Methods of treating and diagnosing Parkinsons disease and related dysautonomic disorders

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8012710
  • Patent Number
    8,012,710
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 19, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 6, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Prouty; Rebecca
    • Martin; Paul
    Agents
    • Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Abstract
A method for treating a Parkinson's patient with digestive/pancreatic enzymes involves administering an effective amount of digestive/pancreatic enzymes to an individual having the disorder in order to improve a symptom of the disorder. In addition, a method is provided for determining whether an individual has, or may develop, Parkinson's disease or related dysautonomic disorders and for determining whether an individual will benefit from the administration of pancreatic/digestive enzymes to treat the dysautonomic disorder.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to a method for treating Parkinson's disease and related dysautonomic disorders and a method for diagnosing individuals with Parkinson's disease or related dysautonomic disorders. More particularly, the invention relates to a diagnosis method of analyzing a stool sample of an individual for the presence of a biological marker (or marker compound) that provides an indication of whether the individual has, or can develop, Parkinson's disease or a related dysautonomic disorder, as well as a therapeutic method for treating Parkinson's disease or a related dysautonomic disorder by the administration of pancreatic/digestive enzymes.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The nervous system of the body is comprised of two separate systems, the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system. The peripheral nervous system is comprised of the somatic or “voluntary” nervous system and the autonomic or “automatic” nervous system.


The autonomic nervous system is further broken down into the parasympathetic, sympathetic, and enteric nervous systems. Additionally, it is known that the adrenal glands help to support the sympathetic responses of the autonomic nervous system and the enteric nervous system deals exclusively with the gastrointestinal system. With some overlap they each control various autonomic functions of the body through regulation so neurotransmitter releases which affect nervous control


Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter used by the parasympathetic nervous system, while nor epinephrine is utilized by the sympathetic nervous system. The adrenal glands secrete epinephrine which help to support the sympathetic nervous system. Norepinephrine and epinephrine together with a substance most affected in Parkinson's disease; dopamine, make up a category of hormones known as the catecholamines.


The enteric nervous system exerts tremendous control over the digestive processes of the body, including gastrointestinal blood flow, secretion absorption, and overall breakdown of food. The enteric nervous system contains a significant number of neurons, thought to be as numerous as those found in the central nervous system. The enteric nervous system is comprised of three types of neurons: sensory, motor, and interneurons. While the sensory neurons are able to determine the environment of the lumen including chemical, ph, thermal and mechanical changes within the lumen, the motor neurons, including those to the pancreatic exocrine cells, control digestion and play a major role in the breakdown of food and the ultimate absorption of nutrients.


There are two network of nerve plexuses which constitute the enteric nervous system: the myenteric plexus and the submucous plexus. The two plexuses extend from the esophagus to the anus and thus run almost the entire route of the gastrointestinal system.


The submucous plexus, which is not continuous throughout the gastrointestinal tract, is located in the submucosal layer of the gastrointestinal tract. Its primary function is to assess the luminal activity of the GI system, and therefore exert tremendous control over GI blood flow, secretions into the lumen and absorption rates of such things as nutrients, water, and hormones such as secretin which is secreted into the blood stream as a result of the enteric nervous systems determination of low Ph of the bolus of food entering the small intestine. This further ultimately determines the role of the pancreatic/digestive enzymes.


The myenteric plexus controls digestive motility and is located in between the longitudinal and circular layers of muscle in the tunica muscularis. It is this segment of the enteric nervous system which may be initially affected in Parkinson's disease.


The overall digestive process includes the communication between the autonomic (enteric) nervous system and the central nervous system as digestion does not happen solely as a function of the autonomic nervous system. Additionally, there are significant enteric hormones that affect digestion, including secretin, which are under the control of the autonomic nervous system. From the autonomic nervous system, there is an overall increase in the stimulation of digestion from the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system which occurs mainly through the secretion of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, while norepinephrine, secreted by the sympathetic nervous system decreases digestion in the gastrointestinal tract.


Dysautonomias are diseases and syndromes that relate to the autonomic nervous system of the individual. Hence in individuals afflicted with dysautonomias, many normal and automatic functions of the body are left with poor function or little to no function at all.


There are a plethora of dysautonomic disorders in which the symptoms of autonomic dysfunction are manifest. For instance, Parkinson's disease is marked by mild to severe autonomic dysfunction including changes in gait, tremor, discoordination, increased salivary flow, and overall loss of autonomic function. Additionally, changes in executive function are typically noted in a Parkinson's patient, often allowing the patient to appear as having Alzheimer's disease and resulting in misdiagnosis. Executive function disorders are also found in autistic children.


It has been noted that a lack of secretin response, which is directly under the control of the enteric nervous system, may underlie may other conditions. Further, the use of secretin directly as a therapeutic agent may be efficacious as in the case of those with familial dysautonomia.


Parkinson's disease is widespread throughout the Western hemisphere and was first reported by physician James Parkinson in 1817. Parkinson's disease is first detected as a tremor in a limb, and ultimately progresses to include 3 manifestations: (i) rigidity, which is characterized by “cog-wheel” like movement and “lead-pipe” rigidity; (ii) bradykinesia or slowness in movement, and (iii) postural instability associated with a stooped stance and an impaired gait. These altered movements are features of the motor dysfunction, but in addition there can also be a mental impairment in as many as 40% of all Parkinson's patients.


It is known that Parkinson's disease is caused by a deficient state of levo-dopamine in the brain. More specifically, levo-dopa induced dyskinesis in Parkinson's patients is thought to be a result of denervation of the substantia nigra. To date, medical science has not found a substrate that would allow an injectable form of levo-dopa to reach the brain and successfully cross the blood brain barrier. The current dopamine replacement therapy is aimed at either direct replacement or mimicking the action at the dopamine receptor sites in the brain. Sinemet™. and Sinemet CR™ are the two major drugs suited to that end. While the levo-dopa therapy can create some beneficial changes initially, those changes generally wane over time, and produce other problems such as severe sleep disturbance, dyskinesias, and constant nausea. Medical approaches to Parkinson's disease include surgical destruction of the tissue of the brain and the insertion of microelectrodes (deep brain electrical stimulation) to effected portions of the brain. The insertion of electrodes has the advantage of being reversible. These interventions, however, are generally transient and neither produces a permanent change in the Parkinsonian state nor reverses the effects of the disease.


Some authors suggest that Parkinson's disease is a multifactor, neurodegenerative disorder, which evolves due to excessive oxidation. The substantia nigra is susceptible to oxidative damage which supports this theory of the formation of Parkinson's disease. Abnormalities of the oxidative phosphorylation impair the mitochondria of the substantia nigra, and intensify free radical generation.


While the dyskinesias and loss of executive functioning of the brain receive the most significant mention with respect to Parkinson's disease, other physical manifestations exist that are associated with autonomic dysfunction which are often poorly understood. Some of these manifestations include, e.g.: esophageal reflux, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal dysfunction. In addition, excessive sweating, sleep disturbances and other symptoms of Parkinson's disease are very similar to those found in familial dysautonomia.


It has long been held that protein restricted diets, timed protein intake diets, or low protein diets were essential for the absorption of certain medications, especially levo-dopa, in the patient afflicted with Parkinson's disease. Many studies have demonstrated the possibility that the large neutral amino acids (tryptophan, valine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine) may interfere with the absorption of the 1-dopamine. Numerous studies have been performed and much postulation has been made about various diets. It has long been held by the inventor that there was a decrease in protein digestion in the dysautonomic patient, including those with Parkinson's disease. This lack of protein digestion would therefore necessitate an alteration in the protein intake in individuals with this type of dysfunction, including a decrease in the ingestion of certain proteins which may be difficult to digest without the presence of the necessary digestive enzyme and/or proper functioning of the secretin mechanism, and the over-ingestion of protein to make up for that which is not digested when there in an apparent impairment in protein digestive function. For example, if an individual needed 40 grams of protein a day to sustain function, but had only a mechanism which was 10% effective then the individual would gravitate toward a diet which was higher in protein and protein which would be easier to digest.


This fact has recently been demonstrated in a paper found in Movement Disorders: Protein Intake in Parkinsonian patients using the EPIC food frequency questionnaire by Marczewska on Apr. 18, 2006. In this paper, 45 Parkinson's patients were evaluated using the EPIC food questionnaire. While average caloric intake was normal in the Parkinson's patients, they consumed significantly higher amounts of protein (mainly in the form of vegetable proteins). The overall protein intake was 50% higher than the recommended daily allowance (1.2 g/kg vs. 0.8 g/kg). More importantly, it showed that the more severe the symptoms of the patient, the greater the protein intake by the patient.


Further, chymotrypsin appears to continue to be a biomarker for those with Parkinson's disease as the chymotrypsin cleaves only essential amino acids. If there is a dearth of chymotrypsin, then the essential amino acids needed by the body will not be available, and a greater ingestion of protein may be needed in order to attain sufficient essential amino acids.


Accordingly, in view of such findings, a method for determining whether an individual suffering from a dysautonomic disorder and/or any disorder comprising dysautonomic components will benefit from the administration of secretin, or pancreatic/digestive enzymes, would be highly advantageous. In addition, a method for aiding in the diagnosis of individuals who may develop Parkinson's disease and related conditions or symptoms is highly desirable.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to methods for aiding in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and related disorders including, but not limited to Familial Dysautonomia (FD) (or Riley-Day Syndrome), orthostatic intolerance syndrome including mitral value prolapse, postural tachycardia syndrome 35 (POTS), and idiopathic hypovolemia, and Diabetic autonomic failure, and for treating individuals diagnosed as having Parkinson's disease or related disorders including, but not limited to Familial Dysautonomia (FD) (or Riley-Day Syndrome)orthostatic intolerance syndrome including mitral value prolapse, postural tachycardia syndrome 35 (POTS), and idiopathic hypovolemia, and Diabetic autonomic failure.


In one embodiment, a method is provided for treating Parkinson's disease patients, including those who are likely to develop the disorder or those who presently have the disorder, through the administration of digestive/pancreatic enzymes.


In another embodiment, a diagnostic method is provided for determining whether an individual has, or may develop, Parkinson's disease or related disorders and for determining whether an individual will benefit from the administration of pancreatic/digestive enzymes to treat the dysautonomic disorder. In one embodiment, the diagnostic method analyzes a compound in a stool sample of an individual and correlates the analysis of the compound with a dysautonomic disorder or condition or the lack thereof. In one embodiment, the compound to be analyzed is a pancreatic enzyme, such as chymotrypsin, or any compound that provides an indication of either protein digestion or metabolism, pancreatic function, or an inflammatory process, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the analysis determines a quantitative level of the compound in the stool.


In a further embodiment, a method for treating a Parkinson's patient with digestive/pancreatic enzymes involves administering an effective amount of digestive/pancreatic enzymes to an individual having the disorder in order to improve a symptom of the disorder.


In yet another embodiment, a method for treating a Parkinson's patient with digestive enzymes/pancreatic enzymes involves analyzing a compound in a stool sample of the individual in which the administration of the digestive enzymes/pancreatic enzymes is based on the analysis of the stool sample. In one embodiment, the compound to be analyzed comprises a pancreatic enzyme, such as chymotrypsin, or any compound that provides an indication of either protein digestion or metabolism, pancreatic function, or an inflammatory process, or a combination thereof.


In yet a further embodiment, a process for analyzing the stool sample involves measuring a quantitative level of a pancreatic enzyme, such as chymotrypsin, present in the stool sample and comparing the measured quantitative level with at least one threshold level to determine the efficacy of the digestive enzyme/pancreatic enzyme administration to the individual. In one embodiment, the threshold level is based on a level of the pancreatic enzyme associated with at least one other individual of the same approximate age that does not have Parkinson's disease.


In an additional embodiment, a formulation of digestive enzymes/pancreatic enzymes is provided which is efficacious for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and related disorders.


The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph demonstrating the decrease in occurrences of constipation in Parkinson's patients after administration of digestive enzymes over a period of 180 days.



FIG. 2 is a graph demonstrating the increase in the number of bowel movements in Parkinson's patients after administration of digestive enzymes over a period of 180 days.



FIG. 3 is a graph demonstrating the decrease in occurrences of tremors in Parkinson's patients after administration of digestive enzymes over a period of 180 days.



FIG. 4 is a graph demonstrating the decrease in occurrences of falls in Parkinson's patients after administration of digestive enzymes over a period of 180 days.



FIG. 5 is a graph demonstrating the changes in ambulation in Parkinson's patients after administration of digestive enzymes over a period of 180 days.



FIG. 6 is a graph demonstrating the difference in the fecal chymotrypsin levels of Parkinson's and non-Parkinson's subjects.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention is directed to methods for aiding in the diagnosis of dysautonomic disorders and dysautonomic conditions, and for treating individuals diagnosed as having a dysautonomic disorder and other disorders having dysautonomic components. In one embodiment, a method is provided for determining the presence of abnormal protein digestion and/or pancreatic dysfunction of an individual, especially a child, by analyzing a stool sample of the individual for the quantitative levels of one or more pancreatic enzymes including, but not limited to, chymotrypsin, so as to determine if the individual has, or may develop, a dysautonomic disorder or condition. In another embodiment, a method is provided for determining whether the individual is likely to benefit from the administration of secretin, CCK, VIP, digestive enzymes, other peptides, and/or neuropeptides. Until now, there has been no clear biological marker for dysautonomic disorders or conditions to allow early diagnosis or screening of such disorders or conditions.


It has been discovered by the inventor herein that a population of individuals suffering from dysautonomic disorders such as Parkinson's disease have abnormal or pathologic levels of pancreatic enzymes such as chymotrypsin in their stools. It is postulated that in dysautonomic syndromes, the partial paresis of the gastrointestinal tract, and therefore the lack of functioning of the secretory cells of the proximal small intestine, preclude the proper formation and/or release of secretin. It is further postulated that this abnormal protein digestion, as reflected by the low levels of pancreatic enzymes such as chymotrypsin, can be improved by the administration of secretin, CCK, VIP, other neuropeptides, peptides, and/or digestive enzymes to thereby ameliorate the symptoms of dysautonomic conditions. Indeed, as a low measure of fecal chymotrypsin, for example, expresses an abnormality of protein digestion and/or pancreatic dysfunction, it is postulated that an improvement of protein digestion to promote normal growth and development of an individual suffering from a dysautonomic disorder or dysautonomic condition by the administration of secretin, CCK, VIP, other neuropeptides and/or peptides and/or digestive enzymes, can ameliorate the dysautonomic symptoms.


In one embodiment, a stable preparation of digestive/pancreatic enzymes is formed into a dosage formulation containing a therapeutically effective amount of a protease, an amylase, and/or a lipase. The formulation may include additional enzymes, such as pancreatin, chymotrypsin, trypsin, papain and/or papaya. The dosage formulation may be administered by an oral preparation including, but not limited to, an encapsulated tablet, mini-tabs, microcapsule, mini-capsule, time released capsule, sprinkle or other methodology. In one embodiment, the oral preparation is encapsulated using PROSOLV® technology. Alternatively, the oral preparation may be encapsulated using enteric coating, lipid encapsulation, direct compression, dry granulation, wet granulation, and/or a combination of these methods.


The dosage formulations may be as follows (USP=U.S. Pharmacopeia):


Example 1

















Amylase
10,000-70,000
USP units/dose



Protease
10,000-80,000
USP units/dose



Lipase
4,000-40,000
USP units/dose



Pancreatin
2,000-6,000
USP units/dose



Chymotrypsin
2-5
mg



Trypsin
60-100
mg



Papain
3,000-30,000
USP units/dose



Papaya
30-500
mg









Example 2

















Protease
40,000
USP units/dose



Chymotrypsin
2-7
mg



Trypsin
60-100
mg



Papaya
30-500
mg









Example 3

















Amylase
30,000
USP units/dose



Protease
40,000
USP units/dose



Lipase
30,000
USP units/dose



Chymotrypsin
2-7
mg



Papaya
30-500
mg









Example 4

















Amylase
30,000
USP units/dose



Protease
40,000-80,000
USP units/dose



Lipase
30,000-80,000
USP units/dose



Chymotrypsin
2
mg



Papain
6,000-30,000
USP units/dose









Other combinations of digestive enzymes may also be used. These enzymes can be in the form of animal or plant derivatives, natural or synthetic.


In a study conducted by the inventor, sixteen subjects diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and ranging in age from 41 to 71 were examined were examined. Physical symptoms of the disease, such as constipation, lack of bowel movements, tremors, falling, and an inability to walk were monitored and measured over a period of 180 days. The subjects were given a dosage of digestive enzymes 3-5 per day. The dosages were administered in the form of encapsulated tablets, capsules, and sprinkles. The dosages were taken with meals and snacks. The digestive enzyme dosage included, but was not limited to, one or more of the following: amylases, proteases, pancreatin, papain, papaya, lipases, chymotrypsin, and trypsin.


Ninety-five percent of adults have bowel movements between three and 21 times per week, and this would be considered normal. The most common pattern is one bowel movement a day. However, some people do not have bowel movements every day or the same number of bowel movements each day. Medically speaking, constipation usually is defined as fewer than three bowel movements per week. Severe constipation is defined as less than one bowel movement per week.


Referring to FIG. 1, a majority of the subjects experienced moderate to severe constipation prior to any treatment with digestive enzymes. The severity of the constipation was measured on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 equaling no constipation and 7 equaling severe constipation. The subjects were monitored at 30, 90, 120 and 180 day intervals. Over the course of the 180 day treatment, the severity of the constipation decreased from severe to moderate to mild in the majority of the subjects.


Referring to FIG. 2, the number of bowel movements per week experienced by most of the subjects was lower than normal prior to any treatment with digestive enzymes. The subjects were monitored at 30, 90, 120 and 180 day intervals. Over the course of the 180 day treatment, the number of bowel movements per week increased to 3 or more in the majority of subjects.


Static tremors, or “resting tremors”, are tremors that occurs despite the limb being fully supported and at rest against gravity. They usually progress at the rate of 4-7 Hz (hertz), and are the typical Parkinsonian tremor. The amplitude of the tremor often decrease with sleep, complete relaxation or voluntary activity. Tremors are often the first symptom that people with Parkinson's disease or their family members notice. Initially, the tremors may appear in just one limb (arm or leg) or only on one side of the body. The tremors also may affect the lips, tongue, neck, or eyelids. As the disease progresses, the tremors may spread to both sides of the body, although in some cases the tremors remain on just one side. Emotional and physical stress tend to make the tremors worse.


Referring to FIG. 3, a majority of the subjects experienced severe tremors prior to any treatment with digestive enzymes. The severity of the tremors was measured on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 equaling no tremors and 7 equaling severe tremors. The subjects were monitored at 30, 90, 120 and 180 day intervals. Over the course of the 180 day treatment, the severity of the tremors decreased from severe to moderate to mild in a majority of the subjects.


Many Parkinson's patients develop gait and balance problems and this can lead to falls. Ambulation is with a stooped posture using a short, shuffling gait. This is primarily due to the loss of balance control. Unfortunately with Parkinson's disease, the muscles become stiff and patients have difficulty swinging their arms when walking which helps in keeping one's balance. They also have episodes of freezing which literally have them “stuck in place” when initiating a step and they exhibit a slight foot drag which makes tripping easy. Persons with Parkinson's have difficulty in judging spatial relationships. Thus, falls often happen when navigating through doorways or through narrow passages.


Referring to FIG. 4, a majority of the subjects experienced an elevated number of falls prior to any treatment with digestive enzymes. The subjects were monitored at 30, 90, 120 and 180 days. Over the course of the 180 day treatment, the number of falls decreased to less than two per week in a majority of the subjects.


Referring to FIG. 5, a majority of the subjects experienced severe difficulty in ambulation prior to any treatment with digestive enzymes. The difficulty in ambulation was measured on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 equaling no difficulty and 7 equaling severe difficulty. The subjects were monitored at 30, 90, 120 and 180 day intervals. Over the course of the 180 day treatment, the difficulty in ambulation decreased from severe to moderate to some or no difficulty in a majority of the subjects.


Fecal chymotrypsin levels were also measured in the 16 subjects and compared to the fecal chymotrypsin levels of 16 subjects who did not have Parkinson's disease. The non-Parkinson's subjects ranged in age from 44 to 77. Fecal chymotrypsin is a sensitive, specific measure of proteolytic activity. Normal levels of chymotrypsin are considered be greater than 8.4 U/gram. Decreased values (less than 4.2 U/gram) suggest diminished pancreatic output (pancreatic insufficiency), hypoacidity of the stomach or cystic fibrosis. Elevated chymotrypsin values suggest rapid transit time, or less likely, a large output of chymotrypsin from the pancreas.


A stool sample was collected from each of the subjects. Each stool sample was analyzed using an enzymatic photospectrometry analysis to determine the level of fecal chymotrypsin in the stool. Alternatively, other methods, such as the calorimetric method, use of substrates, use of assays, and/or any other suitable method may be used to measure the fecal chymotrypsin levels. The levels of fecal chymotrypsin in the Parkinson's patients was compared to the levels of fecal chymotrypsin in the non-Parkinson's subjects to determine if the Parkinson's patients would benefit from the administration of digestive enzymes.


Referring to FIG. 6, the fecal chymotrypsin levels of the Parkinson's patients ranged from 0.8 to 6.6 U/gram, with a mean of 2.84 U/gram, while the fecal chymotrypsin levels of the non-Parkinson's patients ranged from 9.2. to 47.4 U/gram, with a mean of 28 U/gram. Thus, it can be seen that the fecal chymotrypsin levels of the Parkinson's patients were markedly decreased when compared to the non-Parkinson's subjects.


In summary, the results of the study described herein demonstrate that administration of digestive enzymes benefits individuals having a dysautonomic disorder, such as Parkinson's disease, by ameliorating the symptoms of the disorder. Furthermore, the results of the study indicate that measurement of the fecal chymotrypsin level in individuals having a dysautonomic disorder can determine if the individual will benefit from the administration of digestive enzymes.


The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method of diagnosing a patient comprising: a. obtaining a fecal sample from the patient;b. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample; andc. diagnosing the patient as having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is 8.4 U/gram or less, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fecal chymotrypsin level is between 8.4 and 4.2 U/gram.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fecal chymotrypsin level is less than 4.2 U/gram.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined using an enzymatic photospectrometry method.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 8. A method of screening a patient comprising: a. determining the level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. identifying the patient as having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined chymotrypsin level is 8.4 U/gram or less, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined using an enzymatic photospectrometry method.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 12. A method of confirming a diagnosis of a patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder, comprising: a. obtaining a fecal sample from the patient;b. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample; andc. confirming the diagnosis of the patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is 8.4 U/gram or less, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined using an enzymatic photospectrometry method.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 16. A method of confirming a diagnosis of a patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder comprising: a. determining the level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. confirming the diagnosis of the patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined chymotrypsin level is 8.4 U/gram or less, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined using an enzymatic photospectrometry method.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 19. The method of claim 16, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 20. A method of determining if an individual has a likelihood propensity to develop a dysautonomic disorder comprising: a. determining the fecal chymotrypsin levels of the patient over a period of time; andb. determining that the individual has a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin levels exhibit a decreasing trend over time and at least one level is 8.4 U/gram or less, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined using an enzymatic photospectrometry method.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 24. A method of diagnosing a patient comprising: a. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. diagnosing the patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is less than a normal fecal chymotrypsin level, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 26. The method of claim 24, wherein the normal fecal chymotrypsin level is a level of fecal chymotrypsin associated with at least one other individual of the same approximate age that does not have the disorder.
  • 27. The method of claim 24, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 28. A method of screening a patient comprising: a. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. identifying the patient as having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is less than a threshold fecal chymotrypsin level, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dvsautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 30. The method of claim 28, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 31. A method of confirming a diagnosis of a patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder, comprising: a. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. confirming the diagnosis of the patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is less than a normal fecal chymotrypsin level, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 33. The method of claim 31, wherein the normal fecal chymotrypsin level is a level of fecal chymotrypsin associated with at least one other individual of the same approximate age that does not have the disorder.
  • 34. The method of claim 31, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 35. A method of confirming a diagnosis of a patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder, comprising: a. determining a level of chymotrypsin present in a fecal sample obtained from the patient; andb. confirming the diagnosis of the patient as having a dysautonomic disorder or having a likelihood to develop a dysautonomic disorder if the determined fecal chymotrypsin level is less than a threshold fecal chymotrypsin level, wherein said dysautonomic disorder is selected from the group consisting of Familial dysautonomia (FD), Diabetic autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease or Orthostatic intolerance.
  • 36. The method of claim 35, wherein the level of chymotrypsin present in the fecal sample is determined at 30° C.
  • 37. The method of claim 35, further comprising determining if the patient exhibits one or more symptoms of a dysautonomic disorder.
  • 38. The method of claim 1, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 31 or 35 herein the dysautonomic disorder is Parkinson's disease.
  • 39. The method of claim 1, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 31 or 35 wherein the dysautonomic disorder is Familial dysautonomia (FD).
  • 40. The method of claim 1, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 31 or 35 wherein the dysautonomic disorder is Diabetic autonomic failure.
  • 41. The method of claim 1, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 31 or 35 wherein the dysautonomic disorder is Orthostatic intolerance.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/046,252, filed on Mar. 11, 2008, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/555,697, filed Nov. 2, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/730,567, filed Dec. 8, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,138,123, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/929,592, filed Aug. 14, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,660,831, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/224,991, filed Aug. 14, 2000. Each of these applications are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.

US Referenced Citations (94)
Number Name Date Kind
3002883 Butt et al. Oct 1961 A
3223594 Hoek et al. Dec 1965 A
3357894 Jose et al. Dec 1967 A
3515642 Mima et al. Jun 1970 A
3574819 Gross et al. Apr 1971 A
3940478 Kurtz Feb 1976 A
4079125 Sipos Mar 1978 A
4145410 Sears Mar 1979 A
4241046 Papahadjopoulos et al. Dec 1980 A
4826679 Roy May 1989 A
5190775 Klose Mar 1993 A
5250418 Moller et al. Oct 1993 A
5324514 Sipos Jun 1994 A
5436319 Kung et al. Jul 1995 A
5437319 Garuglieri Aug 1995 A
5439935 Rawlings et al. Aug 1995 A
5460812 Sipos Oct 1995 A
5476661 Pillai et al. Dec 1995 A
5527678 Blaser et al. Jun 1996 A
5585115 Sherwood et al. Dec 1996 A
5607863 Chandler Mar 1997 A
5648335 Lewis et al. Jul 1997 A
5674532 Atzl et al. Oct 1997 A
5686311 Shaw Nov 1997 A
5750104 Sipos May 1998 A
5776917 Blank et al. Jul 1998 A
5858758 Hillman et al. Jan 1999 A
5952178 Lapidus et al. Sep 1999 A
5958875 Longo et al. Sep 1999 A
5985891 Rowe Nov 1999 A
6011001 Navia et al. Jan 2000 A
6013286 Klose Jan 2000 A
6020310 Beck et al. Feb 2000 A
6020314 McMichael Feb 2000 A
6153236 Wu et al. Nov 2000 A
6187309 McMichael et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197746 Beck et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210950 Johnson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6251478 Pacifico et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261613 Narayanaswamy et al. Jul 2001 B1
6280726 Weinrauch et al. Aug 2001 B1
6309669 Setterstrom et al. Oct 2001 B1
6399101 Frontanes et al. Jun 2002 B1
6482839 Thornfeldt Nov 2002 B1
6534063 Fallon Mar 2003 B1
6534259 Wakefield Mar 2003 B1
6632429 Fallon Oct 2003 B1
6660831 Fallon Dec 2003 B2
6727073 Moore et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743447 Labergerie et al. Jun 2004 B2
6797291 Richardson Sep 2004 B2
6835397 Lee et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852487 Barany et al. Feb 2005 B1
7101573 Szymczak et al. Sep 2006 B2
7129053 Reiter et al. Oct 2006 B1
7138123 Fallon Nov 2006 B2
20020037284 Fallon Mar 2002 A1
20020081628 Fallon Jun 2002 A1
20020090653 Fallon Jul 2002 A1
20030097122 Ganz et al. May 2003 A1
20040057944 Galle et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040057962 Timmerman Mar 2004 A1
20040071683 Fallon Apr 2004 A1
20040076590 Wilkins Apr 2004 A1
20040101562 Maio May 2004 A1
20040121002 Lee et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040209790 Sava et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050187130 Brooker et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060105379 Wu et al. May 2006 A1
20060182728 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060183180 Fallon Aug 2006 A1
20060198838 Fallon Sep 2006 A1
20060259995 Cayouette et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070053895 Fallon Mar 2007 A1
20070116695 Fallon May 2007 A1
20080058282 Fallon Mar 2008 A1
20080152637 Fallon Jun 2008 A1
20080161265 Fallon et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080166334 Fallon Jul 2008 A1
20080219966 Fallon Sep 2008 A1
20080254009 Finegold Oct 2008 A1
20080279839 Schuler et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080317731 Gramatikova et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090130081 Fallon May 2009 A1
20090197289 Fallon Aug 2009 A1
20090232789 Fallon Sep 2009 A1
20090263372 Fallon Oct 2009 A1
20090286270 Fallon Nov 2009 A1
20090324572 Fallon Dec 2009 A1
20090324730 Fallon Dec 2009 A1
20100092447 Fallon Apr 2010 A1
20100169409 Fallon et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100233218 Fallon Sep 2010 A1
20100260857 Fallon et al. Oct 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
43 32 985 Mar 1995 DE
0451484 Oct 1991 EP
0564739 Apr 1995 EP
0 564 739 Jan 2000 EP
2347742 Sep 2000 GB
62230714 Oct 1987 JP
WO 9522344 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9822499 May 1998 WO
WO 9852593 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9964059 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0009142 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0127612 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0143764 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0127612 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0214537 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0214537 May 2002 WO
WO 2009114757 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010002972 Jan 2010 WO
WO 2010080830 Jul 2010 WO
WO 2010080835 Jul 2010 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090285790 A1 Nov 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60224991 Aug 2000 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11555697 Nov 2006 US
Child 12046252 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12046252 Mar 2008 US
Child 12487868 US
Parent 09929592 Aug 2001 US
Child 10730567 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10730567 Dec 2003 US
Child 11555697 US