Methods of providing or using a storage unit for a fracturing operation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE50166
  • Patent Number
    RE50,166
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 2, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
Methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations are disclosed. A modular integrated material blending and storage system includes a first module comprising a storage unit, a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit. The system further includes a third module comprising a pre-gel blender. An output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender and gravity directs the contents of the first module, the second module and the third module to the blender. The system also includes a pump that directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location. The pump may be powered by natural gas or electricity.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.


Oilfield operations are conducted in a variety of different locations and involve a number of equipments, depending on the operations at hand. The requisite materials for the different operations are often hauled to and stored at the well site where the operations are to be performed.


Considering the number of equipments necessary for performing oilfield operations and ground conditions at different oilfield locations, space availability is often a constraint. For instance, in well treatment operations such as fracturing operations, several wells may be serviced from a common jobsite pad. In such operations, the necessary equipment is not moved from well site to well site. Instead, the equipment may be located at a central work pad and the required treating fluids may be pumped to the different well sites from this central location. Accordingly, the bulk of materials required at a centralized work pad may be enormous, further limiting space availability.


Typically, in modem well treatment operations, equipment is mounted on a truck or a trailer and brought to location and set up. The storage units used are filled with the material required to prepare the well treatment fluid and perform the well treatment. In order to prepare the well treatment fluid, the material used is then transferred from the storage units to one or more blenders to prepare the desired well treatment fluid which may then be pumped down hole.


For instance, in conventional fracturing operations a blender and a pre-gel blender are set between the high pressure pumping units and the storage units which contain the dry materials and chemicals used. The dry materials and the chemicals used in the fracturing operations are then transferred, often over a long distance, from the storage units to the mixing and blending equipments. Once the treating process is initiated, the solid materials and chemicals are typically conveyed to the blender by a combination of conveyer belts, screw type conveyers and a series of hoses and pumps.


The equipment used for transferring the dry materials and chemicals from the storage units to the blender occupy valuable space at the job site. Additionally, the transfer of dry materials and chemicals to the blender consumes a significant amount of energy as well as other system resources and contributes to the carbon foot print of the job site. Moreover, in typical “on land” operations the entire equipment spread including the high horsepower pumping units are powered by diesel fired engines and the bulk material metering, conveying and pumping is done with diesel fired hydraulic systems. Emissions from the equipment that is powered by diesel fuel contributes to the overall carbon footprint and adversely affects the environment.





FIGURES

Some specific example embodiments of the disclosure may be understood by referring, in part, to the following description and the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a top view of an Integrated Material Storage and Blending System in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view of an Integrated Pre-gel Blender in accordance with a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a cross sectional view of an Integrated Pre-gel Blender in accordance with a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a cross sectional view of an Integrated Pre-gel Blender in accordance with a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 depicts a close up view of the interface between the storage units and a blender in an Integrated Material Storage and Blending System in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is an isometric view of an Integrated Material Storage and Blending System in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a pumping system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.





While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted and described and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.


SUMMARY

The present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.


In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a storage unit; a blender located under the storage unit; wherein the blender is operable to receive a first input from the storage unit; a liquid additive storage module having a pump to maintain constant pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage module; wherein the blender is operable to receive a second input from the liquid additive storage module; and a pre-gel blender; wherein the blender is operable to receive a third input from the pre-gel blender; wherein gravity directs the contents of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module and the pre-gel blender to the blender; a first pump; and a second pump; wherein the first pump directs the contents of the blender to the second pump; and wherein the second pump directs the contents of the blender down hole; wherein at least one of the first pump and the second pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.


In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention is directed to a modular integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a first module comprising a storage unit; a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit; and a third module comprising a pre-gel blender; wherein an output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender; and wherein gravity directs the contents of the first module, the second module and the third module to the blender; a pump; wherein the pump directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location; and wherein the pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.


The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of exemplary embodiments, which follows.


DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.


Turning now to FIG. 1, an Integrated Material Storage and Blending System (IMSBS) in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is depicted generally with reference numeral 100. The IMSBS 100 includes a number of storage units 102. The storage units 102 may contain sand, proppants or other solid materials used to prepare a desired well treatment fluid.


In one exemplary embodiment, the storage units 102 may be connected to load sensors (not shown) to monitor the reaction forces at the legs of the storage units 102. The load sensor readings may then be used to monitor the change in weight, mass and/or volume of materials in the storage units 102. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the storage units 102 during well treatment operations. As a result, the load sensors may be used to ensure the availability of materials during oilfield operations. In one exemplary embodiment, load cells may be used as load sensors. Electronic load cells are preferred for their accuracy and are well known in the art, but other types of force-measuring devices may be used. As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, any type of load-sensing device can be used in place of or in conjunction with a load cell. Examples of suitable load-measuring devices include weight-, mass-, pressure- or force-measuring devices such as hydraulic load cells, scales, load pins, dual sheer beam load cells, strain gauges and pressure transducers. Standard load cells are available in various ranges such as 0-5000 pounds, 0-10000 pounds, etc.


In one exemplary embodiment the load sensors may be communicatively coupled to an information handling system 104 which may process the load sensor readings. While FIG. 1 depicts a separate information handling system 104 for each storage unit 102, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, a single information handling system may be used for all or any combination of the storage units 102. Although FIG. 1 depicts a personal computer as the information handling system 104, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the information handling system 104 may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, the information handling system 104 may be a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. For instance, in one exemplary embodiment, the information handling system 104 may be used to monitor the amount of materials in the storage units 102 over time and/or alert a user when the contents of a storage unit 102 reaches a threshold level. The user may designate a desired sampling interval at which the information handling system 104 may take a reading of the load sensors.


The information handling system 104 may then compare the load sensor readings to the threshold value to determine if the threshold value is reached. If the threshold value is reached, the information handling system 104 may alert the user. In one embodiment, the information handling system 104 may provide a real-time visual depiction of the amount of materials contained in the storage units 102. Moreover, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the load sensors may be coupled to the information handling system 104 through a wired or wireless (not shown) connection.


As depicted in FIG. 1, the IMSBS 100 may also include one or more Integrated Pre-gel Blenders (IPB) 106. The IPB 106 may be used for preparing any desirable well treatment fluids such as a fracturing fluid, a sand control fluid or any other fluid requiring hydration time.



FIG. 2 depicts an IPB 200 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The IPB 200 comprises a pre-gel storage unit 202 resting on legs 204. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the pre-gel storage unit 202 may be a storage bin, a tank, or any other desirable storage unit. The pre-gel storage unit 202 may contain the gel powder used for preparing the gelled fracturing fluid. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the gel powder may comprise a dry polymer. Specifically, the dry polymer may be any agent used to enhance fluid properties, including, but not limited to, wg18, wg35, wg36 (available from Halliburton Energy Services of Duncan, Okla.) or any other guar or modified guar gelling agents. The materials from the pre-gel storage unit 202 may be directed to a mixer 206 as a first input through a feeder 208. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment, the mixer 206 may be a growler mixer and the feeder 208 may be a screw feeder which may be used to provide a volumetric metering of the materials directed to the mixer 206. A water pump 210 may be used to supply water to the mixer 206 as a second input. A variety of different pumps may be used as the water pump 210 depending on the user preferences. For instance, the water pump 210 may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. The mixer 206 mixes the gel powder from the pre-gel storage unit 202 with the water from the water pump 210 at the desired concentration and the finished gel is discharged from the mixer 206 and may be directed to a storage unit, such as an external frac tank (not shown), for hydration. The finished gel may then be directed to a blender 108 in the IMSBS 100.


In one exemplary embodiment, the legs 204 of the pre-gel storage unit 202 are attached to load sensors 212 to monitor the reaction forces at the legs 204. The load sensor 212 readings may then be used to monitor the change in weight, mass and/or volume of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 202. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the pre-gel storage unit 202 at a given set point. As a result, the load sensors 212 may be used to ensure the availability of materials during oilfield operations. In one exemplary embodiment, load cells may be used as load sensors 212. Electronic load cells are preferred for their accuracy and are well known in the art, but other types of force-measuring devices may be used. As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, any type of load-sensing device can be used in place of or in conjunction with a load cell. Examples of suitable load-measuring devices include weight-, mass-, pressure- or force-measuring devices such as hydraulic load cells, scales, load pins, dual sheer beam load cells, strain gauges and pressure transducers. Standard load cells are available in various ranges such as 0-5000 pounds, 0-10000 pounds, etc.


In one exemplary embodiment the load sensors 212 may be communicatively coupled to an information handling system 214 which may process the load sensor readings. Although FIG. 2 depicts a personal computer as the information handling system 214, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the information handling system 214 may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, the information handling system 214 may be a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. For instance, in one exemplary embodiment, the information handling system 214 may be used to monitor the amount of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 202 over time and/or alert a user when the contents of the pre-gel storage unit 202 reaches a threshold level. The user may designate a desired sampling interval at which the information handling system 214 may take a reading of the load sensors 212. The information handling system 214 may then compare the load sensor readings to the threshold value to determine if the threshold value is reached. If the threshold value is reached, the information handling system 214 may alert the user. In one embodiment, the information handling system 214 may provide a real-time visual depiction of the amount of materials contained in the pre-gel storage unit 202.


Moreover, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the load sensors 212 may be coupled to the information handling system 214 through a wired or wireless (not shown) connection. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one exemplary embodiment, the dry polymer material may be replaced with a Liquid Gel Concentrate (“LGC”) material that consists of the dry polymer mixed in a carrier fluid. In this exemplary embodiment, the feeder and mixer mechanisms would be replaced with a metering pump of suitable construction to inject the LGC into the water stream, thus initiating the hydration process.



FIG. 3 depicts an IPB in accordance with a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention, denoted generally by reference numeral 300. The IPB 300 comprises a pre-gel storage unit 302 resting on legs 308. The pre-gel storage unit 302 in this embodiment may include a central core 304 for storage and handling of materials. In one embodiment, the central core 304 may be used to store a dry gel powder for making gelled fracturing fluids. The pre-gel storage unit 302 may further comprise an annular space 306 for hydration volume. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the gel powder may comprise a dry polymer. Specifically, the dry polymer may comprise a number of different materials, including, but not limited to, wg18, wg35, wg36 (available from Halliburton Energy Services of Duncan, Okla.) or any other guar or modified guar gelling agents.


The materials from the central core 304 of the pre-gel storage unit 302 may be directed to a mixer 310 as a first input through a feeder 312. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment, the mixer 310 may be a growler mixer and the feeder 312 may be a screw feeder which may be used to provide a volumetric metering of the materials directed to the mixer 310. A water pump 314 may be used to supply water to the mixer 310 as a second input. A variety of different pumps may be used as the water pump 314 depending on the user preferences. For instance, the water pump 314 may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. The mixer 310 mixes the gel powder from the pre-gel storage unit 302 with the water from the water pump 314 at the desired concentration and the finished gel is discharged from the mixer 310. As discussed above with reference to the storage units 102, the pre-gel storage unit 302 may rest on load sensors 316 which may be used for monitoring the amount of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 302. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the pre-gel storage unit 302 at a given set point.


In this embodiment, once the gel having the desired concentration is discharged from the mixer 310, it is directed to the annular space 306. The gel mixture is maintained in the annular space 306 for hydration. Once sufficient time has passed and the gel is hydrated, it is discharged from the annular space 306 through the discharge line 318.



FIG. 4 depicts a cross sectional view of a storage unit in an IPB 400 in accordance with a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The IPB 400 comprises a pre-gel storage unit 402 resting on legs 404. The pre-gel storage unit 402 in this embodiment may include a central core 406 for storage and handling of materials. In one embodiment, the central core 406 may be used to store a dry gel powder for making gelled fracturing fluids. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the gel powder may comprise a dry polymer. Specifically, the dry polymer may be any agent used to enhance fluid properties, including, but not limited to, wg18, wg35, wg36 (available from Halliburton Energy Services of Duncan, Okla.) or any other guar or modified guar gelling agents. The pre-gel storage unit 402 may further comprise an annular space 408 which may be used as a hydration volume. In this embodiment, the annular space 408 contains a tubular hydration loop 410.


The materials from the central core 406 of the pre-gel storage unit 402 may be directed to a mixer 412 as a first input through a feeder 414. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment, the mixer 412 may be a growler mixer and the feeder 414 may be a screw feeder which may be used to provide a volumetric metering of the materials directed to the mixer 412. A water pump 416 may be used to supply water to the mixer 412 as a second input. A variety of different pumps may be used as the water pump 416 depending on the user preferences. For instance, the water pump 416 may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. The mixer 412 mixes the gel powder from the pre-gel storage unit 402 with the water from the water pump 416 at the desired concentration and the finished gel is discharged from the mixer 412. As discussed above with reference to FIG. 1, the pre-gel storage unit 402 may rest on load sensors 418 which may be used for monitoring the amount of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 402. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the pre-gel storage unit 402 at a given set point.


In this embodiment, once the gel having the desired concentration is discharged from the mixer 412, it is directed to the annular space 408 where it enters the tubular hydration loop 410. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the portions of the gel mixture are discharged from the mixer 412 at different points in time, and accordingly, will be hydrated at different times. Specifically, a portion of the gel mixture discharged from the mixer 412 into the annular space 408 at a first point in time, t1, will be sufficiently hydrated before a portion of the gel mixture which is discharged into the annular space 408 at a second point in time, t2. Accordingly, it is desirable to ensure that the gel mixture is transferred through the annular space 408 in a First-In-First-Out (FIFO) mode. To that end, in the third exemplary embodiment, a tubular hydration loop 410 is inserted in the annular space 408 to direct the flow of the gel as it is being hydrated.


As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in order to achieve optimal performance, the tubular hydration loop 410 may need to be cleaned during a job or between jobs. In one embodiment, the tubular hydration loop 410 may be cleaned by passing a fluid such as water through it. In another exemplary embodiment, a pigging device may be used to clean the tubular hydration loop 410.


Returning to FIG. 1, the IMSBS 100 may include one or more blenders 108 located at the bottom of the storage units 102. In one embodiment, multiple storage units 102 may be positioned above a blender 108 and be operable to deliver solid materials to the blender 108. FIG. 5 depicts a close up view of the interface between the storage units 102 and the blender 108. As depicted in FIG. 5, gravity directs the solid materials from the storage units 102 to the blender 108 through the hopper 502, obviating the need for a conveyer system.


Returning to FIG. 1, the IMSBS 100 may also include one or more liquid additive storage modules 110. The liquid additive storage modules 110 may contain a fluid used in preparing the desired well treatment fluid. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, depending on the well treatment fluid being prepared, a number of different fluids may be stored in the liquid additive storage modules 110. Such fluids may include, but are not limited to, surfactants, acids, cross-linkers, breakers, or any other desirable chemical additives. As discussed in detail with respect to storage units 102, load sensors (not shown) may be used to monitor the amount of fluid in the liquid additive storage modules 110 in real time and meter the amount of fluids delivered to the blender 108. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, a pump may be used to circulate the contents and maintain constant pressure at the head of the liquid additive storage modules 110. Because the pressure of the fluid at the outlet of the liquid additive storage modules 110 is kept constant and the blender 108 is located beneath the liquid additive storage modules 110, gravity assists in directing the fluid from the liquid additive storage modules 110 to the blender 108, thereby obviating the need for a pump or other conveyor systems to transfer the fluid.


As depicted in more detail in FIG. 5, the blender 108 includes a fluid inlet 112 and an optional water inlet 504. Once the desired materials are mixed in the blender 108, the materials exit the blender 108 through the outlet 114.


In one embodiment, when preparing a well treatment fluid, a base gel is prepared in the IPB 106. In one embodiment, the gel prepared in the IPB may be directed to an annular space 406 for hydration. In another exemplary embodiment, the annular space may further include a hydration loop 410. In one exemplary embodiment, the resulting gel from the IPB 106 may be pumped to the centrally located blender 108. Each of the base gel, the fluid modifying agents and the solid components used in preparing a desired well treatment fluid may be metered out from the IPB 106, the liquid additive storage module 110 and the storage unit 102, respectively. The blender 108 mixes the base gel with other fluid modifying agents from the liquid additive storage modules 110 and the solid component(s) from the storage units 102. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, when preparing a fracturing fluid the solid component may be a dry proppant. In one exemplary embodiment, the dry proppant may be gravity fed into the blending tub through metering gates. Once the blender 108 mixes the base gel, the fluid modifying agent and the solid component(s), the resulting well treatment fluid may be directed to a down hole pump (not shown) through the outlet 114. A variety of different pumps may be used to pump the output of the IMSBS down hole. For instance, the pump used may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. In one exemplary embodiment, chemicals from the liquid additive storage modules 110 may be injected in the manifolds leading to and exiting the blender 108 in order to bring them closer to the centrifugal pumps and away from other chemicals when there are compatibility or reaction issues.


As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the mixing and blending process may be accomplished at the required rate dictated by the job parameters. As a result, pumps that transfer the final slurry to the down hole pumps typically have a high horsepower requirement. FIG. 7 depicts a pumping system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, denoted generally with reference numeral 700. In one exemplary embodiment, shown in FIG. 7, the transfer pump 702 may be powered by a natural gas fired engine or a natural gas fired generator set 714. In another exemplary embodiment, the transfer pump may be powered by electricity from a power grid. Once the fluid system is mixed and blended with proppant and other fluid modifiers it is boosted to the high horsepower down hole pumps 704. The down hole pumps pump the slurry through the high pressure ground manifold 706 to the well head 708 and down hole. In one embodiment, the down hole pumps 704 may be powered by a natural gas fired engine, a natural gas fired generator set 714 or electricity from a power grid 716. The down hole pumps typically account for over two third of the horsepower on location, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of the overall operations.


In one exemplary embodiment, the natural gas used to power the transfer pumps, the down hole pumps or the other system components may be obtained from the field on which the subterranean operations are being performed 720. In one embodiment, the natural gas may be converted to liquefied natural gas 712 and used to power pumps and other equipment that would typically be powered by diesel fuel. In another embodiment, the natural gas may be used to provide power through generator sets 714. The natural gas from the field may undergo conditioning 710 before being used to provide power to the pumps and other equipment. The conditioning process may include cleaning the natural gas, compressing the natural gas in compressor stations and if necessary, removing any water contained therein.


As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the IMSBS may include a different number of storage units 102, IPBs 106 and/or liquid additive storage modules 110, depending on the system requirements. For instance, in another exemplary embodiment (not shown), the IMSBS may include three storage units, one IPB and one liquid additive storage module.



FIG. 6 depicts an isometric view of IMSBS in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, denoted generally with reference numeral 600. As depicted in FIG. 6, each of the storage units 602, each of the liquid additive storage modules 604 and each of the IPBs 606 may be arranged as an individual module. In one embodiment, one or more of the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and the IPBs 606 may include a latch system which is couplable to a truck or trailer which may be used for transporting the module. In one embodiment, the storage units 602 may be a self-erecting storage unit as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/235,270, assigned to Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Accordingly, the storage units 602 may be specially adapted to connect to a vehicle which may be used to lower, raise and transport the storage unit 602. Once at a jobsite, the storage unit 602 may be erected and filled with a predetermined amount of a desired material. A similar design may be used in conjunction with each of the modules of the IMSBS 600 disclosed herein in order to transport the modules to and from a job site. Once the desired number of storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and the IPBs 606 are delivered to a job site, they are erected in their vertical position. Dry materials such as proppants or gel powder may then be filled pneumatically to the desired level and liquid chemicals may be pumped into the various storage tanks. Load sensors (not shown) may be used to monitor the amount of materials added to the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and the IPBs 606 in real time.


As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, an IMSBS 600 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention which permits accurate, real-time monitoring of the contents of the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and/or the IPBs 606 provides several advantages. For instance, an operator may use the amount of materials remaining in the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and/or the IPBs 606 as a quality control mechanism to ensure that material consumption is in line with the job requirements. Additionally, the accurate, real-time monitoring of material consumption expedites the operator's ability to determine the expenses associated with a job.


As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the different equipment used in an IMSBS in accordance with the present invention may be powered by any suitable power source. For instance, the equipment may be powered by a combustion engine, electric power supply which may be provided by an on-site generator or by a hydraulic power supply.


Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While the invention has been depicted and described by reference to exemplary embodiments of the invention, such a reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The invention is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent arts and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of the invention are exemplary only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the invention. Consequently, the invention is intended to be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects. The terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee.

Claims
  • 1. An integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a storage unit;a blender located under the storage unit;wherein the blender is operable to receive a first input from the storage unit through a hopper;a liquid additive storage module having a first pump to maintain constant pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage module;wherein the blender is operable to receive a second input from the liquid additive storage module; anda pre-gel blender, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises at least a pre-gel storage unit resting on a leg, further wherein the pre-gel storage unit comprises a central core and an annular space, wherein the annular space hydrates the contents of the pre-gel blender;wherein the blender is operable to receive a third input from the pre-gel blender;wherein gravity directs the contents of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module and the pre-gel blender to the blender;a second pump; anda third pump;wherein the second pump directs the contents of the blender to the third pump; andwherein the third pump directs the contents of the blender down hole;wherein at least one of the second pump and the third pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the storage unit comprises a load sensor.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises: a feeder coupling the pre-gel storage unit to a first input of a mixer; a fourth pump coupled to a second input of the mixer;wherein the pre-gel storage unit contains a solid component of a well treatment fluid;wherein the feeder supplies the solid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer;wherein the fourth pump supplies a fluid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer; and wherein the mixer outputs a well treatment fluid.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is a gelled fracturing fluid.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the solid component is a gel powder.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the fluid component is water.
  • 7. The system of claim 3, wherein the central core contains the solid component of the well treatment fluid.
  • 8. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed to the annular space.
  • 9. The system of claim 3, wherein the annular space comprises a tubular hydration loop.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed from the mixer to the tubular hydration loop.
  • 11. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is selected from the group consisting of a fracturing fluid and a sand control fluid.
  • 12. The system of claim 3, further comprising a power source to power at least one of the feeder, the mixer and the pump.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the power source is selected from the group consisting of a combustion engine, an electric power supply and a hydraulic power supply.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein one of the combustion engine, the electric power supply and the hydraulic power supply is powered by natural gas.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, further comprising a load sensor coupled to one of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module or the pre-gel blender.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, further comprising an information handling system communicatively coupled to the load sensor.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the load sensor is a load cell.
  • 18. The system of claim 15, wherein a reading of the load sensor is used for quality control.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the electricity is derived from one of a power grid and a natural gas generator set.
  • 20. A modular integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a first module comprising a storage unit;a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a first pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit; anda third module comprising a pre-gel blender, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises at least a pre-gel storage unit resting on a leg, further wherein the pre-gel storage unit comprises a central core and an annular space, wherein the annular space hydrates the contents of the pre-gel blender;wherein an output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender; andwherein gravity directs the contents of the first module through a hopper, the second module and the third module to the blender;a second pump;wherein the second pump directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location; andwherein the second pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
  • 21. The system of claim 20, wherein each of the first module, the second module and the third module is a self erecting module.
  • 22. The system of claim 20, wherein the third module comprises: a feeder coupling the pre-gel storage unit to a first input of a mixer;a third pump coupled to a second input of the mixer;wherein the pre-gel storage unit contains a solid component of a well treatment fluid;wherein the feeder supplies the solid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer;wherein the third pump supplies a fluid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer; andwherein the mixer outputs a well treatment fluid.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed to the blender.
  • 24. The system of claim 20, wherein the blender mixes the output of the first module, the second module and the third module.
  • 25. The system of claim 20, further comprising a fourth pump for pumping an output of the blender down hole.
  • 26. The system of claim 25, wherein the fourth pump is selected from the group consisting of a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump and a peristaltic pump.
  • 27. A method of providing or using a storage unit for a fracturing operation comprising: providing or using the storage unit at a job site for the fracturing operation, wherein the storage unit is supported on a structure configured such that the storage unit can be positioned at a height above a blender and is operable to direct a solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity,wherein the blender is used to prepare a fracturing fluid that comprises at least the solid material and a liquid,wherein at least one pump is present at the job site to pump the fracturing fluid down hole to perform the fracturing operation,wherein electricity in an amount sufficient to power the at least one pump to pump the fracturing fluid down hole is used to power the at least one pump, andwherein the amount of electricity is produced on-site using field gas.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the solid material is sand or proppant.
  • 29. The method of claim 27, wherein the structure comprises a plurality of legs.
  • 30. The method of claim 27, wherein the storage unit further comprises one or more load sensors.
  • 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the load sensors are coupled to an information handling system.
  • 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the information handling system is a network storage device.
  • 33. The method of claim 27, wherein the solid material is directed into the blender using gravity.
  • 34. The method of claim 27, further comprising: preparing the fracturing fluid comprising the solid material; andpumping the fracturing fluid into the down hole location to perform the fracturing operation.
  • 35. The method of claim 27, further comprising monitoring consumption of the solid material from the storage unit in real-time.
  • 36. The method of claim 27, further comprising determining a change in weight, mass and/or volume of the solid material in the storage unit.
  • 37. The method of claim 27, further comprising providing a real-time visual depiction of an amount of the solid material contained in the storage unit, and/or providing an alert when the amount of the solid material in the storage unit reaches a threshold level.
  • 38. The method of claim 27, further comprising using a pre-gel blender and pre-gel storage unit for hydrating materials used in the fracturing fluid.
  • 39. The method of claim 27, further comprising: transferring the solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity;using the blender to prepare the fracturing fluid comprising a liquid and the solid material;transferring the fracturing fluid to the at least one pump; andpumping the fracturing fluid into a down hole location to perform the fracturing operation using the at least one pump.
  • 40. The method of claim 27, wherein the blender is powered using electricity.
  • 41. The method of claim 27, wherein the conditioned field gas is compressed.
  • 42. The method of claim 27, wherein the storage unit is one of a plurality of storage units, and the plurality of storage units are supported on the structure configured such that the plurality of storage units can be positioned at a height above the blender and are operable to direct the solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity.
  • 43. A method of providing or using a storage unit for a fracturing operation comprising: providing or using a storage unit at a job site for the fracturing operation, wherein the storage unit is supported on a structure configured such that the storage unit can be positioned at a height above a blender and is operable to direct a solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity,wherein the blender is used to prepare a fracturing fluid that comprises at least the solid material and a liquid,wherein at least one pump is present at the job site to pump the fracturing fluid down hole to perform the fracturing operation, andwherein the at least one pump is powered using only electricity produced on-site using field gas.
  • 44. The method of claim 43, further comprising monitoring consumption of the solid material from the storage unit using an information handling system.
  • 45. The method of claim 43, further comprising determining a change in weight, mass and/or volume of the solid material in the storage unit.
  • 46. A method of providing or using a storage unit for a fracturing operation comprising: providing or using a storage unit at a job site for the fracturing operation, wherein the storage unit is supported on a structure configured such that the storage unit can be positioned at a height above a blender and is operable to direct a solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity,wherein the blender is used to prepare a fracturing fluid that comprises at least the solid material and a liquid,wherein at least one pump is present at the job site to pump the fracturing fluid down hole to perform the fracturing operation, andwherein the at least one pump is powered using only electricity produced using conditioned field gas.
  • 47. The method of claim 46, wherein the blender is powered using the electricity.
  • 48. The method of claim 46, further comprising monitoring consumption of the solid material from the storage unit using an information handling system.
  • 49. A method of using a storage unit for a fracturing operation comprising: using the storage unit at a job site for the fracturing operation to contain a solid material;preparing a fracturing fluid comprising at least a liquid and the solid material, wherein a blender is used to prepare the fracturing fluid; andusing at least one pump to pump the fracturing fluid into a down hole location to perform the fracturing operation,wherein the at least one pump is powered using only one or more generators using conditioned field gas.
  • 50. The method of claim 49, further comprising monitoring consumption of the solid material from the storage unit using an information handling system.
  • 51. The method of claim 49, further comprising determining a change in weight, mass and/or volume of the solid material in the storage unit.
  • 52. The method of claim 49, wherein the storage unit is supported on a structure configured such that the storage unit can be positioned at a height above the blender and is operable to direct the solid material from the storage unit to the blender using gravity.
  • 53. The method of claim 49, wherein preparing the fracturing fluid comprises: mixing water with a powder that comprises a dry polymer to form a mixture; andblending the mixture with at least the solid material using the blender, the blender being powered using electricity.
  • 54. A method of using a storage unit for a fracturing operation comprising: using the storage unit at a job site for the fracturing operation to contain a solid material;preparing a fracturing fluid comprising at least a liquid and the solid material, wherein a blender is used to prepare the fracturing fluid; andpumping the fracturing fluid into a down hole location to perform the fracturing operation, wherein the pumping is powered using only electricity produced using conditioned field gas.
  • 55. The method of claim 54, wherein the pumping comprises using a plurality of pumps.
  • 56. The method of claim 54, wherein the storage unit further comprises one or more load sensors coupled to an information handling system.
  • 57. The method of claim 56, further comprising providing a real-time visual depiction of an amount of the solid material contained in the storage unit, and/or providing an alert when the amount of the solid material in the storage unit reaches a threshold level.
  • 58. The method of claim 54, wherein preparing the fracturing fluid comprises: mixing water with a powder that comprises a dry polymer to form a mixture; andblending the mixture with at least the solid material using the blender, the blender being powered using electricity.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012. The reissue applications are U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,070, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,124, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076 now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695; the present U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/221,317, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,070 and the following co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 17/221,152, 17/221,176, 17/221,186, 17/221,242, 17/221,221, 17/221,204, 17/221,281, 17/221,267, 17/352,956, and 17/353,091, each of which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 16/537,070 and 16/537,124 and a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,843,012. This application is a continuation reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,040 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,124, both filed on Aug. 9, 2019, which are continuation reissue applications of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, filed on Dec. 22, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695, which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012 and a divisional reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, filed on Mar. 23, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725, which is a reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/744,959, filed on May 6, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012, issued on Sep. 16, 2014, entitled “Electric or Natural Gas Fired Small Footprint Fracturing Fluid Blending and Pumping Equipment,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,730, filed Sep. 11, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,444,312, issued on May 21, 2013, entitled “Improved Methods and Systems for Integral Blending and Storage of Materials,” the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (163)
Number Name Date Kind
548793 Winship Oct 1895 A
1730173 Stearns Oct 1929 A
2026600 Wilkinson Jan 1936 A
2795403 Mead Jun 1957 A
2821854 Franke Feb 1958 A
3155248 Haller Nov 1964 A
3259190 Parsons Jul 1966 A
3279550 Kersten Oct 1966 A
3291234 Woodburn Dec 1966 A
3378074 Kiel Apr 1968 A
3381943 Miller May 1968 A
3547291 Batterton et al. Dec 1970 A
3587760 Othmar et al. Jun 1971 A
3591147 Anderson et al. Jul 1971 A
3687319 Adam et al. Aug 1972 A
3722595 Kiel Mar 1973 A
3792790 Brubaker Feb 1974 A
3854540 Holmstrom, Jr. Dec 1974 A
3857452 Hartman Dec 1974 A
3893655 Sandiford Jul 1975 A
3931999 McCain Jan 1976 A
3934739 Zumsteg et al. Jan 1976 A
3962877 Schiemichen Jun 1976 A
4063605 Graham Dec 1977 A
4103752 Schmidt Aug 1978 A
4159180 Cooper et al. Jun 1979 A
4163626 Batterton et al. Aug 1979 A
4169506 Berry Oct 1979 A
4187047 Squifflet Feb 1980 A
4249838 Harvey et al. Feb 1981 A
4265266 Kierbow et al. May 1981 A
4345628 Campbell et al. Aug 1982 A
4345872 Arnold Aug 1982 A
4411327 Lockery et al. Oct 1983 A
4465420 Dillman Aug 1984 A
4576005 Force Mar 1986 A
4583170 Carlin et al. Apr 1986 A
4621972 Grotte Nov 1986 A
4634335 Van Den Pol Jan 1987 A
4708569 Nijenhuis Nov 1987 A
4716932 Adams, Jr. Jan 1988 A
4726435 Kitagawa et al. Feb 1988 A
4730118 Quarles et al. Mar 1988 A
4775275 Perry Oct 1988 A
4819750 Carnevale Apr 1989 A
4844189 Shisgal et al. Jul 1989 A
4850702 Arribau et al. Jul 1989 A
4850750 Cogbill et al. Jul 1989 A
4854714 Davis Aug 1989 A
4898473 Stegemoeller et al. Feb 1990 A
4913198 Hayahara et al. Apr 1990 A
4916631 Crain et al. Apr 1990 A
5016666 McKinney et al. May 1991 A
5044861 Kirchhoff et al. Sep 1991 A
5127450 Saatkamp Jul 1992 A
5133212 Grills et al. Jul 1992 A
5161628 Wirth Nov 1992 A
5205370 Paul et al. Apr 1993 A
5272920 Stephenson et al. Dec 1993 A
5318382 Cahill Jun 1994 A
5333695 Walter Aug 1994 A
5343000 Griffen et al. Aug 1994 A
5382411 Allen Jan 1995 A
5426137 Allen Jun 1995 A
5452615 Hilton Sep 1995 A
5452954 Handke et al. Sep 1995 A
5546683 Clark Aug 1996 A
5578798 Nuyts Nov 1996 A
5606853 Birch et al. Mar 1997 A
5635680 Dojan Jun 1997 A
5637837 Merz et al. Jun 1997 A
5665910 Knutson et al. Sep 1997 A
5717167 Filing et al. Feb 1998 A
5752768 Assh May 1998 A
5764522 Shalev Jun 1998 A
5769058 Scogin Jun 1998 A
5811737 Gaiski Sep 1998 A
5811738 Boyovich et al. Sep 1998 A
5833364 Rushing et al. Nov 1998 A
5850757 Wierenga Dec 1998 A
5880410 Neuman Mar 1999 A
5884232 Buder Mar 1999 A
5981446 Qiu et al. Nov 1999 A
6007227 Carlson Dec 1999 A
6118083 Boyovich et al. Sep 2000 A
6148667 Johnson Nov 2000 A
6186657 Fuchsbichler Feb 2001 B1
6242701 Breed et al. Jun 2001 B1
6284987 Al-Modiny Sep 2001 B1
6313414 Campbell Nov 2001 B1
6384349 Voll May 2002 B1
6414455 Watson Jul 2002 B1
6474926 Weiss Nov 2002 B2
6495774 Pederson Dec 2002 B1
6532830 Jansen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6601763 Hoch et al. Aug 2003 B1
6769315 Stevenson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6817376 Morgan et al. Nov 2004 B2
6928886 Meusel et al. Aug 2005 B2
6948535 Stegemoeller Sep 2005 B2
7048432 Phillippi et al. May 2006 B2
7114322 Yamanaka et al. Oct 2006 B2
7202425 Knudsen et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214028 Boasso May 2007 B2
7214892 Williamson May 2007 B2
7240549 Kimbara et al. Jul 2007 B2
7267001 Stein Sep 2007 B1
7353875 Stephenson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7472542 Yamanaka et al. Jan 2009 B2
7528329 Nuyts May 2009 B2
7789142 Dotson Sep 2010 B2
7836949 Dykstra Nov 2010 B2
7841394 McNeel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7946340 Surjaatmadja et al. May 2011 B2
8146665 Neal Apr 2012 B2
8444312 Hagan et al. May 2013 B2
20010038018 Bell et al. Nov 2001 A1
20030047387 Bogat Mar 2003 A1
20030047603 Lustenberger et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030054963 Chowdhary et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030117890 Dearing et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030202869 Posch Oct 2003 A1
20040008571 Coody et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011523 Sarada Jan 2004 A1
20050067336 Graham, Sr. Mar 2005 A1
20050110648 Lehrman et al. May 2005 A1
20050155667 Stegemoeller Jul 2005 A1
20060015414 Congram et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060028914 Phillippi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060107998 Kholy et al. May 2006 A1
20060225924 Ivan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070107540 Davies May 2007 A1
20070120367 Scherzer May 2007 A1
20070125543 McNeel et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070125544 Robinson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070201305 Heilman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070277982 Shampine et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080017369 Sarada Jan 2008 A1
20080029267 Shampine et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080066911 Luharuka et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080087428 Symington et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080135238 Cugnet et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080165613 Dykstra Jul 2008 A1
20080173480 Annaiyappa et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080203734 Grimes et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080238101 Ziegenfuss Oct 2008 A1
20080264625 Ochoa Oct 2008 A1
20080264641 Slabaugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271927 Crain Nov 2008 A1
20090068031 Gambier et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090078410 Krenek et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090504 Weightman Apr 2009 A1
20090095482 Surjaatmadja Apr 2009 A1
20090107734 Lucas Apr 2009 A1
20090178387 Schultz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090301725 Case et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018710 Leshchyshyn et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100038907 Hunt Feb 2010 A1
20100071284 Hagan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071899 Coquilleau Mar 2010 A1
20100314106 Tubel Dec 2010 A1
20110197988 Van Vliet et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120157356 Dawson et al. Jun 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
2522428 Sep 2008 CA
1877079 Dec 2006 CN
37 17 417 Dec 1988 DE
295 18 215 May 1996 DE
0605113 Jul 1994 EP
A 0 605 113 Jul 1994 EP
1655456 May 2006 EP
1900973 Jun 2010 EP
2474335 Jul 1981 FR
2474335 Jul 1981 FR
976279 Nov 1964 GB
1994019263 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9419263 Sep 1994 WO
WO 2007113528 Oct 2007 WO
2009065858 May 2009 WO
WO 2009065858 May 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (75)
Entry
U.S. Pat. No. 548,793, issued Oct. 29, 1895 to James H. Winship for “Rendering Apparatus”.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, dated Aug. 19, 2009.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, dated Jan. 28, 2010.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated Mar. 18, 2009.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated Jul. 7, 2009.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated Jan. 28, 2010.
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated Mar. 31, 2010.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,270, dated Mar. 4, 2011.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,551, dated Jun. 15, 2011.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,009, dated Jul. 23, 2012.
Fenna et al., “Dictionary of Weights, Measures, and Units,” Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. I, 65 and 66, dated 2002.
Kutz et al., “Mechanical Engineers' Handbook,” 2nd Ed., 1998, pp. I, II, and 1332, dated 1998.
Abulnaga, “Slurry Systems Handbook,” 2002, Pages I, II, and 1.20, dated 2002.
International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/001717 mailed May 10, 2011.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,297 mailed Apr. 21, 2011.
International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/000512 mailed Jun. 25, 2010.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,450 mailed Jun. 18, 2010.
“Truck-Back Turbines”, Machine Design, vol. 32, No. 5, Mar. 3, 1960, p. 12, 3 pages.
Tomlinson, H. L., A. C. Byrd, and C. F. VanBerg. “Fracturing process control and automation.” Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1988.
Stephenson, S. V., et al. “Fracturing process control and automation: Phase 2.” Petroleum Computer Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1993.
Purvis, D. L., R. J. Novotny, and B. T. Carlson. “Field-Applied Computerized Tracking System: A Practical Approach to On-Site Quality Control.” SPE Computer Applications 3.05 (1991): 22-28.
Invalidity Chart, Mud Pump and Associated Materials HHUS Sold to Nabors, U.S. Well Services, LLC v. TOPS Well Services, LLC et al., Case 3:19-cv-00237, D.I. 76-13 (S.D. Tex.), Apr. 29, 2020, 135 pages.
“The Jet Frac Revolution,” Turbine Stimulation Technologies, BIC Magazine, Apr. 2006, 3 pages.
Archive of MTT Website, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20090615185330/marineturbine.com/frac.asp, Jun. 15, 2009, 3 pages.
Excerpts from manual related to Halliburton Stim Star vessel, 7 pages.
1966 Halliburton Sales and Service Catalog, 3 pages.
“Hydraulic Fracturing and Flowback Hazards Other than Respirable Silica.” Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 3763-12 2014, 2014, 27 pages.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Hazard alert: Worker exposure to silica during hydraulic fracturing.” Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/dts/hazardalerts/hydraulic_frac_hazard_alert.html (2012), 7 pages.
“Auxiliary Pump Plants,” Halliburton Special Services, dated May 24, 2000.
“2,400 Hydraulic Horsepower Electric Pump Plant With All Support Equipment,” Halliburton Special Services, dated May 24, 2000.
“Electric Pumping Equipment SCR Drive,” Pumping Equipment Data Book Manual No. 277.17165, Halliburton Services, Section 17, pp. 187-194, dated Sep. 1980.
Declaration of Harold E. McGowen III, PE, Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.132, dated Jan. 24, 2022, 16 pages.
Railroad Commission of Texas, Injection / Disposal Well: Permitting, Testing, and Monitoring Manual, Summary of Standards and Procedures, Technical Review at Section 6 (“Injection Pressure Requirements”), available at https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-and-gas/publications-and-notices/manuals/injection-disposal-well-manual/summary-of-standards-and-procedures/technical-review/, accessed Jan. 24, 2022, 15 pages.
Takacs, Gabor. Chapter 1—Electrical Submersible Pumps Manual: Design, Operations, and Maintenance. Gulf Professional Publishing, Mar. 2009, 8 pages.
Declaration of Harold E. McGowen III, PE, Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.132, dated Apr. 18, 2022, 17 pages.
API TR 11L, A. P. I. “Design Calculations for Sucker Rod Pumping Systems (Conventional Units).” (Jun. 2008), Abstract only, 3 pages.
M.L. Van Domelen, E.L. Jantz, and K.S. Murphy, Halliburton Services Onsite Design, Analysis, and Automation Maximizes Efficiency of Fracturing Operations, SPE 18863, 10 pages.
Turner P. Northern, “Automatic Lease Operations,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 6, No. 01, pp. 21-24, 1954, doi: 10.2118/283-g.
Eugene C. Campbell, “Isolated Waterflood,” PE Production Automation Symposium, 1964, vol. All Days, SPE-856-MS, doi: 10.2118/856-ms.
R.A. Hinchliffe, “The Solid State Pipeline Gauger,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 5, No. 04, pp. 171-174, 1966, doi: 10.2118/66-04-03.
Millard E. Owens & Bret R. Allard, “Installation and Operation Of Hydraulic Pumping Systems On Cook Inlet,” Offshore Technology Conference, 1970, vol. All Days, OTC-1194-MS, doi: 10.4043/1194-ms.
M.P. Cleary, A.M. Burharali, A.R. Crockett, & I.A. Salehi, “Computerized Field System for Real-Time Monitoring and Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Operations,” in International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, 1986, vol. All Days, SPE-14087-MS, doi: 10.2118/14087-ms.
H.L. Tomlinson, A.C. Byrd, & C.F. VanBerg, Jr., “Fracturing process control and automation,” in Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, 1988.
S.O. Norris & K.S. Capps, “Reservoir Simulation with Simultaneous Graphic Display on the Macintosh II PC,” SPE Computer Applications, vol. 2, No. 06, pp. 24-27, 1990, doi: 10.2118/20362-pa.
S.V. Stephenson, E.L. Woodall, C.D Donaghe, & R.E Dant, “Fracturing process control and automation: Phase 2,” Petroleum Computer Conference, 1993.
Stephen Rassenfoss, “The Keywords for Blowout Preventers Are Trust But Verify,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 64, No. 08, pp. 40-48, 2012, doi: 10.2118/0812-0040-JPT.
Document 143—Redacted Defendants U.S. Well Services, LLC's and Profrac Holding Corp.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Dec. 18, 2023, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 28 pages.
Document 160—Redacted Plaintiffs Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.'s, Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc.'s, and Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief in Response, Jan. 11, 2024, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 29 pages.
Document 169—Plaintiffs Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.'s, Halliburton Group Technologies, Inc.'s, and Halliburton US Technologies, Inc.'s Claim Construction Sur-Reply Brief, Feb. 8, 2024, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 19 pages.
Exhibit D to Document 143—Declaration of Dr. Gary R. Wooley, Dec. 18, 2023, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 42 pages.
Cooper, Bob et al., “Jet Frac Porta-Skid—A New Concept in Oil Field Service Pump Equipment”, 1969, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE-2706, 10 pages.
Porter, John A., “Gas Turbines—Application and Experience”, 1968, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., Denver, CO, Power Sources, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE-1889, 6 pages.
Document 202—Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Final Invalidity Contentions, Mar. 25, 2024, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA, 8 pages.
Transcript of Oral Videotaped Deposition Ron Hyden, Feb. 15, 2024 (redacted), Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 83 pages.
Transcript of Video-Recorded Deposition of Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., et al., through Leonard Case, Feb. 13, 2024 (redacted), Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA, 128 pages.
Document 217—Memorandum in Support of Second Claim Construction Order, Case 6:22-CV-905-ADA-DTG, Apr. 9, 2024, 23 pages.
Document 219—Second Claim Construction Order, Case 6:22-CV-00905-ADA-DTG, Apr. 10, 2024, 1 page.
Document 131—Defendants U.S. Well Services, LLC's and Profrac Holding Corp.'s Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Nov. 17, 2023, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 69 pages.
Document 136—Defendants U.S. Well Services, LLC's and Profrac Holding Corp.'s Fourth Amended Answer and Counterclaim, Nov. 30, 2023, Case 6:22-cv-00905-ADA-DTG, 103 pages.
Document 381—USWS'S Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 251, Jul. 7, 2023, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, 27 pages.
Document 394—Halliburton's Brief in Opposition to USWS'S Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Jul. 21, 2023, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, 26 pages.
Document 402—USWS'S Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 251, Jul. 25, 2023, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, 16 pages.
Excerpts of Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings before the Honorable Alan D. Albright, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, Halliburton Energy Services vs. U.S. Well Services, Inc., Aug. 23, 2023, 16 pages.
Excerpts of Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings before the Honorable Alan D. Albright, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, Halliburton Energy Services vs. U.S. Well Services, Inc., Aug. 24, 2023, 40 pages.
Text Order Denying [381] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Aug. 16, 2023, entered by Judge Alan D. Albright, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, 2 pages.
Verdict Form, Case 6:21-cv-00367-ADA, Halliburton Energy Services vs. U.S. Well Services, Inc., Filed Aug. 24, 2023, 6 pages.
Boerger pump—available at: http://www.boerger-pumps.com/contero/gallery/Prospekte_USA/us_p_ssr_boerger_powerfeed_0309.pdf.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/GB2011/000678 mailed on Oct. 12, 2012.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,450, Jun. 18, 2010.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated May 27, 2010.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB2010/000512, Jun. 25, 2010.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/GB2009/001675 issued Feb. 1, 2011.
Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2, 731, 840 on Jul. 25, 2012.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,270, Mar. 4, 2011.
International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/001717, May 10, 2011.
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15079027 Mar 2016 US
Child 12774959 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16537070 Aug 2019 US
Child 17221317 US
Parent 16537124 Aug 2019 US
Child 17221317 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12557730 Sep 2009 US
Child 12774959 US
Reissues (9)
Number Date Country
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 16537070 US
Parent 15853076 Dec 2017 US
Child 16537070 US
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 15079027 US
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 16537124 US
Parent 15853076 Dec 2017 US
Child 16537124 US
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 12774959 US
Parent 15079027 Mar 2016 US
Child 12774959 US
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 12774959 US
Parent 12774959 May 2010 US
Child 17221317 US