The present invention relates to compounds, compositions and method for controlling insects.
Animals have chemosensory and mechanosensory systems that recognize a large array of environmental stimuli, generating behavioral responses. Many behavioral studies have been conducted to understand the genetics of these systems. The olfactory system plays a crucial role in the survival and maintenance of species, particularly in insects.
Biogenic amines serve a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator role in the olfactory system. The biogenic amine, octopamine, has a prominent role in insects and other invertebrates as it is involved in the regulation of multiple physiological events, for example, effects on muscular systems, sensory organs, endocrine tissues as well as learning and behavior. Octopamine (OA) occurs in large amounts in the nervous systems of species representing the phylum Arthropoda, including the classes Insecta and Crustacea. OA has a broad spectrum of biological roles in insects acting as a neurotransmitter, neurohormone and neuromodulator. OA exerts its effects through interaction with at least four classes of membrane bound receptors that belong to the family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). All members of GPCRs share the common motif of seven transmembrane (TM) domains.
When a GPCR is activated, depending on its type and the protein to which it binds, changes in intracellular concentrations of cAMP, Ca2+ or both often take place. Since changes in intracellular levels of cAMP or Ca2+ are the most commonly found cellular responses to biogenic amine treatments (e.g., serotonin, dopamine, octopamine, etc.), they are used to functionally classify receptor subtypes. As a result of GPCR activation, intracellular cAMP levels can either be elevated or reduced. The cellular response strictly relies on the specificity of interaction between the receptor and the G protein (See e.g., Gudermann T, Kalkbrenner F, Schultz G. 1996, “Diversity and selectivity of receptor-G protein interaction,” Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 36: 429-459; and Gudermann T, Schoneberg T, Schultz G. 1997, “Functional and structural complexity of signal transduction via G-protein-coupled receptors,” Annu Rev Neurosci 20: 399-427, both of which are incorporated herein by this reference). When the receptor binds to Gs-type protein, the activated Gas subunit will interact with adenylyl cyclase (AC) in the plasma membrane. This leads to an increase of AC activity and production of cAMP from ATP.
Several biogenic amine receptors are also known to inhibit AC activity. This effect is mediated by interaction of the receptor with inhibitory G protein (Gi). Interaction of AC with activated Gαi subunits most likely competes with binding of activated Gas subunits and thereby interferes with AC activation.
Another pathway that is activated by several biogenic amine receptors results in a rise of intracellular Ca2+ levels. In such a scenario the amine-activated receptor binds to G proteins of the Gq/o family (See e.g., supra, Gudermann et al., 1996 and Gudermann et al., 1997). The activated Gαq/o subunits bind to and stimulate phospholipase C (PLC) activity. The enzyme hydrolyzes a membrane-bound substrate, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate which gives rise to two second messengers IP3 and DAG. After binding of IP3 to its receptors, the calcium channel pore is opened and Ca2+ is released into the cytoplasm. Ca2+ ions play a vital role in the regulation of many cellular functions by binding to members of large family of Ca2+-binding proteins and/or directly controlling enzymatic or ion channel activities.
Multiple insect species have been utilized to understand the biological functions and pharmacological characteristics of octopamine receptors. Studies with Periplaneta americana (American cockroach) have provided insight into the pharmacology and second messenger signaling of octopamine through octopamine receptors. For example, octopamine has been found to activate adenylate cyclase in certain cells in this species. Furthermore, octopamine has been found to increase inositol triphosphates in certain cells in this species.
As the octopaminergic system is believed to be unique to invertebrate physiology, this pathway has been proposed to offer a target for invertebrate pesticides with potential for low vertebrate toxicity. Formamidine-like chemicals have been found to be octopaminergic agonists and inhibit the uptake of sodium-sensitive octopamine in certain insects; for example, the formamidine pesticides chlordimeform and demethylchloridimeform were found to target the octopamine signaling pathway in certain invertebrates, including Periplaneta americana. To provide insight into the design of octopamine agonists that could be used as potential insecticides, structure function analyses have been performed with 2-(arylimino)oxazolidines and 2-(substituted benzylamino)-2-oxazolines in regard to activation of the octopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase in certain cells in Periplaneta Americana. More recently, it has been suggested that one site of action for the insecticidal activity of plant essential oils against Periplaneta americana is the octopaminergic system and that octopamine receptors may be targeted by these compounds, as described in Enan, E., 2001, “Insecticidal activity of essential oils: octopaminergic sites of action,” Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 130, 325-327, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Identifying plant essential oils and combinations thereof, having insect-controlling activity is particularly desirable given that many such compounds do not produce unwanted or harmful affects on humans, other animal species, and certain plants. However, identifying the most effective plant essential oils and combinations thereof requires random selection and use of tedious screening methods, which, given the vast number of plant essential oils and possible combinations thereof, is a substantially impossible task.
As such, there is a need in the art for an improved method for screening compounds and compositions for insect control activity.
The present invention addresses the above identified problems, and others, by providing a screening method for identifying compounds and compositions that are effective insect control agents; a screening method for identifying compounds and compositions that are effective species-specific insect control agents; compounds and compositions isolated from the screening methods; cell lines expressing an octopamine receptor; and isolated nucleic acid molecule sequences.
The present invention includes: a screening method for identifying compounds and compositions that are effective insect control agents; a screening method for identifying compounds and compositions that are effective species-specific insect control agents; compounds and compositions isolated from the screening methods; transfected cell lines; and isolated nucleic acid molecule sequences.
The present invention includes: an isolated nucleic acid molecule sequence which encodes a protein that binds a biogenic amine, resulting in changes in intracellular concentrations of cAMP, Ca2+, or both, having a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a fragment or derivative thereof and/or having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or a fragment or derivative thereof; an isolated nucleic acid molecule of having at least about 30% similarity to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule encodes a protein, resulting in changes in intracellular concentrations of cAMP, Ca2+, or both; an isolated nucleic acid molecule of having at least about 30% similarity to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, wherein the molecule encodes an octopamine receptor or a protein having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or a fragment or derivative thereof; and an isolated nucleic acid molecule having a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or a fragment or derivative thereof, wherein the molecule encodes a protein designated Pa oa1. SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 are shown in alignment in
The present invention also includes: a strain of cells including a DNA vector having a nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1; a strain of cells expressing an octopamine receptor cloned from an insect species of interest; a strain of cells expressing an octopamine receptor cloned from Periplaneta Americana (Pa oa1); a strain of cells expressing a protein having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or fragments or derivatives thereof, wherein the fragments or derivatives thereof bind octopamine; a strain of cells expressing an octopamine receptor cloned from Drosophila melanogaster (QAMB); a strain of cells expressing a protein having an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, or fragments or derivatives thereof, wherein the fragments or derivatives thereof bind octopamine. The transfected cells may be mammalian cells or insect cells; for example, they may be African green monkey kidney COS-7 cells (COS-7 cells) or human embryonic kidney-293 cells (HEK-293 cells).
The present invention also includes a screening method of using a cell line expressing an octopamine receptor to identify compounds and compositions that are effective insect control agents. For example, the octopamine receptor expressed by the cell line may be Pa oa1; or have an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, or fragments or derivatives thereof, wherein the fragments or derivatives thereof bind octopamine.
The present invention also includes a method of using multiple cell lines, wherein the cell lines are transfected with octopamine receptors from different insect species of interest, to identify compounds and compositions that are effective species-specific insect control agents. For example, a cell line expressing Pa oa1 and a cell line expressing OAMB could be used to screen compounds and compositions having insect control activity which is specific to Periplaneta Americana or to Drosophila melanogaster.
The present invention also includes compounds and compositions having the ability to control target insects, which compounds and/or compositions are identified using the screening methods of the present invention. These compounds and/or compositions may include compounds that are general regarded as safe (GRAS compounds) meaning that they do not produce unwanted or harmful affects on humans and other non-target animal species and that they are exempt from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pesticide registration requirements. The compounds and/or compositions of the present invention include certain plant essential oils identified using the screening methods of the present invention.
The compounds and compositions of the present invention control insects by targeting an octopamine receptor, resulting in a disruptive change in the intracellular levels of cAMP, Ca2+ or both. For purposes of simplicity, the term insect has been and shall be used through out this application; however, it should be understood that the term insect refers, not only to insects, but also to arachnids, larvae, and like invertebrates. Also for purposes of this application, the term “insect control” shall refer to repelling or killing an insect.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following specific but non-limiting examples.
G protein-coupled receptors from insects and a tick that are demonstrated to be octopamine receptors or have significant DNA similarity to known octopamine receptors are aligned using the program DNAStar (Ma). The following degenerate oligonucleotides are designed based on this alignment: Transmembrane (TM) VI oligonucleotide 5′TACAAGCTTTG(C, T)TGG(C, T)(G, T)(A, C, G, T)CC(A, C, G, T)TTCTT3′ (SEQ ID NO: 4), and TM VII oligonucleotide 5′CATGCGGCCGCTTT(A, C, G, T)(A, C)(A, C)(A, G)TA(A, C, G T)CC(A, C)AGCCA3′ (SEQ ID NO: 5). The underlined sequence corresponds to the TM regions.
The TM VI oligonucleotide contains a HindIII site and the TM VII oligonucleotide contains a NotI site flanking the TM sequences Total RNA from the heads of mixed sex adult American cockroaches that have the antennae excised is prepared by ultracentrifugation through cesium chloride, as described in Chirgwin et al., 18 Biochemistry 5294-5299 (1979), and is reverse transcribed into cDNA using random hexamers and murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is performed on this cDNA using AmpliTaq polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and the TM VI and VII oligonucleotides at final concentrations of about 5 μM The reaction conditions are about 95° C., about 5 min for about one cycle; about 95° C., about 45 s, about 40° C., about 2 min, about 72° C., about 30 s for about three cycles; about 95° C., about 45 s, about 55° C., about 2 min; about 72° C., about 30 s for about 37 cycles; and about 72° C., about 10 min for about one cycle.
Products are digested with HindIII and NotI and ligated into pBK-RSV (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). Inserts are sequenced and compared to known genes by searching the NCBI database with the Blast program.
To obtain the corresponding cDNA for an approximately 101 nucleotide fragment with the highest similarity to octopamine receptors from other species, 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) are performed using the SMART RACE cDNA amplification system (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.). Poly(A) RNA is prepared from total RNA isolated from the head of Periplaneta americana using an oligo-dT column as per the manufacturer's protocol (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.). The poly(A) RNA is used as template in the RACE reverse transcription reaction for production of 5′ and 3′ RACE cDNA as per the manufacturer's instructions The gene specific oligonucleotides used for the RACE PCR are 5′ RACE oligonucleotide 5′CAGTAGCCCAGCCAGAAGAGGACGGAGAAG3′ (SEQ ID NO: 6), and 3′ RACE oligonucleotide 5′GCTGGCTGCCGTTCTTCACCATGTACCTGG3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7). 5′ RACE and 3′ RACE polymerase chain reactions are each about 50 μl and consist of about 2.5 μl of the respective cDNA reaction, about 0.2 μM of the gene specific oligonucleotide and the additional RACE components including Advantage 2 polymerase as per the manufacturer (Clontech). The cycling conditions for the 5′ RACE are about 95° C., about 1 min for about one cycle; about 94° C., about 20 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about five cycles; about 94° C., about 20 s, about 70° C., about 10 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about five cycles; about 94° C., about 20 s, about 68° C., about 10 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about 32 cycles; and about 72° C., about 10 min for about one cycle.
An approximately 1.9 kb product is gel purified and further, amplified using the same oligonucleotides, Advantage 2 polymerase and cycling parameters of about 95° C., about 3 min for about one cycle; about 94° C., about 20 s, about 68° C., about 10 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about 35 cycles; and about 72° C., about 10 min for about one cycle. To facilitate T/A ligation, the product is A-tailed by precipitating with ethanol, resuspending in 1×PCR Buffer II (Applied Biosystems), 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dATP and 0.05 U AmpliTaq per μl and incubating at about 72° C. for about 15 min The PCR product is ligated into pBK-RSV (Stratagene) that has been digested with SmaI and T-tailed using dTTP and AmpliTaq. The insert is sequenced on both strands by automated fluorescent DNA sequencing (Vanderbilt Cancer Center).
The cycling conditions for the 3′ RACE reaction are about 95° C., about 1 min for about one cycle; about 94° C., about 5 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about five cycles; about 94° C., about 5 s, about 70° C., about 10 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about five cycles; about 94° C., about 5 s, about 68° C., about 10 s, about 72° C., about 3 min for about 32 cycles; and about 72° C., about 10 min for about one cycle. The product of this reaction is A-tailed, subcloned and sequenced as for the 5′ RACE product.
Oligonucleotides used to amplify the open reading frame are a sense oligonucleotide 5′ CAGGAATTCATGAGGGACGGGGTTATGAACGCTAG 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 8), and an antisense oligonucleotide 5′ GCTTCTAGATCACCTGGAGTCCGATCCATCGTTG 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9). Sequences corresponding to the open reading frame are underlined. The sense oligonucleotide contains an EcoRI restriction site and the antisense oligonucleotide an Xbal restriction site. These oligonucleotides are used in a polymerase chain reaction that included the 5′RACE cDNA as template and VENT polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.).
The product is subcloned into the plasmid pAc5.1/V5-His (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) at the EcoRI and XbaI restriction sites and sequenced. This plasmid is designated pAc-Pa oa1. For mammalian cell expression, a Kozak sequence is inserted using a sense oligonucleotide 5′ACAGAATTCGCCACCATGAGGGACGGGGTTATGAACGCTAG 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 10) and an internal antisense oligonucleotide that contains an XhoI site 5′ TTGACGGCGCTCGAGGACGTC 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11). The sense oligonucleotide contains an EcoRI site These oligonucleotides are used in a polymerase chain reaction that includes pAc-Pa oa1 as template and VENT polymerase. The product is inserted at EcoRI and Xhol sites into pAc-Pa oa1, in which the corresponding EcoRI and Xhol fragment have been removed The product is sequenced. The entire open reading frame is then transferred into pCDNA3 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) at EcoRI and Apal restriction sites, and this plasmid is designated pCDNA3-Pa oa1.
The Drosophila melanogaster head cDNA phage library GH is obtained through the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (world wide web <dot> fruitfly <dot> org). Phage DNA is purified from this library using a liquid culture lysate as described in Lech, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1 (2001). Oligonucleotides designed to amplify the open reading frame of Drosophila melanogaster OAMB consist of the sense oligonucleotide 5′ CAGGAATTCGCCACCATGAATGAAACAGAGTGCGAGGATCTC 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 12) and the antisense oligonucleotide 5′ AATGCGGCCGCTCAGCTGAAGTCCACGCCCTCG 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 13). Sequences corresponding to the open reading frame are underlined. A Kozak sequence is included in the sense oligonucleotide. In addition, the 5′ oligonucleotide includes an EcoRI restriction site and the 3′ oligonucleotide a NotI site.
For amplification by the polymerase chain reaction, about 200 ng of the GH library DNA is used as template with about 0.5 μM of each oligonucleotide and VENT DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Cycling conditions are about 95° C., about 5 min for about one cycle; about 95° C., about 30 s and about 70° C., about 1.5 min for about 40 cycles; and about 70° C., about 10 min for about one cycle. The product is digested with EcoRI and NotI, ligated into pCDNA3 and sequenced on both strands by automated fluorescent DNA sequencing (Vanderbilt Cancer Center).
A polymerase chain reaction with degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to regions of TM VI and TM VII of previously identified octopamine receptors is used to isolate an approximately 101 nucleotide fragment of cDNA from the head of Periplaneta americana This cDNA fragment is used to design gene specific oligonucleotides to amplify the full-length cDNA of the corresponding gene by RACE. This method generates overlapping 5′ and 3′ segments that include the original cDNA fragment from TM VI to TM VII indicating these segments originate from the same cDNA. The cDNA includes an approximately 1887 nucleotide open reading frame and 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (Genbank accession number is AY333178). The predicted initiation codon is preceded by an in-frame stop codon, indicating that the 5′ end of the open reading frame is included in the cDNA and that the encoded protein will be full length. This cDNA and encoded protein are designated Pa oa1.
The open reading frame encodes a protein of approximately 628 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of about 68,642 Da. Hydropathy analysis by the method described in Kyte et al., J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132 (1982), with a window of about nine amino acids indicates about seven potential transmembrane spanning domains. In addition, a protein BLAST search finds similarity of Pa oa1 to the rhodopsin family of 7 transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors contained within the conserved domain database.
The BLAST analysis also indicates Pa oa1, is most similar to other biogenic amine receptors. As mentioned above, all members of GPCRs share the common motif of seven transmembrane (TM) domains. Of these seven domains, TM 3, 5 and 6 comprise the binding sites. Compared to proteins with defined functions, Pa oa1 is most closely related to OAMB, an octopamine receptor from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and to Lym-oa1, an octopamine receptor from the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis). Sequence similarity is also detected with vertebrate α1A adrenergic receptors and invertebrate tyramine receptors. Protein alignment indicates Pa oa1 is about 51% identical to OAMB, 37% identical to Lym oa1, and about 27% identical to both the insect tyramine receptors Tyr-Loc from Locusta migratoria and Tyr-Dro from Drosophila melanogaster. Sequence conservation between Pa oa1, OAMB and Lym oa1, is greatest within the TM domains, as shown in
Cell culture reagents may be obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.), or as otherwise indicated. African green monkey kidney COS-7 cells and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells are obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). COS-7 cells are grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (about 4.5 g glucose/l) and about 10% fetal bovine serum. HEK-293 cells are grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (about 1 g glucose/1), about 5% fetal bovine serum and about 5% newborn calf serum Both types of media are supplemented with about 100 U penicillin G/ml, about 100 μg streptomycin/ml and about 0.25 μg amphotericin B/ml) except during Lipofectamine 2000 transfections.
Lipofectamine 2000 and Opti-MEM I media may be obtained from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, Calif.). COS-7 cells are transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000. Cells are plated at about 1.5×106 cells per dish (about 55 cm2) in about 10 ml growth medium without antibiotics the day before transfection. For each dish, about 30 μl Lipofectamine 2000 in about 1 ml Opti-MEM I medium is mixed with about 12 μg plasmid DNA in about 1 ml Opti-MEM I medium and added to the cells after an approximately 20 min incubation at room temperature. The cells are harvested for membrane preparation 24 h following transfection.
For stable transfections of HEK-293 cells, about 1×106 cells in about 2.5 ml growth media without antibiotics are plated into dishes (about 10 cm2) the day before transfection. For transfection, about 10 μl Lipofectamine 2000 is added to about 250 μl Opti-MEM I medium. This is mixed with about 4 μg plasmid DNA in about 250 μl OptiMEM I medium. After an approximately 20 min incubation at room temperature, the approximately 500 μl of solution is added to cells in a single dish. Cells are split about 24 h after transfection into growth media containing about 0.8 mg G418 sulfate/ml (Mediatech Inc., Heradon, VA). Clonal lines are selected and assayed for receptor expression with whole cell binding by incubating about 500,000 cells in about 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.4)) with about 2 nM 3H-yohimbine for about 30 min at about 27° C. Cells are pelleted by centrifugation, washed with PBS, and then transferred to scintillation vials Nonspecific binding is determined by including about 50 μM phentolamine in the binding reaction.
All steps are performed at about 4° C. or on ice. Cells are harvested in growth media by scraping from the dishes and then rinsing dishes with PBS. The cells are centrifuged at about 1000 g for about 3 min, washed with PBS and centrifuged again. The cells are suspended in ice cold hypotonic buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4)), incubated on ice for about 10 min, and lysed using a glass dounce homogenizer and tight glass pestle (Kontes Glass Co., Vineland, NJ) with about 10 strokes Nuclei are pelleted by centrifugation at about 600 g for about 5 min The supernatant is decanted and centrifuged at about 30,000 g for about 30 min to pellet a crude membrane fraction. The pellet is suspended, in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, 5 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.4)). Protein concentration is determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). Membranes are frozen on dry ice and stored at about −75° C. in aliquots.
Antagonists and biogenic amines are obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Octopamine is the mixed isomeric form DL-octopamine. 3H-yohimbine is obtained from Perkin Elmer Life Sciences (Boston, Mass.). Radioligand binding is performed with about 7.5-15 μg membrane protein in about 250 μl binding buffer for about 30 min at about 27° C. while shaking at about 100 rpm. Reactions are terminated by addition of about 3 ml ice cold binding buffer and filtered over GF/C filters (Whatman International, Maidstone, England) that have been soaked for about 30 min in about 0.3% polyethylenimine (Sigma-Aldrich). Filters are rinsed again with about 3 ml binding buffer For the determination of Kd and Bmax, a range of 3H-yohimbine is used from about 0.5 to 50 nM, and about 50 μM phentolamine is used as a competitor to determine nonspecific binding. To determine Ki, of different ligands, about 2 nM 3H-yohimbine is used with a concentration range of competitor that gives from 0% to 100% competition. Binding data is analyzed by nonlinear regression using the software GraphPad Prism (San Diego, Calif.).
For pharmacological binding experiments, Pa oa1, is expressed in COS-7 cells by transient transfection. Membrane fractions are analyzed to determine total, nonspecific and specific binding of 3H-yohimbine, as shown in
The octopamine receptor OAMB from Drosophila melanogaster is amplified by the polymerase chain reaction. Saturation binding analysis with 3H-yohimbine is performed with OAMB expressed in COS-7 cells, as shown in
Competitive binding with various biogenic amines is utilized to determine the affinities for potential natural ligands of Pa oa1. Referring now to Table A, below, DL-Octopamine has the lowest Ki (about 13.3 μM) for Pa oa1 followed by tyramine (about 31.0 μM). The decreasing order of affinity for the biogenic amines is octopamine>tyramine>dopamine>serotonin. The binding affinities for octopamine and tyramine are determined for this receptor. The Ki (mean±standard deviation) of octopamine and tyramine for OAMB are about 8.20±2.60M and about 33.8±7.93 μM, respectively. These values are similar to those obtained for Pa oa1. The affinity of octopamine is about 2.3-fold higher than tyramine for Pa oa1, and for OAMB, the affinity of octopamine is about 4.1-fold higher than tyramine, indicating that octopamine is the likely endogenous ligand for Pa oa1.
In addition to using the affinity of octopamine receptors for specific antagonists as a method for classifying these receptors, antagonists may be used to analyze the effects of octopamine on adenylate cyclase activity in the brain, ventral nerve cord and hemocytes of Periplaneta americana. A pharmacological profile is developed for Pa oa1 using these antagonists. With reference to Table A, in order of decreasing affinity, the profile of the antagonists is chlorpromazine>phentolamine>mianserin>metoclopramide.
The Pa oa1 cDNA of 2268 bp which includes an 1887 nucleotide open reading frame and 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions is set forth in
With reference to
With reference to
Twenty-four hours before cell treatment, about 300,000 HEK-293 cells are plated in about 1 ml media with about 0.8 mg G418/ml into multi-well dishes (e.g., 12-well, 4.5 cm2). For cell treatment, the media is aspirated and about 1 ml PBS with about 300 μM IBMX and the test reagent is added. Cells are incubated at about 37° C. for about 20 min, and the PBS is then aspirated. Cells are incubated with about 70% ethanol for about 1 h at about −20° C. The cellular debris is centrifuged and then the supernatant is removed and lyophilized to dryness. The amount of cAMP in the extract is determined by using a cAMP binding protein from the 3H-cAMP Biotrak assay system (Amersham Biosciences) as per the manufacturer's instructions. To test the effects of calcium chelation on cAMP levels, the cells are incubated with about 20 μl V 1 BAPTA/AM (Calbiochem Biochemicals, La Jolla, Calif.) for about 10 min before the addition of the test reagents.
Octopamine has been demonstrated to increase levels of the second messenger cAMP in brain, thoracic ganglion and hemocytes from Periplaneta americana. To determine which second messenger signaling pathways octopamine could affect through the Pa oa1 receptor, HEK-293 cells are stably transfected with pCDNA3-Pa oa1 or pCDNA3 without an insert as a control. In the control HEK-293 cells, neither DL-octopamine nor tyramine at concentrations up to about 100 μM has significant effects on cAMP levels.
A clone transfected with pCDNA3-Pa oa1 having a high specific binding to 3H-yohimbine is selected for second messenger analysis. Both octopamine and tyramine are able to increase the levels of cAMP in these cells in a dose dependent manner, as shown in
To determine cAMP levels in cells, about 24-hours before cell treatment, 300,000 HEK-293 cells are plated in 1 mL media with 0.8 mg G418/mL into multi-dishes (4.5 cm2). For cell treatment, the media is aspirated and 1 mL PBS with 300 μM IBMX and the test reagent is added. Cells are incubated at 37° C. for 20 min, and the PBS is then aspirated. Cells are incubated with 70% ethanol for 1 hour at −20° C. The cellular debris is centrifuged and then the supernatant is removed and lyophilized to dryness. The amount of cAMP in the extract is determined by using a cAMP binding protein from the 3H-cAMP Biotrak assay system (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
To determine Ca2+ levels in the cells, HEK-293 cells are washed once with Hank's balanced salt solution (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.3 mM Na2HPO4, 0.4 mM KH2PO4, 4.2 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, and 5.6 mM glucose (pH 7.4)) (HBSS). Cells are collected by scraping and are suspended at about 750,000 cells/ml in HBSS with about 5 μM Fura-2 AM (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells are incubated at about 37° C. for about 1 h in the dark, centrifuged, suspended in HBSS at about 750,000 cells/ml and used for calcium measurements A spectrofluoremeter with Felix software from Photon Technology International (Lawrenceville, NJ) is used for the fluorescence measurements and data collection Octopamine has been demonstrated to modulate intracellular calcium levels in cultured hemocytes of Malacosoma disstria. Also, in hemocytes from Periplaneta americana, octopamine lead to an increase in inositol triphosphate which likely will lead to increases in calcium in these cells as well The ability of both octopamine and tyramine to modulate calcium levels in the HEK-293 clone expressing Pa oa1 is determined Neither about 10 μM octopamine nor about 10 μM tyramine modulates intracellular calcium levels in control HEK-293 cells transfected with pCDNA3 lacking an insert However, when about 100 nM octopamine is added to the Pa oa1 expressing HEK-293 cells, a rapid increase in intracellular calcium is detected, as shown in
Testing of these amines at additional concentrations indicates that the lowest concentration of octopamine that increases intracellular calcium levels is about 10 nM Tyramine is found to increase intracellular calcium when a concentration of about 1 μM or higher is tested These increases in intracellular calcium by about 10 nM octopamine and about 1 μM tyramine are to a similar level, both of which is lower than the increase in calcium mediated by about 100 nM octopamine. This result is similar to that obtained with the cAMP assay in that an approximately 100-fold increase in tyramine concentration compared to about 10 nM octopamine is required to give a similar level of response.
As such, it appears that the Pa oa1 receptor is an octopamine receptor, the Pa oa1 receptor may be targeted to effect a disruptive change in intracellular levels of Ca2+, controlled targeting of the receptor allows for insect control, and the cell lines stably expressing the Pa oa1 receptor may be used to screen compounds and compositions for insect control activity.
Octopamine is found to increase both cAMP and calcium in HEK-293 cells expressing Pa oa1 and the calcium increase is detected immediately upon octopamine addition. As such, the possibility that calcium is leading to a secondary increase in cAMP levels in the cells expressing Pa oa1 is tested. The intracellular calcium chelator BAPTA/AM is used BAPTA/AM at about 20 μM is found to inhibit the increase in free intracellular calcium when about 1 μM octopamine is added to the Pa oa1-expressing cells. Octopamine-mediated changes in cAMP levels are compared in the absence and presence of about 20 μM BAPTA/AM. cAMP levels following treatment with either about 100 nM or about 1 μM octopamine, as well as basal cAMP levels, are not found to be statistically different, whether in the absence or presence of about 20 μM BAPTA/AM, as shown in
For radioligand binding studies, the binding of 3H-yohimbine to membranes isolated from COS-7 cells expressing Pa oa1 and octopamine receptor (OAMB) from Drosophila melanogaster Are performed. See Bischof and Enan, 2004, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, pp. 511-521, which is incorporated herein by this reference. The data shown in Table B demonstrates that the affinity of Pa oa1 to the radioligand is about 1.5 fold higher than OAMB. Radioligand binding using 3H-yohimbine is performed on membranes expressing either either Pa oa1 or OAMB. For the determination of Kd and Bmax, a range of 3H-yohimbine is used from 0.5 to 50 nM, and 50 μM phentolamine is used as a competitor to determine nonspecific binding. To determine Ki of octopamine, 4 nM 3H-yohimbine is used with a concentration range of octopamine that gives from 0 to 100% competition.
With reference to
In this example, membranes isolated from COS-7 cells expressing the receptor are used for receptor binding studies and HEK-293 cells are used for cAMP and [Ca2+] studies. Plant essential oils, including: p-cymene [methyl(1-methylethyl)benzene], eugenol [2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)phenol], trans-anethole [1-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)benzene], cinnamic alcohol [3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol], α-terpineol [p-menth-1-en-8-ol], methyl salicylate [2-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester], 2-phenylethyl propionate, and geraniol [3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol], are obtained from City Chemical (West Haven, Conn.) and tested for insect control activity. The chemical structures of these compounds are set forth in
The binding activity of 3H-yohimbine to membranes expressing Pa oa1 or OAMB is performed in the presence and absence of three structurally related plant essential oil monoterpenoids, which are selected based on their insecticidal activity, the absence or presence and location of the hydroxyl group and a spacing group within the molecule. Membrane protein (10 μg) expressing Pa oa1 is incubated with 4 nM 3H-yohimbine in the presence and absence of 50 μM of the test chemical. The specific activity is calculated as the difference between counts in the presence and absence of test chemical. Specific binding is calculated by determining nonspecific binding with 50 μM tested plant essential oils and subtracting nonspecific binding from total binding.
With reference to
Eugenol (50 μM) significantly decreases the cAMP level (24%) in cells expressing Pa oa1 but slightly decreased cAMP level in cells expressing OAMB. A 22% increase in cAMP level in cells expressing OAMB is found in response to treatment with (50 μM) trans-anethole. Cinnamic alcohol (50 μM) induces slight increase in cAMP level in both cell models.
To address whether changes in [Ca2+]i in octopamine receptor-expressing cells in response to 25 μM of tested plant essential oils is mediated specifically through the receptor, cells transfected with an empty plasmid (pCDNA3) are treated with either test chemicals or solvent only and changes in [Ca2+]i are monitored. In cells transfected with an empty plasmid, none of the test chemicals induce remarkable changes in [Ca2+]i levels as compared with cells treated with the solvent (data not shown).
On the other hand, changes in [Ca2+]i level in cells expressing either OAMB or Pa oa1 in response to test chemicals is remarkably high.
Generally, changes in [Ca2+]i in cells expressing OAMB is more pronounced than changes in cells expressing Pa oa1. Based on increased [Ca2+]i level in cells expressing OAMB, cinnamic alcohol is the most potent agent tested in this example, followed by eugenol and trans-anethole. In cells expressing Pa oa1, eugenol is the most potent agent tested in this example, followed by cinnamic alcohol then trans-anethole. The data suggest that elevation pattern of [Ca2+]i levels is chemical-dependent. While application of octopamine induces an immediate but transient peak (˜20 sec) in [Ca2+]i level, as shown in
In cells expressing OAMB, the increase in [Ca2+]i level in response to cinnamic alcohol is slower than the other two chemicals. In Pa oa1-expressing cells, the increase in [Ca2+]i in response to trans-anethole is slower than eugenol and cinnamic alcohol. Thus, the efficacy of coupling of both cloned octopamine receptors to different second messenger signaling varies with the chemical used.
The present example studies the molecular interaction of plant essential oils with octopamine receptors from different insect species. Based on the characteristic features of octopamine receptors from American cockroach and fruit fly, the example characterizes certain molecular basis for insect species differences in response to plant essential oils. Although trans-anethole does not have a significant effect on binding to OAMB while eugenol and cinnamic alcohol do (
On the other hand, while both eugenol and cinnamic alcohol decrease the binding activity to Pa oa1 (
Protein alignment indicate that the regions of lowest similarity among these two proteins are in the amino terminus extending into TM1, extracellular loop2 between TM4 and TM5, intracellular loop between TM5 and TM6 and the carboxy termini following TM7 (
Toxicity bioassay against the wild type Drosophila melanogaster fly and American cockroach is performed to address insect species specificity in response to certain plant essential oils and to determine whether the cellular changes in Pa oa1 and OAMB cell models in response to treatment with tested essential oils correlate with their insecticidal activity.
Drosophila melanogaster wild type strain is purchased from Carolina Biological Supply Company (Burlington, NC). Flies carrying the inactive (iav) mutation that exhibit low locomotor activity and poor mating success, both of which are associated with a deficiency in octopamine synthesis are obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (flybase ID FBa10005570, stock# BL-6029 iav).
Plant essential oils, including: p-cymene [methyl(1-methylethyl)benzene], eugenol [2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)phenol], trans-anethole [1-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)benzene], cinnamic alcohol [3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol], α-terpineol [p-menth-1-en-8-ol], methyl salicylate [2-hydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester], 2-phenylethyl propionate, and geraniol [3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol], are obtained from City Chemical (West Haven, Conn.) and tested for insect control activity. The chemical structures of these compounds are set forth in
Acetonic solutions of plant essential oils are prepared and different concentrations of each, that give from 10%-100% mortality, are applied by topical application. Controls are treated with the same volume (0.5 μl/insect) of acetone. Replicates, with 5 insects per replicate, are used for each concentration. The mortality is calculated 24 hours after treatment. Data are subjected to probit analysis to determine LD50 value for each compound. See Finney, 1971, Probit Analysis 3rd Ed., Cambridge University Press, London, pg. 333.
To determine whether the octopamine/octopamine receptor (OA/OAR) system is involved in the toxicity of tested plant essential oils, octopamine synthesis mutant (iav) Drosophila melanogaster strain is topically treated with a dose equivalent to the determined LD50 for wild type strain. For this study, the LD50 values of eight monoterpenoid plant essential oils (p-cymene, eugenol, trans-anethole, cinnamic alcohol, α-terpineol, methyl salicylate, phenylethyl propionate, and geraniol) are determined against wild type as described above and being used to treat the octopamine mutant (iav) fruit fly. Controls are treated with the same volume (0.5 μl/fly) of acetone. The mortality is calculated 24 hour after treatment. Multiple replicates and 5 flies per replicate are used for the bioassay of each chemical. Data are subjected to probit analysis to determine LD50 value for each chemical. See Finney, 1971.
To determine insect species differences in response to plant essential oil monoterpenoids, the toxicity of certain monoterpenoids is determined against fruit fly and American cockroach. Based on the calculated LD50 values, shown in Table C, cinnamic alcohol is the most toxic chemical tested in the example (LD50=1.65 μg/fly) against wild type fruit fly strain, followed by eugenol (LD50=1.90 μg/fly), and trans-anethole (LD50=6.00 μg/fly). Eugenol is about 2-fold and about 27-fold more toxic against American cockroach than cinnamic alcohol and trans-anethole, respectively.
D. melanogaster
P. Americana
To determine whether the OA/OAR system mediates the toxicity of certain plant essential oil monoterpenoids, fruit flies carrying the iav mutations, which are highly susceptible to the octopamine analogue p-cresol, are used in parallel with wild type fruit fly strain in the toxicity 5 bioassay test. The toxicity of cinnamic alcohol, eugenol, trans-anethole and 2-phenyethyl propionate is remarkably increased when they are topically applied to the iav strain, as shown in Table D.
Drosophila melanogaster
However, mutation of the octopamine synthesis does not affect the toxicity of p-cymene, methyl salicylate, and geraniol. Therefore, the current data suggests a correlation between agents inducing cellular changes in clonal cells expressing octopamine receptors and their insecticidal activity. The data also suggests that the insecticidal activity of cinnamic alcohol, eugenol, trans-anethole and 2-phenyethyl propionate is mediated through the octopamine/octopamine receptor system. From these data it can be concluded that the increase in the insecticidal activity of these chemicals results from the deficiency of octopamine synthesis in iav mutants because low octopamine levels may be unable to compete against the toxic effect of these chemicals.
As mentioned above, the toxicity data demonstrates significant differences between the toxicity of the tested chemicals against each insect (Table C). The toxicity data also demonstrates differences between the two insects in response to each chemical. The toxicity data against wild type and octopamine mutant (iav) fruit fly suggests that the toxicity of cinnamic alcohol, eugenol and trans-anethol is mediated through octopamine/octopamine receptors system. Among certain other plant essential oils tested against both strains of fruit fly only the toxicity of 2-phenylethyl propionate is mediated through octopamine receptors. Collectively the data suggest a correlation between cellular changes and toxicity of certain plant essential oils.
In the present example, chemical-structure relationships of plant essential oil monoterpenoids against wild type fruit fly suggest certain structural features required for chemical-receptor interaction. Among these features are the presence and location of a hydroxyl group, and a spacing group such as methoxy group. The rank order of toxicity demonstrates that cyclic alcohols and phenolic compounds are more toxic than other monoterpenoids such as acyclic alcohols and esters. The efficacy of each compound is found to be determined by the presence and location of the spacing group on the benzene ring. For example, although the phenolic derivative, eugenol, and propenyl benzene, trans-anethol, contain the same spacing group (—OCH3) on position 2 and 1, respectively, eugenol is 3-fold more toxic against wild type flies than trans-anethole (
In summary, the similarities and differences between both Pa oa1 and OAMB sequences are determining features in the toxicity differences of certain plant essential oil monoterpenoids. Additionally, it appears that the octopamine receptor mediates the insecticidal properties of cinnamic alcohol, eugenol, trans-anethole and 2-phenylethyl propionate and, in part, the toxicity of α-terpineol against Drosophila melanogaster fly. Furthermore, it appears that the presence of an electronegative group such as hydroxyl group, and different spacing groups, may be required for the insecticidal activity of plant essential oils through octopamine receptor.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. It is intended that the Specification and Example be considered as exemplary only, and not intended to limit the scope and spirit of the invention. The references and publications cited herein are incorporated herein by this reference.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as reaction conditions, and so forth used in the Specification, Examples, and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the Specification, Example, and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be determined by the present invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/554,968 filed Mar. 19, 2004, and is a continuation-in-part of commonly assigned and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/832,022 filed Apr. 26, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,541,155). The entire disclosures contained in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/554,968 and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/832,022 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,541,155 are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3943063 | Morishita et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3971852 | Brenner et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4211668 | Tate | Jul 1980 | A |
4320113 | Kydonieus | Mar 1982 | A |
4434181 | Marks et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4678775 | Nathanson | Jul 1987 | A |
4693890 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4696676 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4748860 | Butler et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4759228 | Butler et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4762718 | Marks, Sr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4764367 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4783457 | Nathanson | Nov 1988 | A |
4801446 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4801448 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808403 | Wilson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816248 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4818526 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4859463 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4876087 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4880625 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885855 | Marks et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4886662 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892871 | Nathanson | Jan 1990 | A |
4902504 | Wilson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4902690 | Nathanson | Feb 1990 | A |
4911906 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4943435 | Baker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4959209 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4970068 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4988507 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988508 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988509 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4990684 | Hoelderich et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4992270 | Wilson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5091423 | Wilson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5118711 | Wilson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126369 | Wilson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5134892 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5165926 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5175175 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5196200 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204372 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205065 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5228233 | Butler et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5250575 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5272179 | Butler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281621 | Wilson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5321048 | Wilson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327675 | Butler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5344776 | Venter et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5344847 | Wilson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354783 | Marin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366975 | Nathanson | Nov 1994 | A |
5387418 | Marin et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401500 | Warren et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5407609 | Tice et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409958 | Butler et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417009 | Butler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418010 | Janda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5439690 | Knight | Aug 1995 | A |
5439941 | Butler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441988 | Butler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447714 | Marin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5449695 | Marin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458882 | Marin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464626 | Warren et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472701 | Warren et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474898 | Venter et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5521165 | Warren et al. | May 1996 | A |
5576010 | Warren et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576011 | Butler et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593600 | Solomon | Jan 1997 | A |
5633236 | Warren et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635173 | Warren et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635174 | Warren et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5665781 | Warren et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683687 | Marin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693344 | Knight et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703104 | Peck et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5753686 | Marin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772983 | O'Connell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785982 | Warren et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5814325 | Rod | Sep 1998 | A |
5840669 | Neelakantan | Nov 1998 | A |
5855903 | Warren et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5980931 | Fowler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990178 | Ninkov | Nov 1999 | A |
5998484 | Zobitne et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004569 | Bessette et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006470 | Geoghegan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024874 | Lott | Feb 2000 | A |
6114384 | Bessette et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143288 | Warren et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6183767 | Bessette et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6255356 | Butler | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272790 | Paganessi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6322825 | Ninkov | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329433 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331572 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333302 | Beer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333360 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340710 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342535 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342536 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360477 | Flashinski et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368508 | Gatz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372801 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372803 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376556 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395789 | Bessette et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414036 | Ninkov | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451844 | Watkins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6506707 | Bessette | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6531163 | Bessette et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534099 | Bessette et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548085 | Zobitne et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555121 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6610254 | Furner et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6649660 | Ninkov | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660288 | Behan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670311 | Aldcroft et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689395 | Bessette | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713518 | Bessette et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6812258 | Bessette et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841577 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844369 | Ninkov | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849614 | Bessette et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6858653 | Bessette | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6887899 | Bessette | May 2005 | B1 |
6921539 | Ninkov | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949587 | Bessette | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6969522 | Bessette | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974584 | Bessette | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986898 | Bessette | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7008649 | Bessette et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7109240 | Bessette et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7201926 | Fried et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208519 | Ninkov | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238726 | Bessette | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7238798 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241806 | Bessette | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250175 | Bessette et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7291650 | Bessette et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7320966 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351420 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357939 | Bessette | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361366 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381431 | Baker et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20020028256 | Bessette | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034556 | Khazan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073928 | Ingman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076360 | Ingman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081230 | Ingman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096121 | Ingman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107287 | Bessette et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030026823 | Fried et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036530 | Bessette | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039674 | Bessette | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030091657 | Chiasson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091661 | Bessette | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108622 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108623 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030175369 | Khazan-Enache | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194454 | Bessette et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040146595 | Bessette et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156922 | Bessette et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040185080 | Hojo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192551 | Bessette | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213822 | Birch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040248791 | Spana et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004233 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008714 | Enan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013885 | Chiasson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019269 | Marks et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050070576 | Spooner-Hart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050136089 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143260 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147636 | Bessette et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163869 | Bessette et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170024 | Bessette et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050170025 | Bessette et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050170026 | Bessette et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050260241 | Bessette et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260242 | Bessette et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288227 | Marks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060088564 | Bessette | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115507 | Bessette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115508 | Bessette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115509 | Bessette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060115510 | Bessette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121074 | Bessette | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070098750 | Bessette | May 2007 | A1 |
20070178128 | Bessette | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190094 | Bessette | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207221 | Bessette et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070298131 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299037 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299038 | Bessette et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080003315 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003316 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003317 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004240 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015167 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015249 | Bessette et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020381 | Henrich et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032387 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038383 | Bessette et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080153904 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9854971 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9921891 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9933973 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0005964 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0021364 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0050566 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0051436 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0053020 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0075322 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0100020 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100026 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100032 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100033 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100034 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0100049 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0110214 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0118201 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0160163 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0191554 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0191556 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0191560 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03016477 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006968 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100971 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005092016 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050214267 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60554968 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10832022 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11086615 | US |