Microfluidic devices and methods for performing serum separation and blood cross-matching

Abstract
Microfluidic cartridges or devices for serum separation and blood cross-match analysis are provided. The devices may include a serum separation subcircuit alone or in combination with a solute mixing subcircuit. The serum separation subcircuit promotes on-cartridge clotting of a blood sample and manipulates the flow of the separated serum sample for subsequent cross-match analysis with a second blood sample, for example. The solute mixing subcircuit includes at least two intake channels, one for a whole blood sample from, for example, a blood donor and the other for the separated serum sample from, for example, a transfusion recipient. The solute mixing subcircuit further includes a serpentine mixing channel conjoined to a downstream channel. Under vacuum generated by a conjoined finger pump, the two input streams fill the serpentine mixing and downstream channels due to capillary action, enabling visualization of an agglutination reaction.
Description
BACKGROUND

Technical Field


This invention generally pertains to devices, apparatus, and methods for separation of serum from whole blood and potentiation of agglutination reactions in microfluidic devices. Agglutination reactions involving antigen:antibody reactions are useful in cross-matching for blood transfusion.


Description of the Related Art


Analysis of blood prior to transfusion or for clinical assessments relies on diagnostic devices, such as cross-matching or blood-typing devices, and blood chemistry monitors that measure metabolites such as glucose or cholesterol. Such devices must frequently use serum, the uncolored fluid portion of the blood containing analytes of interest to clinicians. Serum samples are separated from whole blood before analysis to remove red blood cells and clotting factors, which have the potential to interfere with cross-match agglutination reactions, colorimetric tests, as well as contribute to hematocrit-dependent variations amongst samples. Therefore, prior to testing, a preprocessing operation is required in which the blood sample is separated into a serum and a clot containing red blood cells.


In the conventional method of serum separation, a whole blood sample is placed in a blood collection tube, allowed to clot, and subjected to centrifugal separation, which enables collection of the serum fraction. However, there has been a dramatic transition in diagnostic analysis from the macroscale to the microscale, with specimen volume requirements decreasing from milliliters to microliters, thereby reducing assay times from hours to minutes. The conventional method of serum separation, requiring sample centrifugation, is obviously not amenable to microscale adaptation. As the engineering of microfluidic diagnostic devices continues to be the focus of competitive research, there is a neglected need for improvements in the preparation of samples for analysis. In adapting these devices for clinical diagnosis, special features are needed to provide serum separated from red blood cells and clotting factors.


Administration of blood in the form of packed erythrocytes or whole blood is often critical in the treatment of trauma, hypovolemic shock, anemia and clotting disorders. Blood transfusion typically requires characterization of the donor blood so as to match the ABO blood type of the donor and recipient, or, more generally, requires a cross-match analysis. This is done to avoid a hemolytic transfusion reaction in which red cells having a major incompatibility antigen are inadvertently administered to a recipient having an antibody to that antigen, and also to avoid the minor side reaction in which a red cell antigen in the recipient's blood is attacked by antibodies in the plasma of the donor. Serious consequences such as kidney failure or splenic rupture can result from a transfusion of mismatched blood.


Currently, medical technicians in the field do not have access to a simple and accurate means of evaluating a donor and recipient pair for possible transfusion reactions during emergency medical treatment, for example, during military operations. Tube agglutination assays are currently used prior to blood transfusion, however these assays are cumbersome and involve erythrocyte preparation and long incubation times. These assays may not always lead to consistent results depending upon the experience of the technician. Additionally, some technicians do not have access to a laboratory qualified to perform agglutination assays. Therefore, there is a strong need in the art for a blood cross-matching device that is quick and simple to use and thus amenable for evaluation of donor and recipient transfusion compatibility during emergency medical care. The present invention fulfills these needs and provides further related advantages.


BRIEF SUMMARY

In one aspect, the present invention provides a microfluidic device having utility in any number of applications, such as for separating a serum fraction from a whole blood sample. In one embodiment, the microfluidic device includes: a) a microfluidic channel having a first end and a second end; b) a sample inlet fluidly connected to the first end of the microfluidic channel configured for receiving a blood sample; and c) a composite membrane interposed between the sample inlet and the first end of the microfluidic channel, wherein the composite membrane is capable of activating blood coagulation and removing selected particles from the blood; and d) an optional on-device pump fluidly connected to the second end of the microfluidic channel. In certain embodiments the optional on-device pump is present. In another embodiment, the composite membrane of the microfluidic device includes at least two membranes. In another embodiment, the composite membrane includes a glass fiber filter. In another embodiment, the composite membrane includes a glass fiber filter and a porous membrane. In another embodiment, the composite membrane also includes an activator of blood coagulation.


In another aspect, the present invention provides microfluidic cartridges and devices which may be used for a number of different assays, including for cross-match assessment of a blood donor and a blood recipient. In one embodiment, the microfluidic cartridge or device includes: a) a fluid separation subcircuit that includes: i) a microfluidic channel having a first end and a second end; ii) a sample inlet fluidly connected to the first end of the microfluidic channel configured for receiving a blood sample; iii) a composite membrane interposed between the sample inlet and the first end of the microfluidic channel, wherein the composite membrane is capable of activating blood coagulation and removing selected particles from the blood; and iv) an optional on-device pump fluidly connected to the second end of the microfluidic channel; and b) a solute mixing subcircuit that includes: i) a serpentine mixing channel, said mixing channel having a first end and a second end and having a critical length for enabling solute mixture by diffusion; ii) a first and second intake channel fluidly joined to said first end of said mixing channel at a staging union; said first intake channel for conveying a first fluid and said second channel for conveying a second fluid; wherein said staging union is configured with a micro-passive valve for simultaneously releasing said first and second fluids into said mixing channel; iii) a downstream channel fluidly joined to the second end of said mixing channel, wherein the downstream channel has a width greater than the width of the mixing channel; iv) a pump for controlledly initiating fluid flow across said micro-passive valve, wherein said pump is fluidly connected to said downstream channel, and initiates flow by a suction stroke; and v) a vent terminating said downstream channel. In certain embodiments the optional on-device pump is present. In another embodiment, the microfluidic cartridge further includes a third intake channel fluidly joined to the first end of the mixing channel at the staging union; the third intake channel for conveying a third fluid to said staging area. In yet another embodiment of the microfluidic cartridge, the fluid separation subcircuit and solute mixing subcircuits are fluidly connected. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite membrane includes at least two membranes. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite membrane includes a glass filter. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite membrane includes a glass filter and a porous membrane. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite membrane includes an activator of blood coagulation.


Methods for using the microfluidic devices for separation of serum from blood samples and for cross-matching donor and recipient samples are also provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the operation of a first embodiment of a microfluidic device in accordance with aspects of the present invention.



FIGS. 2A-B are cross-sectional views illustrating the operation of a second and third embodiment of a microfluidic device in accordance with aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view illustrating the operation of a fourth embodiment of a microfluidic device in accordance with aspects of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of representative microfluidic assay circuits of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a schematic of a second embodiment of the microfluidic assay circuits of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows results of cross-match reactions between different donors and recipients using a microfluidic device of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect, the present invention provides a microfluidic device configured to prepare a serum sample for analysis and methods for use of the same. The device is capable of promoting blood coagulation and manipulating the flow of the fluid sample in order to prepare a separated serum sample. The device employs a composite membrane that is capable of providing a matrix to hold a blood sample in place while promoting coagulation. Various embodiments of the device further utilize a plurality of microfluidic channels, inlets, valves, pumps, and other elements arranged in various configurations.


In another aspect, the present invention provides microfluidic cartridges and devices configured to conduct cross-match assessments of blood samples from a donor and a recipient and methods for use of the same. Whole blood from the intended recipient is initially applied to a fluid subcircuit that comprises a composite filter designed to promote on-cartridge coagulation and particle separation, thereby providing an isolated serum sample for cross-match assessment. Packed red cells or whole blood from a donor unit and the separated serum from the intended recipient are added to separate intake channels of the mixing subcircuit of the microfluidic cartridge of the present invention. The donor and recipient samples are contacted in a side-by-side diffusion interface created in a serpentine channel of the mixing subcircuit. Diffusion of solutes between samples in the mixing channel leads to immune binding and visible agglutination reactions if the donor and recipient blood types are not compatible. A downstream flow control channel, with a dimension greater than that of the serpentine mixing channel, modulates and prolongs the liquid flow rate, thereby potentiating immune binding and agglutination reactions. In reactions run for up to ten minutes, agglutination due to incompatibility between blood donor and recipient was easily visually detectable using the microfluidic cartridges of the present invention. If no agglutination was observed, then the blood donor and the recipient are compatible.


1. Definitions

These definitions are provided as an aid in interpreting the claims and specification herein. Where works are cited by reference, and definitions contained therein are inconsistent with those supplied here, the definition used therein shall apply only to the work cited and not to this disclosure.


Microfluidic cartridge: a “device”, “card”, or “chip” with internal fluid-handling mesostructures by convention having at least one dimension less than 500 μm. These fluidic structures may include microfluidic channels, chambers, valves, vents, vias, pumps, inlets, nipples, and detection means, for example.


Microfluidic channel: as used here, is an enclosed conduit or passage for a fluid having a z-dimension of less than 500 μm, more preferably less than or about 250 μm, and most preferably about or less than 100 μm (about 4 mils), and a cross-sectional area that is broader than deep. The most narrow dimension, also termed the “critical dimension”, of a channel has the most profound effect on flow, Reynolds Number, pressure drop, and in the devices described here, the most narrow dimension is typically the z-dimension or diameter.


Microfluidic channels with generally rectangular cross-sections are characterized by x-, y- and z-dimensions. The x-dimension is taken as the length “L” of the channel along the axis of flow, the y-dimension as the width and the z-dimension as the depth. When formed by injection molding, the channel roof and walls are typically joined by a radius. Some microfluidic channels have a circular cross-section and are characterized by a diameter. Other shapes are also possible.


It will be recognized that the words “top”, “bottom”, “upper”, “lower”, “side”, “roof”, “floor”, “base” and “horizontal” as used here are relative terms and do not necessarily describe the orientation of the device or device components in relation to the plane of the earth's surface unless explicitly stated to be so. The use of the devices flat on the surface of a table is not intended to be limiting and the z-axis is generally chosen to be perpendicular to the major plane of the device body only as a matter of convenience in explanation and manufacture.


Finger (Bellows) Pump: is a device formed as a cavity, often cylindrical in shape, covered by a flexible, distensible diaphragm, and with an upstream microfluidic channel inlet and a downstream outlet fluidly connected to the cavity. In operation, by placing a vent as the outlet, the diaphragm can be pressed down without generating a differential pressure in the cavity, but by then covering the vent and releasing the elastic diaphragm, a suction pressure pulse is generated that finds use in drawing fluid through the inlet microfluidic channel. In the devices of the present invention, a suction pulse of this kind serves to initiate the assay by initiating fluid flow through a capillary stop; the suction pulse, however, is not required or desired for sustaining fluid flow, which is driven by passive flow capillarity once the upstream microfluidic channel is wetted.


Surfactants: are amphiphilic molecules that lower the surface and interfacial tensions of a liquid by collecting at the interface, allowing easier spreading on a solid surface and reducing the contact angle. Anionic, cationic, zwitterionic, nonionic, and fluorophilic surfactants are contemplated. Anionic surfactants include sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (e.g., Aerosol OT-75) marketed by CYTEC Industries. Non-ionic surfactants include polysorbates (e.g., polysorbate 80), polyoxyethylene lauryl ether, n-lauryl-ß-D-maltopyranoside (LM), cetyl ether, stearyl ether, and nonylphenyl ether, Tween® 80, Triton® X-100, and other surfactants. As nonionic surfactants, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether, polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene condensate, acyl polyoxyethylene sorbitan ester, alkyl polyoxyethylene ether, n-dodecyl-ß-D-maltoside, sucrose monolaurate, polyoxyethylene lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene alkylene phenyl ether, polyoxyethylene alkylene tribenzyl phenyl ether, polyoxyethylene glycol p-t-octyl phenyl ether, polyoxyethylene higher alcohol ether, polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid ester, sorbitan fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene sorbitol fatty acid ester, polyoxyethylene alkylamine, glycerol fatty acid ester, n-octyl-ß-D-thioglycoside, cetyl ether (C16), lauryl ether (C12), oleyl ether, behenyl ether (C20), polyoxyethylene monolaurate and the like are used. Commercially available nonionic surfactants of this type include Igepal® CO-610 marketed by the GAF Corporation; and Triton® CF-12, X-45, X-114, X-100 and X-102, all marketed by the Dow Chemical Company; Tergitol®15-S-9 marketed by the Union Carbide Corporation; PLURAFAC® RA-40 marketed by BASF Corp; Neodol® 23-6.5 marketed by the Shell Chemical Company and Kyro EOB marketed by the Procter & Gamble Company. Amphoteric or zwitterionic surfactants are also useful in providing detergency, emulsification, wetting and conditioning properties. Representative amphoteric surfactants include fatty acid amides of amino acids (such as Amisoft® LS-11 and HS-21 made by Ajinomoto), N-coco-3-aminopropionic acid and acid salts, N-tallow-3-iminodiproprionate salts. As well as N-lauryl-3-iminodiproprionate disodium salt, N-carboxymethyl-N-cocoalkyl-N-dimethylammonium hydroxide, N-carboxymethyl-N-dimethyl-N-(9-octadecenyl)ammonium hydroxide, (1-carboxyheptadecyl)-trimethylammonium hydroxide, (1-carboxyundecyl) trimethylammonium hydroxide, N-cocoamidoethyl-N-hydroxyethylglycine sodium salt, N-hydroxyethyl-N-stearamidoglycine sodium salt, N-hydroxyethyl-N-lauramido-ß-alanine sodium salt, N-cocoamido-N-hydroxyethyl-ß-alanine sodium salt, as well as mixed alicyclic amines, and their ethoxylated and sulfated sodium salts, 2-alkyl-1-carboxymethyl-1-hydroxyethyl-2-imidazolinium hydroxide sodium salt or free acid wherein the alkyl group may be nonyl, undecyl, or heptadecyl. Also useful are 1,1-bis(carboxymethyl)-2-undecyl-2-imidazolinium hydroxide disodium salt and oleic acid-ethylenediamine condensate, propoxylated and sulfated sodium salt. Amine oxide amphoteric surfactants are also useful. This list is by no means exclusive or limiting.


Surfactants can be added to a reagent to modify the surface tension of the reagent or added to a solid substrate to modify the interfacial tension of the substrate. During molding of a plastic article with a surfactant additive, a sufficient number of surfactant molecules migrate to the surface of the substrate, a process called “blooming”, so as to yield a low contact angle surface. The process is described in US Patent Application 2008/0145280 to Bookbinder, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


Surfactants useful as admixtures with plastics to provide hydrophilic surface properties include polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, nonylphenol ethyoxylate and polyalkylenyeneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, sodium or ammonium salts of nonyl phenol ethoxyl sulfonic acid, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate and sodium dioctylsulfo succinate, and ionic salts of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl propanesulfonic acid, N-vinyl caprolactam, caprolactone acrylate, N-vinyl pyrrolidone, and sulfate and acrylic monomers, for example.


“Low HLB (hydrophilic-lipophilic balance) wetting agents” are a subclass of surfactants preferred in the present invention for coating plastic surfaces to decrease contact angle and wet-out time. A low HLB wetting agent of the invention can be an anionic, a cationic, a zwitterionic or a non-ionic wetting agent, the latter being preferred. HLB numbers less than or equal to 6 are preferred; wetting agents of this type, when first dried to a surface, are essentially not solubilized when exposed to an aqueous reagent, but can be applied with alcohols, for example. The wetting agent of the invention can also be a mixture of two or more wetting agents. Candidates include, C12-C20 fatty acid esters of sucrose or xylose, glycerides of sucrose, fatty acid esters of polyoxyethylene, esters of fatty alcohols and polyoxyethylene, esters of sorbitan, esters of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, alcohol-polyglycide esters, and glyceride-polyglycides, also including for example Pluronic® L121, Pluronic® L122, PEO(2) cetyl ether (Brij® 52), PEO(2) stearyl ether (Brij® 72), Sorbitol mono-oleate (Span.® 20), Sorbitol tristearate (Span® 65), PEO(200) di-oleate (Maypeg® 200) sorbitol mono-stearate, glycerol mono-stearate, sucrose esters, alkyl naphthalene sodium sulfonate (Alkanol® B), N-octadecyl-disodium sulfosuccinamate (Aerosol® 18), polyoxyalkylene fatty ester (Nonisol® 250), dimethyl octynediol (Surfynol® 102), dimethyl hexynediol and the like.


Capillary pressure or “capillary action” describes a pressure or a movement of a liquid under that pressure respectively, also termed “capillarity”, and refers to the tendency of a liquid in a microfluidic channel to advance or recede in a channel so as to minimize the overall surface free energy of the liquid/channel/vapor system. For example, a liquid with a low surface tension will advance to “wet out” a channel made from a material with a high surface energy such as glass. When injected in a microfluidic channel, liquids displaying a concave meniscus will tend to advance in the channel, and liquids displaying a convex meniscus will tend to recede. Thus capillarity is a vectored force resulting in wetting and passive flow of an aqueous liquid in a hydrophilic microfluidic channel.


“Wetout” time: refers to a measurement of the time required for a liquid to advance a standardized length in a microfluidic channel of a given geometry and surface characteristics (generally in mm/s). “Wetout” rate refers to an instantaneous rate of advance of a liquid front in a microfluidic channel in units of volume per unit time (μL/μsec) and can be modulated by surface treatments and by controlling channel geometry. Passive flow driven by downstream wetout can be used to control upstream flow velocity.


Herein, where a “means for a function” is claimed, it should be understood that the scope of the invention is not limited to the mode or modes illustrated in the drawings alone, but also encompasses all means for performing the function that are described in this specification and any equivalent means.


Means for Fabrication: Fabrication methods include laser stenciling, lamination, embossing, stamping, injection molding, masking, etching, photocatalyzed stereolithography, soft lithography, and so forth, or any combination of the above. Each cartridge can be formed of a pair of members or layers glued or fused together, or of a plurality of layers glued or fused together. The term “layer” refers to any of one or more generally planar solid substrate members or glue layers comprising a cartridge; “layers” also includes individual sheets, roll stock, and any molded body members formed as generally planar members. Layers may be joined with pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) or thermal adhesive. Alternatively, they may be fused under pressure with heat, solvent, or by ultrasonic welding. The number of layers in the device will be dependent on the required functionalities and the fabrication process is chosen.


Plastic is a preferred material for building microfluidic devices of the present invention. Plastics which may be used include olefins, cyclic polyolefins, cyclic olefin copolymers, polyesters, polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, polystyrenes, polycarbonates, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, polyether sulfone, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate, polyamides, polyimides, polyacrylate, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polytetrafluoroethylenes, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polysilane, cellulose triacetate, thermoplastics in general, and so forth. Composites and copolymers are also frequently used. The knowledge to select plastics or other solid substrates and conventional adhesives is widely known in related arts.


“Conventional” is a term designating that which is known in the prior art to which this invention relates.


“About” and “generally” are broadening expressions of inexactitude, describing a condition of being “more or less”, “approximately”, or “almost” in the sense of “just about”, where variation would be insignificant, obvious, or of equivalent utility or function, and further indicating the existence of obvious minor exceptions to a norm, rule or limit. For example, in various embodiments the foregoing terms refer to a quantity within 20%, 10%, 5%, 1% or 0.1% of the value which follows the term.


Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense—that is as “including, but not limited to”.


2. Features and Methods of Use for Microfluidic Cartridges and Devices for Serum Separation

Exemplary embodiments of the invention can be better understood in reference to the attached figures. However, it is to be understood that the illustrated embodiments do not limit the scope of the invention and certain non-illustrated embodiments are also included.



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the device 110 illustrating the operation of a first embodiment of the invention. As shown in FIG. 1, a microfluidic device 110 comprises a microfluidic channel 120 having a first end 122 and a second end 124. As illustrated, device 110 is in the form of a cartridge, however, the form of device 110 is not essential to the present invention and persons of ordinary skill in the art can readily select a suitable form for a given application. The microfluidic devices of the present invention, such as device 110, may be constructed from a material, such as plastic, mylar or latex, using a method such as injection molding or lamination.


As further shown in FIG. 1, device 110 comprises a sample inlet 130 fluidly connected to first end 122 of microfluidic channel 120 for receiving a liquid sample and a composite membrane 140 interposed between sample inlet 130 and first end 122 of microfluidic channel 120. As used herein, the term “membrane” refers to any planar material with a Z-dimension, including filters, which are porous membranes. Composite membrane 140 is capable of providing a matrix to hold a blood sample in place and, importantly, promoting coagulation of the blood sample. Composite membrane 140 is also capable of selectively retaining the clotted components of the blood sample and other selected particles, such as white blood cells, red blood cells, polymeric beads, such as polystyrene or latex beads with sizes from 1-100 μm, and bacteria cells, such as E. coli, from the liquid sample. Composite membrane 140 may comprise a plurality of filters or membranes or a single filter or membrane comprising a plurality of different fibers types. An optional finger pump 150 having a vent hole 152 is fluidly connected to the second end 124 of microfluidic channel 120.


During operation, a liquid blood sample is placed into sample inlet 130 (as shown in FIG. 1) whereupon the liquid blood is absorbed by membrane 140, which promotes the coagulation of the blood sample. Finger pump 150 is depressed, either manually by a user or mechanically by an external device, vent hole 152 is substantially sealed, such as by covering vent hole 152, and finger pump 150 is subsequently released. During depression of finger pump 150, vent hole 152 remains uncovered so that air in finger pump 150 may be expelled through vent hole 152. Upon release of finger pump 150, a negative fluid pressure is created in microfluidic channel 120 and a liquid serum sample is drawn through membrane 140 into, and through, microfluidic channel 120 into the sample collection well 170. In contrast, the clotted constituents as well as particles of the sample are retained by composite membrane 140 and do no enter sample collection well 170. In various embodiments, the negative pressure is provided by means other than the finger pump (e.g., an associated pneumatic instrument or other means) or the fluid moves under force of gravity.



FIGS. 2A-B depict cross-sectional views of alternative embodiments of composite membrane 140. As shown in FIG. 2A, the composite membrane may comprise two membranes, membranes 142 and 144. Membranes 142 and 144 may comprise the same or different materials. In one embodiment, the membrane 142 comprises a material that activates blood coagulation, such as glass fibers. In one embodiment, the second membrane 144 may be selected to provide particle-separation functions. In this embodiment, membrane 144 may comprise a filter with a pore size of around 1-2 μm in order to selectively remove red blood cells and white blood cells from the liquid sample. Such membranes may include, but are not limited, to asymmetric and non-asymmetric membranes comprising polysulfone (manufactured by PALL, Inc.). The two or more membranes may be stacked one on top of the other in device 110.


In operation, a blood sample is placed in sample inlet 130. When a drop of whole blood is applied to the device 110, the blood sample is drawn into membrane 142, which causes the blood to clot. Under negative pressure, the clotted sample is further drawn into second membrane 144, which retains the clotted and particulate matter while the liquid serum sample passes through the membrane into voids 182 and 184. The volume of voids 182 and 184 is sufficiently small such that the separated serum sample moves by capillary flow into the first end 122 of the microfluidic channel.


An alternative embodiment of the composite filter is shown in FIG. 2B. As depicted, composite filter 146 comprises a single membrane comprising a plurality of different fiber types, at least one of which promotes the coagulation of unclotted blood. Fibers selected for the composite filter medium include, but are not limited to, cotton linter fibers, glass microfibers, polyester (PET) staple fibers, and lower melting polyester binder fibers. Polyester staple fibers of about 1.5 denier (wherein “denier” is a term of art that refers to a unit that describes the thickness and length of a fiber) and about 0.25-in length may be the backbone of the filter to provide the gross structure of the membrane. Optionally, cotton linter fibers may be used to provide a readily wettable capillary network to passively draw the blood through the filter. Glass microfibers of about 0.40 μm mean fiber diameter may produce the fine pore structure needed for cell and particle separation. Fibers may be joined by woven or nonwoven means. Nonwoven filters may be constructed by wetlaid, spunbonded, or meltblown means. To increase strength, polyester binder fibers may optionally be added to the composite membrane.


As an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the composite membranes of FIGS. 2A-B may further contain one or more accelerators of blood coagulation. Blood coagulation activators known in the art include, but are not limited to, thrombin, snake venoms, such as Russells viper venom, platelet activating factor (PAF or ß-Acetyl-y-O-alkyl-L-∂-phosphatidylcholine), collagen, materials bearing multiple negative charges on their surfaces, such as borosilicate flakes or hallow beads, and aluminum-silicate mineral clays, such as kaolin.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the device 110 illustrating the operation of one embodiment of the invention. Sample collection well 170 may be sealed with adhesive membrane 190. During operation, device 110 is supplied with sample collection well 170 sealed from the environment by adhesive membrane 190. In one embodiment of the present invention, adhesive membrane 190 is a pressure sensitive, removable tape. A liquid blood sample is placed into sample inlet 130 whereupon the liquid blood is absorbed by filter 140, which promotes the coagulation of the blood sample. Finger pump 150 is depressed, either manually by a user or mechanically by an external device, vent hole 152 is substantially sealed, such as by covering vent hole 152, and finger pump 150 is then released. During depression of finger pump 150, vent hole 152 remains uncovered so that air in finger pump 150 may be expelled through vent hole 152. Upon release of finger pump 150, a negative fluid pressure is created in microfluidic channel 120 and a liquid serum sample is drawn through membrane 140 into, and through, microfluidic channel 120 into the sample collection well 170. Adhesive membrane 190 is removed from device 110 by user manipulation of tab 195 to enable removal of a separated serum sample for further analysis. As noted above, the finger pump is not a required feature of all embodiments and fluid movement may be initiated and/or maintained by other means.


Methods for separation of serum from whole blood samples by use of the microfluidic devices are also provided. For example, in some embodiments, such methods comprise introducing the blood sample into the sample inlet of any of the disclosed microfluidic devices and contacting the blood sample with the composite membrane therein. The separated serum may then be isolated by the user and employed in further analyses, for example cross-matching analyses by contacting the isolated serum with a blood sample (e.g., a recipient blood sample) and observing the presence or absence of an agglutination reaction.


3. Features and Methods of Use for Microfluidic Cartridges and Devices for Blood Cross-Match Analysis

Embodiments of the microfluidic devices of the present invention are planar, disposable cartridges that are generally credit card-sized. Most on-cartridge fluid handling and structural elements have internal dimensions ranging in size from less than 100 μm to a few mm in size and are designed to handle fluid volumes from a few microliters to a milliliter or two.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a microfluidic device 100 illustrating the operation of another embodiment of the invention. As illustrated, device 100 is in the form of a cartridge, however, the form of device 100 is not essential to the present invention and persons of ordinary skill in the art can readily select a suitable form for a given application. The microfluidic devices of the present invention, such as device 100, may be constructed from a material, such as transparent plastic, mylar or latex, using a method such as injection molding or lamination.


As shown in FIG. 4, the microfluidic device 100 comprises a fluid subcircuit 110 for serum separation. Subcircuit 110 comprises a microfluidic channel 120 having a first end 122 and a second end 124. Fluid subcircuit 110 further comprises a sample inlet 130 fluidly connected to first end 122 of microfluidic channel 120 for receiving a liquid sample and a composite membrane 140 interposed between sample inlet 130 and first end 122 of microfluidic channel 120. As used herein, the term “membrane” refers to any planar material with a Z-dimension, including filters, which are porous membranes. Composite membrane 140 is capable of providing a matrix to hold a blood sample in place and, importantly, promoting coagulation of the blood sample. Composite membrane 140 is also capable of selectively retaining the clotted components of the blood sample and other selected particles, such as white blood cells, red blood cells, polymeric beads, such as polystyrene or latex beads with sizes from 1-100 μm, and bacteria cells, such as E. coli, from the liquid sample. Composite membrane 140 may be comprised of a plurality of filters or membranes or a single filter or membrane comprised of a plurality of different fibers types. A finger pump 150 having a vent hole 152 is fluidly connected to the second end 124 of microfluidic channel 120. Although illustrated with a finger pump, the finger pump is not a required feature of all embodiments and fluid movement may be initiated and/or maintained by other means.


During operation, a liquid blood sample is placed into sample inlet 130 (as shown in FIG. 4) whereupon the liquid blood is absorbed by membrane 140, which promotes the coagulation of the blood sample. Finger pump 150 is depressed, either manually by a user or mechanically by an external device, vent hole 152 is substantially sealed, such as by covering vent hole 152, and finger pump 150 is subsequently released. During depression of finger pump 150, vent hole 152 remains uncovered so that air in finger pump 150 may be expelled through vent hold 152. Upon release of finger pump 150, a negative air pressure is created in microfluidic channel 120 and a liquid serum sample is drawn through membrane 140 into, and through, microfluidic channel 120 into the sample collection well 170. In contrast, the clotted constituents of the sample are retained by composite membrane 140 and do no enter sample collection well 170. Separated serum is to be removed manually by the user for further cross-match analysis as described below.


The cartridge of body member 100 further comprises a mixing subcircuit for the mixing of solutes between two or more liquid samples. As exemplified by the microfluidic device of FIG. 4, three intake channels 212, 214, and 216, generally with inlet wells 222, 224, and 226, are joined at a staging union 230. A liquid sample is introduced into a first inlet well and another sample or reagent liquid is introduced into a second inlet well. Optionally, a third liquid sample is introduced into a third well. One sample or reagent will include a particulate suspension of red blood cells. A second sample or reagent will include separated serum. A third, optional, sample or reagent may include a diluent, as described in greater detail below.


The microfluidic device includes micro-passive valves interposed between the intake channels 212, 214, and 216 and the staging union 230 and are configured to form a dual fluid stop. The fluid stops illustrate the general principal that an aqueous liquid will not cross a surface energy barrier without an additional force. Thus a meniscus forms where the channel geometry expands sharply and or a hydrophobic barrier surface is formed. When energy is provided, for example as a suction pulse applied downstream by finger pump 260 or other means to start the assay, all fluids will simultaneously cross the micro-passive valves and enter the common serpentine mixing channel 240. Fluids flow into serpentine mixing channel 240 by capillary action and solutes in the fluids mix together by diffusion as the liquids pass through the serpentine mixing channel. The serpentine turns of the mixing channel increase the overall length of the mixing channel, and thus the distance travelled by the liquids. Importantly, increasing the time that the liquids reside in the mixing channel through the serpentine configuration also increases the time for solutes in the liquid streams to mix by diffusion. When the particulate suspension of red blood cells is contacted with serum in the second sample, antibodies present in the second sample will cause an agglutination reaction to occur if there is no cross-match between the two samples, demonstrating they are not compatible for blood transfusion. In contrast, no agglutination reaction occurs if the first and second samples are compatible for blood transfusion. Agglutination reactions are observed by the user by the appearance of dynamically moving particle aggregates or “clumps” in the serpentine mixer 240 and the downstream channel 250 of the microfluidic device. The length of the serpentine channel is selected such that the time the flowing liquids reside in the serpentine channel is sufficient for the liquids to mix and an agglutination reaction to occur if there is no cross-match. A length which allows for sufficient mixing to enable an agglutination reaction is referred to as the “critical length.”


The bottom surfaces of the inlet wells 222, 224, 226, intake channels 212, 214, 216, serpentine mixer 240, and tailpipe 250 may be coated with a surfactant to make the surfaces hydrophilic and promote the capillary flow of liquid sample through the microfluidic circuit. Agglutination reactions may be observed by the user through visual detection of moving particle aggregates or “clumps” dynamically passing through the serpentine mixer 240 and into the downstream channel 250. The downstream channel is configured such that it has a greater width than the width of the mixing channel. Due to the greater width of the downstream channel which increases the cross-sectional volume of the channel thereby reduces the velocity of the liquid front, however the flow rate of the liquid streams in the mixing channel remain the same, thereby increasing the amount of sample to be mixed in the channel.


In an alternative embodiment of the microfluidic devices of the present invention cartridge body member 100, has two intake channels 212 and 216, generally with inlet wells 222 and 226, joined at a staging union 230. A liquid sample containing a particulate suspension of red blood cells is introduced into channel 212; a second liquid sample containing separated serum is introduced into channel 216. In this embodiment of the invention, dilution of the particulate blood sample may be performed off-cartridge, prior to loading of the blood sample into inlet well 222 of the microfluidic device of FIG. 4. A red blood cell diluent may be included to achieve any of the following advantages: reduction of the concentration of agglutinins in the donor blood that may participate in an auto-immune reaction with the donor red bloods cells and induce hemolysis or agglutination as a side-reaction; reduction of the Zeta potential (negative surface charge) on the donor red blood cells, which inhibits cellular aggregation; reduction in the density of red blood cells in the detection window, such that aggregates of cells are more easily viewed; or prevention of complement-mediated steric hindrance of antibody-antigen binding that might contribute to a false negative reaction (e.g., a cross-match). Exemplary diluents include but are not limited to isotonic saline solutions that may or may not include EDTA to prevent clotting of donor blood prior to cross-match analysis. When the particulate blood sample and diluent are contacted with serum in the second sample, antibodies present in the second sample will cause an agglutination reaction to occur if there is no cross-match between the red blood cell and serum samples, indicating and they are not compatible for a blood transfusion. In contrast, no agglutination reaction will occur if the particulate and serum samples are compatible for a blood transfusion. Agglutination reactions are observed by the user by the appearance of dynamically moving particle aggregates or “clumps” in the serpentine mixer 240 and the downstream channel 250.


Another alternative embodiment of the microfluidic devices of the present invention is shown in FIG. 5. In this embodiment, microfluidic device 105 comprises a fluid subcircuit 115 for serum separation that is fluidly connected to intake channel 216. Serum separation is performed as described above; however, in this embodiment of the invention, the serum collection chamber 175 functions as sample inlet well 226 of the embodiment of FIG. 4. The principles of operating microfluidic device 105 of this embodiment of the invention are similar to those of microfluidic device 100, except that operation of microfluidic device 105 does not require that the user manually apply a serum sample to a sample inlet well.


Methods for use of any of the foregoing microfluidic devices in cross-matching of two different blood samples, such as cross match of a donor blood sample and a recipient blood sample, are also provided. For example, the methods may be for performing a cross match of a donor blood sample and a recipient blood sample. In one of these embodiments, the method comprises:


a) contacting the donor blood sample with the composite membrane of any of the foregoing microfluidic devices;


b) isolating serum from the donor blood sample;


c) contacting the isolated serum with the recipient blood sample; and


d) observing the presence or absence of an agglutination reaction.


Advantageously, certain embodiments of the methods are performed using microfluidic devices in which a fluid subcircuit for serum separation is fluidly connected to a sample inlet and mixing channel (e.g., as described with respect to FIG. 5). In embodiments of these methods, serum separation is performed, and the separated serum is contacted with a whole blood sample on the same microfluidic device. For example, in some embodiments the cross matching methods comprise:


a) introducing a donor blood sample into a serum separation subcircuit of a microfluidic device having fluidly connected serum separation subcircuits and solute mixing subcircuits (e.g., as described above in reference to FIG. 5) and contacting the donor blood sample with a composite membrane in the serum separation subcircuit to separate donor serum from the donor blood sample;


b) contacting the donor serum with a recipient blood sample in a mixing channel of the solute mixing subcircuit; and


c) observing the presence or absence of an agglutination reaction.


EXAMPLES
Example 1: Assessment of Glass Fiber Filters in Promoting Blood Coagulation

This example demonstrates that glass fiber filters promote blood coagulation on a microfluidic device.


Various borosilicate glass fiber filters as set forth in Table 1 were stacked with the Pall Vivid GR membrane and laminated into “cartridges” (i.e., into a microfluidic device) using standard construction methods known in the art. For testing, 100 μL of fresh, whole blood was applied to the filter and allowed to clot for up to 15 minutes. Liquid sample was pulled by vacuum into a collection chamber. Performance of the filters was evaluated based on the volume of serum obtained in one minute and on the color of the serum. As shown in Table I, several of the glass fiber filters tested enabled on-card serum separation. Pink serum indicates that some degree of hemolysis has occurred. These results indicate that serum separation can, surprisingly, be achieved on-card (i.e., within a microfluidic device) by incorporation of a glass fiber filter into the design of the device. Interestingly, not all glass fiber filters displayed identical properties in this assessment. The function of the Porex glass fiber filter was superior to the others in that it did not promote hemolysis, but rather generated a clear serum sample. Pore size or filter thickness of the glass fiber filters tested varied, but no correlation was observed with performance.


Thus, this unique composite filter design, which introduces a borosilicate glass fiber filter, displays superior functionality over prior art filtering devices. While the prior art blood filters are limited to performing particle separation, the composite filters of the present invention can further promote blood coagulation, thereby removing inhibitory clotting factors and providing serum for further diagnostic analysis.









TABLE 1







Borosilicate glass fiber filters tested in serum separation












Brand

Pores
Thickness
Volume



(Glass fiber)
Grade
(microns)
(microns)
(μL)
Color





Porex
D
2.7
640
20
Clear


Pall
A/D
3.1
580-740
20
Pink


Whatman
GF/D
2.7
675
20
Pink


Macherey
MN 85/90 BF
0.5
400
20
Pink


Nagel









Example 2: Design of a Microfluidic Subcircuit for Serum Separation

This example demonstrates serum separation by a microfluidic device incorporating a glass fiber, composite filter.


A microfluidic subcircuit with a collection chamber and a port was designed to separate serum from a whole blood sample. Fresh, whole finger-stick collected blood (approximately 200 μL) was applied to a composite filter as described above and allowed to clot. In operation, the user's index finger compresses a finger pump, while a second finger covers the vent holes. The vacuum generated when the index finger is removed pulls the sample through the filters into the collection chamber. The filtered sample was collected using a mechanical pipettor with a disposable tip. The recovered material was characterized as serum by measurement of the residual fibrinogen content. Plasma contains fibrinogen, while serum is depleted of this protein due to activation of the clotting cascade, during which fibrinogen is converted into insoluble fibrin to create the blood clot. The blood clot is retained in the composite filter, while the liquid serum passes through the filter and into the collection chamber.


A fibrinogen ELISA kit (manufactured by Alpco Diagnostics, Salem, N.H.) was used to measure fibrinogen content of the samples. Samples recovered from the serum separation subcircuit were compared to serum generated by the conventional protocol of blood clotting and centrifugation in vacucontainers. Plasma collected in vacutainers containing sodium citrate as an anticoagulant was also assayed. Four different plasma samples were found to contain from 2.9 to 4.2 mg/mL fibrinogen, while serum samples generated by centrifugation were found to be mostly depleted of fibrinogen, containing from 0 to 300 ng/mL fibrinogen (approximately 10,000 fold less than plasma). Surprisingly, as shown in FIG. 6, the amount of fibrinogen detected in each of the eleven samples of material obtained from the serum separation subcircuit was also negligible (from 0 to 3000 ng/mL fibrinogen). These results demonstrate the successful design of a serum separation subcircuit into a microfluidic device through use of a glass fiber, composite filter. The microfluidic devices disclosed herein offer significant advantages over conventional serum separation protocols, which require large, heavy, and costly laboratory equipment to practice.


The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, including but not limited to U.S. Patent Application Nos. 61/820,576; 61/820,585 and 61/820,579; each filed May 7, 2013, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A microfluidic device comprising: a) a fluid separation subcircuit comprising: i) a microfluidic channel having a first end and a second end;ii) a sample inlet fluidly connected to the first end of the microfluidic channel configured for receiving a blood sample;iii) a composite membrane interposed between the sample inlet and the first end of the microfluidic channel, wherein the composite membrane is capable of activating blood coagulation and removing selected particles from the blood, wherein the composite membrane comprises a glass fiber filter; andiv) an on-device pump fluidly connected to the second end of the microfluidic channel; andb) a solute mixing subcircuit comprising: i) a serpentine mixing channel, said mixing channel having a first end and a second end and having a critical length for enabling solute mixture by diffusion;ii) first, second, and third intake channels fluidly joined to said first end of said mixing channel at a staging union; said first intake channel for conveying a first fluid, said second intake channel for conveying a second fluid, and said third intake channel for conveying a third fluid; wherein said staging union is configured with micro-passive valves for simultaneously releasing said first, second, and third fluids into said staging union and into said mixing channel, and for simultaneously mixing said first second, and third fluids in said staging union and in said mixing channel;iii) a downstream channel fluidly joined to the second end of said mixing channel, wherein the downstream channel has a width greater than the width of the mixing channel;iv) a pump for controlledly initiating fluid flow across said micro-passive valves, wherein said pump is fluidly connected to said downstream channel, and initiates flow by a suction stroke; andv) a vent terminating said downstream channel,wherein the fluid separation subcircuit and solute mixing subcircuits are fluidly connected.
  • 2. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the composite membrane comprises at least two membranes.
  • 3. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the composite membrane further comprises a porous membrane.
  • 4. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the composite filter further comprises an activator of blood coagulation.
  • 5. A method for performing a cross match of a donor blood sample and a recipient blood sample, the method comprising: a) introducing the donor blood sample into the sample inlet of the microfluidic device of claim 1 and contacting the donor blood sample with the composite membrane to separate donor serum from the donor blood sample;b) contacting the donor serum with the recipient blood sample in the mixing channel; andc) observing the presence or absence of an agglutination reaction.
  • 6. The microfluidic device of claim 1 wherein the first fluid comprises a particulate suspension of red blood cells, the second fluid comprises separated serum, and the third fluid comprises a diluent.
  • 7. The microfluidic device of claim 1 wherein the composite membrane includes platelet activating factor.
  • 8. The microfluidic device of claim 1 wherein the composite membrane includes collagen.
  • 9. The microfluidic device of claim 1 wherein the composite membrane includes hollow beads.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2014/037192 5/7/2014 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/182844 11/13/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (424)
Number Name Date Kind
2770572 Eldon Nov 1956 A
3013467 Marvi Dec 1961 A
3640267 Hurtig et al. Feb 1972 A
3686355 Gaines, Jr. et al. Aug 1972 A
3799742 Coleman Mar 1974 A
3996345 Ullman et al. Dec 1976 A
4104029 Maier Aug 1978 A
4235960 Sasse et al. Nov 1980 A
4304257 Webster Dec 1981 A
4366241 Tom et al. Dec 1982 A
4373932 Gribnau et al. Feb 1983 A
4387183 Francis Jun 1983 A
4477575 Vogel et al. Oct 1984 A
4610678 Weisman et al. Sep 1986 A
4683195 Mullis et al. Jul 1987 A
4683202 Mullis Jul 1987 A
4756884 Hillman et al. Jul 1988 A
4788729 Walker Dec 1988 A
4798703 Minekane Jan 1989 A
4800159 Mullis et al. Jan 1989 A
4810630 Craig et al. Mar 1989 A
4833332 Robertson, Jr. et al. May 1989 A
4837168 De Jaegerd et al. Jun 1989 A
4848722 Webster Jul 1989 A
4855240 Rosenstein et al. Aug 1989 A
4869282 Sittler et al. Sep 1989 A
4883750 Whiteley et al. Nov 1989 A
4889818 Gelfand et al. Dec 1989 A
4894416 Gallucci Jan 1990 A
4943522 Eisinger et al. Jul 1990 A
4945039 Suzuki et al. Jul 1990 A
4952516 Matkovich Aug 1990 A
4956302 Gordon et al. Sep 1990 A
4965188 Mullis et al. Oct 1990 A
5038852 Johnson et al. Aug 1991 A
5075078 Osikowicz et al. Dec 1991 A
5075212 Rotbart Dec 1991 A
5100626 Levin Mar 1992 A
5120643 Ching et al. Jun 1992 A
5130238 Malek et al. Jul 1992 A
5140161 Hillman et al. Aug 1992 A
5141850 Cole et al. Aug 1992 A
5145578 Tokubo et al. Sep 1992 A
5147607 Mochida Sep 1992 A
5160701 Brown et al. Nov 1992 A
5192980 Dixon et al. Mar 1993 A
5225163 Andrews Jul 1993 A
5231035 Akers, Jr. Jul 1993 A
5234809 Boom et al. Aug 1993 A
5252459 Tarcha et al. Oct 1993 A
5270183 Corbett et al. Dec 1993 A
5273684 Traber et al. Dec 1993 A
5275785 May et al. Jan 1994 A
5296703 Tsien Mar 1994 A
5304487 Wilding et al. Apr 1994 A
5338689 Yves et al. Aug 1994 A
5354668 Auerbach Oct 1994 A
5354815 Barringer, Jr. et al. Oct 1994 A
5387526 Garner et al. Feb 1995 A
5415994 Imrich et al. May 1995 A
5420016 Boguslaski et al. May 1995 A
5427930 Birkenmeyer et al. Jun 1995 A
5443890 Ohman Aug 1995 A
5447440 Davis et al. Sep 1995 A
5455166 Walker Oct 1995 A
5478751 Oosta et al. Dec 1995 A
5486335 Wilding et al. Jan 1996 A
5489624 Kantner et al. Feb 1996 A
5498392 Wilding et al. Mar 1996 A
5504013 Senior Apr 1996 A
5508313 Delgado et al. Apr 1996 A
5543026 Hoff et al. Aug 1996 A
5552064 Chachowski et al. Sep 1996 A
5565366 Akers, Jr. Oct 1996 A
5578818 Kain et al. Nov 1996 A
5582989 Caskey et al. Dec 1996 A
5587128 Wilding et al. Dec 1996 A
5591645 Rosenstein Jan 1997 A
5593824 Treml et al. Jan 1997 A
5602040 May et al. Feb 1997 A
5614598 Barringer, Jr. et al. Mar 1997 A
5622871 May et al. Apr 1997 A
5631734 Stern et al. May 1997 A
5635358 Wilding et al. Jun 1997 A
5635602 Cantor et al. Jun 1997 A
5639428 Cottingham Jun 1997 A
5656503 May et al. Aug 1997 A
5658723 Oberhardt Aug 1997 A
5660178 Kantner et al. Aug 1997 A
5660370 Webster Aug 1997 A
5660990 Rao et al. Aug 1997 A
5670381 Jou et al. Sep 1997 A
5685758 Paul et al. Nov 1997 A
5702953 Mazurek et al. Dec 1997 A
5707516 Tomizawa et al. Jan 1998 A
5707807 Kato Jan 1998 A
5716842 Baier et al. Feb 1998 A
5716852 Yager et al. Feb 1998 A
5718567 Rapp et al. Feb 1998 A
5724404 Garcia et al. Mar 1998 A
5726026 Wilding et al. Mar 1998 A
5726404 Brody Mar 1998 A
5726751 Altendorf et al. Mar 1998 A
5730850 Kambara et al. Mar 1998 A
5731212 Gavin et al. Mar 1998 A
5747349 Van Denva et al. May 1998 A
5748827 Holl et al. May 1998 A
5759014 Van Lintel Jun 1998 A
5770460 Pawlak et al. Jun 1998 A
5788927 Farrell et al. Aug 1998 A
5795543 Poto et al. Aug 1998 A
5798273 Shuler et al. Aug 1998 A
5830411 Gisper-Sauch Nov 1998 A
5856174 Lipshutz et al. Jan 1999 A
5863502 Southgate et al. Jan 1999 A
5863801 Southgate et al. Jan 1999 A
5872710 Kameyama Feb 1999 A
5905028 Frame et al. May 1999 A
5906602 Weber et al. May 1999 A
5922210 Brody et al. Jul 1999 A
5922591 Anderson et al. Jul 1999 A
5928880 Wilding et al. Jul 1999 A
5932100 Yager et al. Aug 1999 A
5932799 Moles Aug 1999 A
5948684 Weigl et al. Sep 1999 A
5955029 Wilding et al. Sep 1999 A
5965410 Chow et al. Oct 1999 A
5971158 Yager et al. Oct 1999 A
5971355 Biegelsen et al. Oct 1999 A
5972710 Weigl et al. Oct 1999 A
5972721 Bruno et al. Oct 1999 A
5974867 Forster et al. Nov 1999 A
5985990 Kantner et al. Nov 1999 A
5989813 Gerdes Nov 1999 A
6001307 Naka et al. Dec 1999 A
6007309 Hartley Dec 1999 A
6007775 Yager Dec 1999 A
6018616 Schaper Jan 2000 A
6020187 Tam Feb 2000 A
6037168 Brown Mar 2000 A
6040048 Kato et al. Mar 2000 A
6040193 Winkler et al. Mar 2000 A
6057167 Shieh et al. May 2000 A
6068752 Dubrow et al. May 2000 A
6086740 Kennedy Jul 2000 A
6114179 Lapierre et al. Sep 2000 A
6121508 Bischof et al. Sep 2000 A
6136272 Weigl et al. Oct 2000 A
6158712 Craig Dec 2000 A
6168948 Anderson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171865 Weigl et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184029 Wilding et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210514 Cheung et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210882 Landers et al. Apr 2001 B1
6239228 Zajaczkowski et al. May 2001 B1
6272939 Frye et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287850 Besemer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297061 Wu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303389 Levin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309875 Gordon Oct 2001 B1
6325975 Naka et al. Dec 2001 B1
6326211 Anderson et al. Dec 2001 B1
6368876 Huang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387290 Brody et al. May 2002 B1
6390791 Maillefer et al. May 2002 B1
6399398 Cunningham et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409832 Weigl et al. Jun 2002 B2
6418968 Pezzuto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6431212 Hayenga et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432212 Hirose et al. Aug 2002 B1
6439036 Mansky Aug 2002 B1
6451610 Gorman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6468807 Svensson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472161 Baugh Oct 2002 B1
6488896 Weigl et al. Dec 2002 B2
6506346 Monro Jan 2003 B1
6541213 Weigl et al. Apr 2003 B1
6541274 Nagle et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562209 Sullivan et al. May 2003 B1
6569674 McGarry et al. May 2003 B1
6576459 Miles et al. Jun 2003 B2
6581899 Williams Jun 2003 B2
6614030 Maher et al. Sep 2003 B2
6620273 Dai et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632655 Mehta et al. Oct 2003 B1
6635487 Lee et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637463 Lei et al. Oct 2003 B1
6664104 Pourahmadi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6706836 Holguin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720411 Mirkin et al. Apr 2004 B2
6729352 O'Connor et al. May 2004 B2
6731178 Gailhard et al. May 2004 B2
6731781 Shams et al. May 2004 B1
6743399 Weigl et al. Jun 2004 B1
6748975 Hartshorne et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752966 Chazan Jun 2004 B1
6758107 Cabuz Jul 2004 B2
6767194 Jeon et al. Jul 2004 B2
6787338 Wittwer et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793753 Unger et al. Sep 2004 B2
6815160 Chien et al. Nov 2004 B1
6843263 Kuo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6852284 Holl et al. Feb 2005 B1
6872566 Vischer et al. Mar 2005 B2
6901949 Cox et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916113 Van De et al. Jul 2005 B2
6933109 Anderson Aug 2005 B2
6951632 Unger et al. Oct 2005 B2
6953675 Leung et al. Oct 2005 B2
6953676 Wilding et al. Oct 2005 B1
6955738 Derand et al. Oct 2005 B2
6974119 Brendle et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974669 Mirkin et al. Dec 2005 B2
7010391 Handique et al. Mar 2006 B2
7052594 Pelrine et al. May 2006 B2
7087414 Gerdes et al. Aug 2006 B2
7141416 Krutzik Nov 2006 B2
7153673 Stern Dec 2006 B2
7223363 McNeely et al. May 2007 B2
7223371 Hayenga et al. May 2007 B2
7226562 Holl et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235400 Adey Jun 2007 B2
7241421 Webster et al. Jul 2007 B2
7312085 Chou et al. Dec 2007 B2
7318913 Loeffler et al. Jan 2008 B2
7378451 Levitt et al. May 2008 B2
7416892 Battrell et al. Aug 2008 B2
7419638 Saltsman et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445926 Mathies et al. Nov 2008 B2
7467928 Fakunle et al. Dec 2008 B2
7514212 Prudent et al. Apr 2009 B2
7517651 Marshall et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541147 Marshall et al. Jun 2009 B2
7544506 Breidford et al. Jun 2009 B2
7607641 Yuan Oct 2009 B1
7615370 Streit et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618590 Gleason et al. Nov 2009 B2
7648835 Breidford et al. Jan 2010 B2
7695683 Quan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7749444 Yamada et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763453 Clemmens et al. Jul 2010 B2
7785776 Wittwer et al. Aug 2010 B2
7832429 Young et al. Nov 2010 B2
7906317 Lee et al. Mar 2011 B2
7955836 Clemmens et al. Jun 2011 B2
8104497 Unger et al. Jan 2012 B2
8104514 Fernandes et al. Jan 2012 B2
8110392 Battrell et al. Feb 2012 B2
8222023 Battrell et al. Jul 2012 B2
8318109 Saltsman et al. Nov 2012 B2
8318439 Battrell et al. Nov 2012 B2
8329453 Battrell et al. Dec 2012 B2
8431389 Battrell et al. Apr 2013 B2
8557198 Saltsman et al. Oct 2013 B2
8697009 Saltsman et al. Apr 2014 B2
8716007 Battrell et al. May 2014 B2
8747779 Sprague et al. Jun 2014 B2
8772017 Battrell et al. Jul 2014 B2
9056291 Battrell et al. Jun 2015 B2
9132423 Battrell et al. Sep 2015 B2
9146246 Battrell et al. Sep 2015 B2
9272280 Viola et al. Mar 2016 B2
10087440 Lofquist et al. Oct 2018 B2
20010027745 Weigl et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010046701 Schulte et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020022261 Anderson et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020037499 Quake et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020081569 Anderson Jun 2002 A1
20020081934 Murao et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086443 Bamdad Jul 2002 A1
20020137196 Miles et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020148992 Hayenga et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020155010 Karp et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020160518 Hayenga et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020164816 Quake Nov 2002 A1
20020192676 Madonna et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020195152 Fernandes et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030008308 Enzelberger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030013184 Streit et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030013203 Jedrzejewski et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032028 Dace et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030073229 Greenstein et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030124619 Weigl et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030124623 Yager et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030129756 Thorne et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030136178 Cabuz Jul 2003 A1
20030152927 Jakobsen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030152994 Woudenberg et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030153686 Onoe et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030175990 Hayenga et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185713 Leonard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215818 Lorenz Nov 2003 A1
20030215825 Tong Nov 2003 A1
20030224434 Wittwer et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005718 Fukushima Jan 2004 A1
20040018611 Ward et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024051 Holton Feb 2004 A1
20040037739 McNeely et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040065930 Lin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081997 Stern Apr 2004 A1
20040115094 Gumbrecht et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115831 Meathrel et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115838 Quake et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121364 Chee et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040124384 Biegelsen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040129678 Crowley et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040189311 Glezer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040209354 Mathies et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224339 Numajiri et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040224425 Gjerde et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040226348 Bruce et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040241051 Wyzgol et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242770 Feldstein et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040248167 Quake et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040265171 Pugia et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050013732 Battrell et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050019792 McBride et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050019898 Adey et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050037397 Mirkin et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050041525 Pugia et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050084421 Unger et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050106742 Wahl et al. May 2005 A1
20050118570 Hollis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050129581 McBride et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050129582 Breidford et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136552 Buechler Jun 2005 A1
20050142582 Doyle et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157301 Chediak et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050161669 Jovanovich et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050164373 Oldham et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050186585 Juncosa et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050205816 Hayenga et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050217741 Bohm Oct 2005 A1
20050221281 Ho Oct 2005 A1
20050284817 Fernandez et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060003440 Streit et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060073484 Mathies et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060076068 Young et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060094119 Ismagilov et al. May 2006 A1
20060099116 Manger et al. May 2006 A1
20060099413 Lu May 2006 A1
20060105402 Rott et al. May 2006 A1
20060127886 Kaylor et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060166375 Hawkins et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060178568 Danna et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060245978 Prins Nov 2006 A1
20060246575 Lancaster et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060254916 Hernandez et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263816 Laikhter et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060264782 Holmes et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060275852 Montagu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060275893 Ishii et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292588 Chou et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060292630 Fukumoto Dec 2006 A1
20070003447 Gleason et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070008536 Mitani et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070009383 Bedingham et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014695 Yue et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070042427 Gerdes et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070077610 Ghai et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070125947 Sprinzak et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070134810 Yang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070154895 Spaid et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166199 Zhou et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183935 Clemmens et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070190525 Gu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219366 Gumbrecht et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070234785 Beerling et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070243603 Einsle et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070248983 Schwind et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070280856 Ulmanella et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070292858 Chen et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080050283 Chou et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080056953 Yamada et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081341 Maher et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080085551 Kim et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080124749 Farnam et al. May 2008 A1
20080145280 Bookbinder et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080226500 Shikida et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080260586 Boamfa Oct 2008 A1
20080274511 Tan et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297792 Kim et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090000678 Therriault et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090017483 Yamaoka et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090022624 Saltsman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090047713 Handique Feb 2009 A1
20090061450 Hunter Mar 2009 A1
20090111159 Brolaski et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090148847 Kokoris et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148933 Battrell et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090181411 Battrell et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090298059 Gumbrecht et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090325203 Jenny et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090325276 Battrell et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100041049 Smith et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100120129 Amshey et al. May 2010 A1
20100167384 Clemmens et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100291588 McDevitt et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303687 Blaga et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110151479 Stevens et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110207621 Montagu et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120028342 Ismagilov et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120064597 Clemmens et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071342 Lochhead et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120115214 Battrell et al. May 2012 A1
20120135511 Battrell et al. May 2012 A1
20120156750 Battrell et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164383 Sollmann Jun 2012 A1
20120164627 Battrell et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120177543 Battrell et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120329142 Battrell et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130011912 Battrell et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130017552 Rudorfer Jan 2013 A1
20130032235 Johnstone et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130130262 Battrell et al. May 2013 A1
20140349381 Battrell et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140370581 Saltsman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150158026 Battrell et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150321193 Sprague et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150346097 Battrell et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150352549 Kolb et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160102340 Bouzek Apr 2016 A1
20160209431 Battrell et al. Jul 2016 A1
20170113221 Hoffman et al. Apr 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (156)
Number Date Country
1146017 Mar 1997 CN
1253625 May 2000 CN
102602087 Jul 2012 CN
20 2004 012 163 Nov 2004 DE
0 039 195 Jun 1986 EP
0 320 308 Jun 1989 EP
0 329 822 Aug 1989 EP
0 399 859 Nov 1990 EP
0 456 699 Nov 1991 EP
0 517 631 Dec 1992 EP
0 869 979 Nov 2000 EP
1 203 959 May 2002 EP
1 240 945 Sep 2002 EP
1 180 135 Aug 2005 EP
1 659 405 May 2006 EP
1 707 965 Oct 2006 EP
1 726 940 Nov 2006 EP
1 792 654 Jun 2007 EP
1 263 533 Mar 2010 EP
2 202 328 Jun 2010 EP
2 202 328 Sep 1988 GB
52-55679 May 1977 JP
6-94722 Apr 1994 JP
7-151101 Jun 1995 JP
7-506258 Jul 1995 JP
7-506430 Jul 1995 JP
7-506431 Jul 1995 JP
2520468 Dec 1996 JP
9-509498 Sep 1997 JP
10-82773 Mar 1998 JP
10-132712 May 1998 JP
11-508182 Jul 1999 JP
11-508347 Jul 1999 JP
11-509094 Aug 1999 JP
11-512645 Nov 1999 JP
2000-314719 Nov 2000 JP
2002-17861 Jan 2002 JP
2002-371955 Dec 2002 JP
2003-166910 Jun 2003 JP
2003-207454 Jul 2003 JP
2003-220897 Aug 2003 JP
2004-028589 Jan 2004 JP
2004-333452 Nov 2004 JP
2005-512071 Apr 2005 JP
2005-531006 Oct 2005 JP
2005-345378 Dec 2005 JP
2006-73371 Mar 2006 JP
2006-84459 Mar 2006 JP
2006-90774 Apr 2006 JP
2006-122743 May 2006 JP
2006-517029 Jul 2006 JP
2006-227301 Aug 2006 JP
2006-246777 Sep 2006 JP
2006-520190 Sep 2006 JP
2007-514142 May 2007 JP
2007-532918 Nov 2007 JP
2008-503722 Feb 2008 JP
2008-89597 Apr 2008 JP
2008-96375 Apr 2008 JP
2008-537063 Sep 2008 JP
2009-14529 Jan 2009 JP
2009-019962 Jan 2009 JP
2009-513966 Apr 2009 JP
2009-529883 Aug 2009 JP
2009-255083 Nov 2009 JP
2010-78508 Apr 2010 JP
2010-519463 Jun 2010 JP
2015-510111 Apr 2015 JP
590982 Jun 2004 TW
8606488 Nov 1986 WO
8808534 Nov 1988 WO
8810315 Dec 1988 WO
8906700 Jul 1989 WO
8909284 Oct 1989 WO
9009596 Aug 1990 WO
9112336 Aug 1991 WO
9325889 Dec 1993 WO
9614934 May 1996 WO
9633399 Oct 1996 WO
9701055 Jan 1997 WO
9702357 Jan 1997 WO
9739338 Oct 1997 WO
9747390 Dec 1997 WO
9748779 Dec 1997 WO
9849543 Nov 1998 WO
9917100 Apr 1999 WO
9922858 May 1999 WO
0022436 Apr 2000 WO
0056828 Sep 2000 WO
0063670 Oct 2000 WO
0110565 Feb 2001 WO
0113127 Feb 2001 WO
0126813 Apr 2001 WO
0168238 Sep 2001 WO
01070381 Sep 2001 WO
0175415 Oct 2001 WO
02001184 Jan 2002 WO
02012896 Feb 2002 WO
02041994 May 2002 WO
02072262 Sep 2002 WO
02081934 Oct 2002 WO
03007786 Jan 2003 WO
03015923 Feb 2003 WO
03031977 Apr 2003 WO
03049860 Jun 2003 WO
03054523 Jul 2003 WO
03097831 Nov 2003 WO
03099355 Dec 2003 WO
03101887 Dec 2003 WO
03102546 Dec 2003 WO
2004055198 Jul 2004 WO
2004061085 Jul 2004 WO
2004065010 Aug 2004 WO
2004065930 Aug 2004 WO
2004093786 Nov 2004 WO
2005016529 Feb 2005 WO
2005022154 Mar 2005 WO
2005066638 Jul 2005 WO
2005069015 Jul 2005 WO
2005083025 Sep 2005 WO
2005088280 Sep 2005 WO
2005090970 Sep 2005 WO
2005106024 Nov 2005 WO
2005118849 Dec 2005 WO
2006009724 Jan 2006 WO
2006018811 Feb 2006 WO
2006035830 Apr 2006 WO
2006052652 May 2006 WO
2006076567 Jul 2006 WO
2006083833 Aug 2006 WO
2006125767 Nov 2006 WO
2007049009 May 2007 WO
2007064635 Jun 2007 WO
2007106579 Sep 2007 WO
2007106580 Sep 2007 WO
2007109584 Sep 2007 WO
2007137291 Nov 2007 WO
2008002462 Jan 2008 WO
2008036544 Mar 2008 WO
2008070198 Jun 2008 WO
2008101732 Aug 2008 WO
2008147382 Dec 2008 WO
2009018473 Feb 2009 WO
2009037361 Mar 2009 WO
2009105711 Aug 2009 WO
2010025302 Mar 2010 WO
2010040103 Apr 2010 WO
2010088514 Aug 2010 WO
2011094577 Aug 2011 WO
2012071069 May 2012 WO
2013010674 Jan 2013 WO
2013052318 Apr 2013 WO
2014100732 Jun 2014 WO
2014182831 Nov 2014 WO
2014182844 Nov 2014 WO
2014182847 Nov 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (151)
Entry
Coombs et al., “A New Test for the Detection of Weak and “Incomplete” RH Agglutinins,” Brit J Exp Path 26:255-266, Jul. 1945.
Dujardin et al., “Errors in Interpreting the Pretransfusion Bedside Compatibility Test,” Vox Sang 78:37-43, 2000.
Gravesen et al., “Microfluidics—a review,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 3:168-182, 1993.
Hatch et al., “A rapid diffusion immunoassay in a T-sensor,” Nature Biotechnology 19:461-465, May 2001.
Hosokawa et al., “Hydrophobic Microcapillary Vent for Pneumatic Manipulation of Liquid in mTas,” Proceedings of the uTAS '98 Workshop, held in Banff, Canada, 307-310, Oct. 13-16, 1998, 6 pages.
Ingrand et al., “Reliability of the pretransfusion bedside compatibility test: association with transfusion practice and training,” Transfusion 38:1030-1036, Nov./Dec. 1998.
Lapierre et al., “The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions,” Transfusion 30(2):109-113, 1990.
Lee et al., “Flow Characteristics of Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Capillaries Considering Surface Tension,” 2nd Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Poster 150, 560-564, May 2-4, 2002.
Migeot et al., “Reliability of bedside ABO testing before transfusion,” Transfusion 42:1348-1355, Oct. 2002.
Polpanich et al., “Detection of Malaria Infection via Latex Agglutination Assay,” Anal. Chem. 79:4690-4695, 2007.
Thompson et al., “Kinetics and proposed mechanism of the reaction of an immunoinhibition, particle-enhanced immunoassay,” Clinical Chemistry 43(11):2384-2389, 1997.
Al Zahrani et al., “Accuracy and Utility of Commercially Available Amplification and Serologic Tests for the Diagnosis of Minimal Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:1323-1329, 2000.
Aoki et al., “Serine Repeat Antigen (SERA5) is Predominantly Expressed among the SERA Multigene Family of Plasmodium falciparum, and the Acquired Antibody Titers Correlate with Serum Inhibition of the Parasite Growth,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(49):47533-47540, 2002.
Arar et al., “Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugates Prepared by Using Na-(Bromoacetyl)peptides,” Bioconjugate Chem. 6(5):573-577, 1995.
Arikan et al., “Anti-Kp 90 IgA Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis,” Chest 114(5):1253-1257, 1998.
Bangs Laboratories, Inc., “Lateral Flow Tests,” TechNote 303, Rev. #002, Apr. 11, 2008. (7 pages).
Birkelund, “The molecular biology and diagnostics of Chlamydia trachomatis,” Danish Medical Bulletin 39(4):304-320, Aug. 1992.
Bongartz et al., “Improved biological activity of antisense oligonucleotides conjugated to a fusogenic peptide,” Nucleic Acids Research 22(22):4681-4688, 1994.
Bowden et al., “Using Self-Administered Tampons to Diagnose STDs,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs 12(1):29-32, 1998.
C. Fredrick Battrell et al., “Sample-To-Answer Microfluidic Cartridge,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,182, filed Aug. 5, 2015, 78 pages.
Cady, “Quantum Dot Molecular Beacons for DNA Detection,” in Micro and Nano Technologies in Bioanalysis, Lee et al., (eds.), Humana Press, 2009, pp. 367-379.
Cai et al., “Interactions of DNA with Clay Minerals and Soil Colloidal Particles and Protection against Degradation by Dnase,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:2971-2976, 2006.
Carmona et al., “The use of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) peptides for measurement of clinically important proteolytic enzymes,” An Acad Bras Cienc 81(3):381-392, 2009.
Chan et al., “Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons,” Surface Science Reports 24:1-54, 1996.
Chernesky et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Commercially Available Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection of Rubella Virus-Specific Immunoglobulin M,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 20(3):400-404, 1984.
Chernesky et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Antigens by Enzyme Immunoassay and Immunofluorescence in Genital Specimens from Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Men and Women,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases 154(1):141-148, 1986.
Chou et al., “Prevention of pre-PCR mis-priming and primer dimerization improves low-copy-number amplifications,” Nucleic Acids Research 20(7):1717-1723, 1992.
Cissell et al., “Resonance energy transfer methods of RNA detection,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 393:125-135, 2008.
Crotchfelt et al., “Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Genitourinary Specimens from Men and Women by a Coamplification PCR Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 35(6):1536-1540, 1997.
Cuzzubbo et al., “Use of Recombinant Envelope Proteins for Serological Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection in an Immunochromatographic Assay,” Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8(6):1150-1155, 2001.
D'Aquila et al., “Maximizing sensitivity and specificity of PCR by pre-amplification heating,” Nucleic Acids Research 19(13):3749, 1991.
Dean et al., “Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification,” PNAS 99(8):5261-5266, 2002.
Detter et al., “Isothermal Strand-Displacement Amplification Applications for High-Throughput Genomics,” Genomics 80(6):691-698, 2002.
Edelstein et al., “The BARC biosensor applied to the detection of biological warfare agents,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics 14:805-813, 2000.
Egger et al., “Reverse Transcription Multiplex PCR for Differentiation between Polio- and Enteroviruses from Clinical and Environmental Samples,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(6):1442-1447, 1995.
Eritja et al., “Synthesis of Defined Peptide-Oligonucleotide Hybrids Containing a Nuclear Transport Signal Sequence,” Tetrahedron 47(24):4113-4120, 1991.
Fontana et al., “Performance of Strand Displacement Amplification Assay in the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae,” Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 58:283-288, 2005.
Frame et al., “Identification and Typing of Herpes Simplex Virus by Enzyme Immunoassay with Monoclonal Antibodies,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 20(2):162-166, 1984.
Franchi et al., “Cations as Mediators of the Adsorption of Nucleic Acids on Clay Surfaces in Prebiotic Environments,” Orgins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 33:1-16, 2003.
Freund et al., (eds.), “Film buckling, bulging, and peeling,” in Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution, Cambridge, UK, The University of Cambridge, 2003, pp. 312-386. (77 pages).
Frohman, “Race: Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Innis et al., (eds.), New York , Academic Press, Inc., 1990, pp. 28-38.
Gallo et al., “Study of viral integration of HPV-16 in young patients with LSIL,” J. Clin. Pathol. 56:532-536, 2003.
Garbassi et al., “Chapter 6: Physical Modifications,” in Polymer Surfaces—From Physics to Technology, John Wiley and Sons, Baltimore, Md., 1994, pp. 223-241.
Genovese et al., “Virus Variability and Its Impact on HIV and Hepatitis Therapy,” Advances in Virology 2012:607527, 2012. (3 pages).
Ghai et al., “Identification, expression, and functional characterization of MAEBL, a sporozoite and asexual blood stage chimeric erythrocyte-binding protein of Plasmodium falciparum,” Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology 123:35-45, 2002.
Gijs, “Magnetic bead handling on-chip: new opportunities for analytical applications,” Microfluid Nanofluid 1:22-40, 2004.
Gomes et al., “Immunoreactivity and differential developmental expression of known and putative Chlamydia trachomatis membrane proteins for biologically variant serovars representing distinct disease groups,” Microbes and Infection 7:410-420, 2005.
Graham et al., “Magnetoresistive-based biosensors and biochips,” TRENDS in Biotechnology 22(9):455-462, 2004.
Graves et al., “Development of Antibody to Measles Virus Polypeptides During Complicated and Uncomplicated Measles Virus Infections,” Journal of Virology 49(2):409-412, 1984.
Grover et al., “Monolithic membrane valves and diaphragm pumps for practical large-scale integration into glass microfluidic devices,” Sensors and Actuators B 89:315-323, 2003.
Hardt et al., “Passive micromixers for applications in the microreactor and μTAS fields,” Microfluid Nanofluid 1:108-118, 2005.
Harris et al., “Typing of Dengue Viruses in Clinical Specimens and Mosquitoes by Single-Tube Multiplex Reverse Transcriptase PCR,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 36(9):2634-2639, 1998.
Harrison et al., “Synthesis and hybridization analysis of a small library of peptide-oligonucleotide conjugates,” Nucleic Acids Research 26(13):3136-3145, 1998.
Huft et al., “Fabrication of High-Quality Microfluidic Solid-Phase Chromatography Columns,” Anal. Chem. 85:1797-1802, 2013.
Hummel et al., “Development of quantitative gene-specific real-time RT-PCR assays for the detection of measles virus in clinical specimens,” Journal of Virological Methods 132:166-173, 2006.
Hung et al., “A specificity enhancer for polymerase chain reaction,” Nucleic Acids Research 18(16):4953, 1990.
Innis et al., (eds.), “Optimization of PCRs,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California, 1990, pp. 3-12. (11 pages).
Jacobs et al., “Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples by a Rapid Immunochromatographic Membrane Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(8):4037-4040, 2005.
Joung et al., “Micropumps Based on Alternating High-Gradient Magnetic Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36(4):2012-2014, 2000.
Kanehisa, “Use of statistical criteria for screening potential homologies in nucleic acid sequences,” Nucleic Acids Research 12(1):203-213, 1984.
Kellogg et al., “TaqStart Antibody™: ‘Hot Start’ PCR Facilitated by a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Directed Against Taq DNA Polymerase,” BioTechniques 16(6):1134-1137, 1994. (6 pages).
Kennedy et al., “Protein-Protein Coupling Reactions and the Applications of Protein Conjugates,” Clinica Chimica Acta 70:1-31, 1976. (16 pages).
Khan et al., “Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Gene, and Molecular Profiles of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Diverse Sources in Calcutta, India,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 40(6):2009-2015, 2002.
Khan et al., “Prevalence and Genetic Profiling of Virulence Determinants of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Cattle, Beef, and Humans, Calcutta, India,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 8(1):54-62, 2002.
Khanna et al., “Transformation of Bacillus subtilis by DNA Bound on Montmorillonite and Effect of DNase on the Transforming Ability of Bound DNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58(6):1930-1939, 1992.
Kittigul et al., “Use of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Early Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection,” Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:224-226, 2002.
Knox et al., “Evaluation of Self-Collected Samples in Contrast to Practitioner-Collected Samples for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Among Women Living in Remote Areas,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29(11):647-654, 2002.
Krasnoperov et al., “Luminescent Probes for Ultrasensitive Detection of Nucleic Acids,” Bioconjug. Chem. 21(2):319-327, 2010. (20 pages).
Kremer et al., “Measles Virus Genotyping by Nucleotide-Specific Multiplex PCR,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 42(7):3017-3022, 2004.
Kuipers et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in peripheral blood leukocytes of reactive arthritis patients by polymerase chain reaction,” Arthritis & Rheumatism 41(10):1894-1895, 1998.
Kuipers et al., “Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for Purified Chlamydia trachomatis Elementary Bodies in Urine, Peripheral Blood, Peripheral Blood Leukocytes, and Synovial Fluid,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 33(12):3186-3190, 1995.
Kuno, “Universal diagnostic RT-PCR protocol for arboviruses,” Journal of Virological Methods 72:27-41, 1998.
Kwoh et al., “Transcription-based amplification system and detection of amplified human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with a bead-based sandwich hybridization format,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:1173-1177, 1989.
Lage et al., “Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array-CGH,” Genome Research 13:294-307, 2003.
Lanciotti et al., “Rapid Detection and Typing of Dengue Viruses from Clinical Samples by Using Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 30(3):545-551, 1992.
Leclerc et al., “Meager genetic variability of the human malaria agent Plasmodium vivax,” PNAS 101(40):14455-14460, 2004.
Lee et al., “Implementation of Force Differentiation in the Immunoassay,” Analytical Biochemistry 287:261-271, 2000.
Leung et al., “Rapid antigen detection testing in diagnosing group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis,” Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 6(5):761-766, 2006.
Li et al., “Molecular beacons: An optimal multifunctional biological probe,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 373:457-461, 2008.
Lindegren et al., “Optimized Diagnosis of Acute Dengue Fever in Swedish Travelers by a Combination of Reverse Transcription-PCR and Immunoglobulin M Detection,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 43(6):2850-2855, 2005.
Ling et al., “The Plasmodium falciparum clag9 gene encodes a rhoptry protein that is transferred to the host erythrocyte upon invasion,” Molecular Microbiology 52(1):107-118, 2004.
Lundquist et al., “Human Recombinant Antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein 3 Cloned from Peripheral Blood Leukocytes of Individuals with Immunity to Malaria Demonstrate Antiparasitic Properties,” Infect. Immun. 74(6):3222-3231, 2006.
Luxton et al., “Use of External Magnetic Fields to Reduce Reaction Times in an Immunoassay Using Micrometer-Sized Paramagnetic Particles as Labels (Magnetoimmunoassay),” Anal. Chem. 76(6):1715-1719, 2004.
Mahony et al., “Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing of PCR-positive genitourinary specimens using a second set of plasmid primers,” Molecular and Cellular Probes 6:381-388, 1992.
Mahony et al., “Comparison of Plasmid- and Chromosome-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis Nucleic Acids,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 31(7):1753-1758, 1993.
Mahony et al., “Detection of Antichlamydial Immunoglobulin G and M Antibodies by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 18(2):270-275, 1983.
Mahony et al., “Multiplex PCR for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genitourinary Specimens,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 33(11):3049-3053, 1995.
Mahony, “Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases,” Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 16(1):61-71, 1996.
Mayta et al., “Use of a reliable PCR assay for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Peruvian patients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 12(8):809-812, 2006.
Michon et al., “Naturally Acquired and Vaccine-Elicited Antibodies Block Erythrocyte Cytoadherence of the Plasmodium vivax Duffy Binding Protein,” Infect. Immun. 68(6):3164-3171, 2000.
Migot-Nabias et al., “Immune Responses Against Plasmodium Falciparum Asexual Blood-Stage Antigens and Disease Susceptibility in Gabonese and Cameroonian Children,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61(3):488-494, 1999.
Mitrani-Rosenbaum et al., “Simultaneous detection of three common sexually transmitted agents by polymerase chain reaction,” Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(3):784-790, 1994.
Mohmmed et al., “Identification of karyopherin β as an immunogenic antigen of the malaria parasite using immune mice and human sera,” Parasite Immunology 27:197-203, 2005.
Monis et al., “Nucleic acid amplification-based techniques for pathogen detection and identification,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution 6:2-12, 2006.
Morré et al., “RNA Amplification by Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification with an Internal Standard Enables Reliable Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Cervical Scrapings and Urine Samples,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 34(12):3108-3114, 1996.
Narum et al., “A novel Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte binding protein-2 (EBP2/BAEBL) involved in erythrocyte receptor binding,” Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology 119:159-168, 2002.
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01000910, Jun. 9, 2009. (2 pages).
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004315, Jun. 9, 2009. (2 pages).
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004318, Jun. 9, 2009. (1 page).
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004329, Jun. 9, 2009. (1 page).
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. ACOL01004331, Jun. 9, 2009. (1 page).
NCBI Database, GenBank Accession No. NP_473155, Jan. 3, 2007. (2 pages).
Nielsen et al., “Detection of Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Cytomegalovirus Antigens by Antibody Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 24(6):998-1003, 1986.
Notomi et al., “Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research 28(12):e63, 2000. (7 pages).
Oeuvray et al., “Merozoite Surface Protein-3: A Malaria Protein Inducing Antibodies that Promote Plasmodium falciparum Killing by Cooperation With Blood Monocytes,” Blood 84(5):1594-1602, 1994.
Ohara et al., “One-sided polymerase chain reaction: The amplification of cDNA,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:5673-5677, 1989.
Ohta et al., “Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of Influenza Specific IgA Antibody in Nasal Mucus,” Acta Paediatr. Jpn. 33:617-622, 1991. (8 pages).
Østergaard et al., “A novel approach to the automation of clinical chemistry by controlled manipulation of magnetic particles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 194:156-162, 1999.
Ozoemena et al., “Comparative Evaluation of Measles Virus Specific TaqMan PCR and Conventional PCR Using Synthetic and Natural RNA Templates,” Journal of Medical Virology 73:79-84, 2004.
Park et al., “Polymorphisms of p53, p21 and IRF-1 and cervical cancer susceptibility in Korean women,” Proceedings of the American Association of Cancer Research 44, Second Edition, p. 1081, 2003.
Pfyffer et al., “Diagnostic Performance of Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test with Cerebrospinal Fluid, Other Nonrespiratory, and Respiratory Specimens,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(4):834-841, 1996.
Pinder et al., “Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Merozoite Surface Antigens are Associated with Recovery from Choroquine-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Gambian Children,” Infect. Immun. 74(5):2887-2893, 2006.
Pingle et al., “Multiplexed Identification of Blood-Borne Bacterial Pathogens by Use of a Novel 16S rRNA Gene PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction-Capillary Electrophoresis Assay,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 45(6):1927-1935, 2007.
Polley et al., “Vaccination for vivax malaria: targeting the invaders,” Trends in Parasitology 20(3):99-102, 2004.
Porstmann et al., “Comparison of Chromogens for the Determination of Horseradish Peroxidase as a Marker in Enzyme Immunoassay,” J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 19(7):435-439, 1981.
Ramachandran et al., “Dry-reagent storage for disposable lab-on-a-card diagnosis of enteric pathogens,” Proceedings of the 1st Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare (D2H2) Conference, Arlington, Virginia, USA, Apr. 2-4, 2006, pp. 16-19.
Ranjan et al., “Mapping regions containing binding residues within functional domains of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi erythrocyte-binding proteins,” PNAS 96(24): 14067-14072, 1999.
Rida et al., “Long-range transport of magnetic microbeads using simple planar coils placed in a uniform magnetostatic field,” Applied Physics Letters 83(12):2396-2398, 2003.
Roosendaal et al., “Comparison of different primer sets for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction,” J. Med. Microbiol. 38:426-433, 1993.
Schachter et al., “Ligase Chain Reaction to Detect Chlamydia trachomatis Infection of the Cervix,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 32(10):2540-2543, 1994.
Shi et al., “Fabrication and optimization of the multiplex PCR-based oligonucleotide microarray for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum,” Journal of Microbiological Methods 62:245-256, 2005.
Shi et al., “Natural Immune Response to the C-Terminal 19-Kilodalton Domain of Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein 1,” Infect. Immun. 64(7):2716-2723, 1996.
Shu et al., “Development of Group- and Serotype-Specific One-Step SYBR Green I-Based Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay for Dengue Virus,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 41(6):2408-2416, 2003.
Snounou et al., “High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 61:315-320, 1993.
Soukchareun et al., “Use of Nα-Fmoc-cysteine(S-thiobutyl) Derivatized Oligodeoxynucleotides for the Preparation of Oligodeoxynucleotide—Peptide Hybrid Molecules,” Bioconjugate Chem. 9:466-475, 1998.
Staben et al., “Particle transport in Poiseuille flow in narrow channels,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 31:529-547, 2005.
Stetsenko et al., “Efficient Conjugation of Peptides to Oligonucleotides by ‘Native Ligation’,” J. Org. Chem. 65:4900-4908, 2000.
Sturm et al., “Vaginal tampons as specimen collection device for the molecular diagnosis of non-ulcerative sexually transmitted infections in antenatal clinic attendees,” International Journal of STD & AIDS 15:94-98, 2004.
Tai et al., “Artificial Receptors in Serologic Tests for the Early Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infection,” Clinical Chemistry 52(8):1486-1491, 2006.
Tamim et al., “Cervicovaginal coinfections with human papillomavirus and chlamydia trachomatis,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 43:277-281, 2002.
Tongren et al., “Target Antigen, Age, and Duration of Antigen Exposure Independently Regulate Immunoglobulin G Subclass Switching in Malaria,” Infect. Immun. 74(1):257-264, 2006.
Trenholme et al., “Antibody Reactivity to Linear Epitopes of Plasmodium Falciparum Cytoadherence-Linked Asexual Gene 9 in Asymptomatic Children and Adults From Papua New Guinea,” Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72(6):708-713, 2005.
Tung et al., “Preparation and Applications of Peptide—Oligonucleotide Conjugates,” Bioconjugate Chem. 11(5):605-618, 2000.
Tung et al., “Preparation of Oligonucleotide-Peptide Conjugates,” Bioconjugate Chem. 2:464-465, 1991. (4 pages).
Unger et al., “Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography,” Science 288:113-116, 2000. (5 pages).
Van Gemen et al., “Quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma using NASBA™ during HIV-1 primary infection,” Journal of Virological Methods 43:177-188, 1993. (14 pages).
Van Lintel, “A Piezoelectric Micropump Based on Micromachining of Silicon,” Sensors and Actuators 15:153-167, 1988.
Vinayagamoorthy et al., “Nucleotide Sequence-Based Multitarget Identification,” J. Clin. Microbiol. 41(7):3284-3292, 2003.
Vivès et al., “Selective Coupling of a Highly Basic Peptide to an Oligonucleotide,” Tetrahedron Letters 38(7):1183-1186, 1997. (7 pages).
Walker et al., “Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique,” Nucleic Acids Research 20(7):1691-1696, 1992. (8 pages).
Walker, “Empirical Aspects of Strand Displacement Amplification,” PCR Methods and Applications 3:1-6, 1993.
Wang et al., “Molecular Engineering of DNA: Molecular Beacons,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(5):856-870, 2009. (34 pages).
Watson et al., Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th Ed., Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, California, Jan. 1987, pp. 226-227. (4 pages).
Weigl et al., “Fully integrated multiplexed lab-on-a-card assay for enteric pathogens,” Proc. of SPIE 6112:611202, 2006. (11 pages).
Weinstock et al., “Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among American Youth: Incidence and Prevalence Estimates, 2000,” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Heath 36(1):6-10, 2004.
Whiley et al., “Comparison of three in-house multiplex PCR assays for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis using real-time and conventional detection methodologies,” Pathology 37(5):364-370, 2005.
Witkin et al., “Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in the cervices of women with acute salpingitis,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 168(5):1438-1442, 1993.
Woehlbier et al., “Analysis of Antibodies Directed against Merozoite Surface Protein 1 of the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum,” Infect. Immun. 74(2):1313-1322, 2006.
Wu et al., “The Ligation Amplification Reaction (LAR)—Amplification of Specific DNA Sequences Using Sequential Rounds of Template-Dependent Ligation,” Genomics 4(1):560-569, 1989. (11 pages).
Yogi et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Bladder Tumor Marker ‘TU-MARK-BTA’,” Hinyokika Kiyo 37(4):335-339, 1991.
Zhang et al., “Synthesis of clay minerals,” Applied Clay Science 50:1-11, 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160109467 A1 Apr 2016 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
61820576 May 2013 US
61820585 May 2013 US
61820579 May 2013 US