In part, the disclosure relates generally to the field of vascular system and peripheral vascular system imaging and data collection.
Interventional cardiologists incorporate a variety of diagnostic tools during catheterization procedures in order to plan, guide, and assess therapies. Fluoroscopy is generally used to perform angiographic imaging of blood vessels. In turn, such blood vessel imaging is used by physicians to diagnose, locate and treat blood vessel disease during interventions such as bypass surgery or stent placement. Intravascular imaging technologies such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and acoustic technologies such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and others are also valuable tools that can be used in lieu of or in combination with fluoroscopy to obtain high-resolution data regarding the condition of the blood vessels for a given subject.
Intravascular optical coherence tomography is a catheter-based imaging modality that uses light to peer into coronary artery walls and generate images thereof for study. Utilizing coherent light, interferometry, and micro-optics, OCT can provide video-rate in-vivo tomography within a diseased vessel with micrometer level resolution. Viewing subsurface structures with high resolution using fiber-optic probes makes OCT especially useful for minimally invasive imaging of internal tissues and organs. This level of detail made possible with OCT allows a clinician to diagnose as well as monitor the progression of coronary artery disease. Angiography is a noninvasive x-ray imaging method that collects data from outside the body during injection of a radio-opaque contrast fluid.
Given the complexity of the various technologies described above and the associated complexity of the datasets each of them generate, co-registering such datasets is difficult. If the relevant systems, such as for example an angiography system and an OCT system, are not calibrated to one another, the likelihood of achieving accurate co-registration is low.
Accordingly, a need therefore exists to provide suitable calibration methods and systems suitable for increasing coregistration accuracy. Embodiments of the disclosure address these challenges and others.
In part, the disclosure relates to a multimodal diagnostic system and components thereof configured to co-register two or more of the following OCT, IVUS, FFR, and angiography. In one embodiment, OCT images and angiography images are co-registered after calibrating a combined OCT and x-ray imaging system to determine a time delay to align or synchronize the two sets of frames of image data. In one embodiment, the time delay is determined based upon a minimum value from multiple calibration trials. As discussed herein, angiography systems can be used to obtain a cine sequence or set of cine images. Such a set or sequence includes one or more images that are obtained over time. This set of images is effectively a short movie with each image being a frame that can track and show movement and cardiovascular system changes as the heart progresses through the cardiac cycle.
The initiation of an x-ray based imaging system such an angiography system can be caused by one or more control signals sent from one or more control systems. Similarly, the initiation of an intravascular imaging system such an OCT system can be caused by one or more control signals sent from one or more control systems to a patient interface unit or PIU. During an OCT data collection session, the optical fiber and associated lens positioned to send and receive light rotates within a blood vessel. The PIU to which an intravascular data collection probe connects receives a control signal which causes the probe tip to rotate and then translates the probe tip as part of a pullback through the blood vessel.
Initially, the probe tip captures an image along a ray or scan line as it rotates prior to translation along a support. In one embodiment, an angiography initiating control signal is transmitted prior to transmitting an OCT initiating control signal. As a result, the angiography system captures one or more frames of angiography images such as J frames of angiography data prior to capturing a first frame of OCT image data. The first frame of OCT image data can include images obtained while the probe tip rotates prior to being translated along a vessel during a pullback.
In part, the disclosure relates to a method of calibrating a combination angiography and an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. The method can include acquiring angiography frames prior to initiation of an OCT probe pullback; acquiring OCT data during the OCT probe pullback; acquiring angiography frames during the OCT probe pullback; generating a plurality of OCT frames using the OCT data obtained during the pullback; determining an initial frame of the OCT probe pullback from the plurality of OCT frames; determining an initial angiography frame that corresponds to the initial frame of OCT probe pullback; determining a time delay between the initial OCT frame and the initial angiography frame; and aligning OCT and angiography frames using the time delay.
In one embodiment, the method further includes displaying one or more aligned OCT frames and angiography frames. In one embodiment, determining a time delay includes performing a plurality of calibration trials to determine a plurality of delay periods and selecting the minimum delay period as the time delay. In one embodiment, the plurality of calibration trials is N trials, wherein N ranges from 2 trials to about 12 trials. In one embodiment, the method further includes initiating the OCT pullback at an initiation time, wherein a computing device stores the initiation time in memory. In one embodiment, determining the initial frame of the OCT probe pullback includes identifying the OCT frame corresponding to the initiation time as the initial frame of the OCT probe pullback. In one embodiment, determining the initial angiography frame includes determining a first angiography frame indicative of movement of a marker attached to the OCT probe and selecting a second angiography frame preceding the first angiography frame as the initial angiography frame.
In part, in one embodiment, the disclosure relates to a method of calibrating an optical coherence tomography system and an angiography system. The method includes generating N sets of optical coherence tomography (OCT) image data, wherein each of the N sets of OCT image data is obtained by performing N ex vivo pullbacks of an intravascular data collection probe comprising a marker; generating N sets of angiography image data comprising a plurality of two-dimensional images, wherein each of the N sets of angiography image comprise a plurality of two-dimensional images of the marker in two or more different spatial positions; generating N sets of OCT frames using the N sets of OCT image data obtained during the N ex vivo pullbacks; determining an initial frame of the OCT probe pullback from the plurality of OCT frames for each set N; determining an initial angiography frame that corresponds to the initial frame of OCT probe pullback for each set N; determining a time delay between the initial OCT frame and the initial angiography frame for each set N such that N time delays are determined; selecting a minimum time delay from the N time delays; and aligning OCT and angiography frames using the minimum time delay.
In one embodiment of the method, determining the initial angiography frame includes determining a first angiography frame indicative of movement of a marker attached to the OCT probe and selecting a second angiography frame preceding the first angiography frame as the initial angiography frame. In one embodiment, N ranges from 2 to 12. In one embodiment, the method further includes initiating the OCT pullback at an initiation time, wherein a computing device stores the initiation time in memory. In one embodiment of the method, determining the initial frame of the OCT probe pullback includes identifying the OCT frame corresponding to the initiation time as the initial frame of an ex vivo pullback. In one embodiment, determining the initial angiography frame includes using a computing device to track pixel changes in angiography frames to identify marker movement. In one embodiment, a frame rate of the OCT system is greater than the frame rate of the angiography system.
In part, in one embodiment, the disclosure relates to a system for calibrating a combination intravascular and extravascular imaging system. The calibration system can include an x-ray based imaging subsystem and an optical imaging subsystem such as an interferometry-based subsystem. In one embodiment, the calibration system includes an optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe comprising a marker, wherein the probe is disposed on a support and disposed within an imaging zone of an angiography system; an optical coherence data processing system comprising a computing device, wherein the computing device generates frames of OCT images based upon received intravascular probe signals; one or more memory devices; and a control signal input in electrical communication with the one or more memory devices, wherein the control signal input is in electrical communication with a controller programmed to initiate a plurality of ex vivo pullbacks of the OCT probe and transmit each ex vivo pullback initiation time to the one or more memory devices.
The computing device can include, in an embodiment, a calibration method stored in the one or more memory device as instructions to cause the computing device to determine an initial frame of the OCT probe for each ex vivo pullback. The computing device can include, in an embodiment, a calibration method stored in the one or more memory device as instructions to cause the computing device to determine an initial angiography frame that corresponds to the initial frame of OCT probe pullback. The computing device can include, in an embodiment, a calibration method stored in the one or more memory device as instructions to cause the computing device to determine a time delay between the initial OCT frame and the initial angiography frame. The computing device can include, in an embodiment, a calibration method stored in the one or more memory device as instructions to cause the computing device to align OCT and angiography frames using the time delay.
In part, the disclosure relates to a method of imaging a blood vessel and/or calibrating a system that images a blood vessel. The method includes generating a set of intravascular image data comprising a plurality of intravascular image frames at a first frame rate using an intravascular imaging system comprising a first clock; storing the intravascular image data in one or more non-transitory computer readable memory devices; generating a set of extravascular image data comprising a plurality of extravascular image frames at a second frame rate using an extravascular imaging system comprising a second clock; storing the extravascular image data in one or more non-transitory computer readable memory devices. The method includes detecting motion in one of the plurality of frames. The frame preceding the frame having detected motion is selected as an initial frame in one embodiment. In one embodiment, the plurality of extravascular image frames comprises an angiography cine.
In one embodiment, an intravascular data collection system collects data simultaneously with but asynchronously relative to an extravascular data collection system. The method determines a delay or calibration period to synchronize frames obtained from the two asynchronous data collection systems. The method can include co-registering the OCT image data and the angiography data by aligning one or more OCT frames with one or more angiography frames by a calibration time period.
In one embodiment, the disclosure relates to a calibration method. The method includes synchronizing x-ray image frames and intravascular image frames using a calibration period determined from a plurality of trials. The method include programmatically generating a calibration period using an initial x-ray image frame having detected marker motion and an initial intravascular image frame determined by storing when a control signal to initiate marker motion is sent to an interface unit in mechanical communication with a marker and able to translate the marker over a plurality of positions.
In part, the disclosure relates to a method of calibrating a combination angiography and an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. The method includes storing a plurality of angiography frames in one or more memory devices in electrical communication with a computing device; storing a plurality of OCT frames in one or more memory devices in electrical communication with the computing device, the OCT frames and angiography frames generated asynchronously during an overlapping time period corresponding to an OCT probe pullback; determining an initial frame of the OCT probe pullback from the plurality of OCT frames; determining an initial angiography frame that corresponds to the initial frame of OCT probe pullback; programmatically generating, using the computing device, a calibration period based upon a timestamp of the initial frame of OCT probe pullback and based upon a timestamp of the initial angiography frame; and synchronizing a plurality of the asynchronously generated OCT frames and angiography frames. In one embodiment, the computing device is a microprocessor or one or more circuits of an OCT data processing system. In one embodiment, the computing device is a microprocessor or one or more circuits of an angiography data processing system.
The figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrative principles. The figures are to be considered illustrative in all aspects and are not intended to limit the disclosure, the scope of which is defined only by the claims.
The following description refers to the accompanying drawings that illustrate certain embodiments of the present disclosure. Other embodiments are possible and modifications may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Therefore, the following detailed description is not meant to limit the present disclosure; rather, the scope of the present disclosure is defined by the claims.
Intravascular data collection such as imaging of a blood vessel can be performed by inserting a catheter comprising a data collection probe into an artery and advancing it until it reaches a region of interest within a blood vessel, such a coronary artery. An angiography system can obtain external angiographic images of that vessel, such as a cine sequence, during the imaging of the blood vessel. In one embodiment, the region of interest is imaged by pulling the data collection probe through the catheter while optical, acoustic, or other sensors in the probe collect intravascular data. The process of pulling the data collecting probe through a region of interest in a blood vessel is referred to as a pullback in one embodiment. According to the disclosure, it is advantageous to initiate the angiography image capture prior to initiating the pullback for purposes of subsequently co-registering the angiographic and intravascular image data sets.
Co-registration of two or more imaging technologies such as angiography and OCT, for example, is challenging to implement. As disclosed herein, OCT/angiography or x-ray based coregistration (“angiography coregistration”) methods facilitate visualization of a position of or a subset of an OCT image on a corresponding angiography image acquired at a similar point in time. Such coregistration methods can be implemented using hardware, software, or combinations thereof
In part, the disclosure relates to various systems, components thereof, and methods for use in a catheter lab or other facility to perform one or more calibration processes to improve co-registration accuracy with respect to data collected with regard to a subject. In one embodiment, the data can include one or more cine sequences obtained using an x-ray system such as an angiography system. Further, the data can include intravascular data. An example of intravascular data is OCT data which can be obtained using an intravascular imaging probe and an OCT system. The OCT data can be stored in computer-readable memory as scan lines, images, or in other data formats. Intravascular ultrasound data is another type of intravascular data.
Examples of such probes include OCT, IVUS, FRR, or other data collection probes. The probe includes one or more of a guidewire, a pressure sensing wire-based probe, an optical fiber and other components. An optical fiber 18 is shown extending from where the probe would be disposed in the vessel 15. The tip of a given data collection probe can include a marker. These markers are identified by M as shown herein in the non-invasively acquired image frames such as the x-ray generated images. As shown in
For a probe that includes an optical beam director or lens, the optical fiber is in optical communication with the beam director or lens. A torque wire can be part of the probe defines a bore in which an optical fiber is disposed. In addition, the probe also includes the sheath such as a polymer sheath (not shown) which forms part of a catheter. The optical fiber, which in the context of an OCT system is a portion of the sample arm of an interferometer, is optically coupled to a patient interface unit (PIU) as shown. The PIU can be operated using various controls that can be used to initiate the pullback of the probe through the vessel.
The data collection system 10 includes a noninvasive imaging system 20 such as a nuclear magnetic resonance, x-ray, angiography, computer aided tomography, or other suitable noninvasive imaging technology. As shown as a non-limiting example of such a noninvasive imaging system, an angiography system such as suitable for generating cines is shown. The angiography system can include a fluoroscopy system. The noninvasive imaging system collects extravascular or peripheral imaging data while the intravascular imaging probe pulled back through the vessel generates cross-sectional views 50 as shown. Theses intravascular images 50 can be cross-sectional view, longitudinal views, or other views generated using data from an intravascular data collection probe.
The noninvasive imaging system 20 and the PIU are in communication with separate data storage and processing systems 55, 57 or can be in communication with one data storage and processing system 60. One or more of such systems 55, 57, or 60 can be used individually or integrated together. These systems can be implemented as a workstation or server in one embodiment or generally as a computing device. A computing device may include a server computer, a client user computer, a personal computer (PC), a laptop computer, a tablet PC, a desktop computer, a control system, a microprocessor or any computing device capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that computing device. Further, while a single computing device is illustrated, the term “computing device” shall also be taken to include any collection of computing devices that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the software features or methods such as interface.
In one embodiment, the computing device is an optical coherence tomography computer programmed to perform one or more temporal calibration methods as described herein. The programs, instructions, and control signal information and related co-registration methods that can use a calibration time can be implemented using software instructions stored in memory 65 or as a hardware-based integrated circuit 68. In one embodiment, an external database 70 is used to store image frames, calibration time periods, co-registered OCT and x-ray images and other information described herein with respect to the systems and collected image data. The time delay outputs of multiple calibration trials can be stored in memory such as database 70 or in the systems described herein and ranked to select a minimum time delay using one or more processors or computing devices. In one embodiment, memory 65 receives an OCT pullback initiation time corresponding to one the OCT probe pullback starts. This initiation time can be correlated with a corresponding captured OCT frame, which can be identified as the initial frame of the OCT pullback.
The patient interface unit includes a probe connector suitable to receive an end of the probe and be optically coupled thereto. The PIU includes suitable joints and elements based on the type of data collection probe being used. In addition to being pulled back, the probe tip is also typically rotated by the PIU. In this way, a blood vessel of the subject 10 can be imaged longitudinally or via cross-sections.
In turn, the PIU is connected to one or more intravascular data collection systems 55 or 60 as described herein. The intravascular data collection system 55, 60 can be an OCT system, an IVUS system, another imaging system, and combinations of the foregoing. For example, the system 60 in the context of a probe being an OCT probe can include the sample arm of an interferometer, the reference arm of an interferometer, photodiodes, a control system, and patient interface unit.
The intravascular image data such as the frames of intravascular data generated using the data collection probe can be routed to the data collection processing system 60 coupled to the probe via PIU. The noninvasive image data generated using system 20 can be transmitted to, stored in, and processed by one or more computing devices. A video frame grabber device such as a computer board configured to capture the angiography image data from system 20 can be used in various embodiments as part of systems 55, 57, or 60.
Calibration and Co-registration
In one embodiment of a coregistration method, a set of angiography data such a cine sequence of images is acquired during an OCT pullback. Thus, as an OCT imaging probe is pulled back through a blood vessel as it rotates, the marker M disposed on or in the OCT probe moves with it and is identifiable and trackable in the set of simultaneously captured angiography frames. If a coregistration calibration method of the angiography system and the OCT system is not performed or is inadequate to calibrate the relevant imaging system, the OCT frames and the angiography frames may not be aligned.
In turn, this results in a failure to coregister the x-ray and optical imaging datasets. In addition, the failure to align the OCT and angiography datasets could result in errors such as positional cursor errors. Thus, the cursor used by a clinician or other system operators used to show where the OCT image was taken on the angiography image may be out of sync by several frames. This can cause a lack confidence in system users such that they doubt that the on screen cursor is actually showing them what it purports to show them. Additional details relating to the problems of a time lag and misalignment of OCT image frames and angiography image frames is described in more detail with regards to
In one embodiment, two steps are performed to achieve accurate coregistration in conjunction with a calibrated multimodal imaging system such as an OCT and angiography system. The first step is identifying or locating a reference point or section of an intravascular data collection probe throughout a set of image frames such as angiography frames that constitute a cine sequence. The reference point or section can include a marker, a probe tip, a lens, a pressure transducer, a beam director, or other probe locus, portion, component or combinations thereof. All of the foregoing can be used as markers M shown in the relevant figures.
Thus, for an OCT imaging probe, a lens is used to direct and receive light and collect data that corresponds to depth measurements such that a tomographic image of the imaged region can be generated. The second factor is temporally aligning the angiographic and OCT data sets. In part, the disclosure relates to calibration methods that can be performed when installing an OCT system in catheter lab to operate in conjunction with an angiography system. The calibration of an OCT system is also performed when an angiography system is changed that is used in conjunction with the OCT system. When a change in such a multimodal imaging system occurs, re-calibration is often necessary to prevent or fix co-registration anomalies.
The calibration methods described herein improve the accuracy when co-registering a set of intravascular data, such as for example, a set of OCT images, and a set of peripheral or extravascular data such as a set of angiography images. In part, the disclosure relates to determining the relative time period between OCT and angiographic data sets. This time period can be determined and the can be used as a temporal calibration factor for the angiography coregistration software.
As shown in
Similarly, the same physical event E1 is also captured in an angiography image frame that is stored into computer memory at a future point in time “T2” after the physical event E1 and after its OCT capture E2 as effectively a third event E3. The time periods T1 and T2 represent the finite time required to generate, transmit, and process the OCT and angiography images, respectively. In one embodiment, the time period T1 ranges from about several microseconds to about several seconds. In one embodiment, the time period T2 ranges from about several microseconds to about several seconds. In one embodiment, the time period T3 ranges from about several microseconds to about several seconds. The frame rate of an OCT system ranges from about 20 frames per second to about 1000 frames per second. The frame rate of a non-invasive imaging system such as an x-ray-based system ranges from about 10 frames per second to about 60 frames per second.
Since T1 and T2 may be different, a fixed time period T3 exists between when the OCT frame is stored into computer memory E2 and when the corresponding angiography frame is stored into computer memory E3. If this time period T3 is not compensated for, OCT frame positions are displayed on the incorrect angiography frame. In turn, such a failure to compensate for such a time lag T3 can lead to inaccuracies in coregistration. As described herein, T3 can be accurately determined using a calibration method.
In turn, with a T3 value determined using the systems and methods described herein, the OCT and angiography data sets can be temporally aligned. After alignment using the determined T3 value the OCT frame positions can be displayed on the correct angiography frame using the systems described herein. One or more calibration systems 100 can be used to determine T3. The calibration system can be implemented using one or more of the components of system 10 of
Next, a determination is made as to which OCT frame represents the initial frame of the pullback. A human may inspect the OCT image data and estimate which frame represents the initial frame of the pullback. Alternatively, a computing device can be used to determine the initial frame of the pullback such as by automatically logging the time at which a command was sent to initiate the OCT pullback. Machine vision and image processing software can also be used by a computing device to determine the initial frame of the pullback. In the example shown in
Next, a determination is made as to which angiography frame represents the closest point in time to the initial OCT frame. This determination may also be made either by a human user or an automatic computer routine. Either a human user or a computer algorithm may inspect the angiography data and estimate which frame corresponds to the initial frame of the pullback. In the example shown in
In one embodiment, the disclosure relates to the implementation of various steps or a subset thereof. The steps include acquiring OCT data during OCT probe pullback; acquiring angiography data during OCT probe pullback; determining initial frame of OCT probe pullback from set of OCT frames; determining initial angiography frame that corresponds to initial frame of OCT probe pullback; determining time delay between initial OCT frame and initial angiography frame; selecting minimum time delay from multiple calibration trials; aligning OCT and angiography frames using minimum time delay; and displaying one or more aligned OCT and angiography frames.
In one embodiment, the angiography frame that is selected as the frame corresponding to initial probe or marker M movement is the frame before the frame for which motion is detected. Thus, even if there is movement at time A2, if the first frame that is detected as having movement is at time A3, A3 is not selected as the frame having initial movement. Instead, the frame before it, the middle frame corresponding to time A2 is selected. If frame A2 were detected as the frame having initial marker or probe motion then as part of the calibration method the first frame A1 would be set as the initial movement angiography frame. This approach effectively sets the origin at which motion starts earlier to help improve calibration results.
In general, in one embodiment frames of angiography data are processed, scanned or viewed to identify the occurrence of marker M movement or another probe feature. Once a frame has been identified as depicting probe movement, the frame immediately prior to that is identified for the purposes of the calibration method and the determination of time T3 as the angiography frame having initial movement. This process of adjusting for movement errors has been found to improve system calibration by reducing the likelihood that the frame of initial movement is missed.
In one embodiment, a marker M disposed on the probe such as near the lens of the OCT probe translates within the bore of a catheter along the support 130 as one or more motors in the PIU pull a torque wire in which is disposed an optical fiber in optical communication with a lens or beam director. Each frame of the angiography dataset is transmitted to an OCT computer, digitized by a frame grabber, and time stamped as the frame is stored in memory.
At the same time, an OCT dataset is generated by an OCT engine and transmitted to the same OCT computing device. Each OCT frame is time stamped as it enters memory. In this way the methods described herein such as shown in
Based upon experimentation and testing to address errors detected during co-registration trials, it has been determined advantageous to conduct the temporal calibration procedure described above multiple times. By performing the calibration method multiple times it is possible to determine a more accurate assessment of T3. Performing multiple iterations of the calibration method to generate a set of T3 values addresses two sources of error. The first of these sources of T3 errors or variation is that OCT and angiography datasets are generated asynchronously (i.e., the OCT and angiography systems are independent devices with no master clocking mechanism). The second source of T3 errors or variation is that because the angiography frame rate is typically much lower than the OCT frame rate, the calculated value of T3 may vary by up to +/− one angiography frame period.
As a result of the lack of a master clocking system and the potential misalignment of frames due to frame rate differences, performing the calibration procedure multiple times and selecting the minimum value of T3 as a calibration parameter is performed. This optimization of the T3 calibration delay period by repeated calculation and minimum value selection allows for an accurate assessment of the actual lag time period T3 between the OCT and angiography datasets. Once a suitable T3 value has been determined, the OCT and angiography frames can be aligned on the same temporal reference frame. Each T3 in an exemplary set of T3 values can range from about 1 millisecond to about 500 milliseconds.
The smallest value in the set of N time delays is selected. The smallest value has been determined to be a suitable estimate from N samples. In one embodiment, N ranges from 2 to 15. In one embodiment, N ranges from 4 to 10. When a minimum T3 value from a set of N values is obtained, it can be used to identify an angiography frame, such as frame 2 in
Non-limiting Software Features and Embodiments for Implementing Angiography and Intravascular Data Calibration
The following description is intended to provide an overview of device hardware and other operating components suitable for performing the methods of the disclosure described herein. This description is not intended to limit the applicable environments or the scope of the disclosure. Similarly, the hardware and other operating components may be suitable as part of the apparatuses described above. The disclosure can be practiced with other system configurations, including personal computers, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable electronic devices, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations can be used by those skilled in the computer and software related fields. In one embodiment, an algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of operations leading to a desired result. The operations performed as methods stops or otherwise described herein are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, transformed, compared, and otherwise manipulated.
Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “comparing” or “aligning” or “synchronizing” or “operating” or “generating” or “co-registering” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
The present disclosure, in some embodiments, also relates to the apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below.
Embodiments of the disclosure may be implemented in many different forms, including, but in no way limited to, computer program logic for use with a processor (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose computer), programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device, (e.g., a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other PLD), discrete components, integrated circuitry (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)), or any other means including any combination thereof. In a typical embodiment of the present disclosure, some or all of the processing of the data collected using an OCT probe, an FFR probe, an angiography system, and other imaging and subject monitoring devices and the processor-based system is implemented as a set of computer program instructions that is converted into a computer executable form, stored as such in a computer readable medium, and executed by a microprocessor under the control of an operating system. Thus, user interface instructions and triggers based upon the completion of a pullback or a co-registration request, for example, are transformed into processor understandable instructions suitable for generating OCT data, performing image procession using various and other features and embodiments described above.
Computer program logic implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be embodied in various forms, including, but in no way limited to, a source code form, a computer executable form, and various intermediate forms (e.g., forms generated by an assembler, compiler, linker, or locator). Source code may include a series of computer program instructions implemented in any of various programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a high-level language such as Fortran, C, C++, JAVA, or HTML) for use with various operating systems or operating environments. The source code may define and use various data structures and communication messages. The source code may be in a computer executable form (e.g., via an interpreter), or the source code may be converted (e.g., via a translator, assembler, or compiler) into a computer executable form.
The computer program may be fixed in any form (e.g., source code form, computer executable form, or an intermediate form) either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device. The computer program may be fixed in any form in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies. The computer program may be distributed in any form as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink-wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the internet or World Wide Web).
Hardware logic (including programmable logic for use with a programmable logic device) implementing all or part of the functionality previously described herein may be designed using traditional manual methods, or may be designed, captured, simulated, or documented electronically using various tools, such as Computer Aided Design (CAD), a hardware description language (e.g., VHDL or AHDL), or a PLD programming language (e.g., PALASM, ABEL, or CUPL).
Programmable logic may be fixed either permanently or transitorily in a tangible storage medium, such as a semiconductor memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory device (e.g., a CD-ROM), or other memory device. The programmable logic may be fixed in a signal that is transmittable to a computer using any of various communication technologies, including, but in no way limited to, analog technologies, digital technologies, optical technologies, wireless technologies (e.g., Bluetooth), networking technologies, and internetworking technologies. The programmable logic may be distributed as a removable storage medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink-wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the communication system (e.g., the internet or World Wide Web).
Various examples of suitable processing modules are discussed below in more detail. As used herein a module refers to software, hardware, or firmware suitable for performing a specific data processing or data transmission task. In one embodiment, a module refers to a software routine, program, or other memory resident application suitable for receiving, transforming, routing and processing instructions, or various types of data such as angiography data, OCT data, timestamps, calibration periods, marker position data, movement data, pixel information, calibration trial data and other information of interest as described herein.
Computers and computer systems described herein may include operatively associated computer-readable media such as memory for storing software applications used in obtaining, processing, storing and/or communicating data. It can be appreciated that such memory can be internal, external, remote or local with respect to its operatively associated computer or computer system.
Memory may also include any means for storing software or other instructions including, for example and without limitation, a hard disk, an optical disk, floppy disk, DVD (digital versatile disc), CD (compact disc), memory stick, flash memory, ROM (read only memory), RAM (random access memory), DRAM (dynamic random access memory), PROM (programmable ROM), EEPROM (extended erasable PROM), and/or other like computer-readable media.
In general, computer-readable memory media applied in association with embodiments of the disclosure described herein may include any memory medium capable of storing instructions executed by a programmable apparatus. Where applicable, method steps described herein may be embodied or executed as instructions stored on a computer-readable memory medium or memory media. These instructions may be software embodied in various programming languages such as C++, C, Java, and/or a variety of other kinds of software programming languages that may be applied to create instructions in accordance with embodiments of the disclosure.
The aspects, embodiments, features, and examples of the disclosure are to be considered illustrative in all respects and are not intended to limit the disclosure, the scope of which is defined only by the claims. Other embodiments, modifications, and usages will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed disclosure.
The use of headings and sections in the application is not meant to limit the disclosure; each section can apply to any aspect, embodiment, or feature of the disclosure.
The use of arrow heads showing directionality in a given figure or the lack thereof are not intended to limit or require a direction in which information can flow. For a given connector, such as the arrows and lines shown connecting the elements shown in the figures information can flow in one or more directions or in only one direction as suitable for a given embodiment. The connections can include various suitable data transmitting connections such as optical, wire, power, wireless, or electrical connections.
Throughout the application, where compositions are described as having, including, or comprising specific components, or where processes are described as having, including or comprising specific process steps, it is contemplated that compositions of the present teachings also consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that the processes of the present teachings also consist essentially of, or consist of, the recited process steps.
In the application, where an element or component is said to be included in and/or selected from a list of recited elements or components, it should be understood that the element or component can be any one of the recited elements or components and can be selected from a group consisting of two or more of the recited elements or components. Further, it should be understood that elements and/or features of a composition, an apparatus, or a method described herein can be combined in a variety of ways without departing from the spirit and scope of the present teachings, whether explicit or implicit herein.
The use of the terms “include,” “includes,” “including,” “have,” “has,” or “having” should be generally understood as open-ended and non-limiting unless specifically stated otherwise.
The use of the singular herein includes the plural (and vice versa) unless specifically stated otherwise. Moreover, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In addition, where the use of the term “about” is before a quantitative value, the present teachings also include the specific quantitative value itself, unless specifically stated otherwise.
It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain actions is immaterial so long as the present teachings remain operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.
Where a range or list of values is provided, each intervening value between the upper and lower limits of that range or list of values is individually contemplated and is encompassed within the disclosure as if each value were specifically enumerated herein. In addition, smaller ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range are contemplated and encompassed within the disclosure. The listing of exemplary values or ranges is not a disclaimer of other values or ranges between and including the upper and lower limits of a given range.
It should be appreciated that various aspects of the claimed disclosure are directed to subsets and substeps of the techniques disclosed herein. Further, the terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure claimed. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the disclosure as defined and differentiated in the following claims, including all equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4548473 | Lo et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465147 | Swanson | Nov 1995 | A |
5509093 | Miller et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518810 | Nishihara et al. | May 1996 | A |
5586201 | Whiting et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5619368 | Swanson | Apr 1997 | A |
5632767 | Sinofsky | May 1997 | A |
5643253 | Baxter et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715827 | Corl et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5748598 | Swanson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784352 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5822391 | Whitting | Oct 1998 | A |
5908415 | Sinofsky | Jun 1999 | A |
5947959 | Sinofsky | Sep 1999 | A |
5965355 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6111645 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134003 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160826 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6191862 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195445 | Jolly et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6270492 | Sinofsky | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282011 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302875 | Makower et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6348960 | Etori et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6421164 | Tearney et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445939 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501551 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552796 | Magnin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564087 | Pitris et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565514 | Svanerudh et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570659 | Schmitt | May 2003 | B2 |
6692824 | Benz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706004 | Tearney et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718089 | James et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728566 | Subramanyan et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731973 | Voith | May 2004 | B2 |
6760112 | Reed et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6879851 | McNamara et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891984 | Petersen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6932809 | Sinofsky | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937696 | Mostafavi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6942657 | Sinofsky et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973202 | Mostafavi | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974557 | Webler et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7068831 | Florent et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7134994 | Alpert et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7191100 | Mostafavi | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208333 | Flanders et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231243 | Tearney et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241286 | Atlas | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7298478 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301644 | Knighton et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7321677 | Evron et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7355699 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7408648 | Kleen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412141 | Gowda et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414779 | Huber et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415049 | Flanders et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
RE40608 | Glover et al. | Dec 2008 | E |
7492522 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7576861 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593559 | Toth et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7625366 | Atlas | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7697972 | Verard et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711413 | Feldman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729746 | Redel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742797 | Redel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783337 | Feldman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792342 | Barbu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813609 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848791 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853316 | Milner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869663 | Buckland et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7872759 | Tearney et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7916387 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918793 | Altmann et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925327 | Weese | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930014 | Huennekens et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935060 | Schmitt et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967743 | Ishihara | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7988633 | Hossack et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7991105 | Mielekamp et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029447 | Kanz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8116605 | Petersen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8206374 | Duane et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206377 | Petroff | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8259303 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8290228 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298147 | Huennekens et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8325419 | Schmitt | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351665 | Tearney et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358461 | Huber et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8412312 | Judell et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423121 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449468 | Petersen et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457375 | Rieber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457440 | Johnson | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8463007 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478384 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8478387 | Xu | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503844 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542900 | Tolkowsky et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556820 | Alpert et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562537 | Alpert et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571639 | Mostafavi | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581643 | Schmitt | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8582109 | Schmitt | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8582619 | Adler | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582934 | Adler et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8670603 | Tolkowsky et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687201 | Adler | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8693756 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700130 | Iddan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8781193 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786336 | Schmitt | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8831321 | Elbasiony | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8855744 | Tolkowsky et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8909323 | Baumgart | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8913084 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948228 | Adler | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8953911 | Xu et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
20020161351 | Samson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040006277 | Langenhove et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050043614 | Huizenga et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050201662 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060095065 | Tanimura et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241465 | Huennekens | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264743 | Kleen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070024617 | Poole | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027390 | Maschke et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066890 | Maschke | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080194996 | Kassab | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221439 | Iddan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221440 | Iddan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221442 | Tolkowsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080283771 | Li | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090174931 | Huber et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090306520 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100076320 | Petersen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100157041 | Klaiman et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160764 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160773 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161022 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161023 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172556 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191102 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100222671 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228076 | Blank et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290693 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110071404 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101207 | Schmitt | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157686 | Huber et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190586 | Kemp | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110228280 | Schmitt et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230758 | Eichler | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110319752 | Steinberg | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004529 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120004537 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029339 | Cohen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075638 | Rollins et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120162660 | Kemp | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120310081 | Adler et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120224751 | Kemp et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238869 | Schmitt et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250028 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300215 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300216 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006105 | Furuichi | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010303 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130012811 | Schmitt et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023761 | Petroff | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051728 | Petroff | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130072805 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123616 | Merritt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130281832 | Baumgart et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310698 | Judell et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140018669 | Xu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140024931 | Winston et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140094660 | Tolkowsky | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094689 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094691 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094692 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094693 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094697 | Petroff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100451 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107479 | Klaiman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114182 | Petersen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114184 | Klaiman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114185 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142427 | Petroff | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142432 | Hutchins et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142436 | Hutchins et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140187920 | Millett et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140187929 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218210 | De Jong et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140218742 | Adler | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249407 | Adler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268167 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270445 | Kemp | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276011 | Schmitt et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309536 | Douk et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140379269 | Schmitt | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150141808 | Elhawary | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63-127201 | May 1988 | JP |
2010-148778 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2012-130680 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013-537444 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2012176191 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013175472 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014002095 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shengxian Tu et al., “In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography”, Int. J. Cardiovasc Imaging (2012) 28:1315-1327. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed from the International Searching Authority dated Jun. 27, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2013/030623 (17 pages). |
Dave Fornell, “The Advantages and Disadvantages of OCT vs. IVUS”, Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology, May 18, 2011, pp. 1-4. |
Palti-Wasserman et al., “Identifying and Tracking a Guide Wire in the Coronary Arteries During Angioplasty from X-Ray Images”, IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 44:2, Feb. 1997, pp. 152-164. |
Perez-Rovira et al., “Deformable Registration of Retinal Fluorescein Angiogram Sequences Using Vasculature Structures”, 32nd Annual Conf. of IEEE EMBS, 2010, pp. 4383-4386. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/042849 mailed from the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 2, 2015 (16 pages). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2015/042849 issued from the International Bureau of WIPO dated Mar. 14, 2017 (11 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012701, dated May 14, 2009 (10 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012701, dated May 14, 2009 (7 pages). |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012701, dated May 18, 2010 (10 pages). |
Annex to Form PCT/ISA206 Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for International Application No. PCT/US2008/012701, dated Feb. 27, 2009 (3 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2013/078500, dated Jul. 8, 2014 (14 pages). |
Tung et al., “Automatic Detection of Coronary Stent Struts in Intravascular OCT Imaging”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8315, Feb. 22, 2012 (8 pages). |
JP 2017-534518, Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal, dated May 14, 2019, (5 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160073885 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |