1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a microelectromechanical integrated sensor structure having a rotary driving motion. In particular, in the following description reference will be made to a gyroscope (whether uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial), which can possibly operate as an accelerometer (whether uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial).
2. Description of the Related Art
As is known, microprocessing techniques enable formation of microelectromechanical structures or systems (the so-called MEMS) within layers of semiconductor material, which have been deposited (for example, in the case of a layer of polycrystalline silicon) or grown (for example, in the case of an epitaxial layer) on top of sacrificial layers, which are removed by chemical etching. Inertial sensors, accelerometers and gyroscopes obtained with said technology are encountering an increasing success, for example in the automotive field, in inertial navigation, or in the sector of portable devices.
In particular, integrated semiconductor gyroscopes are known, which are made with MEMS technology. Said gyroscopes operate according to the theorem of relative accelerations, exploiting Coriolis acceleration. When an angular velocity is imparted on a movable mass that is moving with a linear velocity, the movable mass “feels” an apparent force, referred to as Coriolis force, which determines a displacement thereof in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the linear velocity and to the axis of rotation. The movable mass is supported via springs that enable a displacement thereof in the direction of the apparent force. According to Hooke's law, said displacement is proportional to the apparent force, and consequently, from the displacement of the movable mass, it is possible to detect the Coriolis force and the angular velocity that has generated it. The displacement of the movable mass can, for example, be detected capacitively, by measuring, in resonance conditions, the variations in capacitance caused by the movement of movable electrodes, integrally fixed to the movable mass and comb-fingered to fixed electrodes.
Examples of embodiment of integrated gyroscopes of a MEMS type are described in EP-A-1 253 399 and EP-A-1 365 211, filed in the name of the present applicant, which relate to gyroscopes with a rectilinear driving motion, or else in WO 02/103364 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,062,082, which relate to gyroscopes with rotary driving motion.
In general, gyroscopes of a known type are not completely satisfactory for what concerns simplicity of production, reduction in dimensions, efficiency, and immunity to disturbance. In addition, microelectromechanical structures of a known type enable a limited configurability. Furthermore, rejection of external interference (for example, due to spurious linear or angular accelerations) is critical.
One embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated microelectromechanical structure that enables the aforesaid advantages and problems to be overcome, and in particular is compact, simple to manufacture, and has a high detection efficiency and configurability.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an integrated microelectromechanical structure is consequently provided as defined in the present disclosure.
For a better understanding of the present invention, preferred embodiments thereof are now described purely by way of non-limiting examples and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
a-2b are schematic lateral sections of parts of the structure of
a-6d are schematic lateral sections of parts of the structure of
a, 16b show schemes of connection of capacitors of a portion of the structure of
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a microelectromechanical sensor structure comprises a single driving mass, anchored to a support in a single central point and driven with rotary motion about an axis, which passes through the central point and is orthogonal to the plane of the driving mass. In particular, the rotation of the driving mass enables two mutually orthogonal components of driving velocity in the plane of the mass. At least one through opening is provided inside the driving mass, in which a sensing mass is arranged; the sensing mass is enclosed within the driving mass, suspended with respect to the substrate, and connected to the driving mass via flexible elements. The sensing mass is fixed to the driving mass during its rotary motion, and has a further degree of freedom of movement as a function of an external stress, in particular a Coriolis force acting on the sensor. The flexible elements, according to their particular construction, allow the sensing mass to perform a rotary movement of detection about an axis lying in the plane of the sensor or else a linear movement of detection along an axis lying in the plane of the sensor in response, respectively, to a Coriolis acceleration acting in a direction perpendicular to the plane and to a Coriolis acceleration acting in a direction lying in said plane. Said movement is in any case substantially decoupled from that of the driving mass. As will be described in detail hereinafter, the microelectromechanical structure, in addition to being compact (in so far as it envisages just one driving mass that encloses in its overall dimensions one or more sensing masses), enables with minor structural modifications, a uniaxial, biaxial or triaxial gyroscope (and/or possibly an accelerometer, according to the electrical connections implemented) to be obtained, at the same time ensuring an excellent decoupling of the driving mass from the sensing mass during the movement of detection.
In detail, and with initial reference to
The driving mass 3 moreover has a first pair of first through openings 9a, 9b with a substantially rectangular shape elongated in a direction parallel to the second axis y, aligned in a diametral direction along the first axis of symmetry A, and set on opposite sides with respect to the empty space 6. In particular, as will be clarified hereinafter, the direction of alignment of the first through openings 9a, 9b corresponds to a direction of detection of the microelectromechanical sensor structure 1 (in the case represented in the figure, coinciding with the first axis x).
The driving assembly 4 comprises a plurality of driven arms 10 (for example, eight in number), extending externally from the driving mass 3 in a radial direction and spaced apart at a same angular distance, and a plurality of first and second driving arms 12a, 12b, extending parallel to, and on opposite sides of, respective driven arms 10. Each driven arm 10 carries a plurality of first electrodes 13, extending in a direction perpendicular to, and on either side of, the driven arm. Furthermore, each of the first and second driving arms 12a, 12b carries respective second electrodes 14a, 14b, extending towards the respective driven arm 10 and comb-fingered to the corresponding first electrodes 13. The first driving arms 12a are all arranged on the same side of the respective driven arms 10 and are all biased at a first voltage. Likewise, the second driving arms 12b are all arranged on the opposite side of the respective driven arms 10, and are all biased at a second voltage. In a per se known manner which is not illustrated, a driving circuit is connected to the second electrodes 14a, 14b so as to apply the first and second voltages and determine, by means of mutual and alternating attraction of the electrodes, an oscillatory rotary motion of the driving mass 3 about the drive axis, at a given oscillation frequency.
The microelectromechanical sensor structure 1 further comprises a first pair of acceleration sensors with axis parallel to the orthogonal axis z, and in particular a first pair of first sensing masses 16a, 16b, set, respectively, within the first through opening 9a and the second through opening 9b, so as to be completely enclosed and contained within the overall dimensions of the driving mass 3 in the plane of the sensor xy. The first sensing masses 16a, 16b have a generally rectangular shape, and are formed by a first rectangular portion 17, which is wider, and by a second rectangular portion 18, which is narrower (along the first axis x), connected by a connecting portion 19, which is shorter (in a direction parallel to the second axis y) than the first and second rectangular portions. Each first sensing mass 16a, 16b has a centroid G located within the corresponding first rectangular portion 17, and is supported by a pair of first elastic supporting elements 20 extending from, and connected to, the connecting portion 19 towards the driving mass 3 parallel to the second axis y. The first elastic supporting elements 20 extend at a distance from the centroid G of the respective sensing mass 16a, 16b, and form torsional springs that are rigid for the rotary motion of the driving mass 3, and also enable rotation of the first sensing masses about an axis of rotation parallel to the second axis y and lying in the plane of the sensor xy (and, consequently, their movement outside the plane of the sensor xy).
A first pair of first and second detection electrodes 22, 23 is arranged underneath the first and second rectangular portions 17, 18 of the sensing masses (see also
In a known way, both the driving mass 3 and the first sensing masses 16a, 16b are perforated, to enable chemical etching of an underlying sacrificial layer during the fabrication process and, hence, enable their release from the substrate 2.
In use, the microelectromechanical sensor structure 1 is able to operate as uniaxial gyroscope, designed to detect an angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}x (in
With reference also to
In particular, since the reading scheme is differential (see also the subsequent
Given the symmetry of the described structure, the possibility of providing a uniaxial gyroscope sensing rotations about the second axis y is evident. In particular (see
In an equally evident way (see
The solutions described, albeit efficient from many points of view, do not enable rejection of spurious angular accelerations about the axes of detection. For example, in the structure of
In order to solve said problem, a third embodiment of the invention (shown in
In detail, the first sensing masses 16a, 16b are in this case misaligned, and arranged on opposite sides with respect to the first axis of symmetry A so as to be symmetrical with respect to the centre O. The first sensing masses 16e, 16f are arranged in a similar way, and are set facing the first sensing masses 16a, 16b with respect to the first axis of symmetry A. Furthermore, the respective elastic supporting elements 20 are staggered along the first axis x, so that to the first rectangular portion 17, which is wider, of one sensing mass, there corresponds the second rectangular portion 18, which is narrower, of the sensing mass facing it. Likewise, the first sensing masses 16c, 16d are arranged on opposite sides with respect to the second axis of symmetry B, and are symmetrical with respect to the centre O. The first sensing masses 16g, 16h are set in positions facing the first sensing masses 16c, 16d on opposite sides of the second axis of symmetry B; the respective elastic supporting elements 20 are staggered along the second axis y.
In use, the described arrangement enables rejection of the spurious angular accelerations about the axes x and y. For example, in the presence of a spurious angular acceleration about the second axis y, the second and fourth pairs of first sensing masses 16c, 16d and 16g, 16h do not generate any appreciable capacitive unbalancing on account of the rigidity of the corresponding first elastic supporting elements 20 (in a way similar to what has been previously described). In addition, the first and third pairs of first sensing masses 16a, 16b and 16e, 16f, if connected electrically in an appropriate way (as will be described in detail hereinafter) give rise to a capacitive unbalancing that generates a common-mode signal, which can consequently be distinguished from the useful differential signal due to the Coriolis force.
In detail (
In the foregoing description, it is assumed to a first approximation that the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a acting on the first sensing masses has a direction parallel to the first axis x or to the second axis y, consequently considering the first sensing masses as punctiform and set on one of the axes of symmetry A, B of the structure. Outside this approximation, the rotary driving motion imparted on the first sensing masses by the driving mass 3 generates disturbance, in particular spurious angular velocities, intrinsically linked to the dynamics of motion. Also in this case, the use of eight first sensing masses appropriately connected to one another enables rejection of interferences.
In detail, reference is made to
In the event that only four sensing masses are used (or only two sensing masses, in the case of a uniaxial gyroscope), in the same dynamic conditions (
A fourth embodiment of the present invention envisages a microelectromechanical structure sensing angular velocities about the orthogonal axis z. Said structure is similar to the ones described previously (so that parts that are similar will be designated by the same reference numbers), but differs as regards the arrangement of the sensing masses (and the movement that these may be allowed by the elastic supporting elements) and as regards the adopted principle of detection. In particular, in this case, through openings made in the driving mass 3 acceleration sensors are provided with axis lying in the plane of the sensor xy (for example, with their axis parallel to the first or to the second axis x, y).
In detail (see
In use, the driving mass 3 is rotated about the orthogonal axis z with a driving angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}a (for example, clockwise), dragging along with it the second sensing masses 25a, 25b. An external angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}e to be detected, which also acts about the orthogonal axis z, generates a Coriolis force {right arrow over (F)}C on the second sensing masses 25a, 25b directed in the radial direction (hence directed as a centrifugal force acting on the same masses), causing displacement of the second sensing masses and a capacitive variation of the detection capacitors.
In greater detail, consider an inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′; the reference system OXYZ fixed to the substrate 2, with respect to which the driving mass 3 oscillates, rotates at the external angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}e with respect to the inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′. Consequently, with respect to the inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′, the microelectromechanical structure has a resultant angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}r equal to the vector sum {right arrow over (Ω)}r={right arrow over (Ω)}e+{right arrow over (Ω)}a between the external angular velocity and the driving angular velocity. In particular, in this case, the driving angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}a and the external angular velocity {right arrow over (Ω)}e have the same direction. In the inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′, the microelectromechanical structure is hence subjected to a centrifugal acceleration directed radially having a magnitude equal to acfg={right arrow over (Ω)}r2·r, where r is the distance from the axis of rotation (i.e., from the centre O). The direction of said acceleration is always radially away from the centre of rotation. If we develop the expression, the centrifugal acceleration acfg can be expressed with respect to the inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′ as
acfg={right arrow over (Ω)}r2·r=({right arrow over (Ω)}a+{right arrow over (Ω)}e)2·r=(Ωa2+2·Ωa·Ωe+Ωe2)·r
The three terms that constitute the expression of the centrifugal acceleration acfg are
Ωa2·r—relative acceleration of the mass in rotation with respect to the reference system OXYZ;
Ωe2·r—drag acceleration of the reference system OXYZ with respect to the inertial system O′X′Y′Z′;
2·Ωa·Ωe·r—Coriolis acceleration; in fact, said term can be re-written as 2·Ωe·(Ωa·r), where (Ωa·r)=va, i.e., as the result of the vector product 2·Ωe×{right arrow over (v)}a.
The same result may be reached by re-writing, for the system described, the general law of composition of accelerations. As is known, given two reference systems, namely, an absolute system O′X′Y′Z′ and a relative system OXYZ, the following expression applies:
a=a′+at+ac=a′−[ao′+{dot over (ω)}×r′+ω×(ω×r′)]−2ω×va
where a is the absolute acceleration; a′ is the relative acceleration; the term at=ao′+{dot over (ω)}×r′+ω×(ω×r′) is the drag acceleration; and the term ac=2ω×va is the Coriolis acceleration. In the case illustrated in
a={dot over (θ)}a2r′+{umlaut over (θ)}ar′+ao′+{dot over (Ω)}e×r′+Ωe2r′+2Ωe({dot over (θ)}ar′)
where θa is the angle of rotation of the entire structure with respect to the reference system OXYZ; the term {dot over (θ)}a2r′=Ωa2r′ is the term of relative centrifugal acceleration of the entire structure with respect to the reference system OXYZ; the term {umlaut over (θ)}ar′ is the term of relative tangential acceleration with respect to the reference system OXYZ; ao′=0, since the reference systems OXYZ and O′X′Y′Z′ do not move with translatory motion with respect to one another; the term {dot over (Ω)}a×r′ is the term of tangential drag acceleration of the system OXYZ that rotates with angular velocity Ωe with respect to the inertial reference system O′X′Y′Z′; Ωa2r′ is the term of centrifugal drag acceleration of the reference system OXYZ that rotates with angular velocity Ωe with respect to the inertial system O′X′Y′Z′; 2Ωe({dot over (θ)}ar′)=2Ωe(Ωar′)=2Ωe×va is the Coriolis acceleration.
The terms that represent the tangential accelerations do not have any effect on the dynamics of the sensing masses with respect to the driving mass, in so far as the sensing masses can move only in the radial direction. Consequently, the general expression is equivalent to:
acfg={right arrow over (Ω)}r2·r=({right arrow over (Ω)}a+{right arrow over (Ω)}e)2=·r=(Ωa2+2·Ωa·Ωe+Ωe2)·r
Using a purposely provided read circuit, (for example as described in the patent application EP 04425600.6, filed in the name of the present applicant on Aug. 3, 2004) it is possible to demodulate the capacitive signal, which is proportional to the magnitude of external angular velocity Ωe, with respect to the driving angular velocity Ωa. In this way, the only useful signal that enters the bandwidth of the demodulator is associated to the term 2·Ωa·Ωe, which, once demodulated, is found to be equal to 2·Ωe, and hence proportional to the external angular velocity Ωe alone, the value of which is to be determined. The other terms (with the fact that they are raised to the second power) can be easily filtered downstream of the demodulator (in so far as they have twice the original frequency), and for this reason they do not cause any significant disturbance at output. What has been described above has been verified by the applicant with a MATLAB “simulink” model. In conclusion, the microelectromechanical sensor structure 1 modulates the Coriolis acceleration, which, as a result of the way in which the driving dynamics is implemented, has the same direction as the centrifugal acceleration.
As regards the spurious accelerations along the second axis y (but similar considerations apply in the case of detection along the first axis x), they are automatically rejected in so far as reading is performed in a differential way. In fact, whereas the Coriolis useful signal tends to unbalance the second sensing masses 25a, 25b in opposite radial directions (in so far as in the term 2·Ωa·Ωe·r the vector {right arrow over (r)} has opposite directions), the spurious angular accelerations determine contributions having the same sign. By subtracting the two acceleration signals generated by the two acceleration sensors from one another, it is possible to measure the Coriolis contribution and to reject the spurious acceleration along the second axis y.
As regards the spurious angular accelerations along the axis z, these entail a tangential acceleration that does not cause any disturbance to detection along the second axis y.
If, instead, an angular acceleration about the first axis x or the second axis y is applied to the system, the driving mass 3 twists slightly because the elastic anchorage elements 8 at the centre of the structure rigidly oppose bending of the driving mass out of the plane xy. For small rotations along the axis x or y, this entails only ranges of displacement along the axis z for the accelerometer and spurious signals, which again can be intrinsically rejected through the differential reading by the sensor in the plane xy.
As regards the spurious signals deriving from the rotary driving motion about the orthogonal axis z, reference may be made to
acfg={right arrow over (Ω)}r2·r=(Ωa+Ωe)2·r=(Ωa2+2·Ωa·Ωe+Ωa2)·r
which generates the Coriolis term, whilst the second component {right arrow over (v)}ay gives rise, from the cross product with the vector sum {right arrow over (Ω)}r={right arrow over (Ω)}a+{right arrow over (Ω)}a, to a force directed along the first axis x. Given that the second elastic supporting elements 28 are rigid in said direction, the sensor is able to reject said undesirable components of velocity.
In the case of an external angular velocity that lies in the plane of the sensor xy, the components of the driving velocity {right arrow over (v)}a are only due to the driving motion. Their vector product with an external angular velocity that lies on the plane of the sensor xy gives rise to a Coriolis term directed out of the plane of the sensor xy. Also in this case, the second elastic supporting elements 28, at least to a first approximation, do not enable any significant out-of-plane displacements. Consequently, the sensor is able to reject also angular velocities that are not directed along the z axis.
A fifth embodiment of the present invention envisages a triaxial sensor structure (in particular a gyroscope), which is obtained by combining the structures described previously.
In detail (see
As shown in
Furthermore, according to what is described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/177,474 filed in the name of the present applicant on Jul. 7, 2005, it is possible to provide an insulation region for electrical decoupling of the driving mass from the sensing masses. Said decoupling enables application of different biasing voltages to the driving and detection structures and thus prevents phenomena of cross-talk and interference in the reading stage.
As illustrated schematically in
The portions of the driving mass 3 that lie within the insulation regions 34a, 34b, referred to as detection portions 3a and 3b, form part of a detection structure and are biased at a detection voltage, whilst the portion that lies outside said insulation regions 34a, 34b, referred to as driving portion 3c, forms part of a driving structure (also forming part of which are, amongst other elements, the driven arms 10) and is biased at a driving voltage. In particular, the detection voltage and the driving voltage are applied, respectively, via a first electrode 35a and a second electrode 35b, which are insulated from one another, are set in a position corresponding to the anchorage 7, and are each fixed to two elastic anchorage elements 8, which connect them to the detection and driving portions, respectively, of the driving mass 3. Notwithstanding the open shape of the rings of the insulation regions 34a, 34b, the “open” portion (i.e., the portion that would lead to closing of the rings) has reduced dimensions if compared with the ones of the entire insulation ring, so that its contribution to leakage is negligible.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, the microelectromechanical sensor structure 1 may be used alternatively as gyroscope (whether uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial) and as accelerometer (whether uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial), by simply modifying the electrical connections 24 between the detection capacitors, and particularly between the first and second electrodes 22, 23. In particular, in this case, the aforesaid electrical connections 24 are not established in the design stage, but can be modified by the purposely provided read circuit, for example by using controlled switches.
By way of example,
In detail, the read circuit controls the gyroscope operating mode of the sensor structure, simply by setting the third and fourth switch elements 38, 39 in a closed condition and by setting the first and second switch elements 36, 37 in an open condition; and controls the accelerometer operating mode simply by setting the first and second switch elements 36, 37 in a closed condition and setting the third and fourth switch elements 38, 39 in an open condition. What has been described can also be applied indifferently to the other pairs of sensing masses, and to any described detection structure, whether uniaxial, biaxial, or triaxial.
The advantages of the microelectromechanical sensor structure according to the invention are clear from the foregoing description.
In any case, it is underlined again that it is possible to provide uniaxial, biaxial and in particular triaxial gyroscopes of compact dimensions, given the presence of a single driving mass that encloses in its overall dimensions the sensing masses designed for detection. The rotary motion of the driving mass enables two components of driving velocity, orthogonal to one another in the plane of the sensor, to be automatically obtained, and hence effective implementation of a biaxial detection. Furthermore, the presence of the sensing masses free to move in a radial direction, responsive to the Coriolis force having the same direction as the centrifugal acceleration, enables implementation of a triaxial detection.
The presence of a single central anchorage for the driving mass enables reduction of the thermomechanical stresses (in a per-se known way—see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,124 filed in the name of the present applicant, which relates to a microelectromechanical accelerometer), in addition to allowing the aforesaid rotary motion.
The drive and detection dynamics are clearly decoupled from one another, thanks to the particular geometry and arrangement of the elastic supporting and anchoring elements.
The described structure enables a good rejection of spurious linear and angular accelerations and angular cross-velocities for any direction of detection to be obtained.
In addition, it is possible to switch the mode of operation of the microelectromechanical structure between an accelerometer mode and a gyroscope mode by simply modifying the connections between the detection capacitors (an operation that can be carried out by a purposely provided read circuit). In this connection,
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations can be made to what is described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined in the annexed claims.
In particular, the driving mass 3 can have a shape different from the circular one, for example any closed polygonal shape. Furthermore, even though this may not be advantageous, said shape may not have a perfect radial symmetry (or in general any other type of symmetry).
In a per-se known manner, the displacement of the sensing masses can be detected with a different technique other than the capacitive one, for example, by detecting a magnetic force.
It is also evident that yet other structures different from the ones shown can be obtained, by appropriately combining pairs of first and second sensing masses; for example, a biaxial gyroscope with axes of detection x-z, or y-z can be obtained.
Furthermore, the torsional moment for causing the driving mass to oscillate with rotary motion can be generated in a different manner, for example by means of parallel-plate electrodes, or else magnetic actuation.
Finally, the microelectromechanical structure, in its simplest embodiment, can comprise a single (first or second) sensing mass, with the disadvantage of not being able to reject linear accelerations in the direction of detection.
All of the above U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06425163 | Mar 2006 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5889207 | Lutz | Mar 1999 | A |
6062082 | Guenther et al. | May 2000 | A |
6189381 | Huang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6244111 | Funk | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250157 | Touge | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6308567 | Higuchi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6349597 | Folkmer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374672 | Abbink et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6508124 | Zerbini et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513380 | Reeds et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6626039 | Adams et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6715352 | Tracy | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6837107 | Geen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6894576 | Giousouf et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918298 | Park | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7100446 | Acar et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7258012 | Xie | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020189352 | Reeds, III et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20060070441 | Durante et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090064780 | Coronato et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19641284 | May 1998 | DE |
102004017480 | Oct 2005 | DE |
0971208 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1253399 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1365211 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1617178 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1624286 | Feb 2006 | EP |
0029855 | May 2000 | WO |
02103364 | Dec 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070214883 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |