Spherical polymer microspheres can be mass produced with extraordinary precision and low cost. Many uses for these microspheres have been developed that rely on the specific binding of a microsphere to a target, and the labelling of the polymer microsphere with various dyes or magnetic material.
Spherical glass lenses greater than 1 mm in diameter are used for coupling light into or out of fibers as well as for relaying images across a short distance.
The present application describes new optical applications of spherical polymer microspheres less than 10 microns in diameter.
The present application teaches a special microlensing particle and applications of the particle. According to the present invention, a latex microsphere of diameter 0.3 μm-4 μm is obtained. Latex microspheres of this type are commercially available and have been used in pregnancy tests and other applications that do not exploit their optical properties.
According to the present system, the latex microsphere is preferably less than 10 μm in diameter, more preferably 1 to 2 μm in diameter. The latex microsphere is used in combination with an optical imaging element.
Applications of the latex microsphere include a micro lensing rotational probe for use in detecting high frequency rotational motion, a scanning microscope, and a diode laser collimator device.
These and other aspects will now be described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It was found by the present inventors that the latex sphere has a collimating effect on incoming light. Incoming light 110 is collimated by the sphere into collimated light 120. The collimated light can be used for various purposes described herein.
A first embodiment is used to sense high frequency rotational motion. An asymmetric fluorescent probe is formed of a microsphere pair 199 as shown in FIG. 2A. The probe includes a first latex microsphere 200 in optical and physical contact with a second latex microsphere 210. The first microsphere 200 is approximately 1.1 μm in diameter and forms a lensing portion. The smaller microsphere 210, which can be between 0.5 um and 1 um, is fluorescently-labeled. The larger microsphere 200 acts as a lens that enhances the collection efficiency of the optical system.
The two microspheres are connected together. Light is passed by the optical combination of the two spheres.
When the microsphere pair 199 is oriented relative to the photodetector 225 as shown in
The angles of ray tracing are outlined in FIG. 2A. The exit angle φ′−θ″ can be calculated as a function of the incident angle θ. The fluorescent microsphere 210 is approximated as a point particle located a distance δ from the lensing microsphere. Using geometry, it can be seen that
φ′=π−(π2θ′+φ)=2θ′−φ
Applying Snell's law at the top interface of the lensing microsphere:
Then, direct substitution of equation (3) into equation (2), shows that
θ″=φ+θ
Using the law of sines, this can be rewritten as
Finally, the exit angle φ′−θ″ can be written in terms of the original angle θ, the radii of the two spheres, r, δ, and the indices of refraction, n1 and n2.
For δ<<t, φ<<θ. The exit angle is then given by
Typical realizable values of n1 and n2 are for water, n1=1.3 and polystyrene, n2=1.59. For small θ, the equation above reduces to
This gives an exit angle of 0.64·θ for a ray entering at an angle θ. Since the exit angle is always less than the original angle, the lensing microsphere focuses rays from the fluorescent microspheres and enhances the optical signal.
The enhancement in the observed optical signal also depends on the numerical aperture of the objective. The numerical aperture (NA) is defined as NA=n sin θ0, where θ0 is the collection angle. For the present objective (20x, 0.4 NA) in air θ0=23.60. The equation shows that the focusing microsphere increases the angle of collection to 43.5°. This corresponds to an effective NA of 0.69. The epi-fluorescent intensity in proportional to NA4, so the intensity enhancement should relate (0.69/0.4)4≈9 times.
The rate of change indicates the rate of rotation of the pair 199.
The above has described one embodiment of these miniature lenses, but other applications are also possible.
The light reflected from the surface, shown as 425, produces an output 430 which is collimated when the microsphere is directly above the surface area being imaged.
The microlens enhances the numerical aperture of the objective 440 of the microscope 438. This enables the microscope to have a high numerical aperture combined with a long working distance. Such a microscope avoids the usual trade off between light collecting capability (numerical aperture) and working distance.
In one mode, the microlens 100 can actually be smaller than the wavelength of light that is used. This allows the microscope to resolve at a resolution that is higher than the diffraction limit of the radiation.
Another application of the microlens is shown in FIG. 5. Diode lasers are often small devices which produce a laser output over a very small scale. The laser output is often Gaussian.
A diode laser relies on two mirrors shown as 500 and 502 to form a lasing cavity 504. The present embodiment attaches microlens 506 directly on the output mirror 500. This helps collimate the laser beam 510. Moreover, since the laser itself is often on the order of size of 10 μm. a microscopic lens can help collimate almost all of the output light from the laser while minimally adding to the size of the laser.
In the embodiments of
Other modifications are contemplated.
This application is a Division of 09/441,152 Nov. 12, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,614,598 which claims the benefit of the U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/108,385, filed on Nov. 12, 1998.
The work described in this application was supported by Grant No. PHY97-22417 awarded by the National Science Foundation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4155962 | Mohn et al. | May 1979 | A |
4540534 | Grendol | Sep 1985 | A |
4798428 | Karim et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5171995 | Gast et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5317452 | Prentiss et al. | May 1994 | A |
5583351 | Brown et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5729393 | Lee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5764613 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776191 | Mazzocco | Jul 1998 | A |
5815306 | Sheridon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5939709 | Ghislain et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6181478 | Mandella | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200737 | Walt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236513 | Mallary | May 2001 | B1 |
6270696 | Jain et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277545 | Iida et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298026 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301055 | Legrand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307689 | Ichimura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6369957 | Ishida | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6548171 | Barbera-Guillem et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560030 | Legrand et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6608726 | Legrand et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614598 | Quake et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6781690 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20030032204 | Walt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030076649 | Speakman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 362 993 | Apr 1990 | EP |
08-001810 | Jan 1996 | JP |
11 197587 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-89004 | Mar 2000 | JP |
WO 9819654 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60108385 | Nov 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09441152 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 10603502 | US |