Methoxyacrylate-based fungicide and methods for preparing and using the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9422254
  • Patent Number
    9,422,254
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 27, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 23, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A pharmaceutical composition of fungicide including at least a compound represented by Formula (I).
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention relates to a methoxyacrylate, the preparation, fungicides containing same, and the use as a fungicide


2. Description of the Related Art


The methoxyacrylate fungicides were firstly developed by Zeneca Co., Ltd. (Syngenta) in 1980s and exhibit advantages such as high efficiency, broad-spectrum, and relative environmental friendliness. The structure unit of β-methoxyacrylate is the pharmacophore of this kind of fungicide. However, with the increase of fungus having drug resistance, a more powerful fungicide is desired.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the above-described problems, it is one objective of the invention to provide a pharmaceutical composition of fungicide.


It is another objective of the invention to provide a method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition of fungicide.


It is still another objective of the invention to provide a method for preventing and treating a plant disease.


To achieve the above objectives, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical composition of fungicide comprising a compound represented by Formula (I): (E)-methyl 3-methoxy-2-(2-((5-methoxy-benzothiazol-2-ylthio)methyl)phenyl)acrylate.




embedded image


In a class of this embodiment, the compound is mixed with an emulsifier, a cosolvent, a stabilizer, and a solvent to yield an emulsifiable concentrate. The emulsifiable concentrate can be used to prevent and treat powdery mildew, downy mildew, gray mold, brown spot, scab of vegetables and fruits, southern leaf blight of corn, rice false smut, citrus stem-end rot, and rape sclerotinia rot. The emulsifiable concentrate has effect even on resistant strains, with high efficiency, low toxicity, and environmentally friendliness.


In a class of this embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of fungicide comprises between 5 and 10 wt % of the compound represented by Formula (I), between 0 and 15 wt % of the emulsifier, between 0 and 30 wt % of the cosolvent, between 0 and 2 wt % of the stabilizer, and between 0 and 65.5 wt % of the solvent.


In a class of this embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of fungicide comprises between 5 and 10% wt of the compound represented by Formula (I), 10% wt of the emulsifier, between 20 and 30 wt % of the cosolvent, 2% wt of the stabilizer, and between 48 and 65.5% wt of the solvent.


In a class of this embodiment, the emulsifier is pesticide emulsifier No. 500, pesticide emulsifier No. 33, pesticide emulsifier No. 700, pesticide emulsifier No. 601, sodium C8-20alkyl sulfate, Tween 80, Tween 60, ammonium styryl polyethenoxy ether sulfate, pesticide emulsifier No. 300, pesticide emulsifier No. 600 having a polymerization degree of 15-30, styrenephenol polyethenoxy polyoxypropylene ether, nonylphenol polyethenoxy ether, alkylphenol formal polyethenoxy ether, diphenol polyethenoxy ether, or a mixture thereof.


In a class of this embodiment, the solvent is toluene, xylene, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, or a mixture thereof.


In a class of this embodiment, the cosolvent is dichloromethane, N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMAC), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), acetone, pyrrolidone, or a mixture thereof.


In a class of this embodiment, the stabilizer is epoxidized soybean oil, epoxy chloropropane, 3-chloro-1,2-propylene oxide, butyl glycidyl ether, phenyl glycidyl ether, cresyl glycidyl ether, polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether, sodium sorbitol, 0.1 wt. % citric acid aqueous solution, 0.1 wt. % benzoic acid aqueous solution, or 0.1 wt. % sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, there provided is a method for preparing a pharmaceutical composition of fungicide comprising mixing the compound of Formula (I), an emulsifier, a cosolvent, a stabilizer, and a solvent and stiffing uniformly.


In a class of this embodiment, upon mixing and stirring, the compound of Formula (I) is between 5 and 10 weight parts, the emulsifier is between 0 and 15 weight parts, the cosolvent is between 0 and 30 weight parts, the stabilizer is between 0 and 2 weight parts, and the solvent is between 0 and 65.5 weight parts. The resultant emulsifiable concentrate comprises between 5 and 10 wt. % of the compound of Formula (I), between 0 and 15 wt. % of the emulsifier, between 0 and 30 wt. % of the cosolvent, between 0 and 2 wt. % of the stabilizer, and between 0 and 65.5 wt. % of the solvent.


In a class of this embodiment, upon mixing and stiffing, the compound of Formula (I) is between 5 and 10 weight parts, the emulsifier is 10 weight parts, the cosolvent is between 20 and 30 weight parts, the stabilizer is 2 weight parts, and the solvent is between 48 and 65.5 weight parts. The resultant emulsifiable concentrate comprises between 5 and 10 wt. % of the compound of Formula (I), 10 wt. % of the emulsifier, between 20 and 30 wt. % of the cosolvent, 2 wt. % of the stabilizer, and between 48 and 65.5 wt. % of the solvent.


The emulsifier, cosolvent, stabilizer, and solvent are the same as defined above.


In a class of this embodiment, the compound of Formula (I) is prepared as follows.




embedded image


The intermediate (II) reacts with the intermediate (III) in the presence of a base. The base is sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, or potassium carbonate. A reaction solvent is water, methanol, ethanol, N,N-dimethyl formamide, or a mixture thereof, particularly a mixed solvent of water and N, N-dimethyl formamide with a volume ratio of 5:1. A reaction temperature is from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent. A reaction time is between 4 and 6 hrs. A molar ratio of the intermediate (II) to the intermediate (III) to sodium hydroxide is 1:1:1.2.


In a class of this embodiment, the intermediate (II) is prepared as follows.




embedded image


1-chloro-4-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene, carbon disulfide, and sodium polysulfide are mixed and refluxed for between 4 and 6 hrs to yield the intermediate (II).


In a class of this embodiment, the intermediate (III) is prepared following the method disclosed in Pestic. Sci., 1991, 31, 499-519, the steps are:




embedded image


Advantages of the invention are summarized below:

    • 1. The pharmaceutical composition of fungicide is broad-spectrum and highly efficient in killing pathogens and can be used to prevent and treat powdery mildew, downy mildew, gray mold, brown spot, scab of vegetables and fruits, and so on, and its efficacy is higher than that of azoxystrobin and kresoxim-methyl;
    • 2. The pharmaceutical composition of fungicide is particularly effective on powdery mildew of melons; results of field trial show that 3.75 g/acre of active ingredients can effectively control powdery mildew of melons; and
    • 3. The pharmaceutical composition of fungicide has effect even on resistant strains and no cross resistance occurs.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described hereinbelow with reference to accompanying drawings, in which the sole FIGURE is a schematic diagram of crystal structure of the compound of Formula (I) according to one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

For further illustrating the invention, experiments detailing a pharmaceutical composition of fungicide, a preparation method and use thereof are described below. It should be noted that the following examples are intended to describe and not to limit the invention.


Example 1
Preparation of Compound of Formula (I)
(E)-methyl 3-methoxy-2-(2-((5-methoxy-benzothiazol-2-ylthio)methyl)phenyl)acrylate
Preparation of Intermediate (II)

244 g of sodium polysulfide solution was mixed with 30 g of 1-chloro-4-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene, and then 20 mL of carbon disulfide was added with stiffing. The mixture was heated and refluxed for about 5 hrs and a yellow solid precipitated. The mixture was filtered and the filtrate was diluted with water to 1000 mL. An orange yellow solution was obtained. The solution was neutralized with hydrochloric acid (6M) to yield a light yellow solid. The solid was filtered, washed with water, and dried. 29.4 g of products was obtained with a yield of 93.1%.


Preparation of Intermediate (2): methyl 2-o-tolylacetate

To a flask (1000 mL), 120 g of 2-methylphenylacetic acid and 400 mL of anhydrous methanol were added, and then 24 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was further added with stiffing. The mixture was heated with an oil bath and refluxed. The reaction was monitored with thin layer chromatography (TLC) until the reactants were basically consumed. Subsequently, the solvent was removed by vacuum distillation. The residue was dumped into 400 mL of water and extracted with 400 mL of ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water (2×200 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under reduced pressure. A light yellow oily product was obtained. The light yellow oily product was further distilled under vacuum condition to yield 117.3 g of a colorless oily product (135-140° C., 16 mmHg) with a yield of 92%.


Preparation of Intermediate (3): methyl 3-hydroxy-2-o-tolylacrylate

To a three neck flask (1000 mL), 50 g of methyl 2-o-tolylacetate and 600 mg of toluene were added, and then 54.3 g of sodium methoxide was further added with stiffing. The mixture was cooled with an ice-water bath to less than 10° C., and then a mixture of methyl formate (65 mL) and toluene (50 mL) was dripped. After that, the ice-water bath was removed and the temperature was raised slowly to room temperature. The solution was allowed to react with stirring for 12 hrs, and then dumped into 1000 mL of water, shaken, standed for demix. The organic layer was extracted with 500 mL of water twice. The water layer was combined, acidized with 6M hydrochloric acid to pH value of 4-5, extracted with ethyl acetate, dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and distilled under vacuum condition to yield 55.9 g of light red oily product with a yield of 95%.


Preparation of Intermediate (4): methyl 3-methoxy-2-o-tolylacrylate

To a flask (1000 mL), 48 g of methyl 3-hydroxy-2-o-tolylacrylate, 54.4 g of potassium carbonate, and 500 mL of ethylene glycol dimethyl ether were added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for an hour, and then 36 mL of dimethyl sulfate was added. The mixture was allowed to react for between 6 and 8 hrs with stiffing at room temperature. The reaction was monitored with thin layer chromatography (TLC) until the reactants were basically consumed. Subsequently, the mixture was filtered, the solvent was removed by vacuum distillation, the residue was washed with water (1000 mL), extracted with ethyl acetate (2×300 mL), dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a light yellow oily product with a yield of 97%.


Preparation of Intermediate (III)

39.14 g of methyl 3-methoxy-2-o-tolylacrylate, 41.3 g of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), and 1.44 g of azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) were mixed with 200 mL of carbon tetrachloride. The mixture was lighted with an incandescent lamp for 6 hrs, cooled, and filtered. The filtrated was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a yellow viscous material which could be used directly for further reaction.


Preparation of the Compound of Formula (I)

To 350 mL of an aqueous solution having 8.0 g of sodium hydroxide, 31.8 g of Intermediate (II) was added and stirred for 20 min. Subsequently, 70 mL of N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution having 54 g of Intermediate (III) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 hrs and water added until the total volume was 1000 mL. The solution was extracted with dichloromethane, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and the product purified by chromatography over silica gel eluted with ethyl acetate/hexane, 52.1 g of a yellow solid was obtained with a total yield was 80.5%. m.p. 85-87° C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.72 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 3.82 (s, 3H, ═CH—OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.52 (s, 1H, CH2), 6.94 (dd, J=2.4 Hz, J=8.8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.16 (t, J=4.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.29-7.31 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.40 (d, J=2.8 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.54-7.61 (m, 3H, ═CH—OCH3, ArH). EI MS: m/z (%) 401 (M+, 4), 369(19), 205 (11), 167 (24), 144 (100), 101 (37). Anal. Calcd for C20H19NO4S2: C, 59.83; H, 4.77; N, 3.49. Found: C, 59.89; H, 5.01; N, 3.27.



FIG. 1 shows the crystal structure of the compound of Formula (I).


Example 2
Evaluation on Indoor Bioactivity of Compound of Formula (I)

To verify the bioactivity of the compound of Formula (I), experiments evaluating indoor bioactivity comprising fungicidal activity test on potted plants at room temperature, fungicidal spectrum assay (in vitro), and in vivo micro-screening assay are carried out.


1. Fungicidal Activity Assay on Potted Plants at Room Temperature


Take cucumber downy mildew and powdery mildew as examples, the assay were carried out as follows:


1) Pseudoperonospora cubensis: Pathogen of Cucumber Downy Mildew


Two cucumber seedlings (the growing point had been removed) having the same growth status and in the true leaf stage were collected, sprayed with the compound of Formula (I), and dried naturally for 24 hrs for inoculation. Fresh cucumber leaves infected by downy mildew were collected, and sporangium on the back was rinsed with distilled water (about 10° C.) dipped with a brush. The obtained sporangium was prepared into a suspension (2-3×105 cells/mL). The suspension was sprayed uniformly with an inoculation sprayer (0.1 MPa) to the naturally-dried cucumber seedlings. Subsequently, the seedlings were cultured in an artificial climate chamber. The relative humidity was maintained at 100%, with temperature of between 15 and 20° C. 24 hrs later, the relative humidity was maintained at 90%, with temperature of between 15 and 24° C. 5 days later, compared with the control, the disease of the cucumber seedlings was graded. Based on the resultant disease index, the efficacy was calculated.


2) Sphaerotheca uliginea: Pathogen of Cucumber Powdery Mildew


A cucumber seedling having uniform growth status and in the true leaf stage was collected, sprayed with the compound of Formula (I), and dried in the shade for 24 hrs. Fresh spore was collected from cucumber leaves infected by Sphaerotheca uliginea, filtered with a double-layer gauze, and prepared into a suspension (1.0×105 cells/mL). The suspension was sprayed to the dried cucumber seedling. Subsequently, the inoculated seedling was dried naturally and cultured under light in a thermostatic chamber (21-23° C.). 7-8 days later, compared with the blank control, the disease of the cucumber seedlings was graded. Based on the resultant disease index, the efficacy was calculated.


3) Calculation Method


The grading standard follows “Guidelines on efficacy evaluation of pesticides”, and the efficacy is calculated on the basis of the disease index.

Disease index=Σ(total amount of diseased leaves of a grade×value of the grade)×100/(total amount of leaves×9);
Efficacy (%)=(disease index of blank control−disease index of experiment group)×100/disease index of blank control


The results are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.









TABLE 1







Efficacy of the compound of Formula (I) on potted cucumber


infected by downy mildew and powdery mildew








Concentration
Efficacy (%)









(mg/L)
Cucumber downy mildew
Cucumber powdery mildew












200
100
100


100
100
100


50
100
100


25
94.16
100


12.5
87.34
97.22
















TABLE 2







Results of secondary screening of the compound of Formula (I) on


potted cucumber infected by downy mildew and powdery mildew










Cucumber downy
Cucumber powdery


Concentration
mildew
mildew











(mg/L)
Efficacy (%)
EC50/EC90
Efficacy (%)
EC50/EC90














50
100
1.52/9.76
100
0.96/3.87


25
98.15

100


12.5
91.50

98.50


6.25
82.89

97.22


3.125
69.92

85.24









2. Fungicidal Spectrum Assay (In Vitro)


To broaden the fungicidal spectrum of the compound of Formula (I), as targets the following 20 pathogens were assayed in vitro. The results showed the compound of Formula (I) had a wide fungicidal spectrum, particularly effective on Helminthosporum maydis, Ustilaginoidea virens, and Diaporthe medusa in vitro. The 20 pathogens and resultant plant diseases were:

    • Rice sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani),
    • Cucumber gray mold (Botrytis cinerea),
    • Rape sclerotinia rot (Sclerotinia sclerotirum),
    • Wheat scab (Gibberella zea),
    • Rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae),
    • Cucumber anthracnose (Colletotrichum lagenarium),
    • Potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans),
    • Pepper phytophthora blight (Phytophthora capsici),
    • Southern leaf blight of corn (Helminthosporum maydis),
    • Tomato early blight (Alternaria solani),
    • Apple ring rot (Botryosphaeria berengeriana),
    • Tobacco brown spot (Alternaria alternata),
    • Banana leaf spot (Helminthosporium torulosum),
    • Wheat sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani),
    • Wheat root rot (Bipolaris sorokiniana),
    • Cotton wilt (Fusarium oxysporum),
    • Citrus stem-end rot (Diaporthe medusae),
    • Cotton boll rot (Fusarium moniliforme),
    • Rice false smut (Ustilaginoidea virens), and
    • Peanut brown spot (Cercospora arachidicola).


Measurement of In Vitro Inhibitory Rate


5 wt % formulation of the active compound of Formula (I) was prepared into a solution (300 mg/L). To a sterilized Erlenmeyer flask, 2 mL of the solution and 18 mL of PDA culture medium (50° C.) were added. The mixture was shaken uniformly and dumped into two dishes whose diameter was 9 cm to yield two toxic PDA culture mediums having a concentration of 30 mg/L. Various cultured pathogens were punched at the edge of colony by a puncher having a diameter of 5 mm respectively, and the obtained pieces were transferred to the center of the toxic PDA culture medium by an inoculating needle and cultured in an incubator at 25° C. Repeat the above steps. According to the growth status of CK colony, the colony diameter of pathogens was measured by crossing method with a caliper and thereby a corrected inhibition percentage was calculated.


Calculation of Efficacy


For each colony, diameter was measured twice by crossing method and the average was practicable. The colony growth inhibition rate was calculated as follows:

Colony growth inhibition rate %=(diameter of CK colony−diameter of target colony)×100/diameter of CK colony


The results are listed in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Fungicidal activity (in vitro) of compound of formula (I)


on 20 pathogens









Inhibition rate (%)











Concentration
Concentration
Concentration



(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)


Pathogen
30
3
0.3














Rhizoctonia solani

68.93
62.14
42.72



Botrytis cinerea

54.85
42.73
42.31



Sclerotinia sclerotirum

80.00
61.03
50.77



Gibberella zea

54.59
45.87
34.86



Pyricularia oryzae

82.61
56.52
23.60



Colletotrichum

50.72
44.20
42.03



lagenarium




Phytophthora infestans

38.00
33.74
15.34



Phytophthora capsici

28.85
23.07
0



Helminthosporum

100
100
86.11



maydis




Alternaria solani

43.92
39.19
32.43



Botryosphaeria

63.64
49.65
44.06



berengeriana




Alternaria alternata

43.14
41.83
37.25



Helminthosporium

21.43
18.45
11.31



torulosum




Rhizoctonia solani

68.52
44.44
22.22



Bipolaris sorokiniana

43.75
40.63
18.75



Fusarium oxysporum

43.70
36.13
29.41



Fusarium moniliforme

43.58
30.77
9.60



Diaporthe medusae

87.23
80.14
55.32



Ustilaginoidea virens

100
100
74.77



Cercospora

40.48
35.71
30.95



arachidicola










Following the above method, as targets 17 pathogens originated from tropical plants were tested. The pathogens were Rhizopus sp., Aspergillus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz, Banana Fusarium wilt, Colletouichum coccodes, Hughas, B. heveas, Cucumber mosaic virusstrain banana, Banana Sigatoka Leaf Spot Disease, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum musae (Berk & Curt) Arx, Botryodiplodia theobromae, Cladosporium cucumerinum Ellis et Arthur, Periconia hevenae, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, B. cinerea, Diplodia natalensis, and Curvularia.


The results are listed in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Fungicidal activity (in vitro) of compound of formula (I)


on 17 pathogens originated from tropical plants











Concentration




Pathogen
(mg/L)
Inhibition rate (%)
EC50














Rhizopus sp.

20
88.5
4.1774



15
83.6



10
69.3



5
53.1



1
18.4



Aspergillus

50
86.12
5.0287



25
71.43



10
58.37



5
47.76



1
27.35



0.1
10.61



Colletotrichum

50
80.93
4.6266



gloeosporioides Penz

25
69.26



10
54.86



5
50.19



1
31.13



0.1
16.73


Banana Fusarium wilt
50
80.43
9.2172



25
67.62



10
60.50



5
30.25



1
13.52



Colletouichum

25
83.54
7.1258



coccodes. Hughas

15
61.28



5
42.07



2
22.26



0.1
10.06



B. heveas

15
81.44
1.9902



10
70.45



5
61.36



1
43.94



0.1
9.09


Cucumber mosaic
15
84.84
1.9212


virusstrain banana
10
76.64



5
62.30



1
40.16



0.1
9.84


Banana Sigatoka Leaf
20
85.77
1.4987


Spot Disease
10
77.90



5
63.67



1
43.45



0.1
17.23



Colletotrichum

20
83.16
1.9699



gloeosporioides

10
69.36



5
55.89



1
42.42



0.1
18.18



Colletotrichum musae

20
85.82
1.6555


(Berk & Curt) Arx
10
78.72



5
64.54



1
37.23



0.1
19.15



Botryodiplodia

20
83.97
3.6962



theobromae

10
65.85



5
51.57



1
31.71



0.5
14.63



Cladosporium

20
84.86
4.844



cucumerinum Ellis et

10
72.11


Arthur
5
54.98



2.5
28.29



1
6.77



Periconia hevenae

15
81.72
0.3775



10
77.61



5
74.25



1
66.42



0.1
33.21



Colletotrichum

20
87.24
6.9152



gloeosporioides

10
55.19



5
33.83



1
19.29



0.1
7.12



B. cinerea

10
88.09
1.0016



5
73.35



1
54.55



0.5
35.11



0.1
12.85



Diplodia natalensis

20
82.35
1.7048



10
73.68



5
60.68



1
40.25



0.1
20.74



Curvularia

15
80.60
0.5051



10
76.59



5
75.92



1
63.55



0.1
28.76









3. In Vivo Micro-Screening Assay


To further study the fungicidal spectrum of the compound of Formula (I), indoor in vivo micro-screening assay were carried out on cucumber gray mold, cucumber scab, cucumber sclerotinia rot, cucumber brown spot, pepper phytophthora blight, and rice sheath blight. The results showed that the compound of Formula (I) had good prevention and treatment effect on cucumber gray mold, cucumber scab, cucumber brown spot, and rice sheath blight.


1) Target Strains


Cucumber scab strain: HX; cucumber brown spot strain: SDHGHB060509; cucumber sclerotinia rot strain: HGJH; pepper phytophthora blight strain: NSGP; and rice sheath blight strain: WK-1.


Cucumber gray mold strain had three different resistant strains: F109 (anti-benzimidazole and its derivatives, sensitive to N-phenylcarbamate, dicarboximide, and pyrimidine amine); Q503001 (sensitive to benzimidazole and its derivatives, N-phenylcarbamate, dicarboximide, and pyrimidine amine); and SC504002 (sensitive to benzimidazole and its derivatives as well as dicarboximide, anti-N-phenylcarbamate and anti-pyrimidine amine).


2) Medication and Inoculation


Medicament to be tested and medicament of control groups were prepared as needed in a sunny morning. Cucumber gray mold, cucumber scab, cucumber brown spot, cucumber sclerotinia rot, and rice sheath blight were medicated by spray, and after air dry, pathogens of cucumber scab and of cucumber brown spot were inoculated through spraying spore suspension respectively, pathogens of cucumber gray mold, of cucumber sclerotinia rot, and of rice sheath blight were inoculated through lawn foliage. Pepper phytophthora blight was medicated and inoculated by root-irrigation. Subsequently, all seedlings were cultured in wet environment.


3) Investigation


After the disease of control groups were serious, spot area, disease index, and the diseased seedling rate were investigated to calculate the efficacy. Cucumber scab, cucumber brown spot, and pepper phytophthora blight were investigated by grading method. The spot extension area of cucumber gray mold and of rice sheath blight was investigated. The diseased seedling rate of cucumber sclerotinia rot was investigated.

Disease index=Σ(amount of infected diseased leaves in a grade×relative value of the grade)×100/(total amount of leaves×9);
Diseased seedling rate (%)=(total amount of seedlings−amount of diseased seedlings)/total amount of seedlings×100%
Prevention and treatment effect (%)=(disease of control group−disease of experiment group)/disease of control group×100%


The results are listed in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Results of in vivo micro-screening test of Compound of Formula (I)













Concentration
Spot area (mm2)
Efficacy


Target
Medicament
(mg/L)
or disease index
(%)














Cucumber gray mold
Compound of
500
3.67
96.43


(F-109)
Formula (I)
100
8.03
92.19



25% Amistar SC
125
8.65
89.82



CK
Clear water
102.81



Cucumber gray mold
Compound of
500
5.64
90.67


(SC504002)
Formula (I)
100
6.82
88.71



25% Amistar SC
125
6.14
89.82



CK
Clear water
60.46



Cucumber gray mold
Compound of
500
2.82
97.71


(Q503001)
Formula (I)
100
7.78
93.69



25% Amistar SC
125
8.53
93.09



CK
Clear water
123.39



Cucumber sclerotinia rot
Compound of
500
34.65
58.88



Formula (I)
100
70.08
16.84



25% Amistar SC
125
24.45
70.99



CK
Clear water
84.27



Cucumber scab
Compound of
500
0
100.00 



Formula (I)
100
0
100.00 



25% Amistar SC
125
4.44
91.31



CK
Clear water
51.11



Cucumber brown spot
Compound of
500
4.44
89.10



Formula (I)
100
6.11
85.00



25% Amistar SC
125
3.33
91.82



CK
Clear water
40.74



Pepper phytophthora
Compound of
500
24
30.09


blight
Formula (I)
100
25.33
26.22



25% Amistar SC
125
10
70.87



CK
Clear water
34.33



Rice sheath blight
Compound of
500
46.87
70.04



Formula (I)
100
59.96
61.67



25% Amistar SC
125
86.43
44.74



CK
Clear water
156.42





*F-109, SC504001, Q503001, cucumber sclerotinia rot, and pepper phytophthora blight referred to spot area (mm2), cucumber scab, cucumber brown spot, rice sheath blight referred to disease index.






Example 3
Acute Toxicity and Ames Test

Bioassay results showed that the compound of Formula (I) had good preventive effect on downy mildew and powdery mildew. The toxicological indexes of the compound were tested following the standard GB15670-1995 “Toxicological test methods of pesticides for registration” by Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The results showed that the compound had low toxicity.


The results are listed in Table 6.









TABLE 6







Results of Acute Toxicity and Ames test of compound (I)









No.
Items
Toxicity





1
Acute oral test
Male rat: LD50 > 5000 mg/kg




Female rat: LD50 > 5000 mg/kg




Low toxicity


2
Acute skin test
Male rat: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg




Female rat: LD50 > 2000 mg/kg




Low toxicity


3
Eye stimulation test
Mild stimulation on rabbit's eye


4
Skin stimulation test
No stimulation on rabbit's skin


5
Skin sensitization test
Weak allergen (grade I) on guinea




pig skin


6
Ames test
Negative


7
Micronucleus Test of Mice
Negative



Polychromatic Erythrocytes


8
Chromosome aberration test
Negative



of mice spermatogonial









Example 4
Environmental Assessment Test

After acute toxicity and Ames test had been finished, environmental toxicity test was conducted following “Guideline for Environmental Safety Evaluation of Chemical Pesticides” of Agriculture Ministry of China by Shenyang Chemical Research Institute/Supervision and Test Center for Pesticide Safety Evaluation and Quality Control. The results showed that the compound was environmentally friendly.


The results are listed in Table 7.









TABLE 7







Results of environmental toxicity test









No.
Items
Toxicity





1
Acute toxicity test on zebra fish
LC50 (24 hrs): 0.069 mg.a.i/L




LC50 (48 hrs): 0.060 mg.a.i/L




LC50 (72 hrs): 0.047 mg.a.i/L




LC50 (96 hrs): 0.043 mg.a.i/L


2
Acute oral toxicity test on quail
LC50 > 1100 mg/kg.bw


3
Acute contact toxicity test on bee
LC50 (48 hrs) > 100 μg a.i./per bee


4
Toxicity test on silkworm after
LC50 (24 hrs) > 300.0 mg/kg mulberry leaves



96 hrs' administration
LC50 (48 hrs) > 300.0 mg/kg mulberry leaves




LC50(96 hrs) > 132.1 mg/kg mulberry leaves









Example 5
Enzyme Activity Test

Take NADH oxidase (NOX), succinate-cytochrome C oxidase (SCO), and Complex III as target enzymes, the inhibitory activity of the compound of Formula (I) was tested. The results showed that, the compound had much higher inhibitory activity on NOX, SCO, and Complex III than azoxystrobin which functioned as a control agent, particularly on Complex III.









TABLE 8







Results of enzyme activity test of the compound of Formula (I)









IC50 (nM)












Medicament
NOXa
SCOa
Complex IIIb
















Compound of Formula (I)
5.3
3.4
4



Azoxystrobin
27
13
200











a NOX is generally used to detect an inhibitor of Complex I and Complex III; SCO is generally used to detect an inhibitor of Complex II and Complex III. Thus, an inhibitor of Complex III should have inhibitory activity on the two enzymes.



b The test target is cytochrome bc1 complex of pig heart.


Example 6
Preparation of Emulsifier Concentrate

Materials:

    • 1) (E)-methyl 3-methoxy-2-(2-((5-methoxy-benzothiazol-2-ylthio)methyl)phenyl)acrylate. (prepared following Example 1) having 98% active ingredient.
    • 2) Emulsifier: pesticide emulsifier No. 500 and Tween 80 (both from market)
    • 3) Cosolvent: DMF, DMSO, and acetone (all from market)
    • 4) Stabilizer: epoxidized soybean oil (from market)
    • 5) Solvent: toluene and xylene (both from market)


Emulsifier Concentrate 1


To a beaker (1000 mL), 50 g (100% basis) of the compound of Formula (I), 150 g of DMF, and 50 g of acetone were added and stirred for dissolution. To the solution, 25 g of pesticide emulsifier No. 500 and 50 g of Tween 80, 20 g of epoxidized soybean oil, and 655 g of toluene were added. Thus, the emulsifier concentrate 1 having 5 wt. % of the compound of Formula (I) was obtained and further packed.


Emulsifier Concentrate 2


To a beaker (1000 mL), 75 g (100% basis) of the compound of Formula (I), 150 g of DMF, and 50 g of acetone were added and stirred for dissolution. To the solution, 50 g of pesticide emulsifier No. 500 and 50 g of Tween 80, 20 g of epoxidized soybean oil, and 605 g of toluene were added. Thus, the emulsifier concentrate 2 having 7.5 wt. % of the compound of Formula (I) was obtained and further packed.


Emulsifier Concentrate 3


To a beaker (1000 mL), 100 g (100% basis) of the compound of Formula (I), 150 g of DMF, and 150 g of acetone were added and stirred for dissolution. To the solution, 50 g of pesticide emulsifier No. 500 and 50 g of Tween 80, 20 g of epoxidized soybean oil, and 480 g of toluene were added. Thus, the emulsifier concentrate 3 having 10 wt. % of the compound of Formula (I) was obtained and further packed.


Example 7
Field Efficacy Trial

On the basis of indoor activity evaluation, field efficacy trials of the compound of Formula (I) on cucumber downy mildew, cucumber powdery mildew, and melon powdery mildew were conducted. The results are listed in Tables 9-11.









TABLE 9





Efficacy of emulsifier concentrate 1 (comprising 5 wt. % of the


compound of Formula (I)) on cucumber powdery mildew


(After three times' administration)




















Active

Disease index
At 7th day













ingredient

(%) prior to
Disease
Efficacy


Medicament
(mg/L)
No.
administration
index (%)
(%)





Compound
100
1
9.2
1.7
91.17


of Formula

2
7.6
1.2
92.74


(I)

3
8.4
1.9
90.16




4
7.6
1.2
92.41




Average
8.2
1.5
91.67



50
1
7.2
2.1
85.88




2
7.2
2.4
84.49




3
8.0
2.8
86.18




4
7.2
2.2
85.31




Average
7.6
2.4
85.63



25
1
8.1
3.6
78.48




2
8.4
4.2
76.74




3
8.1
4.6
77.57




4
7.0
3.3
77.35




Average
7.9
3.9
77.54



12.5
1
9.2
5.5
71.05




2
8.7
5.5
70.59




3
9.3
6.7
71.54




4
9.2
5.8
69.71




Average
9.1
5.9
70.50


25% Amistar
167
1
7.4
2.7
82.33


SC

2
8.2
2.8
84.11




3
7.7
3.2
83.58




4
7.1
2.3
84.44




Average
7.6
2.8
83.24











CK
1
9.2
19.0




2
8.7
18.7



3
7.9
20.0



4
8.6
17.9



Average
8.6
18.9













At 14th day
At 21st day














Active

Disease

Disease




ingredient

index
Efficacy
index
Efficacy


Medicament
(mg/L)
No.
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)





Compound
100
1
0.9
96.46
3.3
91.58


of Formula

2
1.3
94.43
2.6
92.15


(I)

3
1.4
95.18
2.8
93.17




4
1.0
95.68
3.0
91.23




Average
1.2
95.23
2.9
91.52



50
1
2.1
89.44
3.2
89.57




2
1.8
91.85
3.0
90.44




3
2.7
90.23
4.4
88.74




4
1.9
91.34
3.7
88.58




Average
2.1
90.99
3.6
89.45



25
1
3.5
84.35
6.8
8030




2
4.2
83.71
6.8
81.42




3
4.8
82.85
8.0
79.79




4
3.5
83.59
6.2
80.32




Average
4.0
83.51
7.0
77.78



12.5
1
6.4
74.80
12.6
67.88




2
6.3
76.40
12.0
68.34




3
7.8
75.73
13.9
69.40




4
6.6
76.45
12.3
70.29




Average
6.8
75.66
12.7
68.91


25% Amistar
167
1
2.7
86.78
4.9
84.46


SC

2
3.2
87.28
5.3
85.16




3
3.2
87.97
5.2
86.18




4
2.5
88.44
4.7
85.29




Average
2.9
87.57
5.0
85.34












CK
1
25.4

39.2




2
26.7

37.9



3
27.3

38.6



4
26.2

38.7



Average
26.4

38.6
















TABLE 10





Efficacy of emulsifier concentrate 1 (comprising 5 wt. % of the


compound of Formula (I)) on cucumber downy mildew





















At 12th day after



Active

second administration















ingredient

Total
Disease
Efficacy



Medicament
(mg/L)
No.
leaves
index
(%)







Compound of
100
1
34.0
0.98
83.71



Formula (I)

2
32.0
1.39
76.93





3
32.0
0.69
88.46





Average
32.7
1.02
83.04




50
1
32.0
1.04
82.70





2
32.0
1.74
71.16





3
32.0
1.39
76.93





Average
32.0
1.39
76.93




25
1
32.0
1.74
71.16





2
32.0
2.08
65.39





3
32.0
1.74
71.16





Average
32.0
1.85
69.24



25% Amistar
125
1
32.0
1.39
76.93





2
32.0
0.69
88.46





3
32.0
1.39
76.93





Average
32.0
1.16
80.77














CK

1
32.0
1.16






2
32.0
6.25





3
32.0
5.90





Average
32.0
6.02


















At 5th day after third
At 9th day after third



Active

administration
administration
















ingredient

Total
Disease
Efficacy
Total
Disease
Efficacy


Medicament
(mg/L)
No.
leaves
index
(%)
leaves
index
(%)





Compound
100
1
32.0
2.08
81.99
48.0
8.10
78.08


of Formula

2
32.0
2.43
78.99
48.0
7.18
80.58


(I)

3
32.0
3.13
72.99
48.0
6.02
83.72




Average
32.0
2.55
77.99
48.0
7.10
80.79



50
1
32.0
3.47
69.99
48.0
10.65
71.19




2
32.0
4.51
60.99
48.0
7.18
80.58




3
32.0
3.82
66.99
48.0
8.33
77.45




Average
32.0
3.94
65.99
48.0
8.72
76.41



25
1
32.0
4.86
57.99
48.0
12.04
67.43




2
32.0
4.51
60.99
48.0
10.42
71.82




3
32.0
4.86
57.99
48.0
12.04
67.43




Average
32.0
4.75
58.99
48.0
11.50
68.89


25% Amistar
125
1
32.0
3.47
69.99
48.0
8.80
76.20




2
32.0
3.13
72.99
48.0
5.79
84.34




3
32.0
2.43
78.99
48.0
9.95
73.07




Average
32.0
3.01
73.99
48.0
8.18
77.87














CK
1
32.0
12.85

48.0
36.34




2
32.0
10.42

48.0
34.72



3
32.0
11.46

48.0
39.81



Average
32.0
11.57

48.0
36.96
















TABLE 11





Efficacy of emulsifier concentrate 1 (comprising 5 wt. % of the


compound of Formula (I)) on melon powdery mildew




















Prior to
At 7th day after first



Active
administration
administration














ingredient
Total
Disease
Total
Disease
Efficacy


Medicament
(mg/L)
leaves
index
leaves
index
(%)





Compound of
100
1394
6.29
1490
6.29
39.15


Formula (I)
50
1374
7.20
1452
7.92
35.77



25
1412
6.97
1435
7.11
34.38



12.5
1169
6.90
1416
8.80
27.16


25% Amistar SC
125
1387
7.37
1499
7.54
37.81


CK

1326
10.30
1306
17.42















At 7th day after
At 14th day




second
after second



Active
administration
administration















ingredient
Total
Disease
Efficacy
Total
Disease
Efficacy


Medicament
(mg/L)
leaves
index
(%)
leaves
index
(%)





Compound of
100
1478
4.52
86.22
1339
19.45
63.47


Formula (I)
50
1483
10.88
75.54
1559
30.42
54.57



25
1473
13.63
67.15
1523
31.50
47.00



12.5
1545
13.44
61.65
1587
40.33
29.55


25% Amistar SC
125
1497
10.31
74.87
1541
30.95
53.41


CK

1283
48.66

1505
75.36









While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and therefore, the aim in the appended claims is to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for preventing and/or treating a plant disease, the method comprising applying a fungicidal composition to a plant in need thereof, wherein: said fungicidal composition comprises a compound represented by Formula (I):
  • 2. A method for preventing and/or treating a plant disease, the method comprising applying a fungicidal composition to a plant in need thereof, wherein: said fungicidal composition comprises a compound represented by Formula (I),
  • 3. A method of treating and/or preventing downy mildew or gray mold in a plant, the method comprising applying an effective amount of a fungicidal composition to the plant, wherein said fungicidal composition comprises a compound represented by Formula (I):
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2008 1 0047642 May 2008 CN national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2009/071301 with an international filing date of Apr. 16, 2009, designating the United States, and further claims priority benefits to Chinese Patent Application No. 200810047642.1 filed May 8, 2008. The contents of all of the aforementioned applications, including any intervening amendments thereto, are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
3857959 Rosenwald Dec 1974 A
4356179 Petteruti Oct 1982 A
5304530 Cliff et al. Apr 1994 A
5677303 Curtze et al. Oct 1997 A
6617330 Walter Sep 2003 B2
20030055096 Oguri Mar 2003 A1
20050220834 Wang et al. Oct 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
101248794 Aug 2008 CN
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
“Glycidyl Ether Reactions with Amines” by Shechter et al., Indus. Eng. Chem. 48, 94-97 (1956).
“Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach to Drug Design” by Patani et al., Chem. Rev. 96, 3147-76 (1996).
“Bioisosterism” in “The Organic Chemistry of Drug Design and Drug Action” by Silverman, Academic Press (New York), pp. 19-23 (1992).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100292285 A1 Nov 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/CN2009/071301 Apr 2009 US
Child 12843899 US