This disclosure relates generally to advertising, and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to generate market segmentation data with anonymous location data.
In recent years, marketers have collected personal information from consumers to aid marketing efforts toward those and similarly situated consumers. Consumer personal information typically includes address information, telephone number information and/or zip code information. Such personal information has typically been collected by marketers through surveys, promotions and/or retailer programs associated with a retailer that provide a consumer benefit in exchange for consumer address information. Retailer programs may include consumer shopping cards (e.g., “preferred customer cards”) that are barcode scanned at a checkout of the retailer to allow one or more purchased items to be discounted. Other retailer programs may include merchandise and/or cash incentives based on the amount of purchases made at the retailer store and/or retailer chain.
Example methods and apparatus are disclosed to generate market segmentation data with anonymous location data. A disclosed example method involves receiving geographic location information associated with a mobile phone user, associating the geographic location information with an identifier unrelated to personal information associated with the mobile phone user, identifying a home location associated with the geographic location information, and associating segmentation information with the identifier based on the home location and without referencing personal information of the mobile phone user.
Consumers that provide personal information to a merchant, retailer, and/or marketing entity typically do so in view of a quid-pro-quo benefit. As used herein, merchants, retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers and/or marketing entities will be referred to generally as “marketers.” Benefits expected and/or otherwise received by the consumers include, but are not limited to, in-store discounts, reward points, cash back, coupons, early purchase opportunities and/or marketer event information (e.g., e-mail event notifications).
The personal information provided by the consumer may include, but is not limited to, an address, a home telephone number, a wireless telephone number, demographic information, gender, income, occupation, e-mail address, etc. After the consumer provides such information, the marketers may use this information to better tailor advertisements in a manner appreciated and/or otherwise requested by the consumer. In some examples, knowledge of the consumer's demographic information and occupation allows the marketers to tailor one or more advertisements to interests the consumer is likely to have, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of the advertising campaign(s).
The marketer may employ one or more consumer segmentation service to map one or more likely market segment types to the consumer based on the consumer's disclosed home address. An example consumer segmentation system includes the Potential Rating Index for Zip Markets (PRIZM) by Nielsen®. PRIZM® provides a standardized set of characteristics, referred to as clusters, for each zip code in the United States. In some instances, PRIZM® provides characteristics for different granularities, such as block groups (e.g., greater than 10 households, but less than a zip code), ZIP+4 (e.g., approximately 10 parcels/households) and ZIP+6 (e.g., a specific address, sometimes referred to as a delivery point code). Block groups and zip+4 information may be digitally stored and reflect a polygon shape when applied to a geographic map. Each zip code (e.g., ZIP, ZIP+4, ZIP+6, block group, etc.) is associated with one or more of sixty-six (66) demographically and behaviorally distinct segments. The segment(s) associated with each household provides information indicative of likes, dislikes, lifestyles, purchase behaviors and/or media preferences. As such, marketers may utilize address information with one or more PRIZM® services to reveal an associated segment most likely associated with the provided address information, thereby allowing the marketer to more accurately tailor one or more advertisements to the associated consumer at that address.
In other examples, consumers may be reluctant to provide personal information, regardless of the quid-pro-quo benefit (e.g., discount, coupon, points, cash-back, etc.) provided by the marketer. Consumer concerns may include a lack of trust, a belief that the personal information provided to the marketer will result in nuisance activity (e.g., unwanted telephone calls (e.g., telemarketing), unwanted mail) and/or a general discomfort with sharing information that the consumer believes is personal. In still other examples, consumers may be particularly reluctant to disclose a wireless (e.g., cellular phones) telephone number for fear that one or more text messaging marketing campaigns may consume a text message quota of the consumer. As such, marketers may face challenges when attempting to market consumers via their wireless telephone.
While wireless smartphones include applications that are cost-free to the consumer based on advertisements displayed thereon, such advertisements are not tailored to specific characteristics of the consumer. In some examples, the advertisements presented to the consumer are based on their current location determined by global positioning satellite (GPS) functionality and/or cell tower location (e.g., triangulation) techniques. Advertisements based on current location information may allow the marketer to tailor advertisements related to merchants/retailers/wholesalers in the consumer's vicinity. However, such advertising efforts still fail to reflect other characteristics of the consumer (e.g., annual income, general preferred vehicle types, etc.) unless that consumer has also relinquished his/her personal information.
Example methods and apparatus described herein allow, in part, marketing information to be generated based on location information devoid of personal information. The marketing information generated by example methods and apparatus described herein is indicative of consumer characteristics and is generated without requiring the consumer to input personal information. Instead, example methods and apparatus described herein employ consumer GPS location data aggregated over a period of time to identify a likely location of the consumer's home/residence and/or a likely location of the consumer's place of employment. After determining a home location based on aggregated GPS information, the associated ZIP, block group, ZIP+4 and/or ZIP+6 is identified and provided to a market segmentation system (e.g., PRIZM®). The market segmentation system (e.g., PRIZM®) returns one or more segments that are likely associated with the home address.
As described above, PRIZM® includes sixty-six (66) segments indicative of traits/characteristics of the household member(s) associated with an address or location provided by the marketer. For example, the “Young Digerati” segment describes consumers that are the nation's tech-savvy singles and couples living in fashionable neighborhoods on an urban fringe. Such consumers are highly educated and ethnically mixed. “Young Digerati” communities are typically filled with trendy apartments and condos, fitness clubs, clothing boutiques, casual restaurants, juice bars, coffee bars and microbreweries. When the marketer learns that a consumer fits within this segment, then that marketer may better tailor one or more advertisements and/or advertising campaigns to improve advertising efficiency and/or effectiveness.
In some examples, the consumer installs an application on their wireless telephone without providing any personal information (e.g., a phone number, an address, etc.). In some examples, the application obtains an identifier, such as an international mobile equipment identity (IMEI) number from the wireless device, performs a hash on the identifier (e.g., the IMEI number) to prevent one or more opportunities to personally identify the consumer, and then captures GPS data over a period of time. The captured GPS data is associated with the hash of the identifier (e.g., the hash of the IMEI) and, thus, the user may be tracked without revealing the identity or identification information of the user. Preferably, the identifier does not permit such personal information to be derived.
While the GPS data is captured over the period of time, one or more algorithms may be executed to determine GPS coordinates that are likely associated with the user's home, the user's place of work, the user's travel route(s) and/or the user's leisure location(s). For example, one or more patterns may be identified based on GPS locations at a particular time-of-day, GPS locations near industrial areas, GPS locations near city areas, GPS locations near rural areas, GPS locations near residential areas, GPS locations near known tourist areas, etc. In the event that a number of GPS location data points are captured during hours typical of employment (e.g., between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM during weekdays), then the GPS location data points may be associated with a work location. On the other hand, in the event that a number of GPS location data points are captured during hours associated with rest or recreation (e.g., between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM), then the GPS location data points may be associated with a home location. Further, in the event that a number of GPS location data points are captured that form a path repeated over a number of days during times typically associated with traveling between employment and recreation sites, then the GPS location data points may be associated with a home/work traveling route. In still further examples, in the event that a number of GPS location data points are captured for a number of weekend days in areas known to be vacation destinations, then the associated GPS location data points may be associated with leisure activities for the user associated with the hashed IMEI number.
For some examples, an indication of whether a captured GPS location data point is to be associated with a home location, a work location, a travel-route location, a leisure activity location, or a vacation location may be based on, in part, the type of application that provides the GPS location data point(s) and/or the type of application(s) executing on the wireless device when the GPS location data point(s) are captured. For example, in the event that a GPS navigation application is executing on the wireless device, then one or more source locations or destination locations may be ruled out as home or work under the assumption that both home and work locations are typically known to the user. Instead, the source and/or destination locations may be associated with leisure activities. For other examples, in the event that a stock trading or financial streaming application is executing on the wireless device when the GPS location data point(s) are captured, then the user's location may be deemed to be a work location. In still further examples, in the event that a game application or a movie viewing application is executing on the wireless device when the GPS location data point(s) are captured, then the user may be deemed traveling, such as by way of car, taxi, train, etc.
Although the aforementioned examples involve an example application executing on a wireless telephone, the methods and apparatus described herein may be implemented with GPS location data points acquired from any other source(s). In some examples, GPS location data points may be acquired by a marketer via a privately maintained customer list, or data points collected from GPS devices (e.g., a car-mounted GPS navigation system). Preferably, the GPS location data points are separated from indicators that may reveal personal information associated with the users. For example, while a wireless telephone company may have abundant detail related to their customers (e.g., IMEI number, telephone number, home address, social security number, work address, work telephone number, etc.), the wireless telephone company is not likely to release and/or sell such personal information for profit due to legal privacy obligations and customer goodwill. However, the wireless telephone company may sell and/or otherwise provide innocuous identifiers (e.g., hashed IMEI numbers) having associated GPS location data points that are neither associated with personal customer data nor capable of being used to derive personal customer data.
After the captured GPS location data points have been analyzed to identify likely locations associated with a user's home, work, travel and/or leisure locations, such locations are segregated and the corresponding home location is provided to a segmentation system to identify a corresponding customer segment. As described above, the PRIZM® methodology may be used to identify one or more of sixty-six (66) customer segments associated with a zip code, a block group (e.g., block groups defined by U.S. Census data), a zip+4 (e.g., a 9-digit number associated with approximately 40 million U.S. households), a zip+6 (e.g., an 11-digit number associated with approximately 120 million households). Customer segments may include, but are not limited to “Upper Crust” (e.g., the nation's most exclusive addresses, wealthiest lifestyles), “Beltway Boomers” (e.g., household adult members of the postwar baby boom, upper-middle-class, home owners), and/or “New Empty Nests” (e.g., households where grown-up children have recently moved out, upscale older Americans that pursue active lifestyles, no interest in rest-home retirement yet over 65-years old).
The one or more likely segments are associated with the home location so that one or more marketing efforts may yield improved results to the household. For example, in the event that the user uses the application on their wireless telephone when in a store (e.g., Best Buy), the hashed IMEI number is used to identify the user's likely segment type. Based on the likely segment type, the user may be presented with advertisements, coupons and/or promotions that are tailored to that user in view of segment characteristics.
In operation, the example segmentation application 114 may invoke one or more functions of the wireless device 102 to capture a GPS location in a periodic, aperiodic, scheduled or manual manner. In the illustrated example of
One or more GPS location data points may be eliminated from consideration as the home location 116, the work location 118 or the leisure location 120 when trend analysis and/or filters are not indicative of locations where the user is either at home, at work and/or on vacation. For example, some locations are identified as commuting and/or travel locations based on reoccurring patterns of location. A home/work travel route 122 is identified based on a number of GPS location data points that occur at a similar time every work day.
GPS location data points received by the segmentation application 114 via the segmentation application interface 306 are stored in the location database 310 and associated with the hashed value generated by the privacy manager 302. As such, the user of the wireless device 102 is never at risk of being identified, yet GPS location data points collected from the users are consistently associated with the unique hash value over time to identify one or more trends, a home location, a work location and/or a leisure location of the user of the wireless device 102. In some examples, the privacy manager 302 may be located on, or otherwise be executed by the mobile device 102, such as within the segmentation application 114.
The example GPS data analyzer 304 analyzes GPS location data points stored in the example location database 310 associated with the hashed identifier so that locations of interest can be identified, such as a home location, a work location, a leisure location and/or locations indicative of travel routes to/from home/work. As described above, logic may be employed to automatically identify locations of interest. The logic may, for example, identify the GPS location data points for a given identifier over a period of time to identify a threshold number of locations during a certain time-of-day. For example, GPS location data points repeatedly occurring in a first location at 8:00 PM every day may be indicative of a home location, while GPS location data points repeatedly occurring in a second location at 1:00 PM every day may be indicative of a work location. In still other examples, the GPS data analyzer 304 may receive the GPS location data points with an indication of other applications are executing on the wireless device 102. Such indications of applications may be used by the GPS data analyzer 304 as hints to determine whether the wireless device 102 is at a home location, a work location or one or more locations indicative of travel. In the event that the GPS data analyzer 304 identifies GPS location data points repeatedly occurring in a series of locations occurring, for example, between 8:15 AM and 8:45 AM while a crossword puzzle application is being used by the wireless device 102, then the GPS data analyzer 304 may identify such series of locations as indicative of instances of travel by the user of the wireless device 102.
After one or more locations of interest (e.g., a home location) are associated with a hashed identifier, the example segmentation system 308 matches the home location with marketing segmentation data. While the illustrated example of
While an example manner of implementing the system to generate market segmentation data with anonymous location data 100 of
A flowchart representative of example machine readable instructions for implementing the segmentation manager 112 of
As mentioned above, the example process of
The program 400 of
The example segmentation application interface 306 receives the one or more GPS location data points from the segmentation manager interface 202, and also receives one or more identifiers from the wireless device 102 (block 404). As described above, the one or more identifiers may include, but are not limited to, one or more of an IMEI number, a phone number, and/or a user identifier. The example privacy manager 302 performs a hash on the identifier received from the wireless device 102 and associates the hash with the one or more GPS location data points (block 406) to prevent any personal consumer information from being disclosed and/or derived.
To determine which of the one or more received GPS location data points are associated with the user's home location, the example GPS data analyzer 304 analyzes the GPS location data points to identify one or more patterns indicative of home (block 408). A home location of the user of the wireless device 102 may be determined based on, for example, a threshold number of instances where the wireless device 102 is located at a first GPS location data point during a particular time of day (e.g., between midnight and 5:00 AM). The home location is associated with a corresponding zip code, a zip+4, a zip+6, a block group and/or a centroid (block 410). In some examples, the GPS location data point(s) (e.g., latitude and longitude coordinates) are translated by the example segmentation manager 112 to a zip+4 value or a zip+6 value (an address). However, in other examples, a translation to the zip+6 may not be preferred to maintain user privacy and, instead, a zip+4 value may be used. In the event the GPS location data point(s) do not directly translate to a zip+4, the segmentation manager 112 may select a centroid of a polygon of addresses closest to a zip+4 value of the polygon. If the corresponding zip code, zip+4, zip+6, block group and/or centroid is indicative of a residential area and/or residential address (block 412), then the example segmentation system 308 associates the home location with a corresponding population segmentation type (e.g., one of 66 types described above) (block 414).
One or more advertisements, marketing promotions and/or other marketing efforts are directed to the hashed identifier in a manner tailored based on the corresponding population segmentation type (block 416). For example, the example segmentation application 114 may broadcast the hashed identifier from the wireless device 102 when the user enters a retail establishment (e.g., Best Buy). The retail establishment may invoke an advertising system that, upon receiving the anonymous hashed identifier, pushes one or more advertisements, coupons and/or other marketing information to the user of the wireless device 102 in a manner tailored to their corresponding population segmentation type, thereby improving the effectiveness of the advertising attempt(s).
The processor platform P100 of the example of
The processor P105 is in communication with the main memory (including a ROM P120 and/or the RAM P115) via a bus P125. The RAM P115 may be implemented by dynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), and/or any other type of RAM device, and ROM may be implemented by flash memory and/or any other desired type of memory device. Access to the memory P115 and the memory P120 may be controlled by a memory controller (not shown).
The processor platform P100 also includes an interface circuit P130. The interface circuit P130 may be implemented by any type of interface standard, such as an external memory interface, serial port, general-purpose input/output, etc. One or more input devices P135 and one or more output devices P140 are connected to the interface circuit P130. The interface circuit P130 can be implemented by, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a touchscreen, a track-pad, a trackball, isopoint and/or a voice recognition system. The output devices P140 can be implemented, for example, by display devices (e.g., a liquid crystal display, a cathode ray tube display (CRT), a light-emitting-diode (LED) display, a printer and/or speakers).
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the above disclosed methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture permit consumer segmentation type identification without the use of consumer personal identification information and without such personal identification information being disclosed and/or derived, thereby maintaining consumer privacy.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the claims of this patent.
This patent is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/896,761, filed Jun. 9, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,170,410, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/536,826, filed Aug. 9, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,713,687, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/002,716, filed Jun. 7, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,380,643, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/438,344, filed Feb. 21, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,996,855, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/591,205, filed Jan. 7, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,613,363, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/721,321, filed Dec. 20, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,954,090, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/868,420, filed Aug. 25, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,340,685, entitled “Methods, Systems and Apparatus to Generate Market Segmentation Data with Anonymous Location Data,” all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4099591 | Carr | Jul 1978 | A |
4361851 | Asip et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4973952 | Malec et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4990892 | Guest et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014206 | Scribner et al. | May 1991 | A |
5119104 | Heller | Jun 1992 | A |
5214687 | Känsäkoski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5233642 | Renton | Aug 1993 | A |
5241534 | Omuro et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5287266 | Malec et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5319638 | Lin | Jun 1994 | A |
5345392 | Mito et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5444745 | Ali-Vehmas | Aug 1995 | A |
5483468 | Chen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497373 | Hulen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5521907 | Ennis, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5603095 | Uola | Feb 1997 | A |
5642353 | Roy, III et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5675510 | Coffey et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692215 | Kutzik et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5799154 | Kuriyan | Aug 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5859838 | Soliman | Jan 1999 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5978657 | Suzuki | Nov 1999 | A |
5987306 | Nilsen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
5991806 | McHann, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6091956 | Hollenberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6108637 | Blumenau | Aug 2000 | A |
6115680 | Coffee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138147 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144944 | Kurtzman, II et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6226272 | Okano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301471 | Dahm et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6353929 | Houston | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397256 | Chan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405245 | Burson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405251 | Bullard et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470386 | Combar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477580 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480497 | Flammer, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516189 | Frangione et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526413 | Schwitters et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6581025 | Lehman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606605 | Kolls | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6647269 | Hendrey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6745011 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757543 | Moran et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763458 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792457 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807515 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816886 | Elvanoglu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834308 | Ikezoye et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837436 | Swartz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840861 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6879960 | Nascenzi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883168 | James et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6912507 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920550 | Des li | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928280 | Xanthos et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6968178 | Pradhan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970131 | Percy et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973491 | Staveley et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6999715 | Hayter et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010107 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013136 | Frangione et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7072640 | Bernhart | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093243 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127261 | Van Erlach | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149549 | Ortiz et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155210 | Benson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171157 | Lee | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181519 | Pillai et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194758 | Waki et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7206647 | Kumar | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209473 | Mohaban et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7227498 | Soliman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7319847 | Xanthos et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320070 | Baum | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356590 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392310 | Motoyama et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7426717 | Schang et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7441246 | Auerbach et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474645 | Lundin | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478099 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7479899 | Horstemeyer | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7504966 | Horstemeyer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523191 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7548915 | Ramer et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551922 | Roskowski et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555571 | Skinner | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7561069 | Horstemeyer | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562367 | Arad | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7609650 | Roskowski et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623823 | Zito et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627872 | Hebeler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7680802 | Kato | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689521 | Nodelman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693817 | Dumais et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733799 | Kalliola et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742762 | Biere et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7751385 | Monk et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756829 | Bhanote | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769633 | Lokinen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7861225 | Lee | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7899915 | Reisman | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7949677 | Croft et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954150 | Croft et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8010679 | Low et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014726 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8051180 | Mazzaferri et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073565 | Johnson | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8161172 | Reisman | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185351 | Crystal et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8214429 | Chidel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260252 | Agarwal | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291453 | Boortz | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8321556 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8340685 | Cochran et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8363650 | Rao et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8489669 | Johnson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8538343 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549133 | Vaver | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8812012 | Besehanic et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8954090 | Cochran et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9008586 | Petersen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9148458 | Verkasalo | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9203642 | Chatterjee et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9613363 | Cochran et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9996855 | Cochran et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10078846 | Besehanic et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10380643 | Cochran | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10685365 | Besehanic et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10713687 | Cochran et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10956923 | Besehanic et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11170410 | Cochran et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11556946 | Besehanic et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
20010028301 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047291 | Garahi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002504 | Engel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025795 | Sharon et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046090 | Stewart | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049968 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069037 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072966 | Elderding et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112048 | Gruyer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020160758 | Pradhan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186818 | Arnaud et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036949 | Kaddeche et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054757 | Kolessar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030115586 | Lejouan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149743 | Baluja et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177488 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182567 | Barton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040122939 | Perkins | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133672 | Bhattacharya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040243587 | Nuyens et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260470 | Rast | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267694 | Sakai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050136903 | Kashima et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144632 | Mears et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155019 | Levine et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216509 | Kolessar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216844 | Error et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060004627 | Baluja | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019723 | Vorenkamp et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060129972 | Tyburski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184625 | Nordvik et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218533 | Koduru et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060270401 | Frangione et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294225 | Grecco et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011040 | Wright et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038516 | Apple et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070112739 | Burns et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150599 | Neogi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070260475 | Bhanote | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288277 | Neuhauser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288476 | Flanagan, III et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294057 | Crystal et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294132 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294705 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294706 | Neuhauser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002677 | Bugenhagen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080076506 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101552 | Khan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109295 | McConochie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126420 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140479 | Mello et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189411 | Motoyama et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215428 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243822 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090019182 | Riise et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090132559 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138447 | Kalavade | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138593 | Kalavade | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187463 | DaCosta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187939 | Lajoie | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090262919 | Schoenberg | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090307263 | Skibiski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004997 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030785 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100079336 | Skibiski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082301 | Skibiski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100419 | Natoli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125657 | Dowling et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100151816 | Besehanic et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100205220 | Hart et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205301 | Ansari et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211996 | McGeehan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100262461 | Bohannon | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279665 | Hardin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110035284 | Moshfeghi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110087975 | Karsten | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110153390 | Harris | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153423 | Elvekrog et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110314084 | Saretto et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110321035 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036034 | Golden et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052871 | Cochran et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072469 | Perez et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120102169 | Yu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120121043 | Wambacq | May 2012 | A1 |
20120260278 | Lambert et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130094399 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103764 | Verkasalo | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110634 | Cochran et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140019203 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140095320 | Sivaramakrishnan et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140237595 | Sridhara et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140358640 | Besehanic et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150127427 | Cochran et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20170161788 | Cochran et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180349958 | Cochran et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190095938 | Besehanic et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200005358 | Cochran et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200372542 | Cochran et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200380542 | Besehanic et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210295360 | Besehanic et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1776694 | May 2006 | CN |
101040242 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101124578 | Feb 2008 | CN |
0849909 | Jun 1998 | EP |
2204766 | Jul 2010 | EP |
H11259422 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000222314 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001056805 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001103086 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2005148289 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006012144 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2007249306 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2009245019 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009251743 | Oct 2009 | JP |
9826541 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9843455 | Oct 1998 | WO |
0079449 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0154034 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0217612 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0219625 | Mar 2002 | WO |
02073885 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02098029 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03021463 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2006040740 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006098414 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2008118119 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009091606 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009094397 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010019925 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/FI2010/050548, dated Dec. 28, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/FI2010/050548, dated Mar. 15, 2011, 10 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010355789, dated Jul. 22, 2014, 3 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2013-515934, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 10 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2013-515934, dated Feb. 18, 2014, 17 pages. |
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection,” issued in connection with Japanese Patent Application No. P2013-515934, dated Nov. 4, 2014, 5 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Notification of the First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080068453.8, dated Mar. 20, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,190, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,255 dated Dec. 18, 2015, 6 pages. |
Korea Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Rejection,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7001922, dated Feb. 18, 2016, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09015497.2, dated Feb. 25, 2016, 7 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al., “A Comparison of Mechanisms for Improving TCP Performance over Wireless Links,” ACM SIGCOMM '96, Stanford, CA, Aug. 1996, 14 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2008/056282, dated Aug. 21, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2007/080235, dated Aug. 25, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2007/080235, dated Apr. 7, 2009, 7 pages. |
Jain et al. “Congestion Avoidance in Computer Networks with a Connectionless Network Layer,” Digital Equipment Corporation, 1988, Version Jun. 1, 1997, 21 pages. |
Ko, “Automatic Call Generation and Analysis—Network Testing and Cellularsurvey Tools,” Making Life Easier-Network Design and Management Tools, Digest No. 1996/217, Oct. 10, 1996, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Jun. 23, 2011, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Nov. 15, 2010, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Mar. 22, 2012, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Jan. 19, 2012, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Jul. 30, 2012, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Requirement for Restriction/Election,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/825,933, dated Sep. 2, 2010, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,689 dated Apr. 2, 2015, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,689 dated Aug. 18, 2015, 5 pages. |
Vucetic et al., “Network Management Applications for Wireless Local Loop,” Electrotechnical Conference, vol. 2, May 1998, 5 pages. |
Battelle Transportation Division, “Global Positioning Systems for Personal Travel Surveys—Lexington Area Travel Data Collection Test,” Final Report to Office of Highway Information Management (HPM-40), Office of Technology Application (HTA-1), Federal Highway Administration, Sep. 1997, 92 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,420,238, dated Aug. 23, 2010, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,420,238, dated Feb. 8, 2010, 2 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,420,238, dated Mar. 24, 2009, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, dated Feb. 24, 2006, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, dated Oct. 16, 2006, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, dated May 9, 2008, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, dated Mar. 9, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, dated Mar. 28, 2012, 4 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 01968369.7, mailed Mar. 20, 2015, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10012853.7, dated Mar. 17, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10012853.7, dated May 21, 2012, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10012853.7, dated Mar. 16, 2015, 4 pages. |
Hilbert et al., “An Approach to Large-Scale Collection of Application Usage Data Over the Internet,” Software Engineering, 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference, Kyoto, Japan, Apr. 10, 1998, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2001/027235, completed Jan. 25, 2004, 4 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2001/027235, dated Jul. 18, 2002, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2002/027631, dated Dec. 9, 2002, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2008207615, dated Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2002332740, dated Apr. 23, 2007, 2 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011203048, dated Mar. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2011203048, dated May 30, 2014, 3 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 1,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2013203793, dated May 16, 2014, 4 pages. |
Lettieri et al., “Advances in Wireless Terminals,” IEEE Personal Communications, IEEE Communications Society, US, vol. 6, No. 1, Feb. 1, 1999, 14 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Notification of the First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 01816436.6, dated Dec. 9, 2005, 7 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Notification of the First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 200910145321.x, dated Nov. 16, 2011, 6 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080068453.8, dated Jan. 6, 2016, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/944,843, dated Aug. 23, 2003, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/944,843, dated Mar. 8, 2004, 7 pages. |
Woo et al., “Providing Internet Services to Mobile Phones: A Case Study with Email,” Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 1998, The Ninth IEEE International Symposium, Boston, MA, vol. 1, Sep. 8, 1998, Abstract Only, 2 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report No. 2,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010355789, dated Mar. 9, 2016, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 10853568.3, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Chinese Patent Application No. 201080068453.8, dated Apr. 6, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/852,255, dated May 18, 2016, 31 pages. |
IP Australia, “Patent Examination Report No. 3,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010355789, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/806,820 dated May 12, 2015, 15 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Office Communication,” issued in connection with European Patent Application Serial No. 09015497.2, dated Feb. 17, 2011, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09015497.2, dated Apr. 8, 2010, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Sep. 24, 2012, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Apr. 6, 2012, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Nov. 18, 2011, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Jun. 21, 2011, 15 pages. |
Claritas, “Prizm NE Methodology Summary,” Claritas, Inc., 2004, retrieved from <http://www.tetrad.com/pub/prices/PRIZMNE_Methodology.pdf>, retrieved on May 3, 2011, 7 pages. |
Claritas, “Prizm NE Segments,” Claritas, Inc., retrieved from <http://www.tetrad.com/pub/documents/pnesegments.pdf>, retrieved on May 3, 2011, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,420, dated Aug. 27, 2012, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,420, dated Dec. 9, 2011, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/654,486, dated Feb. 3, 2004, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 09/654,486, dated May 27, 2003, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated May 10, 2013, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Nov. 27, 2013, 30 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,338, dated Apr. 7, 2014, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,321, dated Apr. 1, 2013, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,321, dated Nov. 1, 2013, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,321, dated Sep. 30, 2014, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 13/806,820, dated Jan. 15, 2015, 5 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,190, dated Sep. 22, 2016, 22 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Examiner's Report,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,803,661, dated Aug. 5, 2016, 4 pages. |
Korean Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7001922, dated Jun. 29, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,205, dated Jan. 25, 2016, 35 pages. |
IP Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2010355789, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,205, dated Jul. 20, 2016, 60 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,205, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,205, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 39 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,190, dated Aug. 25, 2017, 30 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,344, dated Feb. 13, 2018, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,344, dated Nov. 1, 2017, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/438,344, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/002,716, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/002,716, dated Oct. 12, 2018, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/536,826, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/536,826, dated Mar. 12, 2020, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Corrected Notice of Allowability,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/536,826, dated May 8, 2020, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/896,761, dated Jul. 13, 2021, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/896,761, dated Feb. 22, 2021, 10 pages. |
Boulos, “Location Based Health Information Services: A New Paradigm in Personalised Information Delivery,” BioMed Central, International Journal of Health Geographies, Jan. 10, 2003, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/901,969, dated Nov. 18, 2020, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings,” issued in connection with European Application No. 09015497.2, dated May 14, 2018, 11 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Decision to Refuse,” in connection with European Patent Application No. 09015497.2, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 15 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09015497.2, dated Jul. 7, 2022, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication of the Board of Appeal Pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal,” issued in connection with European Patent Application No. 09015497.2, dated Jan. 20, 2023, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,190, dated Jan. 24, 2018, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,190, dated May 14, 2018, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/112,366, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/112,366, dated Feb. 11, 2020, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/208,709, dated Jul. 27, 2022, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/208,709, dated Nov. 21, 2022, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220058692 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16896761 | Jun 2020 | US |
Child | 17520420 | US | |
Parent | 16536826 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 16896761 | US | |
Parent | 16002716 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16536826 | US | |
Parent | 15438344 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16002716 | US | |
Parent | 14591205 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15438344 | US | |
Parent | 13721321 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14591205 | US | |
Parent | 12868420 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13721321 | US |