The subject matter described herein relates to providing services to bearer traffic. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to methods, systems, and computer readable media for using policy knowledge of or obtained by a PCRF for needs based forwarding of bearer session traffic to network nodes.
In packet networks, packets originating from a mobile device, such as a mobile handset, have to pass through many network nodes hosting different applications before reaching the Internet or other transit network. For example, packet data originating from a mobile device may pass through an e-node B, a signaling gateway (SGW), a packet gateway (PGW), a deep packet inspection device (DPI), a video over packet (VoP) device, and a content filter before reaching the Internet. Packet delay increases with each network node in the bearer path. In addition, each network node must be scaled to handle 100% of the bearer traffic even though only a portion of the bearer traffic needs its services. As a result of this scaling, the cost of each network node is increased.
Accordingly, in light of these difficulties, there exists a need for methods, systems, and computer readable media for using policy knowledge of or obtained by a PCRF for needs based forwarding of bearer traffic to network nodes.
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer readable media for using policy knowledge of or obtained by a policy and charging rules function (PCRF) for needs based forwarding of bearer traffic to network nodes. One exemplary system includes a PCRF. The PCRF includes a policy engine for identifying, using policy knowledge or obtained by the PCRF, zero or more network nodes hosting applications needed for processing packets of a bearer session. The PCRF further includes an application routing configurator for providing instructions to configure at least one configurable network element to forward bearer session traffic to any of the network nodes determined to be needed for processing packets associated with the bearer session and to bypass any of the network nodes not determined to be needed for processing packets associated with the bearer session.
The subject matter described herein can be implemented in software in combination with hardware and/or firmware. For example, the subject matter described herein can be implemented in software executed by a processor. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein can be implemented using a non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with respect to the accompanying drawings, of which:
The subject matter described herein includes methods, systems, and computer readable media for using policy knowledge of or obtained by a PCRF for needs based forwarding of bearer session traffic to network nodes.
In light of these difficulties, a system that uses policy knowledge of or obtained by a PCRF to dynamically configure a network switch, router, application, or other network entity to forward bearer session traffic to one or more of network nodes 108, 110, and 112 on an as needed basis is provided.
As stated above, policy engine 202 may determine which network nodes should receive traffic for a given bearer session using policy knowledge stored or obtained by PCRF 200. For example, when e-node B 102 or other network element initiates a session, the policy charging and enforcement function associated with the session initiating network element must consult PCRF 200 to determine what policy to apply to the session. PCRF 200, using policy engine 202, identifies the subscriber associated with the bearer session, accesses stored policy rules associated with the subscriber and bearer session type, determines, using the policy rules for the subscriber and bearer session type, that one or more of network nodes 108, 110, and 112 may be required for a given session. The policy rules may be stored within memory of the PCRF or within memory of a node accessible by the PCRF. One example of an external node accessible by the PCRF that may store policy rules is a subscription profile repository (SPR). Another example of an external node accessible by the PCRF that may store policy rules is a home subscriber server (HSS). In the case where the policy rules are stored externally to the PCRF, the PCRF may query the SPR or the HSS to identify network nodes hosting applications needed to process packets for a session. If the policy rules are stored internally by the PCRF 200, policy engine 202 may query the policy database maintained by the PCRF to identify the network nodes hosting applications needed to process packets for the session.
Once PCRF 200 identifies the network node or nodes needed to processor packets for a given session, PCRF 200 may instruct the identified network nodes 108, 110, and 112 to look for packets associated with the session and also how to process packets for the session. Because PCRF 200 knows which of network nodes 108, 110, and 112 are needed for a given session, application routing configurator 204 may utilize this knowledge to configure one or more configurable network elements 206 to dynamically configure one or more configurable network elements to forward traffic for a given bearer session to needed network nodes and to bypass network nodes that are not needed for the session.
Because network nodes determined not to be needed for a bearer session are bypassed, packet delay is minimized by only bringing in the needed network nodes for each bearer session. Moreover, each network node only has to be scaled or designed to handle expected traffic, rather than all packet traffic. For example, 30% of the traffic may not need any additional processing and only flow through e-node B, SOW, and the PGW. 20% may need video optimization. 20% may need content filtering, and 30% may need DPI. PCRF 200 may, using policy knowledge, dynamically configure one or more configurable network elements to forward bearer session traffic to needed network nodes thereby implement these percentages. By dynamically steering session traffic to needed network nodes and bypassing unneeded network nodes, network efficiency is increased.
In one embodiment, application routing configurator 204 may be an OpenFlow controller and configurable network elements 206 may be OpenFlow compatible switches. The OpenFlow protocol is described in the OpenFlow Switch Specification, Version 1.1.0 Implemented (Wire Protocol 0×02), Feb. 28, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In order to dynamically configure one or configurable network elements to forward bearer session traffic to needed network elements, application routing configurator 204 may send OpenFlow flow table modification commands to network elements 206 to add or modify flow table entries in their flow tables so that packets in a session are forwarded to the network elements identified as needed for the session and so that the packets bypass network elements that are not identified as needed for the session. In one exemplary implementation where configurable network elements 206 are implemented by an OpenFlow switch, the OpenFlow switch may have a port corresponding to each of PCRF 200, PGW 106, DPI device 108, VoP device 110, content filter 112, and Internet 114. Each of network elements 108, 110, and 112 may be configured to forward packets received from the OpenFlow switch back to the OpenFlow switch after processing. Assume for illustrative purposes that a given session is determined to require processing by DPI device 108 and content filter 112 but not VoP device 110. In this example, PCRF 200 may configure the flow table or flow tables associated with the OpenFlow switch as illustrated in Table 1 below.
The flow table includes match fields that are compared to fields in ingress packets and instructions to execute for packets matching each combination of match fields. If the ingress port corresponds to PGW 106, and the session ID is IP1 (or other session identifying parameters), the instruction is to output the packets to the port associated with the DPI. Thus, ingress packets for session IP1 received from PGW 106 will be forwarded to DPI device 108. Assuming DPI device 108 is configured to forward packets back to the OpenFlow switch, according to the flow table, the packets received on the ingress port that corresponds to the DPI having the session ID IP1 will be output to the port associated with the content filter. Assuming that the packets pass the content filter and are forwarded back to the OpenFlow switch, according to the next flow table entry, packets received on the ingress port associated with the content filter having the session ID IP1 will be output to the Internet. Thus, using the dynamically configured flow table illustrated above, packets associated with the session identified by IP1 are processed by the DPI and the content filter but not the VoP device. Such dynamic configuration of network forwarding or routing to forward traffic to only the needed network nodes using the policy knowledge of the PCRF reduces the need to over-engineer network nodes to handle traffic that the nodes are not required to process.
It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter may be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7522517 | Johnson | Apr 2009 | B1 |
8665717 | Kotecha et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9298515 | McMurry et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9369390 | Bantukul et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9391897 | Sparks et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9398492 | Deo | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020091810 | Hundscheidt et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040199632 | Romero et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20090232011 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090327079 | Parker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100080172 | Jin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103861 | Ulupinar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110090900 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110131332 | Bouazizi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110200053 | Kanode et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202676 | Craig et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120123870 | Denman et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140665 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158994 | McNamee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120300615 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303835 | Kempf et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130003745 | Nishimura | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044645 | Castro Castro et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064093 | Ridel et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086279 | Archer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130173810 | Subramaniam | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130188489 | Sato | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130223219 | Mir et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250770 | Zou et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130343295 | Deo | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140059678 | Parker | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140105039 | McDysan | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105140 | Guo | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140172739 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189137 | Castro Castro et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192646 | Mir et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193154 | Graham et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233389 | Bantukul et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237111 | McMurry et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140304416 | Khasnabish | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310388 | Djukic et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140348068 | Morper et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150036505 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150149656 | McMurry et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-2009-0033968 | Apr 2009 | KR |
10-2012-0055955 | Jun 2012 | KR |
10-2012-0059542 | Jun 2012 | KR |
WO 2011161575 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012055446 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012063106 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012130264 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2012149954 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2012160465 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013188665 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014127346 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014127347 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2015017422 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2015080906 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Introduction to Evolved Packet Core; Alcatel-Lucent, 2009;Strategic White Paper. |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Providing Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF) with Integrated Openflow Controller,” (Unpublished, filed Jun. 13, 2013). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 23.203 V9.3.0 (Dec. 2009). |
“OpenFlow Switch Specification,” Version 1.1.0 Implemented (Wire Protocol 0x02), www.openflow.org, pp. 1-56 (Feb. 28, 2011). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Application No. PCT/US14/66240 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Diameter Routing Using Software Defined Network (SDN) Functionality,” (Unpublished, filed Nov. 18, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2014/048644 (Oct. 17, 2014). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Application No. PCT/US14/48644 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Mitigating Traffic Storms,” (Unpublished, filed Jul. 29, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2014/016853 (Jun. 6, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2014/016860 (Jun. 4, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2014/011551 (Apr. 28, 2014). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2013/045652 (Sep. 17, 2013). |
Wendong et al., “Autonomicity Design in OpenFlow Based Software Defined Networking,” GC'12 Workshop: The 4th IEEE International Workshop on Management of Emerging Networks and Services, pp. 818-823 (Dec. 3, 2012). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 11),” 3GPP TS 23.203, V11.8.0 pp. 1-179 (Dec. 2012). |
Fajardo et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 6733, pp. 1-152 (Oct. 2012). |
“Software-Defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks,” ONF White Paper, Open Networking Foundation, pp. 1-12 (Apr. 13, 2012). |
“OpenFlow Switch Specification,” https://www.opennetworkin.org/images/stories/downloads/sdn-resources/onf-specifications/openflow/openflow-spec-v1.2.pdf, Version 1.2 (Wire Protocol 0x03), Open Networking Foundation, pp. 1-85 (Dec. 5, 2011). |
Chapman et al., “Software architecture definition for on-demand cloud provisioning,” Cluster Computing, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 79-100 Feb. 27, 2011). |
Dörnemann et al., “On-Demand Resource Provisioning for BPEL Workflows Using Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud,” 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pp. 140-147 (May 18, 2009). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 13804779.0 (Mar. 25, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 (Mar. 16, 2015). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/956,304 (Aug. 5, 2015). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 (Jul. 27, 2015). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2014/066240 (May 13, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/956,304 (May 4, 2015). |
“Split Architecture for Large Scale Wide Area Networks,” SPARC ICT-258457 Deliverable D3.3, pp. 1-129 (Dec. 1, 2011). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 (Mar. 28, 2016). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/956,304 (Mar. 16, 2016). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,864 (Feb. 17, 2016). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/956,304 (Feb. 1, 2016). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 13804779.0 (Jan. 19, 2016). |
Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief and AFCP 2.0 Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 (Jan. 14, 2016). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/092,898 (Jan. 14, 2016). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,864 (Dec. 16, 2015). |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,800 (Dec. 1, 2015). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14710682.7 (Nov. 25, 2015). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,800 (Nov. 10, 2015). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14703974.7 (Nov. 4, 2015). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/956,304 (Nov. 3, 2015). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/917,200 (Oct. 22, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/092,898 (Oct. 8, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,864 (Sep. 23, 2015). |
“LTE QoS: SDF and EPS Bearer Qos,” Netmanias, http://www.netmanias.com/en/post/techdocs/5908/eps-lte-qos-sdf/lte-qos-sdf-and-eps-bearer-qos, pp. 1-17 (Sep. 11, 2013, downloaded Apr. 8, 2015). |
Kempf et al., “Moving the Mobile Evolved Packet Core to the Cloud,” 2012 Fifth International Workshop on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Computing, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 8, 2012). |
Li Erran et al., “CellSDN: Software-Defined Cellular Networks,” ftp://ftp.cs.princeton.edu/techeports/2012/922.pdf, pp. 1-6 (Apr. 20, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/711,761 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Session Based Software Defined Networking (SDN) Management,” (Unpublished, filed May 13, 2015). |
Communication of European Publication Number and Information on the Application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14755208.7 (May 11, 2016). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140204796 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |