This document pertains generally, but not by way of limitation, to microfluidic devices and methods of fabrication thereof.
Lab-on-chip (“LOC”) microfluidic devices, in which a sample is analyzed in a single device or chip, have been optimized for a variety of applications including, for example, immunoassays, enzyme assays, the polymerase chain reaction, DNA analysis and sequencing, protein separation and single cell analysis. The microfluidic devices have been improved through incremental improvements focused on reducing analysis time, reagents consumed and sample volumes required. Recently, attention has been devoted to integrating sample preparation processes onto the microfluidic challenges to further improve the effectiveness and applicability of the microfluidic devices. However, integrating sample preparation in the microfluidic architecture requires isolating the preparation reagents from the analytical reagents during storage before selectively releasing the reagents to combine with the sample during sample preparation or analysis. As such, valves must be included in the microfluidic architecture to facilitate the selective movement of reagents within the microfluidic devices.
LOC microfluidic devices typically comprise a substrate in which the microfluidic architecture is printed, etched, molded or otherwise formed. The substrate typically comprises a polymeric material to reduce manufacturing and material costs. Currently, poly-dimethyl-siloxane (“PDMS”) is a preferred polymer for the substrate as multiple microfluidic devices can be quickly replicated from a template through a lithography process without the use of a clean room. Similarly, the elastomeric and hydrophobic properties of PDMS facilitate the use of mechanical and geometrically capillary valves. However, PDMS cannot be used for many routine biological and chemical assays as PDMS can be easily mechanically deformed, cause instability of surface treatments, gas permeability issues and absorb small hydrophobic molecules.
Alternate polymeric substrate materials include thermoplastics, such as Poly(ethylene terephthalate)-Toner (PeT), for which existing industrial fabrication processes such as multi-layer lamination, embossing and injection molding provide reduced production costs and improved production reliability. Unlike PDMS, the process for forming a PeT polymeric substrate having the appropriate microfluidic architecture involves printing a mirror image of the microfluidic architecture on a polyester film with a hydrophobic toner. A blank transparency film or a mirror printed sheet is then laminated on the first printed sheet, wherein the unprinted portions define the microfluidic architecture.
However, unlike PDMS microfluidic devices, integrating valving into the microfluidic architecture of PeT microfluidic devices is particularly difficult. The PeT substrate can be flimsy and easily damaged making it difficult to bond the elastomeric membranes necessary for mechanically-driven active valves without damaging the substrate. Similarly, non-mechanical active valves, such as phase-change valves, can malfunction due to being damaged by the heat and pressure applied during the final lamination step. In addition, both mechanically-driven and non-mechanical active valves require embedding of a different barrier material into the substrate, which can further complicate the fabrication process. In addition, active valves generally require an energy input to operate the valve increasing the complexity of the operation and decreasing the portability of the PeT microfluidic devices. Passive valves, such as geometrical capillary valves, only require sufficient driving force to overcome the surface tension of the liquid where the dimensions of the channel expand. However, the operational band pressure is determined by the aspect ratio of the channel structures, which are limited in PeT substrates by constraints of the lamination fabrication process making manipulation of liquid delivery difficult.
Although PeT substrates are often substantially less costly manufacture than PDMS and have certain advantageous material properties, the inability to integrate effective valving into the PeT substrate hinders the applications and effectiveness of PeT devices.
The present inventors have recognized, among other things, that a problem to be solved can include the inability to control the flow of fluid through the microfluidic networks of microfluidic devices employing thermoplastics such as PeT. In an example, the present subject matter can provide a solution to this problem, such as by printing toner patches in fluid channels of a chip of a microfluidic device. The toner patches can comprise hydrophobic toner to apply inertial pressure to fluids travelling through the channels. The density of hydrophobic toner and the dimensions of the toner patch can be varied to alter the inertial pressure applied to the fluid. External pressure can be applied to overcome the inertial pressure created by the toner patch to push fluids past the toner patch. In an example, the chip can be rotated about a rotational axis to apply external pressure to fluids sufficient to overcome the inertial pressure created by the toner patch to push fluid past the toner patch. In certain examples, the external pressure can be applied by a syringe pump, electro-osomotic flow and headspace pressure from expanding gases or liquids. The external pressure can be positive pressure or a negative pressure from a vacuum drawing the fluid through the channel. The rotational speed of the chip can be varied to facilitate movement of fluid through the channels and to push fluid past the hydrophobic toner patches.
A laminate chip, according to an example, can include a bottom transparency film having a top surface having a toner patch printed thereon and a channel layer defining at least one elongated channel opening and having a toner bottom coat printed thereon. The bottom transparency film layer can be laminated to the bottom toner coat such that the channel opening and top surface cooperate to define a channel for receiving fluid, wherein the toner patch is aligned with the channel to create a hydrophobic region within the channel applying inertial pressure to fluid in the channel preventing fluid flow past the toner patch. The laminate chip can be rotatable to create external pressure on fluid received within the channel in excess to the inertial pressure to push the fluid past the hydrophobic region.
A method of fabricating a laminate chip, according to an example can include printing a toner patch on a top surface of a bottom transparency film layer and printing a bottom toner coat onto a channel layer. The method can further include ablating at least one channel opening in the channel layer. The method can also include laminating the bottom transparency film layer to the bottom toner coat of the channel layer such that the top surface of the bottom transparency film layer and the channel opening cooperate to define a channel, wherein the toner patch is positioned within the channel.
A method of controlling fluid flow through a laminate chip, according to an example, can include providing a channel layer including elongated channel opening and a bottom toner coat and laminating a bottom transparency film layer having a toner patch to the bottom toner coat to define a channel, wherein the toner patch is positioned within the elongated channel. The toner patch can comprise a hydrophobic toner. The method can further comprise administering fluid into the channel. The toner patch can create inertial pressure on the fluid preventing the fluid from passing the toner patch. The method can also include rotating the laminate chip about a rotational axis to exert an external pressure on the fluid in excess of a predetermined threshold to overcome the inertial pressure to push the fluid past the toner patch.
This overview is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the present subject matter. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
cos θToner patch=f1(cos θToner−cos θTransparency film)+cos θTransparency film
where f1 (0≦f1≦1) is the fractional area of exposed toner-coated surface; cos θTransparency film is the contact angle of the liquid on uncoated transparency film; cos θToner is the contact angle of the liquid on fully coated transparency film; and cos θToner patch is the contact angle of the liquid on the resulting toner patch 32. In an example, the toner patch 32 and a cooperating additional toner patch 40 can have the same fractional area coverage to have uniform hydrophobicity. In another example, the toner patch 32 and the toner patch 40 can have different fractional area coverage to have different hydrophobicity.
As also depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
In operation, as illustrated in
where γ is the surface tension of the fluid; w is the channel width; h is the channel height; and cos θToner is the contact angle along the sidewall of the channel.
The hydrophobic valve created by the toner patch 32 prevents flow of fluid through the channel until the pressure of the fluid exceeds the inertial pressure created by the toner patch 32. The capillary pressure generated by the fluid column is a function of the channel dimensions and can be expressed by:
where ρ is the density of the fluid; g is the gravitational acceleration and H is the height of the fluid column. In an example, the dimensions and density of the toner patch 32 is such that the inertial pressure created by created by the toner patch 32 is at least greater than the capillary pressure such that without additional outside pressure the toner patch 32 will restrict fluid flow through the channel.
In an example, external pressure can be generated by applying pressure to the fluid through a syringe pump or from headspace pressure from expanding gases or liquids. The external pressure created can be positive pressure pushing the fluid past the hydrophobic valve or negative pressure drawing the fluid past the hydrophobic valve. In an example, an electrical potential can be applied to the laminate chip 20 to induce electro-osmotic flow within the channel to create sufficient external pressure to overcome the inertial pressure generated by the hydrophobic valves.
In an example, external pressure can be generated by rotating the laminate chip 20 about a rotational axis, wherein the channel is oriented to extend radially outward from the rotational axis. The centrifugal force from the rotation of the laminate chip 20 creates external pumping pressure on the fluid within the channel such that the overall pressure of the fluid reaches a burst pressure that exceeds the inertial pressure of the hydrophobic valve. The pumping pressure generated by rotation of the laminate chip is a function of the distance of the fluid from the center of the rotational axis and can be expressed by:
where ω is the angular velocity of the rotating the laminate chip; R1 is the initial distance of the fluid from the rotational axis; R2 is the final distance of the fluid from the rotational axis; ΔR is equal to R2−R1; and is equal to (R2+R1)/2. The burst pressure is a function of the toner patch characteristics and the geometry of the channel and can be expressed for a channel having a uniform width and depth, by:
The necessary rotational frequency necessary to provide flow through across the toner patch 32 can be expressed by:
In an example, the dimensions and density of the toner patch 32 can be selected to have an inertial pressure exceeding the capillary pressure by a predetermined amount requiring a minimum rotational speed to generate a predetermined pumping pressure to push fluid past the hydrophobic valve. As discussed further below, in certain examples, the laminate chip 20 can comprise a plurality of toner patches 32 each having different dimensions and densities to provide selective fluid flow the various hydrophobic valves.
As depicted in
In an example, the toner patch for the hydrophobic valve 50A of the first branch 44A can have a different dimension and/or density from the toner patch for the hydrophobic valve 50B of the second branch 44B. In this configuration, the laminate chip 42 can be rotated at a first rotational speed corresponding to the first hydrophobic valve 50A to allow fluid to enter the mixing chamber 46 from the first branch 44A. The laminate chip 42 can then be rotated at a second rotational speed corresponding to the second hydrophobic valve 50B to allow fluid to enter the mixing chamber 46 from the second branch 44B. In this configuration, the order, rate and other characteristics of the mixing of fluids from the branches 44A, 44B into the mixing chamber 46 can controlled by varying the rotational speed of the laminate chip 20. In certain examples, the toner patch for the hydrophobic valve 50A of the first branch 44A can have the same dimensions and/or density as the toner patch for the hydrophobic valve 50B of the second branch 44B. In this configuration, the branches 44A, 44B can simultaneously feed fluid into the mixing chamber 46. In certain examples, the laminate chip 42 can include a plurality of branches having combinations of hydrophobic valves having varying effective rotational speeds for controlling mixing of fluids in the mixing chamber 46.
As also depicted in
As also depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As illustrated in
Each of these non-limiting examples can stand on its own, or can be combined in any permutation or combination with any one or more of the other examples.
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the present subject matter can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” Such examples can include elements in addition to those shown or described. However, the present inventors also contemplate examples in which only those elements shown or described are provided. Moreover, the present inventors also contemplate examples using any combination or permutation of those elements shown or described (or one or more aspects thereof), either with respect to a particular example (or one or more aspects thereof), or with respect to other examples (or one or more aspects thereof) shown or described herein.
In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and any documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In this document, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, composition, formulation, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
Method examples described herein can be machine or computer-implemented at least in part. Some examples can include a computer-readable medium or machine-readable medium encoded with instructions operable to configure an electronic device to perform methods as described in the above examples. An implementation of such methods can include code, such as microcode, assembly language code, a higher-level language code, or the like. Such code can include computer readable instructions for performing various methods. The code may form portions of computer program products. Further, in an example, the code can be tangibly stored on one or more volatile, non-transitory, or non-volatile tangible computer-readable media, such as during execution or at other times. Examples of these tangible computer-readable media can include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description as examples or embodiments, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment, and it is contemplated that such embodiments can be combined with each other in various combinations or permutations. The scope of the present subject matter should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This patent application claims the benefit of priority, under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e), to James P. Landers et al. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/885,328, entitled “RAPID AND DIRECT PATTERNING OF HYDROPHOBIC VALVES ON DISPOSABLE MICROCHIPS BY LASER PRINTER LITHOGRAPHY AND RELATED METHOD THEREOF,” filed on Oct. 1, 2013 (Attorney Docket No. 01973-01), which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61885328 | Oct 2013 | US |