The invention relates generally to protection of switching devices, and more particularly, to protection of micro-electromechanical system based switching devices.
A circuit breaker is an electrical device designed to protect electrical equipment from damage caused by faults in a circuit. Traditionally, most conventional circuit breakers include bulky electromechanical switches. Unfortunately, these conventional circuit breakers are large in size thereby necessitating use of a large force to activate the switching mechanism. Accordingly, to employ electromechanical contactors in power system applications, it may be desirable to protect the contactor from damage by backing it up with a series device that is sufficiently fast acting to interrupt fault currents prior to the contactor opening at all values of current above the interrupting capacity of the contactor.
As an alternative to slow electromechanical switches, fast solid-state switches have been employed in high speed switching applications. As will be appreciated, these solid-state switches switch between a conducting state and a non-conducting state through controlled application of a voltage or bias. For example, by reverse biasing a solid-state switch, the switch may be transitioned into a non-conducting state. However, since solid-state switches do not create a physical gap between contacts when they are switched into a non-conducting state, they experience leakage current. Furthermore, solid-state switches are used in a combination of series parallel topology that includes one or more arrays of switches that facilitate higher voltage and current handling capabilities. However, the arrays of switches open or close asynchronously, resulting in an undesirable magnitude of load current flowing through the switches. Accordingly, the load current may exceed the current handling capabilities of the switches causing shorting or welding and rendering the switches inoperable. Therefore, there is a need for enhanced protection of such an array of switches.
Briefly, an electrical switching device is presented. The electrical switching device comprises a plurality of switch sets coupled in series, each switch set comprising a plurality of switches coupled in parallel. The electrical switching device further comprises a control circuit coupled to the plurality of switch sets and configured to control opening and closing of the switches. The electrical switching device further comprises one or more intermediate diodes coupled between the control circuit and each point between a respective pair of switch sets.
In another embodiment, an electrical switching system is presented. The electrical switching system comprises a switching circuitry comprising a micro-electromechanical system switch configured to switch the system from a first switching state to a second switching state. The electrical switching system further comprises a voltage draining circuitry coupled to the switching circuitry, wherein the voltage draining circuitry is configured to drain a voltage at contacts of the switching circuitry. The electrical switching system further comprises a control circuitry coupled to the voltage draining circuitry, wherein the control circuitry is configured to form a pulse signal, and wherein the pulse signal is applied to the voltage draining circuitry in connection with initiating an operation of the switching circuitry.
In another embodiment, a method of protecting an electrical switching device is presented. The method comprises triggering a current pulse into at least one pair of diodes via a control circuit, wherein the at least one pair of diodes are coupled between a plurality of switch sets and the control circuit. The method further comprises biasing the at least one pair of diodes based upon the triggering. The method further comprises discharging a voltage across the plurality of switch sets via biasing of the pair of diodes.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
In accordance with embodiments of the invention, structural and/or operational relationships, as may be used to provide voltage scalability (e.g., to meet a desired voltage rating) in a switching array based on micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches are described herein. Typically, MEMS refer to micron-scale structures that, for example, can integrate a multiplicity of functionally distinct elements, e.g., mechanical elements, electromechanical elements, sensors, actuators, and electronics, on a common substrate through micro-fabrication technology. It is contemplated, however, that many techniques and structures presently available in MEMS devices will be available via nanotechnology-based devices, e.g., structures that may be smaller than 100 nanometers in size. Further, it will be appreciated that MEMS based switching devices, as referred to herein, may be broadly construed and not limited to nanotechnology based devices or micron-sized devices.
Referring again to
One or more pairs of diodes are coupled between the control circuit 36 and each point between a respective pair of switch sets 12, 14, 16 and 18. The line-side diode (DS) 40 is coupled across the parallel switch set 12 and the control circuit 36. Similarly, a load-side diode (DL) 42 is coupled across the parallel switch set 18 and the control circuit 36. According to one embodiment of the invention, the line-side diode (DS) 40 and the load-side diode (DL) 42 are configured to carry a bulk of load current. In the illustrated embodiment, the intermediate diode block 54 includes intermediate diodes (D1) 48, (D2) 50, and (D3) 52 that are coupled respectively across each point between the switch set 12, 14, 16 and 18 through connections 56, 58, and 60. It may be appreciated that, intermediate diodes (D1) 48, (D2) 50, and (D3) 52 may carry relatively lesser load current compared to the line-side diode (DS) and load-side diode (DL). According to an aspect of the present technique, diodes (line-side, load-side and intermediate) may be referred to as voltage draining circuitry as they are configured to drain the voltage across each switch sets 12, 14, 16 and 18 at an instance when the switch 20 is operational (turn-on and/or turn-off).
A grading network 62 is coupled to the switch 20 at each point between the parallel switch sets 12, 14, 16 and 18 though connection 64 on the line-side, connection 66 on the load-side and via connections 68, 70, and 72 at intermediate locations. In one embodiment, the grading network 62 is configured to distribute voltage equally across the switch sets 12, 14, 16 and 18. In an exemplary embodiment, the grading network 62 is configured to protect the switch 20 from voltage and current spikes.
Turning now to
It may be noted that, when an array of MEMS switches is turned on, the switches do not all close at exactly the same time. Such asynchronous switching may result in closing of a single switch set to complete the circuit connection between source and load resulting in full load current flow in one switch set. A single switch set may not be configured to carry the load current resulting in welded contacts within and permanent damage. Control circuit 36 is used to forward bias the diodes (line-side, load-side, and intermediate) during an instance of turn-on of the switch 20. The forward bias on the diodes completes the power circuit and collapses the voltage across the MEMS switches while they are being closed and while current builds in the load circuit. During turn-on, the pulse is applied first, while the contacts are closed. The contacts close during the pulse, the load current flows through the switches when the pulse is over.
Similarly, during turn-off when the contacts of the switch 20 are still closed but contact pressure is diminishing due to the switch opening process, the switch resistance increases. Due to increased resistance, excessive load current may flow in one switch set resulting in damage if switched asynchronously, as noted above. Control circuit 36 is configured to forward bias the diodes (line-side, load-side, and intermediate) at an instance of turn-off. Forward biasing results in diodes conducting and, in turn, causes the load current to start to divert from the MEMS switch 20 into the diodes. In this present condition, the diode bridge presents a path of relatively low impedance to the load circuit current and protecting the switch 20 from excessive current. Accordingly, as noted above, during the instance of turn-on and/or turn-off, load current may be diverted into the diodes at line-side, load-side, and intermediate locations, as will be described in detail in the following paragraph.
A line-side diode 40 is coupled between the control circuit 36 and the switch 20 at a point closer to the source 28. Similarly, the load-side diode 42 is coupled to a point between the control circuit 36 and the switch 20 at a point closer to the load 32. The line-side diode 40 further includes a pair of diodes generally referred to as turn-on diode 96 and turn-off diode 98. Similarly the load-side diode 42 includes turn-on diode 100 and turn-off diode 102. Furthermore, intermediate diodes 48, 50, and 52 are coupled at intermediate positions between the parallel switch sets 12, 14, 16, 18, and the control circuit 36. The intermediate diodes 48, 50, and 52 include respectively turn-on diodes 104, 108, 112 and turn-off diodes 106, 110, and 114.
Typically, the line-side diode 40 is configured in such a way that the turn-on diode (96, 100) activates during the instance of turn-on when the switch 20 is about to be closed (begin to conduct load current). Similarly the turn-off diode (98, 102) activates during the instance of turn-off when the switch 20 is about to be opened (stop conducting load current). In an exemplary embodiment, turn-on diodes 96, 100, 104, 108, and 112 are forward biased at turn-on. Typically, during turn-on, the voltage across each parallel switch set 12, 14, 16, and 18 is desired to be zero that is achieved by forward biasing the turn-on diodes 96, 100, 104, 108 and 112. Similarly, during turn-off, the voltage across the parallel switch sets 12, 14, 16, and 18 is desired to be equal to avoid unequal voltage distribution that may damage certain switch sets 12, 14, 16 and/or 18 and an alternate path for the decreasing load current (least resistance path). In an exemplary embodiment, forward biasing the turn-off diodes 98, 102, 106, 110, and 114 at turn-off provides alternate path for the load current and equal voltage distribution across the parallel switch sets 12, 14, 16, and 18.
It may be appreciated by one skilled in the art, that the diodes carry the load current during their operation and require sufficient current rating as the load current. However, it may be noted that the bulk of the load current may flow through the line-side diode 40 and the load side diode 42. Therefore, lower rating diodes may be employed as intermediate diodes 48, 50 and 52, as compared to the line-side diode 40 or load-side diode 42. It may be noted that the burden on the control circuit 36 that supplies a pulse to forward bias the diodes does not increase substantially by engaging such lower rating intermediate diodes 48, 50 and 52. In one embodiment, similarly rated diodes are selected for diodes 40, 42, 48, 50, and 52. However, multiple parallel branches of diodes may be employed for the line-side diode 40 and load-side diode 42. In another embodiment, higher rated diodes may be selected for the line-side and load-side diodes 40 and 42 and lower rated diodes may be selected for the intermediate diodes 48, 50 and 52. However, it may be noted that, diode properties such as low forward drop voltage may be selected for all the diodes (line-side, load-side and intermediate) to facilitate lower current burden on the control circuit.
Advantageously, such diode arrangements and grading network as described herein, helps in achieving equal voltage distribution across the switches. Employing such diode configurations substantially reduces effects of stray capacitance and RC time constant difference between various components of the circuit. Intermediate diodes ensure that voltage is clamped to zero across each switch in a multiple switch configuration. Further, reduced current rating of the intermediate diodes may not cause an extra burden on the control circuit that drives the diodes.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3040232 | Healis | Jun 1962 | A |
3202904 | Madland | Aug 1965 | A |
3532976 | Adelaar et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3859568 | Sakshaug | Jan 1975 | A |
4122415 | Luther et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4236099 | Rosenblum | Nov 1980 | A |
4692643 | Tokunaga et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5235147 | Pham et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
6055161 | Church et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6459559 | Christofersen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6738246 | Strumpler | May 2004 | B1 |
6741435 | Cleveland | May 2004 | B1 |
6940363 | Zipper et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7079363 | Chung | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7332835 | Wright et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7382634 | Buchmann | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7605456 | Obu et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7643256 | Wright et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20040080964 | Buchmann | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070139829 | Arthur et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080164961 | Premerlani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1452194 | Oct 2003 | CN |
101226835 | Jul 2008 | CN |
1562121 | Feb 1970 | DE |
2056315 | May 2009 | EP |
11054263 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2008136345 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008192597 | Aug 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Christopher M. Doelling et al., Nanospot welding and contact evolution drying cycling of a model microswitch, Journal of Applied Physics , Jun. 18, 2007, vol. 101, Issue 12, pp. 124303-124303-7. |
Search Report and Written Opinion from corresponding EP Application No. 09169531 dated Mar. 26, 2012. |
Unofficial English translation of Office Action from JP dated Sep. 3, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100061024 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |