Patent Grant
11766835
The present disclosure related to methods for producing fiber composites and products that may be made from those fiber composites.
No federal funds were used to develop or create the invention disclosed and described in the patent application.
Synthetic polymers such as polystyrene are routinely welded using solvents such as dichloromethane. Ionic liquids (e.g., 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate) can dissolve natural fiber biopolymers (e.g., cellulose and silk) without derivatization. Natural fiber welding is a process by which biopolymer fibers are fused in a manner roughly analogous to traditional plastic welding.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,202,379, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, one type of process solvent that may be used for partially dissolving a natural fiber for structural and chemical modifications is ionic liquid-based solvents. This patent discloses basic principles developed using bench top equipment and materials. However, among various other things, this patent fails to disclose processes and apparatuses for making composite materials at a commercial scale.
There are examples of natural fibers biopolymer solutions that are cast into molds to create a desired generally two-dimensional shape. In these cases, the biopolymer is fully dissolved so that the original structure is disrupted and biopolymers are denatured. By contrast, with fiber welding, the fiber interior (the core of each individual fiber) is intentionally left in its native state. This is advantageous because the final structure composed of biopolymers retains some of the original material properties for creating robust materials from biopolymers such as silk, cellulose, chitin, chitosan, other polysaccharides and combinations thereof.
Traditional methods of using biopolymer solutions are also disadvantaged in that there is a physical limit to how much polymer can be dissolved in solution. For example, solutions that are 10% by mass cotton (cellulose) with 90% by mass ionic liquid solvent are viscous and difficult to handle, even at elevated temperatures. The fiber welding process allows fiber bundles to be manipulated into the desired shape before welding commences. The use and handling of natural fibers often grants control over the engineering of the final product that is not possible for solution-based technologies.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the methods and systems.
Before the present methods and apparatuses are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that the methods and apparatuses are not limited to specific methods, specific components, or to particular implementations. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments/aspects only and is not intended to be limiting.
As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.
“Aspect” when referring to a method, apparatus, and/or component thereof does not mean that limitation, functionality, component etc. referred to as an aspect is required, but rather that it is one part of a particular illustrative disclosure and not limiting to the scope of the method, apparatus, and/or component thereof unless so indicated in the following claims.
Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the word “comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other components, integers or steps. “Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey an indication of a preferred or ideal embodiment. “Such as” is not used in a restrictive sense, but for explanatory purposes.
Disclosed are components that can be used to perform the disclosed methods and apparatuses. These and other components are disclosed herein, and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions, groups, etc. of these components are disclosed that while specific reference of each various individual and collective combinations and permutation of these may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods and apparatuses. This applies to all aspects of this application including, but not limited to, steps in disclosed methods. Thus, if there are a variety of additional steps that can be performed it is understood that each of these additional steps can be performed with any specific embodiment or combination of embodiments of the disclosed methods.
The present methods and apparatuses may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of preferred aspects and the examples included therein and to the Figures and their previous and following description. Corresponding terms may be used interchangeably when referring to generalities of configuration and/or corresponding components, aspects, features, functionality, methods and/or materials of construction, etc. those terms.
It is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The present disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that phraseology and terminology used herein with reference to device or element orientation (such as, for example, terms like “front”, “back”, “up”, “down”, “top”, “bottom”, and the like) are only used to simplify description, and do not alone indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a particular orientation. In addition, terms such as “first”, “second”, and “third” are used herein and in the appended claims for purposes of description and are not intended to indicate or imply relative importance or significance.
Throughout this disclosure, various terms may be used to describe certain components of process, apparatuses, and/or other components that may be used in conjunction with the present disclosure. For clarity, definitions of some of those terms are provided immediately below. However, when used to describe such components, these terms and the definitions thereof are not meant to be limiting in scope unless so indicated in the following claims, but instead are meant to be illustrative of one or more aspects of the present disclosure. Additionally, the inclusion of any term and/or definition thereof is not meant to require a manifestation of that component in any specific process or apparatus disclosed herein unless so indicated in the following claims.
A. Substrate Materials
“Substrate” as used herein may include either a pure biomaterial (e.g., cotton yarn, etc.), a plurality of biomaterials (e.g., lignocellulosic fibers mixed with silk fibers), or a material containing a known amount of a biomaterial. In one aspect, a substrate may contain natural materials that contain at least one biopolymer component that is held together by hydrogen bonding (e.g., cellulose). In certain aspects, the term “substrate” may refer to synthetic materials, such as polyester, nylon, etc.; however, instances in which the term “substrate” refers to synthetic materials typically will be specifically noted throughout. The fusion or welding process may be performed in a way that limits the denaturation of at least one component of the substrate. For example, a limited amount of a process solvent may be added at moderate temperatures and pressures and for a controlled time to limit the denaturation of lignocellulosic fibers.
“Cellulosic-based substrate” may include cotton, pulp, and/or other refined cellulosic fiber and/or particles, etc.
“Lignocellulosic-based substrate” may include wood, hemp, corn stover, bean straw, grass, etc.
“Other sugar-based biopolymer substrates” may include chitin, chitosan, etc.
“Protein-based substrates” may include keratin (e.g., wool, hooves, horns, nails), silk, collagen, elastin, tissues, etc.
“Raw substrate” as used herein may include any substrate that has a not been subjected to any welding process.
B. Substrate Format Types
Substrate formats can be a variety of commercially available or customized products. ‘Loose,’ one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and/or three-dimensional (3D) substrates are all possible for use in various processes according to the present disclosure. Finished welded substrates or composites may be shaped in 1D, 2D, and/or 3D, respectively. The following definitions are applicable to both substrates and welded substrates (as defined further below).
“Loose” may include any natural fiber and/or particles or mixture of natural fibers and/or particles that is fed into the welding process in a loose, and/or relatively untangled format (e.g., mixtures of loose cotton with wood fibers and/or particles).
“1D” may include yarn and thread, both non-piled singled and piled yarns and threads.
“2D” may include paper substitute (e.g., cardboard alternatives, packaging paper, etc.), board substitute (e.g., alternatives to hardboard, plywood, OSB, MDF, dimensional lumber, etc.).
“3D” may include automotive parts, structural building components (e.g., extruded beams, joists, walls, etc.), furniture parts, toys, electronics cases and/or components, etc.
Generally, a resulting welded substrate or composite material may be composed of significant amounts of natural material (e.g., material produced by lifeforms and/or enzymes), wherein the natural material may be held together by the fusion or welding of the biopolymers of the natural materials rather than glues, resins, and/or other adhesives.
C. Process Solvent System
“Process solvent” may include a material capable of disrupting intermolecular forces of the substrate (e.g., hydrogen bonds), and includes materials that can swell, mobilize, and/or dissolve at least one biopolymer component within the substrate and/or otherwise disrupt the forces that may bind one biopolymer component to another.
“Pure process solvents” may include a process solvent without additional additives, and may include ionic liquids, 3-ethyl-1-methylimidizolium acetate, 3-butyl-1-methylimidizolium chloride, and other similar salts currently known or later developed that serve to disrupt intermolecular forces of a substrate.
“Deep eutectic process solvents” may include ionic solvents that incorporate one or more compound in a mixture form to give a eutectic with a melting point lower than one or more of the components that make up the mixture, and may further include a pure ionic liquid process solvent mixed with other ionic liquids and/or molecular species.
“Mixed organic process solvents” may include ionic liquids (e.g., 3-ethyl-1-methylimidizolium acetate) mixed with polar protic (e.g., methanol) and/or polar aprotic solvents (e.g., acetonitrile) as well as solutions containing 4-methylmorpholine 4-oxide (also known as N-methylmorpholine N-oxide, NMMO).
“Mixed inorganic process solvents” may include aqueous salt solutions (e.g., aqueous solutions of LiOH and/or NAOH that may be mixed with urea or other molecular additives, aqueous guanidinium chloride, LiCl in N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc), etc.).
In an aspect, process solvents may contain additional functional materials such as a relatively small amount (e.g., less than 10% by mass) fully solubilized natural polymer(s) (e.g., cellulose), but may also contain selected synthetic polymers (e.g. meta-aramid), as well as other functional materials.
D. Functional Material
“Functional material” may include natural or synthetic inorganic materials (e.g., magnetic or conductive materials, magnetic microparticles, catalysts, etc.), natural or synthetic organic materials (e.g., carbon, dyes (including but not limited to florescent and phosphorescent), enzymes, catalysts, polymer, etc.), and/or devices (e.g., RFID tags, MEMS devices, integrated circuits) that may add features, functionality, and/or benefits to a substrate. Additionally, functional materials may be placed in substrates and/or process solvents.
E. Process Wetted Substrate
“Process wetted substrate” may refer to a substrate of any combination of format and type that is wetted with a process solvent applied to all or a part of the substrate. Accordingly, a process wetted substrate may contain some partially dissolved, mobilized natural polymer.
F. Reconstitution Solvent System
“Reconstitution solvent” may include a liquid that has a non-zero vapor pressure and may be capable of forming mixtures with ions from the process solvent system. In an aspect, one characteristic of a reconstitution solvent system may be that it is not be capable of dissolving natural materials substrates on its own. Generally, the reconstitution solvent may be used to separate and remove process solvent ions from substrates. That is to say, in one aspect reconstitution solvent removes process solvent from a process wetted substrate. In so doing, the process wetted substrate may be transformed to a reconstituted wetted substrate as defined below.
Reconstitution solvents may include polar protic solvents (e.g., water, alcohols, etc.) and/or polar aprotic solvents (e.g., acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, etc.). Reconstitution solvents may be mixtures of molecular components and may include ionic components. In an aspect, a reconstitution solvent may be used to help control the distribution of functional materials within a substrate. A reconstitution solvent may be configured to be chemically similar to or substantially chemically identical to a molecular additive in a process solvent system.
In an aspect, a (pure) reconstitution solvent may be mixed with ionic components to form a process solvent. A reconstitution solvent may be configured to be chemically similar to or substantially chemically identical to a molecular additive in a process solvent system. For example, acetonitrile is a polar aprotic molecular liquid with a non-zero vapor pressure that is not capable of dissolving cellulose when pure. Acetonitrile may be mixed with a sufficient amount of 3-ethyl-1-methylimidizolium acetate to form a solution that is capable of disrupting hydrogen bonding, and acetonitrile may be used as the reconstitution solvent. Mixtures that contain the sufficient concentration (ionic strength) of the appropriate ions are thus able to serve as a process solvent. Within the present disclosure, any mixtures of 3-ethyl-1-methylimidizolium acetate in acetonitrile that do not contain sufficient ionic strength to dissolve or mobilize polymer of a natural substrate are considered to be a reconstitution solvent.
G. Reconstituted Wetted Substrate
“Reconstituted wetted substrate” may refer a process wetted substrate of any combination of format and type that is wetted with the reconstitution solvent applied to all or part of the process wetted substrate. Generally, a reconstitution wetted substrate does not contain partially dissolved, mobilized natural polymer, which may be due to the removal of the process solvent via the application of the reconstitution solvent.
H. Drying Gas Systems
“Drying gas” may include a material that is a gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, but may be a supercritical fluid. In an aspect, the drying gas may be capable of mixing with and carrying the non-zero vapor pressure components (e.g., all or a portion of the reconstitution solvent) from both a process wetted substrate and/or a reconstituted wetted substrate. Drying gas may be pure gases (e.g., nitrogen, argon, etc.) or mixtures of gases (e.g., air).
I. Welded Substrate
“Welded substrate” may be used to refer to a finished composite comprised of at least one natural substrate in which one or more individual fibers and/or particles have been fused or welded together via a process solvent acting upon biopolymers from either those fibers and/or particles and/or action upon another natural material within the substrate. Generally, welded substrates may include “finished composites” and/or “fiber-matrix composites.” Specifically, “fiber-matrix composite” may be used to refer to a welded substrate having a natural substrate acting as both the fiber and the matrix of the welded substrate.
J. Welding
“Welding” as used herein may refer to joining and/or fusion of materials by intimate intermolecular association of polymer.
The present disclosure provides various processes and/or apparatuses for converting biopolymer containing fibrous and/or particulate substrate into welded substrates (one example of which is a composite material), and also discloses various products that may be manufactured from the welded substrate(s). Generally, the process steps and/or combination of process steps for converting biopolymer containing fibrous and/or particulate substrate into welded substrates may be referred to herein as the “welding process” without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. In one aspect of a process, a process solvent may be applied to one or more substrates containing natural materials. In an aspect, the process solvent may disrupt one or more intermolecular force (which intermolecular force may include but is not limited to hydrogen bonding) within at least one component of the substrate(s) containing natural material(s).
Upon removal of a portion of the process solvent (which may be accomplished with a reconstitution solvent as described in further detail below), the fibers and/or particles within the substrate(s) may become fused or welded together, which may result in a welded substrate. Through testing it has been determined that the welded substrate may have enhanced physical properties (e.g., enhanced tensile strength) over the original substrate(s) (prior to being subjected to processing). The welded substrate may also be imparted with enhanced chemical properties (e.g., hydrophobicity) or other features/functionality because of either the parameters selected for the welding process itself or the inclusion of functional materials to the substrate(s) before or during the welding process that converts the substrate(s) into a welded substrate.
The various processes and/or apparatuses disclosed herein may be generalized such that the process and/or apparatuses may be configured for use with any number of process solvents and/or substrates (including process solvents and/or substrates that are either known in academic or patent literature as capable of fully dissolving the biopolymers of natural materials or those later developed). In an aspect of the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured such that biopolymer-containing substrate(s) are not fully dissolved in the treatment process. In another aspect, robust composite materials of various compositions and shapes may be produced without glue and/or resin (even in processes configured to not fully dissolve a biopolymer-containing substrate).
Generally, the welding process and/or apparatuses may be configured to carefully and intentionally control the amount of process solvent, the temperature, pressure, duration of process solvent exposure to natural materials, and/or other parameters without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. Additionally, the means by which a process solvent, reconstitution solvent, and/or drying gas can be recycled efficiently for reuse may be optimized for commercialization. As such, disclosed herein is a collection of innovative concepts and features that are not obvious based on prior art. Given that natural materials are generally abundant, inexpensive, and can be produced sustainably, the processes and apparatuses disclosed herein may be the archetype for a transformative and sustainable means to manufacture trillions of dollars per year worth of materials. This technology may allow humankind to move forward in a way that is not restricted by limiting resources such as petroleum and petroleum-containing materials. In an aspect, the present disclosure may achieve this result using novel and non-obvious processes and/or apparatuses configured for use with substrates, process solvents, and/or reconstitution not disclosed in the prior art, which may result in various novel and non-obvious end products.
A. Substrate Feed Zone
Referring now to the figures, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
Generally, a welding process may be configured such that a substrate feed zone 1 comprises a portion of the welding process at which a substrate format(s) may be controllably fed to (enter) the welding process and/or apparatuses associated therewith. The substrate feed zone 1 may include equipment that creates a particular substrate format(s) from a particular substrate material or mixture of substrate materials. Alternatively, the substrate feed may be configured to deliver rolls of premade substrate formats. Substrates may be pushed or pulled through the substrate feed zone 1. Substrate may ride a powered conveyor system. Substrates may be fed through the substrate feed zone 1 by an extrusion-type screw. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is not limited by whether, and/or how the substrate moves in the substrate feed zone 1, and/or whether the substrate remains stationary and the equipment and/or other components of the welding process move with respect to the substrate unless so indicated in the following claims.
Substrates may contain additional functional materials that may be added to the substrate within the substrate feed zone 1. Equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor and control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and/or feed rate of materials within the substrate feed zone 1. Generally, the substrate or multiple substrates may move from the substrate feed zone 1 to the process solvent application zone 2.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure configured for use with certain 1D substrates (e.g., yarn and/or similar substrates), it may be advantageous to include an apparatus that applies a stress to the substrate before it enters the welding process. By applying a predetermined stress to the substrate in advance of entering the fiber welding process, weak sections of the substrate may be broken and exposed. The apparatus may also be configured with a mechanism that ties a knot to reestablish a continuous substrate. The net result is that a welding process so configured may locate and fix weak sections of substrate so as to limit down time. This apparatus may be a standalone machine to improve certain substrates long in advance of performing welding processes. Alternatively, this apparatus can be integrated directly into the substrate feed zone 1.
B. Process Solvent Application
In a process solvent application zone 2, one or more process solvents may be applied to a substrate(s) by immersion, wicking, painting, inkjet printing, spraying, etc. or by any combination thereof as the substrate moves through the process solvent application zone 2. Process solvent may include functional materials and/or molecular additives, both of which are described in further detail below.
In an aspect, a process solvent application zone 2 may be configured with additional equipment that adds functional material(s) to the substrate separately from the process solvent. Equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor and control at least the temperature and/or pressure of process solvent, the substrate, and/or the atmosphere during process solvent application. Equipment and instrumentation that monitors and controls the composition, amount, and/or rate of process solvent applied may be utilized. Process solvent may be applied to specific locations or to the entire substrate depending on the method of process solvent application.
In aspects of a welding process for producing a welded substrate using extrusion, a die may terminate the process solvent application zone 2. A welding process so configured may also include equipment that forms a 1D, 2D, or 3D shape from loose substrate to which process solvent has been applied as the substrate moves through the process solvent application zone 2. Generally, the optimal configuration of a solvent application zone 2 may be dependent at least upon the substrate format, choice of process solvent and/or process solvent system, and apparatuses used to apply the process solvent. These parameters may be configured to achieve a desired amount of viscous drag. “Viscous drag” as used herein denotes the balance between process solvent and/or process solvent system viscosity and mechanical (e.g., pressure, frictions, shear, etc.) forces that apply the process solvent and/or process solvent system into the substrate. In some cases, the optimal viscous drag is configured to result in a welded substrate having consistent properties throughout, and in other cases the optimal viscous drag is configured to result in a modulated welded substrate as discussed in further detail below.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure configured for use with certain 1D substrates (e.g., yarn and/or similar substrates), it may be advantageous to employ a properly sized, needle-like orifice that may be designed to properly apply process solvent (and thereby affect the viscous drag) to the substrate to produce the desired properties of a welded substrate. Process solvent may be controllably metered into the device while substrate simultaneously may be moved through the orifice. At least the temperature, flow rate and flow characteristics of process solvent, and/or substrate feed rate may be monitored and/or controlled to impart desired properties in the finished welded substrate. The orifice size, shape, and configuration (e.g., diameter, length, slope, etc.) may be designed to limit or add to the stress to the substrate as process solvent is applied thereto as discussed in further detail below regarding
The specific configuration of the process solvent application zone 2 may be dependent at least on the specific chemistry used for the process solvent and/or process solvent system. For example, some process solvents and/or process solvent systems are efficacious to swell and mobilize biopolymers at relatively cold temperatures (i.e., LiOH-urea at approximately −5° C. or below) others (i.e., ionic liquids, NMMO, etc.) are efficacious at relatively high temperatures. Certain ionic liquids become efficacious above 50 C while NMMO may require temperatures greater than 90 C. Additionally, the viscosity of many process solvents and/or process solvent systems may be a function of temperature, such that the optimal configuration of various aspects of a process solvent application zone 2 (or other aspects of welding process) may be dependent on the temperature of the process solvent application zone 2, process solvent itself, and/or process solvent system. That is, when a specific process solvent and/or process solvent system is efficacious at a low temperature and is also relatively viscous at that low temperature, the equipment used to apply the process solvent and/or process solvent system to the substrate must be designed to accommodate those temperatures and viscosity. Within the efficacious temperature range of a given process solvent and/or process solvent system, further refinement of the temperature within that range, chemistry (e.g., addition and/or ratio of co-solvents, etc.) of the process solvent and/or process solvent system, configuration of apparatuses associated with the process solvent application zone 2, etc. may be made to result in the appropriate amount of viscous drag which appropriately applies process solvent to the substrate in way that results in a wetted substrate having the desired properties for remaining steps in the welding process. However, the specific operating temperature in the process solvent application zone 2 in no way limits the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
C. Process Temperature/Pressure Zone
Upon the application of process solvent to substrate, the wetted substrate may enter a welding process zone of at least controlled temperature, pressure, and/or atmosphere (composition) for a controlled amount of time. Equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor, modulate, and/or control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and/or feed rate of process wetted substrate within the substrate feed zone 1. In particular, temperature may be controlled and/or modulated by utilizing chillers, convective ovens, microwave, infrared, or any number of other suitable methods or apparatuses.
In one aspect, the process solvent application zone 2 may be discrete from the process temperature/pressure zone 2. However, in another aspect according to the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured such that these two zones 2, 3 into one contiguous segment. For example, a welding process configured such that a substrate may be immersed in and moving through a process solvent bath for a particular time and under controlled temperature and pressure conditions would combine the process solvent application zone 2 and the process temperature/pressure zone 3. Generally, the process solvent application zone 2 and process temperature/pressure zone 3 together may be considered a welding zone.
In aspects of a welding process according to the present disclosure where extrusion is performed, a die may be included within or at the end of the process temperature/pressure zone 3. Other aspects of a welding process according to the present disclosure may also include equipment that forms a 1D, 2D, or 3D shape from loose substrate to which process solvent has been applied and which has moved through the process temperature/pressure zone 3.
D. Process Solvent Recovery Zone
Process solvents may be separated from the substrate within the process solvent recovery zone 4. In an aspect, a process solvent may contain salt that has little or no vapor pressure. To remove process solvent (at least a portion of which process solvent may be comprised of ions) from the substrate, a reconstitution solvent may be introduced. Upon application of a reconstitution solvent to the process wetted substrate, process solvent may move out of the substrate and into the reconstitution solvent. Although not required, in some aspects the reconstitution solvent may flow in a direction opposite to the movement of substrate so that the minimal amount of reconstitution solvent is required to recover process solvent using minimal time, space, and energy where applicable.
In an aspect of a welding process configured according to the present disclosure, the process solvent recovery zone 4 may also be a bath, a series of baths, or series of segments where reconstitution solvent flows opposed or across the process wetted substrate. Equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor and control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and/or flow rate of reconstitution solvent within the process solvent recovery zone 4. Upon exiting this zone 4, the substrate may be wetted with the reconstitution solvent.
In an aspect, it may be optimal to configure a process solvent system with an ionic liquid process solvent in combination with a molecular additive and to configure the reconstitution solvent such that it is chemically similar to or chemically identical to the molecular additive. For process solvents comprised of ionic liquids, it may be beneficial to select a molecular additive comprised having a relatively low boiling point but a relatively high vapor pressure. Additionally, it may be beneficial for such molecular additives to be generally polar aprotic (as polar protic solvents generally may be more difficult to separate from ionic liquids and also tend to decrease the efficacy of ionic liquid-containing solvent systems), such as, but not limited to unless indicated in the following claims, acetonitrile, acetone, and ethyl acetate. For process solvents comprised of aqueous hydroxides (e.g., LiOH), it may be advantageous to select a reconstitution solvent that is comprised of water, which is polar protic. Configuring a welding process with a molecular additive that is chemically similar to or chemically identical to the reconstitution solvent may be beneficial to the economics of the welding process as it may simply the equipment and/or energy and/or time required for at least the process solvent recovery zone 4, solvent collection zone 7, and solvent recycling 8. Additionally, as you raise the temperature of the reconstitution solvent and/or process solvent recovery zone 4, the time required for reconstitution may be greatly reduced, which may result in smaller overall length of the welding process and associated equipment, which may in turn reduce the complexity and/or variation in substrate tension and ability to control volume consolidation (as explained in further detail below).
Alternatively, a welding process may be configured with a reconstitution solvent makeup and temperature that yields a welded substrate having specific attributes. For example, in one welding process utilizing a process solvent comprised of EMIm OAc and a reconstitution solvent comprised of water, the temperature of the water may affect the attributes of the welded yarn substrate as described in further detail below.
E. Drying Zone
Reconstitution solvent may be separated from the substrate within the drying zone 5. That is, the reconstituted wetted substrate may be converted into a finished (dried) welded substrate in the drying zone 5. Although not required, in one aspect, the drying gas may flow in a direction opposite to the movement of the reconstituted wetted substrate so that the minimal amount of drying gas may be required while drying the reconstituted wetted substrate via removal of the reconstitution solvent using minimal time, space, and/or energy where applicable. Equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor and control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and/or flow rate of gas within the drying zone 5.
The drying zone 5 may be configured such that during the drying process step, “controlled volume consolidation” is observed in the substrate, process wetted substrate, reconstituted substrate, and/or welded substrate. “Controlled volume consolidation” as used herein denotes the particular way in which the finished welded substrate shrinks in volume and/or conforms to a specific form factor upon drying and/or reconstitution. For example, in one dimensional substrates such as a yarn, controlled volume consolidation can happen either as the diameter of the yarn is reduced and/or as the length of the yarn is reduced.
Controlled volume consolidation can be limited in one or multiple directions/dimensions by appropriately constraining at least the reconstituted wetted substrate during the drying process. Moreover, the amount and type of process and/or reconstitution solvent utilized, the method of process and/or reconstitution solvent application (including degree and type of viscous drag, etc.) can affect the degree to which a reconstituted wetted substrate will attempt to shrink upon drying. For example, in a 1D substrate (e.g., yarn, thread), controlled volume consolidation can be limited to only reduction of the diameter by configuring the draying zone 5 such that the substrate is subjected to an appropriate amount of tension during one or more steps of the welding process (particularly the process solvent recovery zone 4, drying zone 5, and/or welded substrate collection zone 6). In similar manner, in the example of a two-dimensional, sheet-type substrate, proper tension and pinning of the substrate at one or more steps of the welding process (particularly the process solvent recovery zone 4, drying zone 5, and/or welded substrate collection zone 6) can constrain the controlled volume consolidation to only effect substrate thickness and not change the area (length and/or width) of the substrate. Alternatively, the sheet-type substrate may be allowed to undergo controlled volume reduction in one or more dimensional directions.
Controlled volume consolidation may be facilitated and/or limited by specialized equipment in the drying zone 5 that holds the reconstituted wetted substrate as it dries in order to control the directionality by which the substrate shrinks or to force the finished welded substrate to physically comply with a particular shape or form. For example, a series of rollers that prevent a cardboard-substitute type product from shrinking along the length or width of the roll, but that allow the material to contract in thickness. Another example is a mold onto which a reconstituted wetted substrate may be pressed so that it may take on and hold a particular 3D shape as it dries.
In one aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, the drying zone 5 may be configured such that the reconstituted wetted substrate may experience a pressure less than ambient pressure, and may be exposed to a relatively low amount of drying gas. In such a configuration, reconstituted wetted substrate may be freeze dried. This type of drying may be advantageous for preventing or minimizing the amount of shrinkage that occurs as the reconstitution solvent sublimes.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure wherein the reconstitution solvent employed is benign (e.g., water), then the drying zone 5 may be omitted such that the reconstituted wetted substrate may move straight to collection. For example, reconstituted wetted substrate configured as yarn might be rolled up on a collection reel and then air dried after and/or during collection.
F. Welded Substrate Collection Zone
The welded substrate collection zone 6 may be the portion of the welding process where welded substrates (e.g., finished composites) are collected. In certain aspects of the present disclosure, the welded substrate collection zone 6 may be configured as a roll of materials (e.g., a coil of yarn, cardboard-substitute, etc.). The welded substrate collection zone 6 may employ saws or stamps that cut sheets and/or shapes from, for example, welded substrate configured as a composite extrusion. In an aspect, automated stacking equipment may be utilized to package bundles of finished composites. Additionally, in the example of a 1D welded substrate that is wound and packaged, the method of winding and packaging may be configured to affect one or more variables affecting the viscous drag of the welding process.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure configured for use with certain 1D substrates (e.g., yarn and/or similar substrates), it may be advantageous to employ an apparatus that may roll the welded substrate into a coil over a cylindrical or tube-like structure either immediately after the process solvent application zone 2 or immediately after the process temperature/pressure zone. The apparatus may be used to produce a three-dimensional, tube-like structure from a one-dimensional substrate prior to the substrate entering the process solvent recovery zone 4. In so doing, the substrate may conform to the new tube-like shape. It is contemplated that such an apparatus may be especially useful when employed in a welding process configured at least in part to produce functional composite materials from yarn substrates that contain functional materials (e.g., catalysts embedded within yarns) without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
In another aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure configured for use with certain 1D substrates (e.g., yarn and/or similar substrates), it may be advantageous to employ an apparatus that may knit or weave the substrate immediately after the process solvent application zone 2 or immediately after the process temperature/pressure zone 3. The apparatus may be configured to produce a fabric structure from the substrate prior to entering the process solvent recovery zone 4. Such an apparatus may be configured such that the welding process may produce 2D fabrics with unique properties that cannot be achieved through other means of manufacturing.
In yet another aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure configured for use with certain 1D substrates (e.g., yarn and/or similar substrates), it may be advantageous to employ an apparatus that may produce a coiled package of yarn (e.g., a traverse cam). Such an apparatus may be configured to roll welded substrate into coil-like packages that may be unwound at a later time without becoming entangled.
G. Solvent Collection Zone
As described above, process solvent may be washed from the process wetted substrate by the reconstitution solvent within the process solvent recovery zone 4. Accordingly, in one aspect the reconstitution solvent may mix with various portions of the process solvent (e.g., ions and/or any molecular constituents, etc.). This mixture (or relatively pure process solvent or reconstitution solvent) may be collected at an appropriate point within the solvent collection zone 7. In one aspect, the collection point may be positioned near the entry point of the process wetted substrate. Such a configuration may be especially useful for configurations utilizing counter flow of reconstitution solvent with respect to process wetted substrate due to the concentration of process solvent constituents within the process wetted substrate being lowest at a point wherein the concentration thereof in the reconstitution solvent is lowest. This configuration may result in less reconstitution solvent usage as well as ease separating and recycling the process and reconstitution solvents.
In the solvent collection zone 7, various equipment and instrumentation may be utilized to monitor and control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and flow rate of reconstitution solvent, process wetted substrate, and/or reconstitution wetted substrate.
H. Solvent Recycling
In an aspect, a welding process according to the present disclosure may be configured to collect the mixed solvent (e.g., part reconstitution solvent and part process solvent), relatively pure process solvent, and/or relatively pure reconstitution solvent may be collected and recycled. Various equipment and/or methods may be used to separate, purify, and/or recycle reconstitution solvent and process solvent. Any know method(s) and/or apparatus(es) or those later developed may be used to separate the reconstitution solvent and the process solvent, and the optimal equipment for such separation will depend at least on the chemical compositions of the two solvents. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is in no way limited by the specific apparatus(es) and/or method(s) used to separate the reconstitution solvent and process solvent, which apparatuses and/or methods may include but are not limited to simple distillation of a co-solvent and/or ionic liquid (e.g., the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,926), fractional distillation, membrane-based separations (such as pervaporation and electrochemical cross-flow separation), and supercritical CO2 phase. After the reconstitution solvent and process solvent have been adequately separated, the respective solvents may be recycled to the appropriate zone within the process.
I. Mixed Gas Collection
As previously described above, reconstitution solvent engaged with the reconstituted wetted substrate may be removed therefrom in the drying zone 5. In an aspect, either mixed gas comprised of a carrier drying gas with a portion of reconstitution solvent gas therein or reconstitution solvent gas may be collected from the drying zone 5. Equipment and/or instrumentation may be used to monitor and control at least the temperature, pressure, composition, and flow rate of gases collected.
J. Mixed Gas Recycling
As gas(es) are collected, they may be sent to equipment that separates and recycles either the carrier drying gas, reconstitution solvent, or both. In one aspect, this equipment may be a single or multiple stage condenser technology. Separation and recycling may also include gas permeable membranes and other technologies without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. Depending on the choice of carrier gas, it may be vented to the atmosphere or returned to the drying zone 5. Depending on the choice of reconstitution solvent it may be either disposed of, or recycled to the process solvent recovery zone 4.
Generally, a welding process configured according to aspects of the preceding description may be configured to convert a natural fiber and/or particle containing substrate into a finished, welded substrate in a continuous and/or batch welding process utilizing a substrate feed zone 1, process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, process solvent recovery zone 4, drying zone 5, and welded substrate collection zone 6. In certain aspects, it may be critical to monitor and control the amount, composition, time, temperature, and pressure of the process solvent relative to the substrate.
Referring to
Still referring to
In another aspect of a welding process depicted in
In a welding process according to the present disclosure wherein a carrier gas is used, the carrier gas may be recycled in a loop comprised of drying zone 5, mixed gas collection 9, and mixed gas recycling 10, after which the drying gas may again move to the drying zone 5.
For commercialization, recycling process solvent, reconstitution solvent, carrier gas, and/or other welding process components may be critical. Further, any loop for a process solvent, reconstitution solvent, carrier gas, and/or other welding process component may include a buffer tank, storage vessel, and/or the like without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. As described in further detail below, the specific choice of substrate, process solvent, reconstitution solvent, drying gas, and/or desired finished welded substrate may greatly impact at least the optimal welding process steps, order thereof, welding process parameters, and/or equipment to be used therewith.
In light of the foregoing description, it will be apparent that a welding process according to the present disclosure may be separated into discrete processing steps. For example, one welding process may be configured in the order of substrate feed zone 1, process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, and welded substrate collection zone 6, followed by storing or aging the process wetted substrate for some time and then at a later time performing the functions of the process solvent recovery zone 4 and/or drying zone 5. Again, in certain aspects one or more processing steps may be omitted (e.g., the drying zone 5 when water is used as the reconstitution solvent). Furthermore, in certain aspects of a welding process according to the present disclosure, some processing steps may occur simultaneously, or the end of one processing step may naturally flow into the beginning of another processing step as described in further detail below.
Referring now to
In an aspect of a welding process configured according to
Still referring to
Still referring to
In another aspect of a welding process depicted in
In a welding process according to the present disclosure wherein a carrier gas is used, the carrier gas may be recycled in a loop comprised of drying zone 5, at least one mixed gas collection 8, and mixed gas recycling 10, after which the drying gas may again move to the drying zone 5.
In an aspect of the welding process depicted in
It is contemplated that for certain welding processes, it may be advantageous to include one or more electronically controlled valves, drive wheels, and/or substrate guides (e.g., yarn guides that provide a new loose end or broken yarn end to be (re)threaded through an apparatus of a welding process with little or no human intervention). It is contemplated that a welding process so configured may reduce the both the amount of downtime for the welding process and the amount of human contact required for the welding process compared to a welding process not so configured.
In an aspect, a process solvent recovery zone 4 may be configured such that the process wetted substrate may be collected while reconstitution solvent is introduced to the process wetted substrate. For example, in a welding process configured to use yarn and/or thread as a substrate, a winding mechanism can be placed at the end of the process temperature/pressure zone 3. In an aspect, the winding mechanism can be enclosed such that as reconstitution solvent is introduced to the process wetted substrate (e.g., by spraying), the process wetted substrate may be washed continuously and converted into a reconstituted wetted substrate. Such a configuration can lead to a great simplification of the overall welding process in that the substrate need not run continuously from the process solvent recovery zone 4 to the drying zone 5. Instead, the reconstitution can happen more as a batch process, whereby a specific portion of substrate (e.g., cylinder or ball of yarn rolled into a continuous untangled entity) may be produced and reconstituted. At a certain point, the reconstituted wetted package can be transferred into a secondary reconstitution process and/or sent to the drying zone to remove the reconstitution solvent.
In another aspect, a welding process configured as a continuous process wherein the substrate may move continuously from the process temperature/pressure zone 3 to the process solvent recovery zone 4 to the drying zone 5. In such a configuration, the tension forces on the substrate may be additive, and can sometimes cause breakage, which may be highly problematic to the efficiency of the welding process. Accordingly, a welding process may be configured with rollers, pulleys, and/or other suitable methods and/or apparatuses to aid the movement of the substrate through the welding process to mitigate and/or eliminate breakage.
Additionally and/or alternatively, a welding process may be configured to reduce the amount of tension the substrate experiences during all or a portion of the welding process. In such a configuration, the substrate may move through a specified space in which reconstitution solvent may be applied to the process wetted substrate (e.g., via an applicator as described in further detail below) instead of moving the substrate through individual tubes (which also may be expensive and make rethreading more difficult). Such a configuration may be used with any substrate format, and it is contemplated that such a configuration may be especially useful for 1D substrates (e.g., yarns and/or threads) either alone or in a sheet-like configuration comprised of multiple individual substrates positioned adjacent one another and/or 2D substrates (e.g., fabrics and/or textiles). A process solvent recovery zone 4 so configured may mitigate and/or eliminate friction on the substrate and/or buildup of unnecessary tension, which may increase the throughput of substrate through the welding process.
Various aspects of the concept of viscous drag as it pertains to process solvent application are shown in
In one aspect of a welding process (either modulated or non-modulated without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims), the welding process may be configured to apply a process solvent via an injector. In one configuration of the injector, the injector may be comprised of a narrow tube with two inlets and one outlet. Substrate comprised of yarn (or other 1D substrate) may enter one inlet and process solvent may flow into the other inlet. The process wetted substrate (yarn with process solvent applied thereto) may exit the outlet. An injector may be comprised of additional inlets for adding functional materials, additional process solvent, and/or other components. As previously described above herein, the process wetted substrate (e.g., yarn, thread, fabric, and/or textile with process solvent applied) may be passed to the process temperature/pressure zone 3 after the process solvent application zone 2.
As shown in
One example of an injector 60 so configured may be comprised of a shell having T-shaped cross section, wherein a 1D or 2D substrate may enter and exit the injector through a relatively straight path. A process solvent may be pumped through a secondary input, which may be in a path generally perpendicular to that of the substrate. Such a configuration of an injector 60 is shown in
As shown in
When configured for use with a 1D substrate, the portion of the injector 60 from the substrate input 61 to the substrate outlet 64 may be configured like a tube. When configured for use with a 2D substrate, that portion of the injector 60 may be configured as two plates spaced from one another (similar to the apparatus shown in
A substrate outlet 64 may be engaged with a portion of the injector 60 generally opposite the substrate input 61. In one configuration of an injector 60, a substrate outlet 64 may be non-linear, as shown in
Alternatively, an injector may be configured such that it is Y-shaped, and/or one or more injectors may be configured with multiple stages to add process solvents, functional materials, and/or other components at specific locations and under specific conditions at one or more points during a welding process.
In one aspect, an injector may be utilized in conjunction with a yarn receiver, wherein both the injector and the yarn receiver may be configured to slide on a rail system and/or other suitable method and/or apparatus allowing selective placement of the injector and yarn receiver along one dimension. A welding process configured to allow selective manipulation of one or more injectors and/or yarn receivers in at least one dimension (e.g., by allowing them to slide along the length of a rail system) may reduce the time and/or resources required to re-thread yarn and/or thread at any point in the welding process (and in particular, through the process temperature/pressure zone 3) compared to welding processes without such selective manipulation, and may simultaneously enable a high(er) density of welding processes to be multiplexed within a relatively small space.
For example, in a welding process configured with ‘n’ number of yarns being processed simultaneously, only the outer yarns are relatively easy to access. In the event an individual yarn breaks, this can make rethreading difficult. By having a removable, track mounted injector at the start of the substrate feed zone 1, process solvent application zone 2, and/or process temperature/pressure zone 3, one (a person or automation) can easily remove the injector, and move it to the end of a group of substrates positioned in the welding process for rethreading. It is contemplated that for some applications it may be advantageous to configure the injector in a clam-shell design, but can also be an assembly of tubes without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. That is, the injector can be designed in a ‘clam-shell’ configuration wherein at least two pieces of material enclose a yarn or group of yarns. This allows yarn to be initially loaded into the welding process machinery more easily and also is amenable to designing systems that provide appropriate viscous drag for multiple ends of yarn simultaneously. As any particular injector is removed, the other injectors may slide down one position to close the existing gap and create a new gap that is positioned at one edge of the apparatus(es) for the welding process. Working in concert, a series of receiving units positioned at or near the end of any given process zone may also move accordingly, such that individual yarns move into each of their new positions, respectively.
The optimal configuration of a receiving unit may vary from one aspect of a welding process to the next, and may depend on at least the size of the substrate, process solvent used, and/or type of substrate used. In one aspect, a receiving unit may be comprised of a simple pulley or yarn guide that directs yarn into the process solvent recovery zone 4 and/or drying zone 5. In another aspect, receiving units can be significantly more complex (i.e., winding mechanisms) depending on how the welding process is configured, such as the configuration of the process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, process solvent recovery zone 4, and/or drying zone 5.
Another apparatus illustrating the concept of viscous drag as it pertains to process solvent application is shown in
Although the grooves 72 shown in
In one configuration, the spacing of the 1D substrates can be reduced to the point where many substrates essentially move together in a two-dimensional plan or a ‘sheet’ as further illustrated in
Generally, the process solvent may be continuously supplied to each groove 72 and/or a portion thereof such that as the substrate moves along the groove 72, process solvent is applied thereto so as to create a process wetted substrate. A groove 72 may be flooded with process solvent (in which configuration the groove 72 may function similar to a process solvent bath), and/or process solvent may be applied to a substrate adjacent a leading edge of the groove 72 and then properly wiped along an exterior portion of the substrate as the substrate moves toward a trailing edge of the groove. In one configuration of a welding process, a tray 70 may be angled with respect to the horizontal to utilize gravitational force on the process solvent, and the optimal angle may depend at least on the speed and direction of substrate movement with respect to the tray 70.
The optimal configuration of each groove 72 will vary from one application of a welding process to the next, and is therefore in no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims. When configured for multiple 1D substrates that are laterally spaced from one another by a distance equal to or greater than the average diameter of each substrate, it is contemplated that the width of a groove 72 may be approximately equal to the depth there, and each dimension may be approximately 10% greater than the average diameter of the substrate.
The optimal cross-sectional shape of each groove 72 may also vary from one welding process to the next. For example, in some applications it may be optimal for the cross-sectional shape of a groove 72 (or at least the bottom portion thereof) to approximate and/or match the cross-sectional shape of the substrate (or at least a portion thereof). For example, when configured for use with a substrate comprised of a 1D yarn or thread, a groove 72 may be configured with a U-shaped cross-section. When configured for use with a substrate comprised of a 2D fabric or textile, a groove 72 may be configured with a width much greater (e.g., 10 times, 20 times, etc.) than its depth. However, the specific cross-sectional shape, depth, width, configuration, etc. of a groove 72 is in no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
A configuration of a process solvent application zone 2 configured for use with a plurality of 1D substrates (which may be comprised of threads and/or yarns) approximating a 2D sheet is shown in
In another configuration, the viscous drag may be variable based at least on the relative positions of one or more structural components. For example, and referring specifically to
As described above relating to the concept of viscous drag and
Referring generally to
Referring now to
Conversely, as previously described, a welding process may be configured to yield welded substrates with consistent characteristics (e.g., coloration, size, shape, feel, finish, etc.) throughout by configuring the welding process to run very consistently without modulation of various process parameters (e.g., process solvent composition, process solvent to substrate mass ratio, temperature, pressure, tension, etc.).
In one aspect of a welding process configured for scaled production of welded substrates from multiple 1D substrates positioned adjacent one another (e.g., a sheet-like structure comprised of multiple yarns positioned adjacent on another), multiple ends of yarn can be moved as a sheet, which may provide improved economies of scale for some welding processes. The same concepts and principles regarding welding processes configured for 2D substrates (e.g., fabrics, paper substrates, textiles, and/or composite mat substrates) as disclosed herein may be applicable to multiple 1D substrates positioned adjacent one another.
By way of analogy, a welding process configured to weld multiple 1D substrates in a sheet-like configuration may be similar as to a welding process configured to weld a 2D substrate (e.g., a fabric and/or textile), but it is contemplated that the welding process for 1D substrates may have some important differences. Such differences may include, but are not limited to, accommodations (e.g., yarn guides) to mitigate and/or eliminate the likelihood of one substrate becoming entangled with itself and/or another substrate (e.g., individual yarns), and process solvent application may utilize either injectors for individual yarns or groups of yarns. Alternatively, a welding process may be configured such that no injector is required if process solvent is applied directly to the 1D substrates in a sheet-like configuration by spraying, dropping, wicking, dunking, and/or otherwise introducing process solvent in a controlled rate onto the sheet-like configuration. Accordingly, in accordance with the present disclosure various apparatuses and/or methods may be configured to yield a highly multiplexed welding process that scales to mass production.
A. Low-Moisture Substrates
Cellulosic (i.e., cotton, linen, regenerated cellulose, etc.) and lignocellulosic (i.e., industrial hemp, agave, etc.) fibers are known to contain significant (5 to 10% by mass) moisture. Moisture levels in, for example, cotton can vary from roughly 6 to 9% depending on the environmental temperature and relative humidity. In addition, IL-based solvents such as 3-ethyl-1-methylimidazolium acetate (“EMIm OAc”), 3-butyl-1-methylimidizolum chloride (“BMIm Cl”), and 1,5-diaza-bicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-enium acetate (“DBNH OAc”) are often contaminated with water either during syntheses and/or by absorption from the environment. Moreover, molecular component additives to the process solvent, such as acetonitrile (ACN) are also hydroscopic. Generally, the presence of water negatively impacts the efficacy of pure ionic liquids and IL-based solvents with molecular component additives to dissolve biopolymer substrates. However, it may be difficult and/or resource intensive to remove the last few percentage points (by mass) of water from these solutions. The cost of ionic liquids and IL-based solvents may be directly correlated with their purity, and in particular, with moisture content. Accordingly, a welding process may be configured to utilize low-moisture substrates to increase the performance of welded substrates as well as improve the overall economy of such a welding processes.
In addition to aiding welding processes using ionic liquid and IL-based process solvents, low-moisture substrate materials can also aid fiber welding processes that utilize N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (NMMO) as a process solvent as well. Generally, NMMO solutions that are 4% to 17% by mass water are capable of cellulose dissolution and may be utilized in Lyocell-type processes. Utilizing sufficiently dry biopolymer-containing substrate materials means that welding processes may be configured with process solvents having a water content at the upper end (˜17% by mass) and still efficiently and economically produce the desired welded substrate. In a welding process configured to use a process solvent comprised of ionic liquids that are moisture sensitive (e.g., 3-butyl-1-methylimidizolium chloride (“BMIm”) Cl, 3-ethyl-1-methylimidazolium acetate (“EMIm OAc”), 1,5-diaza-bicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-enium acetate (“DBNH OAc”), etc.), the amount of moisture in the substrate may affect the rate at which welding occurs, and therefore associated process parameters and apparatus design. In welding processes configured to use process solvents that are less moisture sensitive (e.g., NMMO, LiOH-urea, etc.) than certain ionic liquids disclosed above, the advantages of a relatively dry substrate are reduced and/or eliminated.
Accordingly, experiments have shown the surprising results of welding processes configured to use biopolymer substrates that have been artificially dried to low moisture states (<5% by mass) prior to welding. Low-moisture substrates may speed up the welding processes while simultaneously improving the quality (i.e., strength, lack of stray fiber, etc.) of welded substrates. Even more surprising is that water is removed from ionic liquids and IL-based process solvents by the strong desiccating nature of low-moisture biopolymer substrates. In one aspect, water may be removed from ionic liquids and IL-based process solvents that are reconstituted by non-aqueous media, for example, ACN. In fact, low-moisture substrates purify both process solvents and reconstitution solvents of water as they are continuously recycled through the fiber welding process.
Low-moisture substrate materials may be obtained by preconditioning materials in sufficiently dry (and sometimes warm, for example ˜40 to 80° C.) atmospheres for controlled time prior to being introduced into a welding process that utilizes a process solvent comprised of, for example, moisture-sensitive ionic liquid. It may be important that biopolymer-containing substrates be held in controlled climates prior to and during a welding process. Furthermore, intentionally introducing water to specific regions of space within a biopolymer substrate may serve to retards welding in that location and may allow for another method to modulate a welding process, several methods for which are described herein below.
Generally, experiments have shown that a welding process configured to utilize an artificially dry substrate (e.g., a substrate that has been dried prior to introduction into the substrate feed zone 1 and/or a substrate that is dried in all or a portion of the substrate feed zone 1) yields surprising new synergies that improve the economics of the welding process and/or the welded substrates produced thereby. For example, drying cotton substrates to less than 5% moisture by mass can dramatically improve the consistency and/or control of welding when utilizing BMIm Cl+ACN solutions (or other moisture-sensitive process solvent systems). Moreover, upon continuously utilizing dry cotton substrates and upon recycling the process solvent multiple times, experiments have shown that the water content of both process solvents (e.g., BMIm Cl+ACN) and reconstitution solvents (e.g., ACN) may be decreased so long as equipment is appropriately sealed from external water (e.g., water in the atmosphere). The desiccating nature of the dried cotton substrate increases as the moisture content decreases. In other words, cotton that is 3% by mass water is more desiccating than cotton that is 4% by mass water.
The foregoing description discloses attributes of various new materials (which materials generally are referred to as 1D welded substrates and 2D welded substrates) that may be produced using a welding process according to the present disclosure. The following attributes are novel and non-obvious in light of the prior art because these attributes are only present in the following materials when those materials are manufactured in large quantities (e.g., on a commercial scale). The material attributes may allow for manufacturing cost reductions in textiles as well as enabling new uses for natural substrate (e.g., cotton) containing textiles.
It is well known that petroleum-based materials (e.g., polyester, etc.) may be configured to produce both filament-type yarns and staple fiber yarns. As used herein, the term “staple fiber yarns” denotes yarns that are spun from fibers having relatively short, discrete lengths (staple fiber). However, prior to the processes and apparatuses disclosed herein, there was no filament-type yarn derived from natural staple fibers wherein the natural staple fibers (and, consequently, a filament-type yarn derived therefrom) retain a measure of their original attributes, structure, etc. of the staple fiber. The processes and apparatuses disclosed herein may be differentiated from all prior teaching regarding Rayon, Modal, Tencel®, etc. wherein manmade staple fiber is produced via full dissolution and/or derivatization of cellulose and then extruded (which full dissolution may be accomplished using NMMO, ionic-liquid based systems, etc.). In the cases of Rayon, Modal, Tencel®, etc., cellulosic precursors are fully dissolved and denatured in such a way that it is virtually impossible to determine the cellulosic source (e.g., beechwood tree pulp, bamboo pulp, cotton fiber, etc.) from which the staple fiber was derived. By contrast, welded substrates produced according to the present disclosure retain certain attributes, characteristics, etc. of the staple fiber in the substrate as described in further detail below. In retaining these native attributes, characteristics, etc., the present methods and apparatuses use a relatively small amount of process solvent per unit of welded substrate relative to the prior art, and even while enabling new functionalities (e.g., decreased water retention, increased strength, etc.) traditionally associated with synthetic and/or petroleum-based filament-type yarns. These new welded substrates and functionalities thereof, in turn, enable entire new fabric applications not possible with the prior art. The degree to which welded substrates express and/or exhibit these functionalities may depend at least on the configuration of the welding process used to manufacture the welded substrate.
Included within 1D welded substrates that may be manufactured using a welding process according to the present disclosure are non-plied ‘singles’ and plied yarns and threads as well as “welded yarn substrates.” Although the foregoing attributes and examples may be attributable to welded yarn substrates, the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited and the term “1D welded substrate” is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims.
Generally, welded yarn substrates are differentiated from conventional raw yarn substrates counterparts at least by: (1) the amount of empty space between the individual fibers that make up yarns, as welded yarn substrates are significantly more dense than conventional raw substrate counterparts having a mean diameter that is roughly 20% to 200% smaller than conventional yarns that have an equivalent weight of biopolymer substrate per unit length; and (2) welded yarn substrates do not generally have much if any loose fiber at their surface and thus do not shed (and the amount and characteristics of any loose fiber at their surface may be manipulated during the welding process). Specific empirical data for welded substrates and the corresponding natural fiber substrate are explained in detail below.
Generally, when loose fiber is present at the surface of a welded yarn substrate, at least some portion of the loose fiber is welded to the welded yarn substrate. That is to say, fiber is not really loose to be separated from the welded yarn substrate, but is instead anchored to a core of welded fibers within the middle of the welded yarn substrate. This may occur if the process solvent tends to migrate to the center of the substrate yarns during the welding process. However, the welding process may be configured to limit or promote welding within either the core or at the outside portion of a yarn substrate by varying at least the composition of process solvent and/or to adding multiple process solvent compositions at different times.
The two attributes listed above alone and/or in combination may be desirable/advantageous for a number of reasons. For example, a cotton yarn that does not shed can be knit with Spandex (also known as Lycra or elastane) or other synthetic fibers more efficiently because the amount of loose fiber (lint) is reduced and/or eliminated so that it does not cause problems with knitting machines. Lint and shedding is a known problem in the textile industry in that it causes imperfections in textiles and down time for equipment that must be cleaned and/or fixed because of lint build up. Static cling causes loose fiber to naturally adhere to synthetic fibers and is problematic. Welded yarn substrates significantly reduce these issues because shedding is eliminated and/or mitigated. Fabrics and/or textiles produced from a welded yarn substrate and Spandex (or Lycra, etc.) may be useful as active wear (e.g., shirts, pants, shorts, etc.) and/or undergarments (e.g., underwear, bras, etc.) without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
Welded yarn substrates may be manufactured such that they are stronger than their conventional raw substrate counterparts (of similar weight per unit length as well as per unit diameter). Welded yarn substrates can eliminate the need for “slashing” (or “sizing”) during the production of woven materials (e.g., denim). Yarn slashing is the process by which sizing (e.g., starch) is applied to a yarn (most often prior to weaving) in order to make it strong enough to undergo the weaving process. Upon a woven textile being produced, the sizing must be washed away. Yarn slashing not only adds expense, but is also resource (e.g., water) intensive. Slashing is also not permanent in that upon removal of sizing, yarns return to their original (lessor) strength. In contrast, the welding process may be configured to strengthen the resulting welded yarn substrate compared to conventional yarn such that slashing is not required, thus saving expense and resources while adding a more permanent improvement of strength.
Skew is a fabric condition in which the warp and weft yarns, although straight, are not at right angles to each other. This originates from the fact that conventional yarns are twisted during manufacture and therefore biased to untwist (unravel). Fabrics manufactured from welded yarn substrates may have the attribute that they skew much less aggressively than fabrics manufactured from conventional raw substrate counterparts because welded yarn substrates may have the attribute that they cannot untwist (unravel) after the welding process because individual fibers may be fused/welded.
Welded yarn substrates may convert low-twist yarns, yarns with shorter fiber length, and/or yarns produced from lower-quality fiber (e.g., fiber of different denier) into higher-value, stronger welded yarn substrates. For example, in conventional yarns, the twist factor is strongly correlated with strength. More twists per unit length costs more money. Low-twist yarn used as a substrate for a welding process according to the present disclosure may result in a welded yarn substrate that is much stronger than the conventional yarn substrate because of how the welding process may be configured to fuse individual fibers.
Welded yarn substrates can convert uncombed yarns into higher value, stronger welded yarn substrates. In conventional yarns, the combing process removes short fiber from sliver to yield higher strength yarn further down the manufacturing chain. Combing is machine and energy intensive and adds cost to the manufacture of yarn. Welded yarn substrates produced from a substrate comprised of sliver that was not combed may result in a welded yarn substrate that is much stronger than the conventional yarn substrate because the welding process may be configured to fuse short and long fibers to enhance strength. The welding process may be configured to produce stronger yarn at significant cost savings.
Textiles produced from welded yarn substrates may have that attribute that they hold their shape and do not have the tendency and/or propensity to shrink as much as fabrics manufactured from conventional yarns. Because a welding process may be configured to result in welded yarn substrates having significantly less (little to no) loose fiber at their surfaces compared to conventional yarn, textiles can be produced from the welded yarn substrates with a much lower fill factor than those produced from conventional yarn, and in ways that are akin to what is done with single filament synthetic yarns (e.g., polyester).
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a welding process configured to act on a 2D substrate (e.g., a welding process configured to produce a welded substrate similar to that shown in
Generally, the degree to which the substrate is welded (e.g., high, moderate, low) may affect the flexibility of the resulting welded substrate.
In addition to increased burst strength, fabric such as that shown in
Welded yarn substrates may have superior moisture wicking and absorption properties compared to conventional yarns, specifically conventional cotton yarn. As such, welded yarn substrates may dry more quickly than conventional yarns and thereby provide associated cost and resource reduction. Coupled with less tendency and/or propensity to shrink, fabrics constructed of welded yarn substrates may have much greater utility in activewear (e.g., sportswear), intimate apparel (e.g., lingerie), etc. where the combination of water management and lack of shrinkage are important attributes.
Textiles produced from welded yarn substrates may be configured to be much stronger for their weight compared with textiles produced from conventional yarns. Because the mean diameters of welded yarn substrates may be less than the mean diameters of conventional yarns for a given weight yarn, the burst strength of textiles manufactured using welded yarn substrates is observed to increase significantly.
Additionally, textiles produced from welded yarn substrates may be configured to allow wide variations and controllable results in the “hand” of the textile (e.g., feel, texture, etc.) and finish because a welding process may be configured to add a coating to the substrate and/or adjust the depth of process solvent penetration in the substrate. For example, in an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to coat a yarn substrate with solubilized cellulose as a film, which may greatly change the smoothness of the outside of the resulting welded yarn substrate as compared to the conventional raw substrate counterpart.
Included within 2D welded substrates that may be manufactured using a welding process according to the present disclosure are welded substrate cardboard, welded substrate paper-type, and/or welded substrate paper-substitute materials. Although the foregoing attributes and examples may be attributable to welded substrate paper-substitute materials, the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited and the term “2D welded substrate” is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims. Generally, the materials and/or attributes thereof for 2D welded substrates may allow for manufacturing cost reductions of paper-type and construction materials as well as enabling new uses for these materials compared to conventional materials.
Generally, welded substrate paper-substitute materials may be differentiated from conventional raw substrate counterparts at least by the fact that welded substrate paper-substitute materials may contain significant amounts (e.g., greater than 10% by mass or volume) of lignocellulosic materials. Conversely, conventional cardboard and other paper material contain refined cellulose pulp with little or no lignocellulosic materials. A welding process according to the present disclosure may be configured to produce a welded substrate paper-substitute material containing significant amounts of lignocellulosic materials. Lignocellulosic materials may serve as both low cost filler and/or strengthening (reinforcement) agents. These welded substrate paper-substitute materials may allow for differentiation within the paper and cardboard industry that is not presently observed. For example, low-cost thermal sleeves for coffee cups, pizza, and other food delivery/packaging boxes, boxes for shipping applications, clothing hangers, etc. These welded substrate paper-substitute materials may be transformative in that the cost of pulping (e.g., Kraft pulping) is eliminated. Two-dimensional and/or three-dimensional welded substrates may be useful in applications utilizing paper and/or cardboard by providing stronger, and/or lighter materials such as diapers, cardboard substitute, paper substitute, etc. without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
Some of the standard textile/fabric tests that have been used to verify and quantify the superior attributes of welded substrates compared to their raw substrate counterparts include, but are not limited to: (1) AATCC 135 (laundering test fabric); (2) AATCC 150 (laundering test garment); (3) ASTM D2256 (single end yarn test); (4) ASTM D3512 (pilling random tumble); and (5) ASTM D4970 (Martindale pill test). This list is not exhaustive, and other tests may be mentioned herein. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is not limited by the specific test and/or quantitative data for a particular raw substrate or welded substrate unless so indicated in the following claims.
What follows is data for welded substrates manufactured using various methods and apparatuses according to the present disclosure. However, nothing in the following specific examples (e.g., process parameters used for producing the various welded substrates, the attributes, dimensions, configuration, etc. of the welded substrate) disclosed below is meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims, and rather are for illustrative purposes.
One process for producing a welded substrate may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of EMIm OAc with ACN for application to a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn (‘30 single’, tex=19.69 weight yarn). A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of such a substrate is shown in
A schematic representation of a welding process is shown in
Table 1.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture the welded substrate in
Still referring to Table 1.1, “pull rate” refers to the linear rate at which the substrate moves through the welding process (which affects viscous drag), and “solvent ratio” refers to the mass ratio of process solvent to substrate.
Table 1.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
Another process for producing a welded substrate may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of EMIm OAc with ACN for application to a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn. A schematic of such a welding process is shown in
Table 2.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture the welded substrate in
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn that may be used with welding process of
Table 2.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
Another process for producing a welded substrate may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of EMIm OAc with ACN for application to a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn or 10/1 open end spun cotton yarn. Such a process may be analogous to that shown schematically in
Another process for producing a welded substrate may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of EMIm OAc with ACN for application to a substrate comprised of raw yarn. A perspective view of various apparatuses that may be configured to perform such a welding process is shown in
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a substrate that may be used with the welding process and apparatuses of
Note that this welding process may configured to move multiple ends of yarn substrate simultaneously, and that virtually all important process parameters such as process solvent flow rate, temperature, substrate feed rate, substrate tension, etc. may be adjusted. In particular, this welding process and apparatuses may enable the co-optimization of viscous drag and controlled volume consolidation for particular welded substrates designed for specific products. A selected number of welded yarn substrates are shown in
Table 3.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
Table 4.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture the welded substrate using the welding process and apparatuses shown in
Note that this welding process may configured to move multiple ends of yarn substrate simultaneously, and that virtually all important process parameters such as process solvent flow rate, temperature, substrate feed rate, substrate tension, etc. may be adjusted. In particular, this welding process and apparatuses may enable the co-optimization of viscous drag and controlled volume consolidation for particular welded substrates designed for specific products.
Table 4.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
Table 5.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture the welded substrate using the welding process and apparatuses shown in
Note that this welding process may configured to move multiple ends of yarn substrate simultaneously, and that virtually all important process parameters such as process solvent flow rate, temperature, substrate feed rate, substrate tension, etc. may be adjusted. In particular, this welding process and apparatuses may enable the co-optimization of viscous drag and controlled volume consolidation for particular welded substrates designed for specific products.
Table 5.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
A progression of the degree to which a substrate is welded is shown in
A test fabric produced from a lightly welded substrate (which welded substrate may be analogous to those shown in
Table 6.2 provides various attributes of the fabric comprised of three distinct samples of lightly welded substrates such as those from
In addition to increased burst strength, fabric such as that shown in
Another progression of the degree to which a substrate is welded is shown in
Generally, increased strength is observed for welded substrates as compared to their raw substrate counterparts. As previously discussed, the fabric shown in
Referring again to
The welded substrate shown in
This shell welded substrate may be manufactured from a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn utilizing the welding process and apparatuses shown in
Note that this welding process may configured to move multiple ends of yarn substrate simultaneously, and that virtually all important process parameters such as process solvent flow rate, temperature, substrate feed rate, substrate tension, etc. may be adjusted. In particular, this welding process and apparatuses may enable the co-optimization of viscous drag and controlled volume consolidation for particular welded substrates designed for specific products.
Table 8.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
By optimizing various process parameters (e.g., process solvent to substrate ratio, temperature, pressure, etc., and the resulting efficacy of the process solvent) and viscous drag, it is possible to control the depth to which the substrate is welded in a dimension from the exterior of the substrate to the interior thereof. That is, a welding process may be configured to preferentially weld the outer regions of the substrate such that the substrate core is not welded to the same degree as the exterior thereof. This has the effect of increasing strength compared to the raw substrate while also often retaining elongation properties of the raw substrate, and thus results in increased toughness (increased energy to break). Note that both core welded and shell welded substrates can display positive attributes such as faster drying, greater abrasion resistance, greater pilling resistance, more vibrant color, etc. when compared to their raw substrate counterparts.
A picture of a piece of fabric constructed from approximately 50% raw (not processed) cotton yarn substrate and 50% moderately welded yarn substrate is shown in
It should be noted that the relative lack of hair and reduction of empty space within fiber welded substrates is also responsible for the surprising and dramatic reduction of time required to dry fiber welded substrates. Again, the lack of hair at the substrate surface and reduction of empty space within the welded substrate by controlled volume consolidation may be configured to limit the extent to which bulk water can be integrated within the welded substrate. This is the reason why welded substrates often dry greater than twice as fast (half as much energy required) as raw substrates. Lastly, it is observed that the same coatings and surface modification chemistries that help reduce water retention in raw cotton are even more effective with fiber welded cotton substrates. Similar results are also observed for silk, linen, and other natural substrates.
Another process for producing a welded substrate may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of lithium hydroxide and urea for application to a substrate comprised of raw 30/1 ring spun cotton yarn. A perspective view of various apparatuses that may be configured to perform such a welding process is shown in
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a substrate that may be used with the welding process and apparatuses of
In other welding processes configured to use a process solvent comprised of LiOH with urea, the mass ratio of process solvent to substrate may be less than the value shown in Table 9.1. For example, in one welding process the ratio may be 0.5:1, and in another welding process it may be 1:1, in another welding process it may be 2:1, in still another welding process it may be 3:1 (which welding process and welded substrates produced thereby are discussed in detail below regarding at least Table 10.1), in another welding process it may be 4:1, and in yet another welding process it may be 5:1. Furthermore, the ratio may be values other than integers, such as 4.5:1. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is not limited by the specific value of this ratio unless so indicated in the following claims.
Table 9.2 provides various attributes of a welded substrate produced using the welding process and apparatuses of
A progression of the degree to which a substrate is welded is shown in
Moreover, the principles and concepts described regarding
It is apparent that properly co-optimizing various process parameters (e.g., process solvent composition for efficacy and viscosity, by engineering the appropriate viscous drag, temperature, and time of the process zone, rate through the drying zone, etc.) that the welding process can be controlled to achieve a similar effect as detailed in
An SEM image of a raw 2D substrate comprised of jersey knit cotton is shown in
It is important to note that having multiple process solvent chemistries gives a great amount of flexibility when adding functional materials and additives to welded substrates, as well as configuring a specific welding process to produce welded substrates exhibit the desired attributes. Ionic liquid-based solvents (e.g., a welding process and apparatus as shown in FIG. 9A), for example tend to be slightly acidic especially when the cation utilized is imidazolium-based. The alkali metal urea-type process solvents (e.g., a welding process and apparatus as shown in
As previously described, in an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, a substrate may be exposed to a process solvent for the purpose of subsequent physical or chemical manipulation of the substrate and/or properties thereof. The process solvent may at least partially interrupt intermolecular bonding of the substrate to open and mobilize (solvate) the substrate for modification. Although the foregoing illustrations and descriptions relate to functional material incorporation via a welding process feature substrates comprised of natural fibers, the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims.
As previously mentioned, one or more functional materials, chemicals, and/or components may be integrated within a welded substrate for 1D, 2D, and 3D substrates and/or welded substrates. Generally, it is contemplated that the incorporation of functional material may impart new functionalities (e.g., magnetism, conductivity) without full denaturation of biopolymers that would otherwise be deleterious to the performance characteristics (physical and chemical properties) of the substrate.
Generally, it is contemplated that the optimal integration of a functional material(s) within a welded substrate may require optimizing the viscous drag (which may be primarily associated with the process solvent application zone 2 and/or process temperature/pressure zone 3) and/or adjusting volume controlled consolidation, both of which concepts are described in detail above. For example, if it is desired for a functional material to be evenly distributed across an entire surface area of a welded substrate, the viscous drag may be configured to facilitate even distribution of a process solvent having a functional material disposed therein across the substrate. If it is desired for a functional material to be concentrated at a specific location on the welded substrate, the viscous drag may be configured to facilitate uneven distribution of such a process solvent. Accordingly, a welding process configured to integrate functional materials into a welded substrate may be optimized according to the concepts, examples, methods, and/or apparatuses as previously described above, and/or those described in further detail below.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, a substrate (which may be comprised of but is not limited to cellulose, chitin, chitosan, collagen, hemicellulose, lignin, silk, other biopolymer component that is held together by hydrogen bonding and/or combinations thereof) may be swollen by an appropriate process solvent capable of disrupting intermolecular forces of the substrate, and in addition, functional materials including but not limited to, carbon powder, magnetic microparticles, and chemicals including dyes or combinations thereof may be introduced either before, in conjunction with, or after the application of the process solvent(s). In an aspect of one welding process according to the present disclosure, fibrous biopolymer substrates, functional materials, and the process solvent (which may be an ionic-based liquid or “organic electrolyte” but is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims) may be allowed to interact under controlled temperature—which may include laser-based or other directed energy heating, as well as specific atmosphere and pressure conditions. After a prescribed amount of time, the process solvent may be removed. Upon drying, the resulting functional material may be bonded to the substrate and may provide additional functional properties to the welded substrate compared to the properties of the original substrate material.
The successful and permanent integration of functional materials into fibrous materials may be enabled by a welding process according to the present disclosure. Functional materials may be introduced with a process solvent and/or engaged with a substrate prior to the welding. Generally, in one aspect of a welding process natural fibers may be likened to an envelope into which functional materials may be placed, and once all or a portion of the empty space is removed during the welding process, the functional material may trapped. For example, in an aspect of a welding process the welding process may be configured to embed a devices into the middle of a yarn, such as a micro RFID chip. In another process, the functional material is disposed in a material that acts as a substrate binder. For example, a welding process may be configured such that fibers of the substrate may be coated with a dissolved substrate binder during the welding process.
In one aspect of a welding process, a process solvent may be both active towards the biopolymers in the natural substrate and also compatible with the functional material. In one aspect, functional materials may include another biomaterial integrated with the substrate material—one example of such a configuration is using dissolved chitin as an antibacterial material in cellulose, or as a blood coagulant in a wound dressing. From the preceding it should be apparent that the scope of the present disclosure is not limited by the specific substrate, process solvent, point in the welding process at which the functional material is introduced, method and/or vehicle for introducing the functional material, how the functional material is retained in the welded substrate, and/or type of functional material unless so indicated in the following claims.
The depth of solvent and/or functionals material penetration of the substrate and the degree to which substrate fibers may be welded together may be controlled at least by the amount of solvent, temperature, pressure, spacing of the fibers, form and/or partical size of functional material (e.g., molecules, polymers, RFID chip, etc.), residence time, other welding process steps, properties of substrate (e.g., moisture content and/or gradient) reconstitution method, and/or combinations thereof. After a period of time, the process solvent may be removed as previously discussed (e.g., with water, reconstitution solvent, etc.) to yield a welded substrate with incorporated (entrapped) functional materials, which may be retained via covalent bonding. In addition to polymer movement, chemical derivatization may also be undertaken during this process.
In one aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured to increase the material density (e.g., all or some of the open spaces between fibers may be removed) and decreases the surface area of a finished welded substrate comprised of a bundle of fibers compared to the material density and surface area of the substrate while simultaneously entrapping functional materials within the welded substrate. Generally, the degree to which the welding process affects the amount of empty space within a given substrate may be manipulated using at least the same variables as listed above regarding the depth of solvent and/or functional material penetration, which include but are not limited to the amount of solvent, temperature, pressure, spacing of the fibers, form and/or partical size of functional material (e.g., molecules, polymers, RFID chip, etc.), residence time, other welding process steps, properties of substrate (e.g., moisture content and/or gradient) reconstitution method, and/or combinations thereof. In another aspect, the welding process may be configured to control the specific region of a given substrate at which the empty space is being removed, which is described in further detail below. Again, functional materials may be added directly to the substrate (before welding), with the process solvent, and/or at any point in time before the process solvent is removed.
In one aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured to allow for spatial control of the alteration of the physical and chemical properties of the substrate using concepts similar to those of multidimensional printing techniques. For example, by adding process solution to substrates with a device similar to an inkjet printer or by heating selected portions of the substrate with directed energy beams (e.g., from an infrared laser or any other means known in the art) to activate welding in that selected portion. Such welding processes are described in further detail below related to
In one aspect of a welding process, the amount of process solvent with respect to the amount of substrate may be kept relatively low to limit the degree to which the substrate is modified during the welding process. As previously described, the process solvent may be removed either by a second solvent system (e.g., a reconstitution solvent), by evaporation if the process solvent is sufficiently volatile, or by any other suitable method and/or apparatus without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. A welding process may be configured to increase the evaporation rate of the process solvent by placing the process wetted substrate under vacuum and/or subjecting it to heat.
A welding process may be configured to produce welded substrates that may constitute “natural fiber functional composites” or “fiber-matrix composites” that exhibit functionalities (e.g., physical and/or chemical characteristics) not observed for the individual substrates and/or components that make up the welded substrate if observed separately prior to the welding process.
A welding process may be configured to produce welded substrates comprised of fiber-matrix composites that contain functional materials by utilizing a process solvent that is comprised of an ionic liquid-based solvent (“IL-based solvent”) as discussed in further detail below. One or more molecular additives in the process solvent may either increase the efficacy of the process solvent as a swelling and mobilizing agent, and/or enhance the interaction of process solvent with one or more of the functional materials, and/or enhance the uptake of the process solvent and/or functional materials into natural fiber substrates. IL-based process solvents are generally removed from welded substrate (which may constitute a fiber-matrix composite) by a reconstitution solvent, which generally involves rinsing/washing the process wetted substrate with a reconstitution solvent, which reconstitution solvent may be comprised of excess molecular solvent(s). Upon drying, (which may be accomplished by subliming, evaporation, boiling away, or otherwise removing reconstitution solvent(s) or any other suitable method and/or apparatus without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims) the welded substrate may constitute a fiber-matrix composite that is finished and includes functional materials with the associated novel physical and chemical characteristics.
The substrate may be comprised of natural fibers, which natural fibers may be comprised of cellulose, lignocellulose, proteins and/or combinations thereof. The cellulose may be comprised of cotton, refined cellulose (such as kraft pulp), microcrystalline cellulose, and the like. In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process and apparatuses associated therewith may be configured for use with a substrate comprised of cellulose in the form of cotton or combinations thereof. Substrates comprised of lignocellulose may include bast fiber from flax, industrial hemp, and combinations thereof. Substrates comprises of proteins may include silk, keratin, and the like. Generally, the term “natural fibers” as it relates to substrates herein is meant to include any high aspect ratio, fiber-containing natural materials produced by living organisms and/or enzymes. Generally speaking, use of the term “fibers” indicates attention to the macroscopic (large scale) viewpoint of a material. Other examples of natural fibers include but are not limited to flax, silk, wool, and the like. In one aspect of a welded substrate that may be produced according to the present disclosure, natural fibers generally may be the reinforcing fiber component of fiber-matrix composites. Additionally, natural fibers may be utilized in formats such as non-woven mats, yarns, and/or textiles.
While natural fibers typically are mainly composed of biopolymers, there are biopolymer-containing materials that are not generally regarded as natural fibers. For example, crab shells are mainly chitin, which is a biopolymer composed of N-acetylglucosamine monomers (a derivative of glucose) but is not generally referred to as fibrous. Similarly, collagen and elastin are examples of protein biopolymers that provide structural support in many tissues that are not generally considered as fibrous.
The natural fibers that are produced by plants are generally mixtures of different biopolymers: cellulose, hemicellulose, and/or lignin. Cellulose and hemicellulose have monomer units that are sugars. Lignin has phenol-based monomers that are cross-linked. Because of cross-linking, lignin is generally not able to be solubilized (e.g., swelled or mobilized) by IL-based solvents. Natural fibers that contain significant amounts of lignin can, however, serve as structural support fibers in composites. Additionally, natural fiber substrates that contain significant amounts of lignin may be swelled or mobilized using a process solvent that is not IL-based.
The natural fibers that animals produce are often composed of protein(s) biopolymers. The monomer units in proteins are amino acids. There are, for example, many unique silk fibroin proteins that make up silks. Wool, horns, and feathers are composed primarily of structural proteins classified as keratin(s). The natural fibers may include cellulose, lignocellulose, proteins and/or combinations thereof. Generally, “natural fibers” may include but is not limited to unless so indicated in the following claims cellulose, chitin, chitosan, collagen, hemicellulose, lignin, silk, and/or combinations thereof.
In an aspect of a welding process according to the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured to combine and convert a substrate comprised of natural fibers and functional materials into a welded substrate that is a contiguous fiber-matrix composite. One purpose of the welding process may be to combine and convert a substrate comprised of natural fibers and functional materials into a welded substrate that constitutes a natural fiber functional composite, herein also referred to as a “contiguous fiber-matrix composite” or simply “fiber-matrix composite.” Typically, functional materials are entrapped within the matrix portion of the fiber-matrix composite. A welding process may be configured such that natural fibers constitute the bulk of the fiber portion of welded substrate fiber-matrix composite and typically serve as the principle strengthening agent.
A. Ionic Liquid-Based Process Solvent Welding Processes
As previously discussed, a welding process may be configured to use a process solvent comprised of an ionic liquid. As used herein the term “ionic liquid” may be used to refer to a relatively pure ionic liquid (e.g., “pure process solvent” as defined herein above) and the term “ionic liquid-based solvent” (“IL-based solvent”) generally may refer to a liquid that is comprised both of anions and cations and may include a molecular (e.g., water, alcohols, acetonitrile, etc.) species and (the solvent mixture) may be able to solubilize, mobilize, swell, and/or stabilize polymeric substrates. Ionic liquids are attractive solvents as they are non-volatile, non-flammable, have a high thermal stability, are relatively inexpensive to manufacture, are environmentally friendly, and can be used to provide greater control and flexibility in the overall processing methodology.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,671,178, contains numerous examples of suitable ionic liquid solvents that may be used with various welding processes according to the present disclosure. In one welding process, the welding process may be configured to use an ionic liquid solvent having a melting point less than about 200° C., 150° C. or 100° C. In one welding process, the welding process may be configured for use with an ionic liquid solvent comprised of imidazolium-based cations with acetate and/or chloride anions. In another aspect of a welding process, the anions may include chaotropic anions including acetate, formate, chloride, bromide and the like alone, or in combinations thereof.
In another aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured for use with an IL-based solvent that may include polar aprotic solvents as a molecular additive, such as acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran (THF), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), acetone, dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and the like. More generally, the molecular additive for an IL-based process solvent system may be a polar aprotic solvent with a relatively low boiling point (e.g., less than 80° C. at ambient pressure) and relatively high vapor pressure. In an aspect, IL-based solvent may be about 0.25 mole to about four mol polar aprotic solvents per one mole of ionic liquid. In another aspect a polar aprotic solvent may be added to the IL-based solvent in ranges from about 0.25 mole to about two moles of total polar aprotic solvents per 1 mole of ionic liquid. Polar protic solvents (e.g., water, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol) are typically present in ranges less than one mole total polar protic solvents to one mole of IL-based solvents. In another aspect an IL-based solvent may include about 0.25 to about two moles of a polar aprotic solvent for each mole of ionic liquid.
In an aspect of a welding process configured for use with an IL-based solvent as a process solvent, the amount of IL-based process solvent added may be about 0.25 parts to about four parts by mass of the process solvent with one part by mass of the substrate.
In one aspect, a welding process may be configured to use an IL-based solvent comprised of one or more polar protic solvents, which polar protic solvents include but are not limited to, water, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and/or combinations thereof. In one aspect less than about one mole polar protic solvent may combined with up to about one mole of ionic liquid. A welding process may be configured to use an IL-based solvent comprised of one or more polar aprotic solvents (which may constitute a molecular additive to the process solvent system), which polar aprotic solvents include but are not limited to, acetonitrile, acetone, and ethyl acetate. Reasons for adding molecular additives to an IL-based process solvent include adjusting the efficacy of the process solvent as a swelling and mobilizing agent, and/or enhancing the interaction of the process solvent with functional materials, and/or enhancing the introduction of the process solvent and functional materials into the substrate(s). Such molecular additives may include, but are not limited to, low boiling point solvents that can both adjust efficacy of the IL as well as the rheology characteristics of the process solvent. That is, the molecular additive and relative amount thereof may be selected so as to result in at least the desired viscous drag and controlled volume consolidation.
Generally, molecular components alone are non-solvents for most of the biopolymer materials of interest. In one aspect of a welding process, the partial dissolution of biopolymers or synthetic polymer materials may be limited to instances in which there is an appropriate concentration of about one mole of ionic liquid (ions) present for up to about four moles maximum of molecular components. The molecular component may either reduce the overall ability for ionic liquid ions to solubilize, mobilize, and/or swell polymers in the substrate, or they may increase the overall efficacy of the IL-based process solvent, which may depend at least upon the hydrogen bond donating and accepting abilities of the molecular component(s).
Polymers present in biopolymer substrates as well as polymers in many synthetic polymer substrates are generally held together and organized at the molecular level by intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding. If molecular components decrease IL-based process solvent efficacy, these molecular components can be useful to slow welding processes and/or allow special spatial and temporal control not otherwise possible using pure ionic liquids. In one aspect of a welding process, if the molecular component increases IL-based process solvent efficacy, these molecular components can be useful to speed the welding process and/or allow special spatial and temporal control not possible using pure ionic liquids.
Additionally, in another aspect, molecular components can significantly lower the overall cost of a welding process, particularly the cost associated with the process solvent. Acetonitrile, for example, costs less than 3-ethyl-1-methylimidazolium acetate. Thus, in addition to allowing manipulation of the welding process for a given substrate, acetonitrile also may reduce the cost of the process solvent per unit volume (or mass) utilized.
When relatively large amounts of IL-based process solvents are introduced to substrates comprised primarily of natural fibers (for reference “large” as used herein denotes roughly greater than 10 parts by mass process solvent to every 1 part by mass substrate) and with sufficient time and suitable temperature, the biopolymers within the substrate can be fully dissolved. In the present discussion, full dissolution indicates disruption of the intermolecular forces (e.g., disruption of hydrogen bonding due to the action of the solvent) and/or intramolecular forces that may be necessary to preserve natural structures, features, and/or characteristics within the substrate. Generally speaking, it is contemplated that for many welding processes according to the present disclosure, it will be advantageous to configure the welding process such that it does not involve full dissolution of major amounts of biopolymers. In particular, full dissolution often degrades natural fiber reinforcements by irreversibly denaturing embodied natural biopolymer structure. However, in certain aspects of a welding process, such as when biopolymers are utilized as functional materials, it may be advantageous to fully dissolve the biopolymer material. In a welding process so configured, the amount of fully dissolved polymer (functional material) utilized may be typically less than 1% by mass relative to mass of IL-based process solvent utilized. Given the relatively small amount of IL-based process solvent that is added to natural fibers, any fully dissolved biopolymer materials may be minor components of the resulting welded substrate.
As native structure is lost, the natural material may lose its native physical and chemical properties. Accordingly, a welding process may be configured to limit the amount of IL-based process solvent added relative to a substrate comprising natural fiber. Limiting the amount of process solvent introduced into the substrate may in turn limit the extent to which biopolymers are denatured from their natural structures, and thus may preserve the natural functionalities and/or characteristics of the substrate, such as strength.
Surprisingly, a welding process according to the present disclosure may facilitate the creation of welded substrates comprised of functional structures, which may be produced via the controlled fusion/welding of fibrous threads, woven materials, fibrous mats, and/or combinations thereof with the addition of functional materials. The physical and chemical properties of the welded substrates may be reproducibly manipulated by rigorous control of at least the amount of IL-based process solvent applied, the duration of exposure to IL-based process solvent, temperature, the temperature and pressure applied during the treatment, and/or combinations thereof. One or more substrates and/or functional materials may be welded to create laminate structures with proper control of process variables. The surface of these substrates and/or functional materials may be preferentially modified while leaving some of the substrate and/or functional material in the native state. Surface modifications may include but are not limited to manipulation of the material surface chemistry directly, or indirectly by the incorporation of additional functional materials to impart the desired physical or chemical properties. The functional materials may include but are not limited to drug and dye molecules, nanomaterials, magnetic microparticles, and the like that may be compatible with one or more substrates.
The functional material may be in suspension, dissolved or a combination thereof in an IL-based solvent. The functional material may include but is not limited to conductive carbons, activated carbons, and the like without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. Activated carbons may include but are not limited to chars, graphene, nanotubes, and the like without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. In one aspect, the welding process may be configured for use with a functional material that may include magnetic materials such as, NdFeB, SmCo, iron oxide, and the like without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
In an aspect of a welding process disclosed herein, the welding process may be configured for use with a functional material may comprised of quantum dots and/or other nanomaterials. In another configuration of the welding process the functional material may be comprised of mineral precipitates, such as but not limited to clay. In yet another configuration of the welding process, the functional material may include dyes, which dyes include but are not limited to UV-vis absorbing dyes, fluorescent dyes, phosphorescent dyes, and the like without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. In still another configuration of a welding process according to the present disclosure, the welding process may be configured for use with a functional material comprised of pharmaceuticals, selected synthetic polymers (e.g., meta-aramid, which is also known as Nomex®), quantum dots, various allotropes of carbon (e.g., nanotubes, activated carbon, graphene and graphene-like materials), and may also include natural materials (e.g., crab shells, horns, etc.) and derivatives of natural materials (e.g., chitosan, microcrystalline cellulose, rubber), and/or combinations thereof without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
In one aspect, a welding process may be configured for use with a functional material comprised of a polymer. In such a configuration it is contemplated that it may be advantageous to select a polymer that is not a crosslinking polymer to achieve the desired functional properties. However, the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims. In one such configuration of a welding process the polymer may be comprised of a natural polymer or protein such as cellulose starch, silk, keratin, and the like. In one aspect of a welding process, polymer(s) constituting the functional material may be less than about 1% by mass of the IL-based process solvent. Additionally, various natural materials may be utilized as functional materials.
As previously mentioned, a welding process may be configured such that one or more functional materials are predispersed with the natural fibers of a substrate, which substrates may be in the form of non-woven mats and papers, yarns, woven textiles, etc. without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims. Alternatively, functional materials may be dissolved and/or suspended within IL-based process solvents prior to application of the IL-based process solvent on the natural fiber substrate. Upon swelling and mobilizing biopolymers in the natural fiber substrate(s), functional materials may be entrapped within the matrix of the resulting welded substrate, which may constitute a fiber-matrix composite.
The optimal values for the various process parameters will vary from one welding process to the next, and depend at least upon the desired characteristics of the welded substrate, the substrate chosen, the process solvent, the functional material, time the substrate is in the process solvent application zone 2 and/or process temperature/pressure zone 3, and/or combinations thereof. In one welding process it is contemplated that an optimal temperature for the process solvent (and consequently, a temperature for the process temperature/pressure zone 3) may be from about 0° C. to about 100° C.
A welding process may be configured so that the welding process comprises combining IL-based process solvent with the substrate for about one second to about one hour, or until the substrate is at least 1.5% saturated, between 2% and 5% saturated, and at least 10% saturated with the IL-based process solvent. Such a welding process may be configured so that the functional material may be mixed with the substrate at the same time as the IL-based process solvent and the substrate or subsequent thereto.
After adequate exposure to the IL-based process solvent and functional material, a portion of the IL-based process solvent may be subsequently removed from the process wetted substrate. In one aspect, the welding process may be configured such that the portion of IL-based process solvent is removed by rinsing with water, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran (THF), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), acetone, dimethylformamide (DMF), or any other method and/or apparatus suitable for the particular welding process without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
In an aspect, a welding process may be configured such that it entraps the functional materials within a natural fibrous substrate by partially dissolving either biopolymers or synthetic polymers with an IL-based process solvent. In one configuration of a welding process, the welding process may be configured for use with an IL-based process solvent that contains cations and anions and has a melting point below 150° C., and the IL-based process solvent may include a molecular component as previously discussed. However, the scope of the present disclosure is not so limited unless indicated in the following claims. The welding process may be configured to form ionic bonds between the natural fibers of a substrate and the functional material.
In one aspect of a welding process configured according to the present disclosure, one or more functional materials may be incorporated into fibrous substrate prior to introduction of IL-based process solvent for partial dissolution of the fibrous substrate. In another aspect, the functional materials may be dispersed within the IL-based solvent for partial dissolution of fibrous substrate(s). In in another aspect one or more functional materials may be dispersed within IL-based solvents. In still another aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to use heat to activate the partial dissolution of the natural fiber substrate and/or the functional material(s). In another aspect of a welding process, the functional material(s) partially dissolved may be biopolymers and/or synthetic polymers.
In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to produce a natural fiber functional composite by using a natural fiber substrate, an IL-based solvent, and a functional material. First, the natural fiber substrate may be mixed with the IL-based process solvent, and this mixing may continue until the natural fiber is appropriately swollen. Next, functional material may be added to the swollen natural fiber substrate and IL-based process solvent mixture. In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to apply a pressure and a temperature to the mixture for a period of time. Next, at least the pressure and removing at least a portion of the IL-based process solvent may result in a finished welded substrate configured as a natural fiber functional composite in one, two, or three dimensions.
In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to use less than four parts by mass process solvent to every one part by mass substrate, which mass ratio may be sufficient to interrupt hydrogen bonding in only the outer sheath of natural fibers of the substrate. The degree to which hydrogen bonding is disrupted and natural structures are denatured may be dependent at least upon process solvent composition, as well as the time, temperature, and pressure conditions during which natural fiber substrates are exposed to IL-based process solvents.
The extent to which swelling and mobilization of biopolymer occurs can be qualitatively and, in some cases, quantitatively accessed at least by x-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, confocal fluorescent microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and other analytical methods. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to control certain variables to limit the amount of cellulose I to II conversion that occurs as described in further detail below at least as related to
The mobilization of the outermost biopolymers in substrates comprised of natural fibers generally may be considered a characteristic of a welding process according to the present disclosure. Mobilized polymer may be swollen such that functional materials can be inserted and entrapped within the resulting matrix of fiber-matrix composites in the welded substrate. Because the primary mode of action of an IL-based process solvent may be to swell and mobilize biopolymers by disruption of hydrogen bonding, natural fiber substrates that contain relatively high amounts of lignin (roughly greater than 10% lignin) are not generally suitable to swell and mobilize with IL-based process solvents. These lignocellulosic natural fibers (e.g., wood fibers) can be incorporated as relatively inert fiber reinforcement, however, lignocellulosic fibers containing roughly greater than 10% lignin do not provide much in the way of cellulose or hemicellulose matrix. This is at least in part because the cellulose and hemicellulose biopolymers that would otherwise be swelled and mobilized by the IL-based process solvent are essentially locked within the cross-linked lignin biopolymer. As used herein, the term “mobilized” includes an action wherein the functional material moves from the outer surface of substrate fibers to merge with that from neighboring substrate fibers while material in the substrate fiber core is left in the native state. Upon swelling and mobilizing biopolymers and entrapping functional materials, IL-based process solvents are generally removed from the fledgling fiber-matrix composite welded substrate to be recycled.
As used herein, the term “reconstitution” is used to refer to the process by which process solvent(s) are rinsed/washed out of the process wetted substrate. This is typically accomplished by either flowing excess molecular solvent (e.g., water, acetonitrile, methanol) around and through the process wetted substrate or by soaking the process wetted substrate in a bath(s) of molecular solvent. The choice of reconstitution solvent depends on factors such as the type of biopolymers that compose the substrate as well as the composition for the process solvent and ease by which the process solvent can be recovered and purified for reuse.
After removal of the process solvent, the reconstitution solvent is typically removed. This may be typically accomplished by any combination of sublimation, evaporation, or boiling. Depending on the natural fiber substrate, choice of functional materials, and whether the substrate is physically constrained during all or a portion of the welding process, the substrate may undergo significant dimensional changes. For example, the diameter of yarns may be reduced by up to a factor of two as the empty space between individual natural fibers is consolidated to a continuous fiber-matrix composite in the welded substrate.
In aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that a portion of natural fibers in a substrate comprised of natural fibers is swollen about 2% to about 6% in diameter. More specifically, in an aspect of a welding process a portion of such natural fibers may be swollen more than about 3% in diameter.
In one aspect of a welding process, the mixture may be about 90% natural fiber substrate and functional material and about 10% IL-based process solvent by mass. Alternatively, the amount of IL-based process solvent added to the substrate and/or mixture of substrate and functional material may be about 0.25 parts to about four parts by mass of the process solvent with one part by mass of the natural fiber.
In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that the pressure in the process temperature/pressure zone 3 may be about a vacuum. Alternatively, the welding process may be configured such that the pressure in the process temperature/pressure zone 3 is about 1 atmosphere. In still another configuration, the pressure in the process temperature/pressure zone 3 may be between about one atmospheres to about ten atmospheres. As previously noted, the temperature and/or time that the substrate is exposed to the process solvent may also be controlled.
In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may include providing a substrate comprised of a plurality of natural fibers, providing an IL-based process solvent, and providing at least one functional material. A welding process so configured may include mixing the substrate IL-based process solvent and functional material in a prescribed sequence creating a chemical reaction that produces a welded substrate constituting a natural fiber functional composite with the functional material penetrating the natural fibers and a plurality of the natural fibers and the functional material both may be covalently bonded together. In one aspect of a welding process, at least the temperature, pressure and time of the chemical reaction may be controlled. A welding process may be configured to remove a portion of the process solvent, and it is contemplated that in certain applications it may be advantageous to remove a large portion of the process solvent, or substantially all of the process solvent.
In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that the prescribed process sequence introduces the functional material after the natural fiber substrate is mixed with the process solvent and the natural fiber substrate has achieved a swollen state. In one aspect of such a welding process, the IL-based process solvent may be diluted by a molecular solvent component, and wherein the partial dissolution process of the biopolymers or synthetic polymer materials commences after removal of the molecular solvent component (which removal may be accomplished by any suitable method and/or apparatus without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims, including but not limited to either evaporation or distillation).
In one welding process, a carbon-cotton-process solvent mixture may be used to create a welded substrate having a thin-coat carbon/cotton bond that, when exposed to cotton fabric in solution with the process solvent, binds the carbon to the cotton fabric.
In one aspect of a welding process the process solvent and natural fiber substrate may be blended to create surface tension characteristics that allow the functional material (such as conductive carbon) to move into the natural fiber substrate and/or form a thin coat of carbon functional material on the natural fiber substrate such as cotton. The examples that follow are illustrative of welded substrates and/or welding processes for which functionalization is accomplished. The following examples are not meant to be read in a limiting sense, but rather as illustrative of the broader concepts and welding processes disclosed herein.
B. Functional Material Entrapment
The following illustrative examples details a welding process by which one or more functional materials may be entrapped in a substrate comprised of a natural fibrous material, and in which and IL-based process solvent may be introduced after the functional material has been incorporated into the substrate. Again, the following examples are in no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims. In one embodiment of the present invention entrapment involves the incorporation of functional materials into fibrous substrates prior to introducing ionic liquid based solvents.
In one aspect of a welding process, all or a portion of the IL-based process solvent 30 then may be removed from the bonded functional material 21 and swollen natural fiber substrate 11 to yield welded fibers 40 with entrapped functional material 22 while simultaneously maintaining a plurality of the natural fiber substrate 10 functional characteristics and a plurality of the functional material 20 functional characteristics. Unless otherwise noted, any attribute, features, and/or characteristic described herein for a welded fiber 40, 42 may extend to a fabric, textile, and/or other article comprised of the welded fiber 40, 42.
In an aspect of a welding process, the welded fibers 40 may be a combination of covalently bonded functional material 21 and swollen natural fiber substrate 11. In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that the resulting welded substrate is comprised of cotton cloth functionalized with entrapped magnetic (NdFeB) microparticles as observed via scanning electron microscopy data. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured for functional material 20 comprised of demagnetized microparticles that may be incorporated as a dry powder into a natural fiber substrate 10 comprised of cloth matrices. Surprisingly, the welding process may entrap magnetic particles within the biopolymers of the natural fiber substrate 10 such that the magnetic particles are observed to be strongly held within the welded fibers 40 and cannot be removed even by aggressive laundering. In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that similar procedures to those described above have yielded similar advantages and/or results in yarns and non-woven, fibrous mat natural fiber substrates 10, including cotton and silk yarn matrices.
As discussed, the welding process described in the immediately preceding examples may be configured such that suspensions of the nanomaterial functional materials 20 were added to biopolymer natural fiber substrates 10 prior to exposure of either the functional material or natural fiber substrate 10 to the IL-based process solvent. Different molecular solutions such as aqueous or organic (e.g., toluene) may be utilized alone or in conjunction with an IL-based process solvent 30 depending at least on the surface chemistry of the functional material 20, which may be comprised of quantum dots. The surface chemistry of the nanomaterial functional material 20 (i.e., hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity) in conjunction with the natural fiber substrate 10 may strongly impact the final location and dispersion of nanomaterial functional material 20 within the resulting welded fibers 40.
Surface chemistry may be used as a strategy for self-assembly of natural fiber substrates 10 and functional materials 20 with an IL-based process solvent to create microfabrication of functionality within composite materials. For example, in one aspect of a welding process, quantum dots may be comprised of semiconducting materials that have size-dependent properties. Their surfaces can be functionalized to be compatible with different chemical environments for use in medicine, sensing, and information storage applications without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
C. Functional Material Entrapment from Process Solvent/Functional Material Mixture
The natural fiber substrate 10 and process solvent/functional material mixture 32 then may be combined as depicted in
In an aspect of a welding process, the welded fibers 42 may be a combination of covalently bonded functional material 20 and swollen natural fiber substrate 112. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that the resulting welded substrate is comprised of a functional material 20 comprised of a molecular dye entrapped within a natural fiber substrate 10 comprised of cotton paper (fibrous mat), wherein the functional material 20 may be dispersed in an IL-based process solvent 30 (to create a process solvent/functional material mixture 32) prior to application to the natural fiber substrate 10. During a welding process, biopolymers (including, for example, cellulose in natural fiber substrate 10 comprised of cotton paper) may be swollen such that the functional material 20 comprised of dye can physically diffuse into and become entrapped within the polymer matrix by covalent bonding. After the welding process, the dye may remain visibly entrapped within the polymer matrix.
In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that certain information and/or chemical functionality may be controllably fused into natural fiber substrates 10 in the resulting welded fibers 40, 42. Such welded fibers 40, 42 may have application at least to anti-counterfeiting features for paper-based currency, dyeing (colorfast) of clothing, drug delivery devices, and other related technologies. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured for use with a functional material 20 that may include molecular or ionic species able to be dispersed into IL-based process solvents 30 for incorporation into the natural fiber substrate 10.
Generally, the purpose of adding functional materials 20 may be application specific. For example, dyes with linkage chemistries that covalently bind with cellulose can be relatively expensive. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured to entrap lower-cost alternative dyes that do not have special linkage chemistry within the welded fibers 40, 42. Functional material 20 comprised of one or more dyes that are entrapped within what was once swollen and mobilized biopolymers (e.g., swollen natural fiber substrate 11, 112) are not washed out as easily and may be applicable at least to textile and/or bar coding/information storage applications. In other aspects, conductive functional materials 20 can be entrapped within welded fibers 40, 42 for energy storage applications. Entrapment of functional materials 20 comprised of magnetic materials may be pertinent to textile-based actuators. The entrapment of functional materials 20 comprised of pharmaceuticals and/or quantum dots may be relevant to medical applications. The entrapment of functional materials 20 comprised of clays is germane to enhanced fire retardancy. The addition of the biopolymer chitin as a functional material 20 may find application due to its known antibacterial properties. In short, the number of possible applications is extremely large. Functional materials 20 include but are not limited to clays, all carbon allotropes, NdFeB, titanium dioxide, combinations thereof and the like as appropriate to affect electronic, spectroscopic, thermal conductivity, magnetism, organic and/or inorganic materials having antibacterial and/or antimicrobial properties (e.g., chitin, chitosan, silver nanoparticles, etc.), and/or combinations thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is in no way limited to a specific functional material 20 and/or the specific application of the resulting welded substrate and/or welded fibers 40, 42 unless so indicated in the following claims.
In an aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured such that no special covalent linkage chemistry is necessary to securely entrap the functional material 20 of interest but rather the functional material 20 may be physically entrapped within the welded fiber 40, 42. In one aspect of a welding process, functional material 20 may be incorporated with high spatial control for encoding information or creating color fast dyes, more generally, for integrating device functionality. Multidimensional printing and fabrication techniques enable the layering of many types of functionality within a single material or object.
D. Functional Material Entrapment from Process Solvent/Functional Material/Polymer Mixture
As depicted in
As shown in
The process solvent/functional material mixture 32 mixed with the polymer 53 prior to application to the natural fiber substrate 10 is depicted in
In one aspect of a welding process, all or a portion of the IL-based process solvent 30 then may be removed from the process wetted substrate (which may be comprised of bonded functional material 21 and swollen natural fiber substrate 11, 112) to yield welded fibers 40 with entrapped functional material 22 and polymer 53 as shown in
In an aspect of a welding process, the welded fibers 40 may be a combination of covalently bonded functional material 21, polymer 53, and swollen natural fiber substrate 11. The polymer(s) may be comprised of biopolymers and/or synthetic polymers. In a welding process configured for use with certain polymers 53, additional polymers may act as both a binder (e.g., glue) as well as a rheological modifier to change solution viscosity. Additionally, such a welding process may allow additional spatial control over the final location of functional materials 20 within welded substrate. In one aspect of a welding process, the welding process may be configured for functional material 20 comprised of carbon materials and the natural fiber substrate 10 may be comprised of cotton yarn to yield a welded fiber 40, 42 that has been tested and verified as suitable for use as electrodes for high energy density supercapacitors in woven fabrics. These may be adapted to provide flexible, wearable energy storage devices.
A welding process may be configured to produce a welded fiber 40, 42 with a functional material 20 comprised of one or more conductive additives such as organic materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes, graphene, etc.) or inorganic materials (silver nanoparticles, stainless steel, nickel, including fibers coated with metals and metal oxides, etc.). Such welded fibers 40, 42 may exhibit enhanced conductivity characteristics, and when combined with an appropriate electrolyte (e.g., either gel, polymer electrolytes, etc.), these welded fibers 40, 42 (and/or fabrics and/or textiles produced therefrom) may be capable of performing electrochemical reactions and/or capacitive energy storage.
A welding process may be configured to produce a welded fiber 40, 42 with a functional material 20 comprised of capacitive additives (e.g., MnO2, etc.). Such welded fibers 40, 42 may exhibit enhanced energy storage characteristics when combined with an appropriate electrolyte including either gel or polymer 20 electrolytes.
A welding process may be configured to produce a welded fiber 40, 42 with a functional material 20 comprised of photoactive additives (e.g., TiO2, etc.). Such welded fibers 40, 42 may exhibit enhanced self-cleaning (e.g., in the case of a wide bandgap semiconductor such as TiO2) and/or ultra violet light resistance characteristics.
Other applications for welded fibers 40, 42 produced according to a welding process according to the present disclosure may include but are not limited to technologies ranging from anti-counterfeiting to drug delivery applications. Furthermore, the preceding list of functional materials is not meant to be exhaustive and/or limiting, and other functional materials may be used without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
As previously described herein above, a welding process may be configured to allow for a wide variety of welded substrate finishes (e.g., yarn finishes) to be produced from conventional substrates (non-fiber welded), which substrates may be comprised of yarn and/or textile substrates in certain configurations of a welding process. For example, a welding process may be configured as a modulated welding process via the use of a process solvent that is pumped with a controlled, variable and/or modulated rate and/or by moving the substrate (e.g., yarn, thread, fabric, and/or textile) through the welding process at a variable rate and/or by varying the process solvent composition, and/or by varying the temperature and/or pressure in the process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, process solvent recovery zone 4, by varying tension (e.g., of the substrate, process wetted substrate, etc.), and/or combinations thereof.
In one aspect a welding process may be configured to allow for specific and precise control of the ratio of process solvent relative to a substrate comprised of fibers such that the welding process may convert a controllable amount of the fiber within the substrate to a welded state. The ratio of process solvent relative to substrate may be optimized at least depending on the particular process solvent and characteristics of the substrate. For example, in a welding process configured to use process solvent mixtures such as an ionic liquids (e.g., 3-ethyl-1-methylimidizolium acetate, 3-butyl-1-methylimidizolium chloride, etc.) mixed with a polar aprotic additive (e.g., acetonitrile) might utilize a process solvent ratio ranging from one part by mass process solvent added to one part by mass substrate to four parts by mass process solvent added to one part by mass substrate. Another aspect of a welding process may employ a process solvent that is comprised of a cold alkaline (sodium hydroxide and/or lithium hydroxide) with urea solution having process solvent ratios ranging from two parts by mass process solvent to one part by mass substrate to more than ten parts by mass process solvent to one part by mass substrate. Table 11.1 gives process parameter examples that have been used successfully for fabricating welded yarn utilizing welding systems with a process solvent comprised of both an ionic liquid and with a process solvent comprised of an aqueous hydroxide solution. The parameters shown in Table 11, but which parameters are not limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
In one welding process utilizing a process solvent comprising a hydroxide and urea in aqueous solution, the hydroxide may be comprised of NaOH and/or LiOH. In a welding process, the hydroxide may be comprised of LiOH at between 4 and 15 weight percent and urea at between 8 and 30 percent. In certain applications it may be advantageous to configure the process solvent such that it is comprised of LiOH at between 6 and 12 weight percent and urea at between 10 and 25 percent. In still another application it may be advantageous to configure the process solvent such that it is comprised of LiOH at between 8 and 10 weight percent and urea at between 12 and 16 percent.
With regard to the temperature ranges specified in Table 11.1, note that temperature may be optimized for the specific composition of the process solvent system. Moreover, the temperature and composition of the process solvent system may be co-optimized together at least with the solvent application zone 2 hardware and/or process control software and/or apparatuses in order to achieve the desired amount and location of welding on the substrate. That is, fiber welding that either provides consistent welded substrate attributes or modulated substrate attributes. This may also be achieved by applying viscous drag were appropriate during solvent application as well as the process temperature/pressure zone 3.
As shown in Table 11.1 and described herein above, a process solvent system may be configured as a mixture of an IL liquid and a molecular additive. The mole ratio of IL liquid to molecular additive may vary from one welding process to the next, and may affect the optimal temperature of the process solvent system during application thereof to the substrate. For example, in a welding process configured to utilize a process solvent system comprised of 1 mol BMIm Cl to 1 mol ACN, the vapor pressure of ACN may result in difficult processing conditions to control (related to health and safety) if the temperature is raised above 120° C. (which is where the rate of welding may be optimal). As a result of this constraint, the welding temperature is set to a lower temperature (e.g., 105° C.) but then requires a longer duration (>30 seconds) at such temperature. By contrast, in a welding process configured to utilize a process solvent system comprised of EMIm OAc, the optimal temperature may be between 80° C. and 100° C. because the effectivity of the process solvent is higher than BMIm Cl and thus the welding time with EMIm OAc in this temperature range can be 5-15 seconds. Accordingly, the optimal temperature for at least the process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, and other steps of a welding process may vary from one application thereof to the next, and is therefore in no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
Referring now to Tables 9.1, 10.1, and 11.1 (all of which provide key process parameters for a welding process configured to use a process solvent comprised of an aqueous hydroxide), the optimal ratio of process solvent to substrate (on a mass or weight basis) may vary at least based on the substrate format type. For example, a welding process configured for use with a 2D substrate may have a ratio of 0.5 to 7, and some welding processes may be optimally configured at a ratio of approximately 3.7. A welding process configured for use with a 1D substrate may have a ratio of 4 to 17, and some welding processes may be optimally configured at a ratio of approximately 10. It has been observed that a ratio of approximately 10 or higher, and specifically a ratio of 17, results in a condition in which the process wetted substrate is beyond saturation with respect to the process solvent, such that excess solvent is present at the exterior of the process wetted substrate that is not absorbed by the substrate and/or process wetted substrate. However, the specific ratio for a welding process utilizing an IL-based process solvent or an aqueous hydroxide process solvent in no way limit the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
With regard to the values and compositions of process solvents shown in Table 11.2, note that the addition functional material additives allows for spatial modulation of welding and unique controlled volume consolidation. The addition of functional materials such as dissolved cellulose with the appropriate hardware and controls in the welding process may allows for the surprising effect of a shell welded yarn as previously described in detail above at least related to
Note as well that the type of reconstitution solvent and temperature thereof in conjunction with the different values described in Table 11.1 can also yield surprising effects on the controlled volume consolidation as the reconstituted wetted substrate is dried. An SEM image of a raw 1D substrate comprised of 18/1 ring spun cotton yarn is shown in
Table 12.1 provides various attributes of the raw substrate shown in
Table 13.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture both the welded substrate shown in
Table 13.2 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
Table 13.3 provides various attributes of the welded substrate shown in
In contrasting
Specifically, both the welded yarn substrate shown in
Still referring to
Generally, particular values of the solvent ratios within the ranges mentioned in the immediately above can be utilized to produce very consistent welded yarn for substrates comprised of yarn when the ratios are not varied, but rather held constant and so long as other critical variables such as temperature are also held constant during the welding process. In so doing the welding process may be configured to yield a welded substrate that exhibits a consistent amount of welding such that welded yarns may have a consistent amount of welded fiber along the length of the welded yarn.
Appropriate control of the dynamic process solvent ratio (herein defined as the ratio of the mass of process solvent relative to the mass of the substrate), the composition of the process solvent, the pressure and method by which the process solvent is applied yields novel effects. For example, proper dynamic control may be used in a welding process to yield a welded substrate with heather and/or space dye (multi-colored effect) appearance in which a welded substrate comprised of a yarn or textile may have a variable degree of coloration that may be due to the dynamic control of the welding process. Creating a heather and/or space dye effect may only be revealed upon dyeing and finishing if these textile manufacturing steps are accomplished after the welding process.
However, a modulated welding process is not limited to producing heather or space dye effects but also may be configured to produce “embossed” yarns having a variable diameter (with changing yarn weight, which is to say without needing a substrate of variable length and/or diameter) and any number of other unique effects that for which there do not yet exist textile industry terminologies to describe. The degree to which the effect is observed may also be a function of the yarn or textile substrate that is acted upon. For example, the type of spinning process (e.g., ring spinning, open end spinning, vortex spinning, etc.) that was utilized to produce a substrate comprised of a yarn may requires different welding conditions (e.g., different process solvent ratios and/or application methods) from one another.
A. Comparison of Modulated and Non-Modulated Welding Processes
One illustrative example of a modulated welding process will now be described and compared to a non-modulated welding process (such as previously described herein above). However, the foregoing illustration is not meant to be limiting in any manner, and accordingly the specific parameters thereof do not limit the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
In a non-modulated welding process, the welding process may be configured for a substrate comprised of 30/1 ring spun yarn, which substrate may be converted into an extremely consistent welded substrate with consistent coloration, consistent fell and finish, and consistent amount of visible exterior fiber ‘hair’ by operating the welding process consistently. For example, by configuring the welding process to utilize a stable process solvent to substrate mass ratio, steady yarn movement rate through the welding process, consistent temperature and pressure, etc. This welded substrate may also exhibit all of some of the welded substrate attributes previously described herein above.
Alternatively, if desired, a modulated welding process may be configured for a substrate comprised of 30/1 ring spun yarn to convert the substrate into a welded substrate comprised of a yarn that has a multi-colored heather or space dye appearance by dynamically varying certain parameters of the modulated welding process. This is a surprising and very useful result because the welding process can be automated to convert a substrate comprised of commodity ring spun 30/1 yarn (which is a generally uniform product produced at large scale) into a welded substrate comprised of welded yarn having a unique look, feel, and/or finish for a multitude of end uses and applications. In correlative modulated welding processes, the welding process may be configured for use with substrates comprised of heavier (including but not limited to Ne 18 yarn) and lighter (including but not limited to Ne 40 yarn) commodity and specialized yarns without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
Moreover, a modulated welding process is not limited to configurations thereof for creating specialized effects and finishes just with substrates comprised of yarns. For example, application of process solvents including but not limited to mixed inorganic solvents such as aqueous solutions of lithium and/or sodium hydroxide with urea can be applied to both substrates comprised of yarns and even to substrates comprised of an entire textile that has itself been produced from either conventional material (e.g., yarn that has not been through a welding processes) or welded substrates (e.g., welded yarn).
Treatment of fabrics using a welding process can be accomplished over a localized region or regions of a fabric or garment. For example, processes such as those used in inkjet and/or screen printing of process solvent can be a very useful method by which to accomplish area-specific welding processes for 2D and/or 3D substrates. Alternatively, a welding process may be configured to yield a 2D and/or 3D welded substrate of relative uniform characteristics over an entire piece of material or garment.
When a welding process is configured and employed with appropriate control of various parameters thereof (e.g., limited welding time, relatively low process solvent ratio, etc.), the welding process may yield welded substrates with improved strength and pilling characteristics of woven and knitted textiles compared to their conventional raw substrate counterparts without excessive welding of yarn junctions within textiles. Alternatively, a welding process differently configured (e.g., longer welding time, higher process solvent ratios, etc.), may yield a welded substrate comprised of a woven or knitted material with welded and/or partially welded yarn junctions in woven and knitted materials to provide much stiffer and/or more robust materials. An advantage of employing a welding process on a 2D and/or 3D substrate (e.g., fabric, textiles) compared to 1D substrates (e.g., yarn, thread) is that large amounts of materials be treated simultaneously. However, as previously described above, welding substrates comprised of yarn and/or thread prior to weaving and/or knitting may yield a number of manufacturing and performance synergies. The choice of when and how to apply a given welding process to a particular substrate is largely dependent on the type of intended outcome/end use application for the welded substrate, and is therefore in no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
In addition to the possibilities listed above, it is possible to configure a welding process to form the cross section of 1D (e.g., yarn and/or thread), 2D, and/or 3D substrates (e.g., fabric and/or textiles as applicable to either 2D and/or 3D substrates) and/or the components of the substrates (e.g., an individual yarn or thread of a 2D and/or 3D substrate) into shapes other than circular shapes or welded substrates having circular cross-sectional shapes. Possible shapes include but are not limited to flattened oval or ribbon-like shapes. This may be accomplished by configuring a welding process to utilize appropriately shaped dies and/or rollers positioned within the process solvent application zone 2, process temperature/pressure zone 3, process solvent recovery zone 4, drying zone 5, and/or combinations thereof.
Conventional yarns used as substrates normally yield welded substrates that exhibit cross-sectional shapes that are roughly circular after the welding process. Generally, this may be because potential energy may be minimized as capillary forces draw process solvent(s) toward the core of a yarn as fibers are welded/fused. A welding process may be configured to yield welded yarn substrates that have non-circular cross-sectional shapes by employing at least specific forming methods and/or apparatuses to manipulate the process wetted substrate and/or forming the reconstituted wetted substrate as it dries.
B. Modulated and Non-Modulated Welding Processes Using Spatially Controlled Heating and/or Spatially Controlled Process Solvent Application
Spatial control of adding chemicals to substrates (e.g., inkjet printing of ionic liquids) has been previously disclosed, such as in U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,388. The spatial control of a welding process may also be directly controlled at least by heat activation in selected regions within the substrate (to manipulate any characteristic and/or attribute of the resulting welded substrate as described in detail above), wherein a welding process may be configured as a modulated welding process using spatially controlled heating. IL-based solvents typically do not appreciably weld (modify) natural fiber substrates 10 at room temperature (about 20° C.) for time frames on the order of minutes. Typically, it may be advantageous to apply heat to activate and/or speed the welding process. This may involve heating the entire substrate to temperatures greater than about 40° C. for at least several seconds.
A schematic representation of a welding process that may be configured as a modulated welding process is shown in
As is evident by a comparison of
Referring now to both
Referring now to both
An image of a modulated welded yarn substrate that was produced via a modulated welding process wherein the flow rate of the process solvent was modulated (e.g., pulsed in a manner similar to that depicted in
An image of a fabric made from a welded substrate that has be subjected to a modulated welding process is shown in
After this modulated welded yarn substrate was knit into a fabric and dyed, the depth of color was found to vary with the degree of welding. This yielded the surprising ‘space dye’ or ‘heather’ effect evident from
As briefly mentioned above, a welding process may be configured to control the amount of cellulose I crystal that is converted to cellulose II crystal. Referring now to
Table 14.1 shows some of the key processing parameters used to manufacture three separate welded substrates, wherein the processing parameters for the first two rows may be employed with the welding process and apparatuses shown in
Referring now to
Although the welding processes described and disclosed herein may be configured to utilize a substrate comprised of a natural fiber, the scope of the present disclosure, any discrete process step and/or parameters therefor, and/or any apparatus for use therewith is not so limited so and extends to any beneficial and/or advantageous use thereof without limitation unless so indicated in the following claims.
The materials used to construct the apparatuses and/or components thereof for a specific process will vary depending on the specific application thereof, but it is contemplated that polymers, synthetic materials, metals, metal alloys, natural materials, and/or combinations thereof may be especially useful in some applications. Accordingly, the above-referenced elements may be constructed of any material known to those skilled in the art or later developed, which material is appropriate for the specific application of the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
Having described preferred aspects of the various processes and apparatuses, other features of the present disclosure will undoubtedly occur to those versed in the art, as will numerous modifications and alterations in the embodiments and/or aspects as illustrated herein, all of which may be achieved without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the methods and embodiments pictured and described herein are for illustrative purposes only, and the scope of the present disclosure extends to all processes, apparatuses, and/or structures for providing the various benefits and/or features of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
While the welding process, process steps, components thereof, apparatuses therefor, and welded substrates according to the present disclosure have been described in connection with preferred aspects and specific examples, it is not intended that the scope be limited to the particular embodiments and/or aspects set forth, as the embodiments and/or aspects herein are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Accordingly, the processes and embodiments pictured and described herein are no way limiting to the scope of the present disclosure unless so stated in the following claims.
Although several figures are drawn to accurate scale, any dimensions provided herein are for illustrative purposes only and in no way limit the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims. It should be noted that the welding processes, apparatuses and/or equipment therefor, and/or welded substrates produced thereby are not limited to the specific embodiments pictured and described herein, but rather the scope of the inventive features according to the present disclosure is defined by the claims herein. Modifications and alterations from the described embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art without departure from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Any of the various features, components, functionalities, advantages, aspects, configurations, process steps, process parameters, etc. of a welding process, a process step, a substrate, and/or a welded substrate, may be used alone or in combination with one another depending on the compatibility of the features, components, functionalities, advantages, aspects, configurations, process steps, process parameters, etc. Accordingly, a nearly infinite number of variations of the present disclosure exist. Modifications and/or substitutions of one feature, component, functionality, aspect, configuration, process step, process parameter, etc. for another in no way limit the scope of the present disclosure unless so indicated in the following claims.
It is understood that the present disclosure extends to all alternative combinations of one or more of the individual features mentioned, evident from the text and/or drawings, and/or inherently disclosed. All of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the present disclosure and/or components thereof. The embodiments described herein explain the best modes known for practicing the apparatuses, methods, and/or components disclosed herein and will enable others skilled in the art to utilize the same. The claims are to be construed to include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted by the prior art.
Unless otherwise expressly stated in the claims, it is in no way intended that any process or method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that an order be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possible non-express basis for interpretation, including but not limited to: matters of logic with respect to arrangement of steps or operational flow; plain meaning derived from grammatical organization or punctuation; the number or type of embodiments described in the specification.
Applicant NATURAL FIBER WELDING, INC., a corporation formed under the laws of Illinois and the United States of America, requests entry into the National Phase in the United States by and through this application which is based on PCT Patent Application, assigned serial number PCT/US2017/24351 filed on Mar. 27, 2017, which claims priority from U.S. provisional App. Nos. 62/313,291 filed on Mar. 25, 2016, 62/365,752 filed on Jul. 22, 2016 and 62/446,646 filed on Jan. 16, 2017, all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2017/024351 | 3/27/2017 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017/165891 | 9/28/2017 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114880 | Taylor | May 1871 | A |
| 1943176 | Charles | Jan 1934 | A |
| 3447956 | Johnson | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3510390 | Bjorksten et al. | May 1970 | A |
| 3711316 | Angliss et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 4187332 | Fouche | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4522934 | Shum et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4562107 | Daniels | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4586934 | Blalock et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4597798 | Kamata et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4622238 | Franz et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4705523 | Hussamy | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4832864 | Olson | May 1989 | A |
| 4926626 | Andonov | May 1990 | A |
| 4938832 | Schmalz et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4970156 | Avrameas et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5077414 | Arduengo | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5203943 | Nornberg et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5369861 | Ball et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378246 | Gurley | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5471720 | Ball et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5626952 | McAbee et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5679146 | Kalt et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683832 | Bonhote et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5714536 | Ziolo et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5747125 | Markulin | May 1998 | A |
| 5749923 | Olip et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5792399 | Meister et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5827602 | Koch et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5856513 | Ue et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5928380 | Winkler et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5951719 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6004358 | Kruger et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6042890 | Ruf et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6065277 | Foil, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
| 6123741 | Girbaud et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6180234 | Hashemzadeh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6258928 | Baird et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6376712 | Narizuka et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6451220 | Ziolo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6494925 | Child et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6613310 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6808557 | Holbrey et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6824599 | Swatloski et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6997962 | Alpert | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7097344 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7198695 | Kettenbach et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7253289 | Ren et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7472536 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7549281 | Kuwano et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7550520 | Daly et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7671178 | Phillips et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7731762 | Inagaki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7754002 | Maase et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7908894 | Ronchi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7913524 | Aurich et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 3030030 | Varanasi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 3038840 | Li | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 3044120 | D'Andola et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 8093160 | Tharpe, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110667 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8178629 | Sotzing et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182552 | Janssen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182557 | Argyropoulos | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187354 | Lim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8202379 | DeLong et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8464728 | Marshall et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8518319 | Scott et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8545770 | Viovy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8784503 | Costard | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8871054 | Sealey | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8871418 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9091021 | Heller | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9096743 | Qin et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9155251 | Chou et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9242023 | Krieg et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9359721 | Harris et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9573308 | Chou et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9587114 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9644290 | Yu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9745673 | Chou et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9745680 | Chou et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9868240 | Chou et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9920454 | Sutti et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9956927 | Kim et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10011931 | Haverhals et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10071345 | Berchtold et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10190242 | Chou et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10266986 | Haggquist | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10723849 | Kalb et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10836923 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 11085133 | Haverhals et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
| 20020010291 | Murphy | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115193 | Hsieh et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030059604 | Hattori et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157351 | Swatloski et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165445 | Malnou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233742 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040038031 | Holbrey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048541 | Offord et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077519 | Price et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050061457 | Skuratowicz | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123851 | Shinbori et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177960 | Alpert | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194561 | Davis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196671 | Paonessa et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285073 | Singh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288484 | Holbrey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060090271 | Price et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060118755 | Fujioka et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128996 | Vaultier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194197 | Spangler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241287 | Hecht et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006774 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093462 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112185 | Myllymaki et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161095 | Gurin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215300 | Upfal et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225191 | Scheibel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080023162 | Myllymaki et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104776 | Nusser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164440 | Maase et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080190013 | Argyropoulos | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227162 | Varanasi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241536 | Luo et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090022775 | Champ et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088564 | Luo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221813 | Moellmann et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319075 | Tian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100048829 | D'Andola et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100081798 | Balensiefer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100112646 | Balensiefer et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170504 | Zhang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100176354 | Costard | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196967 | Edye et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249432 | Siemer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287826 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100319862 | Rahman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009021 | Schools et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20120046244 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120088104 | Hashimoto et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120088291 | Vermeersch et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115729 | Qin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245336 | Daly et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120291773 | O'Connor | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130056165 | Kilpelainen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130087552 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130192489 | Cockcroft et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219635 | Schools et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140186579 | Botelho et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150053345 | Schroer et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150218748 | Chappell et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150274982 | Howland | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150275423 | Finley | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150299949 | Sutherland et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160082141 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160106160 | Carneiro | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160208430 | Duffy et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170038322 | Cobanoglu et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170051443 | Morrissey | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170183460 | Kalb et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170190850 | Haverhals et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20180105965 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180155857 | Schniepp et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180371644 | Chien | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190024263 | Jin et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190055675 | Haverhals et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190292683 | Sun et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190292722 | Lin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190381462 | Keller et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200079925 | Haslinger et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200087850 | Wu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200140574 | English et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200299869 | Gallo | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200313175 | Shin et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20210054567 | Flynn et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210101362 | Carlyle et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2943716 | Oct 2015 | CA |
| 1380110 | Nov 2002 | CN |
| 101476166 | Jul 2009 | CN |
| 101275293 | Jul 2011 | CN |
| 102409557 | Apr 2012 | CN |
| 102747504 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 103603123 | Feb 2014 | CN |
| 103114351 | May 2014 | CN |
| 103025934 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104024495 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104822875 | Aug 2015 | CN |
| 106120003 | Nov 2016 | CN |
| 106232895 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 109072542 | Dec 2018 | CN |
| 902427 | Apr 1955 | DE |
| 102006040075 | Mar 2008 | DE |
| 102015218510 | Mar 2017 | DE |
| 0780391 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 1222918 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1854786 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 2712955 | Apr 2014 | EP |
| 191412374 | Jul 1915 | GB |
| 448272 | Jun 1936 | GB |
| 2002290011 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003171144 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2003335887 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2005126872 | May 2005 | JP |
| 2007303033 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2008516106 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008248466 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2016132841 | Jul 2016 | JP |
| 201719190 | Dec 2017 | TR |
| 201132819 | Oct 2011 | TW |
| M541475 | May 2017 | TW |
| 1993003213 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| 1994020521 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 1995021871 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| 1996006593 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 2000032658 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0153600 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 2001081436 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2002059404 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| 2002079269 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2002100360 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 2002102586 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 2003041692 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003029329 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2003074031 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2002059404 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2004027897 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2005017252 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| 2006041480 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2006097571 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| 2006116126 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007005388 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007032022 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007063327 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| 2007032022 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007085624 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2007111605 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2008095252 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009024766 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009024766 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009105236 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2010056790 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010128049 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2012033973 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013079729 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2014049134 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2015097047 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2015167815 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2016044817 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| 2016067189 | May 2016 | WO |
| 2016188853 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2017025457 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| 2017050646 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| 2017097953 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| 2017192779 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2021015078 | Jan 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report, European Patent Office, App No. EP 17793295, dated Apr. 7, 2020. |
| Haverhals, et al, Natural Fiber Welding, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2010, 295, 425-430. |
| Haverhals, et al, Process variables that control natural fiber welding: time, temperature, and amount of iconic iquid, Cellulose, 2012, 19, 13-22. |
| Short Staple Fiber Definition, Introduction to Technical Textiles, Arete Materials, Jun. 6, 2018. |
| Gale et al, Directed Discovery of Greener Cosolvents: New Cosolvents for Use in Ionic Liquid Base Organic Electrolyte Solutions for Cellulose Dissolution, ACS Publications, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2016, 4, 6200-6207. |
| International Bureau, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter 1 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), dated Oct. 4, 2018, PCT/US2017/024351. |
| International Searching Authority/RU, International Search Report & Written Opinion, dated Apr. 18, 2019. |
| Cai et al, Unique Gelation Behavior of Cellulose in NaOH/Urea Aqueous Solution, Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7, 189-189. |
| Haverhals et al, Natural Fiber Welding, Macromolecular Journals, 2010, 295, 425-430. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentabity, dated Dec. 26, 2019, International Breau. |
| Luke M Haverhals et al: “Natural Fiber Welding”, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, Wiley VCH Verlag, Weinheim, DE, vol. 295, Jan. 1, 2010 (Jan. 1, 2010), pp. 425-430, XP007913214, ISSN 1438-7492, DOI: 10.1002/MAME.201000005. |
| Luo et al, New solvents and functional material prepared from cellulose solutions in alkali/urea aqueous system, Food Research International, 2013, 52, 387-400. |
| Ma et al, Green composite films composed of nanocrystalline cellulose and a cellulose matrix regenerated from functionalized ionic liquid solution, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011, 84, 383-389. |
| Qi et al, Properties of Films Composed of Cellulose Nanowhiskers and a Cellulose Matrix Regenerated from Alkali/Urea Solution, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10, 1597-1602. |
| Supplementary European Search Report, European Patent Office, dated Feb. 4, 2020. |
| Supplementary European Search Report, European Patent Office, PCT/US2017/017254, dated Oct. 9, 2019. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report, European Patent Office, dated Oct. 14, 2019. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report, European Patent Office, App No. EP 17793295, dated Dec. 2, 2019. |
| Definition of staple fiber by Complete Textile Glossary, Celanese Acetate, 2001 (Year: 2001). |
| Centexbel study results from project: “IL-Dyeing: Dyeing of textile materials in ionic liquids”, http://www.innovatienetwerk.be/projects/1797&prev=search. |
| Ferreira et. al., “Complete removal of textile dyes from aqueous media using ionic-liquid-based aqueous two-phase systems”, Separation and Purification Technology, 128 (2014) 58-66. |
| Fukaya, et al., Cellulose dissolution with polar ionic liquids under mild conditions: required factors for anions, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 44-46. |
| Hauser, Peter, Ph.D., Cationic Pretreatments of Cotton, Emerging Technologies and Trends in Garment Wet Processing Symposium, New Orleans, Oct. 2000. |
| Haverhals LM, et al., (2009) Ionic liquids in the preparation of biopolymer composite materials. ECS Trans 16 (49):129-139. |
| Haverhals LM, et al., (2010a) Natural fiber welding. Macromol Mater Eng 295:425-430. |
| Haverhals LM, et al., (2010b) Process variables that control natural fiber welding. ECS Trans 33(7):79-90. |
| Haverhals LM, et al., (2010c) Characterization of polymer movement in fiber welded cellulose composites. ECS Trans 33(7):91-98. |
| Haverhals, Luke M., et al., Natural Fiber Welding: Ionic Liquid Facilitated Biopolymer Mobilization and Reorganization, Ionic Liquids: Science and Applications, Chapter 6, pp. 145-166. Publication Date (Web): Dec. 18, 2012., Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society. |
| Haverhals, Luke M., et al., Process variables that control natural fiber welding: time, temperature, and amount of ionic liquid, Cellulose Feb. 2012, vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 13-22., Springer Netherlands. |
| Heinze et al, Effective preparation of cellulose derivatives in a new simple cellulose solvent, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 201, No. 6, 627-631 (2000). |
| Huddleston et al., Characterization and Comparison of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Room Temperature Ionic Liquids Incorporating the Imidazolium Cation, Green Chem., 3:156-164 (2001). |
| Husemann et al., N-Athyl-pyridinium-chlorid als Losungsmittel und Reaktionsmedium fiir Cellulose, 288-291 (1969). |
| ISA/RU, International Search Report & Opinion PCT?US2017/030926, dated Sep. 28, 2017. |
| ISA/RU, International Search Report and Opinion, dated Aug. 14, 2017, PCT/US2017/024351. |
| Kristy Jost, et al., “Natural Fiber Welded Electrode Yams for Knittable Textile Supercapacitors”, Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, 5, 1401286. |
| Luke M. Haverhals, et al., “Ionic Liquid Facilitated Introduction of Functional Materials into Biopolymer Polymer Substrates”, ECS Transactions, 2012, 50, 631-640. |
| Ngo et al., Thermal Properties of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids, Thermochimica Acta, 357-358:97-102 (2000), Woburn, MA. |
| Nishino et al., All-Cellulose Composite, Macromolecules 2004, 37, 7683-7687. |
| Pawlak K, et al., Blue natural organic dyestuffs—from textile dyeing to mural painting. Separation and characterization of coloring matters present in elderberry, logwood and indigo. Journal of mass spectrometry. May 2006;41(5):613-22. Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Warsaw, Poland. |
| Perrier et al., Reversible Additon-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Poylmerization of Methacrylate, Acrylate and Styrene Monomers in 1-Alkyl-3-Methylimidazolium Hexfluorophosphate, European Polymer J., 39(3):417-422 (2003). |
| Pu et al., Ionic liquid as a green solvent for lignin, J. Wood Chem. Technol, 27:23-33 (2007). |
| Ren et al., Synthesis of 1-Allyl-3-Methylimidazolium-Based Room Temperature Ionic Liquid and Preliminary Study of its Dissolving Cellulose, Acta Polymerica Sinica, 3:448-451 (2003) (abstract). |
| Ribeiro et. al., “Sustainable Textile Dyeing Alternative with Ionic Fluid”, 4th International Workshop Advances in Cleaner Production, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2013. |
| Stepnowski, Solid-phase extraction of room-temperature imidazolium ionic liquids from aqueous environmental samples, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 381:189-193 (2005). |
| Suarez et al., Synthesis and Physical-Chemical Properties of Ionic Liquids Based on 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium Cation, J. Chim. Phys., 95:1626-1639 (1998). |
| Sun et al., Complete dissolution and partial delignification of wood in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, Green Chem., 11:646-655 (2009). |
| Sun et al., Magnetite-Embedded Cellulose Fibers Prepared From Ionic Liquid, J. Mat. Chem., 18:283-290 (2008). |
| Swatloski et al., Dissolution of Cellulose with Ionic Liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124:4974-1975 (2002). |
| Swatloski et al., Ionic Liquids for the Dissolution and Regeneration of Cellulose, in Molten Salts XIII: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Trulove, P.C., DeLong, H.C., Mantz, R.A., Stafford, G.R., Matsunaga, M., Eds., The Electrochemical Society: Pennington, NJ, 19:155-164 (2002). |
| Uddin, Mohammad Gias, Indigo Ring Dyeing of Cotton Warp Yams for Denim Fabric, Chemical and Materials Engineering 2(7): 149-154, 2014, Horizon Research Publishing. |
| Visser et al., Task Specific Ionic Liquids for the Extraction of Metal Ions from Aqueous Solutions, Chem. Commun., 135-136 (2001). |
| CN Office Action, dated Feb. 11, 2022. |
| Mexican Patent Office, Official Action, dated Mar. 31, 2022. |
| Stale Cotton, “The differences between short and long staple cotton,” HomeGrown, Jun. 2018. |
| European Patent Office, Supplemental Partial European Search Report, dated Nov. 11, 2021. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190358913 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62446646 | Jan 2017 | US | |
| 62365752 | Jul 2016 | US | |
| 62313291 | Mar 2016 | US |
