All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to methods and devices for treating heart failure. In particular, the present invention relates to methods and devices for treating heart failure by reducing elevated blood pressure in a heart chamber by creating a pressure relief shunt. Additionally, the present invention relates to methods and devices for customizing, adjusting or manipulating the flow of blood through the shunt in order to enhance the therapeutic effect of the pressure relief shunt.
Heart failure is a condition effecting millions of people worldwide. Heart failure includes failure of either the left side of the heart, the right side of the heart, or both. Left heart failure can lead to elevated pulmonary venous pressure, which may cause respiratory problems, including shortness of breath and exercise intolerance. Left heart failure may be ascribed to a number of causes, including valve disease, systolic failure of the left ventricle, and diastolic failure of the left ventricle. The adverse clinical result of each of these conditions is similar; the heart failure leads to elevated pressure in the left atrium and elevated pressure in the pulmonary veins, impeding proper flow of oxygenated blood through the blood supply. Therefore, there exists a need to treat the symptoms of left heart failure on the body.
Heart failure has been further classified as either systolic heart failure or diastolic heart failure. Diastolic heart failure refers to heart failure that is present without the presence of major valve disease even while the systolic function of the left ventricle is preserved. More generally, diastolic heart failure is failure of the ventricle to adequately relax and expand in order to fill with blood, causing a decrease in the stroke volume of the heart. Presently, there exist very few treatment options for patients suffering from diastolic heart failure. Therefore there exists a need for methods and devices for treating symptoms of diastolic heart failure.
Some types of pressure relief shunts have been used to treat the symptoms of diastolic heart failure. Examples of such types are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,043,360 and U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2011/0295366 A1. The long term effects of the creation of a pressure relief shunt can vary greatly depending on the amount of blood flow through the shunt. These effects can include the gradual development of hypertrophic pulmonary arteries for cases with significant left to right shunting. The hypertrophy of the pulmonary arteries in turn leads to worsening symptoms of heart failure. At the other end of the spectrum, the long term effect of the creation of a pressure relief shunt may include a gradual decrease in the amount of blood passing through the shunt such that the benefit of the procedure may be reduced or eliminated.
The hemodynamic conditions associated with diastolic heart failure are not static, and attempting to treat the disease with a static pressure relief shunt represents a deficiency in the prior art. For example, if a shunt is sized too large the short term effect of the creation of a pressure relief shunt may include a sudden worsening of heart failure. This phenomenon has been reported in similar procedures for heart failure patients and may be considered a type of rebound stress. Furthermore, if the pressure relief shunt is sized too small the patient may not experience any clinical improvement from the procedure. The size of the pressure relief shunt required for efficacious treatment of diastolic heart failure may be difficult to predetermine, and varies with the condition of the patient and with the state of the underlying disease. With these deficiencies in mind, there still exists a need, among other needs, for an adaptive means of treating diastolic heart failure by creating a clinically effective and safe pressure relief shunt.
Along those lines, deployment techniques exist for creating a pressure relief shunt in the atrial septum and then gradually allowing the shunt to open by slowly deflating a balloon which initially occludes the shunt. For example, the balloon may be gradually deflated over a period of hours our days. This treatment method and apparatus suffers from deficiencies. For example, the requirement to leave a balloon in place in order to gradually open the pressure relief shunt can create significant problems such as the problem of keeping the balloon in place despite the significant pressure differential across the shunt. Furthermore, the requirement to leave a catheter dwelling within the circulation carries significant potential risks, including increased risk of pulmonary embolism, sepsis, sensitization or allergic reaction, and other potentially adverse clinical reactions.
The constantly evolving nature of heart failure represents a significant challenge for the treatment methods currently disclosed in the prior art. Therefore, there is still a need for novel and adaptable methods and devices for treating diastolic heart failure by creating a pressure relief shunt which can be retrieved, repositioned, adjusted, expanded, contracted, occluded, sealed or otherwise altered as required to treat the patient. Furthermore, there exists a need for devices and methods for treating diastolic heart failure which can automatically self-adjust over time either in accordance with the gradual hemodynamic changes associated with heart failure or in anticipation of these changes.
In general, the present invention concerns treating heart disease by reducing both left atrial and pulmonary venous pressure. To this end, devices and methods are disclosed herein which may include the creation of a pressure relief shunt in the atrial septum or the placing of a device having a changeable hydraulic diameter into an already existing aperture in the atrial septum. Furthermore, devices and methods are disclosed herein which allow for adjusting the pressure relief shunt in response to the natural progression of the patient during the course of treatment. Additionally, devices and methods are disclosed which provide a treatment which may be adjusted to or which automatically adjusts to the changing conditions in the body as a result of the creation of the pressure relief shunt or the presence of the extant atrial septal aperture. Furthermore, devices and methods are disclosed herein which mitigate the risk of acute worsening of heart failure following the creation of a pressure relief shunt or of an extant atrial septal aperture by allowing for gradual increase in the hydraulic diameter of an implanted device after implantation. Devices and methods are disclosed herein which significantly mitigate the risk of later development of pulmonary hypertrophy by implanting a device which gradually decreases hydraulic diameter in size over time or in response to the natural hemodynamic changes in the heart.
In some embodiments of the present invention, an implantable shunting device is provided. The inventive device includes a pair of anchors, each comprising a plurality of segments, that are adapted to hold the device in place within a membrane wall, e.g. the atrial septum, and a shunting section adapted to permit fluid flow across the membrane wall first at first rate and then at a second rate at a later selectable time.
In some embodiments, the implantable shunting device is adapted to be manually adjusted to change the rate of fluid flow therethrough. For example, the inventive device may include an element which causes the hydraulic diameter of the shunting section to be manually alterable. Such elements may include a coil which may be incrementally wound, stretched, and/or compressed to selectively alter its hydraulic diameter. Such elements may include a tube that can be plastically deformed to alter its hydraulic diameter.
In some embodiments, the implantable shunting device is adapted to automatically change the rate of fluid flow therethrough. For example, the inventive device may have a first configuration which allows a predetermined flow rate to communicate from a high pressure region to a low pressure region across a membrane wall and be adapted to transform over a predetermined period of time into one or more other configurations in order to allow a different flow rate or different flow rates to communicate from the high pressure region to the low pressure region. The transformations may be gradual or may occur in discrete steps or may be a combination of gradual change with abrupt changes. The flow rate changes may be positive or negative or may alternate between the two.
In some embodiments, the implantable shunting device is to permit manual adjustment of the fluid flow rate through the device. For example, in some embodiments, the inventive device includes a hollow tubular body and a number of septal anchoring members, which anchor the inventive device to the atrial septum. The tubular body may be configured with an originally-deployed diameter (a first diameter) which may be expected to provide an efficacious treatment for an average patient. Alternatively, the first diameter of the tubular body may initially be undersized such that an effective treatment may be achieved in some subset of patients while the risk of acute worsening of heart failure following the implantation of the shunt is substantially decreased among all patients. The inventive device is further configured to be manually expanded or contracted by an adjustment device to second, third, fourth, . . . , etc. diameters (also referred to herein as “subsequent diameters”). The inventive device may include interlocking features which maintain the internal diameter that is set by the adjustment device. Alternatively, the tubular body of the inventive device may be made from an elastically deformable, heat setting, pressure-sensitive, or otherwise malleable material such that the diameter of the device remains stable after being set by the adjustment device.
In some embodiments, the inventive device includes an elongate tubular body, an internal member having an orifice, and a number of anchoring members for anchoring the tubular body to the atrial septum. The tubular body further includes an internal fastening feature which releasably clasps the internal orifice-containing shunt member. The internal orifice-containing member has an internal diameter which is configured to allow a therapeutic amount of blood to flow through the shunt. The internal member may be released from the fastening feature of the tubular body with a special retrieval tool and may then be repositioned or replaced with another internal shunt member. The replacement internal shunt member may feature a substantially larger or substantially smaller internal diameter, thus causing the device to have a different subsequent diameter than the first diameter. This replacement of the internal member may therefore be used to adjust the amount of blood flow through the shunt in order to respond to hemodynamic changes in the heart.
In some embodiments, the inventive device including a tubular body and a number of anchoring members is disclosed, where the tubular body may be configured such that its first diameter initially allows only a small volume of blood to shunt from the left atrium to the right atrium. The tubular body may then be designed to gradually expand over the course of days, weeks, or months, to subsequent diameters that allow a larger volume of blood to pass through the shunt. The shunt may be configured so that the internal portion or orifice will expand to a predetermined final subsequent diameter in order to allow a therapeutic amount of blood flow through the shunt. In such embodiments, the orifice of the inventive device may be configured to expand slowly so that the risk of acute worsening of heart failure that may be caused by a sudden hemodynamic change is substantially reduced.
In some embodiments, the inventive device includes a tubular body and a number of anchoring members and is configured to open to an internal diameter that allows sufficient blood to flow through the shunt in order to reduce the left atrial and pulmonary venous pressure. The tubular body may be configured such that over time the internal diameter of the shunt gradually contracts. The internal diameter of the inventive device may be designed to shrink to a predetermined final diameter. The predetermined final diameter may be sized to allow some clinically relevant blood flow through the shunt while simultaneously eliminating the risk of developing hypertrophic pulmonary arteries. Alternatively, the inventive device may be configured such that given enough time the internal diameter becomes completely occluded and blood flow through the shunt is prevented.
In some embodiments, the inventive device featuring a tubular body and a number of anchoring members may be configured to, at first, gradually open the first internal diameter of the shunt and then much later gradually close the subsequent internal diameter of the shunt. The gradual shrinking or expanding of the inventive device is used to control the amount of blood through the shunt in anticipation of the hemodynamic changes that occur over time due to the progression of heart failure and due to the creation of a pressure relief shunt. In still other embodiments the gradual opening or closing of the inventive device may include prolonged periods of static blood flow. For example, the inventive device may be implanted with a small diameter, then over time expand to a second larger diameter and remain there for some period of time. The delay may allow for additional testing or observation by health care personal. After the static delay period the inventive device may be allowed to further expand to a still larger third diameter.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the inventive device including a tubular body and a number of anchoring members may be implanted into an atrial septum. The tubular body of the inventive device includes an anchoring or clasping feature which can be used by a physician to close the inventive device if desired.
In some embodiment, an adjustable intra-atrial shunt includes a retainer having a plurality of struts and a plurality of apices joining the struts to form a generally cylindrical body having a left retaining flange and a right retaining flange, the tubular body adapted to fit within a wall of an atrial septum, the left retaining flange adapted to fit within a left atrium of a heart and the right retaining flange adapted to fit within a right atrium of a heart. The adjustable intra-atrial shunt also includes a removable and/or removable/replaceable insert for placement within the retainer, the insert comprising a generally tubular body having a longitudinal opening to allow a flow of blood from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart and a retrieval loop for removal of the insert from the retainer and the atrial septum, wherein the removable/replaceable insert and the opening allow a first rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart, and wherein the adjustable intra-atrial shunt is adapted to allow a second rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart by replacing the removable/replaceable insert with a second removable/replaceable insert having an opening of a different size.
In some embodiments, an adjustable, intra-atrial shunt includes a retainer having a plurality of struts and a plurality of apices joining the struts to form a generally cylindrical body having a left retaining flange and a right retaining flange, the tubular body adapted to fit within a wall of an atrial septum, the left retaining flange adapted to fit within a left atrium of a heart and the right retaining flange adapted to fit within a right atrium of a heart of a patient. This embodiment also includes a removable/replaceable insert for placement within the retainer, the insert comprising a plurality of flaps mounted on a generally cylindrical body having at least one opening to allow a flow of blood from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart, wherein the removable/replaceable insert and the at least one opening allow a first rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart when first implanted into a patient, and wherein the removable/replaceable insert is adapted to allow a second rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart after portions of the insert absorb into the patient.
In some embodiments, an adjustable, intra-atrial shunt includes a retainer having a plurality of struts and a plurality of apices joining the struts to form a generally cylindrical body having a left retaining flange and a right retaining flange, the tubular body adapted to fit within a wall of an atrial septum, the left retaining flange adapted to fit within a left atrium of a heart and the right retaining flange adapted to fit within a right atrium of a heart of a patient. This embodiment also includes a removable/replaceable insert for placement with the retainer, the insert comprising at least one flap mounted on a body having at least one opening to allow a flow of blood from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart, wherein the insert and the at least one opening allow a first rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart when first implanted into a patient, and wherein the insert is adapted to allow a second rate of blood flow from an area of high pressure of the heart to an area of low pressure of the heart after at least one portion of the insert absorbs into the patient.
In some embodiments, methods for treating diastolic heart failure are disclosed. The methods include implanting an inventive device into the atrial septum in order to decrease the left atrial and pulmonary venous pressure. The methods further include measuring the patient's hemodynamic status and heart failure indicators. Finally, the method includes adjusting the amount of blood flow through the inventive device in order to more effectively treat the heart disease. In some embodiments the methods for treating heart failure may include closing the inventive device, expanding the inventive device, collapsing the inventive device, or exchanging either the entire shunt or some components of the inventive device in order to increase the efficacy of the procedure.
The present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawing merely depict exemplary embodiments, they are, therefore, not to be considered limiting. It will be readily appreciated that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the drawings herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. It is to be kept in mind that each of the drawings presented herein is a schematic drawing that may only depict some of the features of the subject matter it is being used to describe.
Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and Figs. to provide an understanding of various embodiments. Those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments without one or more of the details described below. Further, while various processes are described herein with reference to steps and sequences, the steps and sequences of steps are not be understood as being required to practice all embodiments of the present invention.
Unless otherwise defined, explicitly or implicitly by usage herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as those which are commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this present invention pertains. Methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein may be used in the practice or testing of the present invention. In case of conflict between a common meaning and a definition presented in this document, latter definition will control. The materials, methods, and examples presented herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and Figs. to provide an understanding of various embodiments. Those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments without one or more of the details described below. Further, while various processes are described herein with reference to steps and sequences, the steps and sequences of steps are not be understood as being required to practice all embodiments of the present invention.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the term “embodiment” as used herein refers to an embodiment of the present invention.
Unless a different point of reference is clear from the context in which they are used, the point of reference for the terms “proximal” and “distal” is to be understood as being the position of a practitioner who would be implanting, is implanting, or had implanted a device into a patient's atrial septum from the right atrium side of a patient's heart. An example of a context when a different point of reference is implied is when the description involves radial distances away from the longitudinal axis or center of a device, in which case the point of reference is the longitudinal axis or center so that “proximal” refers to locations which are nearer to the longitudinal axis or center and “distal” to locations which are more distant from the longitudinal axis or center.
As used herein, the terms “subject” and “patient” refer to any animal, such as a mammal like livestock, pets, or humans. Specific examples of “subjects” and “patients” include, but are not limited, to individuals requiring medical assistance, and in particular, requiring treatment for symptoms of heart failure.
As used herein, the term “pressure differential” means the difference in pressure between two points or selected spaces; for example between one side of a flow control element and another side of the flow control element.
As used herein, the term “embolic particle” means any solid, semi-solid, or undissolved material, that can be carried by the blood and cause disruption to blood flow when impacted in small blood vessels, including thrombi.
As used herein, the terms “radially outward” and “radially away” means any direction which is not parallel with the central axis. For example, considering a cylinder, a radial outward member could be a piece of wire or a loop of wire that is attached or otherwise operatively coupled to the cylinder that is oriented at some angle greater than 0 relative to the center longitudinal axis of the cylinder.
As used herein, the term “axial thickness” means the thickness along an axis parallel to the center longitudinal axis of a shape or component.
As used herein, the term “axial direction” means direction parallel to the center longitudinal axis of a shape or component.
As used herein, a “sealable connection” is an area where components and/or objects meet wherein the connection defines provides for an insubstantial leakage of fluid or blood through the subject area.
As used herein, the term “lumen” means a canal, duct, generally tubular space or cavity in the body of a subject, including veins, arteries, blood vessels, capillaries, intestines, and the like.
As used herein, the term “sealably secured” or “sealably connected” means stably interfaced in a manner that is substantially resistant to movement and provides resistance to the flow of fluid through or around the interface.
As used herein the terms “bio-resorbable” and “bio-absorbable” refer to the property of a material that allows it to be dissolved or absorbed in a living body.
As used herein, the term “hydraulic diameter” means the overall flow rate capacity of a conduit taking into consideration the number and configuration of the inlets and outlets of the conduit.
As used herein, the terms “gradual” and “gradually” mean that something occurs over the course of time, either in a stepwise fashion or a continuous fashion. For example, the hydraulic diameter of an inventive device may gradually change in a step-wise fashion from an initial value to a later different value when an absorbable suture that initially restrains a geometrical change in the device breaks during its absorption and is no longer able to restrain the geometrical change. As another example, the hydraulic diameter of an inventive device may gradually change in a continuous fashion when an absorbable diaphragm having an initial orifice is continuously absorbed over time so that the diameter of the orifice continuously increases in diameter.
As used herein, the term “whole multiple” means the product contains no decimal.
It is to be understood that whenever relational numbers are used herein, e.g., “first,” “second,” etc., they are used for convenience of description and so they are to be interpreted with regard to the particular embodiment or claim in which they are presented, rather than as applying globally throughout this document to all embodiments or all claims. Thus, for example, in one embodiment it may be more convenient to use the term “first flange” to describe a flange that would be located in the right atrium when the device of that embodiment is implanted in an atrial septum, whereas it might be more convenient to use the term “first flange” in another embodiment to refer to refer to a flange that would be located in the left atrium when the implantable device of that embodiment is implanted.
It is to be understood that all flow rates are compared at identical the pressure differentials and fluid characteristics. Thus, whenever a device or a portion of a device is said to be adjustable from a first flow rate to a second flow rate, it is to be understood that the hemodynamic conditions under which those flow rates occur are identical to one another.
It should be appreciated that embodiments are applicable for use in other parts of the anatomy or for other indications. For instance, a device such as that described in this disclosure could be placed between the coronary sinus and the left atrium for the same indication. Also, a pressure vent such as is described in this disclosure could be placed between the azygous vein and the pulmonary vein for the same indication.
It is also to be appreciated that although liners or internal sheaths to assist in directly fluid flow through the inventive device are described below with regard to only some of the embodiments, the other described embodiments may be adapted to include the use of liners or internal sheaths.
The present invention may include a percutaneously deliverable device. In some embodiments, the device has a straightened, elongated, low-profile delivery configuration suitable for delivery via a delivery system. The device may have a generally radially expanded and sometimes shortened deployed profile. For example, it can have a distal anchoring portion positioned on the left atrial side of the septum, a right anchoring portion positioned on the right atrial side of the septum, and/or a shunt portion, sometimes referred to as a “core segment”, positioned through an aperture in the septum. The anchoring portions are sometimes referred to herein as “flanges”. A flange may be annular flanges. An annular flange may comprise a plurality of segments. It is to be understood that in some embodiments having right and left anchors that the anchors may be connected and in some embodiments they are integrally connected.
In some embodiments, when a device according to the present invention is deployed across a patient's atrial septum, the distal and proximal flanges are located left and right to the septum respectively. The core segment of the device creates a shunt or passageway allowing blood flow across the aperture. Generally, the left atrium has a higher pressure than the right atrium and the blood tends to flow from the left atrium across the shunt to the right atrium. The greater the cross-sectional size of the core segment at any point in time, i.e., its shunting size, the greater amount of blood flows from the left to right atria. The greater the amount of blood flows to the right atrium, the greater the left heart decompresses. The left atrial pressure can be measured directly with a catheter in the left atrium or indirectly by measuring the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during a right heart catheterization. The normal values of the mean left atrial pressure are typically in the range of 6-12 mmHg. The shunting size of the core segment of devices of the present invention may be tailored so that, during and post implantation, the left atrial pressure would reach the normal range of 6-12 mmHg. Thus for a DHF patient having a significantly elevated left atrial pressure, a device with a bigger shunting size should be used to restore the left atrial pressure to the normal range. For a DHF patient with a moderately elevated left atrial pressure, a device with a smaller shunting size should be used to restore the left atrial pressure.
The left atrial v-wave is the left atrial pressure at the end of an atrial diastole but immediately before the opening of the mitral valve. The left atrial v-wave represents the peak of the left atrial pressure. The size of the left atrial v-wave is determined partially by the amount of blood entering the left atrium. The normal range of left atrial v-wave is 6-21 mmHg. The shunting size of the core segment of the devices of the present invention may be tailored so that the left atrial v-wave would reach the normal range of 6-21 mmHg. Thus, for a DHF patient with significantly elevated left atrial v-waves, a device with a bigger shunting size can be used to restore the v-wave to the normal range. For a DHF patient with moderately elevated left atrial v-waves, a device with a smaller shunting size should be used to restore the v-wave to the normal range.
Systematic oxygen saturation is routinely monitored during a percutaneous implantation procedure. With the decompression of the left heart, the shunting size of the core segment of devices of the present invention may be tailored so that the systemic oxygen saturation level during and/or after an implantation procedure is maintained in the range of 75-100%. For a DHF patient with an elevated left atrial pressure, the higher the left atrial pressure elevation is prior to a treatment, the greater the shunting size should be used to maintain the systemic oxygen saturation level at a safe range; and the lower is the left atrial pressure elevation is prior to a treatment, the smaller the shunting size should be used to maintain the systemic oxygen saturation level at its safe range.
The ratio of pulmonary blood flow to systematic blood flow is defined as a Qp:Qs ratio. In a healthy heart, the Qp:Qs ratio is 1:1. In a DHF patient, Qp:Qs ratio is generally greater than 1:1. Some go beyond 2.5:1. The devices of the present invention can be used to restore the Qp:Qs ratio to or close to the normal range. Thus, the left-to-right flow produced by the device may be tailored so that the Qp:Qs ratio would at some time reach the acceptable range of 1:1 to 1.5:1.
The greater the left-to-right shunting flow which is generated by the device, the lesser amount of blood remains inside the left atrium and, later, enters the left ventricle. The smaller is the shunting flow, the greater amount of blood remains inside the left atrium and, later, enters the left ventricle. The normal values of mean left ventricle pressure are typically in the range of 40-80 mmHg. Thus, the shunting size of the core segment of the device may be tailored so that the left ventricle pressure would reach the normal range of 40-80 mmHg. For a DHF patient with a significantly elevated left ventricle pressure, a device with a bigger shunting size may be used to restore the left ventricle pressure to the normal range. For a DHF patient with a moderately elevated left ventricle pressure, a device with a smaller shunting size may be used to restore the left ventricle pressure to the normal range.
With the left-to-right shunting flow created by the device, the amount of blood inside the right atrium increases, which results in an elevated right atrium pressure. The greater the left-to-right shunting flow is, the greater is the amount of the blood that remains inside the right atrium, and in turn, the greater is the elevation in the right atrial pressure. The smaller the left-to-right shunting flow is, the lesser is the amount of the blood that remains inside the right atrium, and in turn, the lesser is the elevation in the right atrial pressure. The normal values of the mean right atrial pressure are typically in the range of 4-12 mmHg. Thus, the shunting size of the core segment of the device may be tailored so that the right atrial pressure would remain the range of 4-12 mmHg. Thus for a DHF patient with the right atrial pressure in the lower range, such as in the range of 4-6 mmHg, a device with a bigger shunting size can be used, and for a DHF patient with the right atrial pressure within the higher range, such as in the range of 10-12 mmHg, a device with a smaller shunting size should be used to prevent right atrium overload.
With the left-to-right blood flow created by the device, the amount of blood inside the right atrium increases, and the amount of blood entering into the right ventricle increases, which results in an elevated right ventricle peak systolic pressure. The greater is the left-to-right shunt, the greater is the amount of blood remains inside the right atrium, and in turn the greater is the amount of blood enters into the right ventricle, and the greater is the elevation in the right ventricle peak systolic pressure. The lesser the left-to-right shunt, the lesser is the amount of blood remains inside the right atrium, and in turn the lesser is the amount of blood enters the right ventricle, the lesser is the elevation in the right ventricle peak systolic pressure. The normal values of the mean right ventricle peak systolic pressure are typically in the range of 20-40 mmHg. Thus, the core segment of the device may be tailored so that the right ventricle peak systolic pressure would not exceed the normal range of 20-40 mmHg. Thus for a DHF patient with the right ventricle peak systolic pressure within the lower range, such as in the range of 20-30 mmHg, a device with a bigger shunting size could be used; and for a DHF patient with the right ventricle peak systolic pressure within the higher range, such as in the range of 30-40 mmHg, a device with a bigger shunting size should be used in order to prevent right ventricle overload.
With the left-to-right blood flow created by the shunt device, the amount of blood remaining inside the right atrium increases, and in turn, the pressure difference between the right and left atrium decreases. The greater is the left-to-right shunt, the greater is the amount of blood remains insider the right atrium and the greater reduction in the pressure difference between the left and right atria. The smaller is the left-to-right shunting flow, the lesser amount of blood remains inside the right atrium and the lesser reduction is in the pressure difference between the left and right atria. The normal values for the pressure difference between the left and right atria are typically in the range of 2-10 mmHg. Thus, the shunting size of the core segment of the device may be tailored so that the pressure difference between the left and right atria would not exceed the range of 2-10 mmHg. Thus for a DHF patient with a pressure difference between the left and right within the lower range, such as in the range of 2-5 mmHg, a device with a bigger shunting size can be used. For a DHF patient with a pressure difference between the left and right atria within the higher range, such as in the range of 5-10 mmHg, a device with a smaller shunting size should be used in order to prevent right atrium overload.
The implant delivery catheter of
The crossing wire of
The dilation catheter of
Still referring to
Continuing to refer to
It is to be understood that the delivery catheter described with regard to
Referring now to
Still referring to
The conical tail of the interatrial shunt of
Referring now to
The layered construction of the tubular body of
Referring to
In embodiments the adjustment of the inventive device of
The deformable and adjustable inventive devices of
Turning now to
The tightly wound coil 601 of
The tightly wound coil 601 of
The interatrial shunt 201 of
The adjustment tangs 605, 607 of
In use a physician would advance the adjustment catheter into the internal diameter of the interatrial shunt. The adjustment catheter may be tracked over a wire which has been placed through the shunt and into the left atrium. The left side and right side adjustment tangs 605, 607 would then be engaged by the adjustment catheter using any of the above described engagement methods, including simply keying the tangs into a pair of slots. The left side adjustment tang 605 would be keyed into the inner shaft of the adjustment catheter while the right side adjustment tang 607 would be keyed into the outer shaft of the adjustment catheter. The left side adjustment tang 605 may be held stationary by the inner adjustment catheter shaft, while the outer adjustment catheter shaft would then be rotated by the user in the appropriate direction to unwind the coil 601 and increase the inner diameter of the shunt. Alternatively, the right side adjustment tang 607 may be held stationary by the outer adjustment catheter shaft while the left side adjustment tang 605 is rotated by the inner adjustment catheter shaft. In either case, the fastening features of the inventive device would be connected to the side of the shunt that is held stationary relative to the body. In this way the shunt is not simply rotated within the interatrial septum. In some embodiments the user may be able to reset the coil back to its initial configuration by axially stretching the tightly wound coil and thereby disengaging the one-directional ramps 603 and allowing the coil to wind or unwind as needed.
The adjustable interatrial inventive device of
Turning now to
The stent-like frame of may be made from a laser cut nitinol hypotube in a manner that is very similar to the manufacture of many stents. The laser cut nitinol hypotube may then be heat set to a predetermined final diameter. The heat set stent frame may then be stretch axially and then the suture knots tied around the eye-holes of the stent frame. The stent frame features sets off axially stiff members 709 (identified in
The bio-resorbable sutures of the devices of
Upon sufficient dissolution of the bio-resorbable restraints, the device shown in
Turning now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
While the foregoing description focused on embodiments that automatically adjust the flow rate through the shunt, the present invention also includes embodiments which the flow rate adjustment is made manually or a combination of manually and automatically. Some embodiments which may include automatic, manual, or a combination of automatic and manual rate adjustments are described below.
This disclosure concerns an adjustable shunt for allowing flow from an area of high pressure, such as a left atrium of a heart, to an area of lower pressure, such as a right atrium of a heart. As explained above, this device may help to relieve over-pressure and may aid in preventing hypertrophy in the affected blood vessels.
A closer and more detailed view of a shunt embodiment is disclosed in
The other portion of the adjustable shunt is the insert 17, which may be impermeable and may allow flow of blood or other fluid only through its central passage. Insert 17 includes an outlet 17a and an inlet 17c that is substantially similar to the outlet. The central portion 17b is generally tubular and not permeable to fluids, with an outer surface having a retention feature 17d for matching with the retention feature 15d of cage 15. Insert 17 may be formed from a polymer such as PTFE, UHMWPE, HDPE, polypropylene, polysulfone, or other biocompatible plastic.
Retention feature 17d may be a tab or a button for placing into a void or space of cage 15. It will be understood by those having skill in the art that the inner diameter or dimension of insert 17 determines blood flow from the higher pressure left atrium to the lower pressure right atrium of the patient into whom the shunt is implanted. It will also be understood that the cage 15 will be implanted first with the insert 17 later implanted into the cage. Both the cage and the insert have a removal feature 15e, 17e, such as a loop of suture or of a radiopaque material included into the retrieval loop. Examples of radiopaque materials may include a gold or platinum thread. A retrieval device, such as a snare or grasper, may be used to grasp the retrieval loop for removal from the patient or re-placement within the patient.
The retention feature is important because the insert will only control the flow of blood from an area of higher pressure to an area of lower pressure in the heart if it is retained in place. The retention feature is also important because it is this feature that allows the purposeful or intentional removal of the insert, so that the insert can be replaced with an insert of a lesser or greater diameter, depending on whether a lesser or greater amount of pressure relief is required for the patient. As noted above, the amount of relief, that is, the radius or hydraulic radius of the opening, may vary among patients and may vary in time for a given patient. Thus, a multi-part shunt, with inserts of different effective hydraulic diameters, may be used to allow relief to a patient. To be clear, it is to be understood that a multi-part shunt may include a plurality of inserts and one insert may be replaced by another in vivo as need be to achieve the desired flow rate for the patient. It is clearly a less traumatic surgical procedure to replace the insert described here than to implant the entire shunt, and in particular, to implant the cage. Once the cage has been implanted, subsequent procedures are accomplished more quickly and with less trouble to the patient. The inserts, for example, may have inner diameters from 0 to 15 mm, including inserts having inner diameters from 3 to 5 mm. This is the diameter of the flow path from a higher pressure area to a lower pressure area.
Another embodiment is depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
It is desirable that the inserts and cages be retrievable, as noted above with respect to the retrieval loops shown in
The above embodiments are useful for adjusting the diameter of the shunt, but while useful, each adjustment is fixed. Other embodiments are constructed so that the openings or orifices gradually increase or decrease over time. In the embodiment of
When insert 90 is first deployed, orifice 93 allows limited flow. Over time, material from the sutures will be absorbed gradually into the bloodstream. The sutures will become thinner and weaker, and the joint between any two of the flaps will become looser, allowing more blood flow. Some of the suture joints may use more sutures and some may use less, so that the weakening of the sutures increases gradually over time, rather than all at once. Accordingly, insert 90 will have an initially low flow of blood from an area of high pressure to low pressure, due to a small initial orifice. Later, as the sutures are biosorbed and the flap joints become looser, blood flow will increase. If more adjustment is needed, the insert 90 may be removed via retrieval loop 99 and replaced with another insert, such as one depicted in
The insert portion of another embodiment which utilizes an insert/cage combination is depicted in
In some embodiments, the insert may be easier to fabricate if the flow control portions are placed near an end, i.e., an outside of the insert, as shown in
Although the descriptions given above for the embodiments having inserts that the inserts were described as being removable, it is to be understood that the present invention also includes embodiments wherein the inserts are not removable. In some such embodiments, the inserts are permanently attached to the cage, and in still other embodiments what are described above as inserts are not inserts at all but are integral portions of the cage. It is also to be understood that in some embodiments, the first anchor, the second anchor, and the shunt are integrally connected.
In another embodiment, depicted in
While the invention has been disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention is not to be limited by the foregoing examples, but is to be understood in the broadest sense allowable by law.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
While embodiments have been disclosed and described in detail, it is understood that various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention is not limited by the foregoing examples, but is better understood by the claims below. All patents, published applications, and other documents identified herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties to the full extent permitted by law.
This application is continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/726,425, filed Dec. 24, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/579,426, filed Dec. 22, 2011, and of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/659,520, filed Jun. 14, 2012, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3837345 | Matar | Sep 1974 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4018228 | Goosen | Apr 1977 | A |
4373216 | Klawitter | Feb 1983 | A |
4491986 | Gabbay | Jan 1985 | A |
4655217 | Reed | Apr 1987 | A |
4705507 | Boyles | Nov 1987 | A |
5100423 | Fearnot | Mar 1992 | A |
5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
5171233 | Amplatz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5284488 | Sideris | Feb 1994 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5334217 | Das | Aug 1994 | A |
5413599 | Imachi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429144 | Wilk | Jul 1995 | A |
5433727 | Sideris | Jul 1995 | A |
5464449 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478353 | Yoon | Dec 1995 | A |
5488958 | Topel et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5556386 | Todd | Sep 1996 | A |
5556408 | Farhat | Sep 1996 | A |
5693090 | Unsworth et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702412 | Popov et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725552 | Kotula et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741297 | Simon | Apr 1998 | A |
5824071 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5846261 | Kotula et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5876436 | Vanney et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893369 | Lemole | Apr 1999 | A |
5944738 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964754 | Osypka | Oct 1999 | A |
6050936 | Schweich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059827 | Fenton | May 2000 | A |
6068635 | Gianotti | May 2000 | A |
6120534 | Ruiz | Sep 2000 | A |
6123682 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123715 | Amplatz | Sep 2000 | A |
6152937 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156055 | Ravenscroft | Dec 2000 | A |
6168622 | Mazzocchi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190353 | Makower et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193734 | Bolduc et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210338 | Afremov et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214029 | Thill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241678 | Afremov et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258119 | Hussein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286512 | Loeb et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334864 | Amplatz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355052 | Neuss et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355056 | Pinheiro | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357735 | Haverinen | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6383195 | Richard | May 2002 | B1 |
6391036 | Berg et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395017 | Dwyer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402777 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409716 | Sahatjian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440152 | Gainor et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454795 | Chuter | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468301 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468303 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527746 | Oslund et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572652 | Shaknovich | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579311 | Makower | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6599308 | Amplatz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6626936 | Stinson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638257 | Amplatz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645143 | Vantassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666885 | Moe | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699266 | Logan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712836 | Berg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719768 | Cole et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719934 | Stinson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6837901 | Rabkin et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866679 | Kusleika | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911037 | Gainor et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913614 | Marino et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6932837 | Amplatz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936058 | Forde et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6979343 | Russo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7033372 | Cahalan | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7037329 | Martin | May 2006 | B2 |
7044134 | Khairkhahan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7097653 | Freudenthal et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105024 | Richelsoph | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7144410 | Marino et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7226466 | Opolski | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7309341 | Ortiz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317951 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338514 | Wahr et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350995 | Rhodes | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7419498 | Opolski et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445630 | Lashinski et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473266 | Glaser | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485141 | Majercak et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7530995 | Quijano et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7611534 | Kapadia et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625392 | Coleman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658747 | Forde et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678123 | Chanduszko | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691144 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699297 | Cicenas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704268 | Chanduszko | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722629 | Chambers | May 2010 | B2 |
7758589 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7842026 | Cahill et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860579 | Goetzinger et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7871419 | Devellian et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7905901 | Corcoran et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7967769 | Faul et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976564 | Blaeser et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010186 | Ryu | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8021359 | Auth et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034061 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043360 | McNamara et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8048147 | Adams | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052750 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8157860 | McNamara et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163004 | Amplatz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172896 | McNamara et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8252042 | McNamara et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8303623 | Melzer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313505 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8361138 | Adams | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366088 | Allen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8398670 | Amplatz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8460372 | McNamara et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8696611 | Nitzan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696693 | Najafi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8740962 | Finch et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8745845 | Finch et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8747453 | Amplatz et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752258 | Finch et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8777974 | Amplatz et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778008 | Amplatz et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8864822 | Spence et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8882697 | Celermajer et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8951223 | McNamara et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8979923 | Spence et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005155 | Sugimoto | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9205236 | McNamara | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9445797 | Rothstein et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9681948 | Levi et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9724499 | Rottenberg et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20010027287 | Shmulewitz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010029368 | Berube | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010053932 | Phelps et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020033180 | Solem | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020077698 | Peredo | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082525 | Oslund et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082613 | Hathaway et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095172 | Mazzocchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120277 | Hauschild et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143289 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161424 | Rapacki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161432 | Mazzucco et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165606 | Wolf et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169377 | Khairkhahan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173742 | Keren et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177894 | Acosta et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183826 | Dorn et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030032967 | Park et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093072 | Friedman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125798 | Martin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040044351 | Searle | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078950 | Schreck | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087937 | Eggers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102719 | Keith et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102797 | Golden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111095 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133236 | Chanduszko | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143261 | Hartley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143262 | Visram et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143292 | Marino et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162514 | Alferness et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176788 | Opolski | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193261 | Berreklouw | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206363 | McCarthy et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220653 | Borg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236308 | Herweck et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243143 | Corcoran et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267306 | Blaeser et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015953 | Keidar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049692 | Numamoto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049697 | Sievers | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065507 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065546 | Corcoran et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065548 | Marino et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070934 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075655 | Bumbalough et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075665 | Brenzel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080400 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080430 | Wright et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096735 | Hojeibane et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113868 | Devellian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131503 | Solem | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137609 | Guiraudon | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137686 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148925 | Rottenberg et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159738 | Visram et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165344 | Dobak | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187616 | Realyvasquez | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050234537 | Edin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240205 | Berg et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251063 | Basude | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251187 | Beane et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267524 | Chanduszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273075 | Krulevitch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273124 | Chanduszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288722 | Eigler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004323 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009800 | Christianson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009832 | Fisher | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041183 | Massen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085060 | Campbell | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095066 | Chang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111704 | Brenneman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122646 | Corcoran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122647 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135990 | Johnson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136043 | Cully et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155305 | Freudenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184088 | Van Bibber et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210605 | Chang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217761 | Opolski | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224183 | Freudenthal | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241675 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241745 | Solem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247680 | Amplatz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253184 | Amplatz | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259121 | Osypka | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276882 | Case et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005127 | Boekstegers et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010851 | Chanduszko et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021739 | Weber | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027528 | Agnew | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038295 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043431 | Melsheimer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070088375 | Beane et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088388 | Opolski et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118207 | Amplatz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123934 | Whisenant et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129755 | Abbott et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168018 | Amplatz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185513 | Woolfson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197952 | Stiger | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198060 | Devellian et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209957 | Glenn et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225759 | Thommen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265658 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270741 | Hassett et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282157 | Rottenberg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015619 | Figulla et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033425 | Davis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033543 | Gurskis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039804 | Edmiston et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039881 | Greenberg | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039922 | Miles et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058940 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071135 | Shaknovich | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086168 | Cahill | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103508 | Karakurum | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109069 | Coleman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119891 | Miles et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125861 | Webler et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154250 | Makower et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154302 | Opolski et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154351 | Leewood et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161901 | Heuser et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172123 | Yadin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177381 | Navia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183279 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188880 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188888 | Adams et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215008 | Nance et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221582 | Gia et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228264 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249397 | Kapadia | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249612 | Osborne et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262592 | Jordan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269662 | Vassiliades et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312679 | Hardert et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018570 | Righini et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030495 | Koch | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054805 | Boyle | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054982 | Cimino | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054984 | Shortkroff et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062841 | Amplatz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076541 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082803 | Adams et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099647 | Glimsdale et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112050 | Farnan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112244 | Freudenthal | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112251 | Qian et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171386 | Amplatz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177269 | Kalmann et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187214 | Amplatz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209855 | Drilling et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209999 | Afremov | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234443 | Ottma et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264991 | Paul et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270840 | Miles et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100022940 | Thompson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023046 | Heidner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023048 | Mach | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023121 | Evdokimov et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030259 | Pavcnik et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030321 | Mach | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049307 | Ren | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051886 | Cooke et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057192 | Celermajer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063578 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094335 | Gerberding et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106235 | Kariniemi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114140 | Chanduszko | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121370 | Kariniemi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131053 | Agnew | May 2010 | A1 |
20100211046 | Adams et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249490 | Farnan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249491 | Farnan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268316 | Brenneman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274351 | Rolando et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298755 | McNamara et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305685 | Millwee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324588 | Miles et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004296 | Lutter et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022079 | Miles et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040374 | Goetz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071623 | Finch et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071624 | Finch et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087261 | Wittkampf et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093062 | Cartledge et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106149 | Ryan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130784 | Kusleika | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184439 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190874 | Celermajer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213364 | Davis et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218479 | Rottenberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257723 | McNamara | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270239 | Werneth | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295183 | Finch et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319806 | Wardle | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319989 | Lane et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120022427 | Kapadia | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120130301 | McNamara et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165928 | Nitzan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120265296 | McNamara et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289882 | McNamara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290062 | McNamara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290077 | Aklog et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130030521 | Nitzan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041359 | Asselin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130178784 | McNamara et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184634 | McNamara et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130231737 | McNamara et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253546 | Sander et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267885 | Celermajer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130281988 | Magnin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012181 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012368 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140194971 | McNamara | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140257167 | Celermajer et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277045 | Fazio et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277054 | McNamara et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150039084 | Levi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150119796 | Finch | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150148731 | McNamara et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160051800 | Vassiliades et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1218379 | Jun 1999 | CN |
1556719 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1582136 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1780589 | May 2006 | CN |
101035481 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101035488 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101292889 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101426431 | May 2009 | CN |
101579267 | Nov 2009 | CN |
1264582 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1480565 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1470785 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1849440 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2827153 | Jan 2003 | FR |
58-27935 | Jun 1983 | JP |
H02-277459 | Nov 1990 | JP |
2003530143 | Oct 2003 | JP |
WO9527448 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO9808456 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9842403 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO0115618 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO02094363 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2004019811 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2005048881 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005048883 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2006127765 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007054116 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007083288 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2008058940 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2010111666 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010129511 | Nov 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sugimoto et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/986,409 entitled “Devices and methods for retrievable intra-atrial implants,” filed Dec. 31, 2015. |
Forcucci et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/346,711 entitled “Retrievable devices for treating heart failure,” filed Nov. 8, 2016. |
Ad et al.; A one way valved atrial septal patch: A new surgical technique and its clinical application; The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery; 111; pp. 841-848; Apr. 1996. |
Althoff et al.; Long-term follow up of a fenestrated amplatzer atrial septal occluder in pulmonary arterial hypertension; Chest; 133(1); pp. 183-185; Jan. 2008. |
Atz et al.; Preoperative management of pulmonary venous hypertension in hypoplastic left heart syndrome with restrictive atrial septal defect; the American Journal of Cardiology; 83; pp. 1224-1228; Apr. 15, 1999. |
Bailey, Steven R.; Nanotechnology in prosthetic heart valves (presentation); 31 pgs.; 2005 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Bolling, Steven; Direct flow medical—My valve is better (presentation); 21 pgs.; Apr. 23, 2009. |
Cheatham, John P.; Intervention in the critically ill neonate and infant with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum; Journal of Interventional Cardiology; 14(3); pp. 357-366; Jun. 2001. |
Coselli, Joseph S.; No! Valve replacement: Patient prosthetic mismatch rarely occurs (presentation); 75 pgs.; Apr. 25, 2009. |
Design News; Low power piezo motion; retrieved from the Internet (http://www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=229053&dfpPParams=ht_13,aid_229053&dfpLayout=article); 3 pgs.; May 14, 2010. |
Gaudiani et al.; A philosophical approach to mirral valve repair (presentation); 28 pgs.; Apr. 24, 2009. |
Hijazi, Zayad M.; Valve implantation (presentation); 36 pgs.; May 10, 2007. |
Larios et al.; The use of an artificial foraminal valve prosthesis in the closure of interatrial and interventricular septal defects; Chest; 36(6); pp. 631-641; Dec. 1959. |
Leon, Martin B.; Transcatheter aortic valve therapy: Summary thoughts (presentation); 19 pgs.; Jun. 24, 2009. |
Ling et al.; Implantable magnetic relaxation sensors measure cumulative exposure to cardiac biomarkers; Nat Biotechnol; 29(3); pp. 273-277; Mar. 2011. |
McMahon, Jim; Piezo motors and actuators: Streamlining medical device performance; Designfax; Mar. 23, 2010; 5 pgs.; retrieved from the internet on Jul. 19, 2012 (http://www.designfax.net/enews/20100323/feature-1.asp). |
Merchant et al.; Advances in arrhythmia and electrophysiology; implantable sensors for heart failure; Cir Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 3; pp. 657-667; Dec. 2010. |
Moses, Jeffrey W.; The good, the bad and the ugly of transcatheter AVR (presentation); 28 pgs.; Jul. 10, 2009. |
O'Loughlin et al.; Insertion of a fenestrated amplatzer atrial sestosotomy device for severe pulmonary hypertension; Heart Lung Circ.; 15(4); pp. 275-277; Aug. 2006. |
Park et al.; Blade atrial septostomy: Collaborative study; Circulation; 66 (2); pp. 258-266; Aug. 1982. |
Pedra et al.; Stent implantation to create interatrial communications in patients with complex congenital heart disease; Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions; 47; pp. 310-313; Jan. 27, 1999. |
Perry et al.; Creation and maintenance of an adequate interatrial communication in left atrioventricular valve atresia or stenosis; The American Journal of Cardiology; 58; pp. 622-626; Sep. 15, 1986. |
Philips et al.; Ventriculofemoroatrial shunt: A viable alternative for the treatment of hydrocephalus; J. Neurosurg.; 86; pp. 1063-1066; Jun. 1997. |
Physik Instrumente; Piezo for Motion Control in Medical Design and Drug Research (product information); Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH & Co. KG; 22 pgs.; © Nov. 21, 2010. |
Roven et al.; Effect of compromising right ventricular function in left ventricular failure by means of interatrial and other shunts; Am J Cardiol.; 24(2); pp. 209-219; Aug. 1969. |
RPI Newswire; Implantable, wireless sensors share secrets of healing tissues; RPI Newswire; 1 pg.; Feb. 21, 2012; retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 18, 2012 (http://news.rpi.edu/update.do). |
Sambhi et al.; Pathologic Physiology of Lutembacher Syndrome; Am J Cardiol.; 2(6); pp. 681-686; Dec. 1958. |
Sommer et al.; Transcatheter creation of atrial septal defect and fontan fenestration with “butterfly” stent technique; Journal of the American college of Cardiology; 33(2); Suppl. A; 3 pgs.; Feb. 1999. |
Stone, Gregg W.; Transcatheter devices for mirral valve repair, surveying the landscape (presentation); 48 pgs.; Jul. 10, 2009. |
Stormer et al.; Comparative study of in vitro flow characteristics between a human aortic valve and a designed aortic valve and six corresponding types of prosthetic heart valves; Eur Surg Res; 8(2); pp. 117-131; 1976 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Trafton, Anne; Detecting whether a heart attack has occurred; MIT News; 3 pgs.; Feb. 14, 2011; retrieved from the internet Sep. 20, 2014 (http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2011/cardiac-implant-0214). |
Watterson et al.; Very small pulmonary arteries: Central end-to-side shunt; Ann. Thorac. Surg.; 52(5); pp. 1132-1137; Nov. 1991. |
Webber, Ralph; Piezo Motor Based Medical Devices; Medical Design Technology; 5 pgs.; Apr. 2, 2009; retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 19, 2012 (http://mdtmag.com/articles/2009/04/piezo-motor-based-medical-devices). |
Celermajer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/498,903 entitled “Apparatus and methods to create and maintain an intra-atrial pressure relief opening,” filed Sep. 26, 2014. |
Forcucci et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,544 entitled “Devices and methods for treating heart failure,” filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
Finch; U.S. Appl. No. 14/645,416 entitled “Devices and methods for treating heart failure,” filed Mar. 11, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160022423 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61579426 | Dec 2011 | US | |
61659520 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13726425 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14878710 | US |