Micromesh heating material and food packages made therefrom

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6188055
  • Patent Number
    6,188,055
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 21, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 13, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A microwave heating material is formed of a micromesh conductive coating on a substrate. The micromesh includes a plurality of closely spaced, fine lines of a conductive material such as aluminum. The conductive material may have a resistivity of about 1-50 Ω/□. The microwave heating material may include electrically and physically discontinuous islands of micromesh, each of which may optionally be connected to another only by a susceptor fuse region. The microwave heating material is laminated to a supporting material which may be incorporated into wraps, bags, boxes, trays, and other food containers.
Description




BACKGROUND




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates generally to the field of electromagnetically excited heating materials and articles made therefrom, particularly those used in food packaging for improving the cooking, heating or browning of food in microwave ovens.




2. Related Art




Microwave heating materials have been in use and described in publications for over twenty years. An example of a microwave heating material is a microwave susceptor constructed of a coating on a film or substrate in which the coating absorbs microwave energy, converts it into heat and conducts the heat generated into food articles placed in close proximity thereto. Microwave susceptors are particularly useful in microwave food packaging to aid in browning or crisping those foods.




The field of microwave susceptor packaging technology includes numerous attempts to optimize heating, browning and crisping of food cooked in microwave ovens. Such attempts include German Patent Number 2,160,924 issued 1971, which first described a food wrap using a carbon or metal coated material to achieve browning and crisping in a microwave oven. Later, U.S. Pat. No. 3,783,220 describes a plate or fixture which uses either carbon fibers or semiconducting coatings such as tin oxide to produce browning and crisping temperatures in a microwave oven. Yet more recently, U.S. Pat. No. 4,267,420, issued May 1981, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,005, issued February 1987, describe substantially similar structures of either semiconductor coatings or thin metallic coatings on thin film substrates such as polyester.




One feature common to all of the above-mentioned conventional technology is the randomness of the electric fields which are generated by a microwave oven in the vicinity of these structures. Ultimately, corresponding, randomly directed eddy currents flowing in a resistive coating such as aluminum generate heat.




Heating in a susceptor material is achieved through so-called “I


2


R” losses in the material. Power dissipation P in a resistive material having a resistance R is a function of current I, where P≈I


2


R. The power dissipation P in microwave susceptor material occurs in the form of heat. The current I is the eddy current generated by microwave energy impinging on the susceptor material, while the resistance R is the resistance of the susceptor material through which the current I flows.




A more recent article disclosed by the present inventor in U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,187, issued May 1995 employs a pattern of metal which is physically discontinuous, forming fuses. The fuse patterns create a self-limiting heat source, such that when too much energy is absorbed by a particular region, the fuse breaks between adjacent susceptor areas and the heating effect is mitigated.




However, all of the most recent susceptors discussed above, have a tendency to develop random cracks and crazing of the conductive coating. This problem is thought to be due to distortion of the substrate film resulting from excess heating. Furthermore, in conventional susceptors the eddy currents are free to flow in a completely random and non-oriented fashion, as noted earlier.




The only conventional susceptors found by this inventor to be commercially viable for use in microwave oven heating applications are those which are made with thin layers of aluminum typically exhibiting a range of 75-125 Ω/□ or about 0.25 optical density. Heavier thicknesses of aluminum, for instance, have been found not to provide the browning and crisping temperatures desired while frequently causing fires due to severe arcing. Thinner layers of aluminum generally do not present a fire hazard, but produce an insufficient temperature rise for the intended purpose.




However, customers for microwave food heating products routinely request faster heat production and production of higher temperature rises. No conventional solutions have proven commercially viable or technically feasible.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention solves the problems noted above, providing higher temperatures at a faster rate, safely. The present invention also provides a structure which is more easily tuned at time of manufacture for specific customer temperature requirements. Other advantages of the present invention will be recognized by those skilled in this art upon reading this disclosure.




My invention is a thin high resolution micromesh of microwave absorbing, electrically conductive coating deposited on a substrate suitable for use in a microwave oven to produce browning and crisping, as well as improved heating characteristics. Such a micromesh may, for example, be formed of 1-50 Ω/□ vapor deposited aluminum and have a line resolution of between about 20 and 200 lines per inch. Preferred line resolutions tend to lie between about 75 and 100 lines per inch. Temperature rises produced by this structure have exceeded a standard susceptor device by 25% or more. Furthermore, the heat generated per unit time is also greater. Surprisingly, the measured reflection/transmission/absorption (RTA) of the invented material has been readily tuned to be around 25% reflection, 25% transmission and 50% absorption. As described in Charles R. Buffler,


Microwave Cooking and Processing


, Van Nostrand & Reinhold, 1993, these are the values of a hypothetical ideal susceptor material. Not only does this material outperform conventional susceptor materials, but it can be cost effectively produced.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed in connection with the Figures. Like reference numerals indicate like elements in the figures, in which:





FIG. 1A

is a cross sectional view of a susceptor heating material made in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the cross-section taken along line


1


A—


1


A of FIG.


1


B.





FIG. 1B

is a plan view of a susceptor material made in accordance with the aspect shown in cross-section if

FIG. 1A

of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a partial perspective view of another embodiment of a susceptor material made in accordance with another aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of a row of food wrap made in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view of a microwave food bag made in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of a microwave food box made in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of a microwave food tray made in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of a susceptor material made in accordance with another aspect of the invention; and





FIGS. 8

,


9


and


10


are plan views of patterns in which the embodiment of

FIG. 7

may be formed.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention will be better understood in view of the following detailed description of various embodiments thereof, read in connection with the figures.




The invention is now generally described in connection with

FIGS. 1A and 1B

. The micromesh


101


of one embodiment of the present invention is formed of a metal vapor deposited onto a substrate film


103


and then laminated either to a thicker plastic, paper, paperboard, or cellulose supporting material


105


. The laminate can then be used to wrap foods or can be formed by conventional techniques into the shape of a food container.




The micromesh


101


may be produced by a variety of techniques known in the art. For example, the micromesh maybe formed of a metallic layer which has been vapor deposited or plated onto the substrate


103


. After vapor deposition or plating a full coverage metal layer, the metal layer maybe etched to form micromesh


101


. An alternate and preferred method of forming the micromesh


101


is the pattern metallization method disclosed in detail in Walters et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,187, issued May 2, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference. By the pattern metallized printing method disclosed therein, the micromesh


101


is directly formed by vapor deposition on the substrate


103


.




An embodiment of the invention has been described in which the micromesh


101


is formed of a metal. However, other conductive materials may be used. For example, semiconducting materials and tin oxide are suitable. When a metal is used to form micromesh 01, a 1-50 Ω/□ layer of aluminum is preferred. Metals are preferred over non-metals for use in connection with the present invention because of their low cost and compatibility with the preferred method of making the material. Suitable metals include, in addition to aluminum, iron, tin, tungsten, nickel, stainless steel, titanium, magnesium, copper and chromium or alloys thereof. Oxides or partial oxides of some of these metals may also be suitable conductive materials.




The substrate


103


carrying the micromesh structure


101


is then laminated to a paper, paperboard, cellulose or other suitable supporting material


105


. Usually, the laminate will be formed with the micromesh structure


101


disposed between the substrate


103


and the supporting material


105


. This affords the micromesh structure


101


protection against abrasion or direct food contact.




In another embodiment of the invention, shown in

FIG. 2

, the susceptor area of a food package is covered by electrically and physically isolated islands


201


of metallic micromesh structure


101


. Channels


203


of area not having metal deposited thereon separate each island


201


from another.




Typical applications of the micromesh structure described above include food wraps, bags, boxes and trays as shown in

FIGS. 3-6

.





FIG. 3

shows a roll of food wrap material


301


, formed in accordance with the present invention. In this embodiment, the entire food wrap material


301


is composed of or covered by susceptor material


100


including a substrate


103


carrying a conductive micromesh structure


101


as described above in connection with

FIGS. 1A and 1B

. The wrap may include a supporting material


105


of, for example, paper. Such a material may be wrapped around an arbitrarily shaped food item and placed in a microwave oven for overall surface browning or crisping. The complete structure, including the substrate


103


, the supporting material


105


and the micromesh structure


103


, will generally have the micromesh structure disposed between the substrate


101


and the supporting material


105


for protection as described above.




Prepackaged food items may be provided in bags, such as shown in

FIG. 4

or boxes, such as shown in FIG.


5


. The bag


401


of

FIG. 4

shows another use of micromesh susceptor material, such as shown in

FIGS. 1A

,


1


B and


2


. Supporting material


105


may be flexible paper or plastic material suitable for use in food bags. Substrates


103


having the micromesh structure


101


formed thereon are laminated to selected portions of supporting material


105


. The complete structure, including the substrate


101


, the supporting material


105


and the micromesh structure


103


, will generally have the micromesh structure disposed between the substrate


101


and the supporting material


105


for protection as described above. A food article may occupy the interior space


403


between susceptor areas


100


. In the box


501


of the

FIG. 5

, a susceptor area


100


may be provided in a base portion of a box. The box may be formed of a suitable supporting material


105


for susceptor substrate


103


and micromesh structure


101


, such as paperboard.




Finally as shown in

FIG. 6

a paperboard supporting structure


105


carrying susceptor substrate


103


having disposed thereon micromesh structure


101


may be formed into a microwaveable food browning tray. Alternatively, supporting material


105


may be plastic or another microwave and food compatible material. As in the above-described structures, the complete structure, including the substrate


103


, the supporting material


105


and the micromesh structure


101


, will generally have the micromesh structure disposed between the substrate


101


and the supporting material


105


for protection as described above.




It is preferred for all the forgoing and other food contact applications that substrate


103


is formed of a 12 μm thick film of polyester. However, other substrates may be used which exhibit microwave transparency, heat tolerance and compatibility with food products. Materials which have been found suitable for use in the substrate include polyethyleneteraphathalate (PET), polyethylenenaphthalate (PEN), polycarbonate, nylon, polypropylene and other plastics approved for direct food contact. The substrate


103


will protect the micromesh structure


101


from direct food contact. The substrate


103


and micromesh structure


101


is laminated to a paper, paperboard or cellulose supporting material


105


with the micromesh structure protected by the substrate on one surface and the supporting material


105


on the other.




In micromesh structures according to various aspects of the invention, of course, the islands


201


need not be rectilinearly arranged, but may instead form any desired pattern of separate islands. The current flow within each island


201


or region of micromesh structure


101


is now forced to flow along very narrow lines of metal which measure as little as 0.005″ in width and can have resistivities of as much as 1-50 Ω/□. In contrast, the current flow in conventional susceptor devices is random. While the invention is not limited to a particular theory of operation, it is believed that by forcing the current to flow along such narrow conductive paths, higher current densities are induced than are induced in conventional materials. Thus, the heat flux is higher and the maximum temperature rise is also higher. In fact, the temperature rise can be made to exceed requirements by using a micromesh structure covering all available susceptor area. The embodiment of

FIG. 2

, using islands


201


and channels


203


can mitigate any excess heat production. For instance, a typical prior art susceptor heater material measures 25-40 sq. in. dependent upon the food item. The heating area of the

FIG. 2

embodiment may include islands


201


as small as 0.05 sq. in. or as large as 4 sq. in. Each micromesh island


201


is completely separate from adjacent micromesh islands


201


to avoid unnecessarily high temperatures. Thus, viewed over the overall available susceptor area, these micromesh structures


101


are typically both physically and electrically discontinuous.




Susceptors constructed in accordance with aspects of this invention can be tuned by varying any one or more than one of the following parameters:




Width of lines (0.05″-0.005″ typ).




Distance between lines (0.05″-0.005″ typ).




Thickness of lines (metal deposition thickness) (0.05″-0.002″ typ.)




Size of micromesh islands (0.05″ sq. in.-4 sq. in. typ).




It should be noted that many permutations can produce desirable heating temperatures and uniformity of heating. Values outside the stated ranges are also useable; the stated ranges merely define typical parameter values.




As will be understood by the skilled artisan, some parameter choices will not be effective and may even self-destruct in a microwave environment. For instance, a micromesh screen of 1-50 Ω/□ aluminum which otherwise approximates the geometry of the metal grid structure found in the windows of microwave oven doors will generate severe arcing and possible fires. However, by comparison, typical microwave door window screens are made of very thick metal (>0.001″) having relatively low sheet resistivity and thus can conduct high current without heating up appreciably.




An unexpected benefit of susceptor construction in accordance with the invention is that these micromesh susceptors survive longer duration exposure to high-level microwave fields, contrary to conventional wisdom. Conventional wisdom held that any device in which sufficient heat for cooking food is generated will exhibit severe physical deformation leading to self-destruction. Not only do the inventive structures survive better, but they have shown a unique capability to generate high temperatures with reduced fracturing or crazing. The inventive structures exhibit less physical distortion after prolonged use than conventional susceptors or fused susceptors, e.g. as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,005 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,187, and far less deterioration of the conductive elements than comparable areas of conventional susceptor material.




Performance of the susceptor construction described above can be further enhanced by forming the micromesh screen


101


on a substrate


103


whose surface


701


includes a surface relief pattern of very fine lines (

FIGS. 8

,


9


and


10


;


801


) defined by a sequence of peaks


703


and valleys


705


, as shown in FIG.


7


. The pattern of lines, as illustrated in plan view in

FIGS. 8

,


9


and


10


, may include parallel, straight or curved lines (FIG.


8


), straight or curved lines which cross (FIG.


9


), concentric circles (FIG.


10


), combinations of the above, etc. The spacing between adjacent peaks defining non-intersecting lines may range from about 0.1 microns to about 250 microns. A suitable spacing between such peaks is about 0.1 microns. For example, the pattern may resemble an optical diffraction grating or hologram, and may be produced by the same conventional embossing or casting techniques used for producing commercial holograms or diffraction gratings.




The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, micromesh may take the geometric form of plural, parallel fine lines, or the micromesh may take the geometric form of a grid of intersecting fine lines. Therefore, it is intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.



Claims
  • 1. A substrate heating material, comprising:a dielectric film substrate; and a lossy conductive high resolution micromesh of lines between 0.05″ and 0.005″ wide, separated by between 0.05″ and 0.005″ and supported by the dielectric film substrate.
  • 2. The material of claim 1, wherein the high resolution micromesh further comprises vapor deposited aluminum.
  • 3. The material of claim 2, wherein the high resolution micromesh has an RTA of about 25%/25%/50%.
  • 4. The material of claim 1, wherein the conductive members have a resistivity of 1-50 Ω/□.
  • 5. The material of claim 1, wherein the high resolution micromesh is supported by a surface relief pattern on the substrate comprising a fine line pattern defined by a sequence of peaks and valleys.
  • 6. The material of claim 5, wherein a distance between peaks defining non-intersecting lines is between about 0.1 microns and about 250 microns.
  • 7. The material of claim 6, wherein the distance is about 0.1 microns.
  • 8. The material of claim 5, wherein the fine line pattern is embossed into the substrate.
  • 9. The material of claim 5, wherein the fine line pattern is cast into the surface of the substrate.
  • 10. A food package comprising:a dielectric film substrate; a susceptor region including a lossy conductor defining a high resolution micromesh pattern of lines between 0.05″ and 0.005″ wide, separated by between 0.05″ and 0.005″ and supported by the dielectric film substrate; and a food container to which the lossy conductor and substrate are laminated, the lossy conductor being disposed between a wall of the food container and the substrate.
  • 11. The food package of claim 10, wherein the susceptor region includes a plurality of separate lossy conductors each having a micromesh pattern, and each electrically and physically discontinuous from another.
  • 12. The food package of claim 10, wherein the susceptor region includes a plurality of separate lossy conductors each having a micromesh pattern, and each connected to another only by a susceptor fuse region.
  • 13. The food package of claim 10, wherein the food container is an unformed flexible wrap.
  • 14. The food package of claim 13, where the wrap is plastic.
  • 15. The food package of claim 13, wherein the wrap is cellulose.
  • 16. The food package of claim 13, wherein the wrap is paper.
  • 17. The food package of claim 10, wherein the food container is a bag.
  • 18. The food package of claim 17, wherein the bag is cellulose.
  • 19. The food package of claim 17, wherein the bag is paper.
  • 20. The food package of claim 17, wherein the bag is plastics.
  • 21. The food package of claim 10, wherein the food container is a box.
  • 22. The food package of claim 21, wherein the box is paperboard.
  • 23. The food package of claim 10, where the food container is a tray.
  • 24. The food package of claim 23, wherein the tray is plastic.
  • 25. The food package of claim 23, wherein the tray is paperboard.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/758,697, filed Dec. 3, 1996 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
3302632 Fichtner Feb 1967
3783220 Tanizaki Jan 1974
4267420 Brastad May 1981
4641005 Seiferth Feb 1987
4835352 Sasaki et al. May 1989
4933193 Fisher Jun 1990
4982064 Hartman et al. Jan 1991
5038009 Babbitt Aug 1991
5075526 Sklenak et al. Dec 1991
5412187 Walters et al. May 1995
5500511 Hansen et al. Mar 1996
5633073 Cheung et al. May 1997
5916469 Scoles et al. Jun 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
2160924 Jun 1973 DE
0 344 839 Dec 1989 EP
0 365 729 A2 Feb 1990 EP
64-58620 Mar 1989 JP
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/758697 Dec 1996 US
Child 08/954803 US