None.
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of flow and noise control in an incompressible and/or compressible fluid. More specifically, the invention comprises the use of microjets to reduce noise caused by air flowing over an open cavity such as a sunroof opening or an open window in an automobile.
2. Description of the Related Art
Modern automobiles are designed to provide smooth airflow over their exterior surfaces. Careful design has resulted in a substantial reduction in interior noise—even at highway speeds. Passengers are now accustomed to a relatively quiet environment in which music may be clearly heard and voice communications over cellular telephones are routine. This low ambient noise level is lost, however, when a window or sunroof is opened.
The flow phenomena occurring across an open sunroof and an open window are grossly similar. A sunroof therefore makes a good general example.
The discrete frequencies produced are likely created by a flow-induced resonance phenomenon. Air flowing over the automobile's exterior tends to lift free from the surface at leading edge 26 of opening 24. The air coming from the leading edge is commonly referred to as a shear layer which separates from the leading edge of the opening and begins to roll up into large-scale rotating structures due to the well-known Kelvin-Helmholtz instability mechanism. When these structures strike the trailing edge of the opening, strong acoustic waves are generated. Under the appropriate conditions, the flow becomes self-excited and significant amplification results.
The present invention comprises a method and associated devices for reducing the noise produced by an open cavity within a moving automobile. Exemplary open cavities include open sunroofs and open windows. The invention proposes placing microjet orifices proximate the open cavity. These inject small but rapidly moving columns of air into the prevailing flow. The projected columns reduce the formation of large coherent structures in the prevailing flow. As these large structures are a critical component of the resonance which is responsible for much of the noise produced across the open cavity, the overall noise level is reduced by the microjets. The microjets can also reduce the overall drag created by an open cavity.
The present invention proposes to locate a plurality of microjet orifices in proximity to a selectively opened cavity in an automobile. Examples of such a selectively opened cavity include windows and sunroofs. The microjets can be placed in any suitable position according to the requirements of the particular application. However, those skilled in the art will know that air flow over the external surfaces of a moving automobile moves in only one principal direction. Thus, the microjets will typically be located just upstream or in the vicinity of the cavity in question.
Pressure source 32 feeds pressurized air to the microjet. One or more valves 30 can be provided to control the flow. The valve may be a discrete on/off type or throttling type. The pressure source preferably supplies air between about 2 psig and 30 psig, although different ranges maybe desirable dependant upon specific automobile configuration. This is a relatively low pressure that can be accommodated using inexpensive conduits, fittings, and valves. The source of the pressure can be a mechanical compressor driven by a serpentine belt on the vehicle's engine, an electrical compressor powered by the vehicle's electrical system, or other known pressure sources.
The microjet orifice itself serves as a small expansion nozzle. A typical size is a diameter of 400 micrometers, or about 0.016 inches. The typical range of size is from about 200 micrometers to about 1 mm. The microjet is configured to project a very rapidly moving column of flow into the prevailing airflow. Because of the high momentum of this rapidly moving air the column will persist for a significant distance away from the surface where the microjet orifice is located. This phenomenon creates a “finger” of upward moving air which splits the incoming flow and forces it to flow around the column. The result is a generation of voritcity (rotating flow) and significant disruption in the formation of large scale coherent structures which are a critical component of the resonance that tends to produce the annoying low frequency noise.
The microjet orifice itself may have a smoothly contoured shape (such as a DeLaval expansion profile), or it may have a simpler profile including straight side walls. The input stagnation pressure to each microjet or array of microjets is preferably controlled within a reasonable variation. As one example—suited to a particular application—the stagnation pressure could be controlled within a tolerance of about 7 kPa or 1 psi. The microjet is shown in
In most applications it will be preferable to provide two or more microjets arranged in an array proximate the leading edge of the opening.
The microjets are optionally grouped into two or more subsets within the array. Each subset can have its own flow control and regulation so that individual subsets may be throttled or simply switched on and off.
The microjet orifices can be combined with other passive or active flow control techniques to further refine the invention.
In
Using the present invention, a dramatic reduction in noise is possible. Typical cavity noise in a moving vehicle peaks in the range of 10-30 Hz. A crude proof-of-concept model using the present invention has demonstrated a reduction greater than 10 decibels in this frequency range. Much more improvement is likely possible by refining the design and configuring it to suit each cavity to which it is applied.
Of course, in addition to the noise reduction, the microjets can likely be used to reduce drag over an open cavity. The noise produced in the absence of the microjets represents unsteady flow and generally increased drag. Using the microjets smoothes the flow and actually reduces the drag. Thus, the microjets may offer a performance advantage as well (depending on whether the drag reduction will offset the amount of energy required to pressurize the air).
The foregoing description and drawings comprise illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Having thus described exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it should be noted by those skilled in the art that the within disclosures are exemplary only, and that various other alternatives, adaptations, and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention. Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings.
This application is a non-provisional application claiming the benefit (pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.53(c) of an earlier-filed provisional application. The patent application was filed on Feb. 22, 2010 and was assigned application Ser. No. 61/338,627. The parent application listed the same inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3259065 | Ross et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3261576 | Valyi | Jul 1966 | A |
3529862 | Jousserandot | Sep 1970 | A |
4160494 | McCambridge | Jul 1979 | A |
4353587 | Brenholt | Oct 1982 | A |
4375898 | Stephens | Mar 1983 | A |
5374098 | Nelson | Dec 1994 | A |
5544931 | Nelson | Aug 1996 | A |
6086146 | Nabuurs | Jul 2000 | A |
6276636 | Krastel | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6378932 | Fasel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6637805 | Rees | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6779834 | Keller | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20010035662 | Pike et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20060290169 | Fukushima et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080157561 | Farber | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090256387 | Pfertner et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100078963 | Dittrich et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110203673 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61338627 | Feb 2010 | US |