The subject matter described herein relates to discovering packet data unit (PDU) session bindings More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing optimized BSF PDU session binding discovery responses.
In telecommunications networks, a service endpoint is an address on a network node that uniquely identifies an entity that provides service to service consumers. The service endpoint can include an Internet protocol (IP) address or a combination of IP address and transport layer port number, which is also referred to as an IP endpoint.
In 5G telecommunications networks, the network node that provides service is referred to as a producer network function (NF). A network node that consumes services is referred to as a consumer NF. A network function can be both a producer NF and a consumer NF depending on whether it is consuming or providing service.
A given producer NF may have many service endpoints. Producer NFs register with a network function repository function (NRF). The NRF maintains an NF profile of available NF instances and their supported services. Consumer NFs can subscribe to receive information about producer NF instances that have registered with the NRF.
In addition to consumer NFs, another type of network node that can subscribe to receive information about NF service instances is a service communications proxy (SCP). The SCP subscribes with the NRF and obtains reachability and service profile information regarding producer NF service instances. Consumer NFs connect to the service communications proxy, and the service communications proxy load balances traffic among producer NF service instances that provide the required service or directly routes the traffic to the destined producer NF.
One problem with the existing 3GPP service architecture is PDU session binding information maintained in a PDU session binding database at a binding support function (BSF) may not be updated when the status of a policy control function (PCF) associated with the PDU session binding changes. For example, after a user equipment (UE) device registers with the network, the UE creates a PDU session in order to exchange data with the network. As part of the PDU session creation process, a policy control function (PCF) is assigned to the session to generate policy rules for the session to control quality of service and charging for the session. The PCF assigned to the session registers with a binding support function (BSF), and the BSF creates a binding record for the session in its database. NF service consumers seeking to discover the PDU session binding for a UE do so by querying the BSF using a discovery API provided by the BSF.
One problem that can occur when the NF service consumers query the BSF is that the PDU session binding records maintained by the BSF may not reflect the current operational status of the PCFs. For example, after a binding record is created, the operational status of a PCF associated with the binding record may change, e.g., due to the PCF going out of service. A BSF consumer NF may seek to discover a PDU session binding in order to provide service to a UE. However, if the PDU session binding information does not reflect the current operational status of the PCF, the NF may receive PDU session binding information for a PCF that is out of service. The consumer NF may then seek to contact the non-operational PCF, fail to receive a response, and then initiate discovery with a network function (NF) repository function (NRF) to obtain alternate PCF session binding information for the UE. Requiring consumer NFs to contact the BSF, contact the non-operational PCF, contact the NRF, and then contact the alternate PCF assigned to a PDU session can result in delays in providing of services to UEs.
In light of these and other challenges, there exists a need for improved, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media for providing optimized BSF PDU session binding discovery responses.
A method for providing optimized binding support function (BSF) packet data unit (PDU) session binding discovery responses is performed at a BSF including at least one processor. The method includes maintaining a database of PDU session binding records. The method further includes subscribing with a network function (NF) repository function (NRF) to receive notification of changes to NF profiles of PCF instances or NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The method further includes obtaining, from the NRF, lists of NF profiles for the PCF instances in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The method further includes receiving, from the NRF and in response to the subscription, at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The method further includes receiving a PDU session binding discovery request from a consumer NF. The method further includes identifying, in the database of PDU session binding records and based on at least one query parameter in the PDU session binding discovery request, a matching PDU session binding record matching. The method further includes generating, using the matching PDU session binding record, one of the lists of NF profiles received from the NRF, and the at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles, a PDU session binding discovery response. The method further includes transmitting the PDU session binding response to the consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, obtaining the lists of NF profiles includes transmitting NRF discovery requests to the NRF containing attributes identifying the PCF instances or NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, receiving the PDU session binding discovery request includes receiving a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) message from a 5G consumer network function (NF) that utilizes an N5 interface to contact a PCF bound to a session.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the 5G consumer NF comprises one of an application function (AF), a network exposure function (NEF), a policy control function (PCF) and a network data analytics function (NWDAF).
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, receiving the PDU session binding request includes receiving a Diameter message from a Diameter node that uses an Rx interface to contact a PCF bound to a session.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the node that uses the Diameter node that uses the Rx interface comprises a Diameter relay agent (DRA).
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, generating the PDU session binding response includes selecting an alternate NF profile to an NF profile for a PCF instance identified in the matching PDU session binding record and including the alternate NF profile in the PDU session binding discovery response.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, selecting the alternate NF profile includes filtering the one list of NF profiles based on attributes included in the matching PDU session binding record and selecting the alternate NF profile from the filtered list.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, selecting the alternate NF profile includes filtering the one list of NF profiles based on operator-specified parameters and selecting the alternate NF profile from the filtered list.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the method for providing optimized BSF PDU session binding discovery responses includes updating the matching PDU session binding record based on attributes of the alternate NF profile.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, A system for providing optimized binding support function (BSF) packet data unit (PDU) session binding discovery response is provided. The system includes a BSF including at least one processor and a memory. The system further includes a PDU session binding database located in the memory and including PDU session binding records. The system further includes a PCF instance tracker implemented by the at least one processor for subscribing with a network function (NF) repository function (NRF) to receive notification of changes to NF profiles of PCF instances or NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records, obtaining, from the NRF, lists of NF profiles for the PCF instances in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records, receiving, from the NRF and in response to the subscription, at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records, receiving a PDU session binding discovery request from a consumer NF, and identifying, in the database of PDU session binding records and based on at least one query parameter in the PDU session binding discovery request, a matching PDU session binding record matching, generating, using the matching PDU session binding record, one of the lists of NF profiles received from the NRF, and the at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles, a PDU session binding discovery response, and transmitting the PDU session binding response to the consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the PCF instance tracker is configured to obtain the lists of NF profiles by transmitting NRF discovery requests to the NRF containing attributes identifying the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, he PCF instance tracker is configured to generate the PDU session binding response by selecting an alternate NF profile to an NF profile for a PCF instance identified in the matching PDU session binding record and including the alternate NF profile in the PDU session binding discovery response.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the PCF instance tracker is configured to select the alternate NF profile by filtering the one list of NF profiles based on at least one attributes included in the matching PDU session binding record and operator-specified parameters and selecting the alternate NF profile from the filtered list.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the PCF instance tracker is configured to update the matching PDU session binding record based on attributes of the alternate NF profile.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps is provided. The steps are performed at a binding support function (BSF) including at least one processor. The steps include maintaining a database of packet data unit (PDU) session binding record. The steps further include subscribing with a network function (NF) repository function (NRF) to receive notification of changes to NF profiles of PCF instances or NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The steps further include obtaining, from the NRF, lists of NF profiles for the PCF instances in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The steps further include receiving, from the NRF and in response to the subscription, at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles in the NF sets identified in the PDU session binding records. The steps further include receiving a PDU session binding discovery request from a consumer NF. The steps further include identifying, in the database of PDU session binding records and based on at least one query parameter in the PDU session binding discovery request, a matching PDU session binding record matching. The steps further include generating, using the matching PDU session binding record, one of the lists of NF profiles received from the NRF, and the at least one notification of changes in at least some of the NF profiles, a PDU session binding discovery response. The steps further include transmitting the PDU session binding response to the consumer NF.
The subject matter described herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. As such, the terms “function” “node” or “module” as used herein refer to hardware, which may also include software and/or firmware components, for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
The subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
The subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for providing optimized BSF PDU session binding discovery responses.
NRF 100 is a repository for NF profiles. In order to communicate with a producer NF, a consumer NF or an SCP must obtain the NF profile from NRF 100. The NF profile is a JSON data structure defined in 3GPP TS 29.510 that stores information about NF service instances. The NF profile definition includes at least one of an FQDN, an IP version 4 address or an IP version 6 address. However, there is no requirement that the NF profile include individual IP addresses or IP endpoints associated with a producer NF service endpoint located on the producer NF service instance.
In
A network slice selection function (NSSF) 116 provides network slicing services for devices seeking to access specific network capabilities and characteristics associated with a network slice. A network exposure function (NEF) 118 provides application programming interfaces (APIs) for application functions seeking to obtain information about Internet of things (IoT) devices and other UEs attached to the network. NEF 118 performs similar functions to the service capability exposure function (SCEF) in 4G networks.
A radio access network (RAN) 120 connects UE 114 to the network via a wireless link. Radio access network 120 may be accessed using a g-Node B (gNB) (not shown in
In general, the Nbsf_Management service is used for the BSF to provide PDU session binding functionality, which ensures that an AF request for a PDU session reaches the PCF holding the PDU session information. The Nbsf_Management service allows consumers to register, update, and remove binding information. The Nbsf_Management service also allows consumers to retrieve the binding information.
In
PCF 102 registers binding information in the BSF for a UE when an IPv4 address and/or an IPv6 prefix is allocated, or a MAC address is used for the PDU session. PCF 102 also updates binding information with BFS 200 when UE address information is changed for a PDU session. PCF 102 removes binding information in BSF 200 when an IPv4 address and/or an IPv6 prefix is released or a MAC address is not used for the PDU session.
NEF 118 provides a means for AF 106 to securely interact with the policy framework for policy control to a 3GPP network. During the procedure, any NEF 118 needs to discover the selected PCF using the Nbsf_Management_Discovery service operation.
AF 106 discovers the PCF using the Nbsf_Management_Discovery service operation when AF 106 is allowed to interact directly with the policy framework for policy control. NWDAF 202 discovers a selected PCF using the Nbsf_Management_Discovery service.
Table 1 shown below illustrates the operation of the Nbsf Management service.
In Table 1, the Nbsf_management services offered by the BSF include Nbsf_Management_Register service, Nbsf_Management_Deregister service, Nbsf_Management_Discovery service, and Nbsf_Management_Update service. Nbsf_Management_Register and Nbsf Management_Deregister services are services used by PCFs to register and deregister session bindings for a UE. The Nbsf_Management_Update service is used by the PCF to update a session binding for a UE when a UE address for a PDU session changes. the Nbsf_Management_Discovery service allows NF service consumers, such as NEFs, AFs, and NWDAFs, discover PDU session binding information for a UE. It is the Nbsf_Management_Discovery service that the subject matter described herein enhances by subscribing to receive updated PCF registration status information for PCFs that are bound to PDU sessions and responding to PDU session binding discovery requests with the NF profiles of reachable PCF instances.
In step 2 of
Table 2 shown below illustrates exemplary PCF binding data that can be registered by a PCF with BSF 200.
In Table 2, in the attribute name column, the pcfFqdn, pcflpEndPoints, pcfDiamHost, PcfDiamRealm, PcfSmlpEndPoints, the pcfld, pcfSetId, and bindLevel attributes are the PCF identifying attributes set by the PCF that creates or registers the binding record in the BSF. For a discovery request from a consumer NF that uses the N5 interface for contacting the PCF bound to a session, the pcfFqdn and pcflpEndpoints attributes will be used by the consumer NF on the N5 interface to contact the PCF. For a discovery request from a DRA/AF that uses the Rx interface for contacting the PCF bound to a session, the PcfDiamHost and PcfDiamRealm attributes will be used by the DRA/AF to contact the PCF. In case another PCF tries to register binding of the same subscriber+dnn+snssai, pcfSmFqdn and pcfSmlpEndpoints will be used by the alternate PCF. As stated above, the PCF as the NF service consumer may provide the PCF set ID within the pcfSetId attribute and bindLevel attribute set to NF SET or provide the PCF set ID within the pcfSetId attribute, the PCF instance ID within the pcfld attribute, and the bindLevel attribute set to NF_INSTANCE. The significance of the different settings of these attributes with regarding to providing optimized PDU session binding discovery responses will be explained in detail below with regard to
PCF 102 includes a Diameter gateway 510 that performs processing of received Diameter messages and a Diameter connector 512 that handles diameter connections. PCF 102 also includes a policy service 514 that makes policy decisions for PDU sessions, a policy authorization service 516 that creates policies, a session management service 518 that creates session bindings. PCF 102 interfaces with session management function 108 to inform session management function 108 of policy decisions.
In the message flow illustrated in
After receiving the PDU session binding information, AF/DRA 500 initiates contact on the Rx interface with the PCF assigned to the session. In line 6 of the message flow diagram, Diameter gateway 504 sends an Rx-AAR-I proxy message to Diameter gateway 510 of PCF 102. In line 7, Diameter gateway 510 sends the Rx-AAR-I proxy message to Diameter connector 512. In line 8, Diameter connector 512 sends a an Npcf_Policy_Authorization_Create message to PA service 516. In line 9, PA service 516 sends a session binding request to session management service 518. In line 10, session service 518 sends a session binding reply to PA service 516. In line 11, PA service 516 sends a create reply message to Diameter connector 512. In line 12 Diameter connector 512 sends an Rx-AAA-I message to Diameter gateway 510. In line 13, Diameter gateway 510 sends the Rx-AAA-I message to Diameter gateway 504. In line 14, Diameter gateway 504 sends the Rx-AAA-I message to AF/DRA 500.
After sending the session binding reply in line 10, SM service 518 sends a policy evaluate message to policy service 514. Policy service 514 makes a decision based on application of a policy and in line 16 sends a policy decision to SM service 518. SM service 518 applies the policy decision and in line 17 sends a policy association notification rules to SMF 108.
If the operational status of a PCF changes after a binding record is created in the BSF, many problems and inefficiencies can occur. For example, if a PCF service instance goes offline during a network outage or due to a service issue, the binding maintained by the BSF is not up to date, and an NRF discovery procedure may be required to be rerun to find an alternate PCF instance. Other problems can occur when SM, PA, and Diameter entities used to contact a PCF instance become unreachable. SMs/PA/Diameter entities published in binding information can also be changed when a new IP address, FQDN, or other identity is assigned to the PCF by the network operator. These changes make entities listed in the BSF's binding table inaccessible and, without the subject matter described herein, a manual procedure is required to update BSF binding records to correct these discrepancies.
In step 3, upon receiving the discovery response, AF/NEF/PCF 106, 118, or 102 attempts to contact PCF instance 102N identified in the binding response. However, PCF 102N is not available. Accordingly, upon failing to receive a response, AF/NEF/PCF 106, 118 or 102 initiates the NF discovery procedure with NRF 100 to identify a new PCF instance. In step 5, consumer NF 106, 118, or 102 performs N5 or Rx message signaling with the alternate PCF instance 1021.
One problem caused by the unavailability of a PCF instance in the BSF binding database is a delay in processing service requests from consumer NFs. As described above, upon a failed attempt to reach the original PCF, the consumer NF initiates the NRF discovery procedure and reroutes the request to the new PCF upon receiving the discovery response from the NRF. The time required to perform discovery with the BSF, the failed attempt to contact the PCF, and to perform discovery with the NRF result in delayed service provided to the consumer NF.
Another problem associated with outdated binding information maintained by the BSF is a discovery storm at the NRF. When a PCF instance fails, all consumers of binding records with the failed PCF instance as the serving PCF instance will initiate discovery with the NRF to find the identity of an alternate PCF serving the UE. This could lead to the NRF becoming overwhelmed due to the storm of discovery messages at the NRF.
Other challenges associated with discovery include the fact that non-5G nodes, such as a Diameter relay agent (DRA) may not be able to perform 5G discovery with the NRF. Accordingly, there is no alternate route for the DRA to try when the binding information received from the BSF is incorrect or not up to date. Similarly, an AF may lack the ability to run NRF discovery to select an alternate PCF. This also limits the possibility for the AF to be served by an alternate PCF.
In order to avoid these difficulties, a BSF may subscribe with an NRF to keep track of registered PCF instances for corresponding PCF sets in the PDU session binding database maintained by the BSF. The BSF, upon processing of a bsf_discovery request, if a binding record is present in the BSF database that contains bindlevel information, may run additional logic set forth below in Table 3 to verify that reachable endpoints are in the binding discovery response.
The operation of the BSF in the various scenarios illustrated in Table 3 will be described in detail below.
Referring to the message flow in
After the message flow in
If the bind level is set to NF_instance, this indicates that the binding level for the record is and individual PCF instance, and control proceeds to step 908 where BSF 200 checks the NRF reported status for the PCF profile with the same pcfld indicates that the corresponding PCF is still registered with the NRF. If the PCF is still registered, control proceeds to step 910 where BSF 200 determines whether the parameters stored for the PCF instance in the binding record match the corresponding details in the NF profile registered for the PCF instance with the NRF. If the parameters match, control proceeds to step 912 where BSF 200 sends a binding discover response with the PCF instance profile of the PCF matching the query parameters (such as UE address) in the binding discovery request.
Returning to step 910, if pcfDiamHost, pcfDiam Realm, pcfSmlpEndPoints, or pcfSmFqdn stored for the PCF instance in the binding record does not match the corresponding details in the NF profile registered for the PCF instance with the NRF, then the parameters in discovery response need to be updated with the parameters for the matching PCF profile registered with the NRF. Accordingly, control proceeds to step 922 where the mismatching attributes are updated in the binding response and the response is sent to the consumer NF.
Returning to step 902, if there is no binding data and/or the solution is not enabled, default behavior is executed and control proceeds to step 912 where the binding discovery response is sent. If there is no binding data, the binding discovery response will indicate that there is no binding data stored with the BSF matching the query parameters in the binding discovery request.
Returning to step 904, if the bind level attribute is not set in the binding discovery request, the BSF cannot verify PCF instance details from binding data, with registered PCF profiles at NRF. Thus, control proceeds to step 912, where the binding discovery response with PCF information as stored in binding database is sent.
Returning to step 906, if the bind level in the binding data is not set to NF_Instance, control proceeds to step 914, where is determined whether the bind level is set to NF_Set. If the bind level is set to NF_Set, control proceeds to step 916 where the BSF 200 determines whether the pcfFqdn and pcflpEndPoints parameters in the binding record match those for any PCF profile registered with the NRF (received by the BSF in the discovery response and as modified by any status notifications received from the BSF) for the pcfSetId in the binding record. If the parameters match those for any PCF profile registered with the NRF, control proceeds to step 918 where BSF 200 determines whether the PCF pcfDiamHost, pcfDiamRealm, pcfSmFqdn, pcfSmlpEndpoints parameters match those for the corresponding PCF profile identified as matching in step 916. If the parameters in step 918 match, this indicates that the PCF profile registered with the NRF matches the details in the binding record, and, control proceeds to step 912 where the binding discovery response with the PCF profile is sent to the consumer NF.
Returning to step 908, if the bind level is set to NF_Instance and the NRF reported status information for the PCF profile matching the pcfld and pcfSetId is no longer registered with the NRF, the BSF cannot provide the PDU session binding information to the service consumer. In this case, the BSF may respond to the service consumer indicating that no binding information is available and perform actions to clean up or delete the corresponding binding record. Without the solution described herein, the BSF would have responded to the discovery request with a PCF profile of a PCF that is no longer registered with the NRF. This would result in the inefficiencies described above where the service consumer attempts to contact the PCF, is unsuccessful, and contacts the NRF to obtain updated binding information for the PDU session.
Returning to step 914, if the bindLevel is not set to NF_Set or NF_Instance, the bindLevel is unknown because these are the only two allowed bindLevels allowed by the 3GPP specifications. Accordingly, control proceeds to step 912 where BSF 200 sends a binding discovery response to the consumer NF indicating with PCF and binding information as stored in binding database is sent
Returning to step 916, if the pcfFqdn and pcflpEndpoints in the binding record matching the query parameters do not match any of the PCF profiles registered with the NRF, control proceeds to step 920 where BSF 200 selects an alternate PCF profile and sends a discovery response to the consumer NF with the alternate PCF profile. Details of the steps performed by BSF 200 to select the alternate PCF profile are described below with regard to
Returning to step 918, if the pcfFqdn and pcflpEndpoints in the binding record matching the query parameters match one of the PCF profiles registered but the pcfDiam Host, pcfDiamRealm, pcfSmlpEndPoints, or pcfSmFqdn does not match the corresponding PCF profile, then the parameters in discovery response need to be updated with the parameters for the matching PCF profile registered with the NRF. Accordingly, control proceeds to step 922 where the mismatching attributes are updated in the binding response and the response is sent to the consumer NF.
After step 1000 or 1003, control then proceeds to step 1004 where BSF 200 determines whether the binding record has pcfFqdn or pcflpEndPoints attributes. If the binding record includes these attributes, control proceeds to step 1006 where BSF 200 filters the profiles that have PA service registered. If the binding record does not include the pcfFqdn or pcflpEndPoints attributes, step 1006 is bypassed.
After step 1004 or 1006, control proceeds to step 1008, where BSF 200 determines whether the binding record has pcfDiamHost and pcfDiamRealm attributes. If the binding record has pcfDiam Host and pcfDiam Realm attributes, control proceeds to step 1009 where BSF 200 filters profiles that have Diameter attributes published to the NRF in pcfinfo. If the binding record does not have pcfDiamHost and pcfDiam Realm attributes, step 1009 is bypassed.
After the filtering in step 1009 or if the binding record does not have the pcfDiamHost and pcfDiamRealm attributes in step 1008, control then proceeds to step 1010 where BSF 200 determines whether the list, after the filtering, has more than one profile. If the filtered list includes more than one profile, control proceeds to step 1011 where BSF 200 filters the profile based on operator configuration to select profiles to select a profile that has a matching SM service version. This is an optional step. It is not required when the operator network has more than one PCF instance in the same PCF set with the same major version. Control then proceeds to step 1012 where BSF 200 filters the profile based on operator configuration to select profiles that have the specific api version, load, capacity, location, etc. that best satisfies the requirements of the network operator to be selected as an alternate PCF profile for the PCF whose status has changed since the binding record was created. If in step 1010, the BSF determines that the list does not include more than one profile, steps 1011 and 1012 are bypassed.
After the filtering in step 1012 or if more than 1 profile was not found in step 1010, control proceeds to step 1014 where BSF 200 determines whether there is at least one profile in the filtered list. If BSF 200 determines that there is at least one profile in the filtered list, control proceeds to step 1016 where BSF 200 updates the binding discovery response to be sent to the consumer NF to match the parameters of the alternate PCF profile. BSF 200 may optionally update the binding record in the PDU session binding database to include the updated information for the alternate PCF. In step 1018, BSF 200 sends the discovery response with the alternate PCF binding information to the consumer NF.
If BSF 200 determines in step 1014 that there are no remaining profiles in the list, this means that BSF 200 cannot find an alternate PCF profile to include in the binding discovery response. Accordingly, control proceeds to step 1018 where the binding discovery response is sent with the PCF profile from the PDU session binding record.
Thus, the solution described herein allows BSF to actively monitor PCF status information by subscribing to and receiving updates from an NRF. If a PCF whose binding information is maintained at the BSF fails, goes out of service, or has changed attributes in its NF profile, the BSF will upon receiving a discovery request, update the information to be provided to the consumer NF in a binding discovery response and provide the updated binding information to the requesting consumer NF. The BSF may optionally update the binding information for the UE in the PDU session binding database. Such a solution reduces additional messaging from consumer NFs, such as AFs, NEFs, and PCFs towards the NRF. It provides efficient network utilization but avoids network overload. Higher throughput and lower latency at the AF, NEF, and PCF can also be achieved by avoiding unnecessary NRF discovery.
The subject matter described herein is optional and backward compatible. It does not require any parameter or trigger from any other NF and thus control and scope of the feature can be implemented at the BSF. The feature can be selectively enabled for specific consumers by network operators. Information about a consumer seeking force to perform selective enablement can provide selection details such as an instance ID or PLMN ID in authorization token. Alternatively, for HTTPS connections, the transport layer security (TLS) certificate can be used to find the identity of the consumer. Similarly, Vendor specific attributes in the discovery request can also be used to identify the consumer.
The disclosure of each of the following references is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1872857 | Wesson et al. | Apr 1931 | A |
5878347 | Joensuu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6836477 | West, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6928383 | Fukushima et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6967956 | Tinsley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7292592 | Rune | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310307 | Das et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7319857 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7551926 | Rune | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7738488 | Marsico et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7792981 | Taylor | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814015 | Benedyk et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7844745 | Darbyshire et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7916685 | Schaedler et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7996541 | Marathe et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015293 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8125999 | Yasrebi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8532110 | McCann et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547908 | Marsico | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8615237 | Baniel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8737304 | Karuturi et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8825060 | McCann et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831076 | Yen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8903357 | Cutler | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918469 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942747 | Marsico | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9059948 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9148524 | Deo | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9288169 | Schaedler et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9319378 | McCann | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9398470 | Roeland et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9668134 | McCann | May 2017 | B2 |
9668135 | McCann | May 2017 | B2 |
9918229 | McCann | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9923984 | McCann et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9930528 | McCann | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10084755 | McCann | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10554661 | McCann | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10951519 | Renzullo et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20010028636 | Skog et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194378 | Foti | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196775 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030040280 | Koskelainen | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030131151 | Roach et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040098612 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103157 | Requena et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040152469 | Yla-Outinen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205212 | Huotari et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223489 | Rotsten et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225878 | Costa-Requena et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242227 | Huotari et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246965 | Westman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260816 | Skog et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007984 | Shaheen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009520 | Herrero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050058125 | Mutikainen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078642 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094594 | Roh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120198 | Bajko et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124341 | Myllymaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136926 | Tammi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050155036 | Tiainen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159156 | Bajko et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050227675 | Lim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235000 | Keil | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060002308 | Na et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030320 | Tammi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045249 | Li et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068762 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068816 | Pelaez et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077926 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078119 | Jee et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161512 | Schaedler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172730 | Matsuda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060221972 | Bhargava et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259759 | Maino et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274744 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070121596 | Kurapati et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136590 | Nah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153995 | Fang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189215 | Wu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070242637 | Dynarski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297419 | Askerup et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002652 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039104 | Gu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080256251 | Huotari et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090080440 | Balyan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089435 | Terrill et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090129271 | Ramankutty et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156213 | Spinelli et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177796 | Falk et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196231 | Giaretta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090196290 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090022131 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232011 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264097 | Cai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265467 | Peles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305684 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313379 | Rydnell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100268814 | Cross et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290392 | Rasanen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291923 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311392 | Stenfelt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331023 | Cai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040845 | Cai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110116378 | Ramankutty et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116382 | McCann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110154454 | Frelechoux | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158090 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110165901 | Baniel et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110199906 | Kanode et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110200053 | Kanode et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202612 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202614 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202676 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211574 | Li et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225113 | Mann | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225280 | Delsesto et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225281 | Riley et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225306 | Delsesto et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282904 | Schaedler et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302244 | McCann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314178 | Kanode et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120089993 | Alonso Alarcon et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096177 | Rasanen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124220 | Zhou et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120129488 | Patterson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155389 | McNamee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155470 | McNamee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177028 | Mo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201203 | Miyagawa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120202550 | Marsico | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207015 | Marsico | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224524 | Marsico | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120224531 | Karuturi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120225679 | McCann et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226758 | Sprague et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120226814 | Stucker | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120236871 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239771 | Rasanen | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265888 | Roeland et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311064 | Deo | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130171990 | McCann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130246639 | Nedbal et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130279497 | Verma et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304843 | Chow et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311672 | Chastain | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140092899 | Krishna et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164633 | Bi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140207941 | McCann | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140258423 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140321278 | Cafarelli et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140342690 | Tanouchev et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355523 | Congdon et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150036486 | McMurry et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150117420 | Raman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150149656 | McMurry et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160373348 | Renzullo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170048190 | McCann | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048202 | McCann | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048703 | McCann | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048704 | McCann | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170126522 | McCann et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170141959 | Gilmore | May 2017 | A1 |
20170238178 | McCann | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170238179 | McCann | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190053308 | Castellanos Zamora | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190313468 | Talebi Fard | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190357301 | Li | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190394833 | Talebi Fard | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20210037375 | Cakulev | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210083965 | Taft | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210227625 | Wang | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210250411 | Cakulev | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1809072 | Jul 2006 | CN |
101001440 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101079742 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101247321 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101277541 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101483826 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101867873 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101945047 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102239481 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102656845 | Sep 2012 | CN |
ZL201080065174.6 | Jun 2015 | CN |
100037 | Jul 2016 | CN |
103477661 | Oct 2016 | CN |
ZL201280019607.3 | Dec 2016 | CN |
ZL201280013938.6 | Mar 2017 | CN |
ZL201280018298.8 | Mar 2017 | CN |
ZL201280018288.4 | Apr 2017 | CN |
ZL201480005758.2 | Jul 2019 | CN |
1 357 720 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 630 999 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 107 725 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2 234 422 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 242 205 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2 220 841 | Sep 2011 | EP |
1 846 832 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2 466 828 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2 522 103 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2 577 930 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2 681 940 | May 2016 | EP |
2 681 939 | Sep 2016 | EP |
2 522 102 | Nov 2016 | EP |
2 681 938 | Dec 2016 | EP |
2 671 396 | Jul 2019 | EP |
2 681 937 | Sep 2019 | EP |
2 949 109 | Oct 2019 | EP |
319441 | Aug 2019 | IN |
360160 | Mar 2021 | IN |
H10-98470 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H11-224219 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2004-242326 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2006-513631 | Apr 2006 | JP |
4041038 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2009-537102 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010-527520 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010-0278884 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2013-527999 | Jul 2013 | JP |
5732550 | Jun 2015 | JP |
5758508 | Aug 2015 | JP |
5759064 | Aug 2015 | JP |
5938052 | Jun 2016 | JP |
5950943 | Jul 2016 | JP |
6091657 | Feb 2017 | JP |
WO 2004064442 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2006066149 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2009058067 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009070179 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009086759 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2010139360 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011082035 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011082090 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011082895 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011156274 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012106710 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118959 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118963 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118967 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012119147 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012154674 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2014116464 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Binding Support Management Service; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.521, V16.5.0, pp. 1-34 (Sep. 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V16.5.0, pp. 1-208 (Sep. 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Procedures for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.502, V16.6.0, pp. 1-597 (Sep. 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control framework for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.503, V16.6.0, pp. 1-118 (Sep. 2020). |
“3GPP TSG-CT WG3 Meeting #109-e,” 29.521 CR 0068, Rev 1, Current Version 16.3.0, pp. 1-13 (Apr. 2020). |
“Oracle Communications Binding Support Function Cloud Native User's Guide Release 1.0,” Oracle Communications, pp. 1-2 (2019). |
Hearing Notice for Indian Patent Application Serial No. 6878/CHENP/2013 (Jan. 15, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Nov. 10, 2020). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief, Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary, and AFCP 2.0 Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Aug. 11, 2020). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Apr. 29, 2020). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Feb. 3, 2020). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Nov. 4, 2019). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application Serial No. 3931/CHENP/2015 (dated Oct. 21, 2019). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 14702996.1 (dated Sep. 19, 2019). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Sep. 13, 2019). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 12751783.7 (dated Aug. 29, 2019). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 12741984.4 (dated Jun. 27, 2019). |
Letter Regarding Notification to Grant of Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201480005758.2 (dated Jun. 6, 2019). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated May 16, 2019). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC of Intention to Grant for European Patent Application Serial No. 14 702 996.1 (dated May 10, 2019). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 12 751 783.7 (dated Apr. 24, 2019). |
Office Action for Indian Patent Application Serial No. 8612/CHENP/2013 (dated Apr. 23, 2019). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Apr. 17, 2019). |
Hearing Notice for Indian Patent Application Serial No. 6547/CHENP/2012 (Mar. 25, 2019). |
Notification of the Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201480005758.2 (dated Mar. 4, 2019). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 12 741 984.4 (dated Feb. 12, 2019). |
Advisory Action, Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary, and AFCP 2.0 Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Feb. 1, 2019). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Jan. 28, 2019). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application Serial No. 14 702 996.1 (dated Nov. 29, 2018). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Nov. 2, 2018). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 6878/CHENP/2013 (dated Sep. 27, 2018). |
Notification of the Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480005758.2 (dated Sep. 27, 2018). |
First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 6547/CHENP/2012 (dated Sep. 10, 2018). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Jun. 12, 2018). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,283 (dated May 23, 2018). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,283 (dated Apr. 12, 2018). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Apr. 5, 2018). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,283 (dated Feb. 22, 2018). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Feb. 5, 2018). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480005758.2 (dated Jan. 2, 2018). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Nov. 3, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,660 (dated Nov. 2, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,591 (dated Nov. 1, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,503 (dated Oct. 26, 2017). |
Advisory Action, Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary, and AFCP 2.0 Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Sep. 22, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,283 (dated Aug. 30, 2017). |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated Jul. 27, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,660 (dated Jul. 21, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,503 (dated Jun. 30, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,591 (dated Jun. 30, 2017). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Jun. 30, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 (dated May 1, 2017). |
Commonly-assigned U.S. Appl. No. 15/582,591 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Access Network Protocol Interworking and Authentication Proxying,” (filed Apr. 28, 2017). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 12 751 783.7 (dated Mar. 15, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,015 (dated Mar. 10, 2017). |
Letter Regarding Decision to Grant for Chinese Application No. ZL201280018288.4 (dated Feb. 14, 2017). |
Letter Regarding Decision to Grant for Chinese Application No. ZL201280013938.6 (dated Feb. 3, 2017). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,679 (dated Feb. 2, 2017). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-553784 (dated Jan. 24, 2017). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,025 (dated Jan. 20, 2017). |
Letter Regarding Decision to Grant for Chinese Patent Application No. ZL201280018298.8 (dated Jan. 10, 2017). |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 12741984.4 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,025 (dated Dec. 13, 2016). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12751812.4 (dated Nov. 24, 2016). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,015 (dated Oct. 31, 2016). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10841605.8 (dated Oct. 27, 2016). |
Letter Regarding Decision to Grant a Chinese Patent for Chinese Patent Appication No. ZL201280019607.3 (dated Oct. 10, 2016). |
Notification of the Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280013938.6 (dated Oct. 9, 2016). |
Notification of the Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280018288.4 (dated Sep. 5, 2016). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12 751 812.4 (dated Sep. 2, 2016). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,025 (dated Aug. 26, 2016). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Patent Applicaton No. 12751986.6 (dated Aug. 19, 2016). |
Intent to Grant for European Patent Application No. 10841605.8 (dated Aug. 12, 2016). |
Letter Regarding Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-553784 (dated Jul. 19, 2016). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Chinese Patent Application No. ZL201280018297.3 (dated Jul. 4, 2016). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Application No. 12 751 986.6 (dated Jun. 8, 2016). |
Letter Regarding Notice of grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-552714 (dated May 31, 2016). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Application No. 12752952.7 (dated Apr. 29, 2016). |
Official Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556860 (dated Apr. 26, 2016). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280018298.8 (dated Mar. 3, 2016). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10841605.8 (dated Feb. 22, 2016). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12752952.7 (dated Feb. 10, 2016). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556855 (dated Feb. 2, 2016). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280019607.3 (dated Feb. 1, 2016). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280013938.6 (dated Jan. 27, 2016). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280018297.3 (dated Jan. 15, 2016). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201280018288.4 (dated Dec. 29, 2015). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 12 751 986.6 (dated Dec. 22, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,547 (dated Dec. 11, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-552714 (dated Dec. 8, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556860 (dated Nov. 17, 2015). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 14702996.1 (dated Nov. 4, 2015). |
Commonly-assigned U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,283 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Remote Access Dial in User Service (RADIUS) Proxy and Diameter Agent Address Resolution,” (filed Oct. 31, 2015). |
Commonly-assigned U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,660 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Remote Authentication Dial in User Service (RADIUS) Message Loop Detection and Mitigation,” (filed Oct. 30, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,071 (dated Oct. 30, 2015). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,547 (dated Oct. 16, 2015). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability & Response to Rule 312 Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,552 (dated Aug. 27, 2015). |
Commonly-Assigned, U.S. Appl. No. 14/826,289 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Access Network Session Correlation for Policy Control,” (filed Aug. 14, 2015). |
Commonly-assigned U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,015 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Access Network Protocol Interworking and Authentication Proxying,” (filed Aug. 14, 2015). |
Commonly-assignedU.S. Appl. No. 14/827,025 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Access Network Signaling Protocol Interworking for User Authentication,” (filed Aug. 14, 2015). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,547 (dated Aug. 10, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Publication of Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-509509 (Aug. 5, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Publication of Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556857 (Aug. 5, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556860 (dated Jul. 21, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,071 (dated Jul. 8, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Publication of Patent for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556675 (Jun. 10, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-509509 (dated Jun. 2, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556857 (dated May 26, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,552 (dated May 20, 2015). |
Decision to Grant for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080065174.6 (dated Apr. 16, 2015). |
Second Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556857 (dated Apr. 14, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Notice of Grant for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556675 (dated Mar. 31, 2015). |
Letter Regarding Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556855 (dated Feb. 24, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Feb. 12, 2015). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,552 (dated Feb. 9, 2015). |
Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Feb. 4, 2015). |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 12751986.6 (dated Jan. 20, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/748,547 (dated Jan. 5, 2015). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Dec. 26, 2014). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/465,552 (dated Oct. 17, 2014). |
Letter Regarding Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-556675 (dated Sep. 30, 2014). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Sep. 25, 2014). |
First Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2013-556857 (dated Sep. 24, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Sep. 3, 2014). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12752952.7 (dated Aug. 27, 2014). |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080065174.6 (dated Aug. 13, 2014). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12751783.7 (dated Jul. 22, 2014). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12751812.4 (dated Jul. 16, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (dated Jul. 10, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (dated Apr. 25, 2014). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (dated Apr. 24, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/011548 (dated Mar. 28, 2014). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Mar. 21, 2014). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Feb. 20, 2014). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12781800.3 (dated Feb. 12, 2014). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Feb. 10, 2014). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 10841605.8 (dated Feb. 3, 2014). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (dated Jan. 14, 2014). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (dated Dec. 30, 2013). |
Notification of Publication and Entry into Examination Procedure for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280013938.6 (Dec. 18, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751986.6 (dated Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751783.7 (dated Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12751812.4 (dated Dec. 11, 2013). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 12741984.4 (dated Nov. 13, 2013). |
Declaration of Mark Kanode for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893, filed Nov. 1, 2013. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Oct. 24, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Oct. 23, 2013). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Oct. 18, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (dated Sep. 19, 2013). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (dated Sep. 13, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/974,869 (dated Aug. 19, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Aug. 5, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (dated Jul. 1, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,914 (dated Jun. 7, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,352 (dated May 28, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Mar. 26, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,949 (dated Feb. 15, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,928 (dated Jan. 7, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,410 (dated Dec. 20, 2012). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/409,893 (dated Dec. 13, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,914 (dated Nov. 6, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/036784 (dated Nov. 1, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,352 (dated Oct. 26, 2012). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10841605.8 (dated Oct. 17, 2012). |
Fajardo et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 6733, pp. 1-152 (Oct. 2012). |
Li et al., “MCC: A Message and Command Correlation Method for Identifying New Interactive Protocols via Session Analysis,” Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1-10 (Jun. 2012). |
Notification of Transmital of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027281 (dated Jun. 15, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2012/027263 (dated Jun. 14, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027736 (dated Jun. 12, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/023971 (dated Jun. 11, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/027269 (dated Jun. 11, 2012). |
“Multi-Protocol Routing Agent User's Guide,” 910-6404-001 Revision A, Policy Management, Tekelec, pp. 1-70 (Jun. 2012). |
Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC for European Application No. 05854512.0 (dated Mar. 15, 2012). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European application No. 05854512.0 (dated Nov. 11, 2011). |
Notification of the Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/061934 (dated Oct. 25, 2011). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated May 11, 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Evolved Packet System (EPS); Mobility Management Entity (MME) and Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) related interfaces based on Diameter protocol (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 29.272, V10.2.0, pp. 1-95 (Mar. 2011). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and Charging Control Architecture (Release 11),” 3GPP TS 23.203 V11.0.1, pp. 1-137 (Jan. 2011). |
“Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller—One Platform to Deliver the Wonders of 4G,” Traffix Systems, The Diameter Control Plane Experts, pp. 1-7 (2011). |
“Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller (SDC),” Traffix Systems, The Diameter Control Plane Experts, pp. 1-5 (2011). |
“Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller (SDC) Diameter Gateway—Use Case Development Scenarios,” Traffix Systems, The Diameter Control Plane Experts, www.traffixsystems.com pp. 1-4 (2011). |
“Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller Diameter Load Balancer: Scalability for your Control Plane,” Traffix Systems, The Diameter Control Plane Experts, www.traffixsystems.com pp. 1-3 (2011). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated Dec. 22, 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Sh Interface based on the Diameter protocol; Protocol details (Release 8),” 3GPP TS 29.329, V8.8.0, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05 854 512.0 (dated Oct. 12, 2010). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.228 version 9.4.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 123 228, V9.4.0, pp. 1-130 (Oct. 2010). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; End-to-end Quality of Service (QoS) concept and architecture (3GPP TS 23.207 version 9.0.0 Release 9),” ETSI TS 123 207, V9.0.0, pp. 1-40 (Oct. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Packet Switched (PS) domain charging (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.251, V9.4.0, pp. 1-76 (Oct. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.299, V9.4.0, pp. 1-148 (Jun. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Charging architecture and principles (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 32.240, V9.1.0, pp. 1-44 (Jun. 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE+ePC=EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” EFORT, pp. 1-229 (Part 1 of 2) (May 2010). |
Znaty, “Diameter, GPRS, (LTE+ePC=EPS), IMS, PCC and SDM,” EFORT pp. 230-461 (Part 2 of 2) (May 2010). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control signalling flows and Quality of Service (QoS) parameter mapping (Release 9),” 3rd Generation Partnership Project, TS 29.213 V9.2.0, pp. 1-129 (Mar. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-11 (Mar. 2010). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 05854512.0 (dated Feb. 8, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated Dec. 9, 2009). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 23.203, V9.3.0, pp. 1-123 (Dec. 2009). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 05854512.0 (dated Nov. 17, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated May 28, 2009). |
“Cisco Content Services Gateway—2nd Generation Release 3.5 Installation and Configuration Guide,” Chapter 10: Configuring Gx Support, pp. 10-1-10-10, Chapter 11: Configuring Mobile PCC Support, pp. 11-1-11-8, URL: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/csg2/3.5/installation/guide/csg3-51.pdf (Jun. 5, 2009). |
Gundavelli et al., “Network Mobility (NEMO) Management Information Base,” RFC 5488, pp. 1-44 (Apr. 2009). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem Sh interface; Signalling flows and message contents (Release 8),” 3GPP TS 29.328 V8.4.0, pp. 1-42 (Mar. 2009). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated Oct. 6, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated May 7, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US05/45813 (dated Mar. 24, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated Feb. 21, 2008). |
Chiba et al., “Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” RFC 5176, pp. 1-32 (Jan. 2008). |
Restriction Requirment for U.S. Appl. No. 11/303,757 (dated Oct. 4, 2007). |
“Tekelec Announces TekCore IMS Core Platform,” pp. 1-2 (Jun. 5, 2006). |
“Operator Guidebook to IMS and New Generation Networks and Services,” www.morianagroup.com, Second Edition, 480 pgs. (Feb. 2006). |
Liu et al., “IBM Technical Library, Introduction to Diameter,” pp. 1-9, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wireless/library/wi-diameter (Jan. 24, 2006). |
Arkko et al., “Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA),” RFC 4187, pp. 1-79 (Jan. 2006). |
Haverinen et al., “Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) Subscriber Identity Modules (EAP-SIM),” RFC 4186, pp. 1-80 (Jan. 2006). |
Rouse, “Platform,” http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/definition/platform, pp. 1-2 (2006-2009). |
Camarillo et al., “The 3G IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), Merging the Internet and the Cellular Worlds,” Second Edition, pp. xvii-427 (2006). |
Fathi et al., “On VoIP Session setup delay using SIP over correlated fading channels,” IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, pp. 1-5 (2005). |
Hakala et al., “Diameter Credit-Control Application,” RFC 4006, pp. 1-114 (Aug. 2005). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Network Access Server Application,” RFC 4005, pp. 1-85 (Aug. 2005). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Mobile IPv4 Application,” RFC 4004, pp. 1-53 (Aug. 2005). |
“Operator Guidebook to IMS and New Generation Networks and Services,” www.morianagroup.com, First Edition, pp. 1-450 (Aug. 2005) (Part 1 of 2). |
“Operator Guidebook to IMS and New Generation Networks and Services,” www.morianagroup.com, First Edition, pp. 451-934 (Aug. 2005) (Part 2 of 2). |
Gonzalo et al., “The 3G IP Multimedia Subsystem,” Chapter 3: General Principles of the IMS Architecture, Chapter 5: Session Control in the IMS, pp. 29-39, 91-105 (Aug. 20, 2004). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem IMS Over and Applications,” 3G Americas, pp. 1-17 (Jul. 2004). |
Aboba et al., “Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP),” RFC 3748, pp. 1-67 (Jun. 2004). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; technical Specification Group Core Network; IP Multimedia (IM) Session Handling; IM Call Model; Stage 2 (Release 6),” 3GPP TS 23.218, V6.1.0, pp. 1-56 (Mar. 2004). |
“IMS Security Framework,” 3GPP2 S.R0086-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-39 (Dec. 11, 2003). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem—Accounting Information Flows and Protocol,” 3GPP2 X.S0013-008-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-42 (Dec. 2003). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem—Charging Architecture,” 3GPP2 X.S0013-007-0, Version 1.0, pp. 1-16 (Dec. 2003). |
“All-IP Core Network Multimedia Domain,” 3rd Generation Partnerships Project 2 (3GPP2), 3GPP2 X.S0013-000-0, Version 1.0, pp. i-ii and 1-14 (Dec. 2003). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network; Cx and Dx Interfaces Based on the Diameter Protocol; Protocol Details (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 29.229, V5.6.0, pp. 1-23 (Dec. 2003). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 3588, pp. 1-147 (Sep. 2003). |
Aboba et al., “RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service) Support For Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP),” RFC 3579, pp. 1-46 (Sep. 2003). |
“Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Stage 2 (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 23.228, V5.7.0, pp. 1-130 (Dec. 2002). |
Olson et al., “Support for IPv6 in Session Description Protocol (SDP),” RFC 3266, pp. 1-5 (Jun. 2002). |
Rosenberg et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” RFC 3261, pp. 1-252 (Jun. 2002). |
“ITP Operations Manual,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-320 (May 1, 2002). |
Howard, “Sipping IETF51 3GPP Security and Authentication,” http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/01aug/slides/sipping-7/index.htm, 24 pgs. (Dowloaded from Internet on Dec. 16, 2005) (Sep. 13, 2001). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-07, Section 6.3, p. 68 (Jul. 2001). |
Narten et al., “Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6,” RFC 3041, pp. 1-16 (Jan. 2001). |
“Configuring ITP Optional Features,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 29-76 (2001). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point Q & A,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-15 (1992-2001). |
Faltstrom, “E.164 Number and DNS,” RFC 2916, pp. 1-10 (Sep. 2000). |
Rigney et al., “RADIUS Accounting,” RFC 2866, pp. 1-26 (Jun. 2000). |
Rigney et al., “Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS),” RFC 2865, pp. 1-70 (Jun. 2000). |
Vaha-Sipila, “URLs for Telephone Calls,” RFC 2806, pp. 1-20 (Apr. 2000). |
Aboba et al., “The Network Access Identifier,” RFC 2486, pp. 1-8 (Jan. 1999). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Proxy Server Extensions,” IETF Working Draft, draft-calhoun-diameter-proxy-01.txt, pp. 1-21 (Aug. 1, 1998). |
Berners-Lee et al., “Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax,” RFC 2396, pp. 1-38 (Aug. 1998). |
Tekelec, “Eagle® Feature Guide,” P/N 910-1225-01, pp. 1-208 (Jan. 1998). |
Yajnik et al., “Packet loss correlation in the MBone multicast network,” Computer Science Department Faculuty Publication Series, vol. 171, pp. 1-23 (1996). |
Jalava, “Service Routing in 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem,” Nokia, pp. 1-16 (Publication Date Unknown). |