The subject matter described herein relates to user controlled policy sharing. More specifically, the subject matter relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for user controlled policy sharing.
As telecommunication technology evolves, an increasing number of applications are available to users. Many of these applications (e.g., video on demand) utilize substantial network resources, particularly bandwidth. The utilization of such applications creates an ever increasing demand on the limited resources of telecommunications providers. In order to manage such resource demands, telecommunications providers often employ network policies to limit resource utilization. Employing a policy scheme allows a network provider to offer its most demanding users, who may be willing to pay greater service charges, the high quality of service (QoS) required by such resource-hungry applications. Additionally, policy schemes may help to ensure reliable service for all network users, who absent such policy schemes, might be adversely affected by the disproportionate utilization of network resources by users of such resource-hungry applications.
Another problem with existing network architectures is that there is no mechanism for user controlled sharing of policy attributes. For example, one user may have reserved but unused network bandwidth. There is currently no mechanism for the user to initiate sharing of the unused bandwidth with another user.
Accordingly, a need exists for methods, systems, and computer readable media for user controlled policy sharing.
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a method for user controlled policy sharing. The method includes receiving, from a first user device, a request to share with a second user device a policy attribute associated with the first user device. The method also includes generating a signaling message containing instructions to modify the policy attribute. The method further includes communicating the signaling message to a policy control function associated with the second user device.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a system for user controlled policy sharing. The system includes a communication interface. The system also includes a policy sharing module. The policy sharing module is configured to receive, from a first user device and via the communication interface, a request to share with a second user device a policy attribute associated with the first user device. The policy sharing module is also configured to generate a signaling message containing instructions to modify the policy attribute. The policy sharing module is further configured to communicate, via the communication interface, the signaling message to a policy control function associated with the second user device.
As used herein, the term “node” refers to a physical computing platform including one or more processors and memory.
As used herein, the terms “function” or “module” refer to software in combination with hardware (such as a processor) and/or firmware for implementing features described herein.
The subject matter described herein can be implemented in software in combination with hardware and/or firmware. For example, the subject matter described herein may be implemented in software executed by one or more processors. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
The subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
Methods, systems, and computer readable media for user controlled policy sharing are provided.
Network environment 100 may include one or more carrier networks. For example, network environment 100 may include carrier network 114. Carrier network 114 may include one or more bearer binding and event reporting function (BBERF) nodes, which may coordinate delivery of data to and from UE(s), and may be, for example, a service gateway (SGW) or a serving general packet radio service (GPRS) support node (SGSN). For example, carrier network 114 may include BBERF nodes 116 and 118, which may respectively coordinate delivery of data to and from UE 102 and UE 104. Carrier network 114 may include one or more policy control function nodes, which may be, for example, resource admission control subsystem (RACS) nodes and/or policy and charging rules function (PCRF) nodes. PCRF nodes may serve as central policy decision points within network environment 100 and may aid one or network operators associated with network environment 100 in making real-time, subscriber specific, policy decisions that may be utilized to provide varying levels of QoS. For example, carrier network 114 may include PCRF nodes 120 and 122, which may serve as central policy decision points within network environment 100 for UE 102 and UE 104. In some embodiments, PCRF node 120 may serve as the policy control function for UE 102 and UE 104. In some embodiments, PCRF node 120 may serve as the policy control function for UE 102 and PCRF node 122 may serve as the policy control function for UE 104.
As policy decision points for carrier network 114, PCRF nodes 120 and/or 122 may take operator defined service policies, subscription information pertaining to a user, and other data into account to build policy decisions. Policy decisions may be formulated as policy control and charging (PCC) rules, for example, Gx rules contained in credit control messages. PCC rules may contain information about user plane traffic expressed as a service data flow (SDF) or packet filter. A packet filter may take the form of an Internet protocol (IP) five-tuple specifying: (1) source IP address(es), (2) destination IP address(es), (3) source port number(s), (4) destination port number(s), and (5) application protocol(s) (e.g., transmission control protocol (TCP), user datagram protocol (UDP)). All IP packets matching a packet filter of a PCC rule may be designated an SDF.
Flow-based charging models may provide operators associated with network environment 100 with the ability to gate (e.g., allow/block), charge, or vary QoS for SDFs identified by SDF filters according to specified policy control and charging rules. PCC rules may contain information that allows the filtering of traffic to identify packets belonging to a particular SDF (e.g., IP multimedia subsystem (IMS), file transfer protocol (FTP), browsing) and allow an operator to define how a particular SDF is to be charged (e.g., different media streams within a single packet data protocol (PDP) context.) PCC rules may be requested by a policy and charging enforcement function (PCEF) node (e.g., by a packet data network (PDN) gateway in an evolved packet system (EPS)), at bearer establishment, upon a specified trigger event, and/or upon bearer termination. Such a request may be made using a Gx reference point towards a PCRF. PCC rules may specify one or more QoS policy attributes, for example, a guaranteed download bit rate, a minimum download bit rate, a maximum download bit rate, a permitted SDF, a permitted QoS class, a permitted access point name (APN), a permitted destination IP address, and a download quota.
Carrier network 114 may include one or more policy enforcement function nodes, which may be PCEF nodes, and may be placed in line between one or more access networks and one or more PCRF nodes. For example, carrier network 114 may include PCEF nodes 124 and 126, which may respectively be placed in line between access networks 106 and 108 and PCRF nodes 120 and 122. PCEF nodes 124 and 126 may be, for example, gateway GPRS support nodes (GGSN) or PDN gateways. As policy enforcement points, PCEF nodes 124 and 126 may request and receive policy rules from PCRF nodes 120 and 122 via, for example, the Gx interface.
In accordance with embodiments of the subject matter described herein, carrier network 114 may include a policy sharing module for user controlled policy sharing. In some embodiments, a policy sharing module may be included as part of a policy sharing application function (AF) node. For example, carrier network 114 may include policy sharing AF node 128 for user controlled policy sharing. In some embodiments, a policy sharing module may be included as part of one or more policy control function nodes. For example, PCRF node 120 and/or PCRF node 122 may include a policy sharing module for user controlled policy sharing. In some embodiments, a policy sharing module may be operative to communicate with one or more of a subscription profile repository (SPR), a subscription binding repository (SBR), and a home subscriber server (HSS), any of which may contain information that may be utilized to identify a policy control function associated with a particular subscriber or UE node. For example, carrier network 114 may include SPR/SBR/HSS node 130 and one or more of policy sharing AF node 128, PCRF node 120, and PCRF node 122 may be operative to communicate with SPR/SBR/HSS node 130 to obtain information that may be utilized to identify a policy control function associated with UE 102 and/or UE 104.
In accordance with embodiments of the subject matter described herein, a user of network environment 100 may utilize a policy sharing module to share a policy attribute (e.g., SDF gating policy attribute, QoS policy attribute, charging policy attribute, etc.) with another user of network environment 100. For example, UE 102 may be associated with a policy that provides a guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from a specific provider (e.g., a premium subscription). A user of UE 102 may desire to share a video from the specified provider with a user of UE 104. UE 104, however, may not be associated with a policy that provides guaranteed minimum bandwidth, and thus may be unable to view the video either entirely or in a satisfactory manner. Accordingly, the user of UE 102 may desire to “share” a policy attribute associated with UE 102 (e.g., the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider) with UE 104, enabling UE 104's user to view the video in a satisfactory manner. In accordance with embodiments of the subject matter described herein, UE 102's user may utilize a policy sharing module to share such a policy attribute with UE 104.
At step 2, the policy sharing module of policy sharing AF node 128 may generate and communicate to a policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCRF node 120) a signaling message instructing the policy control function to modify the policy attribute (e.g., to decrease the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102). At step 3, the policy sharing module of policy sharing AF node 128 may generate and communicate to a policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCRF node 120) a signaling message instructing the policy control function to modify the policy attribute (e.g., to increase the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104). In some embodiments, the policy sharing module of AF node 128 may be configured to generate the signaling message in response to having first determined that one or more of UE 102 and UE 104 are permitted to share the policy attribute. It is appreciated that the policy control function associated with UE 102 will not necessarily be the same as the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., UE 102 and UE 104 may be associated with distinct PCRF nodes). In some embodiments, the policy sharing module of policy sharing AF node 128 may take steps (not illustrated) to update accounting and/or billing records to reflect the requested policy share between UE 102 and UE 104.
The policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCRF node 120) may receive the signaling message and, at step 4, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) a PCC rule, via for example a re-auth request (RAR) message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for decreasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 5, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCRF node 120) an acknowledgement message, for example, a re-auth answer (RAA) message.
Similarly, the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCRF node 120) may receive the signaling message and, at step 6, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) a PCC rule, via for example an RAR message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for increasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 7, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCRF node 120) an acknowledgement message, for example, an RAA message. It is appreciated that the policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 need not be distinct from the policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., UE 102 and UE 104 may both utilize the same PCEF node).
The policy enforcement function(s) associated with UE 102 and UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 124 and PCEF node 126), having received PCC rules for modifying the policy attribute, may accordingly adjust the policy attribute for each of UE 102 and UE 104 as specified by the PCC rules (e.g., decrease the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102 and increase the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104), effectively “sharing” a policy attribute associated with UE 102 with UE 104.
The policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) may receive the signaling message and, at step 3, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) a PCC rule, via for example an RAR message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for decreasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 4, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) an acknowledgement message, for example, an RAA message.
Similarly, the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) may receive the signaling message and, at step 5, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) a PCC rule, via for example an RAR message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for increasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 6, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) an acknowledgement message, for example, an RAA message. It is appreciated that the policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 need not be distinct from the policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., UE 102 and UE 104 may both utilize the same PCEF node).
The policy enforcement function(s) associated with UE 102 and UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 124 and PCEF node 126), having received PCC rules for modifying the policy attribute, may accordingly adjust the policy attribute for each of UE 102 and UE 104 as specified by the PCC rules (e.g., decrease the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102 and increase the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104), effectively “sharing” a policy attribute associated with UE 102 with UE 104.
The policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) may receive the signaling message and, at step 7, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) a PCC rule, via for example an RAR message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for decreasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 8, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 102 (e.g., PCEF node 124) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 102 (e.g., the policy control function of PCRF node 120) an acknowledgement message, for example, an RAA message.
Similarly, the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCRF node 122) may receive the signaling message and, at step 9, may generate and communicate to a policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) a PCC rule, via for example an RAR message, that modifies the policy attribute (e.g., a rule for increasing the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104). In some embodiments the PCC rule may be configured to expire after a predetermined time period. At step 10, the policy enforcement function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 126) may acknowledge receiving the PCC rule by generating and communicating to the policy control function associated with UE 104 (e.g., PCRF node 122) an acknowledgement message, for example, an RAA message.
The policy enforcement function(s) associated with UE 102 and UE 104 (e.g., PCEF node 124 and PCEF node 126), having received PCC rules for modifying the policy attribute, may accordingly adjust the policy attribute for each of UE 102 and UE 104 as specified by the PCC rules (e.g., decrease the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 102 and increase the guaranteed minimum bandwidth for streaming video from the specified provider for UE 104), effectively “sharing” a policy attribute associated with UE 102 with UE 104.
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation, as the subject matter described herein is defined by the claims as set forth hereinafter.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/390,159, filed Oct. 5, 2010; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3917915 | Karras | Nov 1975 | A |
4162377 | Mearns | Jul 1979 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4385206 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1983 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756020 | Fodale | Jul 1988 | A |
4769834 | Billinger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788718 | McNabb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4897835 | Gaskill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897870 | Golden | Jan 1990 | A |
4959849 | Bhusri | Sep 1990 | A |
4972461 | Brown et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315580 | Phaal | May 1994 | A |
5341608 | Mains, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5402474 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5426688 | Anand | Jun 1995 | A |
5430709 | Galloway | Jul 1995 | A |
5438570 | Karras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457692 | Ishinabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457729 | Hamann et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473596 | Garafola et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521902 | Ferguson | May 1996 | A |
5539804 | Hong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546398 | Tucker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550914 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598464 | Hess et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602909 | Carkner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606600 | Elliott | Feb 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610977 | Williams et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625681 | Butler, II | Apr 1997 | A |
5689555 | Sonnenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
5696816 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740239 | Bhagat et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757895 | Aridas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764745 | Chan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768352 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768358 | Venier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771284 | Sonnenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784443 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796813 | Sonnenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5802145 | Farris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867558 | Swanson | Feb 1999 | A |
5903726 | Donovan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009160 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1999 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028914 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108332 | Kasiviswanathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111946 | O'Brien | Aug 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134307 | Brouckman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134316 | Kallioniemi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208872 | Schmidt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249572 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321268 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393269 | Hartmaier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424621 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438223 | Eskafi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453158 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456708 | Copley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466796 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480588 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496690 | Cobo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510164 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535727 | Abbasi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584183 | Manto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633764 | Garcia | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6856676 | Pirot et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6963583 | Foti | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7738891 | Tenhunen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8305922 | Cuervo | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331229 | Hu et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8620263 | Ravishankar et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8681622 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020029189 | Titus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020111153 | Hartmaier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150079 | Zabawskyj et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030203740 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fujimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213393 | Bedingfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233840 | Bye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240638 | Donovan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060053197 | Yoshimura et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060291488 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070185809 | Duan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090207730 | Stamoulis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225719 | Zhi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245108 | Wu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090327112 | Li et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100137002 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161802 | Tofighbakhsh et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100184403 | Cai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287121 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110003579 | Cai et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110158090 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170411 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170412 | Ramadas et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208853 | Castro-Castro et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217979 | Nas | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231540 | Tai et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246586 | Steele | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307790 | Pandya et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317557 | Siddam et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120026947 | Miller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034900 | Agarwal | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052866 | Froehlich et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059943 | Castro et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094685 | Marsico | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096139 | Cackowski et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099715 | Ravishankar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100849 | Marsico | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120129488 | Patterson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140632 | Norp et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163297 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176894 | Cai et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120220330 | Goldner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233325 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120257499 | Chatterjee et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130017803 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036215 | Kupinsky et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 088 639 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 212 654 | May 1987 | EP |
0 258 654 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 264 023 | Apr 1988 | EP |
1 100 279 | May 2001 | EP |
2 382 267 | May 2003 | GB |
WO 8401073 | Mar 1984 | WO |
WO 8603915 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8800419 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0120920 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2006031678 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2012021344 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2013126057 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 (May 10, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,936 (May 1, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/277,626 (Feb. 27, 2013). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 9), ” 3GPP TS 32.299 V9.4.0, pp. 1-148 (Jun. 2010). |
3GPP, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Universal Subscriber Identity Module (USIM) Application Toolkit (USAT) (3GPP TS 31.111 version 8.3.0 Release 8),” ETSI TS 131 111 V8.3.0, pp. 1-102 (Oct. 2008). |
“BICC Architecture and BICC Protocol Details,” Tekelec, p. 28-41 (2008). |
“BICC Signaling Router (BSR) Reference Architecture (WP005274),” Tekelec, p. 2-91 (2008). |
Jennings et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) URIs for Application such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR),” The Internet Society, RFC 4458 (Apr. 2006). |
“Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol or ISDN User Part,” ITU-T Q. 1912.5, p. 1-101 (Mar. 2004). |
“Prepaid vs. Number Portability,” Power Point presentation (publication date unknown; electronic file creation date Jul. 29, 2003). |
“Bearer Independent Call Bearer Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1950, p. 1-96 (Dec. 2002). |
Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 2002). |
Marshall et al., “SIP Extensions for Supporting Distributed Call State,” SIP Working Group, Internet Draft, pp. 1-12 (Aug. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part: Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.1902.3, p. 1-141 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signaling System No. 7 ISDN user part: General Functions of Messages and Parameters,” ITU-T Q.1902.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.1902.1, p. 1-23 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1901 (Jun. 2000). |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 10, 2000). |
Liao et al., “SS7-TCAP/IP Interworking,” Internet Engineering Task Force, pp. 1-14 (Mar. 1999). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, p. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Mobile Wireless Overview,” Cisco IOS Mobile Wireless Configuration Guide, pp. MWC-1-MWC-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief for U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 (Dec. 30, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,936 (Nov. 15, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/330,086 (Nov. 6, 2013). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 (Sep. 19, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/277,626 (Aug. 20, 2013). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2012/026178 (Jul. 30, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Application No. PCT/US12/26178 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Network Metadata Based Policy Control,” (Unpublished, filed Feb. 22, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,756 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Network Metadata Based Policy Control,” (Unpublished, filed Feb. 22, 2012). |
“About 3GPP: What is the difference between a SIM and a USIM? What is a UICC?,” About http://www.3gpp.org/FAQ#outil—sommaire—58, pp. 1-11 (Copyright 2012). |
“Smart Cards; Card Application Toolkit (CAT) (Release 10),” ETSI TS 102 223 V10.5.0, pp. 1-224 (Sep. 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Universal Geographical Area Description (GAD) (Release 10),” 3GPP TS 23.032, pp. 1-29 (Mar. 2011). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Rx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.214 V9.3.0, pp. 1-44 (Mar. 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control over Gx reference point (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.212 V9.2.0, pp. 1-111 (Mar. 2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120084371 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61390159 | Oct 2010 | US |