The subject matter described herein relates to NF discovery and selection. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media supporting multiple preferred localities in NF discovery and selection procedures.
In 5G telecommunications networks, a network function that provides service is referred to as a producer network function (NF) or NF service producer. A network function that consumes services is referred to as a consumer NF or NF service consumer. A network function can be a producer NF, a consumer NF, or both, depending on whether the network function is consuming, producing, or consuming and producing services. The terms “producer NF” and “NF service producer” are used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the terms “consumer NF” and “NF service consumer” are used interchangeably herein.
A given producer NF may have many service endpoints, where a service endpoint is the point of contact for one or more NF instances hosted by the producer NF. The service endpoint is identified by a combination of Internet protocol (IP) address and port number or a fully qualified domain name that resolves to an IP address and port number on a network node that hosts a producer NF. An NF instance is an instance of a producer NF that provides a service. A given producer NF may include more than one NF instance. It should also be noted that multiple NF instances can share the same service endpoint.
Producer NFs register with a network function repository function (NRF). The NRF maintains service profiles of available NF instances identifying the services supported by each NF instance. The terms “service profiles” and “NF profiles” are used interchangeably herein. Consumer NFs can subscribe to receive information about producer NF instances that have registered with the NRF.
In addition to consumer NFs, another type of network node that can subscribe to receive information about NF service instances is a service communications proxy (SCP). The SCP subscribes with the NRF and obtains reachability and service profile information regarding producer NF service instances. Consumer NFs connect to the service communications proxy, and the service communications proxy load balances traffic among producer NF service instances that provide the required services or directly routes the traffic to the destination producer NF instances.
In addition to the SCP, another example of an intermediate proxy node that routes traffic between producer and consumer NFs is the security edge protection proxy (SEPP). The SEPP is the network node used to protect control plane traffic that is exchanged between different 5G public land mobile networks (PLMNs). As such, the SEPP performs message filtering, policing and topology hiding for all application programming interface (API) messages that are transmitted between PLMNs.
One problem in 5G communications networks is the inflexibility of the 3GPP-defined NF discovery procedure in discovering other NFs in the same locality or in a locality that is near to a consumer NF. 3GPP TS 29.510 allows each NF to register its own locality with the NRF. 3GPP TS 29.510 also allows consumer NFs to specify a single preferred producer NF location or locality in a preferred-locality attribute as part of an NF discovery request. However, if there are no producer NFs in the locality that matches the locality specified in the preferred-locality attribute in the discovery request, the NRF may return a set of NF profiles in response to a discovery request, some of which may be more preferred than others. The consumer NF may be required to parse through the NF profiles and extract or read the locality attribute of each profile to identify those with more preferred localities than others. Such processing cannot be reduced or avoided given the inflexibility of existing NF discovery procedures.
Accordingly, there exists a need for improved methods, systems, and computer readable media for NF discovery and selection that considers multiple different locality preferences of a consumer NF.
A method for supporting multiple preferred producer NF locations in a preferred-locality attribute for network function (NF) discovery and selection includes, at an NF repository function (NRF) including at least one processor and a memory, receiving, from producer NFs, NF registration messages including NF profiles with locality attributes and registering the producer NFs by storing the NF profiles including the locality attributes in an NF registration database local to the NRF. The method further includes receiving, from a requesting NF, an NF discovery request having query parameters for discovering producer NFs, the query parameters including a preferred-locality attribute identifying a plurality of different preferred producer NF locations. The method further includes retrieving NF profiles from the NF registration database having locality attributes that match any of the preferred producer NF locations. The method further includes generating an NF discovery response including the NF profiles retrieved from the NF registration database. The method further includes forwarding the NF discovery response to the requesting NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, receiving the NF discovery request from a requesting NF includes receiving the NF discovery request from a consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, receiving the NF discovery request from a requesting NF includes receiving the NF discovery request from a service communications proxy (SCP) performing delegated discovery on behalf of a consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, receiving the NF discovery request includes receiving an NF discovery request that indicates relative preferences of the requesting NF of the preferred NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, generating the NF discovery response includes indicating, in the NF discovery response, relative preferences of the NF profiles based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, indicating the relative preferences of the NF profiles includes one of: setting priority attributes of the NF profiles based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request; and ordering the NF profiles in the discovery response based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the method for supporting multiple preferred producer NF locations in the preferred-locality attribute includes retrieving NF profiles from the NF registration database having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, generating the discovery response includes including, in the discovery response, the NF profiles in having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations and indication that the NF profiles having locality attributes that match one of the preferred producer NF locations are more preferred than the NF profiles having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, generating the discovery response includes excluding, from the discovery response NF profiles that do not match any of the preferred producer NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the method for supporting plural preferred producer NF locations in the preferred-locality attribute includes, at the requesting NF, receiving the discovery response, selecting one of the NF profiles having a locality attribute that matches one of the preferred NF locations, and sending a service based interface (SBI) service request to a producer NF corresponding to the selected NF profile.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, a system for supporting multiple locations in a preferred-locality attribute for network function (NF) discovery and selection, is provided. The system includes an NF repository function (NRF) including at least one processor and a memory. The system further includes an NF discovery/registration manager implemented by the at least one processor for receiving, from producer NFs, NF registration messages including NF profiles with locality attributes and registering the producer NFs by storing the NF profiles including the locality attributes in an NF registration database local to the NRF, receiving, from a requesting NF, an NF discovery request having query parameters for discovering producer NFs, the query parameters including a preferred-locality attribute identifying a plurality of different preferred producer NF locations, retrieving NF profiles from the NF registration database having locality attributes that match any of the preferred producer NF locations, generating an NF discovery response including the NF profiles retrieved from the NF registration database, and forwarding the NF discovery response to the requesting NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the requesting NF comprises a consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the requesting NF comprises a service communications proxy (SCP) performing delegated discovery on behalf of a consumer NF.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the NF discovery request indicates relative preferences of the requesting NF of the preferred NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, in generating the NF discovery response, the NF discovery/registration manager is configured to indicate, in the NF discovery response, relative preferences of the NF profiles based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the NF discovery/registration manager is configured to indicate the relative preferences of the NF profiles in the discovery response by one of: setting priority attributes of the NF profiles based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request; and ordering the NF profiles based on the relative preferences indicated in the discovery request.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the NF discovery/registration manager is configured to retrieve NF profiles from the NF registration database having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, wherein the NF discovery/registration manager is configured to include, in the discovery response, the NF having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations and an indication that the NF profiles having locality attributes that match one of the preferred producer NF locations are more preferred than the NF profiles having attributes that match NF selection attributes in the discovery request but that do not have locality attributes that match any of the different preferred producer NF locations.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, the indication in the discovery response includes one of: priority attributes in the NF profiles; and an order of the NF profiles in the discovery response.
According to another aspect of the subject matter described herein, A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by a processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. The steps include receiving, from producer network functions (NFs), NF registration messages including NF profiles with locality attributes and registering the producer NFs by storing the NF profiles including the locality attributes in an NF registration database local to an NF repository function (NRF). The steps further include receiving, from a requesting NF, an NF discovery request having query parameters for discovering producer NFs, the query parameters including a preferred-locality attribute identifying a plurality of different preferred producer NF locations. The steps further include retrieving NF profiles from the NF registration database having locality attributes that match any of the preferred producer NF locations. The steps further include generating an NF discovery response including the NF profiles retrieved from the NF registration database. The steps further include forwarding the NF discovery response to the requesting NF.
The subject matter described herein can be implemented in software in combination with hardware and/or firmware. For example, the subject matter described herein can be implemented in software executed by a processor. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein can be implemented using a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
NRF 100 is a repository for NF or service profiles of producer NF instances. In order to communicate with a producer NF instance, a consumer NF or an SCP must obtain the NF or service profile of the producer NF instance from NRF 100. The NF or service profile is a JavaScript object notation (JSON) data structure defined in 3GPP TS 29.510. The NF or service profile definition includes at least one of a fully qualified domain name (FQDN), an Internet protocol (IP) version 4 (IPv4) address or an IP version 6 (IPv6) address.
In
The NFs illustrated in
A network slice selection function (NSSF) 116 provides network slicing services for devices seeking to access specific network capabilities and characteristics associated with a network slice. A network exposure function (NEF) 118 provides application programming interfaces (APIs) for application functions seeking to obtain information about Internet of things (IoT) devices and other UEs attached to the network. NEF 118 performs similar functions to the service capability exposure function (SCEF) in 4G networks.
A radio access network (RAN) 120 connects user equipment (UE) 114 to the network via a wireless link. Radio access network 120 may be accessed using a g-Node B (gNB) (not shown in
SEPP 126 filters incoming traffic from another PLMN and performs topology hiding for traffic exiting the home PLMN. SEPP 126 may communicate with a SEPP in a foreign PLMN which manages security for the foreign PLMN. Thus, traffic between NFs in different PLMNs may traverse two SEPP functions, one for the home PLMN and the other for the foreign PLMN.
As described above, one problem that can occur in 5G networks is the inability to provide for fine-grained specification of preferred producer NF localities during the NF discovery process.
As illustrated by Table 1, the locality attribute stores operator defined information about the location of an NF instance, such as geographic location and data center. According to Note 3 of Table 1, the locality attribute can be used during NF discovery to select a producer NF that is in the same data center as the requesting consumer NF. However, because 3GPP TS 29.510 only allows the consumer NF to specify a single preferred locality during NF discovery, the consumer NF may receive NF profiles of producer NFs that are not in the preferred locality, resulting an additional processing burden on the consumer NF to identify and select an optimal producer NF.
From Table 2, win the locality attribute is present, the NRF should prefer NF profiles with the locality that matches the preferred locality. The NRF may also return additional NF profiles in the discovery response not matching the preferred locality, for example, if no NF profile is found matching the preferred locality. The NRF may also set a lower priority for additional NF profiles in the discovery response that do not match the preferred locality. There are two possible interpretations of Note C—one is that the NRF should only return additional NF profiles if no NF profiles matching the preferred locality are present. Another interpretation is that the NRF can return additional NF profiles with lower priority even if NF profiles matching the preferred locality are present.
In line 3 of the message flow diagram in
The use of a preferred-locality attribute with a single preferred NF location in NF discovery works when the NF matching the consumer NF's preferred locality is available. However, if there are no NFs matching the consumer NF's preferred locality, the consumer NF may receive multiple NF profiles that do not match the preferred locality and may be required to parse each of the profiles, identify their localities, and then select one of the profiles based on the consumer NF's preferred locality.
Consumer NF1 200 receives the discovery response and may be required to parse through large numbers of non-preferred producer NF profiles to select an optimal producer NF to provide a service. In line 3, consumer NF1 200 selects one of NF2-NF5 to provide the service and sends an SBI service request to the selected producer NF. In line 4, the selected producer NF returns an SBI service response message to consumer NF1 200. Thus,
To avoid this difficulty, the subject matter described herein includes enhancing the functionality of a consumer NF to specify multiple preferred localities in the NF discover message and enhancing the functionality of the NRF to select producer NF profiles that match any of the preferred localities and set priorities of producer NF profiles based on the preferred producer NF localities specified in the NF discovery request message.
the locations identified in the
E.g. location1 and locartion2,
The NRF shall iterate through NF
profiles that match the target NF
type and set priorities of matching
NF profiles based on whether or
not the localities match any of the
locations identified in the
preferred-locality attribute.
In Table 3, the underlined portion indicates added text to the NRF processing defined in Table 2. From the added text in Table 3, rather than processing a preferred-locality attribute with a single preferred NF location, the NRF iterates through NF profiles that match the target NF type, identifies NF profiles that match with any of the locations specified in the preferred-locality attribute, and sets priority attributes of each NF profile based on whether the localities in the NF profiles match any of the locations identified in the preferred-locality attribute. In one example, NF profiles with a locality attribute matching any of the locations identified in the preferred-locality attribute may be assigned the same priority. In another example, the order of the locations in the preferred-locality attribute in the discovery request may indicate a preference order of the locations, and the NRF may assign priorities to matching NF profiles based on the order in which locations are identified in the preferred-locality attribute (i.e., based on the relative preference of the locations set by the consumer NF). In 5G networks, a lower priority value indicates a higher preference (e.g., priority 0 indicates more preferred than priority 1). In the example illustrated in
Another change to the processing of the preferred-locality attribute indicated by Table 3 is the change in cardinality from 1 to N. That is, the current 3GPP specified cardinality of the preferred-locality attribute is 1, meaning that the attribute contains one preferred NF location. The proposed modification to the preferred-locality attribute changes the cardinality to N, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, meaning that the preferred-locality attribute can contain identifiers of plural preferred NF locations. In one implementation, the preferred-locality attribute contains strings that identify each preferred NF location, and the strings that identify different preferred NF locations are separated from each other by delimiters, such as commas.
In
If the NRF were configured in this manner, in the example in
In the example in
For the case in Model C where the consumer NF performs service discovery and selects an NF instance to which the service request is forwarded, the discovery request may include a preferred-locality attribute with multiple preferred producer NF locations, and the NRF operates as described above with respect to Table 3 to locate NF profiles with matching localities and set priorities of the NF profiles based on the matching localities. For the case in Model C where the consumer NF performs service discovery, selects an NF set, and forwards the SBI service request to the SCP, and the SCP interacts with the NRF to select a producer NF instance, the NRF may operate as described above with respect to Table 3 to return the NF profiles of NF sets that match any of the preferred producer NF locations specified in the preferred-locality attribute. The SCP may use the preferred localities of the consumer NF to select a producer NF instance from the NF set.
In yet another an alternate implementation, indirect communication with delegated discovery may be performed by an SCP on behalf of a consumer NF. Indirect communication with delegated discovery is referred to as Model D communication in Annex E of 3GPP TS 23.501. According to Model D, consumer NFs do not perform NF selection or discovery. Instead, the consumer NF adds necessary discovery and selection parameters to a service access request that is sent to the SCP. The SCP then performs discovery with an NRF, obtains a discovery response, selects a producer NF from the discovery response, and sends the SBI service request to the selected producer NF. Multiple preferred localities may be specified by the SCP in the discovery request. The use of multiple preferred localities for the case of indirect communication with delegated discovery is illustrated in
In step 1102, the process includes receiving, from a requesting NF, an NF discovery request having query parameters for discovering producer NFs, the query parameters including a preferred-locality attribute identifying a plurality of different preferred producer NF locations. For example, NRF 100 may receive a discovery request from a consumer NF or SCP with a locality attribute including multiple preferred producer NF locations. In one implementation, the discovery request may indicate the relative preferences on the part of the requesting NF of each of the preferred producer NF locations.
In step 1104, the process includes retrieving NF profiles from an NF registration database having locality attributes that match any of the preferred producer NF locations. For example, NRF 100 may search NF registration database 904 using the query parameters specified in the discovery request and initially locate NF profiles having an NF type attribute that matches the target NF type attribute specified in the discovery request. The NRF may identify, from the NF profiles having an NF type attribute that matches the target NF type specified in the discovery request, NF profiles that have a locality parameter that matches any of the preferred NF locations specified in the discovery requests. In one example, NRF 100 may extract the NF profiles having NF type attributes that match the target NF type and having locality attributes that match any of the preferred NF localities identified in the discovery request as well as NF profiles having NF type attributes that match the target NF type and having locality attributes that do not match any of the preferred NF localities identified in the discovery request. In such an implementation, NRF 100 may indicate, in the discovery response, relative preferences on the part of the consumer NF of the NF profiles having locality attributes that match one of the preferred NF locations and NF profiles having locality attributes that do not match one of the preferred NF locations. In an alternate implementation, NRF 100 may return in the discovery response only the NF profiles having an NF type attribute that matches the target NF type attribute in the discovery request and that have a locality that matches one of the preferred NF locations in the discovery request. In either implementation, NRF 100 may indicate relative preferences on the part of the consumer NF of the NF profiles having locality attributes that match one of the preferred NF locations identified in the discovery request.
In step 1106, the process includes generating an NF discovery response including the NF profiles retrieved from the NF registration database. As indicated in the preceding paragraph, the NF profiles returned in the response may include 1) those with locality attributes that match one of the preferred NF locations or 2) those with locality attributes that match one of the preferred NF locations and those with locality attributes that do not match one of the preferred NF locations. It should also be noted that if no NF profiles having a locality attribute that matches one of the preferred NF locations are located, then NRF 100 may return only the NF profiles with NF type attributes that match the target NF type and locality attributes that do not match any of the preferred NF locations. Relative priorities of the NF profiles returned in the response may optionally be indicated in any of the manners specified in the preceding paragraph. It should also be noted that NRF 100 may utilize the preferred NF locations received in the discovery request in combination with other query parameters in indicating relative priorities of NF profiles to be included in the discovery response.
In step 1108, the process includes forwarding the NF discovery response to the requesting NF. For example, if the requesting NF is a consumer NF performing non-delegated discovery, NRF 100 may return the discovery response to the requesting consumer NF. If the requesting NF is an SCP performing delegated discovery on behalf of a consumer NF, then NRF 100 may forward the NF discovery response to the SCP.
In step 1202, the process includes generating and sending a discovery request message to the NRF where the discovery request message includes a locality attribute identifying plural preferred NF locations. For example, consumer NF or SCP 200 or 101 may send an NF discover message to NRF 100, where the NF discover message includes query parameters for selecting producer NF profiles, and the query parameters include a preferred-locality attribute that identifies plural preferred NF locations. The discovery request also identifies the target NF type and may optionally identify the relative preferences of consumer NF 200 of the preferred producer NF locations identified in the preferred-locality attribute.
In step 1204, the process includes receiving a discovery response including NF profiles matching at least some of the query parameters in the discovery request. For example, consumer NF or SCP 200 or 101 may receive a discovery request from NRF 100 including NF profiles of producer NFs with attributes that match at least the target NF type and that match any of the preferred NF locations identified in the preferred-locality attribute in the discovery request.
In step 1206, the process includes selecting an NF profile from the NF profiles received from the NRF and sending an SBI service request to a producer NF corresponding to the selected NF profile. For example, consumer NF or SCP 200 or 101 may select, from the discovery response, an NF profile having a locality that matches one of the preferred NF locations indicated in the NF discovery request. If the discovery response indicates relative priorities of the NF profiles, consumer NF or SCP 200 or 101 may select the NF profile of the producer NF with the most preferred priority (lowest priority value). If the discovery response includes multiple NF profiles with the same priority, any suitable selection algorithm, including round robin selection, may be used.
Exemplary advantages of the subject matter described herein include enhanced NF discovery to efficiently select optimal producer NFs to provide service to a consumer NF, especially when the producer NF is not available in the same locality as the consumer NF. The preferred-locality attribute can be used in conjunction with other attributes, such as time of day, to benefit other use cases. The use of multiple preferred producer NF locations in the preferred-locality attribute in discovery requests provides for better control of NF discovery and more efficient discovery of producer NFs, especially in the case where there are no matches with the most preferred locality. The ability to indicate multiple preferred NF locations in the discovery request provides improved probability of finding or discovering NFs that are closer to the consumer NF.
The disclosure of each of the following references is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation, as the subject matter described herein is defined by the claims as set forth hereinafter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5381413 | Tobagi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6014558 | Thomas | Jan 2000 | A |
6748435 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7782776 | Shankar et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8023482 | Gong et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8300637 | Bennett, III et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8645565 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8811228 | Lopez et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8879431 | Ridel et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8954080 | Janakiraman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9124537 | Kolze | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9246762 | Watkins | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9667590 | Yan et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10097504 | Backholm | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10285155 | Dodd-Noble et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10299128 | Suthar et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10313362 | Ahuja et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10361843 | Suthar et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10595256 | Marupaduga et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10609154 | Talebi Fard et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10609530 | Patil et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10616934 | Talebi Fard et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10637753 | Taft | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10652098 | Kim | May 2020 | B2 |
10772062 | Albasheir et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10778527 | Assali et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10791044 | Krishan et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10819636 | Goel | Oct 2020 | B1 |
10880370 | Seenappa et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11109307 | Bartolome Rodrigo et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11271846 | Krishan | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20030174649 | Shankar et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030223414 | Wong | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003069 | Wong | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040141473 | Buot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040208183 | Balachandran et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050181776 | Verma | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193096 | Yu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060010224 | Sekar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070050331 | Bauman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070242738 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080101293 | Woo | May 2008 | A1 |
20090055835 | Zhu | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090141625 | Ghai et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090222584 | Josefsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110078674 | Ershov | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110202604 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130029708 | Fox et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130039176 | Kanode et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130198269 | Fleischman et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130272123 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140040975 | Raleigh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140379901 | Tseitlin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150016266 | Dumitrescu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150071074 | Zaidi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150263987 | Klein et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160142324 | Vihtari et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156513 | Zhang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164788 | Goel et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160234119 | Zaidi et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160315743 | Nagaraj et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160350683 | Bester et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160352588 | Subbarayan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380906 | Hodique | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170221015 | June et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180039494 | Lander et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180083882 | Krishan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180159780 | Essigmann et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180183724 | Callard et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180213391 | Inoue | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180262592 | Zandi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180262625 | McCarley et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285794 | Gray-Donald et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180324247 | Hood et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180324646 | Lee et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180343567 | Ashrafi | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190007366 | Voegele | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190045351 | Zee et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190075552 | Yu et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190116486 | Kim et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190116521 | Qiao et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190140895 | Ennis, Jr. et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158364 | Zhang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190173740 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190174561 | Sivavakeesar | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190182875 | Talebi Fard et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190191348 | Futaki et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190191467 | Dao et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190222633 | Howes et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190223093 | Watfa et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190230556 | Lee | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190261244 | Jung et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190268270 | Fattah | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190306251 | Talebi Fard et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190306907 | Andreoli-Fang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190313236 | Lee et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190313437 | Jung et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190313469 | Karampatsis et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190335002 | Bogineni et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190335534 | Atarius et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190342229 | Khinvasara et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190342921 | Loehr et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190349901 | Basu Mallick et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190357092 | Jung et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190380031 | Suthar et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190394284 | Baghel | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190394624 | Karampatsis et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190394833 | Talebi Fard et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200007632 | Landais et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200008069 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200028920 | Livanos et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200045753 | Dao et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200045767 | Velev et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053670 | Jung et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053724 | MolavianJazi et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053828 | Bharatia et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200059420 | Abraham | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200059856 | Cui et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200084663 | Park et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200092423 | Qiao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200092424 | Qiao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200106812 | Verma et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200127916 | Krishan | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200136911 | Assali et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200137174 | Stammers et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200177629 | Hooda et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200305033 | Keller et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200313996 | Krishan et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200314615 | Patil et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200336554 | Deshpande et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200404608 | Albasheir et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200412597 | Goel et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210007023 | Umapathy et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210044481 | Xu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210067480 | Goel | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210067485 | Goel | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210105214 | Goel | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210168055 | Lair | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210204200 | Krishan | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210235254 | Farooq | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210273977 | Karasaridis et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210274392 | Dao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210297935 | Belling et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210367916 | Belling et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210385286 | Wang et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210385732 | Reyes et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220038545 | Krishan | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220070648 | Krishan | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220131945 | Sapra et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105635345 | Feb 2019 | CN |
109788078 | May 2019 | CN |
2 575 303 | Apr 2013 | EP |
WO 2017143915 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018174021 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2018174516 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO 2019144321 | Jan 2019 | WO |
WO 2019034609 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO 2019062596 | Apr 2019 | WO |
WO 2019076273 | Apr 2019 | WO |
WO 2019144321 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO 2019215308 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2019220172 | Nov 2019 | WO |
WO 2020091934 | May 2020 | WO |
WO 2020263486 | Dec 2020 | WO |
WO 2021040827 | Mar 2021 | WO |
WO 2021055998 | Mar 2021 | WO |
WO 2021138074 | Jul 2021 | WO |
WO 2022025987 | Feb 2022 | WO |
WO 2022050987 | Mar 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/485,284 for Methods, Systems and Computer Readable Media for Providing Priority Resolver for Resolving Priorities and Network Function (NF) Instances (Unpublished, filed Sep. 24, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,446 (dated Sep. 30, 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2021/033031 (dated May 18, 2021). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,794 (dated Sep. 15, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/468,076 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Using Service Communications Proxy (SCP) or Security Edge Protection Proxy (SEPP) to Apply or Override Preferred-Locality Attribute During Network Function (NF) Discovery” (Unpublished, filed Sep. 7, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/487,142 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Network Function Discovery Using Preferred-Locality Information” (Unpublished, filed Sep. 28, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/397,968 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Processing Network Function (NF) Discovery Requests at NF Repository Function (NRF) Using Prioritized Lists of Preferred Locations,” (Unpublished, filed Aug. 9, 2021). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,446 (dated Jun. 16, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/337,356 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Applying or Overriding Preferred Locality Criteria in Processing Network Function (NF) Discovery Requests,” (Unpublished, filed Jun. 2, 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Session Management Services; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP 29.502, V17.1.0, pp. 1-299 (Jun. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Principles and Guidelines for Services Definition; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 29.501, V17.2.0, pp. 1-78 (Jun. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Security architecture and procedures for 5G system (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 33.501, V17.1.0, pp. 1-256 (Mar. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 23.501, V17.0.0, pp. 1-489 (Mar. 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/203,693 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Stream Tuning for Load and Overload Control,” (Unpublished, filed Mar. 16, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,725 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Service Communications Proxy (SCP)—Specific Prioritized Network Function (NF) Discovery and Routing,” (Unpublished, filed Sep. 1, 2020). |
Vixie et al., “Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS Update),” Network Working Group, RFC 2136, pp. 1-26 (Apr. 1997). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/392,288 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Optimized Routing of Service Based Interface (SBI) Request Messages to Remote Network Function (NF) Repository Functions Using Indirect Communications via Service Communications Proxy (SCP)” (Unpublished, filed Aug. 3, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/730,799 (dated Jul. 30, 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2021/024000 (dated Jun. 24, 2021). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/356,451 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Resolution of Inter-Network Domain Names” (Unpublished, filed Jun. 23, 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for U.S. Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2021/020120 (dated Jun. 1, 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for U.S. Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2021/020122 (dated Jun. 1, 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Technical Realization of Service Based Architecture; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 29.500, V17.2.0, pp. 1-100 (Mar. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V17.1.0, pp. 1-243 (Mar. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Numbering, addressing and identification; (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 23.003, V17.1.0, pp. 1-143 (Mar. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) Interconnection; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 29.573, V17.0.0, pp. 1-100 (Mar. 2021). |
Nokia et al., “Discussion paper on authorization for Model D Indirect communications”, 3GPP TSG SA WG3; S3-194380 (Nov. 11, 2019). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 (dated Jun. 21, 2021). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 (dated May 7, 2021). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/001,599 (dated May 5, 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/065765 (dated Apr. 15, 2021). |
Ex Parte Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/730,799 (Apr. 7, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/555,817 (dated Mar. 24, 2021). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Patent Cooperation Treaty Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/061885 (dated Feb. 4, 2021). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Patent Cooperation Treaty Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/057712 (dated Feb. 2, 2021). |
Cheshire, S. et al., “Apple's DNS Long-Lived Queries protocol draft-sekar-dns-llq-06,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), pp. 1-26 (Aug. 23, 2019). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 (dated Feb. 2, 2021). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 (dated Jan. 26, 2021). |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,446 (dated Dec. 22, 2020). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/555,817 (Dec. 3, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Continuation-in-Part U.S. Appl. No. 17/102,404 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Policing Access Point Name-Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate (APN-AMBR) Across Packet Data Network Gateway Data Plane (P-GW DP) Worker Instances,” (Unpublished, filed Nov. 23, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,149 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Optimized Routing of Messages Relating to Existing Network Function (NF) Subscriptions Using an Intermediate Forwarding NF Repository Function (NRF),” (Unpublished, filed Nov. 9, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/082,871 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Rank Processing for Network Function Selection,” (Unpublished, filed Oct. 28, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Continuation-in-Part U.S. Appl. No. 17/074,553 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Actively Discovering and Tracking Addresses Associated with 4G Service Endpoints,” (Unpublished, filed Oct. 19, 2020). |
“P-GW Administration Guide, StarOS Release 21.20,” Cisco, pp. 1-1164 (Oct. 11, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/102,404 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Policing Access Point Name-Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate (APN-AMBR) Across Packet Data Network Gateway Data Plane (P-GW DP) Worker Instances,” (Unpublished, filed Sep. 23, 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Non-Access-Stratum (NAS) protocol for Evolved Packet System (EPS); Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 24.301, V17.0.0, pp. 1-585 (Sep. 2020). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Architecture enhancements to facilitate communications with packet data networks and applications (Release 16), 3GPP TS 23.682, V16.8.0, pp. 1-135 (Sep. 2020). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 (dated Sep. 29, 2020). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,446 (dated Sep. 8, 2020). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,955 (dated Aug. 26, 2020). |
Notification of the Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2020/034723 (dated Aug. 17, 2020). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/555,817 (dated Aug. 7, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,794 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Preferred Network Function (NF) Location Routing Using Service Communications Proxy (SCP),” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 31, 2020). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/035004 (dated Jul. 7, 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.510 V16.4.0, pp. 1-206 (Jul. 2020). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/369,691 (dated May 12, 2020). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/356,446 (dated May 11, 2020). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,920 (dated Apr. 16, 2020). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,920 (dated Apr. 1, 2020). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,920 (dated Mar. 6, 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Procedures for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.502 V16.4.0, pp. 1-582 (Mar. 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V16.4.0, pp. 1-430 (Mar. 2020). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2019/053912 (dated Dec. 18, 2019). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Diameter-Peer-Wide Egress Rate Limiting at Diameter Relay Agent (DRA),” (Unpublished, filed Nov. 27, 2019). |
“5G; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS) (3GPP TS 23.501 version 15.6.0 Release 15),” ETSI TS 123 501, V15.6.0, pp. 1-168 (Oct. 2019). |
“5G; 5G System; Network function repository services; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.510 version 15.5.1 Release 15),” ETSI TS 129 510, V15.5.1, pp. 1-132 (Oct. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G Systems; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.510 V.16.1.1, pp. 1-150 (Oct. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Technical Realization of Service Based Architecture; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.500 V16.1.0, pp. 1-43 (Sep. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Service and System Aspects; System Architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501 V16.2.0, pp. 1-391 (Sep. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Architecture enhancements to facilitate communications with packet data networks and applications (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.682, V16.4.0, pp. 1-30 (Sep. 2019). |
“5G; 5G System; Technical Realization of Service Based Architecture; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.500 version 15.5.0 Release 15),” ETSI TS 129 500, V15.5.0, pp. 1-40 (Sep. 2019). |
Cheshire et al., “Apple's DNS Long-Lived Queries protocol,” Network Working Group, Apple, Inc., pp. 1-26 (Aug. 22, 2019). |
“Diameter and Diameter Applications,” Alcatel-Lucent, http://infodoc.alcatel-lucent.com/htrnl/0_add-h-f/93-0098-HTML/7750_SR_OS_Triple_Play_Guide/GX-PolicyMgmt.html, pp. 1-40 (Aug. 22, 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NG-RAN; NG Application Protocol (NGAP) (Release 15),” 3GPP TS 38.413, V15.4.0, pp. 1-328 (Jul. 2019). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,955 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Producer Network Function (NF) Service Instance Wide Egress Rate Limiting at Service Communication Proxy (SCP),” (Unpublished, filed Jun. 26, 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V16.0.0, pp. 1-135 (Jun. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Restoration Procedures (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.527, V16.0.0, pp. 1-19 (Jun. 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Numbering, addressing and identification (Release 15),” 3GPP TS 23.003, V15.7.0, pp. 1-131 (Jun. 2019). |
Huawei, “eSBA: reselection of producer instance,” 3GPP TSG-SA2 Meeting #132, pp. 1-2 (Apr. 12, 2019). |
“Class of Service Feature Guide (Routers and EX9200 Switches),” Junos® OS, Juniper Networks, pp. 1-1530 (Apr. 10, 2019). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System Architecture and 5G; Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501, V16.0.0, pp. 1-318 (Mar. 2019). |
Penttinen, “5G Explained: Security and Deployment of Advanced Mobile Communications,” Chapter 6, Section 6.3.8 NRF, 2 pages (Feb. 2019). |
“Oracle Communications Diameter Signaling Router,” Release Notice, Release 8.3, E93179 Revision 02, Oracle, pp. 1-98 (Dec. 2018). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Network and Terminals; 5G Systems; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 15),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V15.2.0, pp. 1-113 (Dec. 2018). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Network and Terminals; 5G Systems; Principles and Guidelines for Services Definition; Stage 3 (Release 15),” 3GPP TS 29.501, V15.2.0, pp. 1-66 (Dec. 2018). |
“Addressing 5G Network Function Requirements,” Intel® FPGAs and Intel PAC 5G QoS and IPSec Benchmarking, White Paper, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 2018). |
“5G; 5G System; Technical Realization of Service Based Architecture; Stage 3 (3GPP TS 29.500 version 15.0.0 Release 15),” ETSI TS 129 500, V15.0.0, pp. 1-29 (Jul. 2018). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on Enhancements to the Service-Based Architecture (Release 16),” 3GPP TR 23.742, V0.3.0, pp. 1-64 (Jul. 2018). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on Enhancements to the Service-Based Architecture (Release 16),” 3GPP TR 23.742, V0.2.0, pp. 1-39 (Jun. 2018). |
“5G; Procedures for the 5G System (3GPP TS 23.502 version 15.2.0 Release 15),” ETSI TS 123 502 V15.2.0, pp. 1-46 (Jun. 2018). |
Docomo, “Update Solution 4 for implicit registration,” SA WG2 Meeting #129, pp. 1-2 (Oct. 15-19, 2018). |
“Cisco Ultra 5G Packet Core Solution,” Cisco, White paper, https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/routers/network-convergence-system-500-series-routers/white-paper-c11-740360.pdf, pp. 1-11 (2018). |
Li et al., “Mobile Edge Computing Platform Deployment in 4G LTE Networks: A Middlebox Approach,” https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/hotedge18/hotedge18-papers-li.pdf, 6 pages (2018). |
Scholl et al., “An API First Approach to Microservices Development,” Oracle, https://blogs.oracle.com/developers/an-api-first-approach-to-microservices-development, pp. 1-12 (Nov. 8, 2017). |
Brown et al., “Service-Based Architecture for 5G Core Networks,” Huawei, Heavy Reading, https://www.3g4g.co.uk/5G/5Gtech_6004_2017_11_Service-Based-Architecture-for-5G-Core-Networks_HR_Huawei.pdf, pp. 1-12 (Nov. 2017). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System Architecture for the 5G System; Stage 2 (Release 15),” 3GPP TS 23.501, V1.5.0, pp. 1-170 (Nov. 2017). |
“Pseudo-CR on Service Discovery and Registration using NRF service,” Ericsson, 3GPP TSG CT4 Meeting #79, 3GPP TR 29.891—v0.3.0, pp. 1-4 (Aug. 21-25, 2017). |
Carlton et al., “HTTP and DNS in a 5G World,” https://www.computerworld.com/article/3204594/http-and-dns-in-a-5g-world.html, pp. 1-5 (Jun. 30, 2017). |
Benacer et al., “A High-Speed Traffic Manager Architecture for Flow-Based Networking,” pp. 1-4 (2017). |
“Dynamically Reconfigurable Optical-Wireless Backhaul/Fronthaul with Cognitive Control Plane for Small Cells and Cloud-RANs: D3.1 Analysis of state of the art on scalable control plane design and techniques for user mobility awareness. Definition of 5G-XHaul control plane requirements,” European Commission, 5G-XHaul, pp. 1-107 (Jun. 31, 2016). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Domain Name System Procedures; Stage 3 (Release 13),” 3GPP TS 29.303 V13.4.0, pp. 1-69 (Jun. 2016). |
“Multi-Layer Security Protection for Signaling Networks,” Oracle Communications, Oracle white paper, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 2016). |
Kantola et al., “Policy-based communications for 5G mobile with customer edge switching,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 9, pp. 3070-3082 (2016). |
Fielding et al. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content”, Internet Engineering Taskforce (IETF) Request for Comments: 7231, IEFT RFC 7231, pp. 1-102 (Jun. 2014). |
Abley et al., “A Mechanism for Remote-Triggered DNS Cache Flushes (DNS Flush),” Network Working Group, Google, pp. 1-12 (Jun. 24, 2013). |
Preston-Werner, “Semantic Versioning 2.0.0”, Oracle, pp. 1-5 (Jun. 2013). |
“LTE and Beyond,” https://ytd2525.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/lte-and-beyond/, 3 pages (2013). |
Fajardo et al., “Diameter Based Protocol,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6733, pp. 1-152 (Oct. 2012). |
Gulbrandsen et al., “A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV),” RFC 2782, pp. 1-12 (Feb. 2000). |
Nichols et al., “Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Network Working Group Request for Comments (RFC) 2474, The Internet Society, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 1998). |
Notice of Publication for International Application Serial No. PCT/US2020/061885 (dated Jun. 3, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 17/001,599 (dated May 17, 2021). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 16/555,817 (dated Dec. 3, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/102,404 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Policing Access Point Name-Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate (APN-AMBR) Across Packet Data Network Gateway Data Plane (P-GW DP) Worker Instances,” (filed Sep. 23, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,794 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Preferred Network Function (NF) Location Routing Using Service Communications Proxy (SCP),” (filed Jul. 31, 2020). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,021 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Diameter-Peer-Wide Egress Rate Limiting at Diameter Relay Agent (DRA),” (filed Nov. 27, 2019). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,955 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Producer Network Function (NF) Service Instance Wide Egress Rate Limiting at Service Communication Proxy (SCP),” (filed Jun. 26, 2019). |
Nichols et al., “Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IEFT) Netwok Working Group Request for Comments (RFC) 2474, The Internet Society, pp. 1-20 (Dec. 1998). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Procedures for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.502, V16.7.1, pp. 1-603 (Jan. 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; System architecture for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 23.501, V16.7.0, pp. 1-450 (Dec. 2020). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services; Stage 3 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V17.0.0, pp. 1-229 (Dec. 2020). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/082,871 (dated Jun. 6, 2022). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,725 (dated Jun. 13, 2022). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; 5G System; Network Function Repository Services, Stage 3 (Release 16),” 3GPP TS 29.510, V16.6.0, pp. 1-227 (Jan. 2021). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2022/019848 (dated Jun. 14, 2022). |
Advisory Action and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,794 (dated May 20, 2022). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,794 (dated Feb. 8, 2022). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/082,871 (dated Feb. 7, 2022). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/356,461 for “Methods, Systems and Computer Readable Media for Optimizing Network Traffic Distribution using Timeslot-Based Tracked Producer Network Function (NF) Performance During Producer NF Selection” (Unpublished, filed Jun. 23, 2021). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Procedures for the 5G System (5GS); Stage 2 (Release 17),” 3GPP TS 23.502, V17.0.0, pp. 1-646. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220295384 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |