Medical isotopes are used to diagnose and treat approximately 40 million patients per year. The vast majority of these isotopes are created by the fission of uranium, in which a form of incident radiation strikes uranium nuclei and causes them to split into smaller “fission product” isotopes. The fission products contain a range of different isotopes, some of which have medical significance including Mo-99, I-131, Xe-133, and others. These fission-based isotopes are presently used in greater than 85% of the nuclear medicine procedures performed today.
Present methods to create medical isotopes typically involve using a high flux, critical nuclear reactor to create neutrons, and placing a specially designed solid uranium target proximal to the reactor core. Some neutrons produced by the reactor strike the uranium target, causing fission which creates the various isotopes. The isotopes remain embedded in the solid uranium target throughout the irradiation. After a period of time (typically several days), the reactor is shut down, and the solid target is withdrawn from its proximal location. The solid target is then moved to a processing area where it is converted to a liquid form by dissolution in acid. Once in liquid form, a variety of chemical processes are performed on the target to extract the desired isotopes. After these isotopes are extracted, the remaining solution is disposed of and not re-used.
During the irradiation and separation process, very little uranium is consumed, and nearly all of it is thrown away after the dissolution process. In addition, the separation takes extra time, often several hours, during which the desired isotopes undergo radioactive decay. These extra hours result in a loss of product that could be used in nuclear medicine procedures.
Finally, the process of irradiating a solid uranium target requires a very high reactor flux to obtain a high yield of medical isotopes, because relatively few neutrons created by the reactor actually make their way to the target. These reactors are also very expensive and produce a high level of nuclear waste (typically hundreds of times more) in comparison to the expense and waste generated using aqueous systems.
The present disclosure relates to methods of separating medical isotopes from a solution of uranium salts.
In one aspect, the disclosure provides a method of separating medical isotopes from uranium solutions. In an aspect, the disclosure relates to methods of separating an isotope from a first solution including uranium. The methods may suitably include (a) cleaning the first solution to form a second solution including the uranium and a third solution including the isotope; and (b) separating the isotope. In some embodiments, the method may further comprise oxidizing the isotope prior to step (b).
In another aspect, the disclosure relates to methods of producing medical isotopes. The methods may suitably include (a) irradiating a uranium solution to form a first solution including uranium and a daughter isotope; (b) contacting the first solution with a chemical separation medium to form a second solution including the uranium and a third solution including the daughter isotope; and (c) separating the daughter isotope from the third solution.
In a further aspect, the disclosure relates to methods of producing medical isotopes. The methods may suitably include (a) irradiating a uranium solution to form a first solution including uranium and an isotope; (b) extracting the isotope from the first solution; and (c) contacting a solution resulting from step (b) with a chemical separation medium to form a second solution including the uranium.
In yet another aspect, the disclosure relates to methods of producing isotopes. The methods may suitably include irradiating a uranium solution to yield a daughter isotope; separating remaining uranium from the solution; separating the daughter isotope from the solution; and extracting the daughter isotope.
The disclosure relates to other aspects and embodiments which will become apparent in view of the description and accompanying drawings.
In a general sense, the disclosure relates to methods and compositions for separating medical isotopes from a uranium solution. Medical isotopes may be generated in uranium solutions in, for example, aqueous nuclear reactor systems. An aqueous nuclear reactor or aqueous uranium target driven by an accelerator reduces some of the inefficiencies of solid target systems. In an aqueous system, uranium is dissolved into a liquid form (typically a nitrate or sulfate form) and irradiated to produce the desired isotopes. In certain embodiments, the uranium solution may suitably include at least one of uranyl nitrate, uranyl sulfate, uranyl fluoride, and uranyl phosphate, or a combination thereof. The incident radiation is either produced internally (in the case of a critical reactor) or externally (in the case of an accelerator-driven system). Fission occurs in the liquid as the irradiation proceeds and typically ceases after several days.
Either during or after the irradiation in aqueous systems, the uranium solution may be pumped to a separation filter that pulls out the medical isotopes of relevance. There is no need to dissolve the target as the medical isotopes are already in aqueous form, saving time and allowing for more of the rapidly decaying isotopes to reach their ultimate destination. Once the isotopes are separated, the uranium remains in solution and can be returned to the irradiation device for reuse. As such, an aqueous system can make more efficient use of the uranium. The separation of uranium and medical isotopes may be done continuously in a system of extraction and recycling. Alternatively, uranium and medical isotopes may be separated periodically, such as, for example, in a system of extraction and recycling during periods when the aqueous system is not irradiating.
Another advantage of an aqueous system is that the driving radiation is either internal (critical reactor) or directed (accelerator-driven system), and a substantial portion of the produced radiation contributes to isotope production. Highly efficient utilization of the incident radiation results in a tremendous reduction in nuclear waste. Finally, since these systems are relatively simple and small compared to a high flux reactor, they may be less expensive and safer to operate.
Another advantage of an aqueous system is that the incident radiation flux in an aqueous system may be lower than in conventional methods such as those using a high flux reactor. A lower incident radiation flux can be used and still maintain similar rates of isotope production by using a larger volume of solution, by operating with a higher concentration of uranium in solution, or by a combination of these two. However, operation with a very high volume of uranium solution has the disadvantage of requiring a greater total amount of radiation and requiring more time for processing to isolate the desired isotopes. Operating at high uranium concentrations may increase the difficulty of separating the desired isotopes from the uranium solution.
It is known that aqueous systems have other potential disadvantages, e.g., in systems that reuse uranium, impurities build up in the system with each subsequent irradiation. Eventually, these impurities will build up to the point where the medical isotope product is difficult to purify to a degree of purity suitable for medical use. At this time, the uranium solution should be discarded and replaced, which wastes most of the uranium. Replacement of the uranium is expensive and results in a greater total waste volume.
Another disadvantage with aqueous systems is that the oxidation state of an important medical isotope, such as Mo-99, may be altered from its ideal state by the harsh environment of the reactor. While Mo-99 can be returned to the proper state by chemical reaction, the reagents needed often confound reuse of the solution in the reactor, and they may be difficult to subsequently separate.
In certain aspects of the methods disclosed herein, uranium, which may be reused in the aqueous system, and the desired isotopes may be separately isolated in a manner that overcomes many disadvantages of aqueous systems as discussed above. Isotopes or radioisotopes may include a medical isotope. Medical isotopes may include, but are not limited to, Mo-99, I-131, I-125, In-111, Xe-133, Y-90, Pd-103, Ru-106, and Cs-137. The methods disclosed herein may be particularly advantageous with respect to high concentration uranium solutions. For example, the first solution including uranium may include uranium in an amount or concentration of at least about 10 g/L, at least about 12 g/L, at least about 14 g/L, at least about 16 g/L, at least about 18 g/L, or at least about 20 g/L. The first solution including uranium may include uranium in an amount or concentration of less than about 1000 g/L, less than about 900 g/L, less than about 800 g/L, or less than about 700 g/L. The first solution including uranium may include uranium in an amount or concentration of about 10 to about 1000 g/L, about 12 to about 900 g/L, about 14 to about 800 g/L, or about 16 to about 700 g/L.
In an aspect, the disclosure provides methods of separating an isotope from a first solution including uranium, wherein uranium is extracted from the first solution before the isotopes (i.e., daughter isotopes, e.g., medical isotopes) are separated.
In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides a method of separating an isotope from a first solution including uranium, the first solution generated by irradiation in an aqueous system. The methods may suitably include (a) cleaning the first solution to form a second solution including the uranium and a third solution including the isotope; and (b) separating the isotope from the third solution.
The solution cleanup step (e.g., the step to clean the first solution to form a second solution including the uranium and a third solution including the isotope) includes a process that substantially separates uranium from the first solution before the isotopes are extracted. Once the uranium is removed, an oxidation step may be implemented without detriment to subsequent separation or reaction steps because the solution at that point will no longer be reused in the reactor. Separation of uranium from the first solution before extracting isotopes also allows for simpler chemical processes to remove the medical isotopes from the remaining solution. After separation of the useful isotopes, the remaining byproducts are disposed of. The uranium that is separated is very pure, and may go back into the aqueous system for irradiation. Unlike in previously described systems, impurities are not able to build up and the uranium remains reusable until it is completely consumed.
Methods that may be used to separate the uranium in the solution cleanup step include any solvent extraction process known in the art. Examples of solvent extraction processes include, but are not limited to, a UREX process, a PUREX process, and a TRUEX process. Examples of UREX processes are described in M. C. Thompson et al. (“Demonstration of the UREX Solvent Extraction Process with Dresden Reactor Fuel Solution,” Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Sep. 30, 2002, WSRC-TR-2002-00444) and Schroeder et al. (“Technetium and Iodine Separations in the UREX Proces,” Accelerator Transmutation of Waste Program, 2001, Final Report for WBS 1.24.01.01), which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
One such UREX solvent extraction process is illustrated in
As shown in
Once the uranium is separated, the desired daughter isotope in the remaining solution can be separated, for example, by applying the solution to or passing the solution through a metal oxide column or resin or medium. Metal oxides may include, but are not limited to, alumina, titania, zirconia, as well as alloys and combinations thereof. Suitably, the isotope is bound by the metal oxide column. In certain embodiments, an appropriate oxidizer is optionally added to the solution to restore the isotopes (most significantly, Mo-99) to the proper oxidation state for separation. The isotope may also be oxidized before applying it to the metal oxide. Alternatively, an oxidizer may be applied to the isotope during or after application to the metal oxide. For example, in some embodiments, the oxidizer may be added to a metal oxide column with isotope to elute the isotope from the column. Oxidizers may include, but are not limited to, hydrogen peroxide, potassium permanganate, sodium hypochlorite, and molecular oxygen. Optionally, the pH may be raised to a suitable pH to aide elution of a desired isotope from the metal oxide. For example, the pH adjusters may include, but are not limited to, sodium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, and other suitable basic solutions. As such, the isotope may be separated by elution from the metal oxide.
Separation of uranium before extraction of isotopes has many advantages. The beneficial effects of separating uranium before extraction of the isotopes include increased uranium lifetime, as well as increased separation efficiency of Mo-99 and other isotopes. Furthermore, the system can operate with a higher uranium concentration, thereby minimizing uranium costs and solution volumes. Additionally, impurity buildup in the uranium solution is substantially reduced.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides methods of separating an isotope from a first solution including uranium, wherein the isotope is extracted from the first solution before the uranium is separated. In certain embodiments, methods of producing medical radioisotopes are provided, wherein the methods may suitably include (a) irradiating a uranium solution to form a first solution including uranium and an isotope; (b) extracting the isotope from the first solution; and (c) contacting a solution resulting from step (b) with a chemical separation medium to form a second solution including the uranium. The isotope may be optionally oxidized as described above. The isotope may be extracted from the first solution as described above, for example, using a metal oxide column. The uranium may be separated using a chemical separation medium as described above, for example, using a UREX process.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in this description or illustrated in the following figures. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including but not limited to”) unless otherwise noted. The use of “including,” “including,” “having,” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. “Including” encompasses the terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of.” The use of “consisting essentially of” means that the composition or method may include additional ingredients and/or steps, but only if the additional ingredients and/or steps do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition or method. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to illustrate aspects and embodiments of the disclosure and does not limit the scope of the claims. Unless otherwise noted, technical terms are used according to conventional usage.
All publications, patents and patent applications referenced in this specification are indicative of the level of ordinary skill in the art to which this application pertains. All publications, patents and patent applications are herein expressly incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated by reference. In case of conflict between the present disclosure and the incorporated patents, publications and references, the present disclosure should control.
Thus, the disclosure provides, among other things, a method to separate medical isotopes from uranium solutions with an integrated cleanup step. Various features and advantages of the disclosure are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/480,214, filed Apr. 28, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2161985 | Szilard | Jun 1939 | A |
2837476 | Busey | Jun 1958 | A |
2853446 | Abbott et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2907884 | Gale | Oct 1959 | A |
2992333 | Gale | Jul 1961 | A |
3030543 | Luce | Apr 1962 | A |
3079319 | McGrath et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3085966 | Flora | Apr 1963 | A |
3218235 | Ehler | Nov 1965 | A |
3258402 | Farnsworth | Jun 1966 | A |
3276965 | Leyse | Oct 1966 | A |
3386883 | Farnsworth | Jun 1968 | A |
3418206 | Hall et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3448314 | Bounden et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3473056 | Ferry | Oct 1969 | A |
3530497 | Hirsch et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3617908 | Greber | Nov 1971 | A |
3624240 | Damm et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3629588 | Eyrich | Dec 1971 | A |
3634704 | Stix et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3663858 | Lisitano | May 1972 | A |
3668066 | Hendel et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3676672 | Meckel et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3713967 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3718836 | Bain et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3719893 | dePackh | Mar 1973 | A |
3746859 | Hilton et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3794875 | Stark | Feb 1974 | A |
3799883 | Arino | Mar 1974 | A |
3925676 | Bigham et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3992625 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4008411 | Brugger et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4137012 | Porta et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4147590 | Szekely | Apr 1979 | A |
4202725 | Jarnagin | May 1980 | A |
4311912 | Givens | Jan 1982 | A |
4314879 | Hartman et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4370295 | Bussard | Jan 1983 | A |
4431580 | Schneider | Feb 1984 | A |
4528003 | Dittrich et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4529571 | Bacon et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4650630 | Boyer | Mar 1987 | A |
4663110 | Cheng | May 1987 | A |
4752432 | Bida et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4793961 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800060 | Goldring | Jan 1989 | A |
4826646 | Bussard | May 1989 | A |
4853173 | Stenbacka | Aug 1989 | A |
4976938 | Knize et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5037602 | Dabiri et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053184 | Cluzeau et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5126574 | Gallagher | Jun 1992 | A |
5152956 | Bernardet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5215703 | Bernardet | Jun 1993 | A |
5280505 | Hughey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
RE34575 | Klinkowstein et al. | Apr 1994 | E |
5410574 | Masumoto et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5468355 | Shefer et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482865 | Ferrieri et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5508010 | Sameh | Apr 1996 | A |
5586153 | Alvord | Dec 1996 | A |
5596611 | Ball | Jan 1997 | A |
5729580 | Millspaugh | Mar 1998 | A |
5745536 | Brainard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745537 | Verschoore | Apr 1998 | A |
5812621 | Takeda et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5854531 | Young et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870447 | Powell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5898279 | Ezzedine et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5910971 | Ponomarev-Stepnoy et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920601 | Nigg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940461 | Takeda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5977554 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011825 | Welch et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6141395 | Nishimura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6337055 | Betenekov et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6417634 | Bergstrom | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6544606 | Pennington et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567492 | Kiselev et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6593686 | Yui | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6777699 | Miley et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6835358 | Hemingway et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6845137 | Ruth et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850011 | Monkhorst et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870894 | Leung et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891911 | Rostoker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907097 | Leung | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917044 | Amini | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922455 | Jurczyk et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925137 | Forman | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7200198 | Wieland et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230201 | Miley et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7235216 | Kiselev et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7342988 | Leung et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362842 | Leung | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7419604 | Atwood | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7968838 | Dent | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7978804 | Groves et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8475747 | Johnson | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8767905 | Neeley et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020150193 | Leung et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030152186 | Jurczyk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030223528 | Miley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040100214 | Erdman | May 2004 | A1 |
20050061994 | Behrouz | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069076 | Bricault et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082469 | Carlo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129162 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060017411 | Hamm | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023829 | Schenter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060062342 | Lepera et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104401 | Jongen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070036261 | Kim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070108922 | Amaldi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133734 | Fawcett et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160176 | Wada | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070273308 | Fritzler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297554 | Lavie et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023645 | Amelia et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080224106 | Johnson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090129532 | Reyes, Jr. et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090213977 | Russell, II et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225923 | Neeley et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090279658 | Leblanc | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090316850 | Langenbrunner | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100063344 | Kotschenreuther et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100193685 | Chu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284502 | Piefer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110051876 | Ahfeld et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091000 | Stubbers et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110176648 | Rowland et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110180698 | Stephenson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120300890 | Pfiefer | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300891 | Pfiefer | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150092900 | Piefer et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20190105630 | Hasan | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2294063 | Dec 1998 | CA |
1134197 | Oct 1996 | CN |
1922695 | Feb 2007 | CN |
102084434 | Jun 2011 | CN |
535235 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0632680 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1134 771 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1233425 | Aug 2002 | EP |
2711835 | May 1995 | FR |
829093 | Feb 1960 | GB |
1187244 | Apr 1970 | GB |
40-24599 | Oct 1965 | JP |
59068143 | Apr 1984 | JP |
03190097 | Aug 1991 | JP |
6160595 | Jun 1994 | JP |
09113693 | May 1997 | JP |
11057043 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001042098 | Feb 2001 | JP |
3145555 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001338800 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002062388 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002214395 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2005127800 | May 2005 | JP |
2007165250 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008102078 | May 2008 | JP |
2004115750 | May 2005 | RU |
WO 9114268 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9859347 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 0103142 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0131678 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 03019996 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 04053892 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 06000104 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 06015864 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 07002455 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 07040024 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 09100063 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009135163 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2009142669 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2013187974 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Peter Tkac, Alena Paulenova “Speciation of Molybdenum (VI) in Aqueous and Organic Phases of Selected Extraction Systems” Separation Science and Technology 43:2641-2675 (2008). |
Bürck, J., Sameh A. Ali, and H. J. Ache. “Sorption Behaviour of Molybdenum on Different Metal Oxide Ion Exchangers.” Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange 6.1 (1988): 167-182. abstract available online: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07366298808917930>. (Year: 1988). |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2011/507694 dated Jul. 24, 2014 (3 pages). |
“The Burr Amendment” “2005 Energy Act,” Congressional Record, pp. S7237-S7244 (Jun. 23, 2005). |
“The Schumer Amendment” “Comprehensive Report on H.R. 776” Congressional Record, p. H12103 (Oct. 5, 1992). |
“U.S. Radioisotope Supply,” American Nuclear Society Position Statement 30:(Jun. 2004). |
Abraham, S., “Remarks by Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham on the Global Threat Reduction Initiative,” Speech to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, (May 26, 2004). |
Agostinelli, S., et al, “Geant4-A Simulation Toolkit,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 506:250-303 (2003). |
Angelone, M. et al., “Conceptual Study of a Compact Accelerator-Driven Neutron Source for Radioisotope Production, Boron Neutron Capture Therapy and Fast Neutron Therapy,” Nuc. Instr. & Methods in Physics Res. A:487:585-594 (2002). |
Armstrong, D.D. et al., “Progress Report on Testing of a 100-kV, 125-mA Deuterium Injector,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science NS-26, No. 3 (1979). |
Armstrong, D.D. et al., “Tests of the Intense Neutron Source Prototype” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science NS-26, No. 3 (1979). |
Austen, I., “Reactor Shutdown Causing Medical Isotope Shortage,” The New York Times, (Dec. 6, 2007). |
Bakel, A.J. et al., “Thermoxid Sorbents for the Separation and Purification of 99Mo,” 26th International Meeting on RERTR, Vienna, Austria, (Nov. 7-12, 2004). |
Ball, R.M. et al., “Present Status of the Use of LEU in Aqueous Reactors to Produce Mo-99,” 1998 International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Sao Paulo,( Oct. 18-23, 1998). |
Barbry, F. “Criticality Accident Studies and Research Performed in the Valduc Criticality Laboratory, France,” IAEA-TECDOC-1601: 39-48 (2008). |
Barnett, C.F., “Atomic Data for Fusion, vol. 1: Collisions of H, H2, He and Li Atoms with Molecules,” ORNL “Redbooks” 6086 (1990). |
Barschall, H.H., “Intense Sources of Fast Neutrons,” Ann. Rev. Nuclear Part. Sci. 28:207-237 (1978). |
Biodex, Pulmonex II® Xenon System: http://www.biodex.com/radio/lungvent/lung_502feat.htm. Accessed: (Jun. 1 2010). |
Bosch, H., et al. “Improved Formulas for Fusion Cross-Sections and Thermal Reactivities,” Nuclear Fusion 32:4: 611-631 (1992). |
Bradley, E. et al., “Homogeneous Aqueous Solution Nuclear Reactors for the Production of Mo-99 and Other Short Lived Radioisotopes,” IAEA-TECDOC-1601: 1-13 (2008). |
Brown, R. W., “The Radiopharmaceutical Industry's Effort to Migrate Toward Mo-99 Production Utilizing LEU,” The 2005 RERTR International Meeting, (Nov. 6-10, 2005). |
Bunker, M.E. “Status Report on the Water Boiler Reactor,” Los Alamos Technical Reports LA-2854 (Oct. 1963). |
Calamai, P., “Chalk River Crisis Sired by AECL,” TheStar.com, (Jan. 19, 2008). |
Cappiello, C. et al., “Lessons Learned from 64 Years of Experience with Aqueous Homogeneous Reactors,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-10-02947 (May 2010). |
Celona, L. et al., “Status of the Trasco Intense Proton Source and Emittance Measurements,” Rev. of Sci. Instrum. 75:5: 1423 (2004). |
Chakin, V.P., et al. “High dose neutron irradiation damage in beryllium as blanket material,” Fusion Engineering and Design 58-59: 535-541 (Nov. 2001). |
Chenevert, G.M. et al., “A Tritium Gas Target as an Intense Source of 14 MeV Neutrons,” Nucl. Instr. and Methods 145: 149-155 (1977). |
Cheng, Z. et al., “Preliminary Study of 99Mo Extraction Process from Uranly[sic]-Nitrate Fuel Solution of Medical Isotope Production Reactor,” Homogeneous Aqueous Solution Nuclear reactors for the Production of Mo-99 and Other Short Lived Radioisotopes, IAEA-TECDOC-1601: 27-35 (2008). |
Cipiti, B.B., “Fusion Transmutation of Waste: Design and Analysis of the In-Zinerator Concept,” Sandia Report, SAND2006-6590, (Nov. 2006). |
Cohilis, P., “Recent Advances in the Design of a Cyclotron-Driven, Intense, Subcritical Neutron Source,” Proc. Of the Fifth European Particle Physics Conference, EPAC'96, (Jun. 10-14, 1996). |
Committee on Medical Isotope Production Without Highly Enriched Uranium, National Research Council of the National Academies. Medical Isotope Production Without Highly Enriched Uranium. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2009). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12569 Accessed (Jun. 1, 2010). |
Conner, C. et al., “Production of Mo-99 from LEU Targets Acid-side Processing,” 2000 Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Las Vegas, Nevada, (Oct. 1-6, 2000). |
DeJesus, O.T. et al., “Preparation and Purification of 77Br-Labeled p-Bromospiroperidol Suitable for in vivo Dopamine Receptor Studies,” J. Label. Comp. Radiopharm., 20: 745-756 (1983). |
Deluca, P.M., “Performance of a Gas Target Neutron Source for Radiotherapy,” Phys. Med. Biol., 23:5: 876-887 (1978). |
Demchenko, P.O., “A Neutron Source on a Basis of a Subcritical Assembly Driven by a Deuteron Linac,” Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 46:2:31-33 (2006). |
Department of Defense. “Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook,” (May 2005). |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 09739965.3 dated Sep. 19, 2012 (4 pages). |
Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF): http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm. Database Version of May 31, 2010. Accessed (May 3, 2010). |
Fraser, S., “Special Examination Report on Atomic Energy of Canada Limited—2007, OAG Special Examination Report on Atomic Energy of Canada Limited”, (Jan. 29, 2008). |
Ganjali, M.R. et al., “Novel Method for the Fast Separation and Purification of Molybdenum(VI) from Fission Products of Uranium with Aminofunctionalized Mesoporous Molecular Sieves (AMMS) Modified by Dicyclohexyl-18-Crown-6 and S—N Tetradentate Schiff's Base,” Analytical Letters, 38:1813-1821 (2005). |
Gobin, R. et al., “High Intensity ECR Ion Source (H+, D+, H—Developments at CEA/Saclay,” Rev. of Sci. Instrum. 73:2: 922 (2002). |
Gohar, Y., “Accelerator-driven Subcritical Facility: Conceptual Design Development,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 562:870-874 (2006). |
Hamilton, T., “Reactor Shutdown Leaves Cancer Patients in Limbo,” TheStar.com, (Dec. 5, 2007). |
IAEA, “Alternative Technologies for 99mTc Generators,” IAEA-TECDOC-852, (Dec. 1995). |
Kahn, L.H., “The Potential Dangers in Medical Isotope Production,” The Bulletin Online, (Mar. 17, 2008). |
King, LDP; Hammond, RP; Leary, JA; Bunker, ME; Wykoff, WR. “Gas Recombination System for a Homogeneous Reactor,” Nucleonics 11:9:25-29 (Sep. 1953). |
Kitten, S. et al., “Solution-reactor-produced Mo-99 using activated carbon to remore[sic] 1-131,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-UR--98-522 (Jun. 1998). |
Kulcinski, G.L. “Near Term Commercial Opportunities from Long Range Fusion Research,” 12th Annual Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Power, (Jun. 16-20, 1996). |
Kulcinski, G.L., et al., “Alternate Applications of Fusion-Production of Radioisotopes” Fusion Science and Technology 44:559 (2003). |
Kuperman, A.J., “Bomb-Grade Bazaar,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 62:2:44-50 (Mar./Apr. 2006). |
Kwan, J.D. et al., “A 2.45 GHz High Current Ion Source for Neutron Production,” 17th International Workshop on ECR Ion Sources and Their Applications, Lanzhou, China, (Sep. 17-21, 2006). |
Maclachlan, A. “NRG to Study Potential for Use of LEU for Mo-99,” Nuclear Fuel, 32:26, (Dec. 17, 2007). |
MDS-Nordion. “Mo-99 Fact Sheet: Molybdenum-99 Fission Radiochemical”: http://www.nordion.com/documents/products/Mo-99_Bel.pdf (2009). Accessed (Jun. 1, 2010). |
Meade, C. et al., “Considering the Effects of a Catastrophic Terrorist Attack,” RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy Report, (2006). |
Mirzadeh, S., “Production Capabilities in U.S. Nuclear Reactors for Medical Radioisotopes,” ORNL report, ORNL/TM-12010, (Nov. 1992). |
Mutalib, A., “Full Scale Demonstration of the Cintichem Process for the Production of Mo-99 Using a Low Enriched Target,” ANL Report ANL/CMT/CP-97560, (Sep. 1999). |
Newsline, “Shortage of Molybdenum-99 Due to Strike at NRU Reactor,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 38:8, (Aug. 1997). |
Nickles, R.J. “Production of a Broad Range of Radionuclides with an 11 MeV Proton Cyclotron,” J Label Comp Radiopharm 30:120 (1991). |
Nortier, F.M. et al., “Investigation of the thermal performance of solid targets for radioisotope production,” Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 355:236 (1995). |
Ogawa, K; et al., “Development of solution behavior observation system under criticality accident conditions in TRACY,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 37:12:1088-1097 (Dec. 2000). |
Osso, J.A., “Preparation of a Gel of Zirconium Molybdate for use in the Generators of 99Mo-99mTc Prepared with 99Mo Produced by the 98Mo(n,γ)99Mo Reaction,” 1998 International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, (Oct. 18-23, 1998). |
Piefer, G. “Performance of a Low Pressure, Helicon Driven IEC Helium-3 Fusion Device,” Ph.D. Thesis (Dec. 2006). |
Risler, R., “20 Years of Clinical Therapy Operation with the Fast Neutron Therapy System in Seattle,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Cyclotrons and Their Applications, (Oct. 18-22, 2004). |
Schueller, M.J. et al., “Production and Extraction of 10CO2 From Proton Bombardment of Molten 10B2O3.” Am Inst Physics Press (Oct. 2002). |
Sherman, J. “High-Current Proton and Deuterium Extraction Systems,” Procedings of the 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference, Albuquerque, NM: 1835 (2007). |
Sherman, J.D. et al., “A 75-keV, 140-mA Proton Injector,” Rev. of Scientific Instruments 73:2 917 (Feb. 2002). |
Sherman, J.D. et al., “Proton Injector for cw-Mode Linear Accelerators,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1099: 102 (2008). |
Song, Z. et al., “Minipermanent Magnet High-Current Microwave Ion Source,” Rev. of Sci. Instrum. 77 03A305 (2006). |
Stacey, W.M, “Capabilities of a DT Tokamak Fusion Neutron Source for Driving a Spent Nuclear Fuel Transmutation Reactor,” Nuclear Fusion, 41:2:135-154 (2001). |
Taylor, T. et al., “An Advanced High-Current Low-Emittance dc Microwave Proton Source,” Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Res Part A 336:1 (1993). |
Underhill, DW. “The Adsorption of Argon, Krypton and Xenon on Activated Charcoal,” Health Phs. 71:2:160-166 (1996). |
Vandegrift, G. “ANL (GFV) Perspective on Conversion of Mo-99 Production from High-to Low-Enriched Uranium,” Presentation to the National Academies Committee on Medical Isotope Production without Highly Enriched Uranium, Washington D.C. (Apr. 10, 2007). |
Vandegrift, G. F. et al., “RERTR Progress in Mo-99 Production from LEU,” 6th International Topical Meeting Research Reactor Fuel Management (RRFM), Ghent, Belgium, Mar. 17-20, 2002. |
Vandegrift, G.F. et al. “Production of Mo-99 from LEU Targets Base-side Processing,” Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Las Vegas, Nevada, (Oct. 1-6, 2000). |
Von Hippel, F.N. et al., “Feasibility of Eliminating the Use of Highly Enriched Uranium in the Production of Medical Radioisotopes,” Science and Global Security, 14:151-162 (2006). |
Vucina, J. L. “Elution Efficiency of Mo-99/Tc-99m Generators,” Facta Universitatis—Series: Physics, Chemistry and Technology, 2:3:125-130 (2001). |
Weidner, J.W. et al. “Production of 13N via Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusion,” Fusion Science and Technology 44: 539 (2003). |
William, B. et al., “Proliferation Dangers Associated with Nuclear Medicine: Getting Weapons-Grade Uranium Out of Radiopharmaceutical Production,” Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 23:4:267-281 (Dec. 2007). |
Zabetakis, M.G., “Flammability Characteristics of Combustible Gases and Vapors,” Bulleltin 627, US Bureau of Mines (1965). |
Ziegler, J. “Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter,” www.srim.org (2008) Accessed (Jun. 1, 2010). |
Bussard, R.W. “Some Physics Considerations of Magnetic Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement: A New Concept for Spherical Converging-flow Fusion,” Fusion Technology 19: 273 (1991). |
Collins, K.E. et al., “Extraction of High Specific Activity Radionuclides from Reactor-Irradiated [alpha]—Phthalocyanine Targets,” Radiochem. Radioanalyt. Left. 41: 129-132 (1979). |
DeJesus, O.T. et al., “Production and Purification of Zr-89, a Potential PET Antibody Label,” Appl. Radiat. Isotopes., Int.J. Radiat. Appl. Instr. Part A, 41:789-790 (1990). |
Galy, J. et al., “A Neutron Booster for Spallation Sources-Application to Accelerator driven Systems and Isotope Production,” Nuc. Instr. & Methods in Physics Res., 485:3:739-752 (2002). |
Hirsch, R. L. “Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement of Ionized Fusion Gases” J. App. Phys. 38:4522-4534 (1967). |
Kulcinski, G. L., “Non-electric power, near term applications of fusion energy” 18th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, Albuquerque, NM, USA (1999) 5-8. |
Lone, M.A., “Syrup Neutron Cross Sect. 10-40 JV1eV. Rep.:” BNL-NCS-50681, pp. 79-116 (1977). |
Olhoett, G., “Applications and Frustrations in Using Ground Penetrating Radar,” Aerospace and Electronics Systems Magazine, IEEE, 21:2:.12-20, (2002). |
Radel et al., “Detection of Highly Enriched Uranium Using a Pulsed D—D Fusion Source,” Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 52. No. 4, pp. 1087-1091 (2007). |
Russoto, R.L. et al., “Measurement of fuel ion temperatures in ICF implosions using current mode neutron time of flight detectors” Review of Scientific Instrumentation, 61:10:3125-3127 (1990). |
Sabatier, J.M., “A Study on the Passive Detection of Clandestine Tunnels,” 2008 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp. 353-358, (May 12-13, 2008). |
Schiller et al., “Electron Beam Technology,” Wiley-Interscience p. 59; Fig. F (XP002545103) (1982). |
Stolarczyk, L.G., “Detection of Underground Tunnels with a Synchronized Electromagnetic Wave Gradiometer,” AFRL-VS-HA-TR-2005-1066, ARFL Technical Report, (2005). |
Yoshikawa, K., et al., “Research and development of landmine detection system by a compact fusion neutron source”, 16th Topical Meeting on Fusion Energy, Madison, WI, USA, O-1-6.4 (2004) 1224-1228. |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200980123452.6 dated Feb. 17, 2013 (12 pages—English Translation). |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 200980123452.6 dated Feb. 11, 2014 (9 pages—English Translation). |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2011/507694 dated Jun. 4, 2013 (Translation and Original, 9 pages). |
PCT/US2011/23024 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2011 (14 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/031837 dated Dec. 6, 2013 (9 pages). |
PCT/US2008/088485 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 18, 2009 (14 pages). |
PCT/US2009/042587 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 11, 2010 (9 pages). |
PCT/US2009/042587 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 16, 2009 (9 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 200980123452.6 dated Oct. 23, 2014 (14 pages, English translation included). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,758 dated May 7, 2014 (14 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2011-507694 dated Feb. 9, 2015 (3 pages—Statement of relevance included). |
Korean Patent Office Action for Application No. 10-2010-7027045 dated Mar. 30, 2015 (10 pages—English translation included). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,758 dated Mar. 23, 2015 (17 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Apr. 20, 2015 (13 pages). |
Japanese Patent Office action for Application No. 2013-249823 dated Nov. 10, 2014 (2 pages—Statement of relevance included). |
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2013-249823 dated Oct. 15, 2015 (6 pages) English translation only. |
Canadian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2723224 dated Jun. 5, 2015 (5 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 200980123452.6 dated Apr. 22, 2015 (7 pages, English translation included). |
Korean Patent Office Action for Application No. 10-2016-7015856 dated Sep. 27, 2016 (11 pages with English translation). |
Japanese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2013-249823 dated Aug. 16, 2016 (3 pages with English translation). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Feb. 5, 2016 (13 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2723224 dated Jun. 10, 2016 (3 pages). |
Korean Patent Office Action for Application No. 10-2010-7027045 dated Feb. 15, 2016. |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201380018865.4 dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 09739965.3 dated Nov. 26, 2015. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,758 dated Jul. 21, 2016 (14 pages). |
Russian Patent Office Decision to Grant a Patent for Invention dated for Application No. 2014144290 Jan. 26, 2018 (14 pages). |
Keele et al. “Solubility relations of uranyl fluoride-hydrofluoric acid-boric acid.” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 17.3 (1972): 330-332. |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,658 dated Apr. 20, 2018 (14 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2013800188654 dated Jul. 26, 2017 (16 pages, English translation included). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201510976878.3 dated Mar. 3, 2017 (22 pages, English translation included). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Jul. 27, 2018 (17 pages). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 2013800188654 dated Apr. 17, 2018 (7 pages, English translation included). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201510976878.3 dated Nov. 13, 2017 (10 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Nov. 24, 2017 (20 pages). |
Russian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2014144290 dated Oct. 31, 2016 (12 pages with English translation). |
Chinese Patent Office Action for Application No. 201380018865.4 dated Nov. 28, 2016 (17 pages with English translation). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Feb. 21, 2017 (17 pages). |
United States Patent Office Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/990,758 dated Apr. 10, 2017 (8 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2,723,224 dated Mar. 30, 2017 (4 pages). |
Canadian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2,869,559 dated Jan. 25, 2019 (4 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,658 dated Dec. 28, 2018 (14 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated Mar. 15, 2019 (23 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,497 dated Jul. 16, 2019 (17 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,658 dated Jul. 18, 2019 (11 pages). |
Korean Patent Office Action for Application No. 10-2014-7031068 dated Aug. 28, 2019 (10 pages, English translation included). |
Canadian Patent Office Action for Application No. 2,869,559 dated Jan. 22, 2020 (4 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,497 dated Feb. 10, 2020 (16 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,658 dated Apr. 6, 2020 (11 pages). |
United States Patent Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/575,826 dated May 18, 2020 (28 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120300891 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61480214 | Apr 2011 | US |