The invention relates to a microphone arrangement comprising a microphone capsule having a dimension such, that it can be accommodated at the far end of the ear canal of an artificial head, and comprising a microphone circuit. The invention relates also to a microphone capsule and a microphone circuit in the microphone arrangement.
A microphone arrangement for insertion in an ear canal of a human ear is known from US patent document 5692859.
This known microphone arrangement is unable to replicate correctly the localization capabilities of human hearing and the SLD effect (SLD=sound level loudness divergence).
The object of the invention is to propose a microphone arrangement that is able to replicate correctly the localization capabilities of human hearing and the SLD effect (SLD=sound level loudness divergence).
To this end the microphone arrangement according to the invention is characterized according to the features of the 1st claim. Further exemplary embodiments of the microphone arrangement according to the invention are defined by the other claims.
The invention is based on the following knowledge.
It is known that, with the same sound pressure level in the ear canal, headphones produce less loudness than loudspeakers (SLD effect), if the presentation of sound signals is diotic or monotic. Furthermore, it is known that, when hearing naturally, human hearing enables the reliable localization of sound events in the median plane of the head, although only spectral features of the outer-ear transmission function can be used for this. This capability is not lost even with different spectral compositions of the noise event. With headphone reproduction, by contrast, this localization capability is limited considerably. New study results give reason to suppose that the SLD effect and the lack of localization capability in the median plane in the case of headphone reproduction have an interrelationship based on the sound field impedance on the ear. With headphones, this can differ considerably from natural sound sources or loudspeakers. Spectral features caused by the head and body are evident in highs and lows in the frequency response. However, these are also associated with certain changes in the sound field impedance. If the human hearing does in fact gain spectral features from an impedance measurement and not only by way of the sound pressure, the hearing could determine the directional localization irrespective of the spectrum of the sound source. This would explain why the capabilities of directional localization in the median plane are poorer with headphone reproduction.
Because the microphone arrangement provides not only the sound pressure signal, but also a signal that is a measure for the sound field impedance, more acoustic features of sound sources relating to sound field impedance can be measured than with the currently usual methods of sound pressure measurement.
The invention is explained further in the description of figures below with the help of a few exemplary embodiments.
It shows:
The mode of action is as follows.
With the signal S1 of the pressure microphone and of a current-force transducer IFW the impedance diaphragm IM is tensioned by way of spring F in the phases of rising pressure (+/−). In the phases of decreasing pressure the current-force transducer IFW is decoupled from the impedance diaphragm and the force stored in the spring is returned to the sound field via the impedance diaphragm IM. The force that is stored in the spring is higher than the force that the sound field itself exerts onto the impedance diaphragm. The spring accelerates the sound field and senses its resistance. The velocity v, with which the impedance diaphragm is moved by the tensioned spring, depends on this sound field impedance. The velocity v is converted by a velocity sensor VS into a corresponding electrical signal S2. Here, the velocity signal during the decreasing pressure phase is crucial.
There is an interrelationship between this signal and the sound field impedance.
This knowledge leads to a solution for the microphone arrangement according to the invention as shown in
The microphone arrangement according to the invention in
The microphone capsule 250 is further provided with a diaphragm 210 and provided with a second microphone 214 with an output 222. The second microphone 214 is accommodated in a second space 216. The second space 216 is coupled to the sound entrance space 200 via an opening. The diaphragm 210 is accommodated in this opening and in size is equal to the size of said opening. Thus, the diaphragm closes said opening completely. The second microphone 214 is accommodated in the second space 216 and measures the sound pressure in the second space 216.
The diaphragm 210 is provided with a driver arrangement, in this exemplary embodiment in the form of a driver coil 212. The system forms an electrodynamic transducer.
The microphone circuit 260 contains a first input 204 coupled to the output of the first microphone 202, a second input 222 coupled to the output of the second microphone 214, and a third output 220 for supplying a driver signal to the driver coil 212. The first input 204 is coupled to the first output 206 of the microphone circuit 260—if appropriate, by way of an amplifier circuit 208—for supplying the first microphone signal, which is a measure for a sound pressure (SPL=sound pressure level) measured by the first microphone 202. The second input 222 is coupled to the second output 224 of the microphone circuit 260—if appropriate, by way of an amplifier circuit 228—for supplying the second microphone signal, which is a measure for an acoustic impedance measured by the microphone arrangement 250, 260, as explained later in more detail.
The microphone circuit 260 contains further a driver signal generation circuit 218, with an input coupled to the first input 204 of the microphone circuit 260 and an output coupled to the third output 220 of the microphone circuit 260, to control the driver coil 212. The driver signal generation circuit 218 may contain a further output 230. The signal at this output 230 is a blanking signal which is required in order to generate a better impedance signal, as explained further with the help of
During the increasing pressure phase of the positive half-wave, the signal processing in the driver signal generation circuit 218 generates an electrical voltage for the electrodynamic transducer, such that its diaphragm is forced into the hollow space 216 and generates a pressure there. For the increasing pressure phase of the negative half-wave a correspondingly inverted voltage is generated. During the respective falling pressure phases the voltages are switched off, such that the electrodynamic transducer becomes current-free. During the current-free phase, the diaphragm 210 of the transducer is forced into the initial position only by the stored pressure in the hollow space 216. The blanking signal at output 230 of the microphone circuit 260 characterizes the phase of the decreasing pressure. The signal of the second microphone 214, which is available at output 224, is evaluated only during the period of decreasing pressure.
The driver signal generation circuit 218 is provided with a first series arrangement consisting of a first rectifier 302, a first differentiator 304 and a second rectifier 306, a second series arrangement consisting of a third rectifier 308, a second differentiator 310 and a fourth rectifier 312, a signal combination arrangement 313, and a controllable modulator arrangement 316. The input 320 of the driver signal generation circuit is coupled to first terminals 322, 324 of the two series arrangements and to an input of the modulator arrangement 316. Second terminals 326, 328 of the two series arrangements are coupled to corresponding inputs of the signal combination arrangement 313. An output of the signal combination arrangement 313 is coupled to a control input 330 of the modulator arrangement 316—if appropriate, by way of an amplifier arrangement 340—and, if appropriate, to the output 230. An output of the modulator arrangement 316 is coupled to the output 220 of the driver signal generation circuit—if appropriate, by way of an amplifier arrangement 342.
The signal combination arrangement 313 can composed in different ways. For example,
The modulator arrangement 316 is preferably an amplitude modulator device. The modulator arrangement 316 can also be embodied as a controllable switch arrangement, e.g., as shown in
The first rectifier 302 and the fourth rectifier 312 of the first and second series arrangement comprise a rectifying function in a first direction. The second and third rectifier 306 and 308, respectively, of the first and second series arrangement comprise a rectifying function in the opposite direction to the first specified direction.
The rectifiers 302, 306, 308 and 312 are preferably precision rectifiers. Such rectifiers are able also to rectify low-amplitude signals correctly.
The mode of action of the driver signal generation circuit 218 on the behaviour of the microphone arrangement consists in determining the phases of the falling sound pressure for the positive and negative half-waves, in order to thereby generate a signal, with the help of which the electrodynamic transducer can be made current-free and in order to distinguish the time interval during which the evaluation of the signal of the second microphone 214 is carried out. This signal section contains the information on the velocity with which the diaphragm of the electrodynamic transducer moves back into the rest position.
The function of this diaphragm in the microphone arrangement is that it is to be viewed as imitation of a part of the eardrum of a human ear and detects the acoustic waves entering the ear canal in the same way. In fact, an acoustic impedance is determined by this diaphragm in dependence on acoustic waves that enter the ear canal of the artificial head.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102016000037055 | Apr 2016 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/058619 | 4/11/2017 | WO | 00 |