The present invention relates to methods of extracting an enhanced feedstock for distillation from pyrolysis oil and, more specifically, it relates to methods for performing an initial separation which establishes a lighter fraction and a heavier fraction. The lighter fraction is subjected to plate distillation and the heavier fraction is subjected to the removal of sulfur and nitrogen compounds therefrom to facilitate the use of the heavier fraction as heavy fuel oil. A preferred starting material is obtained from vehicular tires.
It has been known to subject rubber, such as scrap tires, to pyrolysis with the process producing a solid fraction such as carbon black, a liquid hydrocarbon and a gas. The liquid hydrocarbon may have potential as a fuel oil. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,833,485; 6,835,861; and 7,341,646.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,673,236 discloses the reduction of sulfur in petroleum middle distillates through catalytic oxidation in which vanadium is present. There is no disclosure of pyrolysis oil. Ethanol is present and is said to have a portion oxidized to form peracetic acid which is said to contribute to further oxidation. The final separation is specific for the alcohol MeOH and EtOH.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,495 discloses sulfur reduction in a hydrocarbon stream employing a catalytic distillation reactor and a hydrodesulfurization catalyst. A low-mercaptan product is said to be produced.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,983,278 discloses a two temperature pyrolysis method which employs oil recycling. It discloses creation of a light oil, heavy oil and solid residue in a two temperature process.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,292 discloses distillation of a crude oil into a number of fractions followed by catalytically cracking a gas oil fraction to form propane and other fractions.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,293,952 discloses a pyrolysis process where a basic metal oxide catalyst is employed and a resultant pyrolysis product is said to be high in alcohol content.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,118 discloses catalytic distillation technologies employed in sulfur reduction in naphtha streams. It employs a distillation column reactor to process petroleum streams containing organic sulfur and hydrogen which are contacted in the presence of hydrodesulfurization catalytic distillation structure.
It has generally been recognized that tire-derived pyrolysis oil contains valuable terpene and other unsaturates as well as mercaptans and other sulfur containing compounds. Attempts to isolate fractions containing these compounds in a commercially viable fraction have not been successful.
Pyrolysis-derived oil, in particular that derived from pyrolysis of a polymer, is a complex mixture of saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons and includes polar compounds containing sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen. Depending upon the polymer, it could contain halogenated compounds as well. These oils are often sold as a low-grade fuel at a low return. Due to a moderate sulfur content of these oils, they are generally used in less environmentally sensitive operations or, those that scrub their emission to remove sulfur. The petrochemical industry generally uses hydrodesulfurization using a metal catalyst and hydrogen gas to convert organosulfur compounds to hydrogen sulfide plus saturated hydrocarbon by the following reaction. RSH+H2→R+H2S where R is a hydrocarbon. The hydrogen sulfide is converted to elemental sulfur or sulfate. This process requires the use of hydrogen gas under pressure and is typically economically practical only on a large scale.
It is generally recognized that tire-derived pyrolysis oil contains valuable terpene and other unsaturates as well as mercaptans and other sulfur-containing compounds. However, attempts to isolate fractions containing these compounds have not yielded commercially valuable fractions. This is due to many issues from the complex nature of tire-derived pyrolysis oil. Attempts at direct distillation of the pyrolysis oils yield complex mixtures of compounds and distillate instability during distillation. Temperature variation in the heating vessel causes the fractions to have broad boiling point ranges. More significantly, pyrolysis oils yield reactive compound that, at high wall temperatures required by standard distillation, will react or crack during distillation causing foaming and difficulty in controlling temperature, pressure, and separation. M. Stanciulescu and M. Ikura (Limonene Ethers from Tire Pyrolysis Oil Part 1: Batch Experiments., J. Anal. Applies Pyrolysis 75, pp 217-225, 2006.) noted that limonene co-eluted with naphtha and proposed to react the limonene with methanol to shift its boiling point in order to separate it from the oil. They would then have to back react the ester to recover limonene. Roy, et. al. (Production of dl-limonene by vacuum pyrolysis of used tires, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 57 pp, 91-107, 2001.) found that pyrolytic breakdown products of limonene plus thiophene and other sulfur compounds co-eluted with limonene and made clean separation of limonene difficult. This again, shows the difficulty in isolating limonene from pyrolysis oil.
There remains, therefore, a real and substantial need for methods of treating pyrolysis oil to effect separation of commercially desirable fractions from fractions suitable for use as fuel oil.
The present invention has provided a solution to the shortcomings of the hereinbefore discussed prior art by providing effective methods for a processing pyrolysis vapor to effect separation of commercially desired fractions from heavier fractions suitable for use as fuel oil. More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, a first phase separation of the pyrolysis gas results in a lighter fraction and a heavier fraction. This is followed by a second phase subjecting the lighter fraction to plate distillation to separate the commercially desirable products. The heavier fraction in a third phase is subjected to oxidative desulfurization with nitrogen containing organic compounds being removed with the desufurization process are employed to produce an effective fuel oil product. A preferred initial separation of the pyrolysis oil involves thin film distillation as this effectively and economically produces the desired first stage of separation. Certain preferred parameters with respect to the plate distillation process as preferred features are disclosed.
Depending upon the specific objectives of a particular use, combinations of the three phase method employing less than all three, may be advantageously employed.
In another embodiment, the thin film distillation is followed by the compound distillation without employing the desulfurization step.
In a further embodiment, the product of the thin film distillation is subjected to the oxidative catalytic desulfurization without employing the plate distillation process.
It is an object of the present invention to provide efficient and effective methods for separating pyrolysis oil into (a) fractions which have enhanced marketability and (b) a utilitarian fraction which provides a marketable fuel product.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide such methods which can be employed on a small and moderate scale as well as on a very large scale.
It is a further object of the present invention to make efficient use of thin film distillation.
It is an object of the present invention to effect separation of pyrolysis oil into a commercially viable enhanced feedstock for distillation and to provide a heavy fraction with a more acceptable flashpoint and fewer highly volatile compounds than the pyrolysis oil taken as a whole.
It is a further object of present invention through thin film distillation to expose the pyrolysis oil to a substantially lower temperature and for a shorter time than required for bulk distillation and achieve the desired separation without encountering undesired cracking and coking reactions.
A further object of the invention to provide methods of catalytic oxidative reduction of sulfur content and nitrogen content.
These and other objects of the invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the invention on reference to the illustrations appended hereto.
Referring again to
It is an initial separation which produces (a) a light fraction which contains most of the commercially valuable compounds including, but not limited to, terpenes, mercaptans and cyclohexenes and (b) a heavy fraction.
In Phase II, the lighter fraction received from Phase I employs a plate distillation system with a split reflux that recovers from the light fraction the commercially valuable components of the pyrolysis oil.
Phase III receives the fuel oil fraction and subjects it to catalytic oxidation to reduce the sulfur and nitrogen contained in the heavy phase. A preferred catalyst employs molybdenum and aluminum with the preferred catalyst being a mixture of molybdenum trioxide and aluminum oxide. It is preferred to have the mixture on a weight to weight basis having a ratio between 0.5:1 weight to about 1:0.5 weight with the most preferring ratio of molybdenum trioxide to aluminum oxide being about 1:1.
Referring to
An advantage of thin film distillation is that the thin film of oil heats quickly and evenly and breaks the interactions between the lighter and heavier compounds without cracking or coking reactions. This is why it is preferable to use a thin film distillation to make an enhanced feedstock without destroying the integrity of the heavy or light fraction of the oil.
The separated commercially valuable component fraction typically consists of about 20 to 35 weight percent of the starting pyrolysis oil with the heavy fraction consisting of about 65 to 80 weight percent of the starting pyrolysis oil.
An example of Phase II will be considered. The feed material is the lighter fraction emerging from the Phase I thin film distillation.
The system is set initially to a range of 100-400 torr with a preferred setting of about 300 torr vacuum for collection of lower fraction which is collected from approximately 20° C. to 25° C. until the distillate reaches about 134° C. and 145° C., more preferred between 139° C. and 141° C. This lower fraction can be split into several temperature cuts. An example is as shown in TABLE 1.
The described cuts consist on several low boiling point highly volatile solvent chemicals. These include, but are not limited to, Xylene, Toluene, and Styrene making the individual, as well as the combined solution(s), extremely valuable in the industrial market.
After collection of fractions up to 141° C. at the preferred vacuum of 300 torr, the temperature is allowed to cool to room temperature and the vacuum is increased to a range of 100-300 torr with a preferred setting of 150 torr. A cut is made at 115° C.-125° C., more preferably between 1.19° C. and 123° C. at the preferred vacuum and is either added to the prior lower cut or kept separate as a lower volatile solvent solution. The next split is collected by continuing to apply heat until 124° C. to 127° C., more preferably between 125° C. to 126° C. At the preferred vacuum, this cut is going to contain the bulk of the limonene and p-Cymene and is collected as a single fraction and is kept separate. After that, a single fraction up to 132° C. is collected as a clearing cut to ensure that all of the high value material is extracted in this process. A generalized description at preferred conditions, for the splits are as shown in TABLE 2.
The resulting fraction can be combined or maintained separately to provide fractions containing high volatile solvent chemicals and/or essential oils at various purities.
After introduction of the heavy fraction through port 30, a strong oxidizer, such as hydrogen peroxide or other oxidant, is slowly added through port 28 and mixer 36 serves to agitate the material. Mixing is preferably occurring at about 50° C. to 75° C. for about 1.5 to 3 hours. After completion of the reaction, the mixture is pumped or gravity fed through outlet port 44 which can transport solid aqueous and organic material delivering the same to oil/water separator 46 which may advantageously be a centrifugal separator. The processed fraction which will have had sulfur and nitrogen removed emerges from outlet 50, where the liquid layers are separated and the aqueous layer containing most of the spent oxidizer and catalyst are separated from the organic layer for regeneration and reuse.
The catalyst which is preferably a mixture of molybdenum trioxide and aluminum oxide, preferably, is present in an amount of 0.5:1 wt:wt to 1:0.5 wt:wt and, most preferably, a 1:1 wt:wt mixture of the two oxides. The catalyst is added to the reaction vessel 40 with a strong oxidizer which may be approximately 15 percent hydrogen peroxide V/V along with the sulfur and nitrogen containing fraction. The agitator 36 maintains the mixture in suspension at 700 revolutions per minute level or as adequate to create an even mixing of reactants. The mixture is reacted within a mild temperature range of about 50° C. to 75° C. and, preferably, about 55° C. to 65° C. by controlling the heating/cooling jacket 42. After a reaction period of about 1½ to 3 hours and, preferably, about ¾ of an hour to 1¾ hours, the mixture is delivered to the oil/water separator 46 where the liquid layers are separated from the spent oxidizer and catalysts are separated from the organic layer for regeneration and reuse.
It will be appreciated that the three phases disclosed herein may all be employed in the method as illustrated in
In
In connection with
The aluminum/molybdenum catalyst system used with the oxidizing reagent converts organo-sulfur compounds to sulfate converts the organic compounds containing nitrogen to nitrates and removes them from the oil.
Whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been described hereinbefore for purposes of illustration, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details may be made without departing from the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3702292 | Burich | Nov 1972 | A |
4983278 | Cha et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5779883 | Hearn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6444118 | Podrebarac et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6673236 | Stanciulescu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6833485 | Nichols et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835861 | Nichols et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7341646 | Nichols et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
8043495 | Podrebarac | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8293952 | Levin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20140305786 | Beaver et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Maria Stanciulescu, Limonene ethers from tire pyrolysis oil Part 1: Batch experiments, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2006, pp. 217-225, 75, Elsevier, Canada. |
Maria Stanciulescu, Limonene ethers from tire pyrolysis oil Part 2: Continuous flow experiments, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2006, pp. 76-84, 78, Elsevier, Canada. |
Roy, et al., Production of dl-limonene by vacuum pyrolysis of used tires, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2001, pp. 91-107. |