This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international application number PCT/GB2017/051991, filed Jul. 6, 2017, which claims the benefit of GB application number 1611770.7, filed Jul. 6, 2016, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a microfluidic device, in particular a device comprising a sensor for sensing in wet conditions.
A variety of microfluidic devices and sensors are known. Sensors such as disclosed by WO99/13101 and WO88/08534 are provided in the dry state and a liquid test sample applied to the device is transported to the sensor region within the device by capillary flow. Other types of sensors are known, such as ion selective sensors comprising an ion selective membrane.
Another example is provided by WO 2009/077734 which discloses an apparatus for creating layers of amphiphilic molecules, and is now briefly discussed with reference to
In use aqueous solution 10 is introduced into the chamber 7 and a layer 11 of amphiphilic molecules is formed across the recess 5 separating aqueous solution 10 in the recess 5 from the remaining volume of aqueous solution in the chamber 7. Use of a chamber 7 which is closed makes it very easy to flow aqueous solution 10 into and out of the chamber 7. This is done simply by flowing the aqueous solution 10 through the inlet 8 as shown in
The apparatus includes an electrode arrangement to allow measurement of electrical signals across the layer 11 of amphiphilic molecules, which allows the device to function as a sensor. The substrate 3 has a first conductive layer 20 deposited on the upper surface of the substrate 3 and extending under the further layer 4 to the recess 5. The portion of the first conductive layer 20 underneath the recess 5 constitutes an electrode 21 which also forms the lowermost surface of the recess 5. The first conductive layer 20 extends outside the further layer 4 so that a portion of the first conductive layer 20 is exposed and constitutes a contact 22.
The further layer 4 has a second conductive layer 23 deposited thereon and extending under the cover 6 into the chamber 7, the portion of the second conductive layer 23 inside the chamber 7 constituting an electrode 24. The second conductive layer 23 extends outside the cover 6 so that a portion of the second conductive layer 23 is exposed and constitutes a contact 25. The electrodes 21 and 24 make electrical contact with aqueous solution in the recess 5 and chamber 7. This allows measurement of electrical signals across the layer 11 of amphiphilic molecules by connection of an electrical circuit to the contacts 22 and 25.
In practice, the device of
An analysis apparatus incorporating means to provide amphiphilic membranes and nanopores to the sensor is disclosed by WO2012/042226. The step of providing the amphiphilic membranes and nanopores is carried out prior to use of the device, typically by the end user. However this provides drawbacks in that additional steps are required on the part of the consumer and also requires the provision of an apparatus with a complex fluidic arrangement including valves and supply reservoirs. Furthermore setting up such a sensor for use by the user can be prone to error. There is a risk that, even if the system is set up correctly, it will dry out, which could potentially damage the sensor. There is also a risk that excessive flowrates in the sample chamber could cause damage to the sensor. This risk increases for more compact devices, which bring the sample input port into closer proximity to the sensor (and so there is less opportunity for system losses to reduce the flowrates through the device).
It is therefore desirable to provide a device to the user in a ‘ready to use’ state wherein the amphiphilic membranes and nanopores are pre-inserted and are maintained under wet conditions. More generally it is also desirable to provide a device wherein the sensor is provided in a wet condition, for example provided in a wet condition to or by the user prior to detection of an analyte.
A typical nanopore device provided in a ‘ready to use’ state comprises an array of amphiphilic membranes, each membrane comprising a nanopore and being provided across a well containing a liquid. Such a device and method of making is disclosed by WO2014/064443. Test liquid to be analysed is applied to the upper surface of the amphiphilic membranes. Providing a device in a ‘ready to use’ state however has additional considerations in that care needs to be taken that the sensor does not dry out, namely that liquid is not lost from the well by passage through the amphiphilic membrane, which may result in a loss of performance or damage the sensor. One solution to address the problem of drying out of the sensor is to provide the device with a buffer liquid over the surface of the amphiphilic membrane such that any evaporation through the surface of the membrane is minimised and the liquids provided on either side of the membrane may have the same ionic strength so as to reduce any osmotic effects. In use the buffer liquid may be removed from the surface of the amphiphilic membrane and a test liquid to be analysed is introduced to contact the surface. When the device contains a buffer liquid, the questions of how to remove it and how to introduce the test liquid become an issue. Due to the presence of the buffer liquid, namely that the sensor is provided in a ‘wet state’, the capillary force provided by a dry capillary channel cannot be utilised to draw test liquid into the sensor. A pump may be used to displace the buffer liquid and to introduce a test liquid, however this results in a device with added complexity and cost.
An ion selective electrode device comprising one or more ion selective membranes is typically calibrated prior to use with a solution having a known ionic concentration. The ion selective membranes may be provided in a capillary flow path connecting a fluid entry port through which a calibrant solution may be introduced and caused to flow over the ion selective electrodes by capillary action. Thereafter the calibrant solution may be displaced and the analyte solution caused to flow over the electrodes in order to perform the measurement. In large benchtop devices for the measurement of ions, a peristaltic pump may for example be employed to displace the liquid. However for simple disposable devices, a less complex solution is more desirable.
In other devices, a pair of electrodes may be provided in a capillary channel into which a first test liquid is drawn by capillary action in order to make an electrochemical analysis. Following measurement of the first test liquid, it may be desirable to measure a second test liquid. However an additional force intervention is needed in order to remove the first test liquid prior to introduction of the second test liquid as capillary force is longer available.
The present invention aims to at least partly reduce or overcome the problems discussed above.
|[D1] According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a microfluidic device for analysing a test liquid comprising at least one of the following features: a sensor provided in a sensing chamber; a flow path comprising a sensing chamber inlet and a sensing chamber outlet connecting to the sensing chamber for respectively passing liquid into and out of the sensing chamber, and a sample input port in fluid communication with the inlet; a liquid collection channel downstream of the outlet; a flow path interruption between the sensing chamber outlet and the liquid collection channel, preventing liquid from flowing into the liquid collection channel from upstream, whereby the device may be activated by completing the flow path between the sample input port and the liquid collection channel; a conditioning liquid filling from the sample input port to the flow path interruption such that the sensor is covered by liquid and unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface; wherein the device is configured such that following activation of the device, the sensor remains unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface and the application of respectively one or more volumes of test liquid to a wet surface of the input port provides a net driving force sufficient to introduce the one or more volumes of test liquid into the device and displace buffer liquid into the liquid collection channel.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a fluidic device (e.g., a microfluidic device) comprising one or more of the following elements: a sensor provided in a sensing chamber; a liquid inlet and liquid outlet connecting to the sensor chamber for respectively passing liquid into and out of the sensing chamber and; a sample input port in fluid communication with the liquid inlet; a liquid collection channel downstream of the sensing chamber outlet; a flow path interruption between the liquid outlet and the liquid collection channel, preventing liquid from flowing into the liquid collection channel from upstream; a buffer liquid filling from the sample input port to the sensing chamber, and filling the sensing chamber and filling from the liquid outlet to the flow path interruption; an activation system operable to complete the flow path between the liquid outlet and the liquid collection channel such that the sensor remains unexposed to gas or a gas/liquid interface. That is, the liquid over the sensor is neither totally nor partially displaced by gas (there may be dissolved gas or microbubbles that may be present in the liquid, but the presence of these is not intended to be excluded by the phrase ‘unexposed to gas or gas/liquid interface’).
In some embodiments, a device provided herein is configured to avoid free draining of the sensing chamber when a flow path is completed.
In some embodiments, the device is an electrochemical device for the detection of an analyte and the sensor comprises electrodes.
In some embodiments the electrodes may be ion selective.
In some embodiments, a sample input port, a sensing chamber inlet and a liquid collection channel are configured to avoid free draining of a sensing chamber when a flow path is completed and further wherein a input port is configured such that it presents a wet surface to a test liquid to be applied to the device.
In some embodiments, a device provided herein is configured such that following completion of a flow path and prior to addition of a volume of test sample to a sample input port, a pressure at the input port is equal to a pressure at the liquid collection channel, such that the liquid is at equilibrium.
In some embodiments, a sample input port is configured such that addition of a volume of test liquid to said port provides a net driving force sufficient to introduce the one or more volumes of test liquid into the device and displace buffer liquid into the collection channel.
In some embodiments, a sample input port, a sensing chamber inlet and a liquid collection channel are configured such that, when an activation system has been operated to complete the flow path, a sensor remains unexposed to gas or a gas/liquid interface whilst the device is tilted.
In some embodiments, a sensing chamber inlet and a liquid collection channel are configured to balance capillary pressures and flow resistances to avoid free draining of a sensing chamber when a flow path is completed.
In some embodiments, a device provided herein further comprises a weir past which fluid may be displaced by provision of a liquid to a sample input port, but which prevents draining of a sample chamber.
In some embodiments, a device provided herein further comprises a priming reservoir filled with fluid. A fluid may be introduced into a flow path, for example for making fine adjustments to a volume of liquid in the flow path. An activation system may be operable to introduce fluid from the priming reservoir to complete the flow path between a liquid outlet and a liquid collection channel.
In some embodiments, a device provided herein further comprises a removable seal for a sample input port.
In some embodiments, a sample input port and a seal are configured such that the removal of the seal provides a priming action to maintain a buffer liquid in the input port and present a wet surface to a test liquid to be applied.
In some embodiments, a priming action draws fluid from the liquid collection channel or a priming reservoir.
In some embodiments, a flow path interruption comprises a closed valve; and an activation system comprises a mechanism for opening the valve. The valve may be a hydrophobic valve.
In some embodiments, a flow path interruption comprises a flow obstacle; and n activation system comprises a mechanism for removing the flow obstacle or forcing liquid past the flow obstacle.
In some embodiments, a sensor can contain a single well. Alternatively, a sensor can comprise an array of wells, wherein each well comprises a liquid and wherein a membrane is provided across the surface of each well separating the liquid contained in the well from the buffer liquid.
In some embodiments, each membrane further comprises a nanopore.
In some embodiments, a membrane is ion selective.
In some embodiments, a membrane is amphiphilic.
In some embodiments, a nanopore is a biological nanopore.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of filling the microfluidic device according to any one of the preceding embodiments, with test liquid, the method comprising one or more of the following steps: operating the activation system to complete the flow path; introducing test liquid into the device via the sample input port so as to displace buffer liquid from the sensing chamber into the liquid collection channel whilst; ceasing to introduce test liquid such that the sensor remains unexposed to gas or a gas/liquid interface.
In some embodiments, a device further comprises a removable seal for a sample input port and the method further comprises: removing the removable seal and priming the sample input port so that the input port is filled with buffer liquid before the step of introducing the test liquid.
In some embodiments, a step of priming comprises flushing a device by providing additional buffer liquid to the device through a sample input port.
In some embodiments, a step of priming comprises drawing fluid from inside a device into a sample input port.
In some embodiments, a plurality of discrete volumes of test liquid are successively applied to a sample input port in order to successively displace buffer liquid into the liquid collection channel.
According to one embodiment there is provided a microfluidic device for analysing a test liquid comprising one or more of the following features: a sensor provided in a sensing chamber; a flow path comprising a liquid inlet and a liquid outlet connecting to the sensing chamber for respectively passing liquid into and out of the sensing chamber, and a sample input port in fluid communication with the inlet; a liquid collection channel downstream of the outlet; a flow path interruption structure positioned between the sensing chamber outlet and the liquid collection channel, wherein the flow path interruption structure is configured to be operable in a first state to prevent upstream liquid from flowing into the liquid collection channel, or in a second state to complete the flow path between the sample input port and the liquid collection channel; a conditioning liquid contained in a flow path connecting from the sample input port to the flow path interruption such that the sensor is covered by liquid and unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface; wherein the dimensions of the sample input port and liquid collection channel are configured such that following activation of the device (i.e. changing from the first state to the second state), the sensor remains unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface and the application of respectively one or more volumes of test liquid to a wet surface of the input port provides a net driving force sufficient to introduce the one or more volumes of test liquid into the device and displace buffer liquid into the liquid collection channel.
According to one embodiment there is provided a microfluidic device for analysing a test liquid comprising one or more of the following features: a sensor provided in a sensing chamber; a flow path comprising a liquid inlet and a liquid outlet connecting to the sensing chamber for respectively passing liquid into and out of the sensing chamber, and a sample input port in fluid communication with the inlet; a liquid collection channel downstream of the outlet; a flow path interruption structure positioned between the sensing chamber outlet and the liquid collection channel, wherein the flow path interruption structure is configured to prevent upstream liquid from flowing into the liquid collection channel, a conditioning liquid contained in a flow path connecting from the sample input port to the flow path interruption such that the sensor is covered by liquid and unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface.
According to one embodiment there is provided a microfluidic device for analysing a test liquid comprising one or more of the following features: a sensor provided in a sensing chamber; a flow path comprising a liquid inlet and a liquid outlet connecting to the sensing chamber for respectively passing liquid into and out of the sensing chamber, and a sample input port in fluid communication with the inlet; a liquid collection channel downstream of the outlet; a flow path interruption structure positioned between the sensing chamber outlet and the liquid collection channel, wherein the flow path interruption structure is configured to complete the flow path between the sample input port and the liquid collection channel; a conditioning liquid contained in a flow path connecting from the sample input port to the flow path interruption such that the sensor is covered by liquid and unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface; wherein the dimensions of the sample input port and liquid collection channel are configured such that the sensor remains unexposed to a gas or gas/liquid interface and the application of respectively one or more volumes of test liquid to a wet surface of the input port provides a net driving force sufficient to introduce the one or more volumes of test liquid into the device and displace buffer liquid into the liquid collection channel.
The invention is described below with reference to exemplary Figures, in which:
The present disclosure allows for a microfluidic device, using a “wet-sensor” (i.e. a sensor that functions in a wet environment) to be produced and stored in a state in which the sensor is kept wet, until it is needed. This is effectively achieved by providing a device that has an “inactive” state in which the sensor is kept wet, but in which the device cannot be used, and an “active” state in which the device can be used. In other words, an “inactive” state can be a state in which a flow path between a sample input port and a liquid collection channel is not complete, as discussed below. In contrast an “active” state, can be a state in which the flow path between a sample input port and a liquid collection channel is complete. A particular benefit of keeping the sensor wet when considering nanopore sensors (see more detail below) is to ensure that well liquid does not escape through the membrane. The membrane is very thin and the sensor is very sensitive to moisture loss. Moisture loss can create for example a resistive air gap between the well liquid and the membrane thus breaking the electrical circuit between an electrode provided in the well and in the sample. Moisture loss can also serve to increase the ionic strength of the well liquid, which could affect the potential difference across the nanopore. The potential difference has an effect on the measured signal and thus any change would have an effect on the measurement values.
In any case the device of the invention can be maintained in the “inactive” state for a long period of time until it is required. During that time, for example, the device could be transported (e.g. shipped from a supplier to an end user), as the “inactive” state is robust and capable of maintaining the sensor in a wet condition, even when the device is in a non-standard orientation (i.e. orientations in which the device is not used to perform its normal function). This is possible because the inactive states seals an internal volume of the device, containing the sensor, from the surroundings. That internal volume (referred to as a ‘saturated volume’ below) is filled with liquid. The absence of any air gaps and/or bubbles means the sensor isolated from the possibility of a gas/air interface intersecting with the sensor (which could damage the functionality of the sensor) even if the device is moved around. Further, even in the active state, the device is able to maintain the sensor in a wet condition, for a long period of time, even if the device is activated and then not used.
The sensing chamber 37 is provided with a sensor, which is not shown in
The sensor may comprise an electrode pair. One of more of the electrodes may be functionalised in order to detect an analyte. One or more of the electrodes may be coated with a selectively permeable membrane such as Nafion™.
An example design of such an electrical circuit 26 is shown in
In this implementation, the electrode 24 is used as the array electrode and the electrode 21 is used as the common electrode. Thus the electrical circuit 26 provides the electrode 24 with a bias voltage potential relative to the electrode 21 which is itself at virtual ground potential and supplies the current signal to the electrical circuit 26.
The electrical circuit 26 has a bias circuit 40 connected to the electrode 24 and arranged to apply a bias voltage which effectively appears across the two electrodes 21 and 24.
The electrical circuit 26 also has an amplifier circuit 41 connected to the electrode 21 for amplifying the electrical current signal appearing across the two electrodes 21 and 24. Typically, the amplifier circuit 41 consists of a two amplifier stages 42 and 43.
The input amplifier stage 42 connected to the electrode 21 converts the current signal into a voltage signal.
The input amplifier stage 42 may comprise a trans-impedance amplifier, such as an electrometer operational amplifier configured as an inverting amplifier with a high impedance feedback resistor, of for example 500MΩ, to provide the gain necessary to amplify the current signal which typically has a magnitude of the order of tens to hundreds of pA.
Alternatively, the input amplifier stage 42 may comprise a switched integrator amplifier. This is preferred for very small signals as the feedback element is a capacitor and virtually noiseless. In addition, a switched integrator amplifier has wider bandwidth capability. However, the integrator does have a dead time due to the necessity to reset the integrator before output saturation occurs. This dead time may be reduced to around a microsecond so is not of much consequence if the sampling rate required is much higher. A transimpedance amplifier is simpler if the bandwidth required is smaller. Generally, the switched integrator amplifier output is sampled at the end of each sampling period followed by a reset pulse. Additional techniques can be used to sample the start of integration eliminating small errors in the system.
The second amplifier stage 43 amplifies and filters the voltage signal output by the first amplifier stage 42. The second amplifier stage 43 provides sufficient gain to raise the signal to a sufficient level for processing in a data acquisition unit 44. For example with a 500MΩ feedback resistance in the first amplifier stage 42, the input voltage to the second amplifier stage 43, given a typical current signal of the order of 100 pA, will be of the order of 50 mV, and in this case the second amplifier stage 43 must provide a gain of 50 to raise the 50 mV signal range to 2.5V.
The electrical circuit 26 includes a data acquisition unit 44 which may be a microprocessor running an appropriate program or may include dedicated hardware. In this case, the bias circuit 40 is simply formed by an inverting amplifier supplied with a signal from a digital-to-analog converter 46 which may be either a dedicated device or a part of the data acquisition unit 44 and which provides a voltage output dependent on the code loaded into the data acquisition unit 44 from software. Similarly, the signals from the amplifier circuit 41 are supplied to the data acquisition card 40 through an analog-to-digital converter 47.
The various components of the electrical circuit 26 may be formed by separate components or any of the components may be integrated into a common semiconductor chip. The components of the electrical circuit 26 may be formed by components arranged on a printed circuit board. In order to process multiple signals from the array of electrodes the electrical circuit 26 is modified essentially by replicating the amplifier circuit 41 and A/D converter 47 for each electrode 21 to allow acquisition of signals from each recess 5 in parallel. In the case that the input amplifier stage 42 comprises switched integrators then those would require a digital control system to handle the sample-and-hold signal and reset integrator signals. The digital control system is most conveniently configured on a field-programmable-gate-array device (FPGA). In addition the FPGA can incorporate processor-like functions and logic required to interface with standard communication protocols i.e. USB and Ethernet. Due to the fact that the electrode 21 is held at ground, it is practical to provide it as common to the array of electrodes.
In such a system, polymers such as polynucleotides or nucleic acids, polypeptides such as a protein, polysaccharides or any other polymers (natural or synthetic) may be passed through a suitably sized nanopore. In the case of a polynucleotide or nucleic acid, the polymer unit may be nucleotides. As such, molecules pass through a nanopore, whilst the electrical properties across the nanopore are monitored and a signal, characteristic of the particular polymer units passing through the nanopore, is obtained. The signal can thus be used to identify the sequence of polymer units in the polymer molecule or determine a sequence characteristic. A variety of different types of measurements may be made. This includes without limitation: electrical measurements and optical measurements. A suitable optical method involving the measurement of fluorescence is disclosed by J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 1652-1653. Possible electrical measurements include: current measurements, impedance measurements, tunneling measurements (Ivanov A P et al., Nano Lett. 2011 Jan. 12; 11(1):279-85), and FET measurements (International Application WO 2005/124888). Optical measurements may be combined with electrical measurements (Soni G V et al., Rev Sci Instrum. 2010 January; 81(1):014301). The measurement may be a transmembrane current measurement such as measurement of ionic current flowing through the pore.
The polymer may be a polynucleotide (or nucleic acid), a polypeptide such as a protein, a polysaccharide, or any other polymer. The polymer may be natural or synthetic. The polymer units may be nucleotides. The nucleotides may be of different types that include different nucleobases.
The nanopore may be a transmembrane protein pore, selected for example from MspA, lysenin, alpha-hemolysin, CsgG or variants or mutations thereof.
The polynucleotide may be deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), cDNA or a synthetic nucleic acid known in the art, such as peptide nucleic acid (PNA), glycerol nucleic acid (GNA), threose nucleic acid (TNA), locked nucleic acid (LNA) or other synthetic polymers with nucleotide side chains. The polynucleotide may be single-stranded, be double-stranded or comprise both single-stranded and double-stranded regions. Typically cDNA, RNA, GNA, TNA or LNA are single stranded.
In some embodiments, the devices and/or methods described herein may be used to identify any nucleotide. The nucleotide can be naturally occurring or artificial. A nucleotide typically contains a nucleobase (which may be shortened herein to “base”), a sugar and at least one phosphate group. The nucleobase is typically heterocyclic. Suitable nucleobases include purines and pyrimidines and more specifically adenine, guanine, thymine, uracil and cytosine. The sugar is typically a pentose sugar. Suitable sugars include, but are not limited to, ribose and deoxyribose. The nucleotide is typically a ribonucleotide or deoxyribonucleotide. The nucleotide typically contains a monophosphate, diphosphate or triphosphate.
The nucleotide can include a damaged or epigenetic base. The nucleotide can be labelled or modified to act as a marker with a distinct signal. This technique can be used to identify the absence of a base, for example, an abasic unit or spacer in the polynucleotide.
Of particular use when considering measurements of modified or damaged DNA (or similar systems) are the methods where complementary data are considered. The additional information provided allows distinction between a larger number of underlying states.
The polymer may also be a type of polymer other than a polynucleotide, some non-limitative examples of which are as follows.
The polymer may be a polypeptide, in which case the polymer units may be amino acids that are naturally occurring or synthetic.
The polymer may be a polysaccharide, in which case the polymer units may be monosaccharides.
A conditioning liquid provided in the device to maintain the sensor in a wet state may be any liquid that is compatible with the device (e.g., a liquid that does not adversely affect the performance of the sensor) By way of example only, when the sensor comprise a protein nanopore, it would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the conditioning liquid should be free of an agent that denatures or inactivates proteins. The conditioning liquid may for example comprise a buffer liquid, e.g., an ionic liquid or ionic solution. The conditioning liquid may contain a buffering agent to maintain the pH of the solution.
The sensor is one that needs to be maintained in a ‘wet condition’, namely one which is covered by a liquid. The sensor may comprise a membrane, such as for example an ion selective membrane or amphiphilic membrane. The membrane, which may be amphiphilic, may comprise an ion channel such as a nanopore.
The membrane, which may be amphiphilic, may be a lipid bilayer or a synthetic layer. The synthetic layer may be a diblock or triblock copolymer.
The membrane may comprise an ion channel, such an ion selective channel, for the detection of anions and cations. The ion channel may be selected from known ionophores such as valinomycin, gramicidin and 14 crown 4 derivatives.
Returning to
Downstream from the outlet 39 of the sensing chamber 37 is a liquid collection channel 32. The liquid collection channel can be a waste collection reservoir, and is for receiving fluid that has been expelled from the sensing chamber 37. At the most downstream end, e.g. the end portion, of the collection channel 32 is a breather port 58, for allowing gas to be expelled as the collection channel 32 receives liquid from the sensing chamber and fills with the liquid.
In the example shown in
As described below in more, the device is configured to accept a sample at the sample input port, which is subsequently drawn into the sensing chamber of its own accord, without the aid of an external force or pressure, e.g. by capillary pressure as described below. This removes the need for the user to introduce a test liquid into the device under an applied positive pressure.
In
In some embodiments, the valve 31 serves a dual function. For example, as shown in
As a result, the sensing chamber 37 can be pre-filled with a conditioning liquid, such as a buffer, before turning the valve 31 into the position shown in
It is also instructive to consider the scale of the features presented in
The purge port 34 and the sample input port 33 may be of similar design, as both are configured to receive a fluid to be delivered to the device 30. In some embodiments, the ports 33 and/or 34 may be designed to accommodate the use of a liquid delivery device, e.g., a pipette tip, to introduce liquid into the ports. In preferred embodiments, both ports have a diameter of around 0.4 to 0.7 mm, which allows for wicking of fluid into the ports whilst also limiting the possibility of the device 30 free-draining of liquid (discussed in more detail below). In contrast the size of the downstream breather port 58 is less important, as it is not intended, in routine use, for accepting liquid delivery devices (e.g., pipettes) or delivering liquid.
The size of the sensor any vary and depend upon the type and the number of sensing elements, for example nanopores or ion selective electrodes, provided in the sensor. The size of the sensor 35 may be around 8×15 mm. As discussed above, it can be an array of sensing channels, with a microscopic surface geometry that contains membranes with nanopores.
The ‘saturated volume’ of the device 30 is the volume, e.g. the flow path volume, connecting between the valves 31 (one valve controls flow between the liquid outlet 39 and the liquid collection channel 32, and another valve controls flow between the buffer liquid input port 34 and the sensing chamber 37) that can be filled with liquid and sealed and isolated from the surroundings when the plug 33a is present, i.e. to seal the simple input port 33, and valves 31 are configured in a closed state. In one embodiment, the saturated volume can be around 200 μl, which can vary depending on the design of the flow path in the devices described herein. However, smaller volumes are more preferable (to reduce the size of sample required, for example) and preferably the saturated volume is 20 μl or less. In other configurations, the provision of the purge port 34 (and connecting fluid path to the sensing chamber 37) may not be necessary, in which case the saturated volume will extend from the sealed sample input port 33 to the sensing chamber 37 and past the liquid outlet 39 to the flow path interruption 36.
In contrast it is desirable for the liquid collection channel 32 to have a much larger volume, e.g., a volume that is at least 3-fold larger, e.g., at least 4-fold larger, at least 5-fold larger, at least 10-fold larger, or at least 15-fold larger, than the saturated volume, so it can collect liquid expelled from the saturated volume over several cycles of testing and flushing. In one embodiment, the liquid collection channel 32 may have a volume of 2000 μl, The hydraulic radius of the liquid collection channel is typically 4 mm or less.
The sizes of the valves 31 are not particularly important (and, as discussed below, alternative flow channel interruptions can be provided). They serve the function of isolating the saturated volume in connection with the plug 33a.
Further, even in the active state, the device is resistant to the sensing chamber 37 drying out. This is discussed below, with reference to
In
In the diagram, several parameters and dimensions are indicated. Heights (measured in metres) are indicated by the symbol h. Radii of curvature (measured in metres) are indicated by the symbol R. Radii of the tubular parts (measured in metres) are indicated by the symbol r. Surface tension (measured in N/m) is indicated by the symbol γ. Liquid density (measured in kg/m3) is indicated by the symbol ρ. Flow rates (measured in m3/s) is indicated by the symbol . Contact angles (measured in degrees) of liquid/gas meniscii with the device 30 walls, are indicated by the symbol θ. The subscripts “i” are used to refer to conditions at the inlet, the subscript “c” is used to indicate conditions at the constriction, and the subscript “o” is used to indicate conditions at the outlet.
The behaviour of fluid in the depicted system is controlled by capillary and/or Laplace bubble pressures and Poiseuille pressure drops to limit flow rates. As is generally known, capillary pressure at a meniscus can be calculated using the equation:
where R1 and R2 are radii of curvature in perpendicular directions. In the case of a tube, such as a capillary, the radius of curvature R1 is the same as the radius of curvature R2 and the radius of curvature is related to the radius of the tube by the following equation:
Further, in a rectangular channel, where R1 is not the same as R2, the radii of curvature are given by the following equations:
where a is e.g. the width of the rectangular section, and b is the height of the rectangular section.
For incompressible Newtonian fluids, assuming un-accelerated lamina flow in a pipe of constant circular cross-section that is substantially longer than its diameter, the pressure losses can be calculated from the Hagen-Poiseuille equation:
where μ is the viscosity (measured in N·s/m2) of the liquid, l is the length of the tube through which flow occurs (in metres) and r is the radius of the tube (in metres).
Finally, static pressure is calculated according to the following equation:
Ph=pgh Equation 5
in which g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2), and h is the height of the fluid column.
Pci≥Pco+pg·δh
From this equation, in combination with equations 1 and 2, the maximum height difference δh before free draining occurs can be deduced (assuming the same contact angle θ at the inlet and the outlet):
Substituting typical values of the relevant variables (e.g. ri=0.4 mm, r0=3.0 mm, θ=82°, ρ=1000 kg/m3, γ=0.072 N/m), indicates that a difference in height of about 4 mm can be achieved before the inlet de-wets.
Considering this further, and as shown in
Pci≥Ph+Pco
and in the limit:
Again, using the typical values mentioned above, this indicates that the allowable difference in height between the inlet to the sensing chamber and the downstream meniscus and the waste outlet can be of the order of 36 mm. As a result, even if the inlet port 33 itself does not remain wetted, it is unlikely that the sensing chamber 37 will de-wet in normal use, as this is quite a substantial height difference, which would indicate an unusual amount of tilting.
Further, it is unlikely that the sensing chamber will de-wet by dripping out of the inlet. As shown in
Pci≥Ph−Pco
and in the limit:
Once again, substituting typical values indicates that the maximum allowable δh is of the order of 37 mm. Once again, this is well within a tolerable range for normal handling in use.
Therefore, from the above analysis, it can be seen that once the device 30 is switched from an inactive state to an active state, the liquid sensor 35 will remain wetted, in normal conditions. Further, even if the input port 33 becomes de-wetted, this will not necessarily result in the sensor being exposed to a gas/liquid interface, because the interface is likely to be pinned at the entrance to the sensing chamber 37.
It is also possible to consider how this stability affects the ability to deliver sample to the sensing chamber 37. In
Applying the typical values (including μ=8.9×10−4N·s/m2 and l=3 mm), a flowrate of 25 μl/s can be derived. This is more than sufficient when sample volumes are low, such as in microfluidic devices having a total volume of around 200 μl for example.
In another extreme, shown in
For a 1 mm droplet, the pressure is around 144 Pa (using the typical values). A 2D approximation, in comparison to the puddle wicking scenario, indicates that this around 20 times greater, and so a flowrate of around 500 μl/s can be expected for the same viscous drag.
As a result, it can be seen that the device 30, e.g., the dimensions of the inlet 38 and outlet 39 as well as the liquid collection channel 32, can be configured not only to robustly maintain a wetted state in the sensing chamber 37, but may also to operate easily to draw fluid into the sensing chamber 37. When the sample has been supplied, the device 30 returns to a new equilibrium, in which the device will not de-wet/drain dry. That is, the device 30 is configured to avoid free draining of the sensing chamber 37. In particular, the sample input port 33, the sensing chamber inlet 38 and the liquid collection channel 32 are configured to avoid such draining, such that when the activation system has been operated to complete the flow path downstream of the sensing chamber 37, the sensor 35 remains unexposed to gas or a gas/liquid interface even whilst the device 30 is tilted. Put another way, the sensing chamber inlet 33 and the liquid collection channel 32 are thus configured to balance capillary pressures and flow resistances to avoid free draining of the sensing chamber 37 when the flow path is completed.
In considering how the sensing chamber inlet and liquid collection channel are configured to balance capillary pressures and flow resistances, it is helpful to consider the how the device practically functions. Priming of the device into its ‘active state’ is achieved by completing the flow path between the liquid outlet and the liquid collection channel 32. The capillary pressures at the downstream collection channel and the sample input port are balanced such that following activation of the device, gas is not drawn into the sample inlet port, and the sample input port presents a wet surface to a test liquid. If it were the case that the capillary pressure at the liquid collection channel was greater than at the sample input port, the device would drain following activation, with buffer liquid being drawn into the collection channel.
Following activation of the device and prior to addition of a test liquid, the device may be considered to be at equilibrium, namely wherein the pressure at the input port is equal to the pressure at the downstream collection channel. In this equilibrium state, liquid remains in the sensing chamber and gas is not drawn into the input port such that the input port presents a wet surface to a test liquid to be introduced into the device. The device is configured to ensure that balance of forces are such that the sensing chamber remains filled with liquid and that liquid remains (at least partially) in the inlet, in the outlet and the liquid collection channel. If the equilibrium is disturbed by shifting the position of the liquid (without adding or removing liquid to the system) there is an impetus to return to that equilibrium. When the liquid is moved, it will create new gas/liquid interfaces. Thus this balance of force and restoring of the equilibrium will effectively be controlled by the capillary forces at those interfaces.
Ideally, the balance of force is such that following activation or addition of a volume of liquid, the liquid fills the sample input port and presents a wet surface. However, some adjustment may be necessary following activation/perfusion in order to provide a wet surface at the sample input port. In any case, the inlet port is configured such that following addition of a test liquid to the port, the capillary pressure at the input port is less than the capillary pressure at the downstream collection channel. This provides the driving force to draw test liquid into the device thereby displacing liquid from the sensing chamber into the liquid collection channel. This continues until the pressures at the sample input port and the liquid collection channel once more reach equilibrium. This driving force may be provided by the change in shape of a volume of liquid applied to the input port, as outlined by equation 1, wherein a volume of fluid applied to the port, such as shown in
A further volume of sample may be subsequently applied to the device in order to further displace buffer liquid from the sensing chamber. This may be repeated a number of times such that the buffer liquid is removed from the sensor in sensing chamber and replaced by the test liquid. The number of times required to completely displace buffer liquid from the sensor will be determined by the internal volume of the device, the volume of test sample applied as well as the degree of driving force that may be achieved.
Thus in this particular embodiment, a test liquid may be drawn into the device and displace the buffer liquid without the need for the user to apply additional positive pressure, for example by use of a pipette. This has the advantage of simplifying the application of a test liquid to the device. Surprisingly and advantageously, the invention provides a device that may be provided in a ‘wet state’ wherein liquid may be displaced from the device by the mere application of another liquid to the device.
Further, the above analysis considers only a linear configuration.
Further, even if the sample input port 33 does de-wet, device 30 may be operable so as to re-prime the system in the active state. In the
However, in other embodiments at least the downstream part of valve 31 of the
In
Some operating scenarios of the microfluidic device 30 of the present invention (i.e. as exemplified by
In a first configuration, valve 31 is open, as is sample port 33 (i.e. plug 33A is not present). Purge port/buffer supply port 34 is closed. In this configuration, a pipette may be used at breather port 38 to withdraw all liquid, including from the sample cell. Alternatively, if liquid is supplied to this port, it will displace fluid through the waste reservoir 32 into the sensor chamber 37 and out of the sample port 33.
In another configuration, valve 31 and sample input port 33 are open and breather port 58 is sealed. In this scenario, a pipette can provide fluid into the purge port 34, which will force fluid through the cell, into the sample chamber 37 (i.e. through the saturated volume) and downstream into the reservoir 32. This will also cause the sample input port 33 to wet if it has de-wetted. Alternatively, if the pipette is used to drain liquid, it is possible to drain the sensor chamber and the upstream portion of the device.
In another configuration, the valve 31, the purge port 34 and the breather port 58 are all open. In this configuration, a pipette may be supplied to the sample input port 33 to provide sample into the sensor chamber. Alternatively, if the pipette is applied to drain liquid from the sample input port 33, the sensor chamber 37 can be drained. If this is done slowly, it is also possible to draw liquid back from the waste reservoir 32.
In another scenario, the valve 31 and the purge port 34 are open, whilst the breather port 58 is closed. In this scenario, it is possible to apply fluid via the sample input port 33 to force fluid out of the purge port 34, if required. Alternatively, extracting liquid from the sample input port 33 will draw air into the cell via the purge port.
In another configuration, the valve 31 and the breather port 58 are open, whilst the purge port 34 is closed. In this scenario, a fluid supplied to the sample input port 33 can be pushed into the cell more quickly, without fluid spilling from the purge port. Alternatively, extracting fluid from the sample input port 33 in this scenario will drain the cell and the downstream waste, if done quickly.
In a further two configurations, the valve 31 is closed. In some configurations, closing valve 31 may connect the upstream purge port 34 to the downstream waste reservoir 32, at the same time as isolating the sensing chamber (i.e. in the arrangement of
The preceding description is provided by way of example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1611770 | Jul 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2017/051991 | 7/6/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/007819 | 1/11/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3799743 | Alexander et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4154795 | Thorne | May 1979 | A |
5234566 | Osman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5403451 | Riviello et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5503803 | Brown et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6056922 | Ikematsu | May 2000 | A |
6300141 | Segal et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6479288 | Laffafian et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483931 | Kalnitsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6503452 | Boxer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6699697 | Klemic et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6863833 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6913697 | Lopez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6916488 | Meier et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7077939 | Crooks et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7144486 | Fritsch et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7169272 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7745116 | Williams | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7939270 | Holden et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8124191 | Ervin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8461854 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9057102 | Turner et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9546400 | Turner et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9556480 | Turner et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9613247 | Yang | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9678056 | Turner et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9734382 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738929 | Turner et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9927398 | Reid et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10036065 | Jones | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10215768 | Sanghera et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10338056 | Hyde et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10416117 | Reid et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10549274 | Brown et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10814298 | Hyde et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11084015 | Hyde et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11097269 | Goto et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20020074227 | Nisch et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123048 | Gau | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144905 | Schmidt | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030015422 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030075445 | Woudenberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030098248 | Vogel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111340 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030148401 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030224523 | Thornberg et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022677 | Wohlstadter et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040096358 | Blankstein et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040171169 | Kallury et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050014162 | Barth et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050133101 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050230272 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279634 | Ozaki et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060079009 | Salmon et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060163063 | Picollet-Dahan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060194331 | Pamula et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060257941 | McDevitt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070035308 | Ide | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070161101 | Takeuchi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070275480 | Brander et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080254995 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090072332 | Dekker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090142504 | Ervin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167288 | Reid et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100035349 | Bau et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100147450 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100190253 | Tazaki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100196203 | Sanghera et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100304980 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110120871 | Reid et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121840 | Sanghera et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110214991 | Kim et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110274737 | Palmaz | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287414 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110318774 | Larsen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010085 | Rava et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130048499 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071932 | Itchoda et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130140192 | Behrends et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130196442 | Momose et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207205 | Chen | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217106 | Jones et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130270521 | Peng et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130309776 | Drndic et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140190833 | Lieber et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140243214 | Haga et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140255921 | Moysey et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296083 | Brown et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140318964 | Dunbar et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140329693 | Reid et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140335512 | Moysey et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140346059 | Akeson | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140346515 | Yanagi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150014160 | Hyde et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150027885 | Rajaraman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150065354 | Moysey et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150191709 | Heron et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198611 | Ostrowski et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204763 | Stelzle et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150218629 | Heron et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150232923 | Drndic et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150265994 | Hyde et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150268256 | Sanghera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150300986 | Reid et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160040230 | Akeson | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160231307 | Xie | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160257942 | Bruce et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170189906 | Moll et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170326550 | Brown et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170363577 | Reid et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180321188 | Reid et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190242913 | Sanghera et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190391128 | Hyde et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200292521 | Xie et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210086160 | Hyde et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210170403 | Waterman | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210300750 | Waterman | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220023819 | Hyde et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003240941 | Dec 2003 | AU |
1303147 | Jul 2001 | CN |
1434461 | Aug 2003 | CN |
1500555 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101078704 | Nov 2007 | CN |
100448007 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101490277 | Jul 2009 | CN |
100571871 | Dec 2009 | CN |
102263104 | Nov 2011 | CN |
203466320 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103370617 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103995035 | Aug 2014 | CN |
205828393 | Dec 2016 | CN |
106457247 | Feb 2017 | CN |
102010022929 | Dec 2011 | DE |
0532215 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1110084 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1120469 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1419818 | May 2004 | EP |
1535667 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1669746 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1677102 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1688742 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1710578 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1712909 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1779921 | May 2007 | EP |
2219032 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2237390 | May 1991 | GB |
2446823 | Aug 2008 | GB |
S5-274882 | Jun 1977 | JP |
4014773 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4127066 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4-215052 | Aug 1992 | JP |
7307172 | Nov 1995 | JP |
2004-158330 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005-98718 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-164276 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-300460 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2005-539242 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-312141 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2008-194573 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009-128206 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2010186677 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2012-247231 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-242247 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2014-190891 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2015-064373 | Apr 2015 | JP |
10-2017-0012367 | Feb 2017 | KR |
WO 1988008534 | Nov 1988 | WO |
WO 9425862 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9716545 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9858248 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 1999013101 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 2000013014 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 2000025121 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2000028312 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 2001059447 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2002024862 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2002029402 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2002035221 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2002082046 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2003052420 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2005040783 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005124888 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012571 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076703 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006100484 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006104639 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006113550 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006138160 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007028003 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007049576 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007116978 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007127327 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132002 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008012552 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008054611 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008102120 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008102121 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008124107 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008137008 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008156041 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009024775 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009035647 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009077734 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010086603 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010122293 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2010142954 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011046706 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011067559 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011118211 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011154114 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012033524 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012042226 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012107778 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012138357 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO 2013041878 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2013057495 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013121193 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013121224 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013123379 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO 2013153359 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014013260 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014019603 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014064443 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014064444 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014158665 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2015183871 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015193076 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2016034591 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016059427 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO 2016127007 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016172724 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2016187519 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO 2017061600 | Apr 2017 | WO |
WO 2018007819 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2019063959 | Apr 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
[No Author Listed] Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. Avanti Polar Lipids—Preparations of Liposomes. Www.avantilipids.com 5 pages. Jul. 1, 2014. |
Aghdaei et al., Formation of artificial lipid bilayers using droplet dielectrophoresis. Lab Chip. Oct. 2008;8(10):1617-20. doi: 10.1039/b807374k. Epub Aug. 13, 2008. |
Anrather et al., Supported membrane nanodevices. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. Jan.-Feb. 2004;4(1-2):1-22. |
Astier et al., Toward single molecule DNA sequencing: direct identification of ribonucleoside and deoxyribonucleoside 5′-monophosphates by using an engineered protein nanopore equipped with a molecular adapter. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 8, 2006;128(5):1705-10. |
Baaken et al., Planar microelectrode-cavity array for high-resolution and parallel electrical recording of membrane ionic currents. Lab Chip. Jun. 2008;8(6):938-44. doi: 10.1039/b800431e. Epub Apr. 16, 2008. |
Bezrukov et al., Counting polymers moving through a single ion channel. Nature. Jul. 28, 1994;370(6487):279-81. |
Bouaidat et al., Surface-directed capillary system; theory, experiments and applications. Lab Chip. Aug. 2005;5(8):827-36. Epub Jul. 1, 2005. |
Bruggemann et al., Microchip technology for automated and parallel patch-clamp recording. Small. Jul. 2006;2(7):840-6. |
Bull et al., Polymer Films on Electrodes. J. Electrochem Soc. May 1982;129(5):1009-1015. |
Cheng et al., Discrete membrane arrays. J Biotechnol. Sep. 2000;74(3):159-74. |
Cheng et al., Single Ion Channel Sensitivity in Suspended Bilayers on Micromachined Supports. Langmuir. 2001; 17(4):1240-1242. |
Danelon et al., Cell membranes suspended across nanoaperture arrays. Langmuir. Jan. 3, 2006;22(1):22-5. |
Estes et al., Electroformation of giant liposomes from spin-coated films of lipids. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. May 10, 2005;42(2):115-23. |
Funakoshi et al., Lipid bilayer formation by contacting monolayers in a microfluidic device for membrane protein analysis. Anal Chem. Dec. 15, 2006;78(24):8169-74. |
Garstecki et al., Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip. Mar. 2006;6(3):437-46. Epub Jan. 25, 2006. Erratum in: Lab Chip. May 2006;6(5):693. |
Hasanzadeh et al., Room-temperature ionic liquid-based electrochemical nanobiosensors. Trends Anal Chem. Dec. 2012;41:58-74. |
Heron et al., Simultaneous measurement of ionic current and fluorescence from single protein pores. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 11, 2009;131(5):1652-3. doi: 10.1021/ja808128s. |
Hirano et al., Lipid Bilayers at Gel/Gel Interface for Ion Channel Recordings. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 2008;6:130-133. |
Holden et al., Functional bionetworks from nanoliter water droplets. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 11, 2007;129(27):8650-5. Epub Jun. 16, 2007. |
Hovis et al., Patterning and Composition Arrays of Supported Lipid Bilayers by Microcontact Printing. Langmuir. 2001;17:3400-3405. |
Hromada et al., Single molecule measurements within individual membrane-bound ion channels using a polymer-based bilayer lipid membrane chip. Lab Chip. Apr. 2008;8(4):602-8. doi:10.1039/b716388f. Epub Feb. 29, 2008. |
Ide et al., A novel method for artificial lipid-bilayer formation. Biosens Bioelectron. Oct. 15, 2005;21(4):672-7. Epub Jan. 26, 2005. |
Ikariyama et al., Polypyrrole electrode as a detector for electroinactive anions by flow injection analysis. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 8, 1803-1806. |
Jeon et al., Long-term storable and shippable lipid bilayer membrane platform. Lab Chip. Oct. 2008;8(10):1742-4. doi: 10.1039/b807932c. Epub Aug. 22, 2008. |
Jung et al., Detecting protein-ligand binding on supported bilayers by local pH modulation. J Am Chem Soc. Jan. 28, 2009;131(3):1006-14. doi: 10.1021/ja804542p. |
Kam et al., Spatially Selective Manipulation of Supported Lipid Bilayers by Laminar Flow: Steps Toward Biomembrane Microfluidic. Langmuir. 2003;19(5):1624-1631. |
Kasianowicz et al., Protonation dynamics of the alpha-toxin ion channel from spectral analysis of pH-dependent current fluctuations. Biophys J. Jul. 1995;69(1):94-105. |
Khafizov, Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Of Single Stranded Dna Binding Protein And Rep Helicase. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dissertation. 2012. |
Kim et al., Liquid-slate field-effect transistors using electrowetting. Applied Physics Letters. 2007;90:043507-1-043507-3. |
Korolev et al., Major domain swiveling revealed by the crystal structures of complexes of E. coli Rep helicase bound to single-stranded DNA and ADP. Cell. Aug. 22, 1997;90(4):635-47. |
Krantz Lab. Planar Lip Bilayer Electrohpysiology Equipment. Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley. Oct. 6, 2007. Last accessed at mcb.berkeley.edu/labs/krantz/equipment/blm.html on Nov. 26, 2014. |
Kung et al., Printing via Photolithography on Micropartitioned Fluid Lipid Membranes. Adv. Materials. 2000;12(10):731-734. |
Langecker et al., Synthetic lipid membrane channels formed by designed DNA nanostructures. Science. Nov. 16, 2012;338(6109):932-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1225624. |
Le Pioufle et al., Lipid bilayer microarray for parallel recording of transmembrane ion currents. Anal Chem. Jan. 1, 2008;80(1):328-32. Epub Nov. 15, 2007. |
Lee et al., Ion channel switch array: A biosensor for detecting multiple pathogens. Industrial Biotechnology. May 2005;1(1):26-31. doi:10.1089/ind.2005.1.26. |
Lee et al., Nanoarrays of tethered lipid bilayer rafts on poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels. Lab Chip. Jan. 7, 2009;9(1):132-9. doi: 10.1039/b809732a. Epub Oct. 22, 2008. |
Lee et al., Polyelectrolyte Micropatterning Using Agarose Plane Stamp and a Substrate Having Microscale Features on Its Surface. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., vol. 26(10):1539-1542 (2005). |
Lewis et al., The Mesomorphic Phase Behavior of Lipid Bilayers. Structure Biological Membranes. 3rd Ed. Ed: Yeagle. CRC Press 2011. 19-89. |
Li et al., Microfluidic system for planar patch clamp electrode arrays. Nano Lett. Apr. 2006;6(4):815-9. |
Lieberman et al., Processive replication of single DNA molecules in a nanopore catalyzed by phi29 DNA polymerase. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 22, 2010;132(50):17961-72. doi:10.1021/ja1087612. Epub Dec. 1, 2010. |
Luan et al., Base-by-base ratcheting of single stranded DNA through a solid-state nanopore. Phys Rev Lett. Jun. 11, 2010;104(23):238103. Epub Jun. 10, 2010. |
Mach et al., Miniaturized planar lipid bilayer: increased stability, low electric noise and fast fluid perfusion. Anal Bioanal Chem. Feb. 2008;390(3):841-6. Epub Oct. 31, 2007. |
Majd et al., Hydrogel stamping of arrays of supported lipid bilayers with various lipid compositions for the screening of drug-membrane and protein-membrane interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Oct. 21, 2005;44(41):6697-700. |
Malmstadt et al., Automated formation of lipid-bilayer membranes in a microfluidic device. Nano Lett. Sep. 2006;6(9):1961-5. |
Mangold et al., Reference electrodes based on conducting polymers. Fresenius J Anal Chem. Jun. 2000;367(4):340-2. |
Mastrangeli et al., Challenges for Capillary Self-Assembly of Microsystems. IEEE Transactions. Jan. 2011;1(1):133-149. |
Mastrangeli et al., Self-assembly from milli- to nanoscales: methods and applications. J Micro Microeng. 2009;19:083001. |
Maurer et al., Reconstitution of ion channels in agarose-supported silicon orifices. Biosens Bioelectron. May 15, 2007;22(11):2577-84. Epub Nov. 13, 2006. |
Mcalduff et al., Freestanding lipid bilayers as substrates for electron cryomicroscopy of integral membrane proteins. J Microsc. Feb. 2002;205(Pt 2):113-7. |
Montal et al., Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 1972;69(12):3561-6. |
Moran-Mirabal et al., Micrometer-sized supported lipid bilayer arrays for bacterial toxin binding studies through total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J. Jul. 2005;89(1):296-305. Epub Apr. 15, 2005. |
Ogier et al., Suspended Planar Phospholipid Bilayers on Micromachined Supports, Langmuir, vol. 16:5696-5701 (2000). |
Onoe et al., Three-Dimensional Micro-Self-Assembly Using Hydrophobic Interaction Controlled by Self-Assembled Monolayers. J Micro Systems. Aug. 2004;13(4):603-611. |
Parthasarathy et al., Protein patterns at lipid bilayer junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug. 31, 2004;101(35):12798-803. Epub Aug. 20, 2004. |
Peterman et al., “Ion Channels and Lipid Bilayer Membranes Under High Potentials Using Microfabricaled Apertures,” Biomedical Microdevices, vol. 4(3):231-236 (2002). |
Polk et al., Ag/AgC1 microelectrodes with improved stability for microfluidics, Sensors and Actuators B., vol. 114:239-247 (2006). |
Rauf et al., Studies on sildenafil citrate (Viagra) interaction with DNA using electrochemical DNA biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. May 15, 2007;22(11):2471-7. Epub Nov. 7, 2006. |
Romer et al., Impedance analysis and single-channel recordings on nano-black lipid membranes based on porous alumina. Biophys J. Feb. 2004;86(2):955-65. |
Sackmann, Supported membranes: scientific and practical applications. Science. Jan. 5, 1996;271(5245):43-8. |
Sandison et al., “Rapid fabrication of polymer microfluidic systems for the production of artificial lipid bilayers,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 15:S139-S144 (2005). |
Sandison et al., Air-exposure technique for the formation of artificial lipid bilayers in microsystems. Langmuir. Jul. 17, 2007;23(15):8277-84. Epub Jun. 22, 2007. |
Sapra et al., Lipid-coated hydrogel shapes as components of electrical circuits and mechanical devices. Sci Rep. 2012;2:848. doi: 10.1038/srep00848. Epub Nov. 14, 2012. |
Sarles et al., Bilayer formation between lipid-encased hydrogels contained in solid substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. Dec. 2010;2(12):3654-63. doi: 10.1021/am100826s. Epub Nov. 10, 2010. |
Schindler et al., Branched bimolecular lipid membranes. Biophys J. Sep. 1976;16(9):1109-13. |
Schmidt et al., A Chip-Based Biosensor for the Functional Analysis of Single Ion Channels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Sep. 1, 2000;39(17):3137-3140. |
Shim et al., Stochastic sensing on a modular chip containing a single-ion channel. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2007;79(6):2207-13. Epub Feb. 9, 2007. |
Smith et al., Micropatterned fluid lipid bilayer arrays created using a continuous flow microspotter. Anal Chem. Nov. 1, 2008;80(21):7980-7. doi: 10.1021/ac800860u. Epub Oct. 8, 2008. |
Soni et al., Synchronous optical and electrical detection of biomolecules traversing through solid-state nanopores. Rev Sci Instrum. Jan. 2010;81(1):014301. doi: 10.1063/1.3277116. |
Stoddart et al., Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 12, 2009;106(19):7702-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901054106. Epub Apr. 20, 2009. |
Sun et al., Microfluidic static droplet arrays with tuneable gradients in material composition. Lab Chip. Dec. 7, 2011;11(23):3949-52. doi: 10.1039/c11c20709a. Epub Oct. 12, 2011. |
Suzuki et al., Highly reproducible method of planar lipid bilayer reconstitution in polymethyl methacrylate microfluidic chip. Langmuir. Feb. 14, 2006;22(4):1937-42. |
Suzuki et al., Planar lipid bilayer reconstitution with a micro-fluidic system. Lab Chip. Oct. 2004;4(5):502-5. Epub Sep. 2, 2004. |
Suzuki et al., Planar Lipid Membrane Array for Membrane Protein Chip. 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). 2004;272-275. |
Syms et al., Surface Tension-Powered Self-Assembly of Microstructures—The State of the Art. J Micro Systems. Aug. 2003;12(4):387-417. |
Thorsen et al., Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett. Apr. 30, 2001;86(18):4163-6. |
Urisu et al., Formation of high-resistance supported lipid bilayer on the surface of a silicon substrate with microelectrodes. Nanomedicine. Dec. 2005;1(4):317-22. |
Vidinha et al., Ion jelly: a tailor-made conducting material for smart electrochemical devices. Chem Commun (Camb). Nov. 30, 2008;(44):5842-4. doi: 10.1039/b811647d. Epub Oct. 3, 2008. |
Vulto et al., Microfluidic channel fabrication in dry film resist for production and prototyping of hybrid chips. Lab Chip. Feb. 2005;5(2):158-62. Epub Dec. 3, 2004. |
Wagterveld et al., Ultralow hysteresis superhydrophobic surfaces by excimer laser modification of SU-8. Langmuir. Dec. 19, 2006;22(26):10904-8. |
Zagnoni et al., Bilayer lipid membranes from falling droplets. Anal Bioanal Chem. Mar. 2009;393(6-7):1601-5. doi:10.1007/s00216-008-2588-5. Epub Jan. 19, 2009. |
Zagnoni et al., Controlled delivery of proteins into bilayer lipid membranes on chip. Lab Chip. Sep. 2007;7(9):1176-83. Epub Jun. 27, 2007. |
Zagnoni et al., Microfluidic array platform for simultaneous lipid bilayer membrane formation. Biosens Bioelectron. Jan. 1, 2009;24(5):1235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.07.022. Epub Jul. 23, 2008. |
Fraikin et al., A high-throughput label-free nanoparticle analyser. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(5):308-313. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.24. |
Gonzalez-Perez et al., Biomimetic triblock copolymer membrane arrays: a stable template for functional membrane proteins. Langmuir. 2009;25(18):10447-10450. doi:10.1021/1a902417m. |
Horn, Avoiding Evaporation. Ibidi. Application Note 12. Mar. 29, 2012, pp. 1-3. |
Ivanov et al., DNA tunneling detector embedded in a nanopore. Nano Lett. 2011;11(1):279-285. doi:10.1021/nl103873a. |
Third Party Observations for EP 17739663.7, mailed Sep. 23, 2021. 18 pages. |
Watanabe et al., Electrical recording of Nanopore membrane proteins in a microfluidic device. The Papers of Technical Meeting on Bio Micro Systems, IEE Japa. 2010; BMS-10(7-27):5-8. |
Yusko et al., Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls. Nat Nanotechnol. Apr. 2011;6(4): 253-260. Epub Feb. 20, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.12. Author Manuscript, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/665,011, filed Feb. 4, 2022, Brown et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/665,035, filed Feb. 4, 2022, Brown et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,031, filed Jan. 4, 2019, Sanghera et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/404,107, filed May 6, 2019, Hyde et al. |
PCT/GB2017/051991, Oct. 11, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190210021 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |