The present invention relates to microanalysis devices and methods for moving fluids in such devices.
The idea is applicable to (but not limited to) micro-analysis systems that are based on microchannels formed in a rotatable, usually plastic, disc, often called a “centrifugal rotor” or “lab on a chip”. Such discs can be used to perform analysis and separation on small quantities of fluids. In order to reduce costs it is desirable that the discs should be not restricted to use with just one type of reagent or fluid but should be able to work with a variety of fluids. Furthermore it is often desirable during the preparation of samples that the disc permits the user to dispense accurate volumes of any desired combination of fluids or samples without modifying the disc. Due to the small widths of the microchannels, any air bubbles present between two samples of fluids in the microchannels can act as separation barriers or can block the microchannel and thereby can prevent a fluid from entering a microchannel that it is supposed to enter. In order to overcome this problem U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,643 teaches the use of a centrifugal rotor which has microchannels that have cross sectional areas which are sufficiently large that unwanted air can be vented out of the microchannel at the same time as the fluid enters the microchannel.
An object of the present invention is to provide a structure for a centrifugal rotor and a method for using such a centrifugal rotor, which structure and which method permits the reliable transport of fluids in the centrifugal rotor.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a structure for a centrifugal rotor and a method for using such a centrifugal rotor, which structure and which method permits the accurate metering of fluids in the centrifugal rotor.
The present invention achieves the objects of the invention by means of a structure having the features of claim 1. A method for using such a structure to achieve the objects of the invention has the features of claim 5.
The present invention will be illustrated by a non-limiting example of an embodiment by means of the following figures, where:
a shows the peripheral part of a centrifugal rotor having five radially extending microchannel structures K7-K12 in accordance with the present invention;
b shows an enlarged view of one microchannel structure from
c shows an enlarged view of a sample volume-defining structure in the microchannel structure of
d shows an enlarged view of the chamber area plus chambers for the disposal of waste fluids, wherein variations in depth are shown by cross-hatching;
a and 2b show the structure of
a and 3b shows the addition of a second fluid to a volume-defining chamber;
a and 4b show the replacement of the first fluid in the chamber by said second fluid;
The microchannel structures (K7-K12) in accordance with the present invention are shown in
The microchannels may be formed by micro-machining methods in which the micro-channels are micro-machined into the surface of the disc, and a cover plate, for example, a plastic film is adhered to the surface so as to enclose the channels. The microfluidic disc (D) has a thickness which is much less than its diameter and is intended to be rotated around a central hole so that centrifugal force causes fluid arranged in the microchannels in the disc to flow towards the outer periphery of the disc. In the embodiment of the present invention shown in
Thus, fluid can flow from the inlet opening (3) via an entrance port (6) into a volume-defining structure (7) and from there into a first arm of a U-shaped chamber (10). The volume-defining structure (7) is connected to a waste outlet for removing excess fluid, for example, radially extending waste channel (8) which waste channel (8) is preferably connected to the annular outer waste channel (2). The waste channel (8) preferably has a vent (9) that opens into open air via the top surface of the disk. Vent (9) is situated at the part of the waste channel (8) that is closest to the centre of the disc and prevents fluid in the waste channel (8) from being sucked back into the volume-defining structure (7).
The chamber (10) has a first, inlet arm (10a) connected at its lower end to a base (10c) which is also connected to the lower end of a second, outlet arm (10b). The chamber (10) may have sections I, II, III, IV which have different depths, for example each section could be shallower than the preceding section in the direction towards the outlet end, or alternatively sections I and III could be shallower than sections II and IV, or vice versa. A restricted waste outlet (11), i.e. a narrow waste channel, is provided between the chamber (10) and the waste chamber (4). This makes the resistance to fluid flow through the chamber (10) greater than the resistance to fluid flow through the path that goes through volume-defining structure (7) and waste channel (8).
Due to the relatively large width of the waste chamber (4), the top and bottom surfaces of the waste chamber (4) are preferably separated by one or more supports (12) to ensure that the top and bottom surfaces of the microfluidic device do not bend inwards towards the waste chamber (4) and thereby change its volume.
As shown in
In addition to the application area at the inlet (3) of the structure, there may also be an additional application area (13) that opens out into the top surface of the disc and is connected to the entrance port (6). This additional application area (13) can be used when it is desired to add different reagents or samples to each of the different microstructures (K7-K12).
There is preferably also a vent (14) to open air in the chamber (10). A hydrophobic break is preferably provided at the connection (16) of the chamber (10) to the volume-defining structure (7) in order to guide fluid into arm (7b)
The outer annular waste channel (2) may be sectioned so as to collect waste from a selected number of closely located microchannel structures.
Hydrophobic breaks can be introduced into the microchannel structures (K7-K12), for example by marking with an over-head pen (permanent ink) (Snowman pen, Japan), and suitable places for such breaks (shown by crosshatching in the figures) include: (a) between microchannel structure inlets (3) in the inner annular application channel (1), (b) each opening (15) into the outer annular waste channel (i.e. the openings of the waste chambers) and, (c) if present, also the radial waste channels (5) which connect the inner annular application channel (1) and the outer annular waste channel (2), and also the waste channel (8) which guides away excess fluid from the volume-defining structure (7).
The purpose of the hydrophobic breaks is to prevent capillary action from drawing the fluid into undesired directions. Hydrophobic breaks can be overcome by centrifugal force i.e. by spinning the disc at high speed.
If the sample to be analysed is in the form or cells or sedimenting material or particles then it can be held in the lower U-channel by a particle filter (21) (shown by a dotted line in
A first reagent or sample fluid X can be introduced into the chamber (10) by connecting a source (not shown) of the fluid X to the common annular inner application channel (1) from where it flows by capillary action and/or, if the disc is spun, centrifugal force to the lower U-bend. If the volume of fluid X which is introduced into common annular inner application channel (1) is in excess (i.e. is greater than the volume of the chamber (10) up to the level of the restricted channel (11) (distance L4 in
When it is time to add a new reagent or sample fluid Y, then fluid Y is added by the common annular inner application channel (1) (or, alternatively, as shown in
This can prevent the second fluid Y from flowing by capillary action into the chamber (10) and can also prevent mixing of the fluids X and Y. The vent (9), which is open to atmospheric pressure, makes it easier for the second fluid Y to flow towards the waste channel (5). Gentle, i.e. low speed, spinning of the disc (D) empties the excess fluid Y from waste channel (5), leaving the volume-defining structure (7) full of fluid Y, as shown in
All of the first fluid X in the chamber (10) can be displaced by the second fluid Y by spinning the disc if the volume of the second fluid in the volume-defining structure (7) and any air between the first and second fluids is equal to or greater than the volume of the first fluid X in the chamber (10). This can be achieved by ensuring that the volume of the volume-defining structure (7) is greater than the volume of the chamber (10). This can be achieved by making the arms (7a) and (7b) of the volume-defining structure longer than the arms of the chamber (10), and/or by making the cross-sectional area of the arms of the volume-defining structure (7) greater than that of the arms of the chamber (10).
In the event that the fluids contain particles and it is desired to hold them in the chamber it is possible to provide the chamber (10) with a particle filter (21) with suitable sized orifices. In the event that it is necessary to only temporarily hold the particles in the chamber (10) then the sections I, II, III, IV of the chamber (10) which have different depths can be used to temporarily trap the particles. This is done by increasing the speed of rotation of the disc so that the particles collect at the boundary wall between two sections while the fluid flows over the wall.
In another aspect of the invention, particles can be selectively held in, or flushed out of a chamber (10′), which does not have a particle trap or sections having different depths as shown in
Particles that have been sedimented, or otherwise collected, in the bottom of the chamber (10′) can be drawn out of the chamber (10′) by the meniscus of a fluid which flows out of the chamber (10′). In other words, if there is an air cushion (19′) between the volume-defining structure and the chamber (10′) and this is driven through the chamber, then as the meniscus between the fluid in the chamber and the air cushion passes the particles they are entrained by the meniscus and flow out of the chamber. This can be achieved by choosing a suitably low rate of acceleration of the disc (known as “ramp speed”). If however it is desired to retain the particles in the chamber then it is necessary to ensure that the air cushion is not driven through the chamber (10′) by the fluid in the volume-defining structure when the disc is spun. If a suitably high rate of acceleration of the disc is chosen, it is possible to cause the fluid in the volume-defining structure to flow down the sides of the channel, through the air cushion (19′), without displacing the air cushion (19′). Typically a ramp speed of up to 3500 rpm/s2 transports the particles further in the channel system. With a ramp speed greater than 3500 rpm/s2 the fluid/air interface (meniscus) does not enter the U-chamber and the air bubble stays still or moves in the opposite direction to the centrifugal force. The exact ramping speeds to achieve the desired effect are naturally dependent on the type of fluid used and are most suitably determined by experimentation.
In another embodiment of the invention, as shown in
All the chambers of the present invention can be provided with heating means in the form of a coating as shown crosshatched in
Note that while the embodiments of the invention described above have a chamber leading to a waste chamber, it is of course conceivable that the chamber outlet leads to one or more further chamber(s). Each further chamber may have a plurality of inlets and a plurality of outlets so that samples and reagents may be combined in a chamber. The subsequent results of any process, which has taken place in a chamber, can be dispensed to one or more additional chambers for further processing or sent to the waste channel. An example of this is shown in
The above mentioned examples of conceivable embodiments are intended to illustrate the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope of protection claimed by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP99/10347 | Dec 1999 | WO | international |
0001779 | May 2000 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP00/13145 | 12/22/2000 | WO | 00 | 9/25/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/46465 | 6/28/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3547547 | Anderson | Dec 1970 | A |
4284602 | Kelton et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4330080 | Mathieu | May 1982 | A |
4859420 | Schultz | Aug 1989 | A |
5160702 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5376252 | Ekstrom | Dec 1994 | A |
5591643 | Schembri | Jan 1997 | A |
5690841 | Elderstig | Nov 1997 | A |
5693233 | Schembri | Dec 1997 | A |
5773488 | Allmer | Jun 1998 | A |
5919711 | Boyd et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5962081 | Ohman | Oct 1999 | A |
5995209 | Ohman | Nov 1999 | A |
6002475 | Boyd et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6033914 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6126765 | Ohman | Oct 2000 | A |
6144447 | Ohman | Nov 2000 | A |
6192768 | Wallman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203291 | Stemme | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6299839 | Karunaratne et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322682 | Arvidsson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6454970 | Ohman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499499 | Dantsker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6620478 | Ohman | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632656 | Thomas | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6653625 | Andersson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6717136 | Andersson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728644 | Bielik | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6811736 | Ohman | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6812456 | Andersson | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6812457 | Andersson | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852851 | Tooke et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20020125135 | Derand et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030029724 | Derand et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044322 | Andersson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030047823 | Ohman | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053934 | Andersson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030054563 | Ljungstrom | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064004 | Agren | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082075 | Agren | May 2003 | A1 |
20030094502 | Andersson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129360 | Derand | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146155 | Tooke et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156763 | Soderman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173650 | Larsson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211012 | Bergstrom | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213551 | Derand | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231312 | Sjoberg | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005634 | Kylberg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040055136 | Ohman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058408 | Thomas | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040096867 | Andersson | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099310 | Andersson | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120856 | Andersson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131345 | Kylberg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202579 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050019819 | Tooke et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042770 | Derand et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050141344 | Ekstrand et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179901 | Ostlin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030143114 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |