Exemplary embodiments pertain to heat exchangers and more specifically to high performance louvered fin microchannel heat exchangers performing cooling and dehumidification such as for a furnace-coil evaporator.
An air-cooled fin-type heat exchanger is very well known. Heat exchangers are used for changing the temperature of various working fluids, such as air conditioning refrigerant, an engine coolant, an engine lubricating oil and an automatic transmission fluid, for example. The heat exchanger typically includes a plurality of spaced apart fluid conduits or tubes connected between an inlet tank and an outlet tank, and a plurality of heat exchanging fins disposed between adjacent conduits. Air is directed across the fins of the heat exchanger by a cooling fan or air mover in general. As the air flows across the fins, heat in a fluid flowing through the tubes is conducted through the walls of the tubes, into the fins, and transferred into the air. In the case of comfort cooling applications, humid and warm air moves through the fin-tube matrix resulting in moisture removal as condensate and rejection of the heat into the refrigerant flowing in the tubes.
One of the primary goals in heat exchanger design is to achieve the highest possible thermal efficiency. Thermal efficiency is measured by dividing the amount of heat that is transferred by the heat exchanger under a given set of conditions (amount of airflow, temperature difference between the air and fluid, and the like) by the theoretical maximum possible heat transfer under those conditions. Thus, an increase in the air-side heat transfer coefficient results in increased thermal capacity and hence higher thermal efficiency. For heat exchangers operating as evaporators, reduction in retained condensate and lower water film thickness on fin surfaces also reduces thermal resistance and increases rate of heat transfer.
In the case of the louvered serpentine fins in microchannel heat exchangers, the air-side thermal performance and condensate drainage is intimately dependent on the fin design at large and the louver geometry. Over the decades, the louvered-fin design has undergone many slight modifications to optimize the existing parameters that describe the fin. Louver width has varied, louver angle has varied, bend radii have improved, louver patterns have been experimented with, and fin materials have become more versatile and thinner. But through all the experimentation and slight improvements, the design of the louver transition zone itself has remained relatively untouched due to its complexity. It is the louver transition that determines the extent to which the louver length can be achieved. The larger the louver length greater the air-side heat transfer coefficient and thermal capacity. At the same time, an optimized louver transition helps reduce air-side pressure drop and lowers the risk of condensate blow-off. The fin-tip bend radii also present a challenge for maximizing the louver length. Conventional semi-circular profiles with generous radii conflict with efforts to increase louver length. Prior art flat-top fin designs tend to alleviate the bend radii limitations, but present significant manufacturing challenges and poor braze quality which have prevented them from wide adoption by the industry. Newer approaches are needed to circumvent these technical difficulties.
In furnace-coil evaporators, it may be desirable to replace tube-and-fin coils with microchannel heat exchangers to provide enhanced performance and cost benefits. The configuration of the microchannel heat exchangers should be optimized however to maximize the performance and costs benefits.
A microchannel heat exchanger including: a plurality of fin segments, each respectively defined between a pair of lower and upper fin tips, and wherein at each fin tip, the fin segments include inner facing surfaces and outer facing surfaces; each fin segment including louvers, each louver including an upper transition region at an upper louver end adjacent an upper fin tip, a lower transition region at a lower louver end adjacent a lower fin tip, and a straight region extending between the upper transition region and the lower transition region, wherein: the transition regions along the inner facing surface at each fin tip include a first transition surface including a first transition length, disposed at a first transition angle to the fin segment; the transition regions along the outer facing surface at each fin tip include a second transition surface including a second transition length, disposed at a second transition angle to the fin segment; and one or more of: the first transition length is longer than the second transition length; and the first transition angle is smaller than the second transition angle.
In addition to one or more features of the microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the microchannel heat exchanger further includes at least one tube brazed along at least one of: the lower fin tips or the upper fin tips.
In addition to one or more features of the microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the microchannel heat exchanger further includes a fluid header and a gas header fluidly connected to the tube at opposing longitudinal ends of the tube.
In addition to one or more features of the microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the fin segments, between the upper and lower fin tips, are configured at an acute angle.
In addition to one or more features of the microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, each fin tip includes a rounded profile.
Further disclosed is another microchannel heat exchanger including: a plurality of fin segments, each respectively defined between a pair of lower and upper fin tips, and wherein at each fin tip, the fin segments include inner facing surfaces and outer facing surfaces; each fin segment including louvers, each louver including an upper transition region at an upper louver end adjacent an upper fin tip, a lower transition region at a lower louver end adjacent a lower fin tip, and a straight region extending between the upper transition region and the lower transition region; wherein, at each of the fin tips: one of the fin segments is longer than another one of the fin segments, and the respective fin tip includes a straight profile extending between the pair of the fin segments, thereby forming a trapezoidal fin profile.
In addition to one or more features of the another microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the fin segments each include louvers formed thereon, wherein louvers formed on longer ones of the fin segments are longer than louvers formed on shorter ones of the fin segments.
In addition to one or more features of the another microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the another microchannel heat exchanger further includes at least one tube brazed along at least one of: the lower fin tips or the upper fin tips.
In addition to one or more features of the another microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the another microchannel heat exchanger further includes a fluid header and a gas header fluidly connected to the tube at opposing longitudinal ends of the tube.
In addition to one or more features of the another microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the fin segments are parallel to each other.
Disclosed is a further microchannel heat exchanger including: a plurality of fin segments, each respectively defined between a pair of lower and upper fin tips, and wherein at each fin tip, the fin segments include inner facing surfaces and outer facing surfaces; each fin segment including louvers, each louver including an upper transition region at an upper louver end adjacent an upper fin tip, a lower transition region at a lower louver end adjacent a lower fin tip, and a straight region extending between the upper transition region and the lower transition region, wherein: for each fin segment, the louvers include an inner louver bank disposed between the fin inner end and a fin bisecting axis, and an outer louver bank disposed between the fin outer end and the fin bisecting axis; and the upper and lower louver ends of the inner louver bank define an inner-side louver angle by that is acute relative to the longitudinal direction, such that each louver slot forms an air scoop, and wherein the outer louver bank mirrors the inner louver bank about the fin bisecting axis.
In addition to one or more features of the further microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the further microchannel heat exchanger includes at least one tube brazed along at least one of: the lower fin tips or the upper fin tips.
In addition to one or more features of the further microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the further microchannel heat exchanger includes a fluid header and a gas header fluidly connected to the tube at opposing longitudinal ends of the tube.
In addition to one or more features of the further microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the inner and outer louver banks have a same span along the depth direction and are spaced apart from each other by a louver gap.
In addition to one or more features of the further microchannel heat exchanger, or as an alternate, the further microchannel heat exchanger includes one or more of: a ratio of louver width to louver length of between 0.06 to 0.32; the ratio of louver width to louver length of between 0.10 to 0.18; a ratio of louver length to fin height of between 0.85 and 0.95; the ratio of louver length to fin height of between 0.88 and 0.92; a ratio of fin height to fin thickness of between 40 and 200; the ratio of fin height to fin thickness of between 88 and 102; a ratio of louver transition length to fin thickness of between 1 and 10; the ratio of louver transition length to fin thickness of between 3 and 5; a louver transition angle of between 15 degrees and 50 degrees; a ratio of louver width and fin thickness is between 5 and 35; the ratio of louver width and fin thickness is between 10 and 15; a ratio of fin tip radius to fin pitch of between 0.068 to 0.42; and the ratio of fin tip radius to fin pitch of between 0.2 to 0.25.
Further disclosed is an alternate microchannel heat exchanger including: a plurality of fin segments, each respectively defined between a pair of lower and upper fin tips, and wherein at each fin tip, the fin segments include inner facing surfaces and outer facing surfaces; each fin segment including louvers, each louver including an upper transition region at an upper louver end adjacent an upper fin tip, a lower transition region at a lower louver end adjacent a lower fin tip, and a straight region extending between the upper transition region and the lower transition region, wherein at least one tube is connected along at least one of the lower fin tips or the upper fin tips, the tube extending from an upstream tube end to a downstream tube end; wherein the tube is internally segmented by webs to form ports, wherein the ports at opposing ends define end ports and the ports therebetween define internal ports, wherein the internal ports define include a rectangular cross section.
In addition to one or more features of the alternate microchannel heat exchanger, or as an option thereto, the tube is brazed to the fin tips.
In addition to one or more features of the alternate microchannel heat exchanger, or as an option thereto, the alternate microchannel heat exchanger includes a fluid header and a gas header fluidly connected to the tube at opposing longitudinal ends of the tube.
In addition to one or more features of the alternate microchannel heat exchanger, or as an option thereto, the end ports include semi-rounded profiles.
In addition to one or more features of the alternate microchannel heat exchanger, or as an option thereto, the alternate microchannel heat exchanger includes one or more of: a port height of between 0.2 mm and 1.2 mm; the port height of between 0.6 mm and 0.8 mm; a port width of between 0.2 mm and 2 mm; the port width of between 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm; an end port width of between 0.2 mm and 2 mm; the end port width of between 0.2 mm and 0.6 mm; a port corner radius of between 0.1 mm and 0.3 mm; a ratio of nose thickness to web thickness of between 0.5 and 5; the ratio of nose thickness to web thickness of between 1.5 and 2.5; a ratio of total web thickness to tube width of between 0.20 and 0.40; the ratio of total web thickness to tube width of between 0.28 and 0.32; a ratio of tube wall thickness to tube height of between 0.16 and 0.40; and the ratio of tube wall thickness to tube height of between 0.21 and 0.25.
Additional one or more microchannel heat exchangers combining aspects of one or more of the microchannel heat exchangers identified herein are within the scope of the disclosure.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of this disclosure is thereby intended.
Turning to
The tubes, referred to generally as 90, may extend between the upstream and downstream headers 102A, 102B and may be spaced apart from each other in the axial direction 104. A width of the tubes 90 defines a flow depth direction 109 aligned with the airflow direction.
The microchannel heat exchanger 100 includes fins, referred to generally as 86. The fins 86 may be brazed to the tubes 90. As shown, the fins 86 may define a periodic waveform. The fins 86 may be upstream fins 86A that extend between the upstream header 102A and the bend section 40A. The fins 86 may be downstream fins 86B that extend between the downstream header 102B and the bend section 40A. The upstream and downstream fins 86A, 86B may be spaced apart from each other in the longitudinal direction 120 parallel to tube axis and aligned with refrigerant flow direction. Each fin 86 may have an upstream fin end 110a and a downstream fin end 110b spaced apart in a longitudinal direction 120.
Turning to
Fin apex tips, or fin tips, referred to generally as 160, which may include lower fin tips generally referred to as 160A, may be spaced apart from each other in a longitudinal direction 120 by a fin pitch 170. Upper fin tips, generally referred to as 160B may also be spaced apart from each other in the longitudinal direction 120 by the fin pitch 170. The lower and upper fin tips 160A, 160B may be spaced apart from each other along the axial direction 104 by a tube pitch 180 corresponding to a shortest distance between two adjacent tubes. A length of the fin 86 between the lower and upper fin tips 160A, 160B, which is at an acute angle to the axial direction 104, defines the fin height 185. As can be appreciated, for a fin 86 having a triangular wave form (shown in
With reference to
Each fin segment 190 may define louvers, referred to generally as 200. As shown in
As shown in
For each fin segment 190, the louvers 200 may define an inner louver bank 260A distributed between the fin inner end 130 and a fin length bisecting axis (or fin bisecting axis) 270 that extends along the fin height to bisect the fin 86. The louvers 200 may define an outer louver bank 260B distributed between the fin outer end 140 and the fin length bisecting axis 270. The inner and outer louver banks 260A, 260B each may extend along a same span 280, otherwise referred to as an interrupted length, with an interrupted louver gap 290 therebetween, otherwise referred to as a turn-around louver, centered on the fin length bisecting axis 270, in the depth direction 109.
The inner louver bank 260A may open, or becomes longer, toward the fin inner end 130. This configuration defines an inner-side louver angle 300 by upper and lower louver ends 250A, 250B that may be acute relative to the axial direction 104, such that the louver slot 220 forms an outwardly splayed aperture, or air scoop. The outer louver bank 260B may be configured to essentially mirror the inner louver bank 260A.
As shown in
As shown in
In addition, between each of the lower and upper fin tips 160A, 160B a contour of the louver slat 210 and slot 220 may define transition regions generally referred to as 310, including an upper transition region 310A at the upper louver end 250A and a lower transition region 310B, at the lower louver end 250B. A straight region 310C may extend between the upper and lower transition regions 310A, 310B.
According to an embodiment, at each fin tip 160, the transition region 310 along inner facing ones of the segment surfaces 195 (facing each other) of adjacent ones of the fin segments 190 may be referred to as inner facing transition regions. These regions may be defined by a first transition surface 350A having a first transition length 360A, and being disposed at a first acute transition angle (or first transition angle) 370A to the respective fin segment 190. The transition region 310 along outer facing ones of the segment surfaces 195 (facing away from each other) of adjacent ones of the fin segments 190 may be referred to as outer facing transition regions. These regions may be defined by a second transition surface 350B having a second transition length 360B, and being disposed at a second acute transition angle (or second transition angle) 370B to the respective fin segment 190. The first transition surface 350A may be longer than the second transition surface 350B and the first acute transition angle 370A may be less than the second acute transition angle 370B in certain instances. The transition lengths (LTl) 360A, 360B, are related to the fin thickness (Ft) 230 and the ratio of the transition lengths relative to the fin thickness, LTl/Ft, is between 1 and 10 with the most preferred range being between 3 and 5. The transition angles 370A, 370B range from about 15 degrees to 50 degrees.
It should be appreciated that the following ranges of the parameters, and ratios thereof, may apply for the disclosed embodiments. Referring to
Each fin 86 includes a plurality of through openings or louvers comprising slat 210 and slot 220 arrayed along a lateral extent of the fin. The louvers improve heat transfer also assist reducing water retention of the heat exchanger by providing alternate passages for moisture and condensate to drain through the microchannel heat exchanger 100. It is desired to maximize the louver length (Ll) 250 with respect to the fin height (Fh) 185 such that the ratio, (Ll/Fh), is between 0.85 to 0.95 and the preferred range is between 0.88 to 0.92. The louver width (Lw) 240 is related to the louver count and has significant influence on the air-side thermal resistance, pressure drop and condensate drainage. The louvers act to minimize the negative influences of the hydrodynamic boundary layer growth over a plain fin surface by periodic restarts and increase the airflow path within the fin pack by redirecting the airflow laterally once the louver-directed flow is fully established. The ratio of louver width 240 and fin thickness 230, (Lw/Ft), is between 5 to 35 and the preferred range is between 10 to 15. Furthermore, the ratio of louver width 240 and louver length 250, (Lw/Ll), is between 0.06 to 0.32 and the preferred range is between 0.10 to 0.18. The louver angle 300 for the microchannel heat exchanger 100 is between 45° and 55° and the preferred louver angle 300 being 50° as applicable for the disclosed embodiments
Turning to
As shown in
The adjoining pair of fin segments 190A, 190B may extend in the axial direction 104 approximately the same distance from the fin center 400. A straight segment 410 may be defined between the adjoining pair of the fin segments 190A, 190B. This configuration may form alternating back to back (long side), and front to front (short side), trapezoidal fin profiles, with a dashed line 420 schematically completing the trapezoidal shape, and element 425 labelling an inside of the trapezoidal profile. In this embodiment, gaps 430 may be formed between the straight segments 410 and the tubes 90 may be filled with brazing material 440 during the brazing process.
Turning to
The tubes 90 may be connected to the fin 86 as indicated (e.g., using any suitable brazing technique, etc.). The tubes 90 may extend from an upstream tube end 90A at the fluid header to a downstream tube end 90B at the gas header (as shown in
The tubes 90 may be internally segmented into ports 530 extending in the longitudinal direction 120. The ports 530 may be respectively separated by webs 540, or divider walls, extending in along the axial direction 104 between the inner and outer tube surfaces 510A, 510B. The webs 540 may be spaced apart from each other in the depth direction 109. The ports 530 may define internal ports 550 spaced apart from the first and second tube ends 500A, 500B. The internal ports 550 may define rectangular or square cross sections (or profiles). The ports 530 may define end ports 550A, 550B respectively at the first and second tube ends 500A, 500B. The end ports 550A, 550B may define semi-rounded, D-shape cross sections (or profiles), defining nose-cones having an outer radius, otherwise referred to as a nose-cone radius. The ports may have a height extending in the longitudinal direction 120 and a width extending in the depth direction 109.
Referring to
With the above disclosed embodiments, in furnaces, tube-and-fin (RTPF) coils may be replaced with microchannel heat exchangers (MCHX) to provide enhanced performance and cost benefits. As indicated, features of the MCHX design are as follows: (a) a louver length that maximizes thermal performance, e.g., by providing a louver length to fin height ratio of greater than 80%, and preferably up to 95%; (b) a fin geometry that minimizes condensate retention due capillarity; (c) a high louver angle that promote free-draining; (d) an integral tube-pitch to maximize heat transfer surface area within a cabinet; and (e) trapezoidal flat-top fin shape with minimum corner radius for enhancing braze quality while facilitating minimum condensate retention. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the present disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, element components, and/or groups thereof.
While the present disclosure has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this present disclosure, but that the present disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/104,844 filed Oct. 23, 2020, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4756362 | Kudoh | Jul 1988 | A |
5329988 | Juger | Jul 1994 | A |
5669438 | Beales | Sep 1997 | A |
5787972 | Beamer | Aug 1998 | A |
6253840 | Kuroyanagi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6907919 | Zhang | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6988538 | Merkys et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7921904 | Matter et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8333088 | Taras et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8408283 | Kolb | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439104 | De La Cruz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
9115939 | Huazhao et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9574827 | Troutman | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9752833 | Gao et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9803935 | Kamada et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9863714 | Seo et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10168083 | Wang et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10415887 | Liu et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10422588 | Smith et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10619932 | Adomat | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20040251004 | Stoynoff, Jr. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070012430 | Duke | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090173478 | Beamer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100071868 | Reifel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100258286 | Yuan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110036550 | Jiang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048688 | Leitch | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120227945 | Taras et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130153174 | Taras et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130299142 | Yoshioka | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150000880 | Gosh | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160025424 | Mabuchi | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170356697 | Viehrig | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180231319 | Lee et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190195572 | Jo | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190249925 | Morley et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190285361 | Magnier | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190368831 | Xu | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200096264 | Morimoto | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200103148 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101614501 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101995172 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201844617 | May 2011 | CN |
201876180 | Jun 2011 | CN |
101694360 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202188697 | Apr 2012 | CN |
202255020 | May 2012 | CN |
101865625 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102878851 | Jan 2013 | CN |
202747691 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102252556 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103307924 | Sep 2013 | CN |
102767982 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104807360 | Jul 2015 | CN |
105135753 | Dec 2015 | CN |
205027190 | Feb 2016 | CN |
205536685 | Aug 2016 | CN |
206037490 | Mar 2017 | CN |
206160791 | May 2017 | CN |
109945552 | Jun 2019 | CN |
110094901 | Aug 2019 | CN |
0962736 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2236972 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2769162 | Apr 2013 | EP |
3491323 | Feb 2018 | EP |
2962055 | May 2018 | EP |
2908082 | Mar 2019 | EP |
2369285 | Aug 2020 | EP |
2005075917 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2014029216 | Feb 2014 | WO |
19177430 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Erbay et al.; “Comprehensive Study of Heat Exchangers with Louvered Fins”; Intech; Chapter 4; pp. 61-92. |
Hrnjak et al.; “Effect of Louver Angle on Performance of Heat Exchanger with Serpentine Fins and Flat Tubes in Periodic Frosting”; International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference; Jul. 16-19, 2012; 16 Pages. |
Jang et al.; “Optimum Louver Angle Design for a Louvered Fin Heat Exchanger”; International Journal of the Physical Sciences; vol. 6, No. 28; Nov. 9, 2011; pp. 6422-6438. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220128320 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63104844 | Oct 2020 | US |