The subject matter described herein relates to providing prepaid network services. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer program products for performing prepaid account balance screening.
With the increasing popularity of prepaid network services, such as prepaid mobile plans, in which a user of a mobile phone purchases a number of cell-phone minutes in advance, the network infrastructure required to support prepaid services must be enhanced to handle the increased traffic and processing requirements.
For example, MSC 100 may send an initial detection point (IDP) query to STP 104 (
As the number of prepaid subscribers increases, the number of SCPs in the bank of PPSCPs 102 may increase, with a corresponding increase in the number of connections to the bank of PPSCPs 102. An increase in SCPs and connections required may drive up the costs of the system, not only in physical hardware but also in resources required to administer and maintain the additional nodes. In addition, the increase in traffic due to the increased number of queries to the prepaid database may cause overall network performance to suffer. For example, excessive network traffic caused by prepaid database queries may limit or impair the function of other nodes on the network, such as home location registers (HLRs), E.164 number mapping (ENUM) servers, home subscriber servers (HSSs), and the like.
Thus, there exists a need to minimize the number of PPSCPs required, and/or minimize the number of signaling links connecting the PPSCPs with the network or with each other. There also exists a need to reduce prepaid query traffic and the corresponding effect on network performance. Accordingly, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer program products for performing prepaid account balance screening.
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a method for performing prepaid account balance screening. The method includes receiving, at a network entity for processing network signaling messages, a signaling message containing information that identifies a prepaid subscriber, the message being sent from a message source and intended for a message destination. It is determined whether the prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies a threshold requirement, using prepaid account balance screening data and the information in the signaling message that identifies the prepaid subscriber, where the prepaid account balance screening data is a subset of available prepaid subscriber account information stored in a prepaid subscriber database separate from the prepaid account balance screening data. In response to determining that the prepaid subscriber's account balance does not satisfy the threshold requirement, a screening action is performed. In one example, the screening action shields the prepaid subscriber database from signaling message traffic associated with the prepaid subscriber's account.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a system for performing prepaid account balance screening. The system includes a prepaid subscriber account balance screening database, containing prepaid account balance screening data representing a subset of available prepaid subscriber account information stored in a prepaid subscriber database separate from the prepaid account balance screening data. The system also includes a network entity for routing and processing network signaling messages, where the network entity is adapted to receive a signaling message containing information that identifies a prepaid subscriber, the message being sent from a message source and intended for a message destination, and to use the information in the signaling message that identifies the prepaid subscriber to extract information from the prepaid subscriber account balance screening database to determine whether the prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies a threshold requirement, and in response to determining that the prepaid subscriber's account balance does not satisfy the threshold requirement, perform a screening action. In one example, the screening action shields the prepaid subscriber database from signaling message traffic associated with the prepaid subscriber's account.
The subject matter described herein for methods, systems, and computer program products for performing prepaid account balance screening may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. As such, the terms “function” or “module” as used herein refer to hardware, software, and/or firmware for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer program product comprising computer executable instructions embodied in a computer readable medium. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, application specific integrated circuits, and downloadable electrical signals. In addition, a computer program product that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
In accordance with the subject matter disclosed herein, methods, systems, and computer program products for performing prepaid account balance screening are provided. In one implementation, a message routing entity maintains a local database containing information that indicates whether or not a prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies a threshold requirement. Upon determination that the account balance does not satisfy the threshold requirement, the routing entity may respond on behalf of a prepaid SCP, thus obviating the need for query/response messages to and from the prepaid SCP, resulting in a reduction of network traffic. For example, the message routing entity may check to see if the subscriber has a positive account balance, and if not (i.e., the subscriber's account balance is zero or negative) the message routing entity may respond with a “call not allowed” message on behalf of the prepaid SCP.
In one embodiment, a prepaid account balance screening database 202 is used for storing prepaid account balance screening data, i.e., information from which it can be determined whether a prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies a threshold requirement. Prepaid account balance screening database 202 may be a component within NE 200, such as a database program running on a server or processor card within the telecommunication frame NE 200, or it may be a database external to NE 200 and associated with NE 200, such as a database located on a database server that is connected to NE 200 via a local bus or LAN. Prepaid account balance screening database 202 may also be available for access by other network entities, as well. It is understood that the prepaid account balance screening data may be stored and/or maintained in means other than a database, such as in a table, in a data structure in memory, and the like.
The system may contain a network entity adapted to provide a prepaid accounting service, such as a prepaid service control point (PPSCP 204), or a prepaid application service, such as an IMS or SIP application server, which receives queries to a prepaid subscriber database (PPDB 206). In one implementation, PPDB 206 may be a master database for storing information about prepaid subscriber accounts maintained by the network provider. Prepaid account balance screening database 202 is separate from PPDB 206 and may contain a subset of the data stored in PPDB 206.
The purpose of prepaid account balance screening database 202 is to allow a determination whether a prepaid subscriber's account balance meets a threshold requirement before allowing the subscriber to access the network, without having to make a query to PPDB 206. To perform this determination, it is not necessary to use all of the data typically contained in database PPDB 206; thus, in one embodiment, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may be populated with a subset of the data contained in PPDB 206. Alternatively, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may contain data that is derived from the data or a subset of the data contained in PPDB 206.
In one embodiment, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may store information usable to determine whether a prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies the threshold requirement. For example, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may include only the identities prepaid subscribers whose accounts do not satisfy the threshold requirement, in which case a subscriber is allowed to complete the call only if the subscriber is listed in prepaid account balance screening database 202. In this example, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may function as a “white list”, or list of allowed subscribers. The prepaid account balance screening database 202 need only contain information by which the subscriber or account may be identified, such as the subscriber name, telephone number, uniform resource identifier (URI), IP address, or other identifying information. Alternatively, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may include only those prepaid subscribers whose accounts do satisfy the threshold requirement, in which case a subscriber is allowed to complete the call only if the subscriber is not listed in prepaid account balance screening database 202. In this example, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may function as a “black list”, or list of disallowed subscribers. For implementations in which the subscriber is allowed or denied access based on whether or not the subscriber's name exists in a list, prepaid account balance screening database 202 need not be a fully-featured database, but could be as simple as a table, a list, or even a hash table or associative array. Prepaid account balance screening database 202 may include other information, such as the actual balance available. Alternatively, prepaid account balance screening database 202 may contain information that is nowhere contained in PPDB 206 but is instead derived from data contained in PPDB 206. For example, each subscriber record in PPDB 206 may include the subscriber's name and telephone number, and the subscriber's current prepaid balance; in this scenario, each prepaid account balance screening database 202 record could include a field not found in PPDB 206, such as a Boolean value that is set to either “allow” or “deny”, depending on whether the prepaid subscriber's account balance meets the threshold requirement.
The system may include a back office 208 through which a subscriber may perform subscriber account transactions, such as adding funds to the subscriber's prepaid account, determining the prepaid account balance, and so on. For example, back office 208 may process a payment, such as a credit card payment, from a subscriber; back office 208 may instruct PPSCP 204 to increase that subscriber's account balance, and PPSCP 204 may update that subscriber's account record within PPDB to reflect the new balance. This may trigger an update of prepaid account balance screening database 202 to reflect a change in a subscriber's account status or account balance. The update of prepaid account balance screening database 202 may be performed via a provisioning interface 210 or other means. For example, where the threshold requirement is that the subscriber's account balance must be greater than zero, if the subscriber's balance goes from zero or negative to a value greater than zero, back office 208, PPSCP 204, or some other entity may update prepaid account balance screening database 202 to change that subscriber's status to indicate that the subscriber's account balance satisfies the threshold requirement. Similarly, if a subscriber's account balance goes to zero, e.g., the subscriber consumes all of the subscriber's prepaid minutes, PPSCP 204 may, in addition to updating its own database PPDB 206, update that subscriber's status in prepaid account balance screening database 202. Alternatively, PPSCP 204 may inform back office 208 that the subscriber has a zero or negative balance, and back office 208 may use provisioning interface 210 to update prepaid account balance screening database 202 to indicate that the subscriber's account balance does not satisfy the threshold requirement. Other examples of threshold requirements include: allowing a call only if the subscriber's account balance is above a certain positive number, such as the minimum price of a call, for example; allowing a call only if the subscriber's account balance is above a certain negative number, which essentially extends only a certain amount of credit to a subscriber; or other decisions that may be based at least in part on a subscriber's pre-paid account balance.
An example of prepaid account balance screening is now explained with reference to
In this manner NE 200 avoids the unnecessary traffic of an IDP query and response to and from PPSCP 204/PPDB 206.
At block 300, a message containing information that identifies a prepaid subscriber is sent from a message source, such as MSC 212, and received by a network entity for processing network signaling messages, such as NE 200. The information identifying a prepaid subscriber may be a communications service subscriber identifier, such as a uniform resource identifier (URI), and/or any other information by which a prepaid subscriber may be identified, such as an international mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) number, a mobile station integrated services digital network (MSISDN) number, etc.
The message may be directly associated with a prepaid service; for example, the message may be a query to a prepaid service application, such as PPSCP 204. Alternatively, the message may be indirectly associated with a prepaid service; for example, the message may be to a service which itself may make a query to a prepaid service application. Alternatively, the message may invoke a service which should not be allowed unless the prepaid subscriber has a sufficient balance. Example messages indirectly associated with a prepaid service include queries to a mobile services node, such as an HLR and/or HSS, queries to a short message service node, such as a short message service center (SMSC), and response messages from a network service, such as an E.164 number mapping (ENUM) service or a domain name system (DNS) service.
The message may be sent to NE 200 but intended for a message destination other than NE 200. For example, NE 200 may receive a message that is sent route on global title (GT) or route on point code/subsystem number (PC/SSN), in which case NE 200 will determine the address of the intended message destination and route the message appropriately.
At block 302, a threshold query is performed for the identified prepaid subscriber, to determine whether or not that subscriber's account balance satisfies a threshold requirement. For example, NE 200 may query prepaid account balance screening database 202 to determine whether the prepaid subscriber has a zero balance. If the message contains information identifying more than one prepaid subscriber, NE 200 may query prepaid account balance screening database 202 for information about each identified subscriber.
At block 304, if the subscriber's account balance does not satisfy the threshold requirement, the process moves to block 306, in which NE 200 may forward the message to the message's intended destination. However, if at block 304 NE 200 determines that the subscriber's account balance satisfies the threshold requirement, NE 200 may take an appropriate action to shield PPDB 206 from query traffic relating to the prepaid subscriber's account, based upon the type of message received. For example, NE 200 may respond to the message on behalf of the message destination instead of sending it to the message destination (option 1, block 308); NE 200 may discard the message instead of sending it to the message destination (option 2, block 310); or NE 200 may modify the message and forward the modified message to the message destination (option 3, block 312). In all cases, if the prepaid subscriber's account balance satisfies the threshold requirement, the message received by NE 200 is forwarded to the message's destination (block 306). If, in block 300, the message received contains information that identifies additional prepaid subscribers (e.g., the message contains information that identifies more than one prepaid subscriber), blocks 302 through 312 may be repeated for each identified subscriber in turn.
In
NE 200 identifies a prepaid subscriber based on information contained in the message (
In this manner, the prepaid account balance screening shields both PPSCP 204 and HLR/HSS 400 from signaling message traffic associated with the prepaid subscriber's account.
Another exemplary process for performing prepaid account balance screening in accordance with another embodiment of the subject matter described herein will now also be described with reference to
In
In this manner, the prepaid account balance screening shields both PPSCP 204 and SMSC 402 from signaling message traffic associated with the prepaid subscriber's account.
In
In this manner, the prepaid account balance screening filters out extraneous URI values—i.e., values associated with the prepaid subscriber's account—from the ENUM response message that is provided to the ENUM query originator, thereby reducing the processing burden on the querying node, which in this case is MGC 500.
In
In
In this manner, the prepaid screening-enabled SLF 604 is adapted to effectively shield home subscriber servers 602 from unnecessary query traffic associated with the prepaid subscriber's account. If the subscriber passes screening, then SLF processing and call routing continues normally.
In embodiments where the prepaid account balance screening function is integrated with/co-located with a CSCF entity, such as a proxy-CSCF, the screening function effectively shields multiple IMS core network elements/resources from unnecessary signaling traffic via early rejection of call attempts to/from subscribers with insufficient prepaid balances.
The subject matter described herein is not limited to the messages described above, but may be applied to any situation where a query to a prepaid subscriber database will determine which subscribers will or will not have access to the network and/or to some or all of the network services.
It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
The presently disclosed subject matter claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/877,540 filed Dec. 28, 2006; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3917915 | Karras | Nov 1975 | A |
4162377 | Mearns | Jul 1979 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4385206 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1983 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756020 | Fodale | Jul 1988 | A |
4769834 | Billinger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788718 | McNabb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4897835 | Gaskill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897870 | Golden | Jan 1990 | A |
4959849 | Bhusri | Sep 1990 | A |
4972461 | Brown et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315580 | Phaal | May 1994 | A |
5341680 | Mains, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5402474 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5426688 | Anand | Jun 1995 | A |
5430709 | Galloway | Jul 1995 | A |
5438570 | Karras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457692 | Ishinabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457729 | Hamann et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473596 | Garafola et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521902 | Ferguson | May 1996 | A |
5539804 | Hong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546398 | Tucker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550914 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598464 | Hess et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602909 | Carkner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606600 | Elliott | Feb 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610977 | Williams et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625681 | Butler, II | Apr 1997 | A |
5689555 | Sonnenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
5696816 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740239 | Bhagat et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757895 | Aridas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764745 | Chan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768352 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768358 | Venier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771284 | Sonnenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784443 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796813 | Sonnenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5799073 | Fleischer, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802145 | Farris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867558 | Swanson | Feb 1999 | A |
5903726 | Donovan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915222 | Olsson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5995822 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009160 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1999 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028914 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6078584 | Mottishaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108332 | Kasiviswanathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111946 | O'Brien | Aug 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122352 | Kangas et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122510 | Granberg | Sep 2000 | A |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134307 | Broukman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134316 | Kallioniemi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138007 | Bharatia | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185414 | Brunner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208872 | Schmidt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249572 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321268 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351453 | Nolting et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393269 | Hartmaier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424621 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430277 | Roadifer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438223 | Eskafi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453158 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456708 | Copley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466796 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480588 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496690 | Cobo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510164 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535727 | Abbasi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584183 | Manto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633764 | Garcia | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6694153 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6963583 | Foti | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975852 | Sofer et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7181194 | McCann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7254391 | McCann | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260207 | Marsico | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7310415 | Short | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7333809 | Engelhart | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346022 | Roy | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7466807 | McCann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7729485 | Koskinen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764947 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7855982 | Ramankutty et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864752 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7876744 | Kwon | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7936866 | McCann | May 2011 | B2 |
8139735 | Cai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8213411 | Ayers et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8391833 | Agarwal | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020027983 | Suzuki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029189 | Titus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071530 | Hannigan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020110104 | Surdila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111153 | Hartmaier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150079 | Zabawskyj et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030142803 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190913 | Coad et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203740 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231623 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fukimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040106393 | Chowdhury et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176086 | Chatterjee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184594 | Schmechel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203641 | Hazlewood | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213393 | Bedingfiled et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233840 | Bye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240638 | Donovan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020680 | Emberty et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025114 | Bales et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050680 | Naim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060240819 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252425 | Jiang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258329 | Gruchala et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291486 | Cai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291488 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070042779 | Eikkula | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047539 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070127436 | Karimi-Cherkandi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127647 | Russell | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185809 | Duan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263565 | Roy | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090285225 | Dahod | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100184403 | Cai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202446 | McCann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110003579 | Cai et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110075675 | Koodli et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110225309 | Riley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120034900 | Agarwal | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120099715 | Ravishankar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130017803 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
ZL 200780017383.1 | Nov 2011 | CN |
0 088 639 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 212 654 | May 1987 | EP |
0 258 654 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 264 023 | Apr 1988 | EP |
1 100 279 | May 2001 | EP |
1 107 617 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 657 484 | May 2006 | EP |
1 425 932 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2382267 | May 2003 | GB |
58-215164 | Dec 1983 | JP |
62-200859 | Sep 1987 | JP |
1020030025024 | Mar 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0066043 | Aug 2003 | KR |
10-2006-0090378 | Aug 2006 | KR |
WO 8401073 | Mar 1984 | WO |
WO 8603915 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8800419 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0120920 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0122761 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163883 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02052834 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02054786 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03017697 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03103265 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005033841 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005089119 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006031678 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007050589 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007106563 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2010083509 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US07/26232 (May 15, 2008). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/724,590 for “Methods, Systems and Computer Program Products for Offloading Prepaid Status Queries from a Prepaid Status Database for Unlimited in-Network Prepaid Calls,” (Unpublished, filed Mar. 13, 2007). |
“Description of the SMS Prepaid Relay function implemented in the SRF equipment,” edition 0.1, unpublished, dated Jul. 2001. |
Notice of Allowance for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780017383.1 (Jun. 24, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,488 (Jul. 15, 2011). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,488 (May 6, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,488 (Jan. 31, 2011). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/021374 (Aug. 19, 2010). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/41449 (Jun. 20, 2007). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/277,626 (Feb. 27, 2013). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07753190.3 (Feb. 22, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,629 (Feb. 15, 2013). |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780051876.7 (Dec. 5, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/205,184 (Nov. 1, 2012). |
3GPP, “Policy and Charging Control Over Rx Reference Point,” 3GPP ETSI TS 29.214 version 8.3.0 Release 8 (Feb. 2009). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780017383.1 (Dec. 31, 2010). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent No. 2116021 (Oct. 14, 2009). |
Declaration of Gregory A. Hunt (Dec. 15, 2008). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 07753190.3 (Nov. 12, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US07/06543 (Aug. 29, 2008). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/724,590 (Aug. 14, 2008). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 02794890.0 (Mar. 18, 2008). |
“BICC Architecture and BICC Protocol Details,” Tekelec, pp. 28-41 (2008). |
“BICC Signaling Router (BSR) Reference Architecture (WP005274),” Tekelec, pp. 2-91 (2008). |
European Search Report for European Application No. 02794890.0 (Dec. 19, 2007). |
“GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP),” Trillium, Continuous Computing, pp. 1-3 (Copyright 2007). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Aug. 25, 2006). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Protocol or ISDN User Part (ISUP),” ETSI EN 383 001 V1.1.1 (Jun. 2006). |
Jennings et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) URIs for Application such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR),” The Internet Society, RFC 4458 (Apr. 2006). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Dec. 7, 2005). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Version 3,” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, ITU-T H.248.1 (Sep. 2005). |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Feb. 23, 2005). |
“Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol or ISDN User Part,” ITU-T Q.1912.5, pp. 1-101 (Mar. 2004). |
“Services and Protocols for Advanced Networks (SPAN); Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Capability Set 2 (CS2); Protocol Specification,” ETSI EN 302 213 V1.1.2 (Jan. 2004). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON) Release 4; Technology Mapping; Implementation of TIPHON Architecture Using BICC,” ETSI TS 102 228 V4.1.1 (Nov. 2003). |
Camarillo et al., “Mapping of Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) Overlap Signalling to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3578 (Aug. 2003). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US02/25789 (Dec. 10, 2002). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Broadband ISDN—Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer (SAAL); Signalling Transport converter on SCTP,” ITU-T Q.2150.3 (Dec. 2002). |
“Bearer Independent Call Bearer Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1950, p. 1-96 (Dec. 2002). |
Camarillo et al., “Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping,” Network Working Group, RFC 3398 (Dec. 2002). |
Vemuri et al., “Session Initiation Protocol for Telephones (SIP-T): Context and Architectures,” Network Working Group, RFC 3372 (Sep. 2002). |
Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 2002). |
Multiservice Switching Forum, “Implementation Agreement for BICC,” MSF-IA-BICC.001-FINAL (Feb. 2002). |
Marshall et al., “SIP Extensions for Supporting Distributed Call State,” SIP Working Group, Internet Draft, pp. 1-12 (Aug. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Basic Call Procedures,” ITU-T Q.1902.4 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part: Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.1902.3, pp. 1-141 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signaling System No. 7 ISDN user part: General Functions of Messages and Parameters,” ITU-T Q.1902.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.1902.1, pp. 1-23 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling, Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); BICC Bearer Control Tunnelling Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1990 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part; Signalling System No. 7—Application Transport Mechanism: Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Amendment 1: Bearer Independent Call Control Capability Set 2,” ITU-T Q.765.5 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC): Interworking Between Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.1 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Interworking Between Selected Signalling Systems (PSTN Access, DSS1, C5, R1, R2, TUP) and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b,” ITU-T Q.2150.1 (May 2001). |
“Generic Signalling Transport Service,” ITU-T Q.2150.0 (May 2001). |
“ITU-Q1970: Draft New ITU-T Recommendation Q.1970 BICC IP Bearer Control Protocol,” Network Dictionary (2001). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Transport Over Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP),” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, H.248.4 (Nov. 2000). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1901 (Jun. 2000). |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17, (Mar. 10, 2000). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Enhancements for the Support of Number Portability,” ITU-T Q.769.1 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.763 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part General Functions of Messages and Signals,” ITU-T Q.762 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.761 (Dec. 1999). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN Supplementary Services; ISDN User Part Supplementary Services,” ITU-T Q.730 (Dec. 1999). |
Liao et al., “SS7-TCAP/IP Interworking,” Internet Engineering Task Force, pp. 1-14 (Mar. 1999). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, pp. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Mobile Wireless Overview,” Cisco IOS Mobile Wireless Configuration Guide, pp. MWC-1-MWC-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Jun. 5, 2012). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05 724 466.7 (Apr. 10, 2012). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780051876.7 (Mar. 7, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Feb. 2, 2012). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 05724466.7 (Jun. 20, 2011). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Dec. 23, 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.399 V9.4.0, pp. 1-148 (Jun. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-111 (Mar. 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Dec. 7, 2009). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control Over Gx reference point (Release 9), 3GPP TS 29.212, V9.1.0, pp. 1-106 (Dec. 2009). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Apr. 2, 2009). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Aug. 21, 2008). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Apr. 11, 2008). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/807,691 (Dec. 21, 2007). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/070,940 (May 11, 2007). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/070,940 (Mar. 9, 2007). |
Notification of European publication number and Information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 05724466.7 (Nov. 22, 2006). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration in International Application No. PCT/US05/06926 (Oct. 11, 2006). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/070,940 (Jun. 20, 2006). |
Hakala et al., “Diameter Credit-Control Application,” Network Working Group RFC 4006, pp. 1-114 (Aug. 2005). |
“Prepaid vs. Number Portability,” Power Point presentation (publication date unknown; electronic file creation date Jul. 29, 2003). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, p. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07867984.2 (Jun. 18, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080160954 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60877540 | Dec 2006 | US |