1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of fuel injectors, fuel injection systems and methods of operation thereof.
2. Prior Art
Fuel injector performance, particularly in diesel engines, has a substantial influence in overall engine performance, especially with respect to emissions. Of particular importance is the speed at which fuel injection can be terminated. In particular, if fuel injection is terminated merely by the reduction in injection pressure it is difficult to rapidly terminate injection because of the compressibility of the fuel and actuation fluid in an intensifier type fuel injector, resulting in a trail off in atomization resulting in unacceptable levels of unburned fuel in the exhaust. Accordingly various types of direct needle control have been proposed to provide injection control other than by controlling injection pressure.
Also fuel injectors, particularly diesel fuel injectors, are using ever increasing injection pressures, now going as high as 3000 bar (45,000 psi). Diesel fuel has a compressibility of approximately 1% per 67 bar (1000 psi), so that at the injection pressure, the fuel has been substantially compressed. In intensifier type fuel injectors, injection occurs directly as a result of intensification, so that injection begins on intensification and terminates on termination of intensification. Consequently the volume of fuel intensified is set equal to the maximum injection volume needed, plus of course some overhead volume for the needle chamber, passageways to the needle chamber, etc. At a partial power setting for the engine, much less than the maximum injection volume is needed, yet the full amount is compressed and then depressurized, losing the energy required for the compression of the fuel not injected, which at low power settings and at idle, can be most of the substantial amount of energy used for intensification. In fuel injectors having direct needle control, the operation is a bit different, in that intensification occurs, then injection by the direct needle control, then termination of injection, again by direct needle control, and then depressurization to refill the intensification chamber for the next cycle. While this cycle is a bit different, the losses of intensification energy are not different.
Injectors using direct needle control to control injection of fuel supplied to the injector at injection pressure from an external source are also known. These injection systems are more efficient because fuel, once compressed, is sooner or later all injected regardless of the engine power setting. They also have the advantage of not cycling the fuel pressure in the needle chamber on each injection event, helping reduce, but not eliminate, the possibility of eventual injector tip breakage. However such systems have serious drawbacks. Aside from the safety issues of having a rail at injection pressures and the associated plumbing problems, there is a serious risk to the engine, in that if an injection tip breaks off, a direct and continuous flow path from the high pressure rail to the combustion chamber is provided, which could result in a hydraulic lock of the engine with catastrophic results.
Also known are methods of operation of intensifier type fuel injectors whereby a quantity of fuel is intensified by an intensifier and injection is controlled by direct needle control with the intensifier still being active until the remaining intensified fuel is less than needed for the next injection event or a portion of an injection event, at which time the intensifier is deactivated to refill the intensifier with fuel. Then the intensifier is activated again for subsequent injection events under control of the direct needle control. In U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0012745, a substantial storage volume for intensifier fuel is also provided in the injector. See also U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0277504. These methods of operation of fuel injectors are highly efficient, but it has been discovered, can be improved.
In accordance with the present invention, the prior art method of intensifying a quantity of fuel and controlling the injection by direct needle control while the intensifier remains activated is modified to intensifying a quantity of fuel, then isolating the intensified fuel from the intensifier and keeping it isolated during subsequent injection events or injection sub-events. Such operation has been found to have a number of advantages over the prior art. Specifically, such operation has been found to control and greatly reduce pressure spikes in the intensified fuel which can cause mechanical deterioration of the injector. Also an injector operating in the prior art manner exhibits an undesired lack of repeatability, perhaps not detectable to one not looking closely, but which is in fact present, limiting the extent to which the performance of each cylinder of a multi-cylinder engine can be equalized. These effects may arise in part from the presence of a valve (preferably a check valve) between the intensifier and the bulk of intensified fuel, which when the intensifier is maintained active during injection, will partially or fully open during injection because of intensified fuel flow from the intensifier, with the check valve slamming shut after an injection event or injection sub-event because of the pressure spikes arising from the compressibility of the fuel, the pressures involved and speed of operation of the needle. Whatever the cause, it has been found that simply assuring that the check valve (or other valve) between the intensifier output and the bulk of the intensified fuel is closed during each injection event or injection sub-event controls and limits the pressure spike, which makes the injector operation very repeatable. This in turn allows the adjustment of the injection, cycle to cycle, so that the pressure profiles in the cylinders of a multi-cylinder engine can be made to be substantially equal to each other in amplitude, shape and timing with respect to crank angle.
Thus the present invention is a new method of operating an intensifier type injector, such as a prior art intensifier type injector, to obtain substantially enhanced useful life and operating characteristics. Accordingly a prior art intensifier type injector that may be used with the present invention will be first described, and then more details of the invention will be described.
In the description to follow, the phrase “injection event” refers to a complete injection event, which may comprise injection sub-events, such as, by way of one example, a pre-injection that will be followed by a main injection, either as a single main injection, or a series of smaller injections. An injection event may begin at any time after the end of a combustion cycle (power stroke) and will end before the end of the next combustion cycle (power stroke). Thus successive injection events in an engine operating in a two stroke or two cycle mode will occur on each engine crankshaft rotation (each 360 degrees of crankshaft rotation), while successive injection events in an engine operating in a four stroke or four cycle mode will occur on each pair of engine crankshaft rotations (each 720 degrees of crankshaft rotation).
First referring to
A second smaller spool valve generally indicated by the numeral 40 is coupled to the side of the injector for direct needle control. In a preferred embodiment, spool valve 40 is a three-way magnetically latching spool valve, magnetically latching on actuation, and releasing for spring return on receipt of a small reverse current, though other types of valves, including other spool valves may be used if desired. In the embodiment disclosed, the valve either couples actuation fluid pressure in line 42 to line 44 when actuated, or alternatively, blocks the flow of actuation fluid in line 42 and couples line 44 to a low pressure vent 46 when the spool is released. The area above piston 48 is permanently coupled to the source of actuation fluid under pressure, and accordingly is always pressurized when the engine is running. Through the three-way valve 40, pressure in line 44 controllably pressurizes the region under piston 48, which in turn controls actuator pin 24. For piston 48 and the intensifier, the actuation fluid is preferably engine oil, though some other actuation fluid may be used, such as fuel.
In the prior art, in operation, with the area under piston 48 vented, spring 22 and actuation fluid pressure above piston 48 will hold the needle closed, even against intensified fuel pressure in the needle chamber. When injection is to occur, needle control valve 40 is actuated to couple actuation fluid pressure to the region below piston 48, which pressure balances the piston 48, allowing intensified fuel pressure in the needle chamber to force the needle open against spring 22. Of course at the end of injection, the needle control valve 40 is released to again vent the area under piston 48 to allow actuation fluid pressure over piston 48 to force the needle closed. Of course the needle control valve 40 may be operated more than once, first to provide a pre-injection, followed by a second injection, or even to provide pulsed injections.
Of particular importance to the present invention are the large storage volumes 50, also shown in the cross section of
The electronic control system that controls injection may also keep track of the amount of fuel injected on each injection event, and recycle the intensifier when required. Correction of the electronic control system for its errors in the amount of fuel injected on each injection event, if desired, may be made for each intensification cycle by obtaining some measure of the intensification pressure itself, such as by providing a measure of the intensifier actuation fluid pressure on the intensifier piston during intensification, and by limiting the stroke of the intensifier piston and plunger to slightly less than the maximum allowable, and sensing the intensifier piston and plunger position at the end of the intensifier intensification stroke. This may be done, by way of example, by using a hall-effect sensor or an electromagnetic sensor, and using the actuation fluid pressure times the intensification ratio as a measure of the intensified fuel pressure. Now a longer than expected stroke in comparison to the stroke expected for the amount of intensified fuel that was estimated to be needed to replenish the amount of fuel that was injected since the last intensification cycle is somewhat greater than estimated by the controller, so that appropriate corrections may be made in keeping track of the fuel injected after the last intensification cycle.
At idle and during low power settings, the intensifier need only be recycled after numerous injection events. Even at a maximum power setting, preferably (but not necessarily) the storage provided is adequate for multiple injection events. Depending on the relative volumes, initially the intensifier will likely need to be cycled more than once to adequately pressurize the fuel in the storage volume 50.
The present invention provides all the advantages and eliminates the disadvantages of a fuel rail at high injection pressures, and also substantially eliminates the high pressure spikes and improves the repeatability of the injector over that of injectors operated in accordance with U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0012745. In that regard, preferably the fuel in the total storage volume 50, after decompressing, is less than that that would cause a hydraulic lock in the engine cylinder if dumped into the cylinder on breakage of the injector tip. Also, the storage volume should not be so large as to jeopardize the structural integrity of the injector. Of course, while one exemplary form of direct needle control has been disclosed for purposes of setting the environment for the present invention, substantially any form of direct needle control may be used. Also while the check valve 54 is shown as a ball valve, other forms of check valves may also be used.
The exemplary embodiment of the injector disclosed herein also uses intensifier actuation fluid for direct needle control. Alternatively, intensified fuel pressure may be used for direct needle control. This is not preferred however, because of the valving difficulties at the intensified pressure. Of course, substantially any method of direct needle control may be used with the present invention, as it is the combination of direct needle control, however done, together with the ability to store fuel at the intensified pressure in isolation from the intensifier during injection, that provides the repeatability, efficiency and durability characteristics of the present invention.
Now referring to
In the embodiment of
The operation of the embodiment of
Again, the method of operating an injector with intensified fuel storage in accordance with the present invention is to operate the intensifier between injection events, or even injection sub-events if time allows, to provide intensified fuel to the intensified fuel storage volume, and then to isolate that stored intensified fuel from the intensifier before or as the intensifier is returned to its un-actuated position in readiness for its next intensification stroke. If a simple check valve such as a ball check valve is used for that isolation, the check valve will close as the intensifier is returned to its un-actuated position in readiness for its next intensification stroke.
Thus, like the method disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0012745, the present invention method can very substantially reduce the energy loss of other types of prior art intensifier type fuel injectors and methods of operation by minimizing the fraction of the fuel that is raised to the intensified pressure but not injected, yet greatly reduces the pressure spikes and increases the repeatability of an injector with intensified fuel storage in comparison to the method of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0012745, all with an increase in durability of the injectors used because of the limiting of the pressure spikes. In that regard, the pressure spikes put unnecessary forces on the injector tip, which can lead to a premature failure of the tip.
While certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made in the method and in the injector used to practice the method without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1701089 | von Salis | Feb 1929 | A |
2537087 | Pyk et al. | Jan 1951 | A |
2606066 | Thompson | Aug 1952 | A |
2722924 | Hedges | Nov 1955 | A |
3640466 | Steiger | Feb 1972 | A |
4006859 | Thoma | Feb 1977 | A |
4173208 | Fenne et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4219154 | Luscomb | Aug 1980 | A |
4256064 | Thorn | Mar 1981 | A |
4440132 | Terada et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4627571 | Kato et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4628881 | Beck et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4782794 | Hsu et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4821689 | Tittizer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4856713 | Burnett | Aug 1989 | A |
5108070 | Tominaga | Apr 1992 | A |
5237976 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241935 | Beck et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5341783 | Beck et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5419492 | Gant et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421521 | Gibson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423484 | Zuo | Jun 1995 | A |
5429309 | Stockner | Jul 1995 | A |
5440968 | Sekine | Aug 1995 | A |
5441027 | Buchanon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5460329 | Sturman | Oct 1995 | A |
5463996 | Maley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5529044 | Barnes et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
RE35303 | Miller et al. | Jul 1996 | E |
5551398 | Gibson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5638781 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5640987 | Sturman | Jun 1997 | A |
5641121 | Beck et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5669355 | Gibson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673669 | Maley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682858 | Chen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687693 | Chen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697342 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713316 | Sturman | Feb 1998 | A |
5722373 | Paul et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727525 | Tsuzuki | Mar 1998 | A |
5732679 | Takahasi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738075 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752659 | Moncelle | May 1998 | A |
5771865 | Ishida | Jun 1998 | A |
5779149 | Hayes, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5806474 | Paul et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826562 | Chen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833146 | Hefler | Nov 1998 | A |
5873526 | Cooke | Feb 1999 | A |
5906351 | Aardema et al. | May 1999 | A |
5941215 | Augustin | Aug 1999 | A |
5950931 | Beatty et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954030 | Sturman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960753 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
5970956 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
5979803 | Peters et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012430 | Cooke | Jan 2000 | A |
6012644 | Sturman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026785 | Zuo | Feb 2000 | A |
6027047 | Augustin | Feb 2000 | A |
6047899 | Graves | Apr 2000 | A |
6085991 | Sturman | Jul 2000 | A |
6112721 | Kouketsu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6113000 | Tian | Sep 2000 | A |
6113014 | Coldren et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119960 | Graves | Sep 2000 | A |
6148778 | Sturman | Nov 2000 | A |
6161770 | Sturman | Dec 2000 | A |
6173685 | Sturman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6257499 | Sturman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308690 | Sturman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328003 | Gaertner et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360728 | Sturman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374784 | Tischer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378497 | Keyster et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6412706 | Guerrassi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415749 | Sturman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6474304 | Lei | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6550453 | Tian | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557506 | Sturman | May 2003 | B2 |
6575126 | Sturman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575384 | Ricco | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592050 | Boecking | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6647966 | Tian et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655355 | Kropp et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684853 | Lei | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6684856 | Tanabe et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6684857 | Boecking | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722127 | Scuderi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745958 | Lei | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766792 | Messinger et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769635 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776138 | Mahr et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802298 | Yoshimura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811103 | Gurich et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830202 | Coldren | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845926 | Lei | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6868831 | Lei | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880501 | Suh et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908040 | Dong et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910462 | Sun et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910463 | Oshizawa et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918358 | Hu | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951204 | Shafer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7108200 | Sturman | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7182068 | Sturman et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7278593 | Wang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293547 | Ibrahim | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7412969 | Pena et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7568632 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7568633 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7694891 | Sturman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717359 | Sturman | May 2010 | B2 |
7753037 | Hatamura | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7841324 | Dirker et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020053340 | Lei | May 2002 | A1 |
20030155437 | Lei | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178508 | Coldren | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183198 | Mahr et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196646 | Shoyama et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040000600 | Peters et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040129255 | Stuhldreher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140161 | Clancy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168673 | Shinogle | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188537 | Sturman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195385 | Lawrence et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238657 | Sturman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066918 | Yamakawa et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092306 | Shinogle et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060032940 | Boecking | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075995 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123773 | Zhang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150931 | Sturman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060150954 | Moore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157581 | Kiss et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060243253 | Knight | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070209615 | Epshteyn | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070251220 | Dawson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272221 | Branyon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080277504 | Sturman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090056670 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090151686 | Nguyen | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090283061 | Branyon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100012745 | Sturman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100186716 | Sturman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110094462 | Durrett et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110163177 | Kiss | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130075498 | Sturman | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10250130 | Mar 2004 | DE |
102004030447 | Jan 2006 | DE |
102005028400 | Feb 2006 | DE |
102005060647 | Jun 2006 | DE |
1593839 | Nov 2005 | EP |
61008459 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61096169 | May 1986 | JP |
WO-02073024 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-2006008727 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2008141237 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance Dated Nov. 21, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,044. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 10, 2013; Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136227.6. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 25, 2013; European Patent Application No. 09790488.2. |
Advisory Action Dated May 29, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,118. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Dated Aug. 21, 2008, International Application No. PCT/US2008/063321. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Dated Jan. 25, 2010, International Application No. PCT/US2009/050736. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Dec. 30, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/118,542. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jun. 27, 2011, Chinese Patent Application No. 200880015290.X. |
Office Action Dated Jul. 13, 2012, European Patent Application No. 09790488.2. |
Office Action Dated Sep. 13, 2011, European Patent Application No. 09790488.2. |
Office Action Dated Aug. 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,827. |
Office Action Dated Aug. 31, 2012; Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136227.6. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 31, 2010, Chinese Patent Application No. 200880015290.X. |
Office Action Dated Dec. 5, 2012, Chinese Patent Application No. 201110259364.8. |
Office Action Dated Mar. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,118. |
Office Action Dated May 22, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,827. |
Office Action Dated Nov. 7, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,118. |
Restriction Requirement Dated Mar. 12, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,044. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Dated Jun. 24, 2014; International Application No. PCT/US2013/070628. |
Office Action Dated Aug. 28, 2014; European Patent Application No. 09790488.2. |
Notification on Grant of Patent Right for Invention Dated May 30, 2013; Chinese Patent Application No. 201110259364.8. |
Office Action Dated Apr. 22, 2013; Chinese Patent Application No. 200980136227.6. |
Office Action Dated Apr. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,044. |
Notice of Allowance Mailed Jul. 5, 2013; U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,118. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140138454 A1 | May 2014 | US |