This invention relates generally to biological tissue analysis in the medical diagnostics and biological research fields, and more specifically to an improved microfluidic system for automated processing of particles from biological fluid.
The identification of new biological markers (biomarkers) in biological tissue analysis is an increasingly essential element of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine as well as in biological tissue research. The fields of medical diagnostics and biological tissue research both depend heavily on the development of promising new biomarkers to help accelerate the delivery of new technologies, medicines and therapies for prevention, early detection, diagnosis and treatment of disease. Biological fluids, including but not limited to blood, urine, saliva and cerebral spinal fluid, are readily accessible for analysis, and various particles of interest in biological fluids can serve as important biomarkers in the fields of medical diagnostics and biological tissue analysis.
Particles of interest as biomarkers in biological fluids include but are not limited to cells, proteins, peptides and nucleic acids. For example, plasma, a component of blood, contains a very high concentration of such proteins and nucleic acids, including diagnostically relevant plasma proteins and RNA transcripts. Diagnostically relevant plasma proteins and other biomarkers are, however, typically in low abundance relative to other proteins such as Human Serum Albumin (HAS), which constitutes over half of all plasma proteins. Analysis of diagnostically relevant plasma proteins represents a tremendous analytical challenge, since such analysis almost always requires depletion of high abundance proteins such as HAS and immunoglobulins (IgG), which by themselves make up approximately 80% of the total proteins in plasma, and serve to decrease the efficacy of various assays by interfering with the detection of less abundant proteins and other particles. Multiple studies have demonstrated improved efficacy and resolution of various assays, with reduced noise and increased sensitivity, when the sample is pre-processed to deplete HAS and IgG.
Current technologies used to deplete HAS and IgG include approaches that rely on physiochemical approaches to fractionate the sample such as alcohol preparation, ultracentrifugation, salting in/salting out, as well as extraction through chromatography columns, extraction through 2D gel electrophoresis, and immuno-affinity columns that contain covalently attached antibodies specific to abundant plasma proteins for selective capture of plasma proteins. However, these current technologies have drawbacks. Major issues include variability in sample collection and handling that introduce handling artifacts, lack of standardized protocols and instrumentation, and extended processing time which prevents accurate analysis of the sample at the time of collection, resulting in time-dependent changes in the sample. Depletion of high abundance proteins via gel electrophoresis or chromatography also carries the risk of the “sponge effect”, in which small proteins and peptides bind to larger carriers. Furthermore, these current technologies have limited efficiency. Thus, a more efficient, thorough, and automated system and method of depleting high abundance proteins from a sample is still needed in order to obtain accurate analyses of diagnostically relevant plasma proteins.
Gene expression profiling of RNA extracted from peripheral blood or other biological fluids and tissues represents another promising method to identify biomarkers and to examine disease states and investigate immune responses. However, similar to plasma proteins, the relatively high proportion of globin messenger RNA transcripts present in total RNA extracted from whole blood can reduce the efficacy of microarray assays by interfering with the detection of less abundant gene transcripts. Current methods that attempt to pre-process the sample to selectively bind to and remove globin messenger RNA, and other highly abundant structural RNA transcripts that do not serve as biomarkers of interest, typically also suffer from problems of introducing handling artifacts, lack of standardized protocols and instrumentation, and extended processing times which prevent accurate analysis of the sample at the time of collection resulting in time-dependent changes in the sample.
Thus, there is a need in the medical diagnostics and biological tissue analysis fields to create an improved system and method for automated collection and processing of relevant particles of interest, and depletion of irrelevant particles not of interest, from blood or other biological fluid samples, including but not limited to urine, saliva, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cell lysates, and cell culture media. This invention provides such an improved system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
System for Automated Processing of Particles from Biological Fluid
As shown in
In particular the system 100 preferably facilitates isolation of diagnostically relevant particles such as proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids that are present in blood or other relevant fluid sample types (e.g., urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, plasma, tears, cell lysates, and cell culture media) by sorting particular particles with particular expression characteristics with the use of agents selectively bound to particular particles through antibodies or other specific recognition agents (e.g., proteins, ligands, receptors, enzymes, peptides, diabodies, fab fragments, aptamers, synthetic substances, peptibodies, nucleic acids, oligonucleotides). In alternative embodiments, the system 100 may be used to isolate nucleic acids using agents selectively bound to particular nucleic acids, including but not limited to DNA, RNA, or microRNA, such as for isolating DNA from specific cell types or isolating RNA for cell type-specific gene expression analysis. However, the system 100 can additionally or alternatively be used to isolate any suitable particles of interest by depletion of any suitable particles not of interest in the sample.
The preferred system 100 is preferably used at the point-of-care for clinical purposes including prognosis, diagnosis, and/or patient monitoring, but can additionally or alternatively be performed in a suitable research and/or laboratory environment, such as to enable clinician-scientists to process samples at the point-of-care in clinical trials and research. In some embodiments in which at least some of the sample 102 is returned to the patient for recirculation in the body of the patient, the system 100 can selectively isolate and remove specific proteins and/or other particles from the sample 102 of biological fluid, while returning the remaining processed fluid back to the patient. Furthermore, in some embodiments of the system 100, the system 100 can add a therapeutic agent to the returning fluid to help treat the patient by, for example, controlling administration of therapeutic agents on the basis of detected levels of particles present in the biological fluid of the patient. However, the system 100 can additionally or alternatively discard some or all of the sample.
The sampling module 110 functions to receive a sample 102 of biological fluid from the patient for analytical purposes. As shown in
As shown in
The sample transfer device of the sampling module no preferably functions to drive the sample 102 into the perturbing mechanism. The sample transfer device is preferably a tubing or a channel through which fluid may flow driven by a pressure source such as a dialysis roller pump, syringe pump or balloon, or vacuum tubing, but may alternatively be any suitable device or method that aids delivery of the sample 102 from the cannula to the perturbing mechanism. In some embodiments, the sampling module no additionally and/or alternatively functions to transport and prepare tagging agents such as immuno-modified beads in a solution, to maintain a solution of uniformly distributed tagging agents. The perturbing mechanism that prepares the tagging agents is preferably similar to the perturbing mechanism of the preferred embodiment that prepares the sample 102.
The preferred system 100 can include one or more microfluidic tagging conduits 120 that distinguish multiple particle types in the sample 102 from one another using tagging agents that selectively bind to particles, such as to distinguish targeted particles of interest from non-targeted particles that are not of interest. The tagging agents preferably include or are functionalized with antibodies that are specific to at least one selected particle type. For example, the tagging agents can be magnetic beads or other suitable tagging agents. The microfluidic tagging conduit 120 and/or tagging agents are preferably similar to that described in U.S. Patent Application 2011/0020459 entitled “Microfluidic method and system for isolating particles from biological fluid”, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. However, the microfluidic tagging conduit 120 and/or tagging agents can alternatively be any suitable kind of tagging conduit.
The first microfluidic particle depletion module 130 of the preferred system 100 preferably functions to remove cellular contaminants from a sample 102, but can additionally or alternatively function to remove any suitable particles not of interest from the sample 102. In particular, although the depletion module 130 is primarily described herein in terms of depleting cellular components from the sample, other variations of depletion module 130 in the preferred system 100 can additionally or alternatively deplete from the sample proteins, nucleic acids, or other particles not of interest. In a preferred embodiment, the depletion module 130 subjects the sample 102 to a force that separates a non-targeted sample component 106 of the sample 102 from a depleted sample component 104 the sample 102. The depletion module 130 preferably includes a microfluidic device that facilitates sedimentation. As shown in
The time required for complete sedimentation depends on various factors such as sedimentation rate and channel height. The sedimentation rate of a cell or other particle to be depleted in the sample 102 can be estimated using Stokes' settling equation, and depends on factors such as density of cells and the physical characteristics of the sample. For example, an erythrocyte with a diameter of 8 μm and a density of 1.12 g/cm3 in a blood sample with a density of 1.02 g/cm3 and a viscosity of 0.01 Pa-sec has a sedimentation rate of approximately 0.6 μm/s. As shown in
In a preferred variation, shown in
In a variation of the depletion module 130, the depletion module 130 alternatively and/or additionally includes a series of one or more filters through which the sample 102 flows. Each filter preferably has pores that are sized and/or shaped to selectively prevent passage of cellular contaminants as the sample 102 flows through the filter. Multiple filters placed in series may have pores of different sizes to progressively filter different sized and/or shaped cells. By trapping cellular contaminants and allowing passage of proteins and other components in the sample 102, the series of filters removes cellular contaminants from a sample 102.
The second depletion module 140 of the preferred system 100 preferably functions to separate proteins of interest from other proteins in the sample 102, but can additionally or alternatively function to separate any suitable particles of interest from other particles not of interest. In particular, although the depletion module 140 is primarily described in terms of depleting proteins not of interest in the sample 102, other variations of the depletion module 140 in the preferred system 100 can additionally or alternatively deplete from the sample nucleic acids or other particles not of interest. The depletion module 140 preferably includes a bead filled microfluidic chamber that is packed with immuno-modified beads or any suitable binding agents. The bead filled microfluidic chamber 142 preferably contains at least two openings that allow the sample to flow in and out of the microfluidic chamber, but may alternatively include any suitable number of openings. The sample 102 preferably flows over the immuno-modified beads trapped in the bead filled microfluidic chamber, and the immuno-modified beads selectively bind to proteins and capture the bound proteins in the bead filled microfluidic chamber. The immuno-modified beads are preferably specific to proteins not of interest in the sample 102, such that the immuno-modified beads deplete proteins not of interest in the sample 102, and allow the unbound proteins of interest to flow freely within the sample 102. However, the immuno-modified beads may alternatively be specific to proteins of interest to capture and isolate the proteins of interest from the sample 102. The bead filled microfluidic chamber may additionally and/or alternatively include functional groups on its surface that selectively bind and capture proteins.
In a first variation of the depletion module 140, the bead filled microfluidic chamber is preferably connected through channels to multiple peripheral sample holding microfluidic chambers 144 that hold the sample and surround the bead filled microfluidic chamber 142. As shown in
In a second variation of the depletion module 140′, the bead filled microfluidic chamber further includes actuated valves 152 that, when closed, contain the sample within the bead filled microfluidic chamber, and an actuated mixing mechanism 154 that induces mixing in the bead filled microfluidic chamber. This mixing preferably increases interaction between the proteins in the sample and immuno-modified beads 158, increases the potential for binding events to occur and increases the efficiency of protein isolation. The mixing is preferably turbulent, but can be any suitable degree of mixing. The bead filled microfluidic chamber preferably includes an outlet providing exit of the further depleted sample after a suitable amount of mixing with the beads, and can include one or more outlets providing exit of waste (e.g., with flushing of the chamber).
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In a fourth version of this variation, the bead filled microfluidic chamber preferably includes a movable magnet for providing a movable magnetic field (e.g., rotating external magnet) that induces flow of magnetic beads or other binding agents to interact through the received sample. In this version, the chamber is preferably a continuous circulating chamber similar to the second version of this variation, but can alternatively include any suitable chamber. The sample is preferably substantially stagnant relative to the induced movement of the magnetic beads (although the depletion module 140′ can include a rocker or other actuator to help prevent sedimentation of the sample) while the movable magnet “sweeps” the magnetic binding agents and captures particles specific to the magnetic binding agents. Alternatively, the depletion module 140′ can induce flow movement of both the sample and the magnetic binding agents.
In a first alternative of the depletion module 140″, the depletion module 140″ preferably includes a long, microfluidic channel that facilitates differential protein sorting based on density. As shown in
Similar to the depletion module 130, the microfluidic channel of the depletion module 140 may be subjected to a magnetic field that additionally and/or alternatively encourages directed movement of proteins not of interest (such as HAS and IgG) that are bound to magnetic and/or metallic microbeads or other tagging agents that are functionalized with CD31, another antibody, or any suitable binding agent. In particular, a magnetic field may direct magnetic or metallic microbead-bound proteins of interest downwards towards the second outlet, similar to the outlet for sedimented proteins, or the magnetic field may direct the magnetic or metallic microbead-bound proteins upwards toward the first outlet.
In a second alternative of the depletion module 140, the depletion module 140 alternatively and/or additionally includes a series of one or more filters 172 through which the sample flows. As shown in
Further variations and alternatives of the depletion module 140 include every combination and permutation of the described variations and alternatives of the depletion module 140 used in series, and may be tailored depending on the specific application.
An alternative embodiment of the system 100 further includes a nucleic acid isolation and analysis module and/or an intracellular protein isolation and analysis module that operates on and analyzes cellular samples. Cellular samples may be the result of cell depletion in the depletion module 130, or another suitable cell isolation system and/or process, preferably similar to that described in U.S. Patent Application 2011/0020459 entitled “Microfluidic method and system for isolating particles from biological fluid”, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The nucleic acid isolation and analysis module functions to extract DNA and/or RNA from selected cells for analysis. The intracellular protein isolation and analysis module functions to extract intracellular proteins from selected cells and to perform proteomic analysis on the extracted intracellular proteins. As a specific example, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that have been depleted from the sample in the depletion module 130 may have their gene expression analyzed for tumor grading. Thus, one could use the nucleic acid isolation and analysis module to extract and analyze DNA from CTCs to determine chemotherapy targets, and to use the cell protein isolation and analysis module to isolate proteins from within the CTCs that may be markers that are more specific than conventionally used tumor antigen.
Variations of the system 100 include every combination and permutation of the described variations of the depletion modules 130 and 140. The use of each module for a particular application depends on the type of sample and the kind of output desired. In further variations of the microfluidic system 100, the sequence in which the various modules are used may also be tailored towards the specific application of the system 100. The various microfluidic devices are preferably manufactured with soft lithography techniques. Soft lithography processes are known and used in the art of manufacturing microscale devices, and the implementation of soft lithography processes in the microfluidic device would be readily understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art. However, the microfluidic devices can additionally or alternatively be manufactured in any suitable manner.
Method for Automated Processing of Particles from Biological Fluid
As shown in
In particular, the method 200 preferably facilitates isolation of diagnostically relevant particles such as proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids that are present in blood or other relevant fluid sample types (e.g., urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, plasma, tears, cell lysates, and cell culture media) by sorting particular particles with particular expression characteristics with the use of agents selectively bound to particular particles through antibodies or other specific recognition agents (e.g., diabodies, fab fragments, aptamers, and oligonucleotides). In alternative embodiments, the method 200 can be used to isolate nucleic acids using agents selectively bound to particular nucleic acids, including but not limited to DNA, RNA, or microRNA, such as for isolating DNA from specific cell types or isolating RNA for cell type-specific gene expression analysis. However, the method 200 can additionally or alternatively be used to isolate any suitable particles of interest by depletion of any suitable particles not of interest in the sample.
The preferred method 200 is preferably used at the point-of-care for clinical purposes including prognosis, diagnosis, and/or patient monitoring, but can additionally or alternatively be performed in a research and/or laboratory environment, such as to enable clinician-scientists to process samples at the point-of-care in clinical trials and research. In some embodiments in which at least some of the sample 102 is returned to the patient for recirculation in the body of the patient, the method 200 can selectively isolate and remove specific proteins and/or other particles from the sample 102 of biological fluid, while returning the remaining processed fluid back to the patient. Furthermore, in some embodiments of the method 200 the method 200 can include adding a therapeutic agent to the returning fluid to help treat the patient by, for example, controlling administration of therapeutic agents on the basis of detected levels of particles present in the biological fluid of the patient. However, the method 200 can additionally or alternatively include discarding at least a portion of the sample.
Block S210 recites receiving a sample of biological fluid. Block S210 preferably functions to receive a sample of biological fluid for analytical purposes. The sample may be blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine, or any suitable bodily fluid. Receiving a sample S210 preferably includes receiving fluid from a catheter, needle, or any suitable cannula at the point-of-care of the patient, such as at bedside during in-patient care or the outpatient setting in patients with in-dwelling catheters or other cannulas. For example, a blood sample may be obtained through an arterial line, an intravenous line, a peripherally inserted central catheter, or a central line. As another example, a cerebrospinal fluid sample may be obtained through an external ventricular drain or a lumbar drain. As another example, a urine sample may be obtained through a Foley catheter or a suprapubic catheter. The process of sample collection from catheter or cannula to the microfluidic device can be further assisted by use of vacuum tubing and/or roller mechanisms that facilitate movement of the fluid through the catheter system rapidly to the microfluidic device. These and other fluid extraction methods are well known in the art, and any suitable method of obtaining bodily fluid may be performed. Alternatively, receiving a sample S210 can include receiving the sample from any suitable source, such as in research or laboratory applications. The sample is preferably heterogeneous in that it preferably includes particles of multiple sample particle types. For instance, a blood sample typically includes more populous cell types like erythrocytes and leukocytes, and may include rarer cell types like CTCs. Each sample particle type may further be classified as a targeted particle that is of interest or an untargeted particle that is not of interest, and its classification preferably depends on the specific application of the method 200.
Receiving a sample in block S210 preferably further includes obtaining a uniform distribution of particles in the sample. Obtaining a uniform distribution may include perturbing with a rocker mechanism that continuously, gently agitates the sample, with a rotating mechanism that continuously, gently turns the sample against gravity like a cement truck, or any suitable mechanism that shifts the sample enough to prevent sedimentation of cells in the sample and helps ensure a uniform particle distribution in the sample.
In some embodiments, the method 200 can include block S220, which recites tagging particles in the sample with tagging agents. The tagging agents preferably selectively bind to particles that enable labeling or distinguishing between different particle types. Block S220 is preferably similar to that described in U.S. Patent Application 2011/0020459 entitled “Microfluidic method and system for isolating particles from biological fluid”, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. However, the method 200 can include any suitable process for tagging any portion of particles in the sample.
Block S230 recites depleting at least a portion of the particles not of interest from the sample. Block S230 preferably functions to separate from the sample at least a portion of the particles not of interest from the sample. In a first preferred embodiment, block S230 includes subjecting the sample to a force that separates at least a portion of the particles not of interest from the sample. In a first variation, Block S230 preferably includes facilitating sedimentation of particles not of interest (e.g., cellular contaminants) in the sample. Facilitating sedimentation of particles not of interest preferably includes passing the sample through a long, generally straight microfluidic channel device, but may alternatively include passing the sample through any suitable microfluidic volume that allows sedimentation of particles in the sample as the sample passes through the microfluidic volume. In one variation, facilitating sedimentation of particles not of interest may further include increasing sedimentation rate by binding Von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, CD31 functionalized beads, or any suitable binding agent to some or all particles not of interest to form larger combined masses that have a faster sedimentation rate. Block S230 may additionally and/or alternatively include tagging particles with magnetic and/or metallic microbeads or other tagging agents and applying a magnetic field to the microfluidic channel device to selectively direct movement of the tagged particles in a particular direction to separate the particles not of interest in the sample from the rest of the sample.
In a second preferred embodiment, Block S230 includes passing the sample through a chamber filled with binding agents specific to selected proteins or other particles and inducing sample recirculation in the chamber. While passing the sample through a chamber filled with binding agents, the binding agents preferably bind to proteins or other particles not of interest in the sample and allow particles of interest to remain unbound and free to flow with the sample. Alternatively, the binding agents may bind to particles of interest in the sample to capture and isolate particles of interest in the sample. The binding agents are preferably immuno-modified beads, but may alternatively be any suitable binding agent. Inducing sample recirculation in the chamber increases the occurrence of binding events between the binding agents and selected particles in the chamber. In one preferred embodiment, the sample recirculation is preferably performed by facilitating repeated flow sample into and out of the chamber. In another preferred embodiment, the sample recirculation is preferably additionally and/or alternatively be performed by inducing mixing within a microfluidic chamber sealable with actuated valves or any suitable mechanism. For example, the sample can be circulated through a continuous volume over a constrained volume of binding agents to capture specific particles, or binding agents can be circulated (e.g., magnetic binding agents controlled by a magnet) over a constrained volume of the sample. In another example, block S230 includes inducing circulating flow of both the sample and the volume of binding agents.
In a third preferred embodiment, Block S230 alternatively and/or additionally includes filtering particles in the sample. Filtering particles in the sample is preferably performed by passing the sample through a series of filters, each of which includes pores that are sized and/or shaped to selectively prevent passage of cells, proteins and/pr other particles not of interest as the sample passes through the filter. The sample preferably flows through filters with progressively smaller pores, to deplete the sample of progressively smaller particles, but may flow through the filters in any suitable order. The filters are additionally and/or alternatively constructed from selected materials and/or in selected processes to further filter the sample based on lipid solubility or ionic charge, such as ion exchange membranes similar to diffusion dialysis membranes known by those of ordinary skill in the art.
As shown in
Variations of the preferred method 200 include every combination and permutation of any variations of receiving a sample in block S210, tagging particles in the sample with tagging agents in block S220, depleting at least a portion of the particles not of interest from the sample in block S230, and recirculating at least a portion of the sample in block S250. The performance of each process for a particular application depends on the type of sample and the kind of output desired.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/411,482, filed 20 Apr. 2011, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61477482 | Apr 2011 | US |