openings are not critical, providing the exhaust area of the diffuser 600 permits the desired gas flow, and provided further that the exhaust area of diffuser panel 600 is low enough such that the plenum chamber has adequate back pressure to provide an approximately even flow of gas out of the diffuser. In one embodiment the gas flow is approximately 50,000 cubic feet per minute.
In one embodiment wherein a conveyor belt is not used, the intermediate panel sandwich 410 is placed upon a work surface 408, which may or may not be the same work surface upon which the panel 210 was placed for application of the adhesive 404, and wherein a diffuser 600 approximating the size and shape of the panel sandwich 410 and approximately aligned over the panel sandwich blows gas over the exposed adhesive, for example air at approximately seventeen feet per second velocity with about 50,000 cubic feet per minute volume. An important parameter in the process is the degree of dryness of the adhesive attained in transforming the adhesive 404 into a PSA. For a specific implementation according to the method of the present invention, the combination of drying time, gas flow rate, diffuser panel 600 opening area, temperature and humidity of the gas provided through the diffuser 600, and the thickness of the adhesive 404 are adjusted to provide a suitable liquid content in transforming the adhesive 404 into a PSA, for example five per cent liquid by weight as measured with a moisture sensor such as the MW 3260 microwave moisture sensor manufactured by Tews Electronik of Hamburg, Germany. Assuming these factors are reasonably constant, the drying time is used as a predetermined time for drying step 110. If the adhesive is completely dried the next material in the sandwich may not stick to it. A liquid content of approximately five percent provides a tacky adhesive that has good adhesion characteristics but does not require further drying after the sandwich is assembled in manufacturing process step 112.
Referring to
The fully-assembled laminated structure 400 is pressed together at step 114. In one embodiment the laminated structure 400 is passed under a six-inch diameter roller (or the roller may instead be passed over the laminated structure 400) weighing approximately fifty pounds at approximately ten feet per minute. Following the application of pressure at step 114 the laminated structure 400 is complete and ready for shipping; no further drying or other manufacturing process step is required.
While the process has been described as drying the viscoelastic glue to essentially create a viscoelastic pressure sensitive adhesive, the process can also be used to partially dry the viscoelastic glue thereby to shorten the time that the stacked structure, when fully assembled, must be placed in a drying chamber to remove additional moisture from the viscoelastic glue used to join together the several layers of material.
The foregoing description of some embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. The description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art.
If any disclosures are incorporated herein by reference and such incorporated disclosures conflict in part or whole with the present disclosure, then to the extent of conflict, and/or broader disclosure, and/or broader definition of terms, the present disclosure controls. If such incorporated disclosures conflict in part or whole with one another, then to the extent of conflict, the later-dated disclosure controls.
Given the above disclosure of general concepts and specific embodiments, the scope of protection sought is to be defined by the claims appended hereto. The issued claims are not to be taken as limiting Applicant's right to claim disclosed, but not yet literally claimed subject matter by way of one or more further applications including those filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §120 and/or 35 U.S.C. §251.
Unless expressly stated otherwise herein, ordinary terms have their corresponding ordinary meanings within the respective contexts of their presentations, and ordinary terms of art have their corresponding regular meanings.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2811906 | Chappell | Nov 1957 | A |
3160549 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3215225 | Kirschner | Nov 1965 | A |
3336710 | Raynes | Aug 1967 | A |
3399104 | Ball III et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3424270 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3462899 | Sherman | Aug 1969 | A |
3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
3642511 | Cohn et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3828504 | Egerborg et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4003752 | Isohata et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4112176 | Bailey | Sep 1978 | A |
4156615 | Cukier | May 1979 | A |
4311767 | Kennedy | Jan 1982 | A |
4347912 | Flocke et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4375516 | Barrall | Mar 1983 | A |
4487793 | Haines, Jr. et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4618370 | Green et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4642951 | Mortimer | Feb 1987 | A |
4663224 | Tabata et al. | May 1987 | A |
4678515 | Green et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685259 | Eberhart et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4759164 | Abendroth et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4778028 | Staley | Oct 1988 | A |
4786543 | Ferm | Nov 1988 | A |
4924969 | K'Heureux | May 1990 | A |
4956321 | Barrall | Sep 1990 | A |
4967530 | Clunn | Nov 1990 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5026593 | O'Brien | Jun 1991 | A |
5033247 | Clunn | Jul 1991 | A |
5063098 | Niwa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5110660 | Wolf et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125475 | Ducharme et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5158612 | Savoly et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5240639 | Diez et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5256223 | Alberts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258585 | Juriga | Nov 1993 | A |
5334806 | Avery | Aug 1994 | A |
5342465 | Bronowicki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368914 | Barrett | Nov 1994 | A |
5439735 | Jamison | Aug 1995 | A |
5473122 | Kodiyalam et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474840 | Landin | Dec 1995 | A |
5502931 | Munir | Apr 1996 | A |
5535920 | Blair, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5603192 | Dickson | Feb 1997 | A |
5629503 | Thomasen | May 1997 | A |
5643666 | Eckart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664397 | Holz | Sep 1997 | A |
5691037 | McCutcheon et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695867 | Saitoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5768841 | Swartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5824973 | Haines et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867957 | Holtrop | Feb 1999 | A |
5910082 | Bender et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5945208 | Richards et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954497 | Cloud et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6077613 | Gaffigan | Jun 2000 | A |
6123171 | McNett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6213252 | Ducharme | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240704 | Porter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266427 | Mathur | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286280 | Fahmy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290021 | Strandgaard | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309985 | Virnelson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6342284 | Yu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381196 | Hein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389771 | Moller | May 2002 | B1 |
6443256 | Baig | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6632550 | Yu | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6676744 | Merkley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699426 | Burke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715241 | Gelin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758305 | Gelin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790520 | Todd et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6800161 | Takigawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803110 | Drees et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815049 | Veeramasuneni et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822033 | Yu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825137 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877585 | Tinianov | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913667 | Nudo et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920723 | Downey | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941720 | DeFord et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7041377 | Miura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068033 | Sellers et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7181891 | Surace et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197855 | Della Pepa | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7254894 | Halpert | Aug 2007 | B1 |
20040005484 | Veeramasuneni et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016184 | Huebsch et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040168853 | Gunasekera et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214008 | Dobrusky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050103568 | Sapoval et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130541 | Shah | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060048682 | Wagh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057345 | Surace et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059806 | Gosling et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060108175 | Surace et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070094950 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102237 | Baig | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107350 | Surace et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090107059 | Kipp et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090239429 | Kipp et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100047461 | Colbert | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100116405 | Kipp et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2219785 | Oct 1996 | CA |
1154087 | Nov 2001 | EP |
09-203153 | Aug 1997 | JP |
9634261 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9719033 | May 1997 | WO |
0024690 | May 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090280356 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |