Patent Grant
11648308
The content of the following submission on ASCII text file is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety: a computer readable form (CRF) of the Sequence Listing (file name: 165062000600SEQLIST.txt, date recorded: Sep. 16, 2021, size: 29,868 bytes).
The invention relates to treating or preventing anaemia in a subject, such as a mammal or human. In particular, the invention addresses moderate to severe anaemia. Additionally, the invention provides means for sparing administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to subjects.
Anaemia is a major disease impacting 25% of the global population, or more than 1.7 billion people, particularly pregnant women, neonates and children. More than 40% of anaemia reflect a malfunction in the homeostatic control of iron uptake, storage and recycling. This dysregulation is a consequence of a variety of chronic diseases including infection (e.g. HIV, hepatitis), inflammation (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), cancer and kidney disease. The enormous impact of diseases causing dysregulation of iron homeostasis can be seen in the USA where, of 40 million adults of >65 years of age, 10% suffer from anaemia and ⅓ of these are caused by chronic disorders.
Standards of care focus on blood transfusions and treatments with ESAs such as EPO or Aranesp® (Amgen, Inc).
Anti-Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6 (BMP6) antagonists, such as antibodies, are being developed for use in a method of treating or preventing anaemia (see, eg, WO2016098079, US20160176956A1).
The invention is based on the inventors' realisation that a combination therapy of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA can be used to treat or prevent anaemia, particularly moderate to severe anaemia (ie, indicated by a blood haemoglobin of less than 9.5 g/dL).
The inventors have found such combination to be surprisingly efficacious for treating anaemia such as ACD (Anaemia of Chronic Disease), inflammation or infection and have demonstrated that the combination therapy can produce maintenance and elevation of blood haemoglobin concentration that is statistically significant versus use of an anti-BMP6 antibody alone. Furthermore, such effects are surprisingly durable over weeks (even after a single dose of administered anti-BMP6 antibody). We believe that this has not been shown or suggested previously in the art.
Additionally, the combination therapy of the invention is useful for ESA sparing anaemia therapy, ie, enabling ESA treatment with lower than standard doses of ESA. This is useful in view of potentially harmful side-effects of ESAs. The invention also may be useful for anaemia therapy in subjects that are refractory to ESAs or have poor response to standard ESA therapy. The invention usefully can maintain blood haemoglobin outside a moderate to severe anaemia range and/or prevent decrease of blood haemoglobin to such a range. The invention, thus, is useful for reducing the need for iron or blood transfusion therapy.
As exemplified herein, the invention is useful for anaemia therapy in inflammatory disease settings and microbial infection settings.
To this end, the invention provides the following configurations 1-13:—
1. A method of maintaining a blood haemoglobin level of at least 10 g/dL in a subject, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject.
2. A method of preventing the blood haemoglobin level of a subject from decreasing to less than 10 g/dL, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject.
3. A method of raising blood haemoglobin to a level of at least 10 g/dL in a subject suffering from anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said anaemia is treated.
4. A method of treating or preventing moderate or severe anaemia in a subject, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said anaemia is treated or prevented.
5. A method of treating or preventing anaemia in a subject suffering from an inflammatory disease or condition, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said anaemia is treated or prevented.
6. A method of eliminating or reducing the need to administer iron or blood transfusion to a subject suffering from anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said need is eliminated or reduced.
In an example, one, more or all of labile plasma iron (LPI), enhanced LPI (eLPI) and non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) are reduced in the subject. In an example, one, more or all of labile plasma iron (LPI), enhanced LPI (eLPI) and non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) are reduced in the subject.
7. A method of treating or preventing anaemia in a subject suffering from a microbial infection, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject.
8. A method of reducing administration of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to a subject suffering from anaemia for treating anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and said ESA, wherein anaemia is treated in the subject.
9. A method of treating or reducing the risk of anaemia in a subject suffering from or at risk of anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and a low dose of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein anaemia is treated or the risk of anaemia is reduced in the subject.
10. A therapeutic regimen for treating or preventing anaemia in a subject suffering from or at risk of anaemia, the regimen comprising simultaneously or sequentially administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA to the subject, wherein
In an aspect, the antagonist comprises or consists of an anti-BMP6 antibody or fragment, the method comprising
Further exemplification is provided below by way or worked experiments and data.
Since iron is fundamental to all forms of life and has to be sourced from the environment, the availability and usage in the body is tightly controlled. A key regulator of iron homeostasis is a 25 amino acid peptide hormone called hepcidin. Hepcidin is produced by the liver and causes the main iron uptake and storage compartments, the duodenal enterocytes and macrophages, to retain iron by means of controlling expression of the iron transporter molecule ferroportin. Hepcidin itself is regulated by iron levels through a homeostatic control mechanism, following activation of the immune system during infection and/or inflammation as well as by erythropoiesis. Importantly, hepcidin levels are elevated in chronic inflammatory situations, infections and also certain cancers. Elevated hepcidin levels sequester iron in enterocytes, macrophages and hepatocytes thereby suppressing haemoglobin synthesis and erythropoiesis. This leads to anaemia despite the fact that iron storage levels are normal. Hepcidin gene expression is controlled by a soluble factor called BMP6 (bone morphogenetic protein 6). BMP6 is considered the master regulator, since in the absence of BMP6, cytokines alone (or other BMPs) are not able to overcome the deficit of a BMP6 signal. The inventors thus focused on BMP6 is a key drug target for controlling aberrant dysregulation of iron homeostasis in anaemia, eg, in anaemia of chronic disease (ACD).
BMP6 is a highly conserved soluble protein factor that is considered the “master” regulator of hepcidin production in mice and humans. Hence, administration of BMP6 to mice increases hepcidin levels and decreases blood and serum iron, while inhibitors of BMP6 do the opposite. In addition, knock-out of the mouse BMP6 gene or human mutations within the BMP6 pathway support a central role for BMP6 in controlling hepcidin and blood and serum iron levels. Furthermore, pre-clinical and clinical validation for targeting BMP6 comes from increasing available iron levels by administering an anti-BMP6 antibody to rodents or cynomolgus monkeys or BMP6 neutralization using HJV-Fc (FMX-8, Ferrumax Inc) in a Phase I study, respectively. Reference is made to Andriopoulos Jr. B, Corradini E, Xia Y, Faasse S A, Chen S, Grgurevic L, Knutson M D, Pietrangelo A, Vukicevic S, Lin H Y and Babitt. 2009. BMP-6 is a key endogenous regulator of hepcidin expression and iron metabolism. Nat. Genet. 41(4), 482-487; WO2016098079 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582.
Aspects of the invention are as follows, and these aspects (and any un-numbered paragraphs) are combinable with any other configuration, example, feature, aspect or Clause of the invention as described herein; an antagonist (eg, anti-BMP6 antibody or fragment) or ESA of the invention can be provided for use in (or can be used in) a method in the following aspects:—
In an example, the invention uses an anti-BMP6 monoclonal antibody (mAb) for mobilising endogenous iron stores and increasing haemoglobin synthesis and optionally also erythropoiesis. The invention, in one aspect, may reduce the need for simultaneous and prevalent use of intravenous iron or blood transfusions in ACD patients. Additionally or alternatively, the invention may reduce the dose for the underlying standard of care treatment with ESA (eg, EPO) or render ESA (eg, EPO)-non responsive patients (or those with low response) responsive to ESA co-administration with an anti-BMP6 antagonist. Additionally or alternatively, the invention may treat or prevent anaemia in patients whose anaemia is refractory or non-responsive to ESA standard of care. ESAs may be contraindicated in patients that have uncontrolled high blood pressure, or have had pure red cell aplasia (PRCA, a type of anemia) caused by receiving an ESA (eg, darbepoetin alfa, such as Arenesp®, or eg, epoetin alfa, such as Epogen® or Procrit®.
Thus, in one embodiment of the invention the subject (eg, a human) is
“Refractory” in relation to drug treatment, such as ESA treatment will be readily apparent to the skilled addressee, and for example means that the subject is ESA-resistant or a low responder to the ESA (ie, has a less than average response) and is not effectively treated for anaemia by the standard of care using an ESA.
ESAs are typically used to maintain haemoglobin at the lowest level that both minimises transfusions and best meets a patient's needs. As explained above, the invention in its various configurations, aspects, examples and embodiments is useful for ESA sparing anaemia therapy, ie, enabling ESA treatment with lower than standard doses of ESA. This is useful in view of potentially harmful side-effects of ESAs. Tables 1-4 provide relevant information in this respect.
In an example, the subject is a Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patient not on dialysis. In an example, the subject is a Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patient on dialysis. In an example, the subject is a chemotherapy patient (eg, receiving or having received chemotherapy treatment for cancer).
In an embodiment, the treatment or prophylaxis of the invention reduces in the subject the incidence or risk of one or more side effects listed in Table 2, eg, one or more of the “common”, “more common” or “very common” side effects.
In an aspect, the invention provides a method of reduced side-effect ESA therapy of a subject suffering from or at risk of anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said anaemia is treated or prevented. Optionally, the incidence or risk of one or more ESA side effects listed in Table 2 (eg, one or more of the “common”, “more common” or “very common” side effects) is reduced. In an example, the therapy is anaemia treatment. In an example, the therapy is anaemia prophylaxis. In an example, the anaemia is moderate or severe anaemia.
In an embodiment, the treatment or prophylaxis of the invention reduces in the subject the incidence or risk of one or more side effects listed in Table 3, eg, shortened overall survival and/or increased risk of tumour progression or recurrence wherein the subject is a breast, non-small cell lung, head and neck, lymphoid, and cervical cancer patient; or a cardiovascular or thromboembolic reaction, such as stroke.
In an aspect, the invention provides a method of reduced side-effect ESA therapy of a subject suffering from or at risk of anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein said anaemia is treated or prevented. Optionally, the incidence or risk of one or more ESA side effects listed in Table 3 (eg, shortened overall survival and/or increased risk of tumour progression or recurrence wherein the subject is a breast, non-small cell lung, head and neck, lymphoid, and cervical cancer patient; or a cardiovascular or thromboembolic reaction, such as stroke) is reduced. In an example, the therapy is anaemia treatment. In an example, the therapy is anaemia prophylaxis. In an example, the anaemia is moderate anaemia. In an example, the anaemia is moderate to severe anaemia. In an example, the anaemia is severe anaemia. In an example, the anaemia in the invention is anaemia from myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Aspects of the invention provide (i) and (ii)
(i) A method of reducing administration of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to a subject suffering from anaemia for treating anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and said ESA, wherein anaemia is treated in the subject.
(ii) A method of treating or reducing the risk of anaemia in a subject suffering from or at risk of anaemia, the method comprising administering an anti-BMP6 antagonist and a low dose of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) to the subject, wherein anaemia is treated or the risk of anaemia is reduced in the subject.
In examples of these aspects the ESA is
In examples the ESA is
In an example, the blood haemoglobin is raised to or maintained at a level of more than 10 g/dL.
In an example, the subject is an adult human. In an example, the subject is a paediatric human. In an example, the subject is a human CKD patient on dialysis treatment. In an example, the subject is a human having end-stage renal disease.
A therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of the antagonist and ESA are administered to the subject in the methods of the invention. In an example, the anti-BMP6 antagonist and ESA are administered to the subject no more than 10, 14, 21 or 28 days apart. For example, the anti-BMP6 antagonist and ESA are administered to the subject no more than 1 or 2 months apart.
Examples of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) are epoetin alfa, Epogen®, Dynepo®, Eprex®, erythropoietin, Darbepoetin alfa, Aranesp®, Epoetin beta, NeoRecormon®, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, Mircera® and Procrit®. In an embodiment, the ESA of the invention is any one of these or a combination of two or more of these.
In an example, the ESA comprises or consists of recombinant erythropoietin, eg, selected from the following table. Erythropoietin has a variety of glycosylation patterns giving rise to alpha, beta, delta, and omega forms:
epoetin beta:
Roche epoetin delta:
epoetin omega:
In an example, the ESA of the invention is selected from the group consisting of an alpha, beta, delta, zeta and omega form.
In an example, the ESA is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor, eg, roxadustat or FG-4592. HIF is the primary regulator of the production of red blood cells (RBCs) in the body and a potentially novel mechanism of treating anaemia. This novel mechanism of action is referred to as hypoxia inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors. HIF-PH inhibitors act by simulating the body's natural response to anaemia. This allows a controlled, adaptive stimulation of the erythropoietic system in the body. This activation of the whole system results in both increased red blood cell (RBC) production and improved stabilization of the bone marrow's iron supply, which ensures the proper incorporation of iron into haemoglobin necessary for such RBC production. This adaptive simulation is very similar to the natural response that is induced when a person ascends in altitude. At higher altitudes, low levels of oxygen circulating in the bloodstream lead to reduced HIF-PH activity in relevant cells in the kidney and liver. The reduced HIF-PH activity stabilizes and increases intracellular levels of proteins HIF1α and HIF2α (referred to as HIFα collectively). For most cells the stabilization of HIF2α is greater than that of HIF1α, which ultimately leads to an increase in erythropoietin (EPO) secretion and a subsequent increase in RBC production. HIF-PH inhibitors work by blocking the effect of the prolyl hydroxylase enzymes, which promote the breakdown of HIFα proteins. As the breakdown is inhibited, the level of these HIFα proteins increases in cells. These HIFs are the primary protein mediators that enable the body and all of its individual cells to adapt to changes in levels of oxygen. Both HIFα proteins are consistently produced and their levels in cells are adjusted by the activity of the HIF-PH enzymes, which target the HIFα proteins for degradation. HIF1α helps cells survive under very low oxygen conditions, whereas HIF2α helps cells and the body to adapt to modest changes in oxygen, such that would occur with a change in altitude from sea level to up to 7500 feet. When HIFα is stabilized, it travels to the nucleus of the cell, where it binds to the protein HIFβ. When bound together, they induce the genetic signal for the production of EPO and several other proteins. The HIF-PH inhibitors increase HIFα levels much in the same way that a reduction in oxygen increases HIFα levels by inhibiting the HIF-PH enzymes in the body. With continued stabilisation of HIFα (either by staying at higher altitude or by daily dosing of the HIF-PH inhibitor), the level of haemoglobin and RBCs will rise in order to increase the amount of oxygen circulating in the blood.
In an example, the antagonist is instead an anti-BMP6 antibody or an anti-BMP6 antibody binding fragment. An example of an anti-BMP6 antibody is MAB507, that is commercially available from R&D Systems (Monoclonal Mouse IgG2B, Clone #74219). Other suitable antibodies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, WO2016098079 and US20160176956A1 the disclosure of which (and explicitly the sequences of antibodies, variable regions and CDRs therein) are incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention as an anti-BMP6 antagonist.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a light chain variable region (LCVR) and a heavy chain variable region (HCVR), wherein the LCVR comprises the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) LCDR1, LCDR2, and LCDR3, and the HCVR comprises the CDRs HCDR1, HCDR2, and HCDR3, wherein the LCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 2, the LCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 3, the LCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 4, the HCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the HCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 6 or SEQ ID NO: 7, and the HCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 8. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a light chain variable region (LCVR) and a heavy chain variable region (HCVR), wherein the LCVR comprises the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) LCDR1, LCDR2, and LCDR3, and the HCVR comprises the CDRs HCDR1, HCDR2, and HCDR3, wherein the LCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 2, the LCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 3, the LCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 4, the HCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the HCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 6, and the HCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 8. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a light chain variable region (LCVR) and a heavy chain variable region (HCVR), wherein the LCVR comprises the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) LCDR1, LCDR2, and LCDR3, and the HCVR comprises the CDRs HCDR1, HCDR2, and HCDR3, wherein the LCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 2, the LCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 3, the LCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 4, the HCDR1 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 5, the HCDR2 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 7, and the HCDR3 is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 8. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 10 or SEQ ID NO: 11. In a further embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 10. In another embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 11. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 10 or SEQ ID NO: 11. In a further embodiment, the present invention provides an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 10. In another embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising an LCVR and an HCVR, wherein the LCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 9, and the HCVR is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 11. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a light chain (LC) and a heavy chain (HC), wherein the LC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 12, and the HC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 13 or SEQ ID NO: 14. In a further embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a LC and a HC, wherein the LC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 12, and the HC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 13. In another embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising a LC and a HC, wherein the LC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 12, and the HC is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 14. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising two light chains and two heavy chains, wherein each light chain is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 12, and each heavy chain is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 13. In an embodiment, the antagonist comprises or consists of an antibody that binds to human BMP-6 (SEQ ID NO: 1), comprising two light chains and two heavy chains, wherein each light chain is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 12, and each heavy chain is the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 14. The SEQ ID NOs are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,582, and these sequences are explicitly incorporated herein by reference for possible use in the present invention and for possible inclusion in one or more claims herein.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising an anti-BMP6 antagonist (eg, an antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof) of the present invention, and an acceptable carrier, diluent, or excipient. More particularly, the compositions of the present invention further comprise one or more additional therapeutic agents, eg, an ESA and/or an anti-inflammatory agent. Suitable anti-inflammatory agents can be antibodies or antibody fragments, eg, an anti-TNF alpha antibody (eg, adalimumab, Humira®, infliximab, Remicade®, golimumab, Simponi®, or trap (eg, etanercept or Enbrel®); or anti-TNFR antibody or antibody fragment, or an anti-IL6R antibody (eg, sarilumab, tocilizumab or Actemra®).
In an example, the anti-BMP6 antagonist, antibody or fragment binds to BMP6 with a KD of less than about 1×10−8 M, preferably, less than about 1×10−9 M as determined by common methods known in the art, eg, by use of a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor at 37° C.
“Effective amount” means the amount of an antagonist (eg, antibody) or ESA of the present invention or pharmaceutical composition of the present invention that will elicit the biological or medical response or desired therapeutic effect on a subject, mammal or human that is being sought by the researcher, medical doctor, or other clinician. An effective amount may vary according to factors such as the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and the ability of the antibody and/or ESA to elicit a desired response in the individual. An effective amount is also one in which any toxic or detrimental effect is outweighed by the therapeutically beneficial effects.
The terms “treatment,” “treat,” “treating,” and the like, are meant to include slowing or reversing the progression of a disorder, such as anaemia, moderate anaemia, severe anaemia or blood haemoglobin decrease. These terms also include alleviating, ameliorating, attenuating, eliminating, or reducing one or more symptoms of a disorder or condition (such as anaemia, moderate anaemia, severe anaemia or blood haemoglobin decrease), even if the disorder or condition is not actually completely eliminated. A subject or patient refers to a mammal, preferably a human with a disease, disorder or condition (eg, anaemia or at risk of anaemia) that would benefit from inhibition of BMP-6 activity. The term “preventing” is for example reducing the risk of a disease or condition, such as anaemia.
An ESA, anti-BMP6 antagonist antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, of the present invention, or pharmaceutical composition comprising the same, may be administered by parenteral routes (eg, subcutaneous, intravenous, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, or transdermal). Administration may be to a subject alone or in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and/or diluent in single or multiple doses. Pharmaceutical compositions, combinations or antagonists of the present invention can be prepared by methods well known in the art (e.g., Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 19th ed. (1995), A. Gennaro et al., Mack Publishing Co.) and may comprise or be combined with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents, or excipients.
In an example, the subject is suffering from moderate or severe anaemia prior to administration of the BMP6 antagonist and the moderate or severe anaemia is treated. In an embodiment, the subject is suffering from moderate anaemia prior to administration and after the treatment the subject has mild or no anaemia. In an embodiment, the subject is suffering from severe anaemia prior to administration and after the treatment the subject has mild, moderate or no anaemia. In an embodiment, after the treatment the subject has mild or no anaemia, and not moderate or severe anaemia. In another embodiment, after the treatment the subject does not have anaemia. In an embodiment, the subject has a blood haemoglobin level of less than 9.5 g/dL prior to administration and after the treatment the subject has a blood haemoglobin level of at least 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 g/dL.
Anemia is generally considered when haemoglobin concentrations fall below 11 g/dL for pregnant women, 12 g/dL for non-pregnant women, and 13 g/dL for men.
The severity of anemia is categorized by the following haemoglobin concentration ranges:
In an example, the level of haemoglobin is at or equivalent to a measurement at sea level.
In an embodiment, the subject is a human male, eg, an adult or infant. In an embodiment, the subject is a human female, eg, an adult or infant, eg, a non-pregnant female or pregnant female. I an example, the human is a dialysis patient. The infant may be a human that is >1 month old.
In an example, the method is a method of eliminating or reducing the need to administer iron or blood transfusion to a subject suffering from anaemia, Eg, for reducing the dose or dosing frequency of iron to the subject.
The invention may comprise simultaneously or sequentially administering the anti-BMP6 antagonist and ESA. In an example, antagonist and ESA are administered no more than 1 month, 4 weeks, 3 weeks, 2 weeks, 1 week, 10 days, 9 days, 8 days, 7 days, 6 days, 5 days, 4 days, 3 days, 2 days or 1 day apart. As exemplified herein, administration of the antagonist and ESA can be effective if no more than 7 days (eg, no more than one day) apart. In an example, the anti-BMP6 antagonist and ESA are administered to the subject no more than 10, 14, 21 or 28 days apart.
In an example, the ESA is administered 2, 3 or 4 times weekly. In an example, the ESA is administered 1, 2, 3 or 4 times monthly or in a 8 week period. In an example, the ESA (eg, epoetin alfa) is administered at a total dose of <3000, 2900, 2800, 2700, 2600, <2500, 2500, 2400, 2300, 2200, 2100, <2000, 2000, 1900, 1800, 1700, 1600, 1500, 1400, 1300, 1200, 1100 or 1000 units/kg per week. In another example, the ESA is administered 1, 2, 3 or 4 times monthly or in a 8 week period. In an example, the ESA (eg, darbepoetin alfa) is administered at a total dose of <15, <30, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6 or 5 mcg/kg per week.
In an example, the ESA and/or antagonist is administered to the subject intravenously or subcutaneously.
In an example, the anaemia is in a subject receiving or having received zidovudine treatment.
Optionally, any configuration of the invention is also for one or more of:—
In an embodiment, the invention is for regulating (eg, increasing) erythropoiesis in the subject.
In an embodiment, the subject is a human comprising BMP6 gene SNP rs111588693. This may be correlated with increased propensity for anaemia.
In an example, the anaemia is anaemia of chronic disease (ACD), such as anaemia of cancer, or anaemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Certain chronic diseases, such as cancer, kidney disease, and autoimmune disorders, can lead to ACD when overactive inflammatory cytokines cause dysregulation of iron homeostasis, reduction of erythropoiesis, and a decrease in the life span of red blood cells. Hepcidin has been identified as a key hormone involved in iron homeostasis; high levels of hepcidin have been associated with the iron restricted erythropoiesis seen in ACD. BMP-6 has been shown to increase hepcidin expression. In an example, the invention is for reducing or maintaining reduced hepcidin level in the subject.
Anaemia of CKD is anaemia that is an early and common complication in patients suffering with CKD. Anaemia of cancer is anaemia caused by haematological malignancies and some solid tumours; whereas, chemotherapy-induced (eg, immunotherapy-induced) anaemia is anaemia caused by the treatment of cancer patients with chemotherapeutic agents. Anaemia in CKD exacerbates diabetic neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, and retinopathy, among other conditions. Cancer-related anaemia is associated with an increased relative risk of death. Current treatment options for cancer-related anaemia are limited to blood transfusions, as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are only indicated for chemotherapy-induced anaemia.
In an example, the subject is suffering from a chronic disease, such as cancer (eg, a haematological malignancy or a solid tumour), kidney disease, an autoimmune disorder or chemotherapy-induced anaemia. In an example, the subject (eg, human) is suffering from CKD and one or more of diabetic neuropathy, cardiovascular disease and retinopathy.
In an example, the anaemia is hepcidin related iron restricted anaemia. In an example, the anaemia is iron refractory iron deficiency anaemia (IRIDA). In an embodiment, the IRIDA is caused by a defect in the TMPRSS6 gene of the subject, eg, wherein IRIDA is caused by a TMPRSS6 gene mutation (eg, a SNP, such as rs855791; rs2543519; rs2235324; or rs1421312).
In an example, the method is a method of treating or preventing Sjogren's syndrome in addition to or instead of treating or preventing anaemia.
In an example, the invention is for increasing blood iron level, serum iron level, reticulocyte count, red blood cell count, haemoglobin, and/or haematocrit in the subject (eg, in a human).
In an embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament. In a further embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment or prevention of anaemia, eg, moderate to severe anaemia. In another embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of anaemia of chronic disease. In another embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of anaemia of chronic kidney disease. In another embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of anaemia of cancer. In an embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of IRIDA. In a further embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of IRIDA, wherein IRIDA is caused by a TMPRSS6 gene mutation (eg, a SNP, such as rs855791; rs2543519; rs2235324; or rs1421312). In an embodiment, the present invention provides the use of an anti-BMP6 antagonist and an ESA for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome.
Clauses
Clauses of the invention are as follows, and these Clauses (and any un-numbered paragraphs) are combinable with any other configuration, example, feature or aspect of the invention as described herein; an antagonist (eg, anti-BMP6 antibody or fragment) or ESA of the invention can be provided for use in (or can be used in) an method in the following Clauses:—
In any Clause herein, in an example for the entire duration of said period Hb concentration is increased over baseline by at least 1 g/dl, eg, by at least 1.5, 2 or 2.5 g/dl. In an example, Hb concentration is no more than 11. 11.5 or 12 g/dl in the subject, eg, an adult male or female human.
Hb concentrations and MCH (see below) may be determined using one or more blood samples obtained from the subject. For example, as determined using a blood sample taken at the end of each week of said period (and the baseline determined using a sample taken at D0).
In any Clause herein, in an example the first dose of ESA is administered on D0
In any Clause herein, in an example during said period Hb concentration reaches an increase in the range from 1 to 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5 or 1.25 g/dl over baseline. For example the Hb concentration reaches an increase from 1 to 2 g/dl.
In any Clause herein, in an example the antibody or fragment is administered as a single dose on D0 to the subject, wherein the single dose is administered in one or a plurality of aliquots to the subject.
In any Clause herein, in an example an ESA dose is administered in each of (i) the 4-9th (eg, on the 7th) day, (ii) the 12-16th (eg, on the 14th) day and (iii) the 19-23rd (eg, on the 21st) day immediately after D0.
By “equivalent” here, it is intended that a plurality of aliquots of the ESA can be administered (eg, on the same day or sequentially), wherein the aliquots amount to a total dose of the ESA. In an example, the ESA is darbepoetin alfa or Aranesp® and a dose is in the range from 15 to 100 mcg (micrograms); or from 30 to 100 mcg. In an example, the ESA is epoetin alfa and a dose is in the range from 3000 to 30000 units (ie, units refers to International Units, also known as IU, UI, IE, ME, NE in various languages).
Generally herein, a dose (eg, of antibody, fragment or ESA) can be administered in one aliquot or a plurality of aliquots (eg, on the same day, simultaneously, within a 30, 1 or 24 hour window).
In an example, a total weekly dose of ESA (eg, wherein the subject is a human) is from 10 or 15 to 80, 100, 200 or 300 mcg (micrograms). For example, the total weekly dose is from 10 to 80; from 15 to 80; or from 30 to 80 mcg. For example, the ESA comprises or consists of darbepoetin alfa, epoetin alfa or any other ESA disclosed herein. In an example, each dose of ESA (or a weekly dose) is administered to the subject in the range from 1.5 to 2 mcg/kg ESA.
In certain configurations, the method relates to reducing or sparing the administration of ESA. In this instance, for example, a total weekly dose of ESA (eg, wherein the subject is a human) is from 1 to 20 mcg, eg, from 1 up to 15 mcg. In an example where there is ESA sparing or reduction, each dose of ESA (or a weekly dose) is administered to the subject in the range from 0.01 or 0.1 to 0.3 or 1 mcg/kg ESA, eg, from 0.01 to 0.3; or from 0.1 to 0.3; or from 0.01 to 1; or from 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg.
The mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) is the average mass of haemoglobin per red blood cell in a sample of blood.
Competition herein can, for example, be determined by SPR (eg, at 37 degrees C. at pH7.6 and optionally as a Fab); by ELISA; by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS); or in a homogenous time resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay. SPR may be carried out using Biacore™, Proteon™ or another standard SPR technique. In one embodiment, competition is determined by ForteBio Octet® Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) such techniques being readily apparent to the skilled person.
In an alternative, the reference antibody is any anti-BMP6 antibody disclosed in WO2016098079 (the sequences and disclosure relating to such antibodies being incorporated herein for potential use in the present invention).
Additionally or alternatively, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to a further sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 7-19. Said further sequence can be used as a peptide per se, part of a larger peptide (eg, comprising SEQ ID NO: 6) or part of a BMP6 protein (eg, a wild type human BMP6 or recombinantly produced BMP6, eg, comprising SEQ ID NO: 6). For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 7. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 8. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 9. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 10. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 11. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 12. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 13. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 14. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 15. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 16. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 17. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 18. For example, the antibody or fragment competes with said reference antibody for binding to SEQ ID NO: 19.
Optionally the antibody or fragment binds to BMP6 with a stronger affinity than to each of BMP2, 4, 5 and 9.
In an example, the antibody (eg, as a Fab) or fragment has an affinity (KD) for binding BMP6 of
In an example, the KD is (or is about) 5-15 pM (eg, 10 pM). In an example, the KD is (or is about) 2-5 nM (eg, 3 nM). In an example, the KD is (or is about) 100-400 pM (eg, 140 or 390 pM).
In an example, the antibody (eg, as a Fab) or fragment has an off-rate (Koff) for binding BMP6 of
In an example, the Koff is (or is about) 5×10−4 S−1 (eg, when the KD is (or is about) from 2 nM to 400 pM; when the KD is (or is about) 2-5 nM (eg, 3 nM); or when the KD is (or is about) 100-400 pM (eg, 140 or 390 pM)). In an example, the Koff is (or is about) 3×10−5 S−1 (eg, when the KD is (or is about) from 5-15 pM (eg, 10 pM)).
In an example, the antibody (eg, as a Fab) or fragment has an on-rate (Kon) for binding BMP6 of
In an example, the Kon is (or is about) 1 or 2×10−5 M−1S−1 (eg, when the KD is 2-5 nM (eg, 3 nM)). In an example, the Kon is (or is about) 1-4, 1, 2, 3 or 4×10−6 M−1S−1 (eg, when the KD is (or is about) from 5-400 pM (eg, 140 or 390 pM) or 5-15 pM (eg, 10 pM)).
Optionally, in part I the heavy chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 and the light chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3. Optionally, in part I the heavy chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 and the light chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3. Optionally, in part II the heavy chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 and the light chains consist of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5.
In an example (as per the antibody used in Example 2 below), in part (d) the anti-BMP6 antibody of the invention is an antibody that competes with a reference antibody of part I or part II in an HTRF assay. For example, wherein in the HTRF assay the antibody of the invention is a labelled antibody that is pre-incubated with human BMP6 and subsequently combined with unlabelled reference antibody (according to part I or II), wherein competition between the antibodies is detected by the assay. In an example, the assay uses AlexaFluor™ 647 labelled antibody of the invention. In an alternative, the human BMP6 is labelled (eg, with AlexaFluor™ 647, the test antibody is labelled with biotin for binding to Eu3+cryptate-streptavidin, and the reference antibody is unlabelled).
Optionally, the anti-BMP6 antibody of the invention (test antibody) competes in an HTRF assay with the reference antibody for binding human BMP6 (or binds the same epitope of human BMP6 as the reference antibody), wherein the assay uses a directly or indirectly labelled test antibody directly or indirectly labelled with a donor (such as for example Eu3+cryptate) or an acceptor fluorophore (such as for example AlexaFluor™ 647) and a target BMP6 labelled with either a donor or acceptor fluorophore to enable energy transfer between donor and acceptor, whereby a fluorescence signal is produced and detected. In an example, where AlexaFluor™ 647 labelling is used, competition is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal at 665 nM of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody. Optionally, the reduction in signal at 665 nM is at least 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90%.
Optionally, the anti-BMP6 antibody (test antibody) is one that competes in a HTRF assay with a reference antibody for binding human BMP6 (or binds the same epitope of human BMP6 as the reference antibody), wherein the reference antibody comprises heavy chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2, and light chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the assay uses the test antibody directly or indirectly labelled with a donor label (such as for example Eu3+cryptate) or an acceptor fluorophore label (such as for example AlexaFluor™ 647) and a human BMP6 labelled with either an acceptor fluorophore or donor respectively to enable energy transfer between donor and acceptor, wherein said competition between the antibodies is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody. For example, the test antibody is directly or indirectly labelled with AlexaFluor™ 647 and competition is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal at 665 nM of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody. Optionally, the reduction in signal at 665 nM is at least 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90%.
Optionally, the anti-BMP6 antibody (test antibody) also competes in an HTRF assay with a reference antibody for binding human BMP6 (or binds the same epitope of human BMP6 as the reference antibody), wherein the reference antibody comprises heavy chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, and light chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5, wherein the assay for example uses the test antibody directly or indirectly labelled with a donor label (such as for example Eu3+cryptate) or an acceptor fluorophore label (such as for example AlexaFluor™ 647) and a human BMP6 labelled with either an acceptor fluorophore or donor respectively to enable energy transfer between donor and acceptor, wherein said competition between the antibodies is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody. For example, the test antibody is directly or indirectly labelled with AlexaFluor™ 647 and competition is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal at 665 nM of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody. Optionally, the reduction in signal at 665 nM is at least 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 or 90%.
For example in part (b) a dose of ESA is administered 2, 3 or 4 times during the first 3 weeks of said period, or during said period.
In an alternative, the reference antibody is any anti-BMP6 antibody disclosed in WO2016098079 (the sequences and disclosure relating to such antibodies being incorporated herein for potential use in the present invention).
In an example, the subject is suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Reference is made to “KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease”, Kidney International Supplements (2012) 2, 279; doi:10.1038/kisup.2012.37. This discusses stages of chronic kidney disease (stages 1-5), diagnosis, CKD nomenclature, Hb levels and ranges in humans of various ages and ESA hyporesponsiveness. This reference discloses:—
Thus, in the present invention, optionally
Optionally, the subject is a CKD patient that has a diagnosed malignancy, has suffered one or more strokes, and/or has suffered a malignancy. ESA therapy is usually to be proceeded with caution (if at all) in such patients, and thus the invention (especially ESA reducing or sparing aspects thereof) are advantageous in such subjects.
Optionally, the subject is a CKD 5D patient (eg, an human adult, eg, a male or female) with Hb concentration from 9.0 to 10.0 g/dl.
Optionally, the invention is for maintaining Hb concentration above 11.5 g/dl in an human adult patient with CKD.
Optionally, the invention is for maintaining Hb concentration from 9.0 to 13 g/dl (eg, 9.0 to 11.5 g/dl) in an adult human patient with CKD.
Optionally, the invention is for maintaining Hb concentration from 11.0 to 12 g/dl in a paediatric human patient with CKD. In an example, the patient is 15 or younger; or younger than 15; or 10 or younger.
In an example, the CKD patient is an adult male. In another example, the CKD patient is an adult female.
Optionally, the subject (eg, an adult human) is a CKD 5HD patient, a patient on hemofiltration or a patient on hemodiafiltration therapy, wherein the method comprises intravenous or subcutaneous administration of ESA.
Optionally, the subject (eg, an adult human) is a CKD ND or CKD 5PD patient, wherein the method comprises subcutaneous administration of ESA.
Optionally, before administration of the anti-BMP6 antibody of fragment, the patient is ESA hporesponsive indicated by less than 5% increase or no increase in Hb concentration after a month ESA treatment (prior to carrying out the method of the invention).
1. Objectives
Anaemia is a common complication of infections and inflammatory diseases. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the time-dependent effects of an anti-human BMP6 antibody (hereafter human antibody “KYAB1248”) on baseline haemoglobin levels and on haemoglobin response to a erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, darbepoetin alfa, in a mouse model of acute anaemia induced by an injection of heat and phenol-killed Brucella abortus (BA) in healthy C57BL/6J male mice, as described by Kim et al, 2014 (infra). The effects of KYAB1248 were compared to those of a human IgG4 isotype control (antibody KYAB1110) that does not specifically bind BMP6.
2.1. Animals
The experiments were carried out using 120 male C57BL/6J mice, weighing 20-35 g (12-week old) at the beginning of the experiments.
The animals were housed in groups of 5-10 in polysulfone cages (floor area=1500 cm2) under standard conditions:room temperature (22±2° C.), hygrometry (55±10%), light/dark cycle (12 h/12 h), air replacement (15-20 volumes/hour), water and food (SDS, RM1 containing nominal 159.3 mg/kg iron) ad libitum. In case of aggressive dominance, mice were isolated from the social group. The mice were acclimated to environmental conditions for at least 5 days prior to experimentation. The mice were identified by marking their tail using indelible markers. The study was conducted under EU animal welfare regulations for animal use in experimentation (European Directive 2010/63/EU).
2.2. Choice of Species
The mouse has been chosen to evaluate the effects of the antibodies as it is well established from historical literature as an appropriate non-clinical model to investigate acute markers of iron metabolism, including serum iron, hepcidin gene expression and tissue levels of non-heme iron (Andriopoulos et al., 2009, supra). Moreover BA-induced model of anaemia was developed using C57BL/6J mice, as described by Kim et al. (Kim et al., 2014, supra).
2.3. Preparation of Brucella abortus Suspension
A concentrated suspension of Brucella abortus (Weybridge 99 Strain) inactivated by heat and phenol was used to induce anaemia in mice (Pourquier Wright's serum agglutination brucellosis antigen, ref P00110, Idexx). This suspension was stored at 5±3° C. until preparation of a concentrated suspension. BA suspension was centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 minutes at room temperature. Pellet was resuspended in sterile PBS (ref 14190-094, Gibco) so that to obtain a 50× concentrated BA suspension. Aliquots were prepared and stored at −80° C. until use. On the day of administration, this suspension was diluted in sterile PBS to the desired concentration of 10×.
2.4. Administration Protocol
Mice were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups (N=4 per group) and administered according to the treatment schedule described in the table 6 below.
Heat and phenol-killed BA was administered as a single intraperitoneal (ip) injection of a fixed volume of 200 μL of a 10× concentrated BA suspension per mouse (on day 0). In the “predose” group, mice were not dosed with the BA suspension. In the “ESA on day 1” group, mice received an ip administration of PBS (200 μL) instead of the BA suspension.
The intravenous (iv) route of administration was used to evaluate the effects of KYAB1248 in comparison with those of KYAB1110 hIgG4 isotype control since it is the intended clinical route. Each administration of KYAB1110 and KYAB1248 was performed on day 0 and day 6 as a tail vein bolus iv injection of the antibody solution at the dose of 10 mg/kg body weight under a volume of 5 mL/kg body weight. Each mouse was weighed prior to dosing. The doses of KYAB1248 and KYAB1110 were chosen according to the known pharmacological profile of each antibody.
In the “predose” group, mice were not dosed with any antibody. In the “ESA on day 1” group, mice received an iv administration of PBS (under a volume of 5 mL/kg body weight) instead of KYAB1110 or KYAB1248.
For the day 0 dosing, the BA suspension was administered first and then followed immediately with the KYAB1248 or KYAB1110 antibody iv injection, within a 5 minute window.
ESA (Darbepoetin alfa, Aranesp®, Amgen) was administered as a single subcutaneous (sc) injection at the dose of 100 μg/kg body weight under a volume of 10 mL/kg body weight on day 1 or day 7 (24 hours after antibody administration). Each mouse was weighed prior to dosing.
2.5. Parameters
Clinical signs were evaluated. Haemoglobin was measured in all animals except one from the ‘KYAB1248+ESA on day 7’ dose group (Day 8 sacrifice).
2.6. Terminal Procedure
2.6.1. Terminal Blood Collection
Terminal procedure was performed at the indicated time points (i.e. 6 hours, 24 hours, on days 7, 8, 14, 21 and 28 post-dose) with the group numbers indicated in the above table. Predose group (TO, non-administered mice) was also sacrificed.
At the end of the experiments, i.e. at each time point, all animals was anaesthetised with pentobarbital (180 mg/kg, ip) and venous blood was collected using cardiac puncture. Whole blood was immediately placed in lithium heparinised collection tubes as described below. Collection tubes was gently mixed. The exact time of blood sampling was noted for each animal. A minimum volume of 0.2 mL of non hemolysed whole blood was placed in a first lithium heparinized collection tube for standard haematology assessment.
Each test Item formulation was freshly prepared under sterile conditions on the day of dosing. For each antibody, a solution at the concentration of 2 mg/mL is needed to administer animals at the dose of 10 mg/kg. This solution was obtained by dilution of the 10 mg/mL stock solution in vehicle (sterile endotoxin tested PBS (Life Technologies, Product 10010023)) with a 1:5 dilution ratio.
3. Results
In BA inoculated animals receiving antibody doses only (i.e. without ESA administration) there was no observed difference in the blood haemoglobin anaemia profiles between KYAB1248 and the hIgG4 isotype control groups (
The administration of ESA to BA treated animals dosed with isotype control antibody had no impact on haemoglobin levels and the severity of the anaemia (day 14 mean haemoglobin results of 8.1, 7.8 and 8.2 g/dL for groups ‘no ESA’ (see
Changes in blood haemoglobin and improvements in anaemia were achieved in animals receiving KYAB1248 antibody and ESA however. This effect was most pronounced in animals dosed with ESA on Day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the BA injection and the first KYAB1248 antibody injection (
Female Lewis rats were kept on a standard rodent diet until they reached an age of 6 to 8 weeks and a body weight of 140 to 160 g. All treatments were performed by intraperitoneal (i.p.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. Chronic inflammation (arthritis) causing ACD was induced using an i.p. injection of a group A streptococcal peptidoglycan-polysaccharide (PG-APS) (Lee Laboratories, Grayson, Ga., USA) at a total dose of 15 μg rhamnose/g body weight.
Rats responding to PG-APS injection determined by development of arthritis and increased neutrophil count were randomized into 4 different groups. Treatment was started 2 weeks after PG-APS injections (day 0=D0).
The experiment was terminated after 4 weeks of treatment (6 weeks after PG-APS application) and rats were sacrificed. For determination of haemoglobin levels (over time, small blood samples (300 μL) were taken weekly by tail vein puncture from every animal.
After 4 treatment weeks animals were sacrificed and the experiment terminated.
The anti-BMP6 antibody (test antibody) is one that competes in a HTRF assay with a reference antibody for binding human BMP6 (or binds the same epitope of human BMP6 as the reference antibody), wherein the reference antibody comprises heavy chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2, and light chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the assay uses the test antibody labelled with a donor label (Eu3+cryptate) and a human BMP6 labelled with an acceptor fluorophore AlexaFluor™ 647 to enable energy transfer between donor and acceptor, wherein said competition between the antibodies is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody.
The anti-BMP6 antibody (test antibody) is one that competes in a HTRF assay with a reference antibody for binding human BMP6 (or binds the same epitope of human BMP6 as the reference antibody), wherein the reference antibody comprises heavy chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, and light chains each comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5, wherein the assay uses the test antibody labelled with a donor label (Eu3+cryptate) and a human BMP6 labelled with an acceptor fluorophore AlexaFluor™ 647 to enable energy transfer between donor and acceptor, wherein said competition between the antibodies is detected by a reduction in fluorescence signal of at least 20% when the test antibody is in the presence of the reference antibody versus signal without the reference antibody.
Results
Reference is made to
The results demonstrated that a combination of anti-BMP6 antibody and ESA (Group 5) could be used to treat subjects that had established anaemia. The combination treatment maintained Hb concentration above the baseline value throughout the 3 and 4 week periods (counted from D0) and at the end of the 4 week period Hb concentration had risen more than 8 g/dl from baseline. This was a highly significant result (as determined by a p-value of p<0.0001) compared to the administration of anti-BMP6 antibody alone (Group 3), and we believe that this would support the ability to lower or spare ESA dosing below conventional amounts (thus minimising side effects of ESA). Hb concentration at the end of the treatment period was also significantly higher with the combination treatment compared with ESA alone (as determined by a p-value of p<0.0001).
In the combination group there was a 25% increase even towards the end of the period (in the 4th week following the antibody administration), which was not observed in any other treatment group.
Significant improvements were also seen in MCH when comparing the combination treatment with ESA alone, both at the end of the 3rd and 4th weeks (as determined by a p-value of p<0.0001). Importantly, the MCH in the combination group was not significantly diminished. We believe, therefore, that in the combination group the enhanced Hb concentration is productively used in increased erythropoiesis (as indicated by increased Hb concentration and no significant diminishment in MCH).
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1607705 | May 2016 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of International Appl. No. PCT/GB2017/051208, filed Apr. 28, 2017, which in turn claims priority to GB1607705.9, filed May 3, 2016, the contents of each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4675187 | Konishi et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 8318167 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8795665 | Seo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8980582 | Seo et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 20050137329 | Holmes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272634 | Bahlmann | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20100136015 | Lin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20130059783 | Flygare | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20140086919 | Lin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140199314 | Lin | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309404 | Seo | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20160176956 | Cong | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20220073598 | Germaschewski et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2012508764 | Apr 2012 | JP |
| 2016501273 | Jan 2016 | JP |
| 2008003103 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008003103 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| 2010056981 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010-056981 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010056981 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2011004192 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011158009 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2013061098 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013061098 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2014099391 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2015040401 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2015103072 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2016098079 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016098079 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| 2016098079 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| 2017191437 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| 2017216724 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| 2020065252 | Apr 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Flight, Monica. AstraZeneca bets on FibroGen's anaemia drug. Nature. vol. 12, p. 730 (Oct. 2013 ). (Year: 2013). |
| Rivera et al. Animal Models of Anemia of Inflammation. Semin Hematol. October 46(4):351-357 (2009). (Year: 2009). |
| Andriopoulos, B., Jr., et al., “BMP6 Is a Key Endogenous Regulator of Hepcidin Expression and Iron Metabolism,” Nature Genetics 41(4):482-487, Nature Pub. Co., United States (2009). |
| Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work Group, “KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease,” Kidney International Supplements 2(4):279-335, KDIGO, United States (2012). |
| Kim, A., et al., “A Mouse Model of Anemia of Inflammation: Complex Pathogenesis With Partial Dependence on Hepcidin,” Blood 123(8):1129-1136, American Society of Hematology, United States (2014). |
| Theurl, M., et al., “Hepcidin as a Predictive Factor and Therapeutic Target in Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment for Anemia of Chronic Disease in Rats,” Haematologica 99(9):1516-1524, Ferrata Storti Foundation, Italy (2014). |
| Thomas, D. Wayne et al., “Guideline for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Functional Iron Deficiency,” Bristish Journal of Haematology, 2013, 161, pp. 639-648. |
| Amgen Inc. (Dec. 2013). “Epogen(R) (epoetin alfa) Injection, for Intravenous or Subcutaneous Use,” 27 pages. |
| Amgen Inc. (Jul. 2015). “ARANESP(R) (darbepoetin alfa) Injection, for Intravenous or Subcutaneous Use,” 25 pages. |
| Hayat, A. et al. (Jan. 1, 2008). “Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents in the Management of Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease,” Patient Preference and Adherence 2:195-200. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Nov. 6, 2018, for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2017/051208, filed Apr. 28, 2017, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 23, 2017, for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2017/051208, filed Apr. 28, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Macciò, A. et al. (Jan. 1, 2012). “Management of Anemia of Inflammation in the Elderly,” Anemia 2012 (563251):1-20. |
| Akchurin, O. et al. (2016, e-pub. Jul. 20, 20160. “Lack of Hepcidin Ameliorates Anemia and Improves Growth In An Adenine-Induced Mouse Model of Chronic Kidney Disease,” Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 311:F877-F889. |
| Berger, S.L. (1987). “Isolation of Cytoplamic RNA: Ribonucleoside-Vanadyl Complexes,” Methods in Enzymology 152:227-234. |
| Casanovas, G. et al. (Jan. 2, 2014). “A Multi-Scale 25 Model of Hepcidin Promoter Regulation Reveals Factors Controlling Systemic Iron Hemeostasis,” PLoS Comput. Biol. 10(1):e1003421, 13 pages. |
| Chothia, C. et al. (1987). “Canonical Structures for the Hypervariable Regions of Immunoglobulins,” J. Mol. Biol. 196:901-917. |
| DiGiammarino, E. et al. (2012). “Design and Generation of DVD-IgTM Molecules For Dual-Specific Targeting,” Meth. Mo. Biol.889:145-156. |
| Freshney, R.I. (2005). Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique, 65th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 115-128. TOC, 12 pages. |
| Ganz, T. et al. (2011). “The Hepcidin-Ferroportin System as a Therapeutic Target in Anemias and Iron Overload Disorders,” Hematology 2011:538-542. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 23, 2021, for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2019/052294, filed Aug. 15, 2019, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 22, 2019, for PCT Application No. PCT/GB2019/052294, filed Aug. 15, 2019, 9 pages. |
| Kabat, E.A. et al. (1971). “Attempts to Locate Complementarity-Determining Residues in the Variable Positions of Light and Heavy Chains,” Ann NY Acad Sci 190:382-391. |
| Kabat, E.A. et al. (1991). Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD., Table of Contents, 21 pages. |
| Kautz, L. et al. (Oct. 16, 2014, e-pub. Sep. 5, 2014). “Erythroferrone Contributes to Recovery From Anemia of Inflammation,” Blood 124(16):2569-2574. |
| Kim, S.Y. et al. (Nov. 19, 2015). “Recent Advances in Developing Inhibitors for Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylases and Their Therapeutic Implications,” Molecules 20:20551-20568. |
| LaTour, C. et al. (2016, e-pub. Nov. 12, 2015). “Differing Impact of the Deletion of Hemochromatosis-Associated Molecules HFE and Trasferrin Receptor-2 on the Iron Phenotype of Mice Lacking Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6 or Hemojuvelin,” Hepatology 63(1):126-137. |
| Lee, J.H. et al. (Sep. 25, 2015). “Antibodies to a Conformational Epitope on gp41 Neutralize HIV-1 by Destabilizing the Env Spike,” Nature Communications 6:8167, 14 pages. |
| LeFranc, M.P. (Nov. 1, 1997). “Unique Database Numbering System for Immunogenetic Analysis,” Immunol. Today 18(11):P509. |
| Mathis, G. (1995). “Probing Molecular Interactions with Homogeneous Techniques Based on Rare Earth Cryptates and Fluorescence Energy Transfer,” Clinical Chemistry 41(9):1391-1397. |
| Mayeur, C. et al. (Apr. 3, 2014). “The Type I BMP Receptor Alk3 is Required for the Induction of Hepatic Hepcidin Gene Expression by Interleukin-6,” Blood 123(14):2261-2268. |
| Nai, A. et al. (Feb. 12, 2015). “The Second Transferrin Receptor Regulates Red Blood Cell Production in Mice,” Blood 125(7):1170-1179. |
| Nangaku, M. et al. (2007). “A Novel Class of Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors Induces Angiogenesis and Exerts Organ Protection Against Ischemia,” Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27:2548-2554. |
| Niederfellner, G. et al. (Jul. 14, 2011). “Epitope Characterization and Crystal Structure of GA101 Provide Insights into the Molecular Basis for Type I/II Distinction of CD20 Antibodies,” Blood 118(2):358-367. |
| Paul, W.E. ed., Fundamental Immunology: Second Edition, Raven Press, New York at (1989) pp. 332-337. |
| Poloznikov, A.A. et al. (Jan. 29, 20210. “HIF Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors for COVID-19 Treatment: Pros and Cons,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 11(621054):1-11. |
| Ramey, G. et al. (2010). “Hepcidin Targets Ferroportin for Degradation in Hepatocytes,” Haematologica 95 (3):501-504. |
| Rudikoff, S. et al. (Mar. 1982). “Single Amino Acid Substitution Altering Antigen-Binding Specificity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:1979-1983. |
| Sambrook, J. et al. (2012). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4 ed.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., USA, TOC, 34 pages. |
| Schluessener, H.J. et al. (1995). “Immunolocalization of BMP-6, A Novel RGF-β-Related Cytokind, in Normal and Atherosclerotic Smooth Muscle Cells,” Atherosclerosis 113:153-156. |
| Selleck Chemical (2013). “HIF Inhibitors,” Selleckchem.com, 4 pages. |
| Spiess, C. et al. (2015, e-pub. Jan. 27, 2015). “Alternative Molecular Formats and Therapeutic Applications for Bispecific Antibodies,” Mol. Immunol. 67:95-106. |
| Steinbicker, A.U. et al. (Oct. 13, 2011, e-pub. Aug. 12, 2011). “Perturbation of Hepcidin Expression by BMP Type I Receptor Deletion Induces Iron Overload in Mice,” Blood 118(15):4224-4230. |
| Suckau, D. et al. (Dec. 1990). “Molecular Epitope Identification by Limited Proteolysis of an Immobilized Antigen-Antibody Complex and Mass Spectrometric Peptide Mapping,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87:9848-9852. |
| Tegley, C.M. et al. (2008, e-pub. Jun. 13, 20080. “Discovery of Novel Hydroxy-Thiazoles as HIP-α Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors: SAR, Synthesis, and Modeling Evaluation,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 18:3925-3928. |
| The Human Protein Atlas (2021). Retrieved from internet www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000168509-5HFE2/cell#rna, last visited May 1, 2021, 1 page. |
| Theurl, I. et al. (Nov. 3, 2011, e-pub. Jul. 7, 2011). “Pharmacologic Inhibition of Hepcidin Expression Reverses Anemia of Chronic Inflammation in Rats,” Blood 118(18):4977-4984, 16 pages. |
| Wang, R.-H. et al. (Dec. 2005). “A Role of SMAD4 in Iron Metabolism Through the Positive Regulation of Hepcidin Expression,” Cell Metabolism 2(6):399-409. |
| Warshakoon, N.C. et al. (2006). “Design and Synthesis of a Series of Novel Pyrazolopyridines as HIF 1-α Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 16:5687-5690. |
| Xia, Y. et al. (May 15, 2008). “Hemojuvelin Regulates Hepcidin Expression Via a Selective Subset of BMP LIgands and Receptors Independently of Neogenin,” Blood 111(10):5195-5204. |
| Xu, J.L. et al. (Jul. 2000). “Diversity in the CDR3 Region of VH is Sufficient for Most Antibody Specificities,” Immunity 13:37-45. |
| Yu, Z. et al. (May 31, 1993). “Recent Advances in Clinical hematology,” Jinan University Press, pp. 83-84, with English Translation. |
| Yusa, K. et al. (Jan. 25, 2011). “A Hyperactive piggyBac Transposase for Mammalian Applications,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(4):1531-1536. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170319689 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/GB2017/051208 | Apr 2017 | US |
| Child | 15610955 | US |
