The subject matter described herein relates to updating a presence system. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to providing geo-location proximity updates to a presence system based on mobile network information.
Mobile communications networks routinely generate and exchange network-specific identifying information between mobile handsets and various network entities. Network specific identifiers (NSIDs) may include information such as a Cell ID identifying the network cell in which the mobile user is currently operating or an MSC address identifying the MSC currently serving the mobile subscriber. NSIDs may not provide a precise location of a particular mobile subscriber because the network specific resource identified by the NSID may be shared by multiple users spread over a given geographical area. For example, the accuracy provided by a Cell ID can be as good as a few hundred meters in urban areas or as poor as 35 km in suburban areas and rural zones, depending on the range of the network base station serving the handset at the time of positioning.
In addition to geographically imprecise information (i.e., NSIDs), mobile communications networks also routinely generate and exchange location information that provides a precise location of mobile users. For example, a mobile handset equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) receiver may determine its geographical position to within an accuracy of +/−5 meters using information provided by multiple orbiting GPS satellites.
In addition to NSIDs and location information, mobile subscribers may generate and exchange presence information with a presence system for indicating the mobile subscriber's status to one or more associated watchers (aka, watching presentities). Typically, presence information is information indicating whether someone's availability to communicate (e.g., via IM). Presence information is also typically expressed in a format that is more easily understood by watchers because watchers are typically other human beings (e.g., friends in an IM list).
One problem associated with using NSID information as input to a presence systems is that NSID information (e.g., MSC identifier, Cell ID, Location Area, etc.) has little or no meaning to a presence system user (e.g., a watcher). Furthermore, indicating to a friend that one is located at 35° 59′N 78° 54′W may be significantly less useful than indicating that one is located “near Southpoint Mall.” Likewise, indicating that one has moved from Cell ID 1214 to Cell ID 1215 is significantly less useful than indicating that one is jogging Downtown.
Another problem associated with presence system geo-location information relates to the distribution of precise geo-location information, such as precise GPS coordinate information once it has been obtained or ascertained. In certain situations, the distribution of precise GPS coordinates (e.g., geo-location coordinates accurate to within a few meters) to watchers may not be desired. For example, a parent may not want for their child to willingly (or unwittingly) allow a watcher to obtain such precise geo-location information associated with their child.
Accordingly, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer readable media for interworking between NSIDs, location information, and presence systems.
The subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing geo-location proximity updates to a presence system. One method includes intercepting a mobility management message associated with a mobile subscriber, wherein the mobility management message includes one or more network specific identifiers (NSIDs). A geo-location proximity descriptor is determined based on the one or more NSIDs. The geo-location proximity descriptor is then communicated to a presence system.
According to another aspect, a method for translating location information into a geo-location proximity descriptor is provided. One method includes intercepting a signaling message associated with a mobile subscriber, wherein the mobility management message includes location information. A geo-location proximity descriptor is determined based on the location information. The geo-location proximity descriptor is communicated to a presence system.
The subject matter described herein for providing geo-location proximity updates to a presence system can be implemented using a computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions that when executed by a processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer readable media, such as chip memory devices or disk memory devices accessible by a processor, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single computing platform or may be distributed across plural computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing geo-location proximity updates to a presence system. As mentioned above, there are two types of information exchanged between mobile communications network entities: NSIDs and location information. Because NSIDs are directed to identifying logical network resources or network service areas, they only indirectly associated with the location of mobile subscribers. Location information, in contrast, is directed to identifying the location of mobile subscribers and is therefore directly associated with the location of mobile subscribers. Furthermore, because the types of messages and specific network entities involved in NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor and location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor are typically different and separate, each type of translation will be discussed separately for clarity of discussion.
In step 102, a geo-location proximity descriptor is determined based on the one or more NSIDs. For example, the SGSN address 9191110001 may be associated with geo-location proximity descriptor “West Chapel Hill,” or Cell ID 1214 may be associated with geo-location proximity descriptor “near Southpoint Mall.” As a result, NSIDs, which have no meaning to a watching presentity and which are not provided to a presence system, may be translated into a format usable by a presence system. It is understood that NSIDs may not provide a precise geographic location of a mobile user, but rather may indicate an imprecise geographic area in which the mobile user may be found. The mapping or associating of a “precise” NSID (e.g., MSC ID, Cell ID, etc.) or a precise geo-location identifier (e.g., GPS coordinates) to an imprecise geographic location is referred to herein as a “fuzzy” location determination. Thus, in step 102, a translation may be performed between a first type of precise data (i.e., one or more NSIDs) and a second type of fuzzy data (geo-location proximity descriptor).
In step 104, the geo-location proximity descriptor is communicated to a presence system. For example, a presence update message including the geo-location proximity descriptor determined in step 102 may be communicated to a presence server. Because the geo-location proximity descriptor included in the presence update message is understandable by the presence server, the presence server is able to indicate that the location of mobile user associated with the mobility management message intercepted in step 100 is “West Chapel Hill” or “near Southpoint Mall.”
2G handset 200 may include any mobile communications handset capable of communicating over a second generation (2G) cellular network. Exemplary 2G networks include both time division multiplexed (TDMA)- and code division multiplexed (CDMA)-based networks including, but not limited to, GSM, IS-41, IS-95, IS-136, iDEN, PDC, or PCS networks.
MSC 202 includes a switch that is a component of the network switching subsystem and that connects to one or more BSCs via the A interface. The network switching subsystem (NSS) is a component of GSM networks that carries out switching functions and manages the communications between mobile phones and the public switched telephone network (PSTN). The NSS, also referred to as the GSM core network, refers to the circuit-switched core network used for traditional GSM services such as voice calls, SMS, and circuit switched data calls. Additionally, an overlay architecture on the GSM core network known as the GPRS core network provides packet-switched data services and allows mobile phones to access services, such as WAP, MMS, and the Internet. MSC 202 may be the primary service delivery node for GSM and may be responsible for handling voice calls and SMS. MSC 202 may set up and release end-to-end connections, handle mobility and hand-over during a call, take care of charging, and perform real time pre-paid account monitoring. It is appreciated that MSC 202 may include one of a gateway MSC (G-MSC), a visited MSC (V-MSC), or a mobile switching centre server (MSCS). A G-MSC is an MSC that determines which visited MSC the subscriber who is being called is currently located. A V-MSC refers to the MSC where a customer is currently located. A MSCS refers to a soft-switch variant of MSC 202 and may provide circuit-switched calling, mobility management, and GSM services to the mobile phones roaming within the area that it serves.
GLPF 204 may include a combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware for translating NSIDs or location information into geo-location proximity descriptors and providing the geo-location proximity descriptors to a presence system. In one embodiment, GLPF 204 may be co-located with or integrated with a signaling transfer point (STP) or a signaling gateway (SG). In another embodiment, GLPF 204 may be located separately from the STP/SG and may be communicatively coupled with or otherwise associated with means for intercepting mobility management messages transmitted between MSC 202 and HLR 208. NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor DB 206 may likewise be co-located with, integrated with, or separately located from GLPF 204.
NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor DB 206 may include records for translating NSIDs and geo-location data into geo-location proximity descriptors.
HLR 208 may include a logically central database that contains details of each mobile phone subscriber that is authorized to use the GSM core network. There may be several logical and physical HLRs per public land mobile network (PLMN), though one IMSI/MSISDN pair can be associated with only one logical HLR (which can span several physical nodes) at a time. The subscriber's current location stored in HLR 208 includes the VLR address currently serving the subscriber. The HLR stores details of every SIM card issued by the mobile phone operator. Each SIM has a unique identifier called an IMSI which is the primary key to each HLR record. Records in HLR 208 may also contain information associated with supplementary services, basic service subscription information, and service restrictions (e.g., roaming permissions).
Other items of data associated with the SIM are the MSISDNs, which are the telephone numbers used by mobile phones to make and receive calls. The primary MSISDN is the number used for making and receiving voice calls and SMS, but it is possible for a SIM to have other secondary MSISDNs associated with it for fax and data calls. Each MSISDN is also a primary key to the HLR record. The HLR data is stored for as long as a subscriber remains with the mobile phone operator. An example of other data stored in the HLR against an IMSI record includes data for the GSM services that the subscriber has requested or been given. GPRS settings to allow the subscriber to access packet services, current location of subscriber (VLR and serving GPRS support node/SGSN), and call divert settings applicable for each associated MSISDN.
HLR 208 receives and processes MAP transactions and messages from elements in the GSM network. For example, HLR 208 may receive and process location update messages received from mobile handsets as they roam. HLR 208 may connect to one or more of the following elements: a G-MSC for handling incoming calls, one or more VLRs for handling requests from mobile phones to attach to the network, an SMSC for handling incoming SMS, a voice mail system for delivering notifications to the mobile phone that a message is waiting, and an authentication center (AuC) for authenticating, ciphering, and exchanging triplets in GSM networks or authentication vectors in UMTS networks.
Presence server 210 may include a network entity for providing presence service. Presence service is a network service that accepts, stores, and distributes presence information. A presence service may be implemented as a single server or as multiple servers and proxies (e.g., there may be complex patterns of redirection and proxying while retaining logical connectivity to a single presence service). Also presence service may be implemented as direct communication among a presentity and watchers, i.e., a presence server is not required. Presence information is a status indicator that conveys ability and willingness of a potential communication partner to communicate.
An exemplary messaging scenario for 2G core link-based NSID interception and translation to a geo-location proximity descriptor will now be described. 2G handset 200 may send Register or Roam message 212 indicating that 2G handset has registered with the network or is currently roaming. In response, MSC 202 may generate and send a mobility management message to HLR 208. The mobility management message shown in
In step 216, Update_Location message 214 may be intercepted by GLPF 204 and one or more NSIDs may be extracted from Update_location message 214. The one or more NSIDs may be used to determine a geo-location descriptor by consulting NSID-to-geo-location descriptor DB 206. For example, a lookup for an NSID comprising MSC address 1110001 may produce the resulting geo-location proximity descriptor “West Chapel Hill.” The geo-location proximity descriptor may then be included in a presence update message for communication to a presence system. For example, the geo-location proximity descriptor “West Chapel Hill” may be included in PresenceUpdate message 218 and communicated from GLPF 204 to presence server 210. It is appreciated that the NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor translation described above may not interfere with conventional mobility management operation. In other words, Update_Location message 214 may still be delivered unaltered to HLR 208 for performing conventional mobility management functions.
An exemplary messaging scenario for 2G A link-based NSID interception and translation to a geo-location proximity descriptor will now be described. In contrast to the embodiment shown in
An exemplary messaging scenario for 2G NA-bis interface-based NSID interception and translation to a geo-location proximity descriptor will now be described. 2G handset 400 may register with the network or place a call if already registered. In response, mobility management messages, such as a Location_Update_Request message, may be sent to HLR 412. However, the monitoring system shown in
Like mentioned above with respect to
In one embodiment, both “current” and “previous” NSIDs may be extracted and used by GLPF 204 to determine a current geo-location descriptor and a previous geo-location descriptor, respectively. One advantage of using multiple NSIDs which are associated with different points in time includes the ability to compute various position metrics such as a rate of change of the location of the mobile user. This will be described in greater detail with respect to
Group 504 may associate a VLR or SGSN number with a corresponding geo-location descriptor. For example, the geo-location descriptor “West Chapel Hill” may also be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for SGSN number 9191110001.
Group 506 may associate a Location Area ID with a geo-location descriptor. For example, the geo-location descriptor “West Chapel Hill” may be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for Location Area ID 4144.
Group 508 may associate one or more Cell IDs with one or more corresponding geo-location descriptors. For example, the geo-location descriptor “Near Southpoint Mall” may be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for Cell ID 1214.
Group 510 may associate one or more Subscriber IMSIs/TMSIs with one or more Subscriber MSISDNs. For example, MSISDN 9194603232 may be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for Subscriber IMSI 2029551212.
Group 512 may associate one or more BSC and/or BTS addresses with one or more geo-location descriptors. For example, the geo-location descriptor “West Chapel Hill” may be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for BSC address 666. Similarly, the geo-location descriptor “East Chapel Hill” may be determined in response to a lookup in the left hand column for BTS address 777.
Movement descriptors may be based on an examination of multiple NSIDs in order to provide a more accurate description of the movement status of a mobile subscriber. For example, by examining multiple NSIDs corresponding to different points in time a determination may be made as to whether the mobile subscriber is stationary (i.e., no NSID change over time), riding/driving in a motor vehicle (i.e., NSID changing at a rate expected for a car), walking (i.e., NSID changing at a rate that would be expected of an adult walking at a brisk pace . . . 2 mph), riding a bike, etc.).
For example, a first mobility management message associated with a mobile subscriber may be intercepted and a portion of the NSID values may be recorded. Later, a second mobility management message associated with the same mobile subscriber may be intercepted and a portion of the first and second message NSID values may be compared to determine subscriber movement/movement attributes. As shown in NSID-to-movement descriptor DB 206, row 602 may include entries indicating that a mobile user identified by Subscriber ID 9193803814 is motoring (i.e., driving or riding in a motor vehicle). For example, column 602 may indicate that at 13:15:05 on Aug. 8, 2008, the subscriber was located at a cell associated with Cell ID 1214. Because the subscriber may be currently located at a cell associated with Cell ID 1215 at 14:15:05 on Aug. 8, 2008, the rate of change of the user's location (e.g., average speed) may be determined by dividing the difference between these two locations (e.g., 1.5 miles) into the difference between the timestamps at which the location measurements were taken (e.g., 1 hour). The result may include an average speed of 1.5 mph which may be associated with jogging. A similar process may be used to determine various average speeds, which may each be associated with a movement descriptor. It is appreciated that each movement descriptor may be associated with a range of average speeds and that the range may be different for different movement descriptors. Ideally, every speed is uniquely associated with a movement descriptor (i.e., no gaps and no overlaps). However, in close cases where the speed associated with different activities may overlap, such as fast jogging and slow biking, a given speed may be associated with multiple movement descriptors.
Interception module 702 may include a combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware for translating NSIDs into geo-location proximity descriptors and. NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 704 and presence update module 706 may likewise include a combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. In the embodiment shown in
NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 704 may be associated with NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor translation database 206 for determining a geo-location proximity descriptor based on the one or more NSIDs. For example, NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 704 may perform a lookup in NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor translation database 206 for the Cell ID extracted from the Registration message intercepted by interception module 702. The result of the lookup may include the geo-location proximity descriptor, “near downtown.”
Presence update module 706 may be associated with presence server 210 for providing determined geo-location proximity descriptors to a presence system. For example, presence update module 706 may send a presence update message including the geo-location proximity descriptor “near downtown” to presence server 210. The geo-location proximity descriptor may then be displayed to watchers of the mobile subscriber.
According to another group of embodiments, a geo-location proximity function is adapted to intercept/obtain geo-location coordinate data (e.g., GPS coordinates, longitude and latitude, etc.) associated with a mobile subscriber, and to translate the geo-location coordinate data into an associated “fuzzy” geo-location proximity descriptor.
It is expected that such a “precise-to-imprecise” type location information translation will be useful in cases where a mobile subscriber does not want their exact geo-position known/made available to other “watcher” subscribers, but would like provide these watchers with some less precise/“fuzzy” geo-position information. For example, a subscriber may not want others to know his geo-position to within 10 meters, but would instead like some (or all) presence service watchers to be able to see a rough estimate of his geo-position. In other words, this invention allows a presence service subscriber to control the granularity of geo-positioning data that is served-up to other watchers by the presence system. The subject matter described herein provides a means to “fuzzy-up” precise geo-position data before it is served-up to watchers. This provides a way for a network operator/presence service operator to control the “granularity” of geo-position information made available to other presence users/subscribers by taking “precise” geo-position coordinate information associated with a mobile subscriber and translating/mapping the “precise” geo-position information into a less precise proximity descriptor, which is then provided to a presence system. Embodiments for translating location information into one or more geo-location proximity descriptors will now be described in greater detail with respect to
In step 802, a geo-location proximity descriptor is determined based on the one or more NSIDs. For example, SGSN address 9191110001 may be associated with geo-location proximity descriptor “West Chapel Hill” or Cell ID 1214 may be associated with geo-location proximity descriptor “near Southpoint Mall.” As a result, NSIDs, which have no meaning to a watching presentity and which are not provided to a presence system, may be translated into a format usable by a presence system. It is understood that NSIDs may not provide a precise geographic location of a mobile user, but rather may indicate an imprecise geographic area in which the mobile user may be found. This may be referred to herein as a “fuzzy” location and both the one or more NSIDs and the determined geo-location proximity descriptor are fuzzy in this sense. Thus, in step 802, a translation may be performed between a first type of fuzzy data (i.e., one or more NSIDs) and a second type of fuzzy data (geo-location proximity descriptor).
In step 804, the geo-location proximity descriptor is communicated to a presence system. For example, a Presence Update message including the geo-location proximity descriptor determined in step 802 may be communicated to a presence server. Because the geo-location proximity descriptor included in the presence update message is understandable by the presence server, the presence server may indicate that the location of mobile user associated with the mobility management message intercepted in step 800 is “West Chapel Hill” or “near Southpoint Mall.”
Handset 900 may include any suitable GPS-enabled mobile handset capable of determining a geographic location (e.g., coordinates) of the mobile handset. For example, handset 900 may include an iPhone mobile handset manufactured by Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. including a GPS receiver chipset for receiving GPS signals and determining a longitude and latitude of handset 900.
MSC/SIP proxy 902 may include a network entity for receiving location information messages from mobile handset 900. For example, MSC/SIP proxy 902 may include may include any communications device associated with the network switching subsystem that connects to one or more BSCs via the A interface such as MSC 202 described above with respect to
GLPF 204 may include hardware or a combination of hardware and software and/or firmware for translating NSIDs or location information into geo-location proximity descriptors and providing the geo-location proximity descriptors to a presence system. GLPF 204 may be communicatively coupled with or otherwise associated with means for intercepting location update messages transmitted between MSC 202 and HLR 208. NSID-to-geo-location proximity descriptor DB 206 may likewise be co-located with, integrated with, or separately located from GLPF 204. GLPF 204 may be integrated with/co-located with/associated with an STP, SS7-IP Gateway, SS7-SIP Gateway, a SIP Proxy, a SIP signaling router, a softswitch, an MGC, a presence server, etc. The GLPF may also be implemented via a probe-based network monitoring system. In one embodiment, GLPF functionality may be split among one or more network nodes. For example, a message intercept/copy function may be associated with a routing node (e.g., STP, SIP Signaling Router, DIAMETER router, etc.), while the translation/mapping function may be associated with a presence server or HSS node.
Geo-location translation DB 906 may include entries for associating location information (e.g., GPS coordinates) with a corresponding geo-location descriptor. For example, the current position of a mobile subscriber may be expressed as a longitude and latitude. This location information may be used to search DB 906 for a corresponding location descriptor. It is appreciated that multiple coordinates may be associated with the same geo-location descriptor because the mobile subscriber may not wish to broadcast his or her precise location as a presence update. For example, if the mobile user's coordinates indicate that he or she is located on an isolated stretch of a jogging trail downtown, the user may not wish for that information to be disclosed for security reasons. Instead, the user may configure the system to translate all coordinates within several square miles of the jogging trail to the descriptor “downtown” so that watchers have only a general idea of the user's location. Or, if the user wished to be vaguer about his or her location, DB 906 may translate all coordinates corresponding to locations within the USA with the descriptor “USA.”
Location information management entity 908 may include an HLR, home subscriber server (HSS), DIAMETER server, location server, SIP proxy, or any other suitable database or server for managing location information. In the example shown in
Presence server 910 may include a network entity for providing presence service, such as presence server 210 described above with respect to
An exemplary messaging scenario for intercepting and translating location information into a geo-location proximity descriptor and providing the geo-location proximity descriptor to a presence server will now be described below. Initially, handset 900 may transmit GPS information to MSC/SIP proxy 902 in message 912. MSC/SIP proxy 902 may transmit message 914 including the GPS information to location information management entity 908. However, at step 916, GLPF 204 may intercept message 914, extract the GPS information from the message, and translate the GPS information into a geo-location proximity descriptor. For example, GPS-to-location descriptor translation may include consulting geo-location translation DB 906, exemplary entries of which are described with respect to
The geo-location proximity descriptor may then be provided to presence server 910 in presence update message 918 by GLPF 204.
In a manner similar to that described with respect to the previous embodiment, a geo-location proximity function of the present invention is adapted to maintain a geo-position log/history information associated with a mobile subscriber such that mobile subscriber change-of-position/movement characteristics may be calculated over time. In this embodiment, the change-of-position characteristics may be calculated using the more precise geo-position information that is intercepted (e.g., GPS information, longitude, latitude). Once this change-of-position/movement calculation is performed, the resulting movement characteristics are translated/mapped to a movement descriptor. Exemplary movement descriptors may include: walking, jogging, stationary, biking, motoring, etc. Movement descriptor information may then be communicated as presence update information to a presence system.
Referring to the exemplary scenario shown in
Raw GPS information translation data structure 1102 may include raw GPS information provided by one or more GPS satellites such as pseudorandom code 1106, clock signal 1108, ephemeris data 1110, and almanac data 1112. In the example entry shown in
Latitude/longitude translation data structure 1104 may include entries for associating various combinations of latitudes 1114 and longitudes 1116 with geo-location proximity descriptors. For example, latitude 48° 50N and longitude 2° 20E may also correspond to the geo-location proximity descriptor Paris, France.
It is appreciated that numerous instant messaging protocols exist and little interoperability between IM services based on these protocols has been achieved. Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM) defines common semantics and data formats for instant messaging to facilitate the creation of gateways between instant messaging services. CPIM is defined in request for comments (RFC) 3860, instant messaging is defined in RFC 2778, and the CPIM Message Format is defined in RFC 3862, each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Interception module 1300 may include hardware or a combination of hardware and software and/or firmware for translating NSIDs into geo-location proximity descriptors and location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 1302 and presence update module 1304 may likewise include hardware or a combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. In the embodiment shown in
Location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 1302 may be associated with location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor translation database 906 for determining a geo-location proximity descriptor based on the location information. For example, location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor module 1302 may perform a lookup in location information-to-geo-location proximity descriptor translation database 906 for the GPS coordinates extracted from the signaling message intercepted by interception module 1300. The result of the lookup may include the geo-location proximity descriptor, “near downtown.”
Presence update module 1304 may be associated with presence server 910 for providing determined geo-location proximity descriptors to a presence system. For example, presence update module 1304 may send a presence update message including the geo-location proximity descriptor “near downtown” to presence server 910. The geo-location proximity descriptor may then be displayed to watchers of the mobile subscriber.
It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/117,547, filed Nov. 24, 2008; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5341680 | Smart et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5475651 | Bishop et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5774668 | Choquier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122510 | Granberg | Sep 2000 | A |
6125177 | Whittaker | Sep 2000 | A |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6424647 | Ng et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456845 | Drum et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6639981 | Dunn, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704287 | Moharram | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7039040 | Burg | May 2006 | B1 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7146181 | Schaedler et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171216 | Choksi | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7209968 | Secer | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7260207 | Marsico | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7359724 | Torvinen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7701925 | Mason et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7751825 | Gogic | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7840636 | Knauerhase et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844055 | Mukherjee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7870196 | Costa Requena | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7903637 | Moore et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907713 | Khadri | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7924787 | Lee | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933608 | Tejani et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8019335 | Kallio | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8108345 | Cox et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8130931 | Murphy et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8176086 | John et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190884 | Alroy et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204052 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204194 | Hyerle | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234559 | Cox et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8422487 | Mason et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8577004 | Hans et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010024950 | Hakala et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034237 | Garahi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061746 | Jo et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078209 | Peng | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086672 | McDowell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020187781 | Furlong | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193127 | Martschitsch | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065788 | Salomaki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073440 | Mukherjee et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100326 | Grube et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030148779 | Aravamudan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030235180 | Oprescu-Surcobe et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fukimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015569 | Lonnfors et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047303 | Fernandez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062383 | Sylvain | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125790 | Hiller et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133641 | McKinnon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193686 | Blagsvedt et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203923 | Mullen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050157 | Day | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074101 | Moore et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091387 | Abe | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050136952 | Zabawskyj et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143111 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143135 | Brems et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050164682 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228895 | Karunamurthy et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266859 | Tejani et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060068762 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060112177 | Barkley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140189 | Wu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167978 | Ozugur et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060244638 | Lettau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060246880 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070127676 | Khadri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070282911 | Bantukul et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080137832 | Heinze et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090069047 | Russell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089322 | Naaman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090233629 | Jayanthi | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090299985 | Boberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017472 | Benedyk et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100205248 | Mason et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130196601 | Bobrow et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
ZL 200680049126.1 | Dec 2012 | CN |
1 511 267 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 269 764 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2005057709 | Mar 2005 | JP |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0172055 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 03032616 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 2005086966 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005086972 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006118755 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007050591 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2008036645 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 0145342 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711, (Jun. 23, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Jun. 22, 2010). |
Communication purusant to Article 94(3) EPC for European application No. 08153801.9 (May 28, 2010). |
Commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. for “Presence Registration and Routing Node,” filed Apr. 19, 2010, Unpublished. |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Mar. 11, 2010). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Mar. 4, 2010). |
European Search Report for European application No. 08153801.9 (Jan. 27, 2010). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration of PCT/US2009/047391 (Jan. 25, 2010). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,423 (Jan. 6, 2010). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Dec. 24, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Oct. 19, 2009). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,423 (Oct. 15, 2009). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jul. 24, 2009). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,857 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Presence Data From Multiple Presence Information Providers,” filed Jun. 15, 2009, Unpublished. |
Ex parte Quayle for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (May 7, 2009). |
Communication regarding the expiry of the time limit within which notice of opposition may be filed for European Application No. 01920654.9 dated May 7, 2009. |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,423 (Apr. 29, 2009). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Mar. 16, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Jan. 21, 2009). |
Notice of Abandonment for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Nov. 12, 2008). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,423 (Jul. 25, 2008). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Jun. 26, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/41451 (Jul. 7, 2008). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Apr. 16, 2008). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 4, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/13404 (Oct. 5, 2007). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Sep. 20, 2007). |
Restriction/Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jun. 14, 2007). |
Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC corresponding to European application No. 01 920 654.9 dated May 2, 2007. |
Notice of Panel Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 2, 2007). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,924 (Oct. 3, 2006). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Aug. 25, 2006). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US05/08258 (Aug. 16, 2006). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US05/08307 (Mar. 13, 2006). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,924 (Feb. 23, 2006). |
Wideberg et al., “Deriving Traffic Data From a Cellular Network,” World Congress on Intelligent Transport System and Services. World Congress on Intelligent Transport System and Services (13). No. 13. Londres, UK. Ertico. (2006). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Dec. 28, 2005). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jun. 2, 2005). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US05/08307 (Mar. 11, 2005). |
Klyne, et al., “Common Presence and Instant Messaging (CPIM): Message,” Network Working Group, RFC 3862, p. 1-23 (Aug. 2004). |
Peterson, J., “Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM),” Network Working Group, RFC 3860 (Aug. 2004). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (May 19, 2004). |
Restriction/Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jan. 9, 2004). |
Campbell et al., “SIP Instant Message Sessions,” p. 1 (Jun. 30, 2003). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Apr. 28, 2003). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 (Jan. 30, 2003). |
Campbell et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Instant Messaging,” pp. 1-15 (Dec. 2002). |
Rosenberg et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” Network Working Group, FRC 3261 (Jun. 2002). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and Systems Aspects; Network Architecture (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 23.002, V5.7.0, p. 1-50, (Jun. 2002). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 09/627,253 for “Presence Registration and Routing Node,” filed Jul. 28, 2000, Unpublished. |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Froup, p. 1-17, (Mar. 10, 2000). |
Aggarwal et al., “Transport Protocol for Presence Information/Instant Messaging,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pitp-mitp-01, Network Working Group, p. 1-21, (Mar. 9, 2000). |
Day et al., “A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging,” Request for Comments: 2778, Network Working Group, p. 1-17, (Feb. 2000). |
Day et al., “Instant Messaging/Presence Protocol Requirements,” Request for Comments: 2779, Network Working Group, p. 1-26, (Feb. 2000). |
Stracke, J., “Message Information Data Format,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-midf-01.txt, Network Working Group, p. 1-4, (Jan. 19, 2000). |
Tekelec, “IP7 Secure Gateway Release 1.0”, Tekelec Release Documentation, 910-2046-01 Revision A (Nov. 1999). |
Handley et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” Request for Comments: 2543, Network Working Group, p. 1-111, (Mar. 1999). |
Saraswat et al., “The Presence Protocol,” Internet-Draft, draft-saraswat-presenceprotocol-00.txt, p. 1-15 (Feb. 26, 1999). |
Rosenberg et al., “SIP for Presence,” IETF, draft-rosenberg-sip-pip-00.txt, p. 1-22 (Nov. 13, 1998). |
Handley et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” Request for Comments: 2327, Network Working Group, p. 1-42, (Apr. 1998). |
Tekelec, “Feature Guide Eagle STP,” P/N 910-1225-01 Revision B (Jan. 1998). |
Tekelec, “Feature Guide LNP LSMS,” P/N 910-1598-01 Revision A (Jan. 1998). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Apr. 14, 2011). |
Chinese Offical Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680049126.1 (Feb. 24, 2011). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Feb. 16, 2011). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Mar. 1, 2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Mar. 1, 2011). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Dec. 21, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Dec. 20, 2010). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/077,711 (Dec. 3, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/586,423 (Oct. 6, 2010). |
European Search Report for European application No. 06826548.7 (Sep. 3, 2010). |
Notice of Granting Patent Right for Invention for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680049126.1 (Aug. 6, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Apr. 25, 2012). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Application No. 08 153 801.9 (Apr. 23, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Feb. 22, 2012). |
Noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC for European Application No. 09763799.5 (Feb. 7, 2012). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Jan. 9, 2012). |
Second Office Action of Chinese Patent Application No. 200680049126.1 (Dec. 6, 2011). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Nov. 9, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/120,324 (Nov. 1, 2011). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 09763799.5 (Oct. 14, 2011). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European application No. 05725442.7 (Aug. 16, 2011). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Jun. 28, 2011). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,857 (Aug. 30, 2012). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Aug. 23, 2012). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 06 826 548.7 (Feb. 20, 2014). |
Notice of Grant for Indian Patent Application No. 2580/CHENP/2008 (Dec. 3, 2013). |
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 2580/CHENP/2008 (Oct. 31, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,857 (Oct. 21, 2013). |
First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 2580/CHENP/2008 (Nov. 29, 2012). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/762,908 (Dec. 18, 2012). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,857 (May 17, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100137002 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61117547 | Nov 2008 | US |