Methods of separation of materials in an under-balanced drilling operation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6234258
  • Patent Number
    6,234,258
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 8, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 22, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed are improved methods of separation and control of drilling fluids in under-balanced drilling. The separated returning stream materials are measured and used to control the additive gas mixing process to maintain under-balanced drilling conditions. Separation is conducted at reduced pressures to improve gas separation efficiencies. Preferably, separation is performed in multiple steps of pressure drops to eliminate foaming and to enhance gas removal.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to improvements in separation methods in under-balanced subterranean well drilling operations.




BACKGROUND




In under-balanced drilling, as opposed to conventional drilling, down-hole well pressure at the formation is maintained below the formation pressure by the utilization of a relatively light base drilling fluid. The under-balanced condition avoids contamination of the formation by reducing the chances that the drilling fluids and the “cuttings,” suspended solids produced by the action of the drill bit, will be forced into the permeable reservoir formation. Several types of base drilling fluid may be used in under-balanced drilling. Water-based and oil-based drilling muds may be used, however, water and lighter oil-based fluids, such as diesel fuel and crude oil, are more commonly used. In some situations the base drilling fluid will have a specific gravity too high to successfully use in an under-balanced well. In such situations, the controlled mixture of additives, such as nitrogen gas, to the base drilling fluid produces an operating fluid of a specific gravity selected to maintain an under-balanced well.




The higher formation pressures usually result in well formation fluids, such as hydrocarbon oil, hydrocarbon gas and well water, flowing into the well and mixing with the operating fluid and cuttings. The returning drilling stream reaches the surface wellhead as a mixture of formation oil, formation gas, well water, solid cuttings and operating fluid. If the operating fluid is oil-based, any liquid hydrocarbons produced from the well will mix with the operating fluid. Similarly, if the operating fluid is water-based, any well water produced will mix with the water-based operating fluid. If additive gasses were mixed in forming the operating fluid, the additive gases will mix with any hydrocarbon gas produced in the well.




In under-balanced drilling the returning drilling stream is at elevated pressures and when separation of the stream elements is desired, separation must be performed in a closed container or tank. Unfortunately, liquid-gas separation is less efficient when performed at elevated pressure levels. It is important to remove as much hydrocarbon gas from the base drilling fluids as possible. Basic hydrocarbon equilibrium phase behavior dictates that lowering the separation pressure reduces the hydrocarbon gas remaining in solution as a liquid. However, reducing the separation pressure, to release the gas from the liquid, increases the actual gas volume, thereby complicating gas handling and flow issues. In conventional, balanced drilling the operating fluid is not impregnated with large quantities of well formation fluids and, consequently, the operating fluid does not need to be separated from the returning stream at the surface at elevated pressures.




In a closed, balanced drilling system, controlling the specific gravity of the operating fluid flowing into the well is relatively uncomplicated, making maintenance of the stability of the well relatively simple. In under-balanced drilling the fluid mixture circulating in the well is not a closed system because of the addition of formation fluids down-hole. The influx of these formation fluids and gases greatly complicates the problem of under-balance pressure control through operating fluid specific gravity management.




Separation of the well formation fluids from the base drilling fluids is necessary before the base drilling fluids may be returned to the well and is accomplished by processing the returning stream through a separation system. The separation system should have the capacity to remove approximately the same or in excess of the volume of gas from the returning stream as is being added to the operating fluids down-hole. That is, the separation system should keep up with production of formation gas from the well to maintain the stability of the well during drilling operations.




Complicating matters, the separation system must handle typical wellhead pressures of the returning stream, which during under-balanced drilling can range from 25 psi to 3000 psi. Wellhead pressures are typically maintained as low as possible but still high enough to handle the returning stream volume. Reducing the pressure of the returning stream from the wellhead operating pressure by venting into a closed chamber can cause foaming, which reduces the efficiency of the liquid-gas separation process.




During drilling a large volume of heavy cuttings is produced and returned to the surface wellhead in the returning stream. In conventional drilling the returning stream is treated with shale shakers and mud pits. In under-balanced drilling it is necessary to remove the cuttings, or solids produced during drilling, from the returning stream mixture in the pressurized tanks to prevent clogging of the tanks. For safety reasons, in under-balanced drilling, it is first necessary to remove the gases from the returning stream. Removal of the solids from the pressurized chambers without shutting down the drilling operation presents difficulties.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present inventions contemplate improved methods and for separation and control of drilling fluids in under-balanced drilling. The present invention separate the base drilling fluids from the solids, additives and well gas and liquids; continuously measures the separated gases and liquids and calculates the amount of additives needed to attain the desired operating fluid specific gravity to maintain control of the under-balanced drilling. The present inventions also perform liquid-gas separation at a reduced returning drilling fluid pressure. As an added advantage, the methods of the present inventions can be used with (upstream of) conventional atmospheric pressure shale shakers, mud pits and the like. In addition, the present invention uses a multi-stage (two or more) controlled pressure drop during separation. The smaller controlled pressure drops help prevent foaming and thus separation efficiency is increased.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The accompanying drawings are incorporated into and form a part of the specification to illustrate several examples of the present inventions. These drawings together with the description serve to explain the principles of the inventions. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating preferred and alternative examples of how the inventions can be made and used and are not to be construed as limiting the inventions to only the illustrated and described examples. The various advantages and features of the present inventions will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of an example of an apparatus for practicing the improved method for separation and control of drilling fluids during under-balanced drilling of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a flow diagram of an improved method of the present invention for controlling the drilling fluid during under-balanced drilling;





FIG. 3

is a section view of an embodiment of a separator of the present invention for use in separating drilling fluids in an under-balanced drilling operation;





FIG. 4

is an alternate embodiment of an inlet for the separator of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5

is an alternate embodiment of an inlet for the separator of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 6A

is a top view of an alternate embodiment of an inlet for the separator of

FIG. 3

; and





FIG. 6B

is a side view of the alternate embodiment of the inlet of FIG.


6


A.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention will be described by referring to the drawings of methods showing various examples of how the inventions can be made and used. In these drawings, reference characters are used throughout the several views to indicate like or corresponding parts.




In

FIG. 1

, one embodiment of a drilling fluid separation and control system


10


for use in under-balanced drilling is shown. A selected operating fluid is used in an under-balanced well formation


26


as shown. The base drilling fluid


20


is relatively light and may consist of water-based mud or oil-based mud, but is more likely to be a water-based fluid or a lighter oil-based fluid, such as diesel fuel, crude oil or the like. The specific gravity of the base drilling fluid


20


can be altered by mixing an additive


22


, typically a control gas, into the drilling base fluid


20


in a mixer


24


, such as is known in the art, to create an operating fluid


18


for introduction into the well. The additive


22


may be nitrogen, carbon dioxide, a hydrocarbon gas or other gases as is known in the art. Various pumps, tubing, valving and control devices, such as pump


16


, may be used as is known in the art. The specific gravity of the operating fluid


18


is manipulated to maintain the down-hole well bore pressure DP at less than the reservoir pressure RP present in the formation


26


.




The operating fluid


18


is circulated down-hole where well formation materials, such as hydrocarbon oil


28


, hydrocarbon gas


30


, and well water


36


flow into the well and mix with the operating fluid


18


to create a returning drilling stream


40


. Depending on the formation, oil, gas and water may be produced independently or simultaneously. One of the purposes of the returning stream


40


is to carry cutting solids


32


back to the surface wellhead


34


. The mixture returning from down-hole, the returning drilling stream


40


, therefore may include formation oil


28


, formation gas


30


, base drilling fluid


20


, cutting solids


32


, additive gas


22


, and formation water


36


depending on the formation fluids produced by the well.




If the base drilling fluid


20


is oil based, the formation oil


28


will mix with and dilute the base oil used to initiate drilling. Similarly, if the base drilling fluid


20


is water based, the well water will mix with and dilute the water used originally to begin operations. This mixing is typically considered acceptable or desirable as the well water or native crude becomes the base drilling fluid. Lastly, the additive gases will mix with any hydrocarbon gas produced from the well.




The returning stream


40


, once at the surface, is under a wellhead pressure WP which can typically range from 25 psi to 3000 psi. When separation of the stream elements is desired, separation must be performed in a closed container or tank. Unfortunately, liquid-gas separation is less efficient when performed at elevated pressure levels. Basic hydrocarbon equilibrium phase behavior dictates that lowering the separation pressure reduces the hydrocarbon gas remaining in solution as a liquid. However, reducing the separation pressure, to release the gas from the liquid, increases the actual gas volume, thereby complicating gas handling and flow issues. The pressurized system presented allows the flexibility of varying the separation pressure to balance the opposing goals of releasing as much gas as possible from the returning stream


40


and avoiding releasing more gas than the system has the capacity to handle.




The returning stream


40


is directed into a first stage separation process


50


to undergo a first stage of separation at a first pressure P


1


. The pressure P


1


in the first state separation process


50


may vary greatly but is typically around 25 psi. The reduction in pressure, if desired, from the wellhead pressure WP to the first stage pressure P


1


allows for the more efficient separation of formation gas


30


from the returning stream


40


. Appropriate pressure reduction and control equipment, as is known in the art, may be employed in transfer of the returning stream


40


to the first stage


50


.




In the first stage


50


, formation gas


30


and additive gas


22


is removed as high-pressure gas


46


by gas removal means


52


. The first stage


50


may include utilization of a pressure vessel such as a three-phase vertical pressure tank.




One of the benefits of the first stage


50


is the catching and handling of the vast majority of the solids as soon as possible. A solids slurry


48


, including the cuttings


32


, is collected and removed from the returning stream


40


by solids removal means


54


. The solids slurry


48


may then be processed with conventional treatment equipment as desired, including shale shakers, desilters and desanders. If an oil-based drilling fluid is employed, the solids slurry


48


will comprise oil-based fluids and solids. If a water-based drilling fluid is used, the slurry will include water and solids. The conventional treatment systems are capable of separating the base drilling fluid, whether oil or water based, from the solids so that the salvageable base drilling fluid may be returned to the well for further operations.




The remaining fluids, the treated returning fluids


60


, which may include water


36


, drilling base fluid


20


, any formation gas


30


still remaining in the pressurized treated fluid


60


, and formation oil


28


, exit the first stage


50


by a fluid removal means


58


.




The treated returning fluid


60


now enters a second stage separation process


70


to undergo a second stage of separation at a second pressure P


2


. Typically pressure P


2


will be lower than pressure P


1


to enhance further gas separation from the liquid treated return fluid


60


. The pressure P


2


may vary greatly, can be atmospheric pressure, and is typically around 5 to 10 psi. The second stage


70


may also include use of a three-phase vertical pressure tank. Production gas


30


and remaining additive gas


22


are removed more completely during this stage.




The major benefit of a multi-stage separation allows for more convenient and efficient handling of the smaller volume of gas released at the high pressure P


1


combined with the more complete release of gas at the lower pressure P


2


. At the higher-pressure first stage


50


, gas is released in a relatively lesser volume than at the lower pressure stage


70


. At the lower pressure stage


70


, more gas is released from the liquid resulting in more complete gas-liquid separation.




Another advantage of a multi-stage separation method is the reduction or elimination of foaming which can occur when a returning stream bearing formation gas undergoes a drastic drop in pressure. A two-stage separation process allows selection of pressure P


1


and P


2


to provide a gradual step-down in pressure selected to allow removal of formation gas from the returning stream at each pressure level without foaming. When higher pressures or greater gas volumes are encountered, more than two stages of pressure may be utilized.




Low-pressure gas


72


is removed from the treated returning fluid


60


by gas removal means


74


. The low-pressure gas stream may be joined with the high-pressure gas


46


from the first stage


50


, as shown in

FIG. 1

, by methods known in the art.




Where the well is producing hydrocarbons and water, or where the selected base drilling fluid is water, the water, a heavy liquid, is collected and removed by a heavy liquid removal means


76


. The water may then be further treated as desired, such as for the removal of fine sediments, using conventional separation equipment and techniques


80


, such as with desilters, vacuum degassers, mud pits and pumps.




The hydrocarbon formation oil


28


is removed in the second stage


70


by an oil removal means


78


. If the oil is to be used as the base drilling fluid, it may be treated using conventional treatment methods and returned to use in the well. Where the well is producing only hydrocarbons, with virtually no water production, and the base fluid is oil based, it may not be necessary to remove two streams of fluid from the second stage


70


as shown in FIG.


1


. Instead, a single stream of oil-based drilling fluid may be removed via a single outlet means.




This two stage method separates the returning stream into components: a solids slurry, which may include oil or water; high and low pressure gas, which may include hydrocarbon and additive gas; liquid hydrocarbons, and water. The liquid hydrocarbons or water may serve as the base drilling fluid and be circulated to the well after appropriate treatment. The two stage method presents advantages over a single stage method utilizing a four-phase separator which are prone to filling with solids and require much larger tanks. The efficiency of such four-phase separators is compromised by having the additional complexity and dedicated volumes necessary for all four phases.




The high and low-pressure gases


46


and


72


are measured by gas testing means


84


to determine at least the flow rate of formation gas


30


produced form the well. Other data, such as the pressure and temperature of the gas stream, the composition of the gas, or the produced gas percentage and specific gravity, may also be measured. It is understood that the high and low-pressure gases


46


and


72


may be measured separately or that the gases may be combined through appropriate methods and measured into a single stream of gas. The gas may then be stored, flared, directed to a pipeline or otherwise handled.




Similarly, the formation hydrocarbon oil


28


is measured by oil testing means


94


to determine at least the flow rate produced from the formation. Other data such as the specific gravity, volume or percent volume of the liquid, and the pressure and temperature of the liquid stream, may be measured as desired. The oil is then directed to conventional storage tanks or otherwise handled as explained above.




The solids slurry, and the liquids recovered from the slurry, may also be measured by testing means


96


for flow rate, pressure, temperature, solid types and percentages of each type. Lastly, any existing heavy liquids retrieved from the second stage


70


may be tested by testing means


98


for flow rate and other data.




The recovered drilling base fluid


20


, which may be heavy water based fluids or light oil based fluids, is circulated back into the well as shown. The drilling base fluid


20


is passed through the mixer


24


where a volume of additive


22


may augment the fluid as needed to achieve a selected operating fluid specific gravity. The volume of additive


22


needed to achieve the required specific gravity is determined, at least in part, from the measured volume of formation gas and formation oil which was produced from the formation and separated using the described two-stage method. That is, after determining the flow rates, temperatures, pressures and other data, of formation hydrocarbons and water which became mixed with the operating fluid, the measured data can be used in conjunction to calculate the specific gravity needed for the operating fluid to maintain well stability in the under-balanced conditions. Thereafter, the required amount of additive may be determined and mixed into the base drilling fluid. The system


10


offers a continuous separation of components, continuous measurements of those components, and continuous calculations of needed additives to be mixed into the base drilling fluid.




The fluid separation and control system


10


is shown in simplified form and it is understood that the system may include further control devices such as tubing, valves, pumps, compressors, electrical control and signal devices and the like at any step of the process. It is further understood that the separation system may include three or more stages with a pressure step-down at each stage to further enhance gas removal and to help prevent foaming. The embodiment above may utilize two three-phase separator vessels or combinations of other known separator units to extract the gas, oil, drilling base fluids, water and cuttings, and further, that the order of the separation is not limited by the one preferred embodiment described above. Further, at any or each stage, further separation steps may be taken, such as the separation of heavy and light liquids during the first stage from the returning stream.





FIG. 2

shows a separation and control method for under-balanced drilling. A returning stream is removed from the well in step A. The returning stream may include base drilling fluid, additives, cuttings, formation gas, formation oil and water. Since the well is being drilled in an under-balanced condition, oil and gas from the subterranean well formation will mix with the operating fluid during operations. The returning stream will reach the surface wellhead under pressure. The returning stream may be removed from the well using pumps, valving and other equipment and methods known in the art.




In step B, formation oil and gas, water, additives and solids are separated from the returning fluid. The appearance of each of these components depends on the well production and selected additives and base drilling fluid. This step may be accomplished by the two-stage process explained herein. Further methods of conventional separation may be used as well, such as shale shakers, desilters, vacuum degassers, mud pits, atmospheric vessels and the like.




In step C, all returning materials are measured to determine their quantities. Other measurements and data may be extracted as well. Based at least in part on those quantitative measurements, in step D, quantities of additives for the base drilling fluid are determined. The measurement of the quantities of hydrocarbon materials produced from the well formation can be used to determine the required fluid specific gravity necessary to maintain and control under-balanced drilling. Other measurements, such as down-hole pressure and temperature, wellhead pressure and temperature, the pressures and temperatures of the separated components, the specific gravities and percentage compositions of each of the components, and the like may also be used to help determine the quantities of additives to be added to the drilling fluid and the rates of injection of the additive. In step E, the determined quantities of additives are added to the base drilling fluid to achieve a selected operating fluid density. And in step F, the operating fluid is returned to the well.





FIG. 3

shows in detail one embodiment of a three-phase separator


100


for processing the returning stream


40


from an under-balanced drilling operation that may be used in the first stage separation process


50


. The separator


100


comprises a vertical pressure vessel having an interior chamber


102


which is divided into a solids slurry section


104


, a liquids section


106


, and a gases section


108


. The vessel


100


receives returning stream


40


through inlet


110


. The returning stream


40


may, depending on the condition of the well formation and selected base drilling fluid, include formation oil, formation gas, water, base drilling fluids and cuttings, and is returned under pressure. The pressure P


1


in the vessel chamber


102


may be selected over a wide range but is preferably around 25 psi to induce gas separation.




The inlet


110


may comprise a hydrocyclone assembly


112


as shown in FIG.


3


. Hydrocyclone inlet diverter assemblies are known in the art and widely used as desanders and desilters, and may be purchased from various supply companies. The hydrocyclone assembly


112


is used in a unique fashion in the vessel


100


as shown. The assembly


112


, mounted to receive the returning fluid through an opening, acts as an inlet diverter. The assembly


112


is shown mounted in the interior chamber


102


, but may alternately be placed exterior to the pressure vessel


100


, as is known in the art. The hydrocyclone assembly diverts the incoming returning stream


40


into a vortex in which centrifugal forces separate the gases


30


, which exit through a top opening


114


of the assembly


112


, from the solids and liquids which exit through a bottom opening


116


of the assembly


112


. A vortex breaker


120


, such as is known in the art, is designed to reduce or eliminate the vortex formed by the hydrocyclone and prevent the gases from reaching the liquids section


106


. The hydrocyclone extends between the gases section


108


and the liquids section


106


of the interior chamber


102


so that the gases and solid-liquid mixtures are separated upon exiting the inlet


110


.




The hydrocyclone assembly may be replaced with a tangential vessel assembly


90


shown in

FIG. 4

, a tangential diverter assembly


92


shown in

FIG. 5

, or a vortex tube cluster assembly


95


shown in

FIGS. 6A and B

. Each of these assemblies are known in the art; the vortex tube cluster being available from Porta-test, for example. For pressure drop reasons, multiple parallel inlet diverters may be used.




Again referring primarily to

FIG. 3

, the gases


30


are contained in the gases section


108


of the interior chamber


102


. An optional mist extractor


124


, such as known in the art and available commercially from Burgess Manning, Peerless and other suppliers, may be employed to further separate any fine liquid droplets from the gases. A top chamber opening


126


provides an exit for the gases


30


. Appropriate control and pressure valves


130


may be employed to control the exit of the gases from the chamber


102


. Additionally, a relief valve system


128


may be provided as shown.




Solids handling and removal is of high importance. The bottom head


140


is preferably cone shaped for an enhancement in solids separation over more common ellipsoidal, flanged and dished, or spherical heads. A solids slurry


48


, formed of the solids and either heavy liquids or light liquids of the returning stream


40


, depending on the constituents of the returning stream, collects at the solids slurry section


104


at the bottom of the chamber


102


due to gravity. The solids slurry


48


is agitated or fluidized to enhance movement of the solids


32


towards and through a solids exit


144


in the bottom of the vessel


100


. The slurry


48


movement is enhanced by a sparging line, a sparging ring, a vortex generator, an eductor, dynamic mixer sand pan or other agitating means or a combination thereof.




Shown in

FIG. 3

are dual sparging rings


148


which act to fluidize and agitate the solids as they move through the bottom of the chamber


102


. The appropriate valving


162


and flush fluid supply


164


is provided. Vortex generators are available commercially from Merpro, among others.




Appropriate valving


150


and, if desired, a slurry pump


152


are provided to handle the solids as they exit the vessel


100


. The solids slurry


48


may then be moved to a conventional handling system if desired. The solids may be measured and quantified upon leaving the vessel.




The liquids section


106


of the chamber


102


contains the returning fluids, which separate by gravity from the solids


32


and gases


30


. The returning fluids may include the water, formation oil


28


and drilling base fluid


20


of the returning stream


40


, and may also include any gases which remain in the liquid. In the preferred embodiment a liquid outlet


156


is contained in the side wall


158


of the chamber


102


. Appropriate valving


159


, pumps


160


and the like, known in the art, remove the treated liquid


60


from the chamber


102


. Level control devices, such as level control device


161


, may be employed as needed. Alternately, the chamber


102


may be provided with multiple liquid outlets vertically spaced to remove light hydrocarbon liquids and heavy drilling fluids, as is known in the art.




The treated liquids, upon leaving the vessel, are preferably removed to a second stage separation process. The second stage may include a second three-phase vertical pressure vessel of similar construction which operates at a lower pressure. The second stage vessel may separate the remaining liquid into gas, light liquids and heavy liquids, as desired, and may operate at a pressure different than that of the vessel


100


. The embodiments shown and described above are only exemplary. Many details are often found in the art such as: “Surface Production Operations,” Arnold and Stewart. Therefore many such details are neither shown nor described. It is not claimed that all of the details, parts, steps or elements described and shown were invented herein. Even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present inventions have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and functions of the inventions, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of the parts within the principles of the inventions to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms used in the attached claims.




The restrictive description and drawings of the specific examples above do not point out what an infringement of this patent would be, but are to provide at least one explanation of how to make and use the inventions. The limits of the inventions and the bounds of the patent protection are measured by and defined in the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of separating fluids present in a hydrocarbon well in an under-balanced drilling operation wherein operating fluid circulating through the well during drilling is mixed with well materials flowing into the well from the well formation and is mixed with solids from the drilling operation and wherein a returning stream of mixed fluids and solids flowing out of the well is at an elevated pressure, comprising the steps of:lowering the pressure of the returning stream to a first pressure and removing well materials from the returning stream at the first pressure thereby creating a treated returning stream; thereafter lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure; and raising the pressure of the operating fluid and returning the operating fluid to the well.
  • 2. A method as in claim 1 further comprising forming a moving solids slurry, agitating the slurry and removing the solids from the returning stream at the first pressure.
  • 3. A method as in claim 2 wherein the well materials flowing into the well from the well formation comprise hydrocarbon gas and hydrocarbon oil.
  • 4. A method as in claim 3 wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the returning stream to a first pressure and removing well materials from the returning stream at the first pressure further comprises separating at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas from the returning stream.
  • 5. A method as in claim 4 wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas from the treated returning stream.
  • 6. A method as in claim 5 wherein the solids slurry comprises hydrocarbon oil and solids.
  • 7. A method as in claim 5 wherein the operating fluid comprises an oil-based operating fluid and wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating operating fluid from the treated returning stream.
  • 8. A method as in claim 6 further comprising treating the solids slurry to separate the solids and the hydrocarbon oil.
  • 9. A method as in claim 7 wherein the operating fluid comprises a water-based operating fluid and wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating operating fluid from the treated returning stream.
  • 10. A method as in claim 9 wherein the solids slurry comprises water and solids.
  • 11. A method as in claim 10 further comprising treating the solids slurry to separate the solids and the water.
  • 12. A method as in claim 10 wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating the hydrocarbon oil from the treated returning stream.
  • 13. A method as in claim 7 wherein the well materials flowing into the well from the well formation comprise hydrocarbon gas, hydrocarbon oil and water.
  • 14. A method as in claim 13 wherein the solids slurry comprises water and solids.
  • 15. A method as in claim 14 wherein the operating fluid comprises water-based operating fluid and wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating operating fluid from the treated returning stream.
  • 16. A method as in claim 15 wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating hydrocarbon oil from the treated returning stream.
  • 17. A method as in claim 15 further comprising treating the solids slurry to separate the solids and the water.
  • 18. A method as in claim 14 wherein the operating fluid comprises oil-based operating fluid and wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating operating fluid from the treated returning stream.
  • 19. A method as in claim 18 wherein the step of lowering the pressure of the treated returning stream to a second pressure and removing additional well materials from the treated returning stream at the second pressure further comprises separating water from the treated returning stream.
  • 20. A method as in claim 1 further comprising mixing an additive with the operating fluid prior to returning the operating fluid to the well.
  • 21. A method as in claim 20 wherein the additive is an additive gas.
  • 22. A method as in claim 20 wherein the additive gas is nitrogen.
  • 23. A method as in claim 1 wherein the operating fluid is a water based drilling mud.
  • 24. A method as in claim 1 wherein the operating fluid is a hydrocarbon liquid.
  • 25. A method as in claim 1 wherein the well materials removed from the returning stream include hydrocarbon gas.
  • 26. A method as in claim 1 wherein the well materials removed from the treated returning stream include hydrocarbon liquid.
  • 27. A method as in claim 1 wherein the gas removed from the returning stream and treated returning stream include hydrocarbon gas.
  • 28. A method of separating fluids present in a hydrocarbon well in an under-balanced drilling operation wherein drilling fluid circulating through the well during drilling is mixed with hydrocarbon well materials flowing into the well from the well formation and is mixed with solid cuttings from the drilling operation and wherein a returning stream of mixed fluids and solids flowing out of the well is at an elevated pressure, comprising the steps of:lowering the pressure of the drilling fluid; thereafter removing the hydrocarbon well materials from the drilling fluid; and raising the pressure of the drilling fluid and returning the drilling fluid to the well.
  • 29. A method as in claim 28 wherein the step of removing the hydrocarbon materials from the drilling fluid is accomplished using at least two sequential separators.
  • 30. A method as in claim 28 wherein the step of removing the hydrocarbon materials from the drilling fluid is accomplished using at least two sequential separators whereinthere is a pressure drop between at least two sequential separators.
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
5300222 Broussard, Sr. Apr 1994
5492622 Broussard Feb 1996
5928519 Homan Jul 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2 110 109 Jun 1983 GB
2 332 632 Jun 1999 GB
2 336 118 Oct 1999 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
Ken Arnold, et al., “Surface Production Operations vol. 1, ” Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas 1986.
Bruce Thistle, et al., “Horizontal Drilling of a Low Pressure Fractured Shale Reservoir With Crude Oil and Nitrogen, ” Paper 93-1103, CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference, Apr. 1993.
Dale Eresman, “Underbalanced [sic] Drilling —A Regulatory Perspective, ” Paper No. 93-306, CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference, Apr. 1993.
Pat Deis, et al., “Infill Drilling in the Mississippian Midale Beds of the Weyburn Field Using Underbalanced Horizontal Drilling techniques, ” Paper No. 93-1105, CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference, Apr. 1993.
Dale Eresman, “Underbalanced drilling guidelines improve safety, efficiency, ” Oil & Gas Journal, Feb. 28, 1994.
Robert R. Teichrob, “Low-pressure reservoir drilled with air/N2 in a closed system, ” Oil and Gas Journal, Mar. 21, 1994.
EUB Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Interim Directive ID 94-3, “Underbalanced Drilling, ” Jul. 18, 1994.
Fred Curtis, et al., “Underbalanced Drilling Operations —Correct Operating Procedures Using a Closed Surface Control System to Drill for Oil and Gas, ” Paper No. 95-106, CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference, Apr. 1995.
B. Lunan, “Underbalance Drilling —Surface Control Systems, ” The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Sep. 1995, vol. 34, No. 7.
J.Adam et al., “Underbalanced coiled tubing sidetrack successful, ” Oil & Gas Journal, Dec. 18, 1995.
D. Brant Bennion, “Underbalanced operations offer pluses and minuses, ” Oil & Gas Journal, Jan. 1, 1996.
EUB Alberta Energy and Utilities Board General Bulletin GB 96-17, “Sour Underbalanced Drilling Operations With Emergency Planning Zones (EPS'S) Encompassing Residents, ” Dec. 20, 1996.
J. Saponja, “Challenges with Jointed Pipe Underbalanced Operations, ” SPE 37066, Society of Petroleum Engineeers, Inc., 1996.
Robert L. Cuthbertson, et al., “New Surface Equipment For Underbalanced Drilling, ” Hart's Petroleum Engineer International, Mar. 1997.
John Vozniak, et al., “Field Results Document Underbalanced Drilling Success, ” Hart's Petroleum Engineer International, Apr. 1997.
John P. Vozniak, et al., “Underbalanced Drilling Benefits Now Available Offshore, ” Hart's Petroleum Engineer International, May 1997.
D. Nessa, et al., “Underbalanced drilling system could revive field developments —Part 1, ” World Oil, Jul. 1997.
D. Nessa, et al., “Underbalanced drilling system could revive field developments —Part 2, ” World Oil Oct. 1997.
D. Nessa, et al., “Recent North Sea Successes Build Confidence, ” Hart's Petroleum Engineer International, Sep. 1998.
Signa Engineering Corp., “UnderBalanced Operations Training and Reference Manual, ” Serial No. 0030, Dec. 1998.
Halliburton, Shell U.K. Exploration and Production Galleon Field; United Kingdom Underbalanced Capabilities, Apr. 6, 1999.
Maurer Engineering Inc. Manual Releases, “Underbalanced Drilling Manual, ” http://techweb.duncan.halnet.com/software/maurer/ubdrillm/ubddrillm.htm, Apr. 28, 1999.
Gas Research Institute, “Underbalanced Drilling Manual, ” GRI Reference No. GRI-97/0236.
Northland Energy Services, “Portfolio of Services & Equiupment”.
Northland Energy Corporation, Underbalanced Drilling Services.
AP Energy Business Publications Pte Ltd., “Getting more for your money, ” PetroMin.
Richard Mozley Limited, “The ultimate in separation technology...new high capacity large-diameter hydrocyclones”.