The subject matter described herein includes methods and systems for implementing and communicating between Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) entities. More particularly, the subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer program products for clustering and communicating between IMS entities.
Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) is defined by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) as a new mobile network infrastructure that enables the convergence of data, speech, and mobile network technology over an IP-based infrastructure. IMS bridges the gap between the existing traditional telecommunications technology and Internet technology, allowing network operators to offer a standardized, reusable platform with new, innovative services by enhancing real time, multimedia mobile services, such as voice services, video telephony, messaging, conferencing, and push services. IMS can be used to provide services for both mobile networks and landline networks at the same time, providing unique mixtures of services with transparency to the end-user.
The main function of IMS is to set up media communication sessions between users and between users and applications. IMS supports the establishment of any type of media session (e.g., voice, video, text, etc.) and provides the service creator the ability to combine services in the same session and dynamically modify sessions “on the fly” (e.g., adding a video component to an existing voice session). As a result, new and innovative user-to-user and multi-user services become available, such as enhanced voice services, video telephony, chat, push-to-talk, and multimedia conferencing, all of which are based on the concept of a multimedia session. The underlying IMS infrastructure enables mobile IP communication services via its ability to find a user in the network and then to establish a session with the user. The key IMS components enabling mobility management are the call session control function (CSCF) and home subscriber server (HSS). The CSCF is essentially a proxy, which aids in the setup and management of sessions and forwards messages between IMS networks. The HSS holds all of the key subscriber information and enables users (or servers) to find and communicate with other end users.
IMS uses session initiation protocol (SIP) for multimedia session negotiation and session management. For example, SIP REGISTER and INVITE messages are used for communication between P-CSCF 102, I-CSCF 114, and S-CSCF 116 in
P-CSCF 102 is the first contact point within the IMS and behaves like a proxy. The P-CSCF 102 forwards a SIP REGISTER request received from the subscriber's user equipment (UE) (not shown) via GGSN 104, SGSN 106, and RAN 108 to I-CSCF 114, whose identity is determined using the home domain name, as provided by the UE. After registration is performed, SIP messages concerning the registered subscriber are forwarded to S-CSCF 116, whose identity P-CSCF 102 received as a result of the registration procedure. P-CSCF 102 also forwards SIP requests or responses to the UE, generates call detail records (CDRs), maintains a security association between itself and each UE, performs SIP message compression and decompression, and authorizes bearer resources and QoS management.
I-CSCF 114 is the contact point within the subscriber's home network 110 for all communication sessions destined for the subscriber or for a roaming subscriber currently located within that network operator's service area. I-CSCF 114 locates and assigns S-CSCF 116 to a user initiating SIP registration, routes a SIP request received from another network to S-CSCF 116, obtains the address of S-CSCF 116 from HSS 112 and forwards the SIP request or response to the S-CSCF 116.
S-CSCF 116 performs the session control services for the UE and maintains session state as needed by the network operator for support of the services. S-CSCF 116 accepts registration requests, obtains IMS subscription information from HSS 112, and provides session control. S-CSCF 116 also acts as a proxy server, i.e., it accepts requests and services them internally or forwards them on, and behaves as a User Agent, i.e., it terminates and independently generates SIP transactions. S-CSCF 116 is responsible for interaction with services platforms for the support of services on behalf of an originating endpoint.
HSS 112 holds the subscriber profile and keeps track of the core network node that is currently holding the subscriber. HSS 112 provides mobility management, call and/or session establishment support, and supports the call and/or session establishment procedures in IMS. HSS 112 supports user security information generation, authentication procedures, user identification handling, access authorization, service authorization support service provisioning support, and provides support for application services. HSS 112 may also communicate with an application server (not shown) to offer value added services. The application server and can reside either in the user's home network or in a third party location and enables different services in the IMS network, such as call-forwarding, call waiting, presence and instant messaging. The application server communicates with the HSS using the DIAMETER protocol.
The P-CSCF, I-CSCF, S-CSCF, and HSS functions are all defined in the 3GPP specifications. However, the 3GPP specifications do not map these components to hardware. Moreover, the 3GPP specifications suggest an implementation, such as that illustrated in
One problem associated with an implementation, such as that illustrated in
Another problem with IMS networks is that IMS network elements, such as CSCFs, may be required to support multiple protocols to communicate with IMS and other network elements.
Accordingly, in light of these difficulties associated with IMS networks, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer program products for clustering and communicating between IMS entities and for supporting database access in an IMS environment.
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a system for clustering and communicating between Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) entities. This system includes an interrogating call state control function (I-CSCF) module adapted to receive a communications-session-related message containing a network subscriber identity. The system further includes a serving call state control function (S-CSCF) module adapted to retrieve network subscriber information corresponding to the network subscriber identity and process communication-session-related messages based on the retrieved network subscriber information. A shared local area communications medium interconnects the I-CSCF module and the S-CSCF module and allows the modules to communicate with each other. The communication session related message may be forwarded by the I-CSCF module to the S-CSCF module over the local area communications medium.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein includes an Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) cluster node. The IMS cluster node includes a serving call state control function (S-CSCF) module for controlling media sessions between IMS users. The cluster node further includes a home subscriber service (HSS) module for storing and providing IMS subscription information to the S-CSCF module. The cluster node further includes a shared memory operatively associated with the S-CSCF module and the HSS module. The S-CSCF module obtains IMS subscription information from the HSS function via the shared memory.
According to yet another aspect, the subject matter described herein includes an Internet protocol (IP) multimedia subsystem (IMS) cluster node. The IMS cluster node includes a first IMS module for implementing at least one aspect of establishing and controlling media sessions between IMS users. The cluster node further includes a second IMS module for implementing another aspect for setting up and controlling media sessions between IMS users. The first and second IMS modules may communicate with each other to establish and control IMS sessions. The first and second IMS modules may be implemented in the same cluster. As used herein, the term “cluster” refers to a grouping of functions where individual functions in the group are connected to each other and communicate via a local area communications medium, such as a bus or a local area network.
The subject matter described herein for implementing and communicating between IMS entities may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. As such, the terms “function” or “module” as used herein refer to hardware, software, and/or firmware for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer program product comprising computer executable instructions embodied in a computer readable medium. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, application specific integrated circuits, and downloadable electrical signals. In addition, a computer program product that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
In order to avoid the inefficiencies associated with transmitting messages between IMS entities, such as I-CSCF, a P-CSCF, an S-CSCF, and a HSS, the subject matter described herein includes an IMS cluster node whereby two or more of these IMS functions are implemented on a common platform connected via a shared local area communications medium, such as a bus or local area network (LAN). In one exemplary implementation, two or more of the entities may be implemented on a single card and communicate using shared memory.
I-CSCF module 202 may include a network interface (NI) module 208, an I-CSCF processor 210, and a subscription locator function (SLF) module 212. NI module 208 may be adapted to communicate with nodes external to IMS cluster node 200 that are located in circuit switched or packet switched networks. NI module 208 may provide a physical interface to support communication with external networks, message error checking to ensure that received messages are complete, and buffering received messages for processing by I-CSCF processor 210.
I-CSCF processor 210 may be adapted to receive buffered messages and process session initiation protocol (SIP) messages. If the SIP message is a communication-session-related registration message, such as a SIP REGISTER message, I-CSCF processor 210 may forward the message to SLF module 212. SLF module 212 may identify a home subscriber server (HSS) module 216 that contains a subscriber's location and subscription information. Services or information provided by HSS module 216 may include Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), subscriber IP network mobility management information, subscriber IP network profile information, Equipment Identity Register (EIR) authorization, GSM/IS41 cellular mobility management information, GSM/IS41 subscriber profile information, GSM/IS41 authentication, presence information, etc. SLF module 212 may map an IMS subscriber identification number or ranges of IMS subscriber identification numbers to an IP address associated with an HSS module 216. Non-registration messages may be forwarded by I-CSCF processor 210 to the appropriate S-CSCF module 204 based on mapping information stored by SLF module 212.
S-CSCF module 204 may include a S-CSCF processor 214, HSS entity 216, and a shared data store or memory 218. S-CSCF processor 214 may receive session-related messages from I-CSCF module 210. For example, registration messages may be received by S-CSCF processor 214. S-CSCF processor 214 may query HSS entity 216 to determine connection parameters and/or subscriber options for an end user identified in the registration message. In a conventional network implementation, the connection parameters and subscriber options may include a substantial amount of information. Thus, transferring the information from HSS entity 216 to S-CSCF processor 214 may require substantial network resources, such as bandwidth. In accordance with one embodiment, shared data store or memory 218 containing subscriber information may be associated with HSS entity 216 and may be accessible by S-CSCF processor 214. Thus, in response to a query by S-CSCF processor 214, HSS entity 216 may provide a pointer to a memory location in shared data store 218, thereby permitting subscriber information to be directly accessed by S-CSCF processor 214. By providing S-CSCF processor 214 with direct access to shared data store 218, S-CSCF processor 214 can more efficiently obtain subscriber information without HSS entity 216 becoming a potential communication bottleneck.
Although the example illustrated in
In some configurations, subscriber location and subscription information may be stored in an HSS entity that is external to an IMS cluster node. For example, a network operator with an infrastructure including one or more HLRs may wish to upgrade the HLRs to provide HSS functionality, rather than replacing the HLRs with an IMS cluster node that includes HSS functionality. In such an implementation, the IMS cluster node may include the I-CSCF and S-CSCF functions as well as additional functions that communicate with external HSS nodes. In one implementation, the IMS cluster node may include an abstracted profile server (APS) for communicating with external database nodes, such as HLR nodes, and caching IMS subscription information in memory local to the IMS cluster node for subsequent access.
As in the previous configuration, SLF module 212 may receive session-related messages, such as a SIP REGISTER message, and identify an external HSS entity 402 that contains a subscriber's location and subscription information. SLF module 212 forwards the message to S-CSCF module 404 that interfaces with HSS entity 402. S-CSCF processor 214 forwards the message to abstracted profile server (APS) module 406. APS module 406 retrieves the subscriber's location and subscription information from external HSS entity 402, and stores the retrieved information in shared data store 218 for later access by S-CSCF processor 214. APS module 406 sends the location of the subscriber's information to S-CSCF processor 214, thereby allowing S-CSCF processor 214 to directly access the stored information.
The APS function is described in detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/637,426 filed Dec. 17, 2004, and in a commonly-assigned, U.S. patent application entitled Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Supporting Database Access in an Internet Protocol Subsystem (IMS) Network Environment (Ser. No. 11/305,851 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,916,685)), filed on Dec. 16, 2005. In summary, the APS function communicates with external database nodes, such as HSS and HLR nodes to obtain IMS subscription information. The APS function may communicate with the external database nodes using a language or protocol that is native to each of the nodes. The APS function may communicate with internal modules, such as S-CSCF processor 214 using an abstract language. The APS function will be described in further detail below.
As noted above, SLF module 212 may be adapted to identify an IMS cluster node 100 or 200 that contains a subscriber's location and subscription information. Accordingly, SLF module 212 may map an IMS subscriber identifier or range of IMS subscriber identifiers to an IP address associated with an IMS cluster node 200 or 400.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein may include a method for providing IMS service using a plurality of IMS cluster nodes. In one implementation, a plurality of IMS cluster nodes may be provided or deployed in the network. Each IMS cluster node may be configured to serve a predetermined set of subscribers. In one implementation, a P-CSCF may forward an IMS related message, such as registration message, to IMS cluster node, and the IMS cluster node may either process the message or forward the message to another IMS cluster node until the correct IMS cluster node is located. In an alternate implementation, a cluster node location function may be provided in the network for locating the correct IMS cluster node among a plurality of IMS cluster nodes.
In the message flow illustrated in
In a slight variation to the example illustrated in
As discussed above, in an alternate implementation, a cluster node location function (CLF) may be provided to locate the appropriate IMS cluster nodes among a plurality of IMS cluster nodes for processing a message.
In Table 1, the left hand column includes subscriber identifiers. The right hand column includes corresponding cluster node IP addresses. In the illustrated example, it is assumed that each of the IP addresses corresponds to one of the cluster nodes illustrated in
In an alternate implementation, cluster location database 603 may be divided into two databases or tables. The first database or table may include entries that are indexed by individual mobile subscriber identifiers. The second database or table may include entries that indexed by ranges of mobile subscriber identifiers. The individual mobile subscriber identifiers in the first database may be inside or outside of the ranges in the second database. In such an implementation, a lookup may first be performed in the portion or database that includes individual mobile subscriber identifiers. If the lookup results in a match, then the registration message may be forwarded to the appropriate IMS cluster node. If the lookup does not result in a match, a lookup may be performed in the range based database or table to locate a matching entry.
As illustrated in
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, an IMS cluster node is adapted to provide enhanced security for elements of the cluster, such as an HSS element. The advantages of this enhanced IMS cluster security may be easily seen when compared with prior IMS network architectures. For example, in the case of an IMS network that includes a stand-alone HSS element, the HSS element must advertise it's IP network address and port information to other elements in the network (e.g., IP routers, etc.), so that other nodes in the network (e.g., I-CSCF, S-CSCF, application servers, etc.) will know how to reach the HSS. By advertising its reachability information to other nodes in the network, the HSS becomes more vulnerable to malicious attacks, such as denial of service attacks and hacking attacks.
The IMS cluster architecture described above affords significant additional protection to those IMS elements/functions that are incorporated within the node. For example, an HSS element that is incorporated within an IMS cluster may be effectively “hidden” from other nodes in the IMS network. As such, the HSS element is not required to advertise its IP network address and port information to other elements in the network. Instead, reachability information associated with the IMS cluster HSS element need only be known or communicated to “trusted” i-CSCF or S-CSCF elements that are associated with the IMS cluster. As such, the IMS cluster HSS element is significantly less vulnerable to malicious attacks, including denial of service and hacking type attacks.
In one embodiment, an I-CSCF element associated with an IMS cluster node may implement a network address translation (NAT) function on behalf of other elements in the IMS cluster, such as an HSS element. For example, using an NAT may be provided in front of HSS cluster node 200 or 400 or any other of the IMS cluster node examples described herein so that the addresses of internal cluster node elements are hidden from external elements, while still allowing the external elements to communicate with the internal cluster node elements. In such an architecture, the NAT may advertise a translated IP address for each internal IMS cluster node element to external nodes desiring to communicate with an internal cluster node element. When the NAT receives a packet for the internal cluster node element, the NAT may translate the destination IP address in the packet from the advertised address to the hidden internal address for the internal cluster node element.
To facilitate an understanding of exemplary embodiments, many aspects are described in terms of sequences of actions that can be performed by elements of a computer system. For example, it will be recognized that in each of the embodiments, the various actions can be performed by specialized circuits or circuitry (e.g., discrete logic gates interconnected to perform a specialized function), by program instructions being executed by one or more processors, or by a combination of both.
Moreover, the sequences of actions can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor containing system, or other system that can fetch the instructions from a computer-readable medium and execute the instructions.
As used herein, a “computer-readable medium” can be any means that can contain or store the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The computer-readable medium can be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable medium can include the following: a portable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM).
Thus, the subject matter described herein can be embodied in many different forms, and all such forms are contemplated to be within the scope of what is claimed. Any such form of embodiment can be referred to herein as “logic configured to” perform a described action, or alternatively as “logic that” performs a described action.
One aspect of the present invention relates to a novel implementation of IMS functions in a network. More particularly, the use of an abstracted profile server (APS) is disclosed.
In previously contemplated IMS core network architecture models a serving CSCF (S-CSCF) entity is adapted to communicate with an HSS entity using a protocol such as DIAMETER to obtain subscriber profile and IM mobility management information associated with an IMS subscriber. The S-CSCF entity may also be required to communicate with an Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) server using a protocol such as RADIUS, or with an ENUM database server using DNS protocol. In order to provide support for legacy networks, the S-CSCF entity may also need to access/communicate with other mobile subscriber databases, such as a GSM or IS-41 home location register (HLR), an Equipment Identity Register (EIR), or an Authentication Center (AuC) using protocols including, but not limited to, Signaling System 7 (SS7) Signaling Connection Control Part (SCCP), SCCP User Part Adaptation Layer (SUA), Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP), Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and Mobile Application Part (MAP). See
The simultaneous support of such numerous native Cx interface protocols by a CSCF entity is not practical from a network operation standpoint due to the complex (and potentially dynamic) nature of the associated multi-protocol control logic. With regard to the dynamic nature of the control logic, it will be appreciated that it in certain signaling scenarios it may be necessary to query several network entities (e.g., HSS, HLR, AAA, EIR, AuC, Presence Server, etc.) in a particular sequence, where the sequence is based, at least in part, on the responses obtained from the various network entities. For example, for a single communication transaction, an AAA server may be queried using RADIUS protocol and based on the response returned by the AAA server, it may be determined that an HSS entity should be queried using DIAMETER protocol. Based on the response provided by the HSS, it may then be determined that a GSM HLR should be queried using MAP protocol.
A network entity/function that is referred to herein as an abstracted profile server (APS) is disclosed. As illustrated in
According to yet another embodiment, multiple CSCF entities may use a single APS function (see
In other embodiments, illustrated in
Also connected to the internal communication bus/network are processor modules that are adapted to provide Interrogating-CSCF functionality. In one embodiment, an I-CSCF module that includes a Subscription Locator Function (SLF) is adapted to receive a communication session-related registration message (e.g., SIP REGISTER). The SLF function is adapted to identify the HSS entity that contains a subscriber's location and subscription information. Services or information provided by an HSS entity may include, but are not limited to, Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA), subscriber IP network mobility management information, subscriber IP network profile information, Equipment Identity Register (EIR) authorization, GSM/IS-41 cellular mobility management information, GSM/IS41 subscriber profile information, GSM/IS41 authentication, Presence information, etc. In one embodiment of the present invention, HSS functionality is included within the IMS cluster node as an HSS processor or module that is connected to the internal communication bus/network. Once a subscriber's HSS processor is identified, the subscriber's HSS processor may be queried to determine the identity of a Serving-CSCF entity (S-CSCF), to which a communication session-related registration message is then forwarded. In one embodiment of the present invention, S-CSCF functionality is included within the IMS cluster node as an S-CSCF processor or module that is connected to the internal communication bus/network.
With regard to querying of the HSS, it will be appreciated that in one embodiment, the HSS query could be initiated by the sending of an appropriate AP protocol query message from the I-CSCF processor to the APS function or processor. The APS function may alternatively be incorporated into the CSCF module or processor. The APS function is adapted to receive the AP protocol query message, formulate a related DIAMETER query message, and forward the DIAMETER query message to the appropriate HSS entity in the network (see
It will be understood that various details of the invention may be changed without departing from the scope of the invention. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/303,757, filed Dec. 16, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,015,293 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/637,337 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/637,426, both filed Dec. 17, 2004; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1872857 | Wesson et al. | Apr 1931 | A |
5535373 | Olnowich | Jul 1996 | A |
5765172 | Fox | Jun 1998 | A |
6298383 | Gutman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6522641 | Siu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6785730 | Taylor | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6816469 | Kung et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6873849 | de la Red et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7027582 | Khello et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7171460 | Kalavade et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7254603 | Weber et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292592 | Rune | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304986 | Allen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7380022 | Tell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7551926 | Rune | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7916685 | Schaedler et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8015293 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8149725 | Lipps et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8547908 | Marsico | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8615237 | Baniel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020131395 | Wang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194378 | Foti | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196775 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005350 | Koning et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040280 | Koskelainen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030131151 | Roach et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133558 | Kung et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149774 | McConnell et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030233461 | Mariblanca-Nieves et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040103157 | Requena et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040152469 | Yla-Outinen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203763 | Tammi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205212 | Huotari et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223489 | Rotsten et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225878 | Costa-Requena et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234060 | Tammi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242227 | Huotari et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246965 | Westman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007984 | Shaheen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009520 | Herrero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050058125 | Mutikainen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078642 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083904 | Khartabil et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094594 | Roh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120198 | Bajko et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124341 | Myllymaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136926 | Tammi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141511 | Gopal | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155036 | Tiainen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159156 | Bajko et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050235000 | Keil | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249196 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271055 | Stupka | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030320 | Tammi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030321 | Choi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045249 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068816 | Pelaez et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077926 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078119 | Jee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090001 | Collins | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121913 | Lin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172730 | Matsuda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211423 | Ejzak et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221972 | Bhargava et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230263 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259759 | Maino et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274744 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032194 | Griffin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036312 | Cai et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100981 | Adamczyk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121596 | Kurapati et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153771 | Doradla et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174400 | Cai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189215 | Wu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070242637 | Dynarski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297419 | Asherup et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005300 | Grayson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014961 | Lipps et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025221 | Lipps et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039104 | Gu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090080440 | Balyan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090129271 | Ramankutty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090196231 | Giaretta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196290 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221310 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232011 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264097 | Cai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265467 | Peles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305684 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313379 | Rydnell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100070581 | Hewes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100268802 | Lipps et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290392 | Rasanen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291923 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311392 | Stenfelt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331023 | Cai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110116378 | Ramankutty et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116382 | McCann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165901 | Baniel et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110199906 | Kanode et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200053 | Kanode et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202612 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202614 | Graig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202676 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225113 | Mann | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225280 | Delsesto et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225306 | Delsesto et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110302244 | McCann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314178 | Kanode et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120096177 | Rasanen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124220 | Zhou et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155389 | McNamee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155470 | McNamee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120202550 | Marsico | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224524 | Marsico | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120224531 | Karuturi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225679 | McCann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226758 | Sprague et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226814 | Stucker | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239771 | Rasanen | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120311064 | Deo | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 357 720 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2 242 205 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2 220 841 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1 847 076 | Feb 2012 | EP |
1 846 832 | Apr 2012 | EP |
WO 2006066145 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006066149 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2008008226 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008016607 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2010139360 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011082090 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011156274 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012106710 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118959 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118963 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118967 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012119147 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012154674 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,914 (Nov. 6, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/036784 (Nov. 1, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/415,352 (Oct. 26, 2012). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10841605.8 (Oct. 17, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for the International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027281 (Jun. 15, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2012/027263 (Jun. 14, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027736 (Jun. 12, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/023971 (Jun. 11, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027269 (Jun. 11, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,746 (May 10, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,552 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Caching Call Session Control Function (CSCF) Data at a Diameter Signaling Router (DSR),” (Unpublished, filed May 7, 2012). |
PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/036784, Titled, “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Steering a Subscriber Between Access Networks,” (Unpublished, Filed May 7, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2011/039285 (Feb. 9, 2012). |
Notification of the Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/061934 (Oct. 25, 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Evolved Packet System (EPS); Mobility Managment Entity (MME) and Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) related interfaces based on Diameter protocol (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 29.272, V10.2.0, pp. 1-95 (Mar. 2011). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and Charging Control Architecture (Release 11),” 3GPP TS 23.203 V11.0.1, pp. 1-37 (Jan. 2011). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Sh Interface based on the Diameter protocol; Protocol details (Release 8),” 3GPP TS 29.329, V8.8.0 (Dec. 2010). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.228 version 9.4.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 123 228, V9.4.0 (Oct. 2010). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; End-to-end Quality of Service (QoS) concept and architecture (3GPP TS 23.207 version 9.0.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 123 207, V9.0.0 (Oct. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Packet Switched (PS) domain charging (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.251, V9.4.0 (Oct. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.299, V9.4.0 (Jun. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Charging architecture and principles (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.240, V9.1.0 (Jun. 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE + ePC =EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” EFORT, pp. 1-229 (Part 1 of 2) (May 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE + ePC =EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” EFORT pp. 230-461 (Part 2 of 2) (May 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control signalling flows and Quality of Service (QoS) parameter mapping (Release 9),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, TS 29.213 V9.2.0, pp. 1-129 (Mar. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0 (Mar. 2010). |
Hakala et al., “Diameter Credit-Control Application,” RFC 4006, pp. 1-114 (Aug. 2005). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Network Access Server Application,” RFC 4005, pp. 1-85 (Aug. 2005). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Mobile IPv4 Application,” RFC 4004, pp. 1-53 (Aug. 2005). |
“IMS Security Framework,” 3GPP2 S.R0086-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-39 (Dec. 11, 2003). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem—Accounting Information Flows and Protocol,” 3GPP2 X.S0013-008-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-42 (Dec. 2003). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem—Charging Architecture,” 3GPP2 X.S0013-007-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-16 (Dec. 2003). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 3588, pp. 1-147 (Sep. 2003). |
Olson et al., “Support for IPv6 in Session Description Protocol (SDP),” RFC 3266, pp. 1-5 (Jun. 2002). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Dec. 13, 2011). |
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Dec. 9, 2011). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European application No. 05854503.9 (Jul. 18, 2011). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Application No. 05854512.0 (Mar. 15, 2012). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(i) EPC for European Application No. 05854503.9 (Jan. 19, 2012). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European application No. 05854512.0 (Nov. 11, 2011). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Jun. 28, 2011). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (May 11, 2011). |
Notice of Abandonment for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (May 4, 2011). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Apr. 12, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Jan. 5, 2011). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,851 (Jan. 3, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (Dec. 22, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,851 (Nov. 18, 2010). |
Chinese Official Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780036126.2 (Oct. 25, 2010). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Oct. 19, 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05 854 503.9 (Oct. 13, 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05 854 512.0 (Oct. 12, 2010). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Sep. 17, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,851 (Aug. 12, 2010). |
Official Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780033839.3 (Jul. 15, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Jul. 8, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Apr. 14, 2010). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Mar. 23, 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05854512.0 (Feb. 8, 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05854503.9 (Feb. 8, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,851 (Jan. 27, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (Dec. 9, 2009). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 05854503.9 (Nov. 17, 2009). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 05854512.0 (Nov. 17, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Oct. 16, 2009). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Sep. 25, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Sep. 11, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/305,851 (Aug. 14, 2009). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Jun. 25, 2009). |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 11/605,947 (Jun. 1, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (May 28, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/584,247 (Mar. 13, 2009). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (Oct. 6, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (May 7, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US05/45813 (Mar. 24, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (Feb. 21, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US07/17116 (Feb. 15, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US07/15290 (Feb. 15, 2008). |
Restriction Requirment for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (Oct. 4, 2007). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US05/45802 (Sep. 15, 2006). |
Linux-HA Architecture (Release 2), BasicArchitecture: Linux HA, http://www.linux-ha.org/BasicArchitecture, pp. 1-7 (Jun. 8, 2006). |
“Tekelec Announces TekCore IMS Core Platform,” (Jun. 5, 2006). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP—Multimedia—Subsystem (Downloaded from the Internet on May 22, 2006). |
“Operator Guidebook to IMS and New Generation Networks and Services,” www.morianagroup.com, Second Edition (Feb. 2006). |
“Operator Guidebook to IMS and New Generation Networks and Services,” www.morianagroup.com, First Edition (Aug. 2005). |
Gonzalo et al., “The 3G IP Multimedia Subsystem,” Chapter 3: General Principles of the IMS Architecture (Aug. 20, 2004). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem IMS Over and Applications,” 3G Americas, pp. 1-17 (Jul. 2004). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network; IP Multimedia (IM) Session Handling; IM Call Model; Stage 2 (Release 6),” 3GPP TS 23.218, v6.1.0, pp. 1-56 (Mar. 2004). |
“All-IP Core Network Multimedia Domain,” 3rd Generation Partnerships Project 2 (3GPP2), 3GPP2 X.S0013-000-0, Version 1.0, pp. i-ii and 1-14 (Dec. 2003). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network; Cx and Dx Interfaces Based on the Diameter Protocol; Protocol Details (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 29.229, V5.6.0, pp. 1-23 (Dec. 2003). |
Camarillo, “Compressing the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3486 (Feb. 2003). |
Garcia-Martin et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP) Static Dictionary for Signaling Compression (SigComp),” Network Working Group, RFC 3485 (Feb. 2003). |
Arkko et al., Security Mechanism Agreement for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), Network Working Group, RFC 3329 (Jan. 2003). |
Price et al., “Signaling Compression (SigComp),” Network Working Group, RFC 3320 (Jan. 2003). |
“Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 2 (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 23.228, V5.7.0, pp. 1-130 (Dec. 2002). |
Rosenberg et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” RFC 3261, pp. 1-252 (Jun. 2002). |
Howard, “Sipping IETF51 3GPP Security and Authentication,” http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/01aug/slides/sipping-7/index.htm (Dowloaded from Internet on Dec. 16, 2005) (Sep. 13, 2001). |
Narten et al., “Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6,” RFC 3041, pp. 1-16 (Jan. 2001). |
Faltstrom, “E.164 Number and DNS,” RFC 2916, pp. 1-10 (Sep. 2000). |
Vaha-Sipila, “URLs for Telephone Calls,” RFC 2806, pp. 1-20 (Apr. 2000). |
Aboba et al., “The Network Access Identifier,” RFC 2486, pp. 1-8 (Jan. 1999). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Proxy Server Extensions,” IETF Working Draft, draft-calhoun-diameter-proxy-01.txt (Aug. 1, 1998). |
Berners-Lee et al., “Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax,” RFC 2396, pp. 1-38 (Aug. 1998). |
Tekelec, “Eagle® Feature Guide,” P/N 910-1225-01 (Jan. 1998). |
Jalava, “Service Routing in 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem,” Nokia, pp. 1-16 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (Mar. 26, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 11792956.2 (Mar. 13, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (Feb. 15, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (Jan. 7, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (Dec. 13, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/712,481 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Encrypting Diameter Identification Information in a Communication Network,” (Unpublished, filed Dec. 12, 2012). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,”draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-07, Section 6.3, p. 68 (Jul. 2001). |
Declaration of Mark Kanode for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (Nov. 1, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (Oct. 23, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (Sep. 19, 2013). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (Sep. 13, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/974,869 (Aug. 19, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (Jul. 1, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (Jun. 7, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,352 (May 28, 2013). |
Rouse, “Platform,” http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/definition/platform, pp. 1-2 (2006-2009). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (Apr. 25, 2014). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (Apr. 24, 2014). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (Mar. 21, 2014). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,071 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Clustering and Communicating Between Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Entities and for Supporting Database Access in an IMS Network Environment,” (Unpublished, filed Feb. 25, 2014). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (Feb. 10, 2014). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 10841605.8 (Feb. 3, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (Jan. 14, 2014). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (Dec. 30, 2013). |
Notification of Publication and Entry into Examination Procedure for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280013938.6 (Dec. 18, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751986.6 (Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751783.7 (Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751812.4 (Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12741984.4 (Nov. 13, 2013). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 23.203, V9.3.0 (Dec. 2009). |
“Cisco Content Services Gateway—2nd Generation Release 3.5 Installation and Configuration Guide,” Chapter 10: Configuring Gx Support, pp. 10-1-10-10, Chapter 11: Configuring Mobile PCC Support, pp. 11-1-11-8, URL: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/csg2/3.5/installation/guide/csg3-51.pdf (Jun. 5, 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110282904 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60637337 | Dec 2004 | US | |
60637426 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11303757 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 13192410 | US |