The invention concerns a microreactor for carrying out chemical reactions between a reaction partner in fluid form and a reaction partner in gaseous form.
Such a microreactor represents a miniaturized reaction system for chemical engineering and chemical process technology. Microreactors are known, for example, from EP 0 688 242 and the U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,062. These microreactors are composed of a large number of stacked, interconnected platelets, the surfaces of which contain micromechanically produced structures, which, in combination, produce horizontal reaction spaces for carrying out the desired chemical reactions.
However, such microreactors are unsuitable for carrying out reactions between gaseous and liquid reactants, as the reaction partners can not mix sufficiently in the horizontal reaction spaces.
A technique for catalyzed alkoxylation of fat derivates in a thin film reactor is claimed in the German patent application DE 41 28 827. The heat of reaction is discharged via the interior wall of the pipe and the gas phase. The thin film reactor consists of a bundle of vertical pipes, on whose interior an uninterrupted liquid film of reactants and product flows downwards due to the influence of gravity. The exterior diameter of the pipes amounts to 28-65 cm, the length is up to 6 m. A typical macro-liquid film (33 kg/h lauryl alcohol, 180° C.) has a thickness of about 300 μm.
Thick liquid films, as described in the DE 41 28 827, have the following disadvantages:
The invention therefore has the underlying task of creating a reactor system that avoids the above-mentioned disadvantages of a common vertical tube reactor.
The task of the invention at hand thus consists in the provision of a reactor for carrying out a continuous chemical reaction between a liquid and a gas, whereby the reaction speed as well as the selectivity of the implementation are increased by a better control of reaction parameters such as film thickness, reaction/contact time and temperature. According to the invention, the microreactor will allow an exact temperature control for the reaction processes, ensure quick mixing of the reactants and reduce the danger potential of strongly exothermal or explosive reactions by featuring a small interior volume. Furthermore, the manufacture of the microreactor should be inexpensive, so that it can be used as a single-use system, if necessary. The different components of the microreactor should be such that they can be combined freely, according to the specific requirements. In particular, the amount of product transformed should be scalable—this is to be achieved by an internal parallelization, which means that any number of identical modules can be combined to form a collective reactor block. The different components should be such that they can be connected to one another in a separable or inseparable fashion.
The invention thus concerns a microreactor for carrying out chemical reactions between a reaction partner in fluid form and a reaction partner in gaseous form, if necessary in the presence of a solid catalyst, whereby the chemical process guidance occurs in spaces that are formed by two or several essentially coplanar plates or layers, whereby at least one of these plates or layers represents a fluid guidance plate (1), which is structured and/or arranged in such a way that the fluid reaction partner flows along the surface of this plate or layer only as a result of the influence of gravity and/or capillary forces in at least one essentially uninterrupted capillary thread and thus comes into contact and reacts with the gaseous reaction partner.
Preferably, the fluid guidance plate is arranged essentially perpendicularly to the horizontal plane.
The term “fluid form” comprises reactants which themselves occur in a fluid state of aggregation as well as reactants that are employed in a mixture with a fluid thinner. The term “mixture with a thinner” comprises solutions, suspensions and emulsions. In a particularly favored optimal realization, the fluid reaction partner is employed in the form of a solution or suspension. It should be recognized that the term fluid as used herein and the claims that follow is intended to refer to a liquid, as opposed to a gas.
The term “reaction partner” comprises pure substances or mixtures that contain the educts, i.e. the reactants.
The shaping of the microreactor according to the invention is in itself uncritical. The individual plates or layers can have any suitable geometrical shape. Preferably, they are square or rectangular.
Essential for the microreactor according to the invention are the dimensions of the microstructured areas in which the fluid reaction partner is brought into contact with the gaseous reaction partner.
The dimensions of the structures on the surface of the fluid guidance plate (1) must be chosen such that the fluid reaction partner can freely pass through them as a result of gravity and/or capillary forces.
On the other hand, the structures have to be small enough in order to utilize the immanent advantages of microreaction technology, namely outstanding temperature control, laminar flow, diffusive mixing and small interior volume. Therefore these structures are of a dimension smaller than 1000 μm, preferably smaller than 800 μm, in particular smaller than 600 μm.
Furthermore, the dimension, in particular the length and arrangement of the fluid guidance plate (1), can be adjusted to the specific reaction requirements such as reaction speed, viscosity of the fluid reaction partner and so on.
Diverse parameters have to be taken into account for the chemical process guidance. Hence it is intended to install sensors in the microreactor, in particular for recording the temperature, the pressure, if necessary the flow speed and the flow rate. The sensors are connected to control loops so that the operating sequence can be controlled and regulated, if necessary.
The invention is described using illustrations. These depict:
The central component of the microreactor is the fluid guidance plate (1,
A further object of the invention is a process for manufacturing a structured fluid guidance plate (1) for a microreactor according to the invention. The structures can be created by etching, laser and water jet cutting and drilling, punching and embossing, milling, planing, micro spark erosion, punch drawing, punching and drilling, injection molding and sintering as well as with LIGA-technology and with combinations of these.
In a further process according to the invention, one attaches a grid-shaped plate (41) onto a second, unstructured plate (42) (
An object of the invention thus is a fluid guidance plate (1) with a wall thickness of 120 μm to 4000 μm, preferably 200 μm to 2000 μm for a microreactor according to the invention, mainly consisting of two coplanar elements attached on top of each other, whereby
The fluid guidance plate (1) usually has a length of 2 to 50 cm, preferably 4 to 40 cm, in particular 5 to 25 cm and a width of 5 to 25 cm, preferably 6 to 20 cm, in particular 7 to 15 cm.
In the realization example depicted in
Positioning pins and screws that press the plates together to produce a seal are not depicted.
The fluid guidance plate (1) is supported by an intermediate plate (6) or the bottom plate (22), through which the fluid reaction partner is fed into the reactor via the inlet tube. The inlet tube is connected to a bore (3) that leads to the distribution channel (4), which ensures a uniform distribution of the current. A bottleneck is planned between the distribution channel (4) or the liquid collection channel (7) and the reaction chamber (5). Such a bottleneck can be achieved, for example, by pressing the microstructured fluid guidance plate (1) to the intermediate plate (6) and the microchannels that are thus created restrict the flow of the fluid reaction partner. After the liquid has passed this bottleneck, it comes into contact with the gaseous reaction partner. This contact is maintained as long as the fluid reaction partner flows down the microcapillary grooves of the fluid guidance plate (1).
The gaseous reaction partner flows in an analogous way via the gas inlet tube (8) and the branching-off bore (9) into the gas distribution channel (10). These bores can be closed using screws (14) on the exterior casing. The flow path of the gas is equipped with bottlenecks (11) that are formed by the fluid guidance plate (1) and an intermediate plate (6) and/or the top plate (12).
As the gas flow rate can exceed that of the liquid by several times, the reaction chamber (5) is designed with an accordingly larger width than the microchannels on the fluid guidance plate (1). This could have a negative effect on the mass transfer in the gas phase. Therefore, the reaction chamber (5) is preferably equipped with ramps (13), which in particular are arranged in a staggered pattern, and which improve the mass transfer.
The assignment and distribution of the liquid as well as of the gas occurs via horizontal distribution channels and can occur from the same side or from opposite sides of the reactor. The liquid as well as the gaseous components of the reaction mixture can be discharged together or separately via horizontal channels.
If the reaction takes place under pressure, the partition walls (18) serve to avoid a bending of the reaction plate 1. Thus, pressures of 10−3 bar to 300 bar, preferably 1 to 10 bar can be applied.
Using combined heating and evacuating, low-boiling components of the reaction mixture can be removed from the liquid phase through vaporization and be discharged together with the gaseous phase.
The reaction conditions (thread thickness, concentration, temperature, pH value, flow rates) can be controlled using sensors.
The liquid reaction mixture flows from the main inlet tube (2) through branch-offs (3) into the individual reactor units. A uniform distribution of the flow across the entire width of the fluid guidance plate (1) can be achieved in a number of ways:
Preferably, a further pressure-loss barrier is installed at the lower end of the capillary thread, in order to also ensure uniform flow for the liquid discharge. This avoids that the reaction chamber (5) is flooded and ensures a uniform distribution of the residence time of the liquid in the microreactor according to the invention.
The pressure-loss barriers fulfill a further function. They simultaneously ensure that the contact between liquid and gas only stretches over the tempered area.
The reaction gas enters the reactor unit via the bore (9) that branches off from the reaction gas inlet tube (8). From there, the gas flows into the gas distribution channel (10), which, together with the bottleneck (11), ensures a uniform distribution across the width of the fluid guidance plate (1). The bottleneck (11) causes a higher pressure loss than the gas distribution channel (10), so that gas flows with the same value per unit length at every point. The following possibilities can be used as alternatives for achieving a uniform flow distribution of the gas:
Preferably, a further uniform distribution collector is installed at the lower exit from the reaction chamber (5), in order to ensure a uniformly distributed, homogenous flow field in the lower part of the reaction chamber (5).
It is advantageous if the liquid and the gas phase are discharged separately. However, if extremely short residence times of the liquid phase are required, the two phases can be discharged together.
In order to ensure sufficient mass transfer in the gas phase in cases where a minimum turnover is required, the residence time of the reaction gas in the reaction chamber should be sufficiently long. This means that the width of the gas chamber can amount to up to 10 mm. In such wide channels, experience has shown that diffusion alone is not strong enough for allowing each reactant molecule to contact the liquid phase. In order to intensify the mass transfer, special ramps (13) are installed on the side of the reaction chamber (5) opposite to the fluid guidance plate (1). They have the effect that the boundary layer flow is guided away from the wall in the direction of the microcapillary plate. In order to further intensify this effect, they are usually arranged in a staggered pattern.
On the liquid side, the thickness of the capillary thread and the microstructuring of the fluid guidance plate (1) significantly influence the mass transfer. The average capillary thread thickness adjusts itself according the liquid charge and the liquid properties (such as density, viscosity, etc.). The higher the selected throughput, the larger the thread thickness and thus also the distance that the reactants in the liquid have to diffusively cover.
The fluid guidance plate (1) can be cooled or heated on its rear side, whereby a liquid or gaseous heat-transporting medium flows through channels of 0.5 to 2 mm width. The supply of the heat transfer medium occurs via an inlet tube (15) and bores (16) that branch off to the individual reaction plates (1). The discharge of the heat transfer medium occurs via the heat transfer medium collector (19), bores (20) and the outlet tube (21). The interaction between the heat transfer medium distribution channel (17) and the heat transfer channels (23) causes a good uniform flow distribution of the heat transfer medium, especially when the inlet tube (15) and the outlet tube (21) are arranged diagonally in the intermediate plate (6), which is not depicted in
Tempering of the reaction layer is possible from the rear using liquid or gaseous mediums in a temperature range from −80° C. to +500° C., preferably from −60° C. to +300° C. As an alternative to tempering the fluid guidance plate using fluid tempering mediums, a solid, e.g. an electrically heated block or a Peltier element, can be used as a tempering element.
Using internal parallelization, i.e. the connection of several individual reactors to form a rector block, the turnover amount can be increased into the technically relevant range. A reactor is already created by combining a bottom plate (22) with a fluid guidance plate (1) and a top plate (12). By adding an intermediate plate (6), and a further fluid guidance plate (1), an additional reactor module is created.
The individual plates or layers can be joined using screw connections or clamping devices, if a detachable assembly is required. You can also use welding, bonding, gluing, soldering or riveting, if such a reaction system is not to be changed once it has been assembled.
A further object of the invention is a process for manufacturing a microreactor according to the invention for carrying out chemical reactions, which comprises the following steps:
The structuring in steps (a) and/or (b) can be achieved by etching, laser and water jet cutting and drilling, punching and embossing, milling, planing, micro spark erosion, punch drawing, punching and drilling, injection molding and sintering as well as with LIGA-technology and combinations of these.
As the manufacture of microstructures usually is a costly and elaborate process, the manufacture of the fluid guidance plates (1) in step (b) is preferably carried out using two elements. On a first plate (41), breakthroughs are created instead of notches, so that a grid is formed. This is attached onto a second, unstructured plate (42). The two elements can be made from the same or from different materials.
The layers have to be stacked in such a fashion that on one hand, the fluid guiding structures and the partition walls are completely maintained. On the other hand, the layers have to be joined in such a way that they are completely sealed against liquids and gases.
The materials from which the plates are made mainly depend on the substances to be processed and the chemical processes to be carried out. In general, materials suitable for chemistry such as metal, glass, ceramics, plastics and semiconductor material as well as combinations of these come into consideration. Preferably, the following materials are used: graphite, ceramics, plastics, catalytically active materials, stainless steel or tantalum. Combinations of different materials are possible.
In a further, preferred optimal realization of the microreactor according to the invention, catalytically active metals form the material of the fluid guidance plate (1) or are applied to it, e.g. by vaporization or coating. For catalyzed gas-liquid reactions, a close contact between gas, liquid and catalyst (=metal surface) is especially important. In the equipment according to the invention, close contact is ensured by very thin films of liquid.
If a shorter residence time of the liquid on the reaction plate is desired, the plate can be installed at an angle of ≦0° preferably of 45° to 90°, in particular 60° to 90°, mostly preferred at about 90° to the horizontal plane.
In total, the invention provides a miniaturized reaction system with a modular structure, which, due to its microstructure, is suitable for carrying out reactions in which at least one fluid reaction partner reacts with at least one gaseous reaction partner and which, due to the implementation of a variable number of intermediate plates (6) and fluid guidance plates (1), allows the amount of throughput to be freely scaled.
The microreactor system according to the invention features a number of advantages that are of great importance for carrying out such reactions and are not found in conventional microreactors or in vertical tube reactors:
Object of the invention thus is a procedure, in particular a continuous procedure, for carrying out chemical reactions between a reaction partner in liquid form and a gaseous reaction partner in spaces that are formed by two or several plates or layers of a reactor according to the invention to produce one or more gaseous, liquid, solved and/or suspended reaction products, characterized by the fact that the fluid reaction partner flows solely due to the influence of gravity and/or capillary forces in one essentially uninterrupted capillary thread along the surface of at least one plate or layer and thereby comes into contact and reacts with the gaseous reaction partner.
Usually, the reactants, of which there are at least two, are made to react in the presence of at least one thinner in a microreactor according to the invention. Preferred thinners are halogenated aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons such as for example hexane, cyclohexane, dichloromethane, tetrachloromethane, 1,2,2-trifluor-1,1,2-trichloroethane, benzene, toluene or chlorobenzene; or ethers such as for example, diethyl ether, tert-butyl methyl ether, dioxane or tetrahydrofuran; ketones or amides such as for example acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, dimethyl formamide or N-methylpyrrolidone; or alcohols such as for example methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol or butanol; or acetonitrile or water or mixtures of these thinners.
Examples for reactions according to the invention are reductions of reducible chemical compounds with gaseous hydrogen, in particular catalytic hydrogenation of organic nitrogen compounds.
Amines are often produced through the reduction of nitrogen compounds. Often, the catalytic hydrogenation with hydrogen using a heterogeneous catalyst is the only practicable and gentlest method.
In conventional operating mode in a vibration reactor, stirrer tank or in autoclaves, a number of problems arise:
Due to unstable protected groups, the temperatures have to be kept at a low level, which causes the reaction time to increase significantly. Also, an additional work step is necessary for removing the catalyst from the reaction solution and recycling it after the reaction. Due to the generation of heat, only strongly diluted solutions can be used.
Using the microreactor according to the invention has the following advantages:
Further examples of processes according to the invention are the halogenation of halogenatable chemical compounds with gaseous chlorine or fluorine, in particular the chlorination of aliphatic carboxylic acids and the fluorination of aromatics.
The chlorination of acetic acid is conventionally carried out in bubble column reactors. In these, besides the desired product of monochloro acetic acid, over 3% of dichloro acetic acid is produced. This has to be separated in elaborate and costly reprocessing procedures. In the described reaction in a microcapillary reactor, the share of 1,1-dichloro acetic acid can be reduced to under 0.05%.
Direct fluorination with elementary fluorine is the alternative possibility to the Balz-Schiemann reaction and to the Halex process for the selective fluorination of aromatics. The main problems with this are found on one side in the high reactivity of the elementary fluorine, which besides unspecific substitution also adds to the aromatics, and on the other side in the high exothermicity of reactions with elementary fluorine, which make these reactions hard to control. By operating with microcapillary reactors, an optimum temperature control and thus a high selectivity with minimum risk is possible.
Further examples of processes according to the invention are alkoxylations, especially the ethoxylation of alkoxylatable chemical compounds, especially the reaction of carboxylic acid, phenols and alcohols with gaseous epoxides.
Different catalysts are used for ethoxylating fatty alcohols or fatty acids. Alkoxylations, e.g. the ethoxylation of fat derivates, are carried out with catalysts that are as cost-effective as possible and basic (e.g. alkali hydroxide).
The conversion of fatty alcohols, in particular lauryl alcohol, with ethylene oxide in the microcapillary reactor according to the invention has the following advantages, besides an extremely narrow distribution of molecular weights:
Further examples of procedures according to the invention are oxidations of oxidatable chemical compounds with gaseous oxygen or ozone, in particular melting oxidation of polyethylene wax, reactions with phosgene as well as reactions with hydrogen cyanide.
In order to facilitate the understanding of the invention at hand, the following illustrative examples for possible reactor types are shown. The invention at hand is not restricted to these specific optimal realizations but comprises the full extent of the patent claims.
The reaction is carried out in a microreactor according to
23.7 g (0.01 mole) 1-ethoxalyl-2(4-nitrophenyl)-hydrazine are dissolved in 150 ml methanol and 50 ml tetrahydrofuran. Oxygen is abandoned using an excess pressure of 0.1 bar. The solution is guided over a graphite plate coated with palladium at a flow velocity of 5 ml/min at 50° C. The reaction product is removed from the equipment and the thinners are evaporated until yellow crystals are separated out. These are washed using isopropyl and diethyl ether and dried in a vacuum. The product 1-ethoxalyl-2(4-aminophenyl)-hydrazine is created in quantitative amounts.
CH3—COOH+Cl2→Cl—CH2—COOH+HCl
The reaction is carried out in a microreactor according to
Acetic acid as well as 15 mole-% acetyl chloride are continuously fed together into a microcapillary reactor. The liquid throughput is set to 45 g/min. The temperature is set to 180° C. Chlorine gas is passed through the reactor at a uniform flow rate such that the share of chlorine in the exhaust gas flow is less than 0.1%. The exhaust gas and the product are discharged together from the microcapillary reactor into a sedimentation container, where fluid and gaseous phases are separated from each other. By reacting with water, any remaining acid chlorides and anhydrides in the liquid raw acid are converted into free acids. The hydrogen chloride produced is let off. The share of monochloro acetic acid in the liquid reaction product amounts to about 85%. The acetic acid that was not converted (share 11-12%) is distilled off at 150 mbar and 80° C. The share of dichloro acetic acid is under 0.05%. Further cleansing is therefore not necessary.
The reaction is carried out in a microreactor according to
2.5 g 4-benzylpyridine are dissolved in 50 ml 1,2,2,-trifluor-1,1,2,trichloroethane. The liquid flow rate amounts to 1 ml/min. Fluorine (10% F2 in N2) is fed through the reactor in the opposite direction to the capillary threads at an excess pressure of 2 bar. The reaction is carried out at −25° C. The organic phase is washed with water, 1N HCl and saltwater. After drying with Na2SO4, volatile components are distilled off using a rotary evaporator. A yellow oil is produced. The yield of 2-fluorine-4-benzylpyridine amounts to 50%.
The reactions are carried out in a microreactor according to
Lauryl alcohol with 1 weight-% catalyst (NaOH, dissolved in the lauryl alcohol) are continuously fed into a microcapillary reactor. The liquid throughput is set to 2 g/min. Gaseous ethylene oxide is fed through in a direction opposite to the liquid flow, at an excess pressure of 1 bar. The reaction product is removed and the catalyst filtered off.
By carrying out the reaction at an angle of 45° and the longer residence time caused by this, a complete conversion can also be achieved at lower temperatures. This lowers the by-product content, at the same time the range of the molecular weight distribution is widened.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 36 602 | Jul 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/08622 | 7/25/2001 | WO | 00 | 1/27/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/68257 | 9/20/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3881701 | Schoenman et al. | May 1975 | A |
4222671 | Gilmore | Sep 1980 | A |
4702073 | Melconian | Oct 1987 | A |
4728502 | Hamill | Mar 1988 | A |
4748002 | Neimark et al. | May 1988 | A |
4894146 | Giddings | Jan 1990 | A |
5122345 | Tabor et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5209906 | Watkins et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250263 | Manz | Oct 1993 | A |
5273715 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5288468 | Church et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5324483 | Cody et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5399317 | Stolowitz | Mar 1995 | A |
5463564 | Agrafiotis | Oct 1995 | A |
5468643 | Su et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482862 | LaPack et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499650 | McArthur et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5516423 | Conoby et al. | May 1996 | A |
5534328 | Ashmead et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5580523 | Bard | Dec 1996 | A |
5595712 | Harbster et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5641400 | Kaltenbach et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644395 | Folta | Jul 1997 | A |
5658537 | Dugan | Aug 1997 | A |
5681534 | Neves | Oct 1997 | A |
5690763 | Ashmead et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5698485 | Bruck et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705018 | Hartley | Jan 1998 | A |
5727618 | Mundinger et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730947 | Chaussonnet | Mar 1998 | A |
5741466 | Bodnaras | Apr 1998 | A |
5803600 | Schubert et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811062 | Wegeng et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5842787 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5928880 | Wilding et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5939024 | Robertson | Aug 1999 | A |
5961932 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976472 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993750 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6036355 | Yant et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036927 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6063019 | Wade | May 2000 | A |
6126723 | Drost et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149882 | Guan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6171865 | Weigl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180081 | Poschmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190034 | Nielsen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192596 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221226 | Kopf-Sill | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264900 | Schubert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6494614 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537506 | Schwalbe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6656423 | Joslyn | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701774 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6827095 | O'Connor et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20020042140 | Hagemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045265 | Bergh et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020080563 | Pence et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020151080 | Dasgupta | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170976 | Bergh et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
960 183 | Mar 1957 | DE |
0796654 | Mar 1997 | EP |
WO 8702139 | Apr 1987 | WO |
WO 9300625 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9838487 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9904892 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9855812 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9920395 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0034728 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0051720 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0062914 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0062919 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0141916 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0166245 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0168257 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0193998 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040156762 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |