The present invention relates to microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and in particular to MEMS for transferring electrical power while maintaining electrical isolation between the points of transfer.
MEMS are extremely small machines fabricated using integrated circuit techniques or the like. The small size of MEMS makes possible the mass production of high speed, low power, and high reliability mechanisms that could not be realized on a larger scale.
Often in electrical circuits, it is desired to transfer power between two points while maintaining electrical isolation between those points. Isolation, in this context, means that there is no direct current (DC) path between the points of transfer. Isolation may also imply a degree of power limiting that prevents faults on one side of the isolation from affecting circuitry on the other side of the isolation.
Conventional techniques of power transfer with electrical isolation include the use of transformers or capacitors such as may provide alternating current (AC) power transfer while eliminating a direct DC path.
There are drawbacks to these conventional techniques. First, when DC power must be transferred, additional circuitry (chopping) must be used to convert the DC input power to AC to be transferred by the transformer or capacitor. After transfer, further circuitry (rectification) must be used to convert the AC power back to DC power. This additional circuitry adds considerable expense. Second, the volume occupied by the capacitor or transformer may preclude its use in certain applications where many independently isolated circuits must be placed in close proximity or isolation is required-on a very small mechanical scale, for example, on an integrated circuit.
The present invention employs MEMS structures to implement a “flying capacitor” circuit in which a capacitor is alternately connected to input and output terminals. The capacitor as switched provides a vehicle for the transfer of DC power while at no time creating a direct connection between input and output terminals. In the invention, the switches are MEMS switches which may be extremely small and operate at extremely high switching rates.
The charge on the flying capacitor may be used to activate the MEMS switch producing an extremely simple circuit. Alternatively, the MEMS switch may be operated by an external oscillator which may be controlled to provide a degree of power regulation in addition to isolation.
The invention is well adapted for use as an input circuit, for example, as input to a programmable logic controller and may, in that capacity, provide not only isolation but also a controllable input impedance allowing the input circuit to be used with different input voltage levels.
Specifically, the present invention provides in one embodiment an electrical isolator in which a MEMS switch array has an actuator receiving an actuator signal to alternately connect a capacitor between two input terminals and two output terminals. The MEMS switch array operates so that in a first switch state, the capacitor is connected to the input terminals and not to the output terminals and, in a second switch state, the capacitor is connected to the output terminals and not the input terminals. An actuator signal generator provides the actuator signal to repeatedly switch the MEMS switch array between a first and second state.
Thus, it is one object of the invention to provide an extremely small-scale power isolator.
It is another object of the invention to provide a power isolator that benefits from the high reliability and high switching speed of MEMS based switches.
The actuator signal generator can be a connection to the capacitor so that a predetermined voltage on the capacitor causes a switching of the MEMS switch array away from the first state to the second state.
Thus, it is another object of the invention to provide an extremely simple power isolator in which the charging of the capacitor serves to cause the switching action.
Alternatively, the actuator signal may be an electronic oscillator. The oscillator may communicate with the output terminals to provide an oscillator output that is a function of the electrical signal at the output terminal. For example, the oscillator may respond to a lower voltage on the output terminal to increase its frequency or duty cycle thus causing more charge to be transferred through the switching array.
Thus, it is another object of the invention to use the present power isolator to provide power regulation at the output terminal. By controlling the switching speed, current and/or voltage at the output terminal may be controlled.
The output terminals of the MEMS switch array may be attached to a shunt for discharging the capacitor in between transfers of charge from input to output terminals. This allows precise quantities of charge to be transferred, useful for passing an amount of charge corresponding to the voltage on the input conveying a better measure of the input voltage. The shunt also allows the effective impedance or resistance at the input to be controlled by accurately controlling the current flow into the input terminals for a given voltage. A controller may provide an actuator signal to the MEMS switch array to present a predetermined effective impedance at the input terminal that is essentially a reflection of the shunt impedance modulated by the switching of the switch array.
The predetermined resistance may be selected from a set of different predetermined resistances used with different input voltages. Alternatively, or in addition, a voltage sensor may be connected to the output terminals to communicate with the controller to change the predetermined effective resistance as a function of sensed voltage.
Thus, it is another object of the invention to provide an isolator that may control the effective input impedance at the input terminals while preserving isolation between input and output terminals. Such an isolator may be useful for input circuits that must present a certain load, for example, those used in a programmable logic controller.
These particular objects and advantages may apply to only some embodiments falling within the claims and thus do not define the scope of the invention.
Referring now to
The longitudinal beam 12 may support an input actuator 26 and a bias actuator 28. As shown, the input actuator 26 is positioned at the end of the longitudinal beam 12 near transverse arms 14 and consists of two pairs of interdigitated capacitor plates 30. One half of each pair of interdigitated capacitor plates 30 are supported by the longitudinal beam 12 extending in opposite directions from the longitudinal beam 12. The remaining half of each pair of interdigitated capacitor plates 30 are supported by terminals 32 attached to the underlying substrate 22.
As will be understood in the art, voltage potential placed on these interdigitated capacitor plates 30 will cause a force so as to induce a rightward movement of the longitudinal beam 12 as indicated by arrow 34.
The bias actuator 28 is constructed of interdigitated capacitor plates 36 similar to capacitor plates 30 described above but positioned on longitudinal beam 12 near the transverse arms 16. Again, half of each pair of interdigitated capacitor plates 36 extend transversely from opposite sides of the longitudinal beam 12 and the other half of each pair of interdigitated capacitor plates 36 are supported by terminals 38 affixed to the substrate 22.
The structure described thus far may be generally constructed of silicon, a semiconductor, and fabricated using MEMS fabrication techniques. However, the longitudinal beam 12 also includes, from left to right, three sections of insulating material 40, 42 and 44 separated along its length. The insulating material may be, for example, silicon dioxide. The remaining structure may be metallized so that the three sections of insulating material 40, 42 and 44 separate the longitudinal beam 12, from left to right, into four conductive regions 46, 48, 50 and 52. In an alternative embodiment, insulating section 42 may be omitted provided the switch operates in a break before make mode. Additional variations are described below.
Conductive region 46 provides an electrical path from pylons 18 through transverse arms 14 to half of the capacitor plates 30 thus, providing a way to bias the input actuator 26 through pylons 18 and 32. Conversely, conductive region 52 provides electrical connection through pylon 20, transverse arms 16 to half of capacitor plates 36 providing electrical connection to the bias actuator 28 through terminal 38 and pylon 20.
Extending transversely on opposite sides of conductive region 48 are contact bars 54 (also metallized) and extending transversely on opposite sides from conductive region 50 are contact bars 56. In a first position, indicated in
The resistance between stationary contact 58 and contact bar 54, when touching, may be decreased by a side surfaced metallization communicating with the upper surface metallization. This side surface metallization may be produced by etching a cavity next to the contact bars 54 and stationary contact 58 before their release from the substrate material. The side surface metallization may also be produced by plating a metal such as Al, Ni, Cu, Au, Ag onto the stationary contacts. The cavity may be filled with a metal compound such as aluminum or copper according to techniques well known in the art.
Referring now to
Referring again to
The MEMS switch 10 so created is symmetrical providing for improved fabrication tolerances.
Referring now to
Similarly, a second MEMS switch 10b provides a connection between the other end of a capacitor 72 with either of an input terminal 74b or an output terminal 76b under the influence of the input actuator 26b operating against bias actuator 28b. During operation, the capacitor 72 is connected first with both input terminals 74a and 74b to charge the capacitor 72 from an input voltage source, and then it is disconnected from input terminals 74a and 74b and connected to output terminals 76a and 76b for discharge. The operation of the MEMS switches is such as to eliminate any instantaneous current path between terminals 74 and 76. In this way, power is transferred from input terminal 74 to output terminals 76 while maintaining complete isolation between terminals 74 and terminals 76. As will be seen, the switching action also provides limitations on current flow and voltage transfer that can reduce noise transmission and the effects of overvoltage on the input.
The circuit of
Referring now to
Motion of the longitudinal beams 12a and 12b of MEMS switch 10a and MEMS switch 10b, respectively, in unison left and right, implement the circuit of
As mentioned, the high rate of switching possible by MEMS switch 10a and MEMS switch 10b allow significant power flow from the input terminals 74 to the output terminals 76 with a relatively small capacitor 72 such as may be fabricated on the substrate of the MEMS switches 10a and 10b. Alternatively, capacitor 72 may be located externally allowing greater transfer of power limited only by the current capabilities of the MEMS switches 10a and 10b.
Generally, the activation of the MEMS switches 10a and 10b may be under the influence of an oscillator attached either to one or both of the input actuator 26 and the bias actuator 28 of MEMS switches 10a and 10b. In one embodiment, however, the capacitor 72 may provide the voltage to the bias actuator 28 of MEMS switches 10a and 10b via connection 59 as shown. In this embodiment, a constant bias voltage from bias voltage 82 may be attached to the bias actuator 28 of MEMS switches 10a and 10b.
Referring now to
Key to this self-actuation is that the resisting force 88 be made to abruptly decrease to the value (B). This may be accomplished by use of an over-center spring provided by bowed transverse arms 14 and/or 16 described below with respect to
Thus, the action of charging and discharging of the capacitor 72 forms the oscillator for driving the longitudinal beams 12a and 12b from the leftmost position to the rightmost position and back again. The speed of the switching will be determined in part by the amount of power flow as reflected in the charge and discharge rate of the capacitor 72. Thus, the power transfer will be on demand.
It is also possible using this technique to add a simple counter to record the number of times the capacitor has achieved a predetermined threshold voltage producing threshold force (A). The total recorded number of switching cycles can provide an approximate, digital value of the input voltage without the use of an analog-to-digital converter. Other inherent benefits of using a counter such as efficiency, power consumption, and speed are also available with this technique.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
In this embodiment, the voltage at the output terminal 76a may be optionally monitored by a differential amplifier 102 and compared to a desired reference voltage 104. The output of the differential amplifier 102 may then be provided to the oscillator 100 which may be a voltage controlled oscillator so as to increase the switching speed as the voltage on the output terminal 76a drops below the desired reference voltage 104. A higher switching speed may increase the power throughput and in this way, output voltage and/or current regulation may be achieved.
For example, referring to
Referring now to
The input circuits 114 may provide a connection to an external sensor 116 that produces a voltage indicating a high or low state or an analog value indicating a number within a range by resolving the charge on capacitor 72 to the desired number of bits. The sensor 116 may require a particular input resistance at the I/O circuit 114 such as allows a predetermined current flow 118.
Generally, such input circuits 114 may be designed for use with a specific input voltage. For example, different input circuits 114 may be required for the DC voltages of 5 volts, 12 volts, 24 volts, 48 volts, and 125. Similarly, different input circuits 114 are used for the AC voltages of 120 volts, and 230 volts. Each of these input circuits has a different switching threshold and different input impedance which requires the manufacturer to construct and stock a number of different input circuits or modifications.
Generally, output circuits 117 are designed for use with a specific output voltage (AC output or DC output). The output circuits 117 may provide a connection to an external actuator or indicator 119 that receives a voltage for example, a high or low state or an analog voltage, within a predefined range.
The device shown in
Referring now to
Output terminals 76a and 76b are connected to a shunting resistor 122 having a value lower than the input impedance required for the lowest voltage range in which the input circuit 121 is intended to operate. An analog to digital converter 124 allows charge flowing across the shunting resistor 122 and the output terminal 76a and 76b to be measured, for example, by integrating the decaying voltage across the shunting resistor 122 or other charge measurement techniques well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Referring also to
A measurement of the voltage presented at input terminals 74a and 74b of the input circuit 121 may be determined by the analog to digital converter 124 at the instant of switching of the capacitor 72 to the output terminals 76a and 76b and will be the peak of the voltage wave form 130 at the output terminals 76a and 76b. The resultant digital value may be compared against a predetermined switching threshold (also programmed into the processor 120) to provide for discrimination between logically high and logically low states.
In an alternative embodiment, the processor 120 may detect the peak voltage readings of waveform 130 from the analog to digital converter 124 and use this peak reading to select an impedance, and thus no preprogramming of the input circuit 121 need be performed.
Referring now to
Limiting resistor 80 also connects with an input actuator 26 of a second MEMS switch 10b also having a bias actuator 28 and sensing structure 140 attached to longitudinal beam 12b and each isolated from the others by insulating materials 40 and 42. Such devices and their fabrication are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,385 entitled: “Process for Manufacture of Micro Electromechanical Devices Having High Electrical Isolation” and U.S. applications Ser. No. 10/002,725 entitled: “Method for Fabricating an Isolated Microelectromechanical System Device”; and Ser. No. 09/963,936 entitled: “Method for Constructing an Isolated Microelectromechanical System Device using Surface Fabrication Techniques” hereby incorporated by reference.
At times when the switch of MEMS switch 10a is open, the voltage at input terminal 74a is seen at the capacitor plates of input actuator 26b and causes a force tending to move the longitudinal beam 12b of device 10b leftward against the biasing force of the bias actuator 28b provided by a bias voltage 82. The bias voltage sets the switching threshold of the MEMS switch 10a and thus the threshold of the input circuit 121.
When the force caused by the input actuator 26b exceeds the force of the bias actuator 28b, the longitudinal beam 12b moves left. This motion may be sensed by the sensing structure 140 and decoded by a capacitance to digital decoders circuit 141 to produce an output activation signal 142.
In this structure, two MEMS switches 10a and 10b allow independent setting of an input impedance and threshold voltage through the setting of oscillator 132 and bias voltage 82. Both of these may be controlled by inputs from a processor (not shown) to allow automatic reconfiguration of the input circuit 121 for different expected voltages.
Referring briefly to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
It is specifically intended that the present invention not be limited to the embodiments and illustrations contained herein, but include modified forms of those embodiments including portions of the embodiments and combinations of elements of different embodiments as come within the scope of the following claims. For example, the devices described may be operated in series or in parallel with other similar devices to increase their voltage or current handling capacity. This approach can in the case of parallel operation also provides redundancy in the event of a single device failure and the potential opportunity for dynamic reconfiguration.
While the preferred embodiment described above is a planar device that operates laterally, the present invention can also operate in the vertical plane, for example, using cantilevered switch elements with capacitor devices connected at the end of the cantilevered beam. Other geometries are also possible, for example, those operating in rotation using a micromotor or an electrostatic driven MEMs motor. Such a device could employ multiple spokes (such as 4 or 8) and capacitor devices at the end of the moving spokes could also provide the charging/discharging cycle described in this application. For example, as the micromotor turned one capacitor spoke could be charging up while another one was discharging. The micromotor could rotate continuously or index to different spoke positions.
The MEMs isolation devices described herein could be fabricated on a common “floating” MEMs base to make them less sensitive to machinery vibration.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3886447 | Tanaka | May 1975 | A |
4560953 | Bozio | Dec 1985 | A |
5012207 | Edwards | Apr 1991 | A |
5025346 | Tang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
5243861 | Kloeck et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5343157 | Deschamps | Aug 1994 | A |
5359893 | Dunn | Nov 1994 | A |
5399232 | Albrecht et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413668 | Aslam et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417312 | Tsuchitani et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424650 | Frick | Jun 1995 | A |
5491604 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5536988 | Zhang et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5563343 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572057 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578528 | Wuu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5585311 | Ko | Dec 1996 | A |
5600190 | Zettler | Feb 1997 | A |
5646432 | Iwaki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658698 | Yagi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5723353 | Muenzel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5798283 | Montague et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5815051 | Hamasaki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834864 | Hesterman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847280 | Sherman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5877038 | Coldren et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880921 | Tham et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5920978 | Koshikawa et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943155 | Goossen | Aug 1999 | A |
5946549 | Itoigawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955932 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959516 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5995688 | Aksyuk et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008138 | Laermer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6060336 | Wan | May 2000 | A |
6072686 | Yarbrough | Jun 2000 | A |
6094102 | Chang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6116756 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127767 | Lee et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144545 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149190 | Galvin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159385 | Yao et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170332 | MacDonald et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188322 | Yao et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6232150 | Lin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236281 | Nguyen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257705 | Silverbrook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265238 | Yaji et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276205 | McNie et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307169 | Sun et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316278 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356378 | Huibers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356689 | Greywall | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369931 | Funk et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373682 | Goodwin-Johansson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384353 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391742 | Kawai | May 2002 | B2 |
6400009 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411214 | Yao et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417743 | Mihailovich et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428713 | Christenson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463339 | Vasko | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465929 | Levitan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466005 | Yao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497141 | Turner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504356 | Yao et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6547973 | Field | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6593672 | Ma et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6624720 | Allison et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633212 | Ruan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20020017132 | McNie et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021119 | Yao et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020158039 | Harris et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030132823 | Hyman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040095205 | Schaffner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 665 590 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 711 029 | May 1996 | EP |
0 763 844 | Mar 1997 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040189142 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |