A portion of the disclosure of this patent document and its figures contain material subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to computers and to communications and, more particularly, to processing data in a communications network.
2. Description of the Related Art
Manipulation of electronic data is important in computer networking and in communications. Often times electronic data must be manipulated for presentation at a client communications device. That is, the electronic data must be changed, formatted, or altered to suit the display characteristics, processing abilities, and/or storage capabilities of the client communications device. A handheld personal data assistant, for example, often requires that bandwidth-intensive electronic data, such as on-demand video, be scaled, color corrected, and/or otherwise manipulated for optimum presentation on the small display of the handheld personal data assistant. Heretofore, however, manipulation of electronic data was usually the responsibility of the client communications device—that is, the client communications device stores and utilizes one or more computer programs to manipulate incoming electronic data for presentation on the client communications device.
Locally manipulating electronic data, however, poses problems. As the electronic data is received, the client communications device must store the electronic data, process/manipulate the electronic data, and present the manipulated electronic data to the user. This process of storing, manipulating, and/or presenting the electronic data, however, often taxes the limited processing and storage capabilities of the client communications device. As both those skilled and unskilled recognize, when the processing and/or storage capabilities of the client communications device are overwhelmed, the audio/video presentation may “stumble” and degrade the user experience. Sometimes the client communications device even experiences a fault or failure when the processing and/or storage capabilities are overwhelmed. There is, accordingly, a need in the art for methods and systems of manipulating electronic data that reduce the need for locally-stored computer programs and that reduce the need for local processing requirements.
The aforementioned problems, and other problems, are reduced by a Analysis Module. This Analysis Module comprises methods, computer systems, computer programs, and computer program products that provide communications services. Each time a user requests communications service, the Analysis Module analyzes the available communications networks and their available network routing and bandwidth. This invention then determines a best-value scenario for providing the user's requested communications service. The term “best-value scenario,” as used herein, means the Analysis Module strives to maximize profit for a service provider given one or more constraints when providing the user's requested communications service. The term “best-value scenario,” for example, might mean the lowest cost routing arrangement. The term “best-value scenario,” however, might also mean the maximum profitability for the service provider and/or network operator. The term “best-value scenario” could also mean maximizing profit while still satisfying a Service Level Agreement. Once the best-value scenario is ascertained, the service provider provides the requested communications service according to the best-value scenario.
This invention discloses methods, systems, and products for providing communications services. One of the embodiments describes a method for providing communications services. This method receives a request for communications service. The request for communications service originates from a client communications device associated with a user and requests communications service from a service provider. An availability of at least one of i) a communications network operated by the service provider and ii) another communications network operated by another service provider is dynamically assessed in real-time. A best-value scenario of segmentation, dispersion, assemblage, and routing of electronic data is assessed to fulfill the request. The best-value scenario maximizes profitability for the service provider. The communications service is provided to fulfill the request according to the best-value scenario.
Other embodiments of this invention describe a system for providing communications services. The system includes a Analysis Module stored in a memory device, and a processor communicates with the memory device. The Analysis Module receives a request for communications service. The request for communications service originates from a client communications device associated with a user, and the request for communications service requests communications service from a service provider. The Analysis Module dynamically assesses in real-time an availability of at least one of i) a communications network operated by the service provider and ii) another communications network operated by another service provider. The Analysis Module ascertains a best-value scenario of segmentation, dispersion, assemblage, and routing of electronic data to fulfill the request, with the best-value scenario maximizing profitability for the service provider. The communications service is then provided to fulfill the request, and the communications service is provided according to the best-value scenario.
Other embodiments of this invention describe a computer program product. A computer-readable medium stores a Analysis Module. The Analysis Module receives a request for communications service. The request for communications service originates from a client communications device associated with a user, and the request for communications service requests communications service from a service provider. The Analysis Module dynamically assesses in real-time an availability of at least one of i) a communications network operated by the service provider and ii) another communications network operated by another service provider. The Analysis Module ascertains a best-value scenario of segmentation, dispersion, assemblage, and routing of electronic data to fulfill the request, with the best-value scenario maximizing profitability for the service provider. The communications service is then provided to fulfill the request, and the communications service is provided according to the best-value scenario.
Other systems, methods, and/or computer program products according to embodiments will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon review of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, and/or computer program products be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention are better understood when the following Detailed Description of the Invention is read with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
This invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. These embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those of ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, all statements herein reciting embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future (i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure).
Thus, for example, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the diagrams, schematics, illustrations, and the like represent conceptual views or processes illustrating systems and methods embodying this invention. The functions of the various elements shown in the figures may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing associated software. Similarly, any switches shown in the figures are conceptual only. Their function may be carried out through the operation of program logic, through dedicated logic, through the interaction of program control and dedicated logic, or even manually, the particular technique being selectable by the entity implementing this invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art further understand that the exemplary hardware, software, processes, methods, and/or operating systems described herein are for illustrative purposes and, thus, are not intended to be limited to any particular named manufacturer.
The client communications device 30 sends and receives data. When the client communications device 30 requires communications service, the term “communications service” means the client communications device 30 requests a data upload and/or a data download via a communications network. The term “data” includes electronic information, such as, for example, facsimile, electronic mail (e-mail), text, video, audio, and/or voice in a variety of formats, such as dual tone multi-frequency, digital, analog, and/or others. Additionally, the data may include: (1) executable programs, such as a software application, (2) an address, location, and/or other identifier of the storage location for the data, (3) integrated or otherwise combined files, and/or (4) profiles associated with configuration, authenticity, security, and others. The client communications device 30 may include any computer/communications device utilizing a microprocessor and/or a digital signal processor. The client communications device 30 may include, for example, a computer (laptop, desktop, tablet, server, and other computer systems), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a Global Positioning System (GPS) device, an interactive television, an Internet Protocol (IP) phone, a pager, and/or a cellular/satellite phone.
The Analysis Module 20 receives the request 32 for communications service. The client communications device 30 communicates the request 32 for communications service to the computer server 28, and thus the Analysis Module 20, via the communications network 22. The request 32 for communications service requests communications service from a service provider of the communications network 22. As the following figures illustrate, the Analysis Module 20 then determines a best-value scenario for providing the requested communications service. The term “best-value scenario,” as used herein, means the Analysis Module 20 strives to maximize profit for the service provider given one or more constraints when providing the requested communications service. The term “best-value scenario,” for example, might mean the lowest cost routing arrangement. The term “best-value scenario,” however, might also mean a maximum profitability for the service provider and/or network operator. The term “best-value scenario” could also mean maximizing profit while still satisfying a Service Level Agreement. Once the best-value scenario is ascertained, the requested communications service is provided according to the best-value scenario.
As
As
Each service provider then evaluates their available network routing, available bandwidth, and pricing. When each service provider receives the interrogation 34, each service provider determines whether the service provider can fulfill the user's request for communications (shown as reference numeral 32 in
The best-value scenario may reflect a Service Level Agreement 60. As
Now that the best-value scenario is ascertained,
The flowchart continues with
The Analysis Module (shown as reference numeral 20 in
The Analysis Module may also be physically embodied on or in any addressable (e.g., HTTP, I.E.E.E. 802.11, Wireless Application Protocol (WAP)) wireless device capable of presenting an IP address. Examples could include a computer, a wireless personal digital assistant (PDA), an Internet Protocol mobile phone, or a wireless pager.
While the present invention has been described with respect to various features, aspects, and embodiments, those skilled and unskilled in the art will recognize the invention is not so limited. Other variations, modifications, and alternative embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/330,779, filed Dec. 9, 2008, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,882,267, which is itself a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/720,587, filed Nov. 24, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,464,179, with both applications incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5752186 | Malackowski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771282 | Friedes | Jun 1998 | A |
5790176 | Craig | Aug 1998 | A |
5862471 | Tiedemann et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5970121 | Homayoun | Oct 1999 | A |
5978780 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
6002689 | Christie | Dec 1999 | A |
6016307 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058301 | Daniels | May 2000 | A |
6104718 | Christie | Aug 2000 | A |
6178170 | Duree | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6263358 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272343 | Pon et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285871 | Daniels | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6385198 | Ofek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421714 | Rai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456594 | Kaplan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519693 | Debey | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522883 | Titmuss et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535592 | Snelgrove | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567375 | Balachandran et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6606502 | Chung Kam Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6697806 | Cook | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6728267 | Giese et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738815 | Willis et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6772413 | Kuznetsov | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6836465 | Rajan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836652 | Arima et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6856963 | Hurwitz | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6917628 | McKinnin et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6934530 | Engelhart | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950847 | Harrisville-Wolff et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957226 | Attias | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978308 | Boden et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7043225 | Patel et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7065496 | Subbloie et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7155517 | Koponen | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7184548 | Wee et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7289489 | Kung et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7343416 | Hodges et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010014210 | Kang | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010029544 | Cousins | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020058532 | Snelgrove et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073182 | Zakurdauv et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087674 | Guilford | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112060 | Kato | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128948 | Wiesehuegel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138398 | Kalin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138418 | Zarin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146102 | Lang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164018 | Wee et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176378 | Hamilton | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030012376 | Wee | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043815 | Tinsley | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051054 | Redlich et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055723 | English | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088778 | Lindqvist | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093550 | Lebizay | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100315 | Rankin | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105726 | Itoh et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126610 | Ando | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143978 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156543 | Sahinoglu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200336 | Pal et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211856 | Zilliacus | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225677 | Sandholm et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233332 | Keeler et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019900 | Knightbridge et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028049 | Wan | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030681 | Shannon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040132449 | Kowarsch | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139208 | Tuli | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160932 | Yegoshin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040221053 | Codella et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249927 | Pezutti | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267686 | Chayes et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050025124 | Mitsumori et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038637 | Balakrishnan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060420 | Kovacevic | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094725 | Hui | May 2005 | A1 |
20060031515 | VanGassel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041679 | Feig | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058010 | Williams et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060206619 | Dan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070112948 | Uhlik | May 2007 | A1 |
20070203844 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226118 | Gill | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070299771 | Brody et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1197837 | Apr 2002 | EP |
WO 0041426 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Greene, William, “Sample selection in credit-scoring models”, Mar. 31, 1998, Dept. of Econ, Stern School of Business, NYU, Elsevier Science, Japan and the World Economy, pp. 299-316. |
O'Connell, Brian, “Around the World With Global Network”, Oct. 1993, DEC Professional, v12, n10, p38(6). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110075672 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12330779 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 12962709 | US | |
Parent | 10720587 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 12330779 | US |