The subject matter described herein relates to the bearer independent call control protocol. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for centralized routing and call instance code management for BICC signaling messages.
The bearer independent call control (BICC) protocol is a signaling protocol based on narrowband-ISDN user part (N-ISUP) that is used to support narrowband integrated services digital network (ISDN) service over a broadband backbone network. Specified by the International Telecommunications Union-Telecommunications Standardization Sector (ITU-T) in recommendations Q.1901 and Q.1902, BICC supports narrowband ISDN services independently of bearer and signaling message transport technology. The BICC architecture also separates the call control function from the bearer control function.
As specified by the ITU-T, a BICC-capable signaling point (SP) is statically provisioned with a routing table which associates, among other things, a range of call instance code or CIC values with each BICC SP in the mesh. These ranges are mutually agreed upon between the BICC SPs. ISUP uses the same acronym, CIC, for “circuit identification code” which identifies the circuit being used for end user communications. The circuit identifier code and the call instance code are each used by their respective protocol for the identification of a signaling relation between peer entities and the association of signaling messages to that relation. Unlike the circuit identification code in ISUP, the call instance code in BICC is not specified in the BICC standards documents as identifying a physical circuit. However, the call instance code in BICC can also be used to identify a physical circuit or bearer connection without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. The acronym, CIC, as used hereinafter, is intended to refer to the call instance code.
Prior to initiating a call, an originating BICC SP must select a destination BICC SP and an associated call instance code that is based, at least in part, on the called party's dialed digits. The originating BICC SP then sends a message to the destination BICC SP using the call instance code.
The ITU-T specifications also provide an element called a call mediation node (CMN). As specified, a CNM hosts a coordinating call service function (CSF-C) but lacks a bearer control function (BCF). A CSF-C communicates with all other types of CSFs (e.g., coordinating, gateway, nodal, transit). According to ITU-T Q.1202.4, when the CMN receives a signaling message, the CMN selects a free call instance code and sends the message to the next CSF. Q.1202.4 does not specify how the originating node selects the original call instance code to be included in the IAM message or steps to be performed by the CMN that are part of the same signaling session.
One problem not addressed in the BICC specifications is how a CMN interacts with the BICC-capable SPs within a mesh topology. As mentioned, the BICC SPs must bilaterally agree on the call instance code ranges used between them. If a CMN is present then this creates an additional barrier to communication. For example, if a BICC SP 1 sends a call setup message, it must first select an available call instance code associated with the destination BICC SP. If a CMN is in the middle of the mesh, BICC SP 1 does not know in advance which SP will receive the message, since when the CMN receives a message it performs a routing function that is unknown to the message originator. Therefore, BICC SP 1 cannot choose an appropriate call instance code to use. Furthermore, with full-mesh topology, each time a new BICC SP is added to the mesh, the routing tables of all BICC SPs and CMNs in the network must be updated or re-provisioned.
Another problem not addressed is congestion and unbalanced loads among BICC SPs. Since an originating BICC SP is unaware of the loading status of the selected destination or next-hop BICC SP, the originating BICC SP may be sending messages to a congested BICC SP when a less congested BICC SP is available, thereby exacerbating the congestion and decreasing throughput and efficiency of the network.
Thus, there exists a long felt need for methods, systems, and computer readable media for centralized routing and call instance code management that avoids at least some of the difficulties not addressed by the BICC specifications.
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems and computer readable media for centralized routing and call instance code management for bearer independent call control (BICC) signaling messages. One aspect of the subject matter described herein includes a system for routing BICC signaling messages and managing call instance code assignments. The system includes a BICC signaling router. The BICC signaling router includes a routing module for centralized routing of BICC signaling messages between a plurality of BICC signaling nodes. The BICC signaling router further includes a call instance code management module for centralized assignment of call instance codes for BICC signaling sessions routed through the BICC signaling router.
The subject matter described herein for centralized routing and call instant code management for BICC signaling messages can be implemented using a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer perform steps. Exemplary non-transitory computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include chip memory devices, disk memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integration circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across plural devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Prior to launching a call, an originating SP must select a destination SP and an available CIC associated with the destination SP based, at least in part, on the digits dialed by the calling party. As shown, SP A 102A sends a BICC call setup message 106 to SP D 102D using a CIC associated with SP D 102D. In the BICC call setup message, SP A 102A selects CIC 200 from the range of CIC values (200-299) associated with SP D 102D (i.e., point code 2-2-2) before sending message 106 to SP D 102D.
In order to provide connectivity to a new node in a fully connected mesh topology, each SP 102A-D must update or reprovision its routing table 104 whenever a new node is added. This updating or reprovisioning becomes very complex and expensive as nodes increase in the BICC network 100.
As stated above, an important feature in one embodiment of the present subject matter is the use of a BICC signaling router (BSR) for performing centralized routing and CIC management for a plurality of BICC-capable SPs. Using a BSR, SPs can route signaling messages without maintaining network management information about other SPs. This greatly decreases the cost and complexity of maintenance while allowing BSR to provide additional features such as load sharing more efficiently than at the SPs.
As shown, each SP 202A-D includes a routing table 204. Like in
BSR 208 may receive message 2061 and determine that message 2061 is addressed to a point code associated with BSR 208 and therefore requires processing. BSR 208 may be adapted to determine the appropriate destination SP (e.g., based on the CdPN), and to select an available CIC associated with the destination SP (DPC). As depicted, BSR 208 includes a routing module 210A, a routing database 210B, a CIC management module 212B, and a state information database 212B.
Routing module 210A performs centralized routing for BICC signaling messages. CIC management module 212B performs centralized management of CICs associated with signaling sessions routed through BSR 208. Using these database 210B or other information, BSR 208 may determine that SP B 202B is the appropriate destination SP (i.e., DPC=2-2-1) and may select, using database 212B, 250 as an available CIC associated with SP B 202B. BSR 208 may maintain a state mapping 214 including the originating SIP address (e.g., OPC) and originating CIC to the destination SP address (e.g., DPC) and destination CIC in state information database 212B. Additional state information may also be stored in state information database 212B. For example, the additional state information may include available CICs at each SP, congestion states for each SP, and relative loading of each SP.
In the illustrated example, BSR 208 may modify call setup message 2061 to include the new DPC and associated CIC and route modified call setup message 2062 to SP B 202B. BSR 208 may remain in the call signaling path processing subsequent BICC signaling messages associated with the call to insure continuity using state mapping 214 or other information. For example, SP B 202B may generate and send an acknowledgement message 2063 (e.g., BICC ISUP ACM) to BSR 208 after receiving message 2062. BSR 208 may examine and process message 2063 by replacing the DPC and associated CIC with the OPC and associated CIC of original call setup message 2061. BSR 208 may route modified acknowledgement message 2064 to SP A 202A.
Routing table 318 may contain information about how to process given signaling messages. As shown, routing table 318 contains three fields: a ‘CdPN/NPA-nxx’ field which contains the called party directory number or a portion thereof, a ‘Primary DPC’ field which contains the primary SP which handles calls for that number, and a ‘Secondary DPC’ field which contains the secondary SP which handles calls for that number if the primary SP cannot (e.g., if is down or congested). Status table 316 may contain information on whether a given DPC (i.e., SP) is available to handle signaling messages and whether any associated CICs are available. As shown, status table 316 contains three fields: a ‘DPC’ field which contains SP point codes, a ‘Status’ field which contains status information about the SP (e.g., available, unavailable, congested, etc.), and a ‘CIC Range’ which contains CICs available for reaching given SPs. BSR 208 may use these databases and other maintained information to dynamically determine how BICC traffic should be routed and load balanced among SPs 202 in network 200. In other words, the information maintained by BSR 208 may be used to monitor the overload or congestion status of SPs 202 in network 200, and to dynamically load balance call traffic among SPs 202.
As shown, SP A 202A may be adapted to select any available CIC from its routing table 204A and generate a call setup message 3061 associated with a call attempt or CdPN of 91938038134. SP A 202A may send message 3061 to the point code of BSR 208 (i.e., point code address 9-9-9). In one embodiment, an available CIC may correspond to an available UDP port. In this example, SP A 202A may select CIC 200 which is associated with BSR 208. A call setup message 3061 (e.g., BICC ISUP IAM) may be generated, which may include the associated CIC and the CdPN among other information, and may be transmitted to BSR 208. BSR 208 may receive message 3061 and determine that message 3061 is addressed to a point code associated with BSR 208, and therefore requires processing. BSR 208 may examine the CdPN in message 3061 and determine, using its routing table 318 and status table 316 that the call should be routed to SP D 202D (point code=2-2-2), the primary SP (DPC) for servicing calls to 9193803814.
The present subject matter may also present benefits with regard to BICC network management. It will be appreciated that since an originating SP may be unaware of where a call will terminate at the time the originating SP launches a call setup message 3061 (because from the perspective of the originating SP, all call setup messages 306 are routed to BSR 208 and the selected CIC is associated with BSR 208), the originating SP does not have to have direct knowledge of the status of other SPs 202 in the network. As such, BSR 208 may be adapted to receive network management messages from SPs 202 and to respond appropriately to the network management messages. Network management messages may include any information about network 200 or signaling points 202 in network 200. Appropriate actions taken in response to network management messages may include making adjustments to routing table 318, updating network status information in status table 316 for the affected SP, sending a message to the originating node or other nodes (e.g., SPs and BSRs), and the like.
For example, if BSR 208 receives a call setup message 3061 (e.g., BICC ISUP IAM) from SP A 202A, BSR 208 may examine the CdPN in the message and determine using central routing table 318 and status table 316 that message 3061 should be routed to SP D 202D (the primary node for servicing calls to 9193803814). BSR 208 may modify message 3061 (e.g., with a new DPC and CIC) and may route modified message 3062 to SP D 202D. SP D 202D may be congested and may respond to call setup message 3061 by generating and sending a BICC Overload message (OLM) 3063 to BSR 208. Upon receiving OLM message 3063 from SP D 202D, BSR 208 may also update status table 316 and other maintained information to reflect the information in OLM message 3063. BSR 208 may select a new destination and CIC, such as SP B 202B (i.e., the backup node for servicing calls to 9193803814) and associated CIC value of 250 and modify the original call setup message 3061 to include the newly selected destination and associated CIC. BSR 208 may route modified message 3064 to SP B 202B. As stated, BSR 208 may be a stateful application. As such, BSR 208 may remain in the call signaling path processing (e.g., intercepting, modifying, and redirecting) subsequent signaling messages associated with the call to insure continuity using the information maintained by the BSR.
Thus, in this embodiment, BSR 208 may relieve each SP 202A-D of the complex logic required to effect dynamic route management in network 200. Otherwise, each SP 202A-D in network 200 would be required to implement network management procedures and change their routing accordingly.
For example, SP A 202A may select any available CIC from its routing table 204A and generate a call setup message 4061 associated with a call attempt or CdPN of 91938038134. SP A 202A may send message 4061 to the point code address of BSR 208 (i.e., point code address 9-9-9). BSR 208 may receive message 4061 and determine that message 4061 is addressed to a point code address associated with BSR 208, and therefore requires processing. BSR 208 may examine the CdPN in message 4061 and determine, using its routing table 318 and other information that the call should be routed to SP D 202D (point code=2-2-2), the primary SP (DPC) for servicing calls to 9193803814.
BSR 208 may use status table 316 to determine that SP 202D (i.e., the primary DPC) is congested or overloaded. BSR 208 may determine, using routing table 318 and other information, message 4061 should be directed to the backup or secondary SP (DPC) for servicing calls to 9193803814, thereby avoiding congested SP 202D. As such, BSR 208 may select SP B 202B (point code=2-2-1) as the destination SP and an available CIC associated with SP B 202B (e.g., CIC 250). BSR 208 may modify call setup message 4061 to include BSR 208 point code address (i.e., 9-9-9) as the OPC, destination SP B 202B point code 2-2-1 as the new DPC, and the selected CIC associated with SP B 202B in modified message 4062. BSR 208 may map the originally specified CIC (i.e., 200) and OPC (i.e., 1-1-1) to the newly selected CIC (i.e., 250) and DPC (i.e., 2-2-1). This state mapping may be maintained by BSR 208. In one embodiment, this mapping may be maintained in state information database 212 (shown in
For example, BSR 208 may receive a call setup message 5061 (e.g., BICC ISUP IAM) from originating node SP A 202A that includes a called party identifier, such as a called party number (CdPN) of 9193803814. BSR 208 may query or access the NP database 520 and its subscriber table 522 using the CdPN value and obtain a routing number (RN) of RNx. The RN may be translated or mapped, using the switch table 524, to a point code of 1-1-2 which is associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may select an available CIC of 250 associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 5061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 5062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 5063 to BSR 208 using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 5063 and route modified message 5064 to originating node SP A 202A.
As shown, SP A 202A selects a CIC of 200, generates a call setup message 6061 including the called mobile subscriber identifier, and sends call setup message 606, to BSR 208 for processing. BSR 208 receives message 6061, extracts the called mobile subscriber identifier (the CdPN), generates an HLR query (e.g., a send routing information (SRI, location request, or other message) for requesting instructions for routing the call to the called mobile subscriber and send the query to HLR 626. HLR 626 responds with information, which identifies the mobile switching center (MSC) that is serving the called mobile subscriber. Using the information provided by HLR 626, BSR 208 may determine and select an appropriate SP (i.e., SP C 202C) and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify the message 6061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route the modified message 6062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 6063 to BSR 208 using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 6063 and route modified message 6064 to originating node SP A 202A.
It will be appreciated that in an alternate embodiment, BSR 208 may communicate/interface with other types of subscriber information and mobility management database servers, such as an IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) or Long Term Evolution (LTE) home subscriber server (HSS) or the like, to provide routing control functionality similar to that described above with respect to the GSM/I-S41 HLR embodiment.
For example, BSR 208 may receive a call setup message 7061 from originating SP A 202A. BSR 208 may access prepaid platform 728 determine that a called or calling party does not have sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call. BSR 208 may respond to the originating SP with an end or release message, thereby effectively blocking and preventing the call. Alternatively. BSR 208 may determine that there is sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call. If there is sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call. BSR 208 may modify and route call setup message 7061 as appropriate. For example, BSR 208 may determine and select an appropriate SP (i.e., SP C 202C) and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C for sending message 7061. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 7061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 7062 to SP C 202C.
In another embodiment. BSR 208, which may remain in the call signaling path, is adapted to interact or interface with the prepaid platform 728 to enforce a prepaid policy. That is, BSR 208 may monitor the prepaid credit balance of a called or calling prepaid subscriber using prepaid platform 728 and terminate the call at the point of credit exhaustion. For example, SP C 202C may send a response message 7063 back using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may determine if prepaid credit has been exhausted. If prepaid credit has been exhausted. BSR 208 may respond to SP C 202C or SP A 202A with an end or release message, thereby effectively blocking and preventing the call. If prepaid credit has not been exhausted, BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 7063 and route modified message 7064 to originating node SP A 202A.
Further, in this embodiment, BSR 208 may be adapted to identify calls to emergency service-related called party (e.g., a 911 call), and to permit such calls regardless of prepaid credit balance. Also, calls to the pre-paid service provider (i.e., for the purpose of reporting problems, re-charging the account, etc.) may also be identified and allowed regardless of prepaid credit balance.
Advanced routing services may include any advanced routing services described or defined within the Bellcore-Telcorida Intelligent Network (IN) or Advanced Intelligent Network (AIN) framework. Exemplary advanced routing services may include, but are not limited to: time-of-day, or day-of-week, least-cost routing, alternate carrier routing, etc.
For example, BSR 208 may receive a call setup message 8061 (e.g., BICC ISUP IAM message) from an originating node SP A 202A, where the call setup message 8061 includes a CdPN and a CIC. BSR 208 may consult advanced routing platform 830 for routing instructions. In one embodiment, the advanced routing instructions may be based on parameters not contained in the received call setup message 8061. For example, the advanced routing instructions may direct all calls made at a certain time of day or on a certain day of week to be routed through a specific carrier regardless of the calling or called party. In another embodiment, BSR 208 may extract information from the received call setup message 8061 (e.g., the CdPN) and use this information to query or access advanced routing platform 830. In one embodiment, advanced routing platform 830 may return a carrier identifier, which BSR 208 may subsequently map to a routable network address (e.g., a point code). In another embodiment, the advanced routing database may return a routable network address. Using the information provided by advanced routing platform 830. BSR 208 may determine and select SP C 202C as the appropriate intermediate or destination node and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 8061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 8062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 8063 to BSR 208 using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 8063 and route modified message 8064 to originating node SP A 202A.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may generate and launch a call setup message 9061 that includes a CIC and a toll-free called party identifier (e.g., an 800 number). BSR 208 may receive call setup message 9061 and extract the toll-free dialed digits or number from message 9061. BSR 208 may query or access toll-free database 932 using the extracted toll free number. Toll-free database 932 may return a translated CdPN identifier or number. Using this translated CdPN number, BSR 208 may determine and select SP C 202C as the appropriate intermediate or destination node and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 9061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 9062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 9063 back using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 9063 and route modified message 9064 to originating node SP A 202A.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may generate and launch a call setup message 10061 that includes a CIC, a calling party number (CgPN) identifier, and a called short code identifier (e.g., a 4-digit number). BSR 208 may receive the call setup message 10061 and extract both the CgPN identifier and the called short code identifier. BSR 208 may query or access a short code database using the CgPN and called short code identifiers. Short code database 1034 may include data structures which associate calling party and called short code tuples with a full 10 digit identifier or other fully-formatted (e.g., E.212, E.164, etc.) subscriber identifier. Short code database 1034 may return a fully specified, dialable subscriber identifier. Using the returned fully specified subscriber identifier. BSR 208 may determine and select SP C 202C as the appropriate intermediate or destination node and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 10061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 10062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 10063 to BSR 208 using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 10063 and route modified message 10064 to originating node SP A 202A.
This functionality in this embodiment enables BICC network subscribers to place calls to subscriber-specified, subscriber-specific short codes. These short code addresses are resolved at BSR 208, and call routing is determined based on the resolved short code identifier.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may generate and launch a call setup message 11061 that includes a CIC, a CgPN identifier, and a CdPN identifier. BSR 208 may receive the call setup message 11061 and, using the CdPN, may examine state information maintained by BSR 208. Using this information, BSR 208 may determine whether the called party is currently engaged on a call (i.e., busy) and if the CdPN and CgPN are the same. If the CdPN is not the same as the CgPN, but the CdPN is busy, then BSR 208 may determine which voice mail server to route the call to by querying or accessing VMS database 1136. VMS database 1136 may associate a voice mail subscriber with a voice mail server. If the CdPN and CgPN are the same, then BSR 208 may consult VMS database 1136 for determining the appropriate voice mail deposit or retrieval server. BSR 208 may determine and select SP C 202C as the appropriate intermediate or destination node of voice mail retrieval server and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 10061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 10062 to SP C 202C. SP C 202C may send a response message 10063 to BSR 208 using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response message 10063 and route modified message 10064 to originating node SP A 202A.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may generate and launch a call setup message 12061 that includes a CIC, a CgPN identifier, and a CdPN identifier. BSR 208 may receive the call setup message 12061 and may generate call detail records (CDR) associated with the call. In one embodiment, BSR 208 may include information in the CDR record that identifies the state information (i.e., OPC-DPC-CIC) mappings maintained by BSR 208. In one embodiment, the CDR is generated and stored at BSR 208. In another embodiment, BSR 208 is adapted to copy some or all of the signaling messages received and send the copied information to an off-board CDR platform or database. BSR 208 or the off-board CDR platform may use the copied information to generate CDRs and may use the CDRs or the copied signaling information for any suitable network data analysis application, including billing, billing verification, fraud detection, network planning, etc.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may generate and launch a call setup message 12061 that includes a CIC, a CgPN identifier, and a CdPN identifier. BSR 208 may receive the call setup message 12061 and subsequent signaling messages associated with a call from a calling party to a called party. Presence service update function 1342 associated with BSR 208 may be adapted to extract information from the signaling messages associated with the call and to generate a presence update message 1305 that includes, or indicates presence status information associated with the calling and/or called party. For example, presence update message 1305 may indicate the calling party is engaged on a call and is therefore busy. In one embodiment, presence update message 1305 is communicated to a presence server 1340 that is serving the calling or called party.
For example, BSR 208 may receive a call setup message 14061 from originating node SP A 202A. BSR 208 may access prepaid zero-balance database 1444 and determine that a called or calling party does not have sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call. BSR 208 may respond to the originating SP with an end or release message, thereby effectively blocking and preventing the call. Alternatively, BSR 208 may determine that there is sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call. If there is sufficient prepaid credit for the requested call, BSR 208 may process, modify, and route call setup message 14061 as appropriate. For example, BSR 208 may determine and select an appropriate SP (i.e., SP C 202C) and select an available CIC (i.e., 250) associated with SP C 202C for sending message 14061. BSR 208 may record necessary state information, modify message 14061 to include the selected CIC and point code of SP C 202C, and route modified message 14062 to SP C 202C.
Further, in this embodiment, BSR 208 may be adapted to identify calls to emergency service-related called party (e.g., 911 call), and to permit such calls regardless of prepaid credit balance. Also, calls to the pre-paid service provider may also be identified and allowed regardless of prepaid credit balance.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may select an available CIC associated with BSR 208. A call setup message 15061 may be generated and sent to BSR 208. Call setup message 15061 may include a CIC, a CgPN identifier, and a CdPN identifier. BSR 208 may receive call setup message 15061 and examine the CIC value specified in message 15061. BSR 208 may determine, using the CgPN or CdPN, that message 15061 should be offloaded to an IMS network. BSR 208 may maintain information in IMS offload database 1546 usable for making this determination. In the event that it is determined that the call should be offloaded to an IMSP network, BSR 208 may determine and select a BICC/SIP (e.g., BICC/IMS) gateway node 1548 as an intermediate destination for the call. BSR 208 may select a CIC associated with the chosen BICC/SIP gateway 1548. BSR 208 may record necessary state information. BSR 208 may modify message 15061 to include the selected CIC and point code of BICC/SIP gateway 1548. BSR 208 may route modified message 15062 to the BICC/SIP gateway 1548.
For example, an originating node SP A 202A may select an available CIC associated with BSR 208. A call setup message 16061 may be generated and sent to BSR 208. Call setup message 16061 may include a CIC, a CgPN identifier, and a CdPN identifier. BSR 208 may receive call setup message 15061 and examine the CIC value specified in message 16061. BSR 208 may determine, using the CgPN or CdPN, that message 16061 should be offloaded to an IMS network. BSR 208 may maintain information in IMS offload database 1546 used in making this determination. In the event that it is determined that the call should be offloaded to an IMS network, BSR 208 may terminate the call setup message 16061 (e.g., BICC ISUP IAM message) and generates a SIP INVITE message 16071 where SIP INVITE message 16071 is addressed to an SIP call session control function (CSCF) node 1652. BSR 208 may include or act as an IMS-interworking unit (I-IWU) 1650 as defined by ITU-T specification Q-1912.5. BSR 208 may specify a unique Dialog_ID and or Call_ID parameter value to be sent to CSCF 1652, and may map the originally specified CIC (e.g., 400) to the newly created Call_ID value. This CIC-Call_ID mapping, along with a source-destination node address mapping, may be maintained by BSR 208. Additional state information may also be maintained by BSR 208 related to the call or signaling session. CSCF node 1652 may send a response SIP message 16072 back using an available CIC associated with BSR 208. BSR 208 may use the recorded state information to modify response SIP message 16072 into message 16062 and route message 16062 to originating node SP A 202A.
BSR may use the maintained state information to dynamically determine how BICC traffic should be routed or load-shared among BICC and SIP nodes in a hybrid BICC-SIP networking environment. BSR 208 may process subsequent messages associated with the call, as necessary, to insure continuity of the call or signaling session.
It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/145,517, filed Jan. 16, 2009; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3917915 | Karras | Nov 1975 | A |
4162377 | Mearns | Jul 1979 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4385206 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1983 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756020 | Fodale | Jul 1988 | A |
4757267 | Riskin | Jul 1988 | A |
4769834 | Billinger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788718 | McNabb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4897835 | Gaskill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897870 | Golden | Jan 1990 | A |
4959849 | Bhusri | Sep 1990 | A |
4972461 | Brown et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5142622 | Owens | Aug 1992 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5208811 | Kashio et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239542 | Breidenstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315580 | Phaal | May 1994 | A |
5315641 | Montgomery et al. | May 1994 | A |
5341608 | Mains, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5384840 | Blatchford et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402474 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404395 | Bogart et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418844 | Morrisey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420916 | Sekiguchi | May 1995 | A |
5426688 | Anand | Jun 1995 | A |
5430709 | Galloway | Jul 1995 | A |
5430727 | Callon | Jul 1995 | A |
5438570 | Karras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457692 | Ishinabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457729 | Hamann et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473596 | Garafola et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5481603 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509010 | La Porta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521902 | Ferguson | May 1996 | A |
5533107 | Irwin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539804 | Hong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546398 | Tucker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550914 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568487 | Sitbon et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581558 | Horney, II et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583927 | Ely et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598464 | Hess et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602909 | Carkner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606600 | Elliott | Feb 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610977 | Williams et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625681 | Butler, II | Apr 1997 | A |
5638431 | Everett et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640446 | Everett et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651002 | Van Seters et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657452 | Kralowetz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664102 | Faynberg | Sep 1997 | A |
5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675635 | Vos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680552 | Netravali et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684951 | Goldman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689555 | Sonnenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
5696809 | Voit | Dec 1997 | A |
5696816 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5701301 | Weisser, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711011 | Urs et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712903 | Bartholomew et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5732213 | Gessel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740239 | Bhagat et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740374 | Raffali-Schreinemachers | Apr 1998 | A |
5757895 | Aridas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761281 | Baum et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761500 | Gallant et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764745 | Chan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764750 | Chau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764955 | Doolan | Jun 1998 | A |
5768352 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768358 | Venier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768361 | Cowgill | Jun 1998 | A |
5768525 | Kralowetz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771284 | Sonnenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774695 | Autrey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781534 | Perlman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784443 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787255 | Parlan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793771 | Darland et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796813 | Sonnenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5802285 | Hirviniemi | Sep 1998 | A |
5805587 | Norris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812781 | Fahlman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815669 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828844 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835583 | Hetz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838683 | Corley et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852660 | Lindquist et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867558 | Swanson | Feb 1999 | A |
5870565 | Glitho | Feb 1999 | A |
5872782 | Dendi | Feb 1999 | A |
5878126 | Velamuri et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878129 | Figurski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889954 | Gessel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892822 | Gottlieb et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903726 | Donovan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912887 | Sehgal | Jun 1999 | A |
5915222 | Olsson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917900 | Allison et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920562 | Christie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923659 | Curry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926482 | Christie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940598 | Strauss et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958016 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974052 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991301 | Christie | Nov 1999 | A |
5995608 | Detampel, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995822 | Smith et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009160 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1999 | A |
6011780 | Vaman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011794 | Mordowitz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011803 | Bicknell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014379 | White et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018515 | Sorber | Jan 2000 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023502 | Bouanaka et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026091 | Christie et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028914 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047005 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055302 | Schmersel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061432 | Wallace et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064653 | Farris | May 2000 | A |
6067546 | Lund | May 2000 | A |
6069890 | White et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075783 | Voit | Jun 2000 | A |
6076121 | Levine | Jun 2000 | A |
6078582 | Curry et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079036 | Moharram | Jun 2000 | A |
6084892 | Benash et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6084956 | Turner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094437 | Loehndorf, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097805 | Figurski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097960 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108332 | Kasiviswanathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsun et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111946 | O'Brien | Aug 2000 | A |
6112090 | Valentine | Aug 2000 | A |
6115383 | Bell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6118779 | Madonna | Sep 2000 | A |
6118780 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119160 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122255 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122263 | Dahlin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122365 | Yegoshin | Sep 2000 | A |
6122510 | Granberg | Sep 2000 | A |
6125111 | Snow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125177 | Whittaker | Sep 2000 | A |
H1880 | Vines et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
H1896 | Hoffpauir et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6128379 | Smyk | Oct 2000 | A |
6134235 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134246 | Cai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134307 | Brouckman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134316 | Kallioniemi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134618 | Hebert | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137874 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138007 | Bharatia | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144663 | Hallenstal | Nov 2000 | A |
6144667 | Doshi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144670 | Sponaugle et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151390 | Volftsun et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154467 | Hager et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157710 | Figurski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161012 | Fenton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185289 | Hetz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195425 | Farris | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201804 | Kikinis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215783 | Neyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236722 | Gilbert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249572 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285753 | Slusher | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321268 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327350 | Spangler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359979 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366655 | Book et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393269 | Hartmaier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411632 | Lindgren et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6424621 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434155 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438223 | Eskafi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445785 | Chan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453018 | Henry et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453158 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456708 | Copley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466796 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480588 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483837 | Howell et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483842 | Mauger | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496512 | Medhat | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496690 | Cobo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507649 | Tovander | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510164 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535727 | Abbasi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574481 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584183 | Manto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584190 | Bressler | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594258 | Larson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606668 | MeLampy et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631133 | Christie et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633764 | Garcia | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639981 | Dunn, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647113 | McCann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668051 | Ashdown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674748 | Dykhuizen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678242 | Simon | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6718018 | Henry et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728361 | Ouyang | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731741 | Fourcand et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795532 | Gross et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6836477 | West, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6865266 | Pershan | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6917612 | Foti et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6944666 | Belkin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963583 | Foti | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967956 | Tinsley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7010114 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072678 | Allison | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079853 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7181194 | McCann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187648 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7254391 | McCann | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260207 | Marsico | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7333809 | Engelhart | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7394818 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7864752 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8199892 | Ravishankar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213440 | Bantukul et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8606222 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8730970 | Allison et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20010030957 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040957 | McCann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046234 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046856 | McCann | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020023164 | Lahr | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027983 | Suzuki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029189 | Titus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048360 | Zambre et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054674 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020110104 | Surdila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111153 | Hartmaier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115441 | Alonso et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126708 | Skog et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136206 | Gallant et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150079 | Zabawskyj et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150221 | Carson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181673 | Henry et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196775 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030027591 | Wall | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061234 | Ali et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076941 | Tiliks et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081754 | Esparza et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091170 | McCann et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129991 | Allison et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131263 | Keane et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199281 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203740 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231623 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fukimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024894 | Osman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047341 | Staack et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052240 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091093 | Bookstaff | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095889 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106393 | Chowdhury et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121761 | Tripathy et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125757 | Mela et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131052 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040155757 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176086 | Chatterjee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184435 | Westman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233840 | Bye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240381 | Clark et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264671 | Lamberton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053213 | Giannoit | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050053223 | Bedingfield | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091157 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111632 | Caputo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050201362 | Klein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213740 | Williams et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220288 | Huey | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238048 | Delaney | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050281399 | Moisey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286531 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025114 | Bales et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029045 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060077965 | Garcia-Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079236 | Del Pino et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105766 | Azada et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177012 | Forney et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209791 | Khadri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210027 | Kafri | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234744 | Sung et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244744 | Kandori et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291486 | Cai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291488 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070094304 | Horner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121875 | Gruchala et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121908 | Benedyk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127436 | Karimi-Cherkandi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133574 | Tejani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167166 | Fleischer, III et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206747 | Gruchala et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070258575 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275738 | Hewes et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080031196 | Marathe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080488 | Marsico | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080139170 | Kahn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160954 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198862 | Bantukul et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198996 | Bantukul et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205603 | Allison et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215740 | Gruchala et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253362 | Samarasinghe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285735 | Ravishankar et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310613 | Fleischer, III et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010217 | Belling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017794 | Wilson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041225 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047980 | Wilson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090111489 | Wilson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090227276 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100040029 | Doppler et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056100 | Elman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093307 | Hui et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100157986 | Rao et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158201 | Vijay Marathe et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110216762 | Nas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101682674 | Nov 2013 | CN |
0 088 639 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 212 654 | May 1987 | EP |
0 258 654 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 264 023 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0 853 411 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 100 279 | May 2001 | EP |
1 107 617 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 443 740 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 657 848 | May 2006 | EP |
1 705 885 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1 269 764 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1 169 845 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2 116 021 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2 379 135 | Feb 2003 | GB |
2 382 267 | May 2003 | GB |
58-215164 | Dec 1983 | JP |
62-200859 | Sep 1987 | JP |
1020030025024 | Mar 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0066043 | Aug 2003 | KR |
10-2006-0090378 | Aug 2006 | KR |
10-2007-0093383 | Sep 2007 | KR |
WO 8401073 | Mar 1984 | WO |
WO 8603915 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8800419 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9711563 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9737502 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9828885 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9913653 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9951008 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0019758 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0022543 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0022840 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0030369 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0031933 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0033519 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0056032 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0060839 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0106679 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0120920 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0122761 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163883 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0172055 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0207456 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0239765 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02052834 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02058417 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02063849 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02078381 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02096147 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03001770 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03017697 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03039106 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004047459 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084530 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105405 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005033841 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005053203 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005083995 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006031678 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058275 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006102339 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007141762 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008042205 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008057259 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008085432 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008103333 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008103334 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008103371 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2010060087 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,772 (Aug. 24, 2011). |
Notice of Abandonment for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,800 (Aug. 3, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,298 (Jul. 7, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/106,057 (Oct. 27, 2010). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/021374 (Aug. 19, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/106,057 (Mar. 9, 2010). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/106,057 (Feb. 25, 2010). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/106,057 (Sep. 14, 2009). |
Notification of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 04819521.8 (Aug. 2, 2006). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US04/37389 (Jun. 22, 2005). |
“ENUM Driving Convergence in the Internet Age,” NeuStar (Publication Date Unknown). |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 04 81 9521 (Oct. 31, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,800 (Jan. 18, 2011). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/890,299 (Dec. 9, 2010). |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent No. 2074809 (Nov. 2, 2010). |
Invitation pursuant to Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) EPC for European application No. 00919712.0 (Aug. 25, 2010). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/890,299 (Apr. 15, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,772 (Mar. 25, 2010). |
European Search Report for European application No. 08153801.9 (Jan. 27, 2010). |
Communication of European Publication No. and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European U.S. Pat. No. 2116021 (Oct. 14, 2009). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jul. 24, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,772 (Jul. 14, 2009). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent No. 2074809 (Jun. 4, 2009). |
Ex parte Quayle for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (May 7, 2009). |
Communication regarding the expiry of the time limit within which notice of opposition may be filed for European Application No. 01920654.9 dated May 7, 2009. |
Notice of Abandonment for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Nov. 12, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2008/002220 (Jul. 8, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US08/02150 (May 20, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US08/02147 (May 20, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US07/26232 (May 15, 2008). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 4, 2008). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 02794890.0 (Mar. 18, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US07/20825 (Mar. 18, 2008). |
“BICC Architecture and BICC Protocol Details,” Tekelec, p. 28-41 (2008). |
“BICC Signaling Router (BSR) Reference Architecture (WP005274),” Tekelec, p. 2-91 (2008). |
European Search Report for European Application No. 02794890.0 (Dec. 19, 2007). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Sep. 20, 2007). |
Restriction/Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jun. 14, 2007). |
Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC corresponding to European application No. 01920654.9 dated May 2, 2007. |
Notice of Panel Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 2, 2007). |
“GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP),” Trillium, Continuous Computing, pp. 1-3 (Copyright 2007). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Aug. 25, 2006). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Aug. 25, 2006). |
“ENUM Use and Management for the Successful Deployment of ENUM-Enabled Services,” Lucent Technologies (Jul. 2006). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Protocol or ISDN User Part (ISUP),” ETSI EN 383 001 V1.1.1 (Jun. 2006). |
Jennings et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) URIs for Application such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR),” The Internet Society, RFC 4458 (Apr. 2006). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/718,292 (Feb. 16, 2006). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Dec. 28, 2005). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Dec. 7, 2005). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/718,292 (Oct. 27, 2005). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Version 3,” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, ITU-T H.248.1 (Sep. 2005). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jun. 2, 2005). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/718,292 (May 13, 2005). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/618,807 (Feb. 25, 2005). |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/218,402 (Feb. 23, 2005). |
“TeleSys Announces the Compatibility of Ericsson's Mobile Advantage Wireless Office and teleSys' MACH7-IP Gateway,” TeleSys Software-Press releast, pp. 1-2 (Publication Date Unknown) (Downloaded from the Internet on Oct. 5, 2004). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/618,807 (Jul. 27, 2004). |
Pai, “In-Building Wireless: The Next Generation,” TelephonyOnline.com, pp. 1-4 (Jun. 30, 2004). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (May 19, 2004). |
ETSI Guide, “Corporate Telecommunication Networks (CN); User Identification in a SIP/QSIG Environment,” ETSI EG 202 303 V1.1.1, pp. 1-25 (Apr. 2004). |
Faltstrom et al., “The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application (ENUM),” RFC 3761, pp. 1-16 (Apr. 2004). |
“Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol or ISDN User Part,” ITU-T Q.1912.5, p. 1-101 (Mar. 2004). |
Handa, “In Building Wireless: The Next Generation,” TMCnet.com, pp. 1-7 (Feb. 12, 2004). |
Restriction/Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jan. 9, 2004). |
“Services and Protocols for Advanced Networks (SPAN); Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Capability Set 2 (CS2); Protocol Specification,” ETSI EN 302 213 V1.1.2 (Jan. 2004). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON) Release 4; Technology Mapping; Implementation of TIPHON Architecture Using BICC,” ETSI TS 102 228 V4.1.1 (Nov. 2003). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/618,807 (Oct. 22, 2003). |
Fitchard, “A New Voice in the Boardroom,” Wireless Review, pp. 1-3 (Sep. 1, 2003). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 09/503,541 (Aug. 5, 2003). |
Camarillo et al., “Mapping of Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) Overlap Signalling to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3578 (Aug. 2003). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 09/503,541 (May 1, 2003). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 28, 2003). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/503,541 (Apr. 16, 2003). |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/618,807 (Apr. 15, 2003). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/503,541 (Mar. 11, 2003). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jan. 30, 2003). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US02/25789 (Dec. 10, 2002). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Broadband ISDN—Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer (SAAL); Signalling Transport converter on SCTP,” ITU-T Q.2150.3 (Dec. 2002). |
“Bearer Independent Call Bearer Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1950, p. 1-96 (Dec. 2002). |
Campbell et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Instant Messaging,” pp. 1-15 (Dec. 2002). |
Camarillo et al., “Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping,” Network Working Group, RFC 3398 (Dec. 2002). |
Vemuri et al., “Session Initiation Protocol for Telephones (SIP-T): Context and Architectures,” Network Working Group, RFC 3372 (Sep. 2002). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and Systems Aspects; Network Architecture (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 23.002, V5.7.0, p. 1-50, (Jun. 2002). |
“Fixed Wireless Technology,” ISP Planet, pp. 1-4 (May 14, 2002). |
Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 2002). |
Multiservice Switching Forum, “Implementation Agreement for BICC,” MSF-IA-BICC.001-FINAL (Feb. 2002). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/537,075 (Aug. 14, 2001). |
Marshall et al., “SIP Extensions for Supporting Distributed Call State,” SIP Working Group, Internet Draft, pp. 1-12 (Aug. 2001). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/537,075 (Jul. 25, 2001). |
Martinek, “Office on the Fly,” Wireless Review, pp. 1-4 (Jul. 15, 2001). |
“March Networks 3300 Integrated Communications Platform,” Mitel Networks Corporation, pp. 1-34 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Basic Call Procedures,” ITU-T Q.1902.4 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part: Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.1902.3, p. 1-141 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signaling System No. 7 ISDN user part: General Functions of Messages and Parameters,” ITU-T Q.1902.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.1902.1, p. 1-23 (Jul. 2001). |
“Description of the SMS Prepaid Relay Function Implemented in the SRF Equipment,” Edition 0.1, unpublished, dated Jul. 2001. |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling, Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); BICC Bearer Control Tunnelling Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1990 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part; Signalling System No. 7—Application Transport Mechanism: Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Amendment 1: Bearer Independent Call Control Capability Set 2,” ITU-T Q.765.5 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC): Interworking Between Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.1 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Interworking Between Selected Signalling Systems (PSTN Access, DSS1, C5, R1, R2, TUP) and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b,” ITU-T Q.2150.1 (May 2001). |
“Generic Signalling Transport Service,” ITU-T Q.2150.0 (May 2001). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/537,075 (Jan. 3, 2001). |
“ITU-Q1970: Draft New ITU-T Recommendation Q.1970 BICC IP Bearer Control Protocol,” Network Dictionary (2001). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Transport Over Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP),” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, H.248.4 (Nov. 2000). |
“Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); General Packet Radio Service (GPRS); GPRS Tunnelling Protocol (GTP) Across the Gn and Gp Interface (3GPP TS 09.60 version 7.6.0 Release 1998)”, ETSI TS 101 347, pp. 1-67 (Sep. 2000). |
Stewart et al., “Stream Control Transmission Protocol,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-10.txt (Jun. 16, 2000). |
Swartz, “Ready, Set, Wiireless Office!” Wireless Review, pp. 1-4 (Jun. 1, 2000). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1901 (Jun. 2000). |
“Telstra and Ericsson Trial Next Generation Wireless Office Solution,” Ericsson, pp. 1-2 (Apr. 28, 2000). |
“Mitel and Ericsson Join Forces to Deliver an Integrated Digital Wireless Office Solution with PBX Functionality-Company Business and Marketing,” Cambridge Telecom Report, pp. 1-4 (Apr. 24, 2000). |
“Market and Development Agreement Targets Customers Looking for Ways to Become More Productive Through Convenient and Cost-Effective Communication,” Ericsson Press Release, pp. 1-2 (Apr. 4, 2000). |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ieff-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 10, 2000). |
Aggarwal et al., “Transport Protocol for Presence Information/Instant Messaging,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pitp-mitp-01, Network Working Group, p. 1-21, (Mar. 9, 2000). |
Day et al., “A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging,” Request for Comments: 2778, Network Working Group, p. 1-17, (Feb. 2000). |
Day et al., “Instant Messaging/Presence Protocol Requirements,” Request for Comments: 2779, Network Working Group, p. 1-26, (Feb. 2000). |
Sulkin, “Emerging Options for Wireless PBXs,” Voice2000, pp. 1-8 (Feb. 2000). |
Stracke, J., “Message Information Data Format,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-midf-01.txt, Network Working Group, p. 1-4, (Jan. 19, 2000). |
Drzewianowski, “WLANs—For the Picking,” Communications Solutions™ Next-Gen Networks, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 2000). |
“The Wireless Business Connection,” Second Quarter 2000 report, The Phillips Group—Infortech, pp. 1-9 (2000). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Enhancements for the Support of Number Portability,” ITU-T Q.769.1 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.763 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part General Functions of Messages and Signals,” ITU-T Q.762 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.761 (Dec. 1999). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN Supplementary Services; ISDN User Part Supplementary Services,” ITU-T Q.730 (Dec. 1999). |
“Ericsson Announces General Availability of Its Mobile Advantage Wireless Office System,” Ericsson Press Release, pp. 1-2 (Nov. 4, 1999). |
Tekelec, “IP7 Secure Gateway Release 1.0”, Tekelec Release Documentation, 910-2046-01 Revision A (Nov. 1999). |
O'Shea, “Mating Season,” Telephony, pp. 10-11 (Sep. 20, 1999). |
“Corporate Offices to go Wireless First Australian GSM on the Net Trial,” Ericsson Press Release, pp. 1-3 (Aug. 11, 1999). |
Anonymous, “Operations, Maintenance and Administration Part,” International Telecommunications Union, p. 485-531 (Jul. 27, 1999). |
General Signal Networks, “SS7 Performance Management System,” www.gsnetworks.com/powerof7/index.html (Downloaded Jul. 18, 1999). |
Danar Corporation, “About Syzgy,” (Downloaded Jul. 14, 1999). |
HomiscoNoicenet Inc., “Features,” www.homisco.com/SS7/page7.html (Downloaded Jul. 14, 1999). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Universal Mobile Telecommunications System; Mobile Radio Interface Layer 3 Specification, Core Network Protocols—Stage 3,” TS 24.008 V3.0.0 (Jul. 1999). |
“Ericsson Solution Chosen for World's First Combined DECT/GSM Communications Service,” Ericsson, pp. 1-9 (Jun. 21, 1999). |
Waveteck Wandel Goltermann, “8620 SS7 Signaling Surveillance System,” Switching Test Solutions AG (Jun. 15, 1999). |
Hamdi et al., “Voice Service Interworking for PSTN and IP Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 104-111 (May 8, 1999). |
Lakshmi-Ratan, “The Lucent Technologies Softswitch—Realizing the Promise of Convergence,” Bell Labs Technical Journal, pp. 174-195 (Apr.-Jun. 1999). |
Dunn, “Triggerless LNP,” Tekelec Eagle, p. 1-42 (Mar. 31, 1999). |
Vittore, “Enhanced Offerings Shoot for Easy,” Telephony, p. 48, 50 & 51 (Mar. 8, 1999). |
Hanley, “Fight for the Future: Test Vendors Try to Get the Edge on Unstandardized Technology with Flexible, Forward-Thinking Products,” Telephony, p. 52-54 (Mar. 8, 1999). |
Handley et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” Request for Comments: 2543, Network Working Group, p. 1-111, (Mar. 1999). |
Liao et al., “SS7-TCAP/IP Interworking,” Internet Engineering Task Force, pp. 1-14 (Mar. 1999). |
“Enterprise IP Gateway,” Ericsson, pp. 1-6 (1999). |
“The Ericsson IPT System,” Ericsson, pp. 1-8 (1999). |
Johanson et al., “Mobile Advantage Wireless Office—A Digital Wireless Office System for TDMA/136 Networks,” Ericsson review No. 1, pp. 20-27 (1999). |
Lin et al., “Number Portability for Telecommunication Networks,” IEEE, p. 56-62 (1999). |
“PCS Access Network Requirements: Product Specification for Network Element: Gateway Signaling Transfer Point Between CCS/SS7 & TCP-IP Networks (GW-STP-IP)”, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 3, 1998). |
“PCS Access Network Requirements: Interface Specification; Interface: Service Access Socket System Interface (SASSI),” Version 01.01, pp. 1-42 (Dec. 3, 1998). |
“Wireless: Top Ericsson Executives Lay Out Corporate Vision, Unveil Strategy for the Enterprise Customer—Company Business and Marketing,” EDGE, On & About AT&T, pp. 1-5 (Nov. 30, 1998). |
Rosenberg et al., “SIP for Presence,” IETF, draft-rosenberg-sip-pip-00.txt, p. 1-22 (Nov. 13, 1998). |
Levine, “Pancaking Portability,” America's Network, p. 55-56 (Oct. 1, 1998). |
Data Gulper, “Load Your Data Warehouse 10 Times Faster. Concurrently Load up to 500+ Online Feeds. Filter Out Useful Data and Store it Quickly,” Compendium Research Corporation (May 2, 1998). |
“Ericsson Wireless Office Services to Provide Digital System Through AT&T Wireless Services,” Ericsson Press Release, pp. 1-2 (Apr. 17, 1998). |
Handley et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” Request for Comments: 2327, Network Working Group, p. 1-42, (Apr. 1998). |
TEKELEC, “Feature Guide Eagle STP,” P/N 910-1225-01 Revision B (Jan. 1998). |
TEKELEC, “Feature Guide LNP LSMS,” P/N 910-1598-01 Revision A (Jan. 1998). |
Chen, “Local Number Portability: Operations Impact and Architecture,” BellSouth Telecommunications, p. 973-981 (1998). |
McGrew, “Transport SS7 Signalling Over IP,” Lucent Technologies Inc., p. 1-8 (1998). |
O'Shea, “The Network That's Never Done,” Telephony, p. 39, 40, 42 & 43 (Sep. 15, 1997). |
DSC Communications, “DSC Signs Agreements with unisys for Intelligent Network Measurement and Monitoring Systems,” Press Release (Jul. 15, 1997). |
O'Shea, “The Great Seeping Software Takeover,” Telephony, p. 32, 36, 38, & 42 (Jun. 30, 1997). |
Tekelec, “Eagle STP: STP-LAN Interface Feature,” (May 2, 1997). |
Anonymous, “Alliances,” Communications Week, p. 14-15 (Apr. 7, 1997). |
Engebretson, “Much Ado About Numbers,” Telephony, p. 22-24, 26, & 28 (Apr. 7, 1997). |
Bellcore, “NetPilot™-STP Interface for Administration of STP-Based Local Number Portability (LNP) Translations,” Bellcore Communications Research, SR-4251, Issue 1, p. 1-239 (Mar. 1997). |
Smith, “Number Portability Pileup,” Telephony, p. 22, 24, & 26 (Jan. 6, 1997). |
Rice, Patt, “Local Number Portability,” Phone + Magazine, p. 1-2 (1997). |
Tekelec, “Eagle (Registered) STP Platform,” 908-0126-01 (1997). |
Tekelec, “Eagle STP Database Transport Access Feature,” 908-0136-01 (1997). |
Tekelec, “Eagle STP X.25 to SS7-IS.41 Protocol Conversion Feature,” 908-0135-01 (1997). |
Tekelec, “Eagle STP ANSI-ITU gateway Feature,” 908-0133-01 (1997). |
Tekelec, “SS7-Frame Relay Access Device SS7 Protocol Information Translator,” 908-0167-01 (1997). |
Snyder, “Testing Portability Possibilities,” Telephony, p. 70 (Nov. 18, 1996). |
Synder, “Rerouting Internet Traffic Jams,” telephony, p. 12 (Nov. 11, 1996). |
Snyder, “Branded With Optics,” Telephony, pp. 49-50 (Jul. 22, 1996). |
Anonymous, “Around the Loop,” Telephony, p. 26 (Jul. 22, 1996). |
Anonymous, “Generic Switching and Signaling Requirements for Number Portability,” AT&T Network Systems, Issue 1, p. 1-75 (Feb. 2, 1996). |
Interface Recommendation for Intelligent Network CS-1, ITU-T Q.1218 (Oct. 1995). |
Hewlett Packard, “HP acceSS7 Signaling Monitoring System,” Hewlett Packard Co. (May 2, 1995). |
Woods, “Fresno Bee Still Buzzing About Wireless,” TechNews, pp. 1-2 (1995). |
Tekelec, “Proposal for MCI Billing System,” (Nov. 2, 1993). |
Tekelec, “Common Channel Signaling System 7 Link Monitoring,” Response to Request for Proposal from Southwestern Bell Telephone (Jul. 2, 1993). |
Blake, “Fast, Smart and in Cotnrol Signaling System 7 is Helping Bring the Intelligent Network to the End User,” In Perspective, p. 20-23 (May 2, 1993). |
Bellcore, “Generic Requirements for Common Channel Signaling (CCS) Network Usage Measurement Functionality,” Technical Advisory, p. 1-76 (Dec. 2, 1992). |
Kritzmacher et al., “Recommendations for SS7 Reliability,” TE&M, p. 35, 36, & 38 (Nov. 1, 1992). |
Bellcore, “Request for Industry Input: Extending a Signal Transfer Point Adjunct Beyond Usage/Billing Measurements,” Digest, p. 33 (Jun. 2, 1992). |
Tekelec, “IDS Enhanced Gateway Billing Ssytem User's Manual,” , (Jan. 22, 1992). |
Federal Communications Commission, “Notice of Inquiry,” Federal Communications Commission (Dec. 6, 1991). |
Hester, “Can You Afford to be Without SS7 Network Surveillance,” Telephony (Dec. 3, 1990). |
Lanning, “SS7 Interconnection Awaits Green Light,” Telephony's Tranmission Special, p. 32 & 34 (Nov. 2, 1990). |
Telcordia Technologies, “A Framework of High-Level Requirements and Considerations for Common Channel Signaling Network Usage Measurements to Support Billing and Bill Verification,” Framework Technical Advisory, p. 1-40, A-1-R-4 (Jan. 2, 1990). |
Zaharychuk et al., “ICC/SUPERCOM '90,” IEEE, p. 223, 2.1-223.2.8 (1990). |
Buckles, “SS7 Gateways Serve and Protect,” Telephony, p. 39-41 & 44 (Nov. 20, 1989). |
Rusin, “Voice Processing and the Intelligent Network,” TE&M, p. 51-68 (Mar. 1, 1989). |
Anonymous, “An Independent Future,” Rural Telecommunications (1989). |
Anonymous, “A New Network,” TE&M (Dec. 1, 1988). |
Marshall, “Maintaining the CCS Network,” TE&M, p. 78-80 (Nov. 1, 1988). |
Strusser, “Call Accounting Needs Five New Features,” Business Communication Review, p. 45-48 (Sep. 28, 1988). |
Anonymous, “Independent SS7 Network Questions and Answers,” (Aug. 2, 1988). |
Parsons, “Update: Financial Considerations and Network Control Most Important for Independent Telcos Examining SS7,” p. 1-4 (Aug. 2, 1988). |
Hilton et al., “Common Channel Signaling for Independents,” TE&M (Jun. 15, 1988). |
Anonymous, “Independent SS7 Network SSP Solutions,” (May 2, 1988). |
Parsons, “A800: A Decision to Remain Independent,” p. 1-4 (May 2, 1988). |
Bootman et al., “Intelligent Network Services Using a Service Switching Node,” IEEE, pp. 40.7.1-40.7.4 (1988). |
Bootman et al., “Generic Blocks for the Telecommunications Management Network,” IEEE, pp. 6.1.1-6.1.5 (1988). |
Buckles, “Very High Capacity Signaling Transfer Point for Intelligent Network Services,” IEEE, p. 40.2.1-40.2.4 (1988). |
Faletti et al., “Signaling System #7: The Corporate Network Backbone,” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Hollywood, Florida, p. 10.2.1-10.2.9 (1988). |
Anonymous, “American National Standard for Telecommunications—Monitoring and Measurements for Signaling System 7 Networks,” (1988). |
Rose, “Understanding the Intelligent Network,” OPASTCO Roundtable (1988). |
Titch, “The Pipe and the Protocol,” Closeup Supplement to Communications Magazine (1988). |
Protocol Technologies, “#7 MGTS Monitor Trap Overview,” MGTS User's Guide, p. 5.9.0-5.9.36 (Dec. 2, 1987). |
Protocol Technologies, “Protocol Technologies User's Guide: Message Generator/Traffic Simulator,” p. 1-1-8-2 (Apr. 2, 1987). |
Chow et al., “CCITT Signaling System No. 7: The Backbone for Intelligent Network Services,” Globecom, p. 40.1.1-40.1.5 (1987). |
Worrall, “Vitural Network Capabilities—The Next Phase of the ‘Intelligent Network’,” Globecom (1987). |
Anonymous, “Automatic Message Accounting Teleprocessing System (AMATPS) Generic Requirements,” Telcordia Technologies, Inc. (Abstract Only) (Sep. 2, 1986). |
Anonymous, “Systems Engineering Requirements for the 1ESS Switch Automatic Message Account Trasmitter (AMAT),” Telcordia Technologies, Inc. (Abstract Only) (Nov. 2, 1985). |
Szybicki, “Adaptive, Tariff Dependent Traffic Routing and Network Management in Multi-Service Telecommunications Networks,” Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., p. 614-621 (Sep. 4-11, 1985). |
Hayward, “Traffic Engineering in a New Competitive Environment,” Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., p. 1112-1116 (May 24, 1985). |
Wang et al., “Database Administration System—Architecture and Design Issues,” The Bell System Technical Journal, p. 2438-2458 (Nov. 24, 1982). |
Anonymous, “The ABC's of LNP,” Supplement to America's Network, p. S3-S4 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Anonymous, “Billing Usage Measurements/Automatic Message Accounting,” Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Project Abstacts (Publication Date Unknown). |
Anonymous, “Isn't it Ironic . . . ,” Supplement to America's Network, p. S5-S7 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Anonymous, “The Sterling Data Server Family: The Advanced Intelligent Network Billing Mediation Platform,” Telesciences (Publication Date Unknown). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, p. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Mobile Wireless Overview,” Cisco IOS Mobile Wireless Configuration Guide, pp. MWC-1-MWC-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Sette, “Intermediate Signaling Network Identification,” Bellcore, p. 1-10 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Sette, “Intermediate Signaling Network Identification,” (Publication Date Unknown). |
Decision of Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880012885.X (May 6, 2013). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780051876.7 (Mar. 7, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/065745 (Jun. 15, 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; IP Multimedia Call Control Protocol Based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3 (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 24.229 V5.22.0 (Sep. 2008). |
Garcia-Martin et al., “Private Header (P-Header) Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3455 (Jan. 2003). |
Young-Fu Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Lucent Technologies draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt (Sep. 2001). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Oct. 31, 2012). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,017 (Oct. 24, 2012). |
Noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC for European Application No. 08725747.3 (Aug. 28, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,017 (Apr. 11, 2012). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,677 (Apr. 6, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,772 (Mar. 15, 2012). |
Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,772 (Feb. 24, 2012). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880012488.2 (Feb. 15, 2012). |
Notice of Abandonment for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,298 (Feb. 2, 2012). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880012885.X (Jan. 11, 2012). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 08725747.3 (Dec. 23, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,677 (Dec. 6, 2011). |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880012488.2 (Dec. 28, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/890,299 (Mar. 26, 2013). |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880012885.X (Sep. 27, 2012). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,677 (Feb. 19, 2013). |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780051876.7 (Dec. 5, 2012). |
Decision of Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780048418.8 (Jul. 4, 2012). |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780048418.8 (Mar. 23, 2012). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,723 (Feb. 23, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,723 (Jan. 18, 2012). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,723 (Sep. 29, 2011). |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780048418.8 (Jun. 15, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,723 (Feb. 17, 2011). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent No. 2084861 (Jul. 8, 2009). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searchig Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US07/22664 (Mar. 14, 2008). |
Roach, “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)—Specific Event Notification,” Network Working Group, RFC 3265 (Jun. 2002). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,677 (Oct. 7, 2013). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 08725814.1 (Sep. 23, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/890,299 (Aug. 6, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Jul. 5, 2013). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 08725750.7 (Jul. 8, 2013). |
Notice of Granting Patent Right for Invention for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780051876.7 (Jun. 26, 2013). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07839798.1 (Jun. 19, 2013). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07867984.2 (Jun. 18, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,017 (Dec. 22, 2014). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 4447/CHENP/2009 (Nov. 24, 2014). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 07 867 984.2 (Oct. 22, 2014). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 5612/CHENP/2009 (Oct. 10, 2014). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 5562/CHENP/2009 (Sep. 17, 2014). |
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Application No. 200780048418.8 (Jul. 23, 2014). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 2935/CHENP/2009 (Jun. 23, 2014). |
First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 2112/CHENP/2009 (Jun. 6, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/891,677 (Dec. 31, 2013). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Nov. 21, 2013). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Oct. 24, 2013). |
Notice of Granting Patent Right for Invention for Chinese Application No. 200880012488.2 (Jul. 15, 2013). |
Rejection Decision for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780048418.8 (Mar. 31, 2015). |
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880012885.X (Mar. 11, 2015). |
Reexamination Decision for Chinese Application No. 200880012885.X (Jun. 26, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Jun. 18, 2015). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 5563/CHENP/2009 (Apr. 24, 2015). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100202446 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61145517 | Jan 2009 | US |