The field of use includes the draw-down or de-inventory of pipeline sections, such as transmission and gathering lines in the midstream sector. Typical pipeline sections may contain Liquefied Petroleum Gas, abbreviated as LPG, or Highly Volatile Liquid, abbreviated as HVL. The pipelines may therefore contain a mixture of liquid and gas, as well as any intermediate phases between liquid and gas.
Pipelines may need a draw-down operation for various reasons, including the routine maintenance for issues like valve replacement, corrosion or damage repair to the pipe. Other needs may include operational requirements like to tie-in connections for an addition of lateral pipelines, relocations of existing pipelines to facilitate other utilities or infrastructure. Other needs may also include inspections such as pressure testing or cutting out stuck inline inspection tools, idling pipelines when not in use for long periods or abandonment at the end of its service life.
A typical existing method used to perform a LPG or HVL pipeline draw-down or de-inventory operation is to use a dual phase flare stack designed to burn the evacuated fluids. During this process, the flare typically initially receives 100% liquid phase until the product pressure in the pipeline section reaches its vapor pressure. At this point, the flare receives a multi-phase fluid defined as a mix of liquid and vapor phase, because the product may cold-boil in the pipeline. At some point during this process, the percentage of vapor will far exceed the liquid in the line. At this stage, the flare will receive significantly more vapor along with low volume slugs of liquid. Slug flow is caused by the vapor flowing faster thru the flare than the liquid thereby causing wave action of the liquid left in the pipe. This fast-flowing vapor pushes the liquid wave up from the below the grade or ground level of the pipeline, up to the flare connection above grade. Since the liquid then slows the flow to the flare, the vapor velocity in the pipe slows causing the wave to fall back down to the lower portions of the pipeline causing the process to repeat until no liquid is left or until there is so little liquid; the vapor velocity is not high enough to bring the liquid up to the connection point. Many variables may control this slugging action including diameter of the pipe, vapor pressure of the product, elevation changes of the pipe and capacity of the flare system to flow these fluids and vapors.
When using this existing method, most of the product in the pipeline may be treated as waste and consumed by the flare. Therefore, most value of the product inside the pipeline may be lost and the combustion of the entire volume of product within the pipeline may increase the amount of released emission in the atmosphere.
Another existing prior art may include using a multi-phase cross-compression unit to pump product from one pipeline section being de-inventoried into an adjacent section of pipeline or vessel. These units are most effective during the stage when they are receiving liquids as the density is higher than the gas or vapor phase, thereby moving more product with each stroke of the compressor. Though, once the cross-compression unit no longer receives liquids, the effectiveness drops off significantly and the process becomes dependent on the expansion ratio of the product and its vapor pressure. For example, the expansion ratio of propane is 270:1, therefore the compressor would need to pump 270 cubic feet of vapor to equal 1 cubic foot of liquid de-inventoried product. Conversion effects may also be part of the process as with varying pressures, liquid volume may become gas volume as the pressure inside some pipe section is decreasing, for example due to the movement of fluids caused by the cross-compression unit.
When using this method, most of the product in the pipeline may be recovered, though this method may have a limitation on longer sections of pipeline, typically above 5000 ft [1500 m]. Using this method on longer section of pipeline, the time required for draw-down may typically be above 36 hours per 1000 ft [300 m] of pipeline. This time required may be cost prohibitive for some operations as it would keep the pipeline out of service during the drawdown operation, resulting in a low efficiency method.
For a more detailed description of the embodiments of the disclosure, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings.
It is to be understood that the following disclosure describes several exemplary embodiments for implementing different features, structures, or functions of the invention. Exemplary embodiments of components, arrangements, and configurations are described below to simplify the disclosure; however, these exemplary embodiments are provided merely as examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Even if advantages and other features will become apparent from the following schematics, description and proposed claims, the proposed list of advantages may be limiting.
The proposed invention process may use a combination of some elements of the two methods described in the existing art section, while adding specific usage, features and control method.
One advantage of the proposed invention would be to capture as much product as practical from the drawdown pipeline, while completing the draw-down in the same time frame as a typical flaring operation would take. The proposed invention may therefore result in a higher proportion of product recovery from the drawdown pipeline, typically between 40% and 80%, while limiting the combustion of hydrocarbon product in the atmosphere, and while keeping the reduced time of straight flaring operation. Overall, the proposed invention may improve both the financial and environmental aspects of the drawdown operation.
Following item numbers refer to the
As depicted in
The separation vessel 1 may allow the flare 7 to operate at constant high velocity rates only receiving gas or vapor from a vessel top connection 2, typically located at the top of the separation vessel 1.
Typically, the drawdown section 8 would be considered as the section intended to be de-inventoried or drawn down. The drawdown section 8 may have the shape of a pipeline or a hose, as depicted in
The flare 7 would be a device to combust, oxidize or vent a waste product, such as vapors or gas. A gas phase 14 would be typically present on the upper section within the separation vessel 1. The gas phase 14 may flow through a vessel top connection 2 and through a flare section 16. The flare 7 may also be designated as flare stack, combustor, incinerator, thermal oxidizer, burner, vent stack, stack pipe or riser.
A flow line 11 may connect the drawdown section 8 to the separation vessel 1 at a flow connection feed-in 21. The flow line 11 may be typically linked to the drawdown section 8 through a drawdown section connection 5. The drawdown section connection 5 may be a tie-in point on the pipeline of the drawdown section 8 allowing flowing the mixture of liquid and gas inside the flow line 11.
The separation vessel 1, also designated as knock-out tank, or gas buster, or slug catcher, or trap tank, may have the shape of a barrel or tank. The longest vessel dimension may be oriented either towards a vertical axis or towards a horizontal axis. In
Different types of separation vessel 1 may be used, such as mechanical, gravity or centrifugal. The usage, shape and types of separation vessel 1 may depend on the proportion of fluid versus gas to be separated, the types of fluid or gas such as the expansion ratio between liquid and gas, the quantities of mixture being separated, the time and capacity of operation, the environment parameters such as pressure and temperature.
The liquid phase 15 may be pumped out of the separation vessel 1 from a vessel bottom connection 3, typically located at the bottom or at a lower point of the separation vessel 1. A liquid pump 10 or a group of liquid pumps 10, as further described in
The one or multiple liquid pumps 10 may be operated manually, remotely, or automated. Each liquid pump 10 may be operated through pneumatic, pressure, electrical, mechanical, or hydraulic means. The type of each liquid pump 10 may include a piston pump, a screw pump, a diaphragm pump, a centrifugal pump, a gear pump, a lobe pump, a metering pump, a progressive cavity pump, a plunger pump or multi-phase pump. The one or multiple liquid pumps 10 would displace the liquid phase 15 at a rate, typically between 0 and 3 BPM [0 to 0.5 m3/min].
As for the drawdown section 8, the adjoining section 4 may have the shape of a pipeline as depicted in
The adjoining section 4 may be separated from the drawdown section 8 by a pipe line block valve 12. The pipeline block valve 12 would typically be closed during draw down operation to prevent direct flow between the mixture contained within the drawdown section 8 and the mixture, typically fluids, contained within the adjoining section 4. The adjoining section 4 and the drawdown section 8 may also not be in line with each other's, and may be two separate or distinct sections of tanks, tubulars, vessels, hoses, and may not need the pipeline block line valve 12 as a separation.
The gas phase 14 may flow out of the separation vessel 1 through the vessel top connection 2, and may flow through a flare section 16, typically as a discharge flow and may not need a dedicated pump. The flow of gas within the flare section 16 towards the flare 7 may be controlled by a flow control valve 9.
The flow control valve 9 may a device or group of devices to restrict or control the flow of gas flowing to the flare 7 through the flare section 16. The flow control valve 9 may be operated manually, remotely or automated. The operation mode of the flow control valve 9 may be through pneumatic, pressure, electric, mechanical, hydraulic or manual means. The flow control valve 9 may be designated as regulator, choke, throttle valve, float valve, gate valve, globe valve, butterfly valve, pinch valve, diaphragm valve, reducing valve, regulator valve or needle valve.
The flow of gas through the flare line 16, controlled by the flow control valve 9, may influence the separation efficiency of the separation vessel 1 and may in turn influence the flowrate of the flow line 11 pulling typically a mixture of gas and liquid from the draw down section 8. The objective of the process may be to keep the flowrate out of the draw down section 8 as high as possible, while keeping operating within the limits of the flare 7, including for example the pressure, velocity, smoke, heat, within the flare 7. Keeping a high flowrate out the draw down section 8 would also keep a high flowrate of the fluid phase 15 flowing through the liquid flowline 17. The gas flow through the flare section 16 to the flare 7 may be reduced or shut off, if the capacity of the liquid pump 10 cannot regulate the level 13 within the separation vessel 1. An over-proportion of the liquid phase 15 inside the separation vessel 1 may conduct the liquid phase 15 to flow to the flare 7, which would typically be avoided. Another parameter to regulate with the flowrate to the flare 7 may be the pressure within the separation vessel 1. A higher pressure in the separation vessel 1 would minimize vaporization. Additional regulation of the level 13 may be necessary if the evaporation process increases inside the separation vessel 1, requiring increasing the flowrate inside the flare section 16, through the flow control valve 9, towards the flare 7. As the proportion of the fluid inside the drawdown section 8 continues to decrease or pressure within the flow line 11 continues to drop below a critical point, typically below the vapor pressure of the fluid mixture, it may be necessary to further adjust the gas or liquid flowrates, through the flow control valve 9 or liquid pump 10, to ensure the highest proportion of the drawdown mixture from the drawdown section 8 remains in liquid phase. Process parameters and a regulation method are proposed within
In
An injection of inert gas may be added to the application process and is symbolized in
As another variation, depicted in
Parameters 30 represent the variables which may be significant for the flow section 11, between the drawdown section 8 and the separation vessel 1. Parameters 30 may be described as following:
Parameters 31 represent the variables which may be significant within the separation vessel 1. Parameters 31 may be described as the following:
Parameters 32 represent the variables which may be significant for the flare section 16, between the top connection 2 of the separation vessel 1 and the flare 7. Parameters 32 may be described as the following:
Parameters 33 represent the variables which may be significant for the liquid flowline 17, between the bottom connection 3 of the separation vessel 1 and the adjoining section 4. Parameters 33 may be described as the following:
Note that by default, only liquid phase 15 would be present inside the liquid flowline 17.
A primary goal of the regulation method, represented as a regulation loop 40 in
RBactual 41 would represent an input or actual measured ratio or level inside the separation vessel 1. RBcommand 42 would represent a target ratio or level considered as a command. RBcommand could include a wished ratio, typically between 0.4 to 0.6, as well as a RBmin, representing the minimum ratio for an optimum operation, and a RBmax, representing the maximum ratio for an optimum operation. A typical RBmin value may be between 0.1 and 0.3. A typical RBmax value may be between 0.7 and 0.9. The consequence of the RB regulation may be to maintain QA high enough, pulling from the draw-down section 8, in order to maintain RB above RBmin and therefore the necessary liquid phase 15 for the liquid pump(s) 10 to reclaim. The difference between RBactual 41 and RBcommand 42 would be calculated as the regulation difference & 43. A typical goal of the regulation loop 40 may be to keep the regulation difference & 43 as small as possible or within predetermined limits corresponding to the minimum and maximum wished ratio RBmin and RBmax.
Additional goals of regulation may include keeping QC as high as possible, keeping QD as high as possible, keep RB as low as possible, i.e. maximum gas and mini liquid, or optimizing QC so that PB is as high as possible to prevent vaporization.
The regulation loop may include RBactual 41 as input. A first output action 45 may be the adjustment of the speed or flow output of liquid pump(s) 10, which may directly influence QC. A second output action 46 may be the adjustment of the opening of the flow control valve 9 which may directly influence QD.
The regulation loop 40 may be controlled by a control system 44 performing at a predetermined frequency, either manual or automatic, typically between once every 1 second to once every 10 hours.
The electronic recorder 52 and the feedback connection 53 and 54, as depicted in
Other regimes may also be part of the regulation loop 40, with additional output and specific actions. Other regimes may include a start regime or an end regime. Example of a start regime, which may be performed as part of the process, may include the removal of contaminates such as air, nitrogen within the separation vessel 1. Other start regimes may include the purge of the flare 7 using product from the drawdown section 8. Example of end regimes may include opening the flow control valve 9 towards the flare 7 to its maximum, allowing the maximum flow of gas phase 14, in case for example if the level 13 is down below 0.25.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63428135 | Nov 2022 | US |