Patent Grant
7631691
This invention relates to methods of treating a subterranean formation to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons. More particularly, this invention relates to such methods that include the steps of providing wells in the formation, establishing fractures in the formation, such that each fracture intersects at least one of the wells, placing electrically conductive material in the fractures, and generating electric current through the fractures and through the electrically conductive material such that sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within the electrically conductive material to pyrolyze organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
A Table of References is provided herein, immediately preceding the claims. All REF. numbers referred to herein are identified in the Table of References.
Oil shales, source rocks, and other organic-rich rocks contain kerogen, a solid hydrocarbon precursor that will convert to producible oil and gas upon heating. Production of oil and gas from kerogen-containing rocks presents two primary problems. First, the solid kerogen must be converted to oil and gas that will flow through the rock. When kerogen is heated, it undergoes pyrolysis, chemical reactions that break bonds and form smaller molecules like oil and gas. The second problem with producing hydrocarbons from oil shales and other organic-rich rocks is that these rocks typically have very low permeability. By heating the rock and transforming the kerogen to oil and gas, the permeability is increased.
Several technologies have been proposed for attempting to produce oil and gas from kerogen-containing rocks.
Near-surface oil shales have been mined and retorted at the surface for over a century. In 1862, James Young began processing Scottish oil shales, and that industry lasted for about 100 years. Commercial oil shale retorting has also been conducted in other countries such as Australia, Brazil, China, Estonia, France, Russia, South Africa, Spain, and Sweden. However, the practice has been mostly discontinued in recent years because it proved to be uneconomic or because of environmental constraints on spent shale disposal (REF. 26). Further, surface retorting requires mining of the oil shale, which limits application to shallow formations.
Techniques for in situ retorting of oil shale were developed and pilot tested with the Green River oil shale in the United States. In situ processing offers advantages because it reduces costs associated with material handling and disposal of spent shale. For the in situ pilots, the oil shale was first rubblized and then combustion was carried out by air injection. A rubble bed with substantially uniform fragment size and substantially uniform distribution of void volume was a key success factor in combustion sweep efficiency. Fragment size was of the order of several inches.
Two modified in situ pilots were performed by Occidental and Rio Blanco (REF. 1; REF. 21). A portion of the oil shale was mined out to create a void volume, and then the remaining oil shale was rubblized with explosives. Air was injected at the top of the rubble chamber, the oil shale was ignited, and the combustion front moved down. Retorted oil ahead of the front drained to the bottom and was collected there.
In another pilot, the “true” in situ GEOKINETICS process produced a rubblized volume with carefully designed explosive placement that lifted a 12-meter overburden (REF. 23). Air was injected via wellbores at one end of the rubblized volume, and the combustion front moved horizontally. The oil shale was retorted ahead of the burn; oil drained to the bottom of the rubblized volume and to production wells at one end.
Results from these in situ combustion pilots indicated technical success, but the methods were not commercialized because they were deemed uneconomic. Oil shale rubblization and air compression were the primary cost drivers.
A few authors and inventors have proposed in situ combustion in fractured oil shales, but field tests, where performed, indicated a limited reach from the wellbore (REF. 10; REF. 11; REF. 17).
An in situ retort by thermal conduction from heated wellbores approach was invented by Ljungstrom in 1940 and pioneered by the Swedish Shale Oil Co. with a full scale plant that operated from 1944 into the 1950's (REF. 19; REF. 24). The process was applied to a permeable oil shale at depths of 6 to 24 m near Norrtorp, Sweden. The field was developed with hexagonal patterns, with six heater wells surrounding each vapor production well. Wells were 2.2 m apart. Electrical resistance heaters in wellbores provided heat for a period of five months, which raised the temperature at the production wells to about 400° C. Hydrocarbon vapor production began when the temperature reached 280° C. and continued beyond the heating period. The vapors condensed to a light oil product having a specific gravity of 0.87.
Van Meurs and others further developed the approach of conductive heating from wellbores (REF. 24). They patented a process to apply the approach to impermeable oil shales with heater wells at 600° C. and well spacings greater than 6 m. They propose that the heat-injection wells may be heated either by electrical resistance heaters or by gas-fired combustion heaters. The inventors performed field tests in an outcropping oil shale formation with wells 6 to 12 m deep and 0.6 m apart. After three months, temperatures reached 300° C. throughout the test area. Oil yields were 90% of Fischer Assay. The inventors observed that permeability increased between the wellbores, and they suggest that it may be a result of horizontal fractures formed by the volume expansion of the kerogen to hydrocarbon reaction.
Because conductive heating is limited to distances of several meters, conductive heating from wellbores must be developed with very closely spaced wells. This limits economic application of the process to very shallow oil shales (low well costs) and/or very thick oil shales (higher yield per well).
Covell and others proposed retorting a rubblized bed of oil shale by gasification and combustion of an underlying coal seam (REF. 5). Their process named Total Resource Energy Extraction (TREE), called for upward convection of hot flue gases (727° C.) from the coal seam into the rubblized oil shale bed. Models predicted an operating time of 20 days, and an estimated oil yield of 89% of Fischer Assay. Large-scale experiments with injection of hot flue gases into beds of oil shale blocks showed considerable coking and cracking, which reduced oil recovery to 68% of Fischer Assay. As with the in situ oil shale retorts, the oil shale rubblization involved in this process limits it to shallow oil shales and is expensive.
Passey et al. describe a process to produce hydrocarbons from organic-rich rocks by carrying out in situ combustion of oil in an adjacent reservoir (REF. 16). The organic-rich rock is heated by thermal conduction from the high temperatures achieved in the adjacent reservoir. Upon heating to temperatures in excess of 250° C., the kerogen in the organic-rich rocks is transformed to oil and gas, which are then produced. The permeability of the organic-rich rock increases as a result of the kerogen transformation. This process is limited to organic-rich rocks that have an oil reservoir in an adjacent formation.
In an in situ retort by electromagnetic heating of the formation, electromagnetic energy passes through the formation, and the rock is heated by electrical resistance or by the absorption of dielectric energy. To our knowledge it has not been applied to oil shale, but field tests have been performed in heavy oil formations.
The technical capability of resistive heating within a subterranean formation has been demonstrated in a heavy-oil pilot test where “electric preheat” was used to flow electric current between two wells to lower viscosity and create communication channels between wells for follow-up with a steam flood (REF. 4). Resistive heating within a subterranean formation has been patented and applied commercially by running alternating current or radio frequency electrical energy between stacked conductive fractures or electrodes in the same well (REF. 14; REF. 6; REF. 15; REF. 12). REF. 7 includes a description of resistive heating within a subterranean formation by running alternating current between different wells. Others have described methods to create an effective electrode in a wellbore (REF. 20; REF. 8). REF. 27 describes a method by which electric current is flowed through a fracture connecting two wells to get electric flow started in the bulk of the surrounding formation; heating of the formation occurs primarily due to the bulk electrical resistance of the formation.
Resistive heating of the formation with low-frequency electromagnetic excitation is limited to temperatures below the in situ boiling point of water to maintain the current-carrying capacity of the rock. Therefore, it is not applicable to kerogen conversion where much higher temperatures are required for conversion on production timeframes.
High-frequency heating (radio or microwave frequency) offers the capability to bridge dry rock, so it may be used to heat to higher temperatures. A small-scale field experiment confirmed that high temperatures and kerogen conversion could be achieved (REF. 2). Penetration is limited to a few meters (REF. 25), so this process would require many wellbores and is unlikely to yield economic success.
In these methods that utilize an electrode to deliver electrical excitation directly to the formation, electrical energy passes through the formation and is converted to heat. One patent proposes thermal heating of a gas hydrate from an electrically conductive fracture proppant in only one well, with current flowing into the fracture and presumably to ground (REF. 9).
Even in view of currently available and proposed technologies, it would be advantageous to have improved methods of treating subterranean formations to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
Therefore, an object of this invention is to provide such improved methods. Other objects of this invention will be made apparent by the following description of the invention.
Methods of treating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter are provided. In one embodiment, a method according to this invention comprises the steps of: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture; and (d) passing electric current through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons. In one embodiment, said electrically conductive material comprises a proppant. In one embodiment, said electrically conductive material comprises a conductive cement. In one embodiment, one or more of said fractures intersects at least two of said wells. In one embodiment, said subterranean formation comprises oil shale. In one embodiment, said well is substantially vertical. In one embodiment, said well is substantially horizontal. In one embodiment, said fracture is substantially horizontal. In one embodiment, said fracture is substantially vertical. In one embodiment, said fracture is substantially longitudinal to the well from which it is established.
In one embodiment of this invention, a method of treating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter is provided wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive proppant material in said fracture; and (d) passing electric current through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive proppant material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive proppant material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter is provided wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) providing two or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least two of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture; and (d) passing electric current through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter is provided wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) providing two or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least two of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive proppant material in said fracture; and (d) passing electric current through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive proppant material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive proppant material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a heavy oil or tar sand subterranean formation containing hydrocarbons is provided wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture; and (d) passing electric current through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to reduce the viscosity of at least a portion of said hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter is provided wherein said method comprises: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture, wherein said electrically conductive material is comprised of a mixture of at least a first material and a second material; (d) placing two electrodes in contact with the electrically conductive material; and (e) applying a voltage across the two electrodes causing an electric current to pass through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a heavy oil or tar sand subterranean formation containing hydrocarbons is provided, wherein said method comprises: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture, wherein said electrically conductive material is comprised of a mixture of at least a first material and a second material; (d) placing two electrodes in contact with the electrically conductive material; and (e) applying a voltage across the two electrodes causing an electric current to pass through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to reduce the viscosity of at least a portion of said hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of producing hydrocarbon fluids is provided, wherein the method comprises heating a subterranean formation that contains solid organic matter, thereby pyrolyzing the solid organic matter to form producible hydrocarbons and producing at least a portion of the producible hydrocarbons to the surface, wherein the heating comprises: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture, wherein said electrically conductive material is comprised of a mixture of at least a first material and a second material; (d) placing two electrodes in contact with the electrically conductive material; and (e) applying a voltage across the two electrodes causing an electric current to pass through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of producing hydrocarbon fluids is provided, wherein the method comprises heating a subterranean heavy oil or tar sand formation containing hydrocarbons, thereby reducing the hydrocarbons viscosity, and producing at least a portion of the reduced viscosity hydrocarbons to the surface, wherein the heating comprises: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture, wherein said electrically conductive material is comprised of a mixture of at least a first material and a second material; (d) placing two electrodes in contact with the electrically conductive material; and (e) applying a voltage across the two electrodes causing an electric current to pass through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to reduce the viscosity of at least a portion of said hydrocarbons, thereby forming reduced viscosity hydrocarbons.
In another embodiment, a method of producing hydrocarbon fluids is provided, wherein the method comprises heating a subterranean formation that contains organic matter comprised of solid organic matter, heavy oil, tar sands, or combinations thereof, thereby pyrolyzing or reducing the viscosity of at least a portion of the organic matter, forming producible hydrocarbons and producing at least a portion of the producible hydrocarbons to the surface, wherein the heating comprises: (a) providing one or more wells that penetrate a treatment interval within the subterranean formation; (b) establishing at least one fracture from at least one of said wells, whereby said fracture intersects at least one of said wells; (c) placing electrically conductive material in said fracture, wherein said electrically conductive material is comprised of a mixture of at least a first material and a second material; (d) placing two electrodes in contact with the electrically conductive material; and (e) applying a voltage across the two electrodes causing an electric current to pass through said fracture such that said current passes through at least a portion of said electrically conductive material and sufficient heat is generated by electrical resistivity within said portion of said electrically conductive material to pyrolyze at least a portion of said solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons.
This invention uses an electrically conductive material as a resistive heater. Electrical current flows primarily through the resistive heater comprised of the electrically conductive material. Within the resistive heater, electrical energy is converted to thermal energy, and that energy is transported to the formation by thermal conduction.
Broadly, the invention is a process that generates hydrocarbons from organic-rich rocks (i.e., source rocks, oil shale). The process utilizes electric heating of the organic-rich rocks. An in situ electric heater is created by delivering electrically conductive material into a fracture in the organic matter containing formation in which the process is applied. In describing this invention, the term “hydraulic fracture” is used. However, this invention is not limited to use in hydraulic fractures. The invention is suitable for use in any fracture, created in any manner considered to be suitable by one skilled in the art. In one embodiment of this invention, as will be described along with the drawings, the electrically conductive material may comprise a proppant material; however, this invention is not limited thereto.
Any means of generating the voltage/current through the electrically conductive material in the fractures may be employed, as will be familiar to those skilled in the art. Although variable with organic-rich rock type, the amount of heating required to generate producible hydrocarbons, and the corresponding amount of electrical current required, can be estimated by methods familiar to those skilled in the art. Kinetic parameters for Green River oil shale, for example, indicate that for a heating rate of 100° C. (180° F.) per year, complete kerogen conversion will occur at a temperature of about 324° C. (615° F.). Fifty percent conversion will occur at a temperature of about 291° C. (555° F.). Oil shale near the fracture will be heated to conversion temperatures within months, but it is likely to require several years to attain thermal penetration depths required for generation of economic reserves.
During the thermal conversion process, oil shale permeability is likely to increase. This may be caused by the increased pore volume available for flow as solid kerogen is converted to liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons, or it may result from the formation of fractures as kerogen converts to hydrocarbons and undergoes a substantial volume increase within a confined system. If initial permeability is too low to allow release of the hydrocarbons, excess pore pressure will eventually cause fractures.
The generated hydrocarbons may be produced via the same wells by which the electric power is delivered to the conductive fracture, or additional wells may be used. Any method of producing the producible hydrocarbons may be used, as will be familiar to those skilled in the art.
The advantages of the present invention will be better understood by referring to the following detailed description and the attached drawings in which:
While the invention will be described in connection with its preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents which may be included within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, as defined by the appended claims.
Referring now to
Fractures into which conductive material is placed may be substantially vertical or substantially horizontal. Such a fracture may be, but is not required to be, substantially longitudinal to the well from which it is established.
Any suitable materials may be used as the electrically conducting fracture proppant. To be suitable, a candidate material preferably meets several criteria, as will be familiar to those skilled in the art. The electrical resistivity of the proppant bed under anticipated in situ stresses is preferably high enough to provide resistive heating while also being low enough to conduct the planned electric current from one well to another. The proppant material also preferably meets the usual criteria for fracture proppants: e.g., sufficient strength to hold the fracture open, and a low enough density to be pumped into the fracture. Economic application of the process may set an upper limit on acceptable proppant cost. Any suitable proppant material or electrically conductive material may be used, as will be familiar to those skilled in the art. Three suitable classes of proppant comprise (i) thinly metal-coated sands, (ii) composite metal/ceramic materials, and (iii) carbon based materials. A suitable class of non-proppant electrically conductive material comprises conductive cements. More specifically, green or black silicon carbide, boron carbide, or calcined petroleum coke may be used as a proppant. One skilled in the art has the ability to select a suitable proppant or non-proppant electrically conductive material for use in this invention. The electrically conductive material is not required to be homogeneous, but may comprise a mixture of two or more suitable electrically conductive materials. Further, the electrically conductive material may be comprised of a mixture of one electrically conductive material and one substantially non-electrically conductive material.
In some embodiments where the first material comprising the electrically conductive material is itself an electrically conductive material, the second material may be either electrically conductive or substantially non-electrically conductive. An electrically conductive second material may be chosen to aid in maintaining a dispersed electrical connection throughout a substantial portion of the entire fracture pack area. For example, the first material may be an electrically conductive substantially spherical proppant material and the second material may be an elongated electrically conductive material. The phrase elongated material is meant to refer to a material that has an average length that is at least 2.0 times greater than the materials average width. In alternative embodiments, an elongated material may have an average length that is at least 5.0, 10.0, or 15.0 times greater than the materials average width. Where the elongated material is also electrically conductive, the elongated material may function to help maintain a dispersed electricity flow through a large portion of the fracture pack by functioning as an electrical connection between individual electrically conductive proppants. Thus the electrically conductive elongated material may help in establishing and/or maintaining electricity flow through a greater portion of the mass of the electrically conductive proppant material comprising the fracture pack. The elongated material may also function to maintain the structural integrity of the electrically conductive fracture pack area. Heating and/or fluid flow within or near the fracture may produce forces that will tend to move portions of the fracture pack fill material. An elongated material, together with a substantially spherical proppant material will tend to form a composite fracture pack fill material that is more resistant to displacement than a spherical proppant material alone. The above-described displacement resistance of the composite fracture pack fill material is also applicable where the elongated material is substantially non-electrically conductive. The elongated material may preferably have a minimum flexibility so that the material will flex but not break during pumping and during heating operations. Exemplary elongated materials include fibers, wirelets, shavings, ductile platelets or combinations thereof. An electrically conductive elongated material may be comprised of metal.
The first material and second material of the composite fracture pack material may be delivered and packed in any selected proportion. In some embodiments employing a substantially spherical proppant material together with an elongated material, the elongated material length may be up to 30 times or more the proppant average grain size. In alternate embodiments, the elongated material length may be between 1 to 30 times, 2 to 20 times, or 10 to 15 times the average proppant grain size. In some embodiments employing a substantially spherical proppant material together with an elongated material, the elongated material may have an average width that is less than about 50 percent of the average grain size of the proppant material. In alternate embodiments, the elongated material may have an average width that is less than about 40, 35 or 30 percent of the average grain size of the proppant material. In some embodiments employing an elongated material as part of a composite fracture pack material, the width of the elongated material, or second material, may be less than about 125 percent of the average pore size of a fracture pack made up of only the first material (e.g., substantially spherical proppant material). In alternate embodiments, the width of the elongated material may be less than about 100, 95, or 90 percent of the average pore size of a fracture pack made up of only the first material. In some embodiments including an elongated material, the substantially spherical proppant material may comprise 60 to 99.9 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the substantially spherical proppant material may comprise 70 to 99, 75 to 99 or 80 to 99 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In some embodiments the elongated material may comprise 0.1 to 40 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the elongated material may comprise 0.5 to 30, 1.0 to 25 or 2.0 to 20 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass.
In some embodiments where the first material comprising the electrically conductive material is itself an electrically conductive material, the second material may be either an electrically conductive or substantially non-electrically conductive cement. Cement, by itself, may be essentially non-electrically conductive. However, electrically conductive materials, including for example graphite, may be added to cement to make the cement more electrically conductive. In the case where the second material is a cement, the cement material may function to maintain the structural integrity of the electrically conductive fracture pack area. As previously discussed, heating and/or fluid flow within or near the fracture may produce forces that will tend to move portions of the fracture pack fill material. A cement material, together with a substantially spherical proppant material will tend to form a composite fracture pack fill material that is more resistant to displacement than a spherical proppant material alone. Exemplary conductive cement materials include those previously discussed. Exemplary substantially non-electrically conductive cement materials include Portland cement, silica, clay-based cements, or combinations thereof.
The first material and second material of the composite fracture pack material may be delivered and packed in any selected proportion. In some embodiments employing a non-electrically conductive fracture pack material, the electrically conductive material may comprise 50 to 99.9 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the electrically conductive material may comprise 50 to 99, 60 to 99 or 70 to 99 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In some embodiments employing a non-electrically conductive fracture pack material, the non-electrically conductive material may comprise 0.1 to 50 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the non-electrically conductive material may comprise 0.1 to 40, 0.1 to 30 or 0.1 to 20 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In some embodiments employing a cement material as part of a composite fracture pack material, the volume of cement material, or second material, may be less than about 125 percent of the average porosity of a fracture pack made up of only the first material (e.g., substantially spherical proppant material). In alternate embodiments, the cement material may be less than about 100, 95, or 90 percent of the average porosity of a fracture pack made up of only the first material. In some embodiments employing a cement material and a substantially spherical proppant material, the substantially spherical proppant material may comprise 40 to 99.9 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the substantially spherical proppant material may comprise 50 to 99, 60 to 99 or 70 to 99 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In some embodiments employing a cement material as part of a composite fracture pack material, the cement material may comprise 1 to 50 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the cement material may comprise 1 to 40, 5 to 30 or 10 to 25 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In some embodiments employing a cement fracture pack material, the second material (e.g., electrically conductive propant material, calcined coke) may comprise 50 to 99.9 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass. In alternate embodiments, the second material may comprise 60 to 99, 70 to 99 or 80 to 99 weight percent of the composite fracture pack mass.
The composite fracture pack may be placed in the fracture as other fracture packs are generally completed, as is known in the art. For example, the first material and the second material may be mixed with an appropriate carrier fluid having sufficient viscosity to carry the mixture of materials at a chosen fracture volume and fracture packing flow rate. Methods useful in mixing and flowing cement for well casing operations and methods useful in mixing and accomplishing fracture packing operations, as are known in the art, may be used for accomplishing the above composite fracture packing methods.
A laboratory test was conducted and the test results show that this invention successfully transforms kerogen in a rock into producible hydrocarbons in the laboratory. Referring now to
The entire assembly was then placed in a pressure vessel (not shown in the FIGs.) with a glass liner that would collect any generated hydrocarbons. The pressure vessel was equipped with electrical feeds. The pressure vessel was evacuated and charged with Argon at 500 psi to provide a chemically inert atmosphere for the experiment. Electrical current in the range of 18 to 19 amps was applied between electrodes 35 and 37 for 5 hours. The thermocouple in core sample 30 measured a temperature of 268° C. after about 1 hour and thereafter tapered off to about 250° C. Using calculation techniques that are well known to those skilled in the art, the high temperature reached at the location of tray 36 was from about 350° C. to about 400° C.
After the experiment was completed and the core sample 30 had cooled to ambient temperature, the pressure vessel was opened and 0.15 ml of oil was recovered from the bottom of the glass liner within which the experiment was conducted. The core sample 30 was removed from the pressure vessel, and the resistance between electrodes 35 and 37 was again measured. This post-experiment resistance measurement was 49 ohms.
After the core sample 30 cooled to ambient temperature, it was removed from the pressure vessel and disassembled. The proxy proppant 38 was observed to be impregnated in several places with tar-like hydrocarbons or bitumen, which were generated from the oil shale during the experiment. A cross section was taken through a crack that developed in the core sample 30 because of thermal expansion during the experiment. A crescent shaped section of converted oil shale adjacent to the proxy proppant 38 was observed.
Although this invention is applicable to transforming solid organic matter into producible hydrocarbons in oil shale, this invention may also be applicable to heavy oil reservoirs, or tar sands. In these instances, the electrical heat supplied would serve to reduce hydrocarbon viscosity. Additionally, while the present invention has been described in terms of one or more preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that other modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the claims below.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/558,068, filed Nov. 22, 2005, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,331,385, entitled Methods of Treating a Subterranean Formation To Convert Organic Matter Into Producible Hydrocarbons, which is the National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/US2004/011508, filed Apr. 14, 2004, which claims the benefit of both U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/482,135 filed on Jun. 24, 2003 and 60/511,994 filed on Oct. 16, 2003. All of the above-referenced applications are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 363419 | Poetsch | May 1887 | A |
| 1342780 | Vedder | Jun 1920 | A |
| 1422204 | Hoover et al. | Jul 1922 | A |
| 1666488 | Crawshaw | Apr 1928 | A |
| 1701884 | Hogle | Feb 1929 | A |
| 1872906 | Doherty | Aug 1932 | A |
| 2033560 | Wells | Mar 1936 | A |
| 2033561 | Wells | Mar 1936 | A |
| 2634961 | Ljungstrom | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2732195 | Ljungstrom | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2777679 | Ljungstrom | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2780450 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2795279 | Sarapuu | Jun 1957 | A |
| 2812160 | West et al. | Nov 1957 | A |
| 2847071 | De Priester | Aug 1958 | A |
| 2887160 | De Priester et al. | May 1959 | A |
| 2895555 | De Priester | Jul 1959 | A |
| 2923535 | Ljungstrom | Feb 1960 | A |
| 2944803 | Hanson | Jul 1960 | A |
| 2952450 | Purre | Sep 1960 | A |
| 3004601 | Bodine | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3013609 | Brink | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3095031 | Eurenius et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
| 3106244 | Parker | Oct 1963 | A |
| 3109482 | O'Brien | Nov 1963 | A |
| 3127936 | Eurenius | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3137347 | Parker | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3149672 | Orkiszewski et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3180411 | Parker | Apr 1965 | A |
| 3183675 | Schroeder | May 1965 | A |
| 3194315 | Rogers | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3225829 | Chown et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3241611 | Dougan | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3241615 | Brandt et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3254721 | Smith et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3256935 | Nabor et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3267680 | Schlumberger | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3271962 | Dahms et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3284281 | Thomas | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3294167 | Vogel | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3295328 | Bishop | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3372550 | Schroeder | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3376403 | Mircea | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3400762 | Peacock et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3436919 | Shock et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3468376 | Slusser et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3500913 | Nordgren et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3501201 | Closmann et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3513914 | Vogel | May 1970 | A |
| 3528252 | Gail | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3559737 | Ralstin et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3599714 | Messman | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3602310 | Halbert | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3613785 | Closmann et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3620300 | Crowson | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3642066 | Gill | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3692111 | Breithaupt et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3729965 | Gartner | May 1973 | A |
| 3741306 | Papadopoulos | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3759329 | Ross | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3882937 | Robinson | May 1975 | A |
| 3943722 | Ross | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3950029 | Timmins | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3978920 | Bandyopadhyay | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4003432 | Paull et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4005750 | Shuck | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4030549 | Bouck | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4067390 | Camacho et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4071278 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4125159 | Vann | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4140180 | Bridges et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4239283 | Ridley | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4265310 | Britton et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4272127 | Hutchins | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4319635 | Jones | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4320801 | Rowland et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4358222 | Landau | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4368921 | Hutchins | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4372615 | Ricketts | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4397502 | Hines | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4401162 | Osborne | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4412585 | Bouck | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4457365 | Kasevich et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4473114 | Bell et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4474238 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4485869 | Sresty et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4487257 | Dauphine | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4487260 | Pittman et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4550779 | Zakiewicz | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4567945 | Segalman | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4589491 | Perkins | May 1986 | A |
| 4607488 | Karinthi et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4626665 | Fort | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4634315 | Owen et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4640352 | Vanmeurs et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4694907 | Stahl et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4704514 | Van Egmond et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4705108 | Little et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4747642 | Gash et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4754808 | Harmon et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4860544 | Krieg et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4886118 | Van Meurs et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4926941 | Glandt et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4974425 | Krieg et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5016709 | Combe et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5050386 | Krieg et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5255742 | Mikus | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5297626 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5305829 | Kumar | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5392854 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5411089 | Vinegar et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416257 | Peters | May 1995 | A |
| 5620049 | Gipson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5730550 | Andersland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5899269 | Wellington et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 6023554 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6148911 | Gipson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6581684 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6607036 | Ranson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6684644 | Mittricker et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6708758 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712136 | de Rouffignac et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722429 | de Rouffignac et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6742588 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745832 | Wellington et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6782947 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6796139 | Briley et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6854929 | Vinegar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858049 | Mittricker | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6880633 | Wellington et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887369 | Moulton et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896053 | Berchenko et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6913078 | Shahin et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918444 | Passey et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6923258 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6932155 | Vinegar et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6948562 | Wellington et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953087 | de Rouffignac et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6964300 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969123 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7011154 | Maher et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7032660 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036583 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7066254 | Vinegar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7073578 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077198 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077199 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7093655 | Atkinson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096942 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7096953 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104319 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7121342 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7225866 | Berchenko et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7331385 | Symington et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7357180 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7441603 | Kaminsky et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7516785 | Kaminsky | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7516787 | Kaminsky | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 20050269077 | Sandberg | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20070045265 | McKinzie, II | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144732 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209799 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246994 | Symington et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080087420 | Symington et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087421 | Kaminsky | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087426 | Kaminsky | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087427 | Symington et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080087428 | Symington et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080173443 | Symington et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207970 | Meurer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080230219 | Kaminsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271885 | Kaminsky | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283241 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080289819 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080290719 | Symington et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090050319 | Kaminsky et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 994694 | Aug 1976 | CA |
| 1288043 | Aug 1991 | CA |
| 0387846 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0866212 | Sep 1998 | FR |
| 855408 | Nov 1960 | GB |
| 1463444 | Feb 1977 | GB |
| 1559948 | Jan 1980 | GB |
| 1595082 | Aug 1981 | GB |
| WO 8201408 | Apr 1982 | WO |
| WO 9006480 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO 01081505 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 2005010320 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005045192 | May 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080173443 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60482135 | Jun 2003 | US | |
| 60511994 | Oct 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10558068 | US | |
| Child | 12011456 | US |
