The present invention relates to a disc drive microactuator system and more particularly to an improved structure for increased stability of the microactuator rotor.
The density of concentric data tracks on magnetic discs continues to increase (that is, the width of data tracks and radial spacing between data tracks are decreasing), requiring more precise radial positioning of the transducing head. Conventionally, head positioning is accomplished by operating an actuator arm with a large-scale actuation motor, such as a voice coil motor, to radially position a slider (which carries the head) on a flexure at the end of the actuator arm. The large-scale motor lacks sufficient resolution to effectively accommodate high track-density discs. Thus, a high resolution head positioning mechanism, or microactuator, is necessary to accommodate the more densely spaced tracks.
One particular design for high resolution head positioning involves employing a high resolution microactuator in addition to the conventional lower resolution actuator motor, thereby effecting head positioning through dual stage actuation. Various microactuator designs have been considered to accomplish high resolution head positioning. In particular, magnetic microactuator designs featuring a magnet/keeper assembly and coil have been developed. Magnetic microactuators typically include a stator portion and a rotor portion, the stator being attached to the flexure and the rotor supporting the slider. The rotor is movable with respect to the stator such that the slider can be positioned more precisely over a track of a disc.
Some existing magnetic microactuators use flexible beam springs in a “wagon wheel” design located on top of the slider to support the rotor. The beam springs have a limited thickness, generally 20 to 30 microns, with their thickness being constrained by the total microactuator thickness. Thin beam springs are highly stressed by normal disc drive loads, such as head slap deceleration. During head slap deceleration, a load in a disc drive causes the suspension, microactuator and slider to lift off the disc momentarily and then crash back into the disc surface with a very high deceleration, sometimes approaching 600 gravities (g). Under 600 g, the flexible beam springs bear a weight of 0.1 Newton (N). The force applied during head slap deceleration induces high stress in the flexible beam springs.
Prior art designs utilizing a linear accessing motion suffer from uncontrolled rotor shifting caused during hard seek acceleration of the voice coil motor (VCM). The large shift in rotor position stresses the beam springs to approximately 8.8% of their breaking strength and because of the time-varying nature of the VCM acceleration induces fatigue failure. There is a need in the art for an improved microactuator beam structure to increase the rotor stability.
The present invention is a disc drive having a recording disc rotatable about an axis, a slider supporting a transducing head for transducing data with the disc, and a dual-stage actuator assembly supporting the slider to position the transducing head adjacent a selected radial track of the disc. The dual-stage actuation assembly includes a movable actuator arm, a suspension assembly supported by the actuator arm and including a flexure, a slider bonding pad supporting the slider and a microactuator. The microactuator includes a rotor attached to the slider bonding pad and a stator attached to the flexure. A beam structure operatively connects the rotor to the stator so as to permit movement of the rotor with respect to the stator. The beam structure includes a first beam pair element aligned with the width of rotor and a second beam pair element aligned with the length and the width of the rotor.
VCM 18 is selectively operated to move actuator arm 20 about axis 22, thereby moving slider 12 between tracks 14 of disc 16. However, for disc drive systems with high track density, VCM 18 lacks significant resolution and frequency response to position a transducing head on slider 12 precisely over a selected track 14 of disc 16. Therefore, a higher resolution actuation device is necessary.
Flexible beam elements operatively connect the rotor to stator 38, permitting movement of the rotor with respect to stator 38. The flexible beam elements form a beam structure 46 comprised of a first beam pair element 48 and a second beam pair element 50. First beam pair 48 has a left first beam 48a and a right first beam 48b. A rotation center 52 located at the intersection of left first beam 48a and right first beam 48b defines the center of in-plane rotation for the rotor. The rotor is balanced about rotation center 52 and perfect balance is approached by use of beam structure 46.
Second beam pair 50 includes a left lateral beam 50a and a right lateral beam 50b. Both left lateral beam 50a and right lateral beam 50b have a dog-leg configuration such that one length of each lateral beam 50a and 50b is aligned with the length of the rotor alongside magnet bonding pad 42 between pad 42 and stator 38. A transverse length 50c and 50d of lateral beams 50a and 50b are aligned with the width of the rotor and lie between the proximal end of magnet bonding pad 42 and stator 38. Left lateral beam 50a is attached to first stator arm 56, while right lateral beam 50b is attached to second stator arm 58. A connector 62 connects the rotor (at the proximal end of magnet bonding pad 42) to second beam pair 50 at its approximate midpoint. Transverse length 50c of left lateral beam 50a and transverse length 50d of right lateral beam 50b are connected at connector 62.
Left lateral beam 50a and right lateral beam 50b allow connector 62 to move transversely, in the direction of arrows 45 (as seen in FIG. 5). The transverse lengths 50c, 50d of second beam pair 50 also allow connector 62 to move laterally, in the direction of arrows 63 (as seen in FIG. 6). Therefore connector 62 can move transversely and laterally around rotation center 52 in a plane parallel to the disc surface, thus tracing an arc around rotation center 52 (as seen in FIG. 5).
Head slap deceleration is a condition that occurs when a load in the disc drive causes head suspension 24, attached to flexure 28 (FIG. 2), microactuator 32 and slider 12 to momentarily lift off of disc 16 and then crash back into the disc surface with very high deceleration. The deceleration approaches 600 gravities (g), thus the weight of suspension borne by microactuator 32 is about 0.1 Newtons (N). Some existing magnetic microactuators use flexible beam springs in a “wagon wheel” design located on top of the slider to support the rotor. The beam springs have a limited thickness, generally 20 to 30 microns. The beam spring thickness is constrained by the total microactuator thickness. The limited thickness of the beam springs in the prior art increases the stress borne by those beam springs during a head slap event. Beam elements 48 and 50 of the present invention have a typical beam height of approximately 200 microns, which is enabled by packaging beam structure 46 around the sides of the rotor, thereby not increasing overall height of microactuator 32. Generally as the beam spring thickness increases, the stress in the beam decreases. Increasing the height of beam elements 48 and 50 reduces the stress in that beam under head slap loading according to the following relation:
For example, to calculate the stress in left lateral beam 50a, S equals the stress in the beam element (N/m2), M is the bending moment (N−m), y is the half height (m) of left lateral beam 50a, and I is the area moment of inertia (m4=wh3/12). F is the vertical loading under head slap deceleration (N), L is the length (m) from the beam root point (where left lateral beam 50a attaches to first stator arm 56) to loading (where head suspension 24 bears down on slider 12 during a head slap event), w is the width (m) of left lateral beam 50a, and h is the height (m) of left lateral beam 50a. Comparing the present invention having beam heights (for beam elements 48 and 50) of approximately 200 microns with the prior art microactuator having beam heights of 25 microns, the stresses in the beam elements are reduced by approximately a factor of 32.
In some prior art embodiments of the microactuator, uncontrolled shifting of the rotor occurs during hard seek accelerations of VCM 18, that is movement of the slider across a large number of tracks. A large, in-plane shift in rotor position (approximately 24.8 microns) stresses some prior art beam elements to about 8.8% of their breaking strength. Because of the time-varying acceleration of VCM 18, fatigue failure in the beam elements may be induced. In the present invention, first beam pair element 48 defines rotation center 52. The rotor is balanced about the rotation center 52. The design of beam structure 46 and near perfect balance of the rotor results in substantially less rotor shifting (approximately 0.56 microns) during acceleration of VCM 18. The stress induced in beam structure 46 is significantly less, approximately 0.6% of the breaking strength, and a safe level for fatigue stress.
Beam structure 46 is preferably designed to be relatively compliant in the longitudinal direction. As illustrated by
Beam structure 46 operatively connects the rotor of microactuator 32 to stator 38 and prevents excessive movement and twisting of the stator out of the horizontal plane of microactuator 32. Beam structure 46 is comprised of first beam pair element 48 aligned with the width of the rotor and second beam pair element 50 in a dog-leg configuration and aligned with the length and the width of the rotor. During a head slap event, the increased thickness of beam elements 48 and 50 and the arrangement of beam structure 46 around the sides of the rotor, reduces the stress in the beam elements, prevents failure of the beam elements and keeps the rotor from significant movement out of the horizontal plane of microactuator 32. The rotor of the present invention is balanced about rotation center 52 defined by first beam pair 48. During hard seek acceleration by VCM 18, near perfect balance of the rotor about rotation center 52 results in significantly less stress induced in beam structure 46 by uncontrolled rotor shifting, thus decreasing the likelihood of fatigue stress in beam structure 46. During stiction loading of micro actuator 32, deflection limiters 64 and 66 prevent slider 12 from being completely pulled out of stator 38. The inability for the rotor of the present invention to maintain its position within the horizontal and vertical planes of micro actuator 32 is an advantage over prior art microactuators.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 60/218,279, filed Jul. 13, 2000 for “Micro-Actuator Structure With Rotary Access Mode” by Peter Crane and Zine-Eddine Boutaghou.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3924268 | McIntosh et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4374402 | Blessom et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4651242 | Hirano et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4764829 | Makino | Aug 1988 | A |
4914725 | Belser et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5021906 | Chang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5034828 | Ananth et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036419 | Okauchi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5177652 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5189578 | Mori et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5303105 | Jorgenson | Apr 1994 | A |
5364742 | Fan et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375033 | MacDonald | Dec 1994 | A |
5521778 | Boutaghou et al. | May 1996 | A |
5657188 | Jurgenson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5745319 | Takekado et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764444 | Imamura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781381 | Koganezawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796558 | Hanrahan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801472 | Wada et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805375 | Fan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5856896 | Berg et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867347 | Knight et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5896246 | Budde et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898541 | Boutaghou | Apr 1999 | A |
5898544 | Krinke et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920441 | Cunningham et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936805 | Imaino | Aug 1999 | A |
5959808 | Fan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6246552 | Soeno et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297936 | Kant et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6396667 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6465934 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466412 | Adams et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6512659 | Hawwa et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 412 221 | Nov 1989 | EP |
63-122069 | May 1988 | JP |
02-263369 | Apr 1989 | JP |
04-134681 | May 1992 | JP |
04-368676 | Dec 1992 | JP |
05-094682 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06-020412 | Jan 1994 | JP |
07-085621 | Mar 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020018322 A1 | Feb 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60218279 | Jul 2000 | US |