The subject matter described herein relates to interfacing a media gateway to a network. More particularly the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer program products for implementing link redundancy in a media gateway.
A media gateway is a device that sends and receives voice packets over a packet network and that may also interface with a circuit-switched network. On the packet side, a media gateway may send and receive voice packets over an IP network. Each connection or path between media gateways over which IP-encapsulated voice packets travel is referred to as a link, which is analogous to a channel in a circuit-switched network.
In order to provide high reliability, link redundancy is important with media gateways. One popular link redundancy design is 1:1 link redundancy where an active link, also referred to as a protected link, carries voice traffic, while a standby mate link, referred to as a protecting link, operates in a hot standby mode to take over if the active link fails. In order to achieve such redundancy, the pair of active and standby links needs to appear to the IP network as if they are in a single LAN segment. Thus, active and standby links are required to be bridged into a single LAN segment in order to achieve hot standby protection.
One existing approach to providing link redundancy is to use external Ethernet switches to switch traffic from an active link to a standby link when the active link fails.
In operation, when active link 112 fails, a card switchover occurs within media gateway 100, and Ethernet switch 104 is configured to forward traffic to standby link 114. Similarly, media gateway 100 sends outbound traffic over standby link 114.
One problem with using additional Ethernet switches to provide link redundancy is that this approach introduces additional switches in the path between media gateway 100 and edge routers 106. Adding additional Ethernet switches increases equipment costs and increases the number of potential points of failure in the network. Another problem with this approach is that a card switchover is required. As used herein, the term “card switchover” refers to one card taking over the operations of another card. In a media gateway context, a card switchover may include transitioning all of the connection information regarding which voice servers are associated with which connections from the active card to the standby card.
Another general approach to providing link redundancy is Cisco's Bridged Virtual Interface (BVI) or Switched Virtual Interface (SVI).
Additional problems with the BVI/SVI approach include the fact that bridged links must reside in the same hardware device, bridged links are always treated equally, and there are no hot standby NIC cards. Further problems with the BVI/SVI approach are that configuration is on a per VLAN basis, and thus support of multiple VLANs requires multiple bridges to be configured individually. Further, the BVI/SVI concept is typically applied to IP routers or Ethernet bridges, rather than end devices, such as media gateways. In addition, using a single hardware device to implement a BVI or SVI introduces a single point of failure.
Accordingly, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer program products for implementing link redundancy in a media gateway.
Methods, systems, and computer program products for implementing link redundancy in a media gateway are provided according to one method, a media gateway link protection group is provisioned to associate with a common VLAN a common virtual local area network (VLAN) primary and secondary links associated with at least one line card in a media gateway. The primary and secondary links are connected using a cross connection between ports associated with the at least one line card. At run time, traffic is automatically bridged between the primary and secondary links using the common VLAN and the cross connection.
In one exemplary implementation, an active card in the media gateway is a card that has connection information for voice over IP connections with one or more voice server modules in the media gateway. A standby card may not include connection information for connections with voice server modules in the media gateway. Accordingly, if the active link connected to the active card fails, incoming traffic bridged from the standby card may still reach the voice servers. Outbound traffic may reach the network via the active card, the cross connection, the standby card, and the standby link.
The subject matter described herein for providing link redundancy in a media gateway may achieve any one or more of the following advantages over the BVI/SVI approach:
The subject matter described herein for implementing link redundancy in a media gateway can be implemented using a computer program product comprising computer executable instructions embodied in a computer readable medium. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include chip memory devices, disk memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer program product that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device for computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer program products for providing link redundancy in a media gateway.
In operation, media gateway 300 may receive instructions from a media gateway controller (not shown) to establish a voice link with a remote endpoint. The voice link may terminate at one of voice servers 306. The voice link may be forwarded through line card 302 or 304 to the remote endpoint. The voice link is typically bidirectional, as is common with most voice telephone calls. Accordingly, incoming voice traffic from the remote endpoint may be received through line card 302 or 304 and forwarded to the appropriate voice server 306 for processing. As stated above, in one implementation, the active line card maintains connection information regarding which voice server is associated with a particular connection and the standby line card does not maintain such information. Accordingly, when the active link to the remote endpoint fails, as will described in more detail below, traffic between the remote endpoint and media gateway 300 may proceed using the standby link, a standby line card, and the cross connect.
It should be noted that media gateway 300 may be connected to IP network 309 without the use of additional Ethernet switches to provide bridging, as illustrated in
In the illustrated example, media gateway 300 includes an active line card 302 connected to an active link 314 and standby line card 304 connected to standby link 316. Active card 302 and standby card 304 each include a plurality of IP ports, numbered 1-4, connected to the external network. In addition, each line card includes internal ports 318A and 318B connecting each line card to a forwarding engine and through a switching fabric (not shown) to voice servers 306.
In order to implement link redundancy, active link 314 and standby link 316 may be bridged using active line card 302 and standby line card 304. In one implementation, VLANs may be used to perform the bridging. For example, in
Although in the example illustrated in
If a failure occurs between media gateway 300 and edge router 310 or edge router 312, the failure can be detected since links are connected between the media gateway and edge routers. Link failures are typically bidirectional, since, for electrical transmissions, bidirectional communications flow over the same cable. In optical communications, such as SONET communications, a failure may be unidirectional, since separate cables are provided for incoming and outbound communications. If a bidirectional failure occurs on active link 314, edge router 310 will notify the network that a particular destination (i.e., a voice server) is not reachable. Edge router 310 may notify the network using standard routing protocols, such as RIP or OSPF. The network will then begin routing traffic destined for the particular destination to edge router 312. Incoming traffic for the destination will proceed from edge router 312 over standby link 316 to standby line card 304. Since the traffic is associated with VLAN1, standby line card 304 will forward the traffic over cross connect 320 to active line card 302. Active line card 302 will then forward the traffic to the appropriate voice server. Outbound traffic arriving at line card 302 from a voice server 306 will be forwarded over cross connect 320 to standby line card 304. Standby line card 304 will then forward the traffic to the network over standby link 316.
If a failure is detected in one direction, for example on the inbound side of active link 314, the network will route inbound traffic to standby link 316 and standby line card 304. Standby line card 304 will then forward the inbound traffic to active line card 302 using VLAN1. Outbound traffic arriving at active card 302 will be forwarded over the outbound side of active link 314 using VLAN1. Thus, a card switchover is not required.
If a unidirectional failure occurs on the outbound side of active link 314, inbound traffic from the network 309 will continue to use the inbound side of active link 314. Active line card 302 will forward the inbound traffic to the appropriate voice server. Outbound traffic arriving at line card 302 will be forwarded to line card 304 using VLAN1 and cross connect 320. Line card 304 will then forward the traffic to the network. Again, bridging occurs automatically through normal VLAN operation and cross connect 320 without requiring card switchover.
In the illustrated example, IP ports 1 and 2 on each card form a protection group. Similarly, IP ports 3 and 4 on each card also form a protection group. With this internal port bridging solution, a media gateway can achieve individual link protection by avoiding switching over between cards. Only when two links of the same protection group are down at the same time is a switchover between cards required. When a card switchover occurs, the standby and now new active Ethernet line card sends gratuitous ARP requests to refresh router ARP entries, so that incoming traffic will be directed to the standby link which has now become active. If an administrative switchover between Ethernet line cards occurs, the entire line card function is switched between line cards. However, the internal port bridging solution described herein will remain functioning by bridging any traffic from the current active Ethernet line card to the former active Ethernet line card. If the cross link between two line cards fails, the link on the standby card may be taken out of service to ensure that incoming traffic will completely follow the active path.
Returning to
Returning to
If active link 314 fails, outbound traffic from voice servers 306 that would have entered the network via active card 302 will reach the network through standby card 304 using the automatic bridging mechanism described in the preceding paragraph. Similarly, inbound traffic that would have reached active card 302 vial active link 314 will reach active card 302 via standby link 316, standby card 304, and cross connect 320 using automatic bridging as described in the preceding paragraph. Thus, the subject matter described herein uses automatic bridging between line cards to achieve link redundancy in a media gateway and does not require card switchover to achieve the redundancy.
In one exemplary implementation, the operation of the subject matter described herein can be divided into events that occur at provisioning time and at run time. At provisioning time, protection groups are provisioned in order to provide link redundancy. Provisioning commands may be issued by an operator through a management interface, such as EMS 510. The provisioning commands may include creation, modification, and deletion of link protection groups, which may include two links. Each link may be identified by full link ID. In one implementation, a link ID may include a node ID, an interface ID, and a link ID. A protection group may be provisioned as a reverted or a non-reverting group.
The provisioning command may be received by control module 508 at media gateway 300. Control module 508 may check the validity of the received command and update a database on media gateway 300 with the provision protection group. Control module 508 may pass the command to packet interface module 512, which passes the command to bridging module 502 to implement the actual bridging.
At runtime, card switchover may be triggered by an event, such as a double link failure. Monitoring module 500 may detect the failure event. While traffic bridging may occur automatically as described above, a set of actions may be required to be performed at the interface card or at control module 508 when a single link failure occurs. The actions may be taken by facility manager 506. The actions may include determining whether a card level switchover needs to occur (in the case of a double failure) and whether gratuitous ARP messages are required to be sent. Link failure may be reported to facility manager 506 and then to control module 508. Control module 508 may report the failure to element management system 510.
Returning to
In block 604, an upper management module is notified of the switchover event. Referring to
As stated above, a protection group may be provisioned as a revertive or non-revertive group. A non-revertive group does not switch a card from active mode to standby mode and back to active mode. A revertive group switches cards between standby and active modes if an active link that was down recovers.
In block 704, if the protection group is operating in revertive mode, control proceeds to block 708 where traffic is switched to protection link in the protection group. The protection link is the former active link. In block 710, upper management is notified of the module switchover event.
It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/765,066, filed Feb. 3, 2006; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5818842 | Burwell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5938732 | Lim et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6052733 | Mahalingam et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061348 | Castrigno et al. | May 2000 | A |
6111880 | Rusu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6229538 | McIntyre et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272113 | McIntyre et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308282 | Huang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6363497 | Chrabaszcz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381218 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6512774 | Vepa et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6633563 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6714535 | Herh | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728780 | Hebert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738826 | Moberg et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741585 | Munoz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754745 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763479 | Hebert | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766482 | Yip et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771673 | Baum et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778491 | Fourcand et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6850531 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856591 | Ma et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862564 | Shue et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879667 | Carew et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891836 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895528 | Cantwell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6910148 | Ho et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6928482 | Ben Nun et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938092 | Burns | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975587 | Adamski et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7177943 | Temoshenko et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185094 | Marquette et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212519 | Johnson et | May 2007 | B2 |
7233567 | Li | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7239605 | Dinker et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263060 | Garofalo et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7289487 | Jang | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293080 | Clemm et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7424025 | Qian et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020012352 | Hansson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016926 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020051464 | Sin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020191612 | Curtis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030118039 | Nishi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142795 | Gavette et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172319 | Ryhorchuk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174729 | Heink et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040008722 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030757 | Pandya | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066782 | Nassar | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071142 | Moriwaki et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040131064 | Burwell et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050053073 | Kloth et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050185577 | Sakamoto et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050243716 | Bitar et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281190 | McGee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060143309 | McGee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060268686 | Shei et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070083528 | Matthews et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080317055 | Zetterlund et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090092044 | Saito | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 668 471 | Apr 2005 | EP |
WO 2005033889 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006128005 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070183314 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60765066 | Feb 2006 | US |