1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to devices for testing of biologics. More particularly, this invention relates to methods and technologies for producing micro-organ devices.
2. Background Art
Testing of pharmaceuticals and biological compounds in human or animals is not always possible, at least not in the early stage. Therefore, sometimes decisions need to be made based on in vitro data. Extrapolating in vitro data (e.g., cell culture data) to the in vivo relevant conditions is often very difficult. Although pharmacokinetic principles can be used to derive some conclusions, this approach has limitations due to various reasons.
For example, cell cultures under the assay conditions may not function in the same ways as they would in the natural settings. The communication and interactions between different tissues and organs are absent. In culture, cells are typically grown at the bottom of chambers or wells. These systems may have unreaslistically high liquid-to-cell ratios. Even if the cells are grown on microcarrier beads, which more closely resemble physiological conditions, they still may not mimic physiological conditions accurately enough to provide reliable data.
For example, cell-cell interactions between different cell types may be important. The conventional cell cultures do not allow proper interactions between different cell types. U.S. Pat. No. 6,221,663 issued to Bhatia et al. discloses methods for producing co-cultures of cells in which at least two cell types are present in a micropattern configuration.
Having cell-cell interactions in a co-culture is an improvement over the traditional cell culture methods. However, in human or animals, livers often play important roles in the metabolism and bioavailability of pharmaceuticals and biological compounds. Consequently, methods of predicting human response from in vitro cell culture assays are not always reliable. Even though in vivo animal studies can provide data more relevant to human responses, animal testings are expensive, labor-intensive, and time consuming.
Therefore, there is a need for in vitro organ or system models that can mimic the in vivo organs or systems in animals. U.S. Pat. No. 5,612,188 issued to Shuler et al, discloses a multi-compartmental cell culture system. This patent is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This culture system includes components, such as culture chambers, sensors, and pumps. This system is expensive to operate and requires a large amount of space. Because this system is on such a large scale, the physiological parameters vary considerably from those found in an in vivo situation. It is impossible to accurately generate physiologically realistic conditions at such a large scale.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0082795 A1 by Shuler et al. discloses in vitro microscale cell culture analog devices that permit cells to be maintained in vitro under conditions similar to those found in vivo. This patent is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The microscale culture device comprises a fluidic network of channels segregated into discrete but interconnected chambers. The specific chamber geometry is designed to provide cellular interactions, liquid flow, and liquid residence parameters that correlate with those found for the corresponding cells, tissues, or organs in vivo. The fluidics is designed to accurately represent primary elements of the circulatory or lymphatic systems. In one embodiment, these components are integrated into a chip format. The design and validation of these geometries is based on a physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model; a mathematical model that represents the body as interconnected compartments representing different tissues.
Similarly, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0152909 A1 discloses micro-organ cultures which include isolated populations of cells having specific characteristics. These micro-organ cultures have the ability to be maintained in culture for relatively long periods of time, as well as the preservation of an organ micro-architecture which facilitates, for example, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions analogous to those in the source organ.
These prior art organ models demonstrate the advantages of these in vitro systems for pharmaceutical or biological compounds testing. However, the prior art approaches rely on directly placing the cells in the chamber or seeding the cells and allowing them to grow in the chamber. These approaches do not always provide reproducible organs. Therefore, there remains a need for better in vitro organ devices and methods for their preparation.
In one aspect, embodiments of the present invention relate to methods for fabricating a micro-organ device. A method in accordance with one embodiment of the invention includes printing a micro-organ on a microchip using a cell suspension in a syringe controlled by a computer-aided tissue engineering system, wherein the cell suspension comprises cells suspended in a solution containing a material that functions as a scaffold, and wherein the printing is performed with the computer-aided tissue engineering system according to a predetermined pattern.
In one aspect, embodiments of the present invention relate to micro-organ devices. A micro-organ device in accordance with one embodiment of the invention includes at least one micro-chamber each housing a micro-organ; and at least one microfluidic channel connected to the micro-chamber, wherein the micro-organ comprises cells arranged in a configuration that includes spacing, between portions of the cells to facilitate diffusion exchange between the cells and a medium supplied from the at least one microfluidic channel.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
“Bioprint” or “bioprinting” as used in this description refers to a process of forming micro-organs using a computer-aided tissue engineering (CATE) system to print a micro-organ according to a predetermined design pattern. These processes will be described in more detail in the following sections.
“Microscale” as used herein refers to dimensions no greater than 10 cm, preferably no greater than 1 cm.
“Microchip” as used herein refers to a microscale support having one or more microfluidic channels and one or more micro-chambers for housing micro-organs. A microchip typically has a dimension on the order of a few centimeters.
“Microfluidic channel” as used herein refers to a channel on a microchip. Such channels typically have depth and width that are less than a few millimeters, preferably less than 1 mm.
“Micro-chamber” as used herein refers to a structure (e.g., a well or indentation) on a microchip. A micro-chamber typically has a dimension of no greater than a few cm, preferably 1 cm or less. A micro-chamber is typically for housing cells of a micro-organ.
“Micro-organ” as used herein refers to cells bioprinted on a microchip, typically in a micro-chamber on the microchip.
“Micro-organ device” or “MOD” as used herein refers to a device having at least one micro-organ on a support (such as a microchip).
Embodiments of the invention relate to methods for producing micro-organ devices (MOD) using bioprinting technology and the devices thus produced. The micro-organ devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention comprise microscale 3D tissue analogs in devices that include microfluidic channels and chambers.
In accordance with embodiments of the invention, different mammalian tissues may be mimicked on MODs for various applications, such as experimental pharmaceutical screening for efficacy and toxicity. Thus, these devices may be used to assess the beneficial and detrimental effects of a novel drug after it passes through a given metabolic pathway. For example, the therapeutic or toxic effects of a drug on any cell type in vitro may be assessed in the presence of microencapsulated liver cells to take into account the liver-dependent metabolic modifications of the candidate drug. In addition, these devices may be used to evaluate drug therapeutic benefits or toxicities. These MODs can address the need for in vitro micro-organs that can substantially replicate in vivo structure and function.
The micro-organ devices (MOD) in accordance with embodiments of the invention may be produced by direct bioprinting of specific cells, human or animal, to form micro-organs in micro-chambers of microchips. The bioprinting processes are more controllable and can produce reproducible micro-organs that also mimic the in vivo functions more closely.
The methods of the invention may include forming microchips that include microfluidic channels and micro chambers for housing micro-organs. Next, the desired organs may be bioprinted in the micro-chambers. The bioprinting may use Computer Aided Tissue Engineering (CATE) technology. CATE integrates computer-aided design (CAD) technologies and modern design and manufacturing in bioengineering and biomedicine. CAFE is used in the design, simulation and fabrication, of tissues. For more description of CATE, see e.g., http://www.mem.drexel.edu/cate.
PDMS is a flexible elastomeric polymer that is an excellent material for microfluidic device fabrication. See, McDonald et al., “Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane),” Electrophoresis 2000, 21(1), pp. 27-40. Various PDMS are commercially available, including Sylgard® 184 from Dow Corning. Sylgard is a two-part resin system containing vinyl groups (part A) and hydrosiloxane groups (part B). Mixing of the two resins under appropriate conditions (e.g., by heating at a temperature of 65° C. or higher for 2 hours) leads to crosslinking (or curing), as illustrated below:
Once the polymer cures, the flexible replica 14 can be peeled off the master, leaving the master ready to produce another replica. The replica 14 has a pattern complementary to the design pattern 12. Once the replica 14 is peeled from the mold, it is ready for assembly into a final micro-organ device. These devices may be cut to proper sizes with a standard surgical blade, and access holes may be punched, if needed, for tubings and other device inputs. For tubing inputs, a needle hole slightly smaller than that outer diameter of the tubing may be drilled so that adequate sealing can be achieved.
Another useful property of PDMS is that its surface can be chemically modified in order to obtain the interfacial properties of interest. See, Makamba et al., “Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels,” Electrophoresis 2003, 24(21), 3607-19. One suitable method to covalently functionalize PDMS is to expose it to an oxygen plasma, whereby the surface of Si—CH3 groups along the PDMS backbone are transformed into Si—OH groups by the reactive oxygen species in the plasma. For example, the PDMS surface may be exposed to O2 plasma (100 mW radiofrequency, O2) for 30 seconds to convert the surface methyl silane groups into silanol groups.
These silanol surfaces can then be easily transformed with other alkoxysiloxanes to yield any different chemistries, some of which are illustrated in
In accordance with embodiments of the invention, the organs to be placed in the micro-chambers of MODs may be fabricated or printed using a computer-aided tissue engineering system (CATE).
Using the methods and systems illustrated in
In addition, this device 40 may be used to study metabolism of a drug by a particular organ, such as liver. Livers play critical functions in various biological pathways involving xenobiotics, such as drugs. The functions of livers may include converting a pro-drug into an active drug, converting a drug into a metabolite that may be more active or less active, converting a toxic compound into a soluble form for excretion (detoxification), etc.
Therefore, a micro-organ device having a micro-liver will allow one to use such a device to study these reactions without resorting to animal or human tests. In such assays, a drug or test compound may be supplied in a solution from one end of a micro-channel 42. The capillary effect and gravity may be used to draw the solution into the micro-chamber, where the micro-liver 41 is located, and out the other end of the micro-channel 42. If necessary, pumps, pressure or vacuum may also be used to circulate the fluids in the microfluidic channels. The metabolites or modified drugs collected from the outlet may be analyzed to elucidate the liver metabolism pathways or to study the enzyme activities. In addition, the modified drugs may be used to test on a target micro-organ. Or the like.
For example, the micro-organ 41 may be a micro-liver, while the micro-organ 43 may be the intended target for the drug (e.g., bone). When a drug A is passed through the micro-organ 41 (e.g., liver), it may be converted into a metabolite A′, which may be more active or less active than the original drug. The metabolite A′ then acts on the target organ (e.g., the micro-organ 43). After acting on the target organ, the metabolite A′ may be further metabolized to a new metabolite A″. With such a device, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies will be performed under conditions more closely related to the in vivo conditions than using a cell culture or a single organ device.
A micro-organ device of the invention may include any number of micro-organs. With a proper design of micro-chambers and interconnecting micro-channels, the various interactions between the organs in human may be replicated.
Note that the examples shown in
The microfluidic channels illustrated in the devices of
The interdigitated substructures and the multi-layer stacking may be printed using the CATE system shown in
The interdigitated configuration of the substructures 51 and 52 and the space between them that forms the microfluidic channels 53 are more clearly shown in a top view illustrated in
The 2D top view shown in
As shown in
In the example shown in
The pumps shown in
The methods and technologies for bioprinting of MODs in accordance with embodiments of the invention do not adversely impact the viability of the cells in one example, using mouse hepatocytes (ATCC, CRL-2254) encapsulated in alginate hydrogels, it was found that the resultant micro-organ retained 79% viable cells. A liver micro-organ thus prepared was found to produce a higher amount of urea than the same number of hepatocytes cultured on tissue culture plastic, suggesting that the cells in the MODs of the invention are healthier.
More importantly, micro-organ devices prepared with these methods are found to be able to perform functions similar to the in vivo functions of the corresponding organ. For example,
Methods and technologies in accordance with embodiments of the invention can provide direct and reproducible biopatterning or bioprinting of human or animal cells, extracellular matrix and scaffold materials directly on microfluidic microchips in in vivo-like architectures and arrays. With these methods, it becomes possible to design and test various drugs in a more in vivo-like platform that includes proper inter-communications between different organs.
The various embodiments shown in
Advantages of embodiments of the invention may include one or more of the followings. Methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention use direct biopatterning and bioprinting on microfluidic microchips. These methods eliminate or minimize variations in local seeding densities and also minimize selection pressures that favor more aggressive cells. Direct bioprinting also enables precise and simultaneous coupling of multiple microfluidic channels on one microchip with those on another.
These methods also allow better control of volumetric and quantitative accuracy for specific applications (such as pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity studies). They also enable reproduction of in vivo circulation profiles within and between micro-organs.
The MODs in accordance with embodiments of the invention include in vivo-like micro-organs, and may include unique micro-environments and fluid pathways that mimic the in vivo situations. Methods of the invention provide the reproducibility and quality control that are lacking in the current art; and use simultaneous biopatterning or bioprinting of the cells, extracellular matrix and scaffold directly on the microchip in in vivo-like architect.
The MODs require little resources for investigation of in vivo toxicology and pharmacological effects with high extrapolation to humans. These MODs may be used both in space and on Earth as a drug screening system with human cell micro-organs to supplement/reduce animals studies, and to increase success of clinical trials.
The MODs of the invention may be used in drug screening to supplement/reduce animal studies, and to increase success of clinical trials with new drugs.
The micro-organ-devices (MOD) are designed to mimic the complex in vivo microenvironment by replicating the in viva micro-organ structure, extracellular matrix composition and architecture, and the in viva fluid flow. One or more micro-organs are created by suspending human or animal mammalian cells in a specific soluble extra cellular matrix (ECM) and scaffold, and printed as three-dimensional micro-organs. The micro-organs are directly printed and arrayed as single or multi-organs on micro-fabricated microfluidic devices. The microfluidic device houses the micro-organs, controls and directs the perfusion of cell culture medium and specific soluble factors such as investigative drugs, and chemicals. Fluids are circulated through the micro-organs to maintain viability and to deliver specific soluble factors and molecules. Biopatterning cells, ECM and scaffold directly onto the microchips provide excellent reproducibility and quality control.
The Micro-Organ-Devices (MOD) in accordance with embodiments of the invention address the need for an automated, high-throughput in vitro system that (i) reproduces selected in vivo micro-organs and their fluid pathways, (ii) uses a simultaneous patterning or bioprinting of cells, extracellular matrix and scaffold materials directly on the microchip in in vivo-like architectures and arrays, (iii) provides the required reproducibility and quality control for high throughput and long term operation, and (iv) requires minimal resources (power, mass, fluids).
The MODs in accordance with embodiments of the invention provide in vitro assay systems using human cell-based biopatterned micro-organs with a micro-fabricted, microfluidic chip that more precisely simulates in vivo (especially human) responses to pharmaceuticals. Such an alternative assay platform would enable a greater proportion of candidate drugs to “fail early” prior to clinical trials than the current approach using animal tests, potentially reducing costs and maximize resources and success by accurately selecting a smaller number of candidates for in vitro and in vivo drug metabolism and drug target validation.
The MODs in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be automated, require minimal footprints and power requirements, use micro-volumes of fluids and generate minimal amounts of wastes, and can provide high throughput and parallel analyses on the same chip.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 12/058,227 filed on Mar. 28, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/908,918, filed on Mar. 29, 2007.
The invention described herein was made in the performance of work under a NASA contract and is subject to the provisions of Section 305 of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Public Law 85-568 (72 Stat. 435; 42 U.S.C. 2457).
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60908918 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12058227 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 13688982 | US |