Technical Field
The present application relates generally to the field of manufacturing with novel degradable metallic materials, such as degradable alloys of aluminum, and methods of making products of degradable alloys useful in oilfield exploration, production, and testing.
Background Art
To retrieve hydrocarbons from subterranean reservoirs, wells of a few inches wide and up to several miles long are drilled, tested to measure reservoir properties, and completed with a variety of tools. In drilling, testing, and completing a well, a great variety of tools are deployed down the wellbore (downhole) for a multitude of critical applications. Many situations arise where degradable materials (e.g. materials with an ability to decompose over time) may be technically and economically desirable; for instance an element (i.e., a tool or the part of a tool) that may be needed only temporarily and would require considerable manpower for its retrieval after becoming no longer useful may be conveniently made of a degradable material. If such element is designed (formulated) to degrade within a variety of wellbore conditions after it has served its functions, time and money may be saved. A chief pre-requirement to the industrial use and oilfield use of degradable materials is their manufacturability. In contrast to plastic and polymeric materials, many among which may degrade in a wellbore environment (e.g. polylactic acid in water), metallic materials (e.g., alloys) have typically much greater mechanical strengths, and mechanical strength is necessary to produce oilfield elements that may withstand the high pressure and temperatures existing downhole.
Various degradable metallic materials have been recently disclosed by the same inventors (Marya et al.). For example, U.S. 2007/0181224 by Marya et al. discloses compositions (i.e., materials of all sort: metals, alloys, composites) comprising one or more reactive metals in a major proportion and one or more alloying products in a minor proportion. The compositions are characterized as being of high-strength and being controllably reactive and degradable under defined conditions. The compositions may contain reactive metals selected from products in columns I and II of the Periodic Table and alloying products, such as gallium (Ga), indium (In), zinc (Zn), bismuth (Bi), and aluminum (Al). Oilfield products made from these compositions may be used to temporarily separate fluids from a multitude of zones. Upon completion of their intended functions, the oilfield products may either be fully degraded, or may be forced to fall or on the contrary float to a new position without obstructing operations.
Similarly, U.S. 2008/0105438 discloses the use of high-strength, controllably reactive, and degradable materials to specifically produce oilfield whipstocks and deflectors.
U.S. 2008/0149345 discloses degradable materials, characterized as being smart, for use in a large number of downhole elements. These elements may be activated when the smart degradable materials are degraded in a downhole environment. The smart degradable materials may include alloys of calcium, magnesium, or aluminum, or composites of these materials in combination with non-metallic materials such as plastics, elastomers, and ceramics. The degradation of the smart degradable materials in fluids such as water may result in at least one response that, in turn, triggers other responses, e.g., opening or closing a device, or sensing the presence of particular water-based fluids (e.g. formation water).
Because degradable metallic materials (namely alloys) are useful for a variety of oilfield operations, methods of manufacturing oilfield products made of these degradable materials are highly desirable.
A method in accordance with one embodiment includes adding one or more alloying products to an aluminum or aluminum alloy melt; dissolving the alloying products in the aluminum or aluminum alloy melt, thereby forming a degradable alloy melt; and solidifying the degradable alloy melt to form the degradable alloy.
Another aspect relates to methods for manufacturing a product made of a degradable alloy. A method in accordance with one embodiment includes adding one or more alloying products to an aluminum or aluminum alloy melt in a mould; dissolving the one or more alloying products in the aluminum or aluminum alloy melt to form a degradable alloy melt; and solidifying the degradable alloy melt to form the product.
Another aspect relates to methods for manufacturing a product made of a degradable alloy. A method in accordance with one embodiment includes placing powders of a base metal or a base alloy and powders of one or more alloying products in a mould; and pressing and sintering the powders to form the product.
Other inventive aspects and advantages will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
The following detailed description describes a number of preferred embodiments. The described embodiments are meant to help provide an understanding of the claimed subject matter to one skilled in the art and are not meant to unduly limit the present or future scope of any claims associated with the present application.
Embodiments relate to methods of making degradable alloys and elements (e.g., downhole tools and parts of tools) made at least partially (if not entirely) of one of more degradable alloys. In accordance with embodiments, such degradable alloys are based on aluminum, meaning that aluminum metal (e.g. commercial purity aluminum) or an aluminum alloy (e.g. cast and wrought commercial grades) is the “base metal” and selected “alloying products” are introduced therein such that the resultant material may be characterized as an alloy that is degradable under selected conditions (e.g. water at elevated temperature). In accordance with embodiments, such degradable alloys may be dissolved, fragmented, and/or disintegrated in a controlled manner, for example, by exposure to a fluid (e.g., water) within a selected period of time (e.g., minutes, hours, weeks). By definition, the rates of degradation of these degradable alloys and products are orders of magnitude greater than the rates at which commercial materials like pure aluminum or for instance a 6061 aluminum grade would degrade by a corrosion process. For example, some of these degradable alloys may be fully degraded in cold water even at neutral hydrogen potential (i.e., pH=7.0) whereas aluminum and aluminum alloys would not degrade in a like environment. In fact, at any pH values the degradable alloys useful in connection with embodiments also degrade significantly faster than any commercial aluminum, and that is why they are referred as being degradable alloys (note than commercial aluminum and aluminum alloys slowly degrade in highly acidic and highly basic fluids).
Inventive embodiments relate to novel alterations of known methods used in the manufacture of metal products, such as casting, forming, forging, and powder-metallurgy techniques (e.g., sintering, hot-isostatic pressing). Embodiments are applicable far beyond the oil and gas industry and most generally apply to manufactured products of degradable alloys. One skilled in the art would appreciate that these examples are for illustration only and are not intended to unnecessarily limit the present or future claim scope.
Embodiments are particularly suitable for fabricating degradable alloys with unique properties for use in downhole environments or for manufacturing degradable oilfield elements, such as those listed next. In addition, embodiments may include applications of welding, coating, and surface treatment processes, among any other prior-art processes, to manufacture products made of degradable alloys.
Examples of oilfield products that may be made of degradable alloys include:
In accordance with embodiments, degradable alloys may be based on any common aluminum and aluminum alloys; in this description these common metals and alloys are also referred to as “base metals” or “base alloys” because they are non-degradable. Aluminum and its alloys are indeed not considered to be degradable under either normal or the desired conditions; e.g., they would take years to fully degrade in a downhole formation water, whereas the degradable aluminum alloys in accordance with embodiments may fully degrade within minutes to weeks, depending upon their selected chemical compositions, internal structures (e.g. a graded structure exhibiting compositional gradients), among other factors. These non-degradable base metals or alloys of aluminum may be mixed with selected “alloying products” or additives, such as gallium (Ga), mercury (Hg, even though mercury is highly hazardous and its use should be restricted), indium (In), bismuth (Bi), tin (Sb), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), thallium (Tl), etc., to create a new materials (alloys) that are degradable under certain conditions (e.g. water at a specific temperature). It is to be noted that rarely is a single alloying element effective in producing a degradable alloy. Appropriate combinations of several alloying elements are normally required to balance several properties: e.g., rate of degradation, strength, impact resistance, density in addition to cost and manufacturability. Additives are therefore generally complex mixtures of a variety of the cited elements, among others not listed in this application.
For specific examples of degradable alloys, see the examples disclosed in U.S. Published Application No. 2007/0181224 A1. Some examples of degradable alloys include calcium-lithium (Ca—Li), calcium-magnesium (Ca—Mg), calcium-aluminum (Ca—Al), calcium-zinc (Ca—Zn), and magnesium-lithium (Mg—Li) alloys enriched with tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi) or other low-solubility alloying products (e.g. lead, Pb).
However, of these mentioned degradable alloys, the present application applies exclusively to degradable alloys that possess aluminum as their main constituent; i.e., these alloys are degradable aluminum alloys. Among these alloys may be cited for examples those of aluminum-gallium (Al—Ga), aluminum-indium (Al—In), as well as more complex alloying compositions; e.g. aluminum-gallium-indium (Al—Ga—In), aluminum-gallium-bismuth-tin (Al—Ga—Bi—Sn) alloys. The alloys useful to present inventive embodiments may be considered to be environmentally-friendly (with exception of those having hazardous elements like mercury or lead for instance,) easy to manufacture (e.g. they may be air-melted), and may be produced by conventional techniques provided only a few modifications that are object present inventive embodiments and are intended to facilitate manufacturing and improve alloy quality, among others.
These degradable alloys of aluminum are mechanically strong, impact resistant, and are degradable in a variety of conditions, such as when water is present. For example, some of the degradable aluminum alloys may degrade in completion brines, formation waters regardless of pH, within a matter of minutes in extreme cases, as well as dilute acids, bases, and hydrocarbon-water mixtures. Therefore, these degradable alloys may be utilized to make oilfield elements that are designed to serve temporary functions. Upon completion of their functions, such oilfield products may be degraded in the wellbore environment, thus eliminating the need for their retrieval. Consequently considerable cost advantages may result from the use of such degradable materials.
Alternatively, the initial cast products (11) may be subjected to further process treatments such as machining of the initial products (12) to reshape the initial products into the final desired products (15). Similarly, the initial product (11) may be subjected to coating, surface treatment and/or assembly (13) processes in order to afford the final products (15). In accordance with some embodiments, the initial products (11) may be subjected to machining (12) and coating processes, surface treatments, and/or assembly processes (13) to arrive at the final products (15).
The table below presents examples of downhole oilfield products with suitable methods and processes to manufacture them:
As exemplified in the Table above, various oilfield elements (i.e., device or parts) may be manufactured using degradable alloys and methods, including casting, forming, forging and powder metallurgy techniques.
As illustrated in
Inventive methods aim at altering the properties of pure aluminum as well as aluminum alloys, such as commercially available aluminum like 5086 or 6061 (two wrought grades) or 356 (a cast grade) to create degradable alloys. These methods may be performed at a supplier (manufacturer, vendor) location with minimum alterations to their existing processes. A supplier (manufacturer, vendor) being asked to manufacture a degradable alloy product as opposed to the same exact product of a non-degradable alloy may not see any change in its manufacturing process and does not to know the exact formulation of the additives. The use of additives can provide a useful means to alter the chemical composition of products without having to disclose confidential information of the formulation to a contract service provider.
As noted above, the additives (alloying products) may be conveniently introduced as powders, pellets, tunings, shots, etc., or as a preformed ingot or powder-compacted preform. However, some of the additives (e.g., gallium and mercury) are liquids at or near ambient temperature and require special shipping and handling precautions. For such liquid alloying products, one or more carriers (carrier products) may be introduced therein to force the formation of a solid additive that may be readily handled and deployed safely to a supplier (manufacturer) location. These carrier products may be either metallurgically bond with the alloying products (e.g., gallium), and/or they may be infiltrated by the alloying products so that these alloying products may be convenient handled as solid additives. Such alloying product—carrier mixtures may be pulverized, crushed, machined, ground to fine pieces to provide alloying products in the forms of powders, pellets, turnings, shots, etc. Alternatively, the alloying product, along with their carrier, may be made into solid preformed additives like ingots.
For example, a solid preformed additive containing gallium (Ga) that is to be used as a concentrate of alloying products may be produced by adding one or more carrier products. Carrier products suitable with gallium (Ga) include, for examples, lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), and nickel (Ni), among others. Other carriers may simply consist of mixtures, for instance tin (Sn) and zinc (Zn). Tin (Sn) and gallium (Ga), when combined stabilize the liquid phase a lower temperatures, but if additional elements are added in sufficient quantity such as zinc (Zn), among others, a new solid material containing gallium (Ga) will result. This new material may be utilized as solid performed additives. Preformed additives (made of metals and alloys) may therefore have complex chemical compositions, but once incorporated in the hot metal or alloy melt to form the degradable alloy they may decompose to properly alloy with the melt and therefore create a degradable alloy. It is to be noted that the carrier element influences the property of the resulting degradable alloys. However, they are considered carrier products because they are not responsible for making the alloy degradable; instead they influence other properties (e.g. density, strength, et).
Similarly,
Other embodiments include preformed additives of metal and alloys, wherein the metal and alloys are physically contained (dispersed, encapsulated, wrapped, etc) within non-metals; for instance a polymer. This encapsulating non-metallic material carrier, upon contact with the hot melt of aluminum or aluminum alloy, fully degrade and do not negatively impact the properties of the solidified melt. Plastics are degraded (burnt) at aluminum casting temperature and may be used as non-metallic carriers.
As illustrated in
To achieve the desired properties and homogeneity levels within the degradable alloy, for instance one could mix the melt thoroughly with the alloying products (additives) and controllably cool and solidify the aluminum plus alloying element melt. In cases and depending upon the alloying elements within the melt and their partitioning with the melt, rapid cooling may be foreseen to create compositional homogeneity, whereas with other alloying compositions rapid cooling may be used to form compositional gradients within the solidified melt. For instance, with those alloying elements having substantial solubility in solid aluminum and partitioning to great extents during solidification, rapid cooling (as produced by selected heat extraction in selected directions for instance) may be generally used to insure the formation of a graded material. Differently, for alloying elements being non-soluble in the melt and having very different densities, a slow cooling may be used to facilitate the formation of a graded material (i.e., a material or alloy with compositional gradients). It is apparent that appropriate melting and cooling practice will depend on the melt composition and whether the chemical composition of the melt is to be purposely redistributed as in a graded alloy or not.
In instances where small quantities of tin (Sn) and bismuth (Bi) are added to the melt, to achieve a graded material, one could cool the melt slowly and controllably to allow the redistribution of the alloying products within the melt. For example,
The rates of cooling and solidifying, along with different mixing methods of the alloying products, may be controlled in a desired fashion to achieve different gradient patterns.
In addition to casting methods, wherein a melt of a degradable alloy is poured into a mould or die (possibly having the final shape or a near-net shape of the intended product), some embodiments employ powder-metallurgy (PM) techniques. With powder-metallurgy techniques, small solids and/or powders (instead of melts) of metals and alloys are compacted under pressure to form solid materials (including alloys) and products with final or near-final dimensions. By definition a powder is a solid, and with some of the low-temperature metals (e.g. gallium is liquid at ambient temperature), no powder is available. Novel methods to create powders from additives to a non-degradable metal or alloy are therefore disclosed.
Powders and fine piece of degradable alloys may be produced by mechanical grinding, pulverizing, atomizing solid degradable alloys (such as ingots) and degradable alloy melts (droplets). For example, an alloy ingot comprising aluminum (Al), bismuth (Bi), tin (Sn), and gallium (Ga) may be prepared and pulverized into fine powders before using this material in powder-metallurgy processes, such as pressing (including hot-isostatic pressing or HIP) and sintering. The fine grinding of a degradable alloy may also be applied to form fine solid powder of the degradable alloy.
In accordance with embodiments, powders of low-melting temperature additives may be produced by alloying the low melting-temperature additives with other products to raise their melting (solidus and liquidus) temperatures. For example, gallium (Ga) is liquid at or near-room temperature. As previously noted, gallium (Ga) may be properly alloyed with lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni), or zinc (Zn) to convert it into a solid alloy, as shown in
In accordance with an embodiment, a product or part in near-net shape (e.g. a dart/plug, shaped-charge case, tubular, etc.) may be produced by sintering of the above-mentioned degradable alloy powders using methods that employ powder-metallurgy techniques, including pressing and sintering.
In accordance with some embodiments, metal powders that are individually non-degradable may be mixed, pressed, and sintered to produce a final product that is degradable. For example, non-degradable aluminum powder and one or more of alloying product powders (e.g., gallium, bismuth, tin, etc) may be mixed and pressed into a near-final shape of a desired product, followed with high-temperature treatment (sintering) to produce a solid and bonded product that is degradable under selected conditions.
In accordance with some embodiments, a degradable alloy (in the powder form) may be mixed with other metals or non-metallic materials (such as ceramic) to form a composite material, which may be pressed and sintered to produce a product that is still degradable and have some other desired properties conferred by the other materials (such as ceramic). In some embodiments, powders of refractory products (such as carbon, silicon, tungsten, tungsten carbide, etc.) may be introduced, particularly to modify density of the degradable material and/or product, among other properties. These powders may be mixed, pressed, and sintered to produce products of a final shape or a near final shape.
In accordance with some embodiments, the degradable products from casting or powder-metallurgy techniques may be further treated with metal working methods (including forging) that are commonly used in the art.
For example, the degradable alloys may be cold worked before heat-treating to produce fine grain structures and/or to homogenize the alloys. Similarly, the degradable alloys may be cold worked to increase their strengths. For example, a cold-worked tubing may produce a 50-ksi tubular product, as for instance demanded by a perforating gun carrier.
Hot working may also be used to remove internal defects, such as casting voids (in particular shrinkage voids due to the presence of special alloying products), in the degradable alloys. Thus, hot-working (forging) may be used to improve the properties (such as density) of a degradable metallic material.
In a similar manner, coating (deposition) techniques that are commonly used in the industry may be used to create or improve a product having degradability. Examples include deposition of degradable alloys onto a non-degradable material via processes such as weld overlaying. Coating may also be applied to casting or powder-metallurgy products to provide protective layers on these products. Such coating may be used to delay the degradation of the degradable materials. Similarly, surface e treatments may be applied to control surface degradability of a degradable alloy. For example, selected techniques (e.g. etching, diffusion, etc) may be used to selectively modify the surface of a degradable alloy.
In accordance with some embodiments, coating (deposition) techniques may be used to build up a product in a final shape or a near-net shape layer by layer, using degradable materials alone or using the degradable materials on a base substrate made of a non-degradable material (such as a ceramic or a composite).
The products made by methods according to embodiments may be in the final shape ready for use. Alternatively, they may be parts of a larger element. In this case, further assembly of the parts having degradable alloys may be performed to produce the final elements. The assembly may include welding these parts together or welding the part to a larger element.
A tubular product as shown in
The shaped charges shown in
Advantages of embodiments may include one or more of the following. Methods may provide degradable oilfield elements that may be degraded after the objectives of using these oilfield elements have been achieved without restricting future operations in the wellbore. Embodiments can also be readily adaptable to equipment that is currently used in making these elements. Modifications of the existing methods are straightforward. Some of these methods may be performed by the vendors (suppliers/manufacturers) at their current facilities with minimal modifications to their procedures.
While various examples have been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the inventive scope as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the present and any future claims should not be unnecessarily limited by the present application.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/391,642, filed Feb. 24, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,770,261, published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009-0226340, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/033,440, filed on Mar. 4, 2008, and which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/427,233, filed Jun. 28, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,211,247, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/746,097, filed on May 1, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/771,627, filed on Feb. 9, 2006, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2261292 | Salnikov | Nov 1941 | A |
2558427 | Fagan | Jun 1951 | A |
2779136 | Hood et al. | Jan 1957 | A |
2809891 | Ennor | Oct 1957 | A |
3106959 | Huitt et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3311956 | Townsend | Apr 1967 | A |
3316748 | Lang et al. | May 1967 | A |
3348616 | Zingg | Oct 1967 | A |
3687135 | Stroganov et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3938764 | McIntyre et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3971657 | Daver | Jul 1976 | A |
4157732 | Fonner | Jun 1979 | A |
4270761 | Hertz | Jun 1981 | A |
4450136 | Dudek et al. | May 1984 | A |
4652274 | Boettcher et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4664816 | Walker | May 1987 | A |
4735632 | Oxman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4856584 | Seidner | Aug 1989 | A |
4859054 | Harrison | Aug 1989 | A |
4871008 | Dwivedi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4898239 | Rosenthal | Feb 1990 | A |
4903440 | Kirk et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906523 | Bilkadi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919209 | King | Apr 1990 | A |
4923714 | Gibb et al. | May 1990 | A |
5057600 | Beck et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5178646 | Barber, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5188183 | Hopmann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5204183 | McDougall et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5236472 | Kirk et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5284207 | Bittleston et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5355956 | Restarick | Oct 1994 | A |
5417285 | Van Buskirk et al. | May 1995 | A |
5434395 | Storck et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5479986 | Gano et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485745 | Rademaker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5526881 | Martin et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542471 | Dickinson | Aug 1996 | A |
5566757 | Carpenter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573225 | Boyle et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5709269 | Head | Jan 1998 | A |
5765641 | Shy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5826661 | Parker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5898517 | Weis | Apr 1999 | A |
5944123 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5965826 | Von Bertrab | Oct 1999 | A |
5992250 | Kluth et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009216 | Pruett et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012526 | Jennings et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024158 | Gabathuler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6062311 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079281 | Oszajca et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6145593 | Hennig | Nov 2000 | A |
6155348 | Todd | Dec 2000 | A |
6157893 | Berger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168755 | Biancaniello et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173771 | Eslinger et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192983 | Neuroth et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209646 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241021 | Bowling | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247536 | Leismer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261432 | Huber et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276454 | Fontana et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311773 | Todd et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346315 | Sawatsky | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349766 | Bussear et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349768 | Leising | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394185 | Constien | May 2002 | B1 |
6397864 | Johnson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419014 | Meek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422314 | Todd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444316 | Reddy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457525 | Scott | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474152 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494263 | Todd | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6519568 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527051 | Reddy et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531694 | Tubel et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6534449 | Gilmour et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554071 | Crook et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561270 | Budde | May 2003 | B1 |
6581455 | Berger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607036 | Ranson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6632527 | McDaniel et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6667280 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6725929 | Bissonnette et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737385 | Todd et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745159 | Todd et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6789621 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817410 | Wetzel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854522 | Brezinski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866306 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877563 | Todd et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6878782 | Merfeld et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896056 | Mendez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896058 | Munoz, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918445 | Todd et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924254 | Todd | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956099 | Pavlin | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966368 | Farquhar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968898 | Todd et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971448 | Slabaugh et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976538 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983798 | Todd | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000701 | Todd et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021383 | Todd et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036586 | Roddy et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7036588 | Munoz, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7036687 | Lowe | May 2006 | B1 |
7044220 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093664 | Todd et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7140437 | McMechan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152685 | Adnan et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7168494 | Starr et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182134 | Wetzel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207216 | Meister et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7285772 | Labous et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7322412 | Badalamenti et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322417 | Rytlewski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7353867 | Carter et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7353879 | Todd et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7581590 | Lesko et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617873 | Lovell et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726406 | Xu | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8211247 | Marya et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220554 | Jordan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8663401 | Marya et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020004060 | Heublein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007945 | Neuroth et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017386 | Ringgenberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020125008 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030070811 | Robison et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030116608 | Litwinski | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030150614 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030224165 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040040707 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043906 | Heath et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040045705 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084190 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040129418 | Jee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188090 | Vaeth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050016730 | McMechan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050121192 | Hailey, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126777 | Rolovic et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145308 | Sailer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145381 | Pollard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161222 | Haugen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173126 | Starr et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189103 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194141 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205264 | Starr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205265 | Todd et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205266 | Todd et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241824 | Burris et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050241825 | Burris, II et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050241835 | Burris et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269083 | Burris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027359 | Carter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034724 | Hamano et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035074 | Taylor | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037759 | Braddick | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042835 | Guerrero et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060044156 | Adnan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060175059 | Sinclair et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207771 | Rios et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249310 | Stowe et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266551 | Yang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070034384 | Pratt | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044958 | Rytlewski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107908 | Vaidya et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137860 | Lovell et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070181224 | Marya et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080018230 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029303 | Codazzi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066924 | Xu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079485 | Taipale et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105438 | Jordan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141826 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149345 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149351 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080236842 | Bhavsar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090025940 | Rytlewski | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050334 | Marya et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090126945 | Sharma et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151936 | Greenaway | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151949 | Marya et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226340 | Marya | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242189 | Vaidya et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090301733 | Shuster et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012708 | Steward et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018703 | Lovell et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100051275 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100209288 | Marya | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212907 | Frazier | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100252273 | Duphorne | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270031 | Patel | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110048743 | Stafford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067889 | Marya et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1141661 | Jan 1997 | CN |
1416499 | May 2003 | CN |
101326340 | Dec 2008 | CN |
2818656 | Oct 1979 | DE |
29816469 | Dec 1998 | DE |
203249 | Mar 1986 | EP |
178334 | Jul 1990 | EP |
853249 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0854439 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1051529 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1605281 | May 2006 | EP |
666281 | Feb 1952 | GB |
1187305 | Apr 1970 | GB |
2177231 | Jan 1987 | GB |
2275953 | Sep 1994 | GB |
2386627 | Sep 2003 | GB |
2432377 | May 2007 | GB |
2435046 | Aug 2007 | GB |
2457207 | Aug 2009 | GB |
2458557 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2459783 | Nov 2009 | GB |
2467090 | Jul 2010 | GB |
06228694 | Aug 1994 | JP |
11264042 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002161325 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2015187 | Jun 1994 | RU |
2073696 | Feb 1997 | RU |
2078899 | May 1997 | RU |
2122628 | Nov 1998 | RU |
2149247 | May 2000 | RU |
46031 | Jun 2005 | RU |
52996 | Apr 2006 | RU |
2296217 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2421498 | Jun 2011 | RU |
358864 | May 1966 | SU |
337425 | May 1972 | SU |
349746 | Sep 1972 | SU |
1585079 | Aug 1990 | SU |
1733617 | May 1992 | SU |
W09903515 | Jan 1999 | WO |
W00161146 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0248503 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2005090742 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006023172 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008068645 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008079485 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008079486 | Jul 2008 | WO |
W02008112260 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008079485 | Nov 2008 | WO |
W02009048822 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009064662 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Molyneux, Philip, “Water-soluble synthetic polymers: properties and behavior”, CRC Press, vol. 1, 1983, 240 pages. |
Thomson, et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation”, SPE 51177—SPE Drilling and Completion, vol. 13(3), 1998, pp. 151-156. |
Examination Report issued in United Kingdom Application No. GB1009287.2 on Jul. 21, 2011. |
Office action issued in the related Ar application 20090100760 (68.0850-Ar-Np, dated Jul. 05, 2016 (3 pp.). |
Office action issued in the related RU Application 2009107632 dated Jul. 26, 2013 (28 pages). |
Decision of Grant issued in the related RU Application 2009107632 dated Feb. 28, 2013 (21 pages). |
Answers.com, “Degrade: Definition, Synonyms”, <http://www.answers.com/topic/degrade>, Retrieved from the Internet, May 11, 2011. |
Marya Manual P. Office action issued in the related U.S. Appl. No: 11/769,230, dated Oct. 29, 2008. |
Marya Manual P. Office action issued in the related U.S. Appl. No: 11/427233, dated Jul. 24, 2009. |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2573471, dated Mar. 4, 2014 (4 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2573471, dated Mar. 19, 2013 (5 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2573471, dated Nov. 4, 2014 (4 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2573471, dated Jul. 20, 2015 (3 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2573471, dated Jul. 21, 2016 (3 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2705321, dated Nov. 28, 2014 (3 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related CA application 2705321, dated Aug. 11, 2015 (3 pages). |
Office action issued in the related EG application PCT787/2010, dated Apr. 7, 2014 (1 page) . |
Search Report issued in the related GB application 0700919.4 dated May 10, 2007 (2 pages). |
Decision of grant issued in the related RU application 2013110514, dated Jan. 16, 2015 (14 pages). |
Examination report issued in the related GC application GCC/P/2007/7739, dated Feb. 15, 2013 (11 pages). |
Office action issued in the related ID application P-00200700052, dated Apr. 5, 2017 (3 pages). |
Office action issued in the related MX application MX/a/2010/005216, dated Mar. 1, 2013 (5 pages). |
Office action issued in the related RU application 2010124372, dated Oct. 18, 2012 (12 pages). |
International Search Report and written opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2011/047296, dated Feb. 10, 2012 (13 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2011/047296, dated Feb. 12, 2013 (9 pages). |
Bishop, et al., “Solubility and properties of a poly(aryl ether ketone) in strong acids”, Macromolecules, vol. 18, No. 1, 1985, pp. 86-93. |
Lakshmi, et al., “Sulphonated poly(ether ether ketone): Synthesis and characterisation”, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 40, No. 3, Feb. 2005, pp. 629-636. |
Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “Tapered”, Definition of tapered, Merriam-Webster; http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tapered. |
Reyna-Valencia, et al., “Structural and mechanical characterization of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and sulfonated PEEK films: Effects of thermal history, sulfonation, and preparation conditions”, Journal of Applied Polymer vol. 99, No. 3, Feb. 5, 2006, pp. 756-774. |
Roovers, et al., “Synthesis and characterization of narrow molecular-weight distribution fractions of poly(aryl ether ether ketone)”, Macromolecules, vol. 23, No. 6, 1990, pp. 1611-1618. |
Wolfbeis, etal, Fiber Optic Fluorosensor for Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide, Anal. Chem, vol. 60. |
Wang, et al., “Synthesis and molecular characterization of narrow molecular weight distribution fractions of methyl-substituted poly(aryl ether ether ketone)”, Macromolecules, vol. 26, No. 15, 1993, pp. 3826-3832. |
Wei-Berk, et al., “Studies on dilute solutions of phenyl ether ketone copolymers”, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, vol. 28, No. 10, Sep. 1990, pp. 1873-1879. |
Balanyuk, “Mossbauer study and thermodynamic modeling of Fe-C-N. alloy”, Acta Materialia, vol. 48, No. 15, Sep. 2000, pp. 3813-3821. |
Gavriljuk, et al., “Nitrogen and Carbon in Austenitic and Martensitic Steels: Atomic Interactions and Structural Stability”, Materials Science Forum, vols. 426-432, Part 2, 2003, pp. 943-950. |
Jargelius-Pettersson, R.F.A., “Application of the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Concept to Some Highly Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steels”, Corrosion (USA), vol. 54, No. 2, Feb. 1998, pp. 162-168. |
Rawers, “Characterizing alloy additions to carbon high-nitrogen steel”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, vol. 218 , No. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 239-246. |
Eslinger, et al., A Hybrid Milling/Jetting Tool—The Safe Solution to Scale Milling, SPE 60700—SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas. |
Esteban, et al., Measurement of the Degree of Salinity of Water with a Fiber-Optic Sensor, Applied Optics, vol. 38(25). |
Johnson et al., An Abrasive Jetting Scale Removal System, SPE 46026—SPE/IC0TA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas. |
Office action issued in the related RU application 2013110514, dated Apr. 22, 2014 (9 pages). |
Office action issued in the related CN application 2015010901013760, dated Sep. 9, 2015 (13 pages). |
Office action issued in the related CN application 2015010901013760, dated Jan. 14, 2015 (30 pages). |
Office action received in the related CA application 2808081, dated Jan. 15, 2014 (3 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2008/082713, dated May 18, 2010 (6 pages). |
International Search Report and written opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2008/082713, dated Mar. 13, 2009 (7 pages). |
Office action issued in the related RU application 2010124372, dated Apr. 29, 2015 (10 pages). |
Office action issued in the related RU application 2010124372, dated Jan. 24, 2014 (9 pages). |
Office action issued in the related RU application 2010124372, dated Mar. 21, 2013 (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140286810 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61033440 | Mar 2008 | US | |
60746097 | May 2006 | US | |
60771627 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12391642 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 14295395 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11427233 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12391642 | US |