MICROPHONE DEVICE

Abstract

A microphone device is provided, including first and second chambers, first and second acoustic sensors, and a sound transmission device. The first and second chambers include the first and second acoustic ports, respectively. The first and second acoustic sensors are arranged in the first chamber and the second chamber, respectively. The sound transmission device coupled to the first and second chambers includes third and fourth acoustic ports, a first acoustic tube, and a second acoustic tube. The first acoustic tube communicates with the first acoustic port and the third acoustic port. The second acoustic tube communicates with the second acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port. The sensitivity difference between the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor is determined based on the length difference or the cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a microphone device, and in particular it relates to a directional microphone device which supports different sensitivities.

Description of the Related Art

Currently, most microphone devices are capacitive microphones in which micro-electro mechanical system (MEMS) microphones are widely used. A MEMS microphone uses MEMS, which can integrate electronic, electrical, and mechanical functions into a single device. Therefore, a MEMS microphone may have the advantages of a small size, low power consumption, easy packaging, and resistance to interference.

In general, a directional microphone has a better signal-to-noise ratio and an improved performance in the microphone device's acoustic signal processing. If the dynamic range of the microphone increases, then the microphone can correctly receive a wider range of volume. Therefore, it is desirable to have a directional microphone device which supports a wide dynamic range.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A detailed description is given in the following embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.

The present disclosure provides a microphone device. The microphone device comprises a first chamber, a second chamber, a first acoustic sensor, a second acoustic sensor and a sound transmission device. The first chamber comprises a first acoustic port. The second chamber comprises a second acoustic port. The first acoustic sensor is arranged in the first chamber. The second acoustic sensor is arranged in the second chamber. The sound transmission device is coupled to the first chamber and the second chamber. The sound transmission device comprises a third acoustic port, a fourth acoustic port, a first acoustic tube and a second acoustic tube. The first acoustic tube communicates with the first acoustic port and the third acoustic port, and the second acoustic tube communicates with the second acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port. The directivity of the microphone device is determined based on the length difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube or determined based on the cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube. The sensitivity difference between the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor is determined based on the length difference or determined based on the cross-sectional area difference.

The present disclosure provides a control method of a microphone device, comprising: determining the sensitivity difference between a first acoustic sensor inside a first chamber of the microphone device and a second acoustic sensor inside a second chamber of the microphone device based on the length difference between a first acoustic tube and a second acoustic tube of a sound transmission device of the microphone device or based on the cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube; and determining directivity of the microphone device based on the length difference or the cross-sectional area difference.

The sound transmission device is coupled to the first chamber and the second chamber. The first acoustic tube communicates with a first acoustic port of the first chamber and a third acoustic port of the sound transmission device, and the second acoustic tube communicates with a second acoustic port of the second chamber and a fourth acoustic port of the sound transmission device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure can be more fully understood by reading the subsequent detailed description and examples with references made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a microphone device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2A-2B is a schematic diagram of a microphone device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an acoustic tube according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4A-4B is a chart illustrating the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube section and the sensitivity of the microphone according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4C is a chart illustrating the relationship between the length of the acoustic tube and the sensitivity of the microphone according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a polarity pattern illustrating the relationship between the length of the acoustic tube and the directivity of the microphone according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 is a polarity pattern illustrating the relationship between the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube and the directivity of the microphone according to some embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7A-7B is a schematic diagram of a microphone device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a control method of a microphone device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is of the best-contemplated mode of carrying out the invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention and should not be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is best determined by reference to the appended claims.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a microphone device 100 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The microphone device 100 includes the chamber CH₁, the chamber CH₂, the acoustic sensor 110, the acoustic sensor 120 and the sound transmission device 150. The chamber CH₁ comprises the acoustic port 130, and the chamber CH₂ comprises the acoustic port 140. In some embodiments, the acoustic sensor 110 and acoustic sensor 120 are the micro-electro mechanical system (MEMS) devices.

The acoustic sensor 110 includes the diaphragm 111, and the acoustic sensor 120 includes the diaphragm 121. The sound transmission device 150 coupled to the chambers CH₁ and CH₂ includes the acoustic tube 151, the acoustic tube 152, the acoustic port 153 and the acoustic port 154. The acoustic tube 151 communicates with the acoustic port 130 and the acoustic port 153. The acoustic tube 152 communicates with the acoustic port 140 and the acoustic port 154.

In some embodiments, the length difference between the acoustic tubes 151 and 152 or the cross-sectional area difference between the acoustic tube 151 and the acoustic tube 152 can determine directivity of the microphone device 100. In some embodiments, the length difference between the acoustic tubes 151 and 152 or the cross-sectional area difference between the acoustic tube 151 and the acoustic tube 152 (e.g., the volume difference between the acoustic tubes 151 and 152) can determine the sensitivity difference between the acoustic sensors 110 and 120.

As shown in FIG. 1, the acoustic port 130 corresponds to the position of the diaphragm 111, and the acoustic port 140 corresponds to the position of the diaphragm 121. In some embodiments, when the sound wave is propagated from the acoustic port 153 to the acoustic port 130, the sound wave is transmitted to the diaphragm 111 rather than diaphragm 121. Similarly, when the sound wave is propagated from the acoustic port 154 to the acoustic port 140, the sound wave is transmitted to the diaphragm 121 rather than diaphragm 111. In such cases, the acoustic sensor 110 is not interrupted by the sound wave transmitted to the acoustic sensor 120, and the acoustic sensor 120 is not interrupted by the sound wave transmitted to the acoustic sensor 110. Accordingly, the performance of the directivity of the microphone device 100 is improved.

In some embodiments, the size of the diaphragm 111 and the size of the diaphragm 121 are different, so the rigidity of the diaphragm 111 and the rigidity of the diaphragm 121 are also different, which makes the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor 110 different from the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor 120 and increases the dynamic range of the microphone device 100. In some embodiments, the acoustic tube 151 and the acoustic tube 152 may be different lengths or have different cross-sectional areas. In such cases, when the sound wave is transmitted to the diaphragm 111 and the diaphragm 121 through the acoustic tube 151 and the acoustic tube 152, respectively, the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube 151 and that caused by the acoustic tube 152 are different, which makes the sensitivity of acoustic sensor 110 different from the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor 120 and increases the dynamic range of the microphone device 100.

Specifically, one embodiment related to the microphone device described above is illustrated in FIG. 2A. FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of a microphone device 200A according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The microphone device 200A includes the chamber CH₂₁, the chamber CH₂₂, the acoustic sensor M₁, the acoustic sensor M₂ and the sound transmission device 210.

The chamber CH₂₁ and chamber CH₂₂ are formed by the microphone cover 201 and the circuit board 202 which are coupled to each other. The sound transmission device 210 is formed by the circuit board 202. The chamber CH₂₁ includes the acoustic port O₁, and the chamber CH₂₂ includes the acoustic port O₂. The acoustic sensor M₁ and the integrated circuit C₁ are placed inside the chamber CH₂₁, and the acoustic sensor M₂ is placed inside the chamber CH₂₂. The circuit board 202 includes the acoustic tube S₂₁, the acoustic tube S₂₂, the acoustic port O₃, and the acoustic port O₄. The acoustic tube S₂₁ communicates with the acoustic port O₁ and the acoustic port O₃, and the acoustic tube S₂₂ communicates with the acoustic port O₂ and the acoustic port O₄.

As shown in FIG. 2A, the acoustic sensor M₁ includes diaphragm D₁, and the acoustic sensor M₂ includes diaphragm D₂. The acoustic port O₁ corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₁, which makes the diaphragm D₁ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O₁. The acoustic port O₂ corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₂, which makes the diaphragm D₂ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O₂.

The integrated circuit C₁ is coupled to the acoustic sensor M₁ and the acoustic sensor M₂ to provide voltage to the acoustic sensors M₁ and M₂ and process the signals received from the acoustic sensors M₁ and M₂. In some embodiments, the signals received from the acoustic sensors M₁ and M₂ respectively correspond to the vibrations of the diaphragms D1 and D2 in response to the sound. In some embodiments, the integrated circuit C₁ may provide different respective voltages to the acoustic sensor M₁ and the acoustic sensor M₂, which makes the distance between the diaphragm D₁ and the back-plate (not shown in FIG. 2A) of the acoustic sensor M1 different from the distance between the diaphragm D₂ and the back-plate (not shown in FIG. 2A) of the acoustic sensor M₂. In such cases, the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₁ is different from the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂, which increases the dynamic range of the microphone device 200A. In some embodiments, the integrated circuit C₁ may control the directivity of the microphone device 200A by controlling the acoustic sensor M₁ and acoustic sensor M₂ and processing the signals received by the acoustic sensor M₁ and acoustic sensor M₁ (e.g., adding additional delay to one of the signals).

In this embodiment, the length L₂₁ of the acoustic tube S₂₁ is shorter than the length L₂₂ of the acoustic tube S₂₂. Accordingly, the sound path (or propagation path) of the sound transmitted to the diaphragm D₁ through the acoustic tube S₂₁ is shorter than the sound path of the sound transmitted to the diaphragm D₂ through the acoustic tube S₂₂. Based on the distance d₁ and the different length between the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the acoustic tube S₂₂, the sound may substantially reach both the diaphragm D₁ and the diaphragm D₂ at the same time that the sound is substantially transmitted in a specific direction. In such cases, the acoustic tube S₂₁, the acoustic tube S₂₂, and the distance d₁ may determine the directivity of the microphone device 200A.

Since the sound path of the acoustic tube S₂₂ is longer than the sound path of the acoustic tube S₂₁, the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₂₂ is greater than the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₂₁. In such cases, the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₁ may be better than the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂ (i.e., the acoustic sensor M₁ is more sensitive than the acoustic sensor M₂), which makes the microphone device 200A support two different sensitivities and makes the microphone device 200A have a wider dynamic range. Therefore, the sound transmission device 210 including the acoustic tubes S₂₁ and S₂₂ can be utilized to determine the directivity of the microphone device 200A and make the microphone device 200A have a wide dynamic range.

In some embodiments, the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the acoustic tube S₂₂ may have different cross-sectional areas. Since different cross-sectional areas cause different sound degradations, the dynamic range and the directivity of the microphone device 200A can be designed based on different cross-sectional areas of the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the acoustic tube S₂₂.

FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram of a microphone device 200B according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The difference between the microphone device 200A and the microphone device 200B are the integrated circuits C_1B and C_2B. The integrated circuits C_1B and C_2B are coupled to the acoustic sensor M₁ and the acoustic sensor M₂, respectively. The integrated circuits C_1B and C_2B may perform functions of the integrated circuit C₁ which are described above. In some embodiments, the integrated circuits C₁, C_1B and C_2B include the digital-signal-processing (DSP) circuit, Digital/Analog converter and operational amplifier. In this embodiment, the chambers CH₂₁ and CH₂₂ have the same size, and the arrangement of the integrated circuit C_1B and the acoustic sensor M₁ in the chamber CH₂₁ is the same as the arrangement of the integrated circuit C_2B and the acoustic sensor M₂ in the chamber CH₂. Therefore, the environments in the chambers CH₂₁ and CH₂₂ are the same, which makes the difference between sounds respectively received by the acoustic sensors M₁ and M₂ are mainly caused by the difference sound paths between the acoustic tubes S₂₁ and S₂₂. In such cases, the accuracy of directivity of the microphone device 200B is improved.

In some embodiments, the circuit board 202 may include multiple layers. In some embodiments, the circuit board 202 may consist of different circuit boards. For example, the acoustic port O₁ and acoustic port O₂ are placed on a first circuit board, and the acoustic port O₃ and acoustic port O₄ are placed on a second circuit board which coupled to the first circuit board.

FIG. 3 illustrates the acoustic tube S₂₂. If the cross-sectional area Cs of the acoustic tube S₂₂ becomes larger (i.e. the length t or the length w becomes longer), then the acoustic tube S₂₂ receives more sound energy and then reduces the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₂₂, as shown in FIGS. 4A-4B.

FIG. 4A is a chart showing the relationship between the length t and the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂ when the length w and length L₂₂ of the acoustic tube S₂₂ are 0.8 mm and 0.85 mm, respectively. As shown in FIG. 4A, the sensitivity degradation (or the sensitivity drop) of the acoustic sensor M₂ is reduced when the length t is increased (i.e. the cross-sectional area is increased). Similarly, FIG. 4B is a chart showing the relationship between the length w and the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂ when the length L₂₂ and length t of the acoustic tube S₂₂ are 0.085 mm and 0.05 mm, respectively. As shown in FIG. 4B, the sensitivity degradation of the acoustic sensor M₂ is reduced when the length w is increased. In some embodiments, the cross-sectional area Cs may be any shape.

If the length L₂₂ of the acoustic tube S₂₂ becomes longer, then the sound path in the acoustic tube S₂₂ also become longer, which increases the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₂₂, as shown in FIG. 4C. FIG. 4C is a chart showing the relationship between the length L₂₂ and the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂ when the length w and the length t of the acoustic tube section S₂₂ are 1.1 mm and 0.05 mm, respectively. As shown in FIG. 4C, the sensitivity degradation (or the sensitivity drop) of the acoustic sensor M₂ is increased when the length L₂₂ is increased.

In some embodiments, the directivity of the microphone device 200A can be designed based on the difference between the length L₂₁ of the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the length L₂₂ of the acoustic tube S₂₂, as shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 5 shows the polarity pattern P₁ of the microphone device 200A having a difference of 8 mm between lengths L₂₁ and L₂₂, the polarity pattern P₂ of the microphone device 200A having a difference of 6 mm between lengths L₂₁ and L₂₂, and the polarity pattern P₃ of the microphone device 200A having a difference of 3 mm between lengths L₂₁ and L₂₂. As shown in FIG. 6, the directivity of the microphone device 200A increases as the difference between the length L₂₁ and the length L₂₂ increases. For example, the bi-directional-microphone function performed by the polarity patterns P₁ is more obvious than that performed by the polarity patterns P₂.

In some embodiments, the directivity of the microphone device 200A can be designed based on the cross-sectional area difference between the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the acoustic tube S₂₂, as shown in FIG. 6. FIG. 6 shows the polarity pattern P₄ of the microphone device 200A having the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₂ which is equal to the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₁, the polarity pattern P₅ of the microphone device 200A having the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₂ which is 2 times larger than the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the polarity pattern P₆ of the microphone device 200A having the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₂ which is 4 times larger than the cross-sectional area of the acoustic tube S₂₁. As shown in FIG. 6, the directivity of the microphone device 200A is designed based on cross-sectional area difference between the acoustic tube S₂₁ and the acoustic tube S₂₂.

FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram of a microphone device 700A according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The microphone device 700A includes the chamber CH₇₁, the chamber CH₇₂, the acoustic sensor M₁, the acoustic sensor M₂, the integrated circuit C₁ and the sound transmission device 710.

The chamber CH₇₁ and chamber CH₇₂ are formed by the microphone cover 702 and the circuit board 703 which are coupled to each other. The sound transmission device 710 is formed by the rubber structure 701. The chamber CH₇₁ includes the acoustic port O₇₁, and the chamber CH₇₂ includes the acoustic port O₇₂. The acoustic sensor M₁ and the integrated circuit C₁ are placed inside the chamber CH₇₁, and the acoustic sensor M₂ is placed inside the chamber CH₇₂. The rubber structure 701 includes the acoustic tube S₇₁, the acoustic tube S₇₂, the acoustic port O₇₃, and the acoustic port O₇₄. The acoustic tube S₇₁ communicates with the acoustic port O₇₁ and the acoustic port O₇₃, and the acoustic tube S₇₂ communicates with the acoustic port O₇₂ and the acoustic port O₇₄.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the acoustic port O₇₁ corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₁, which makes the diaphragm D₁ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O₇₁. The acoustic port O₇₂ corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₂, which makes the diaphragm D₂ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O₇₂.

In this embodiment, the length L₇₁ of the acoustic tube S₇₁ is shorter than the length L₇₂ of the acoustic tube S₇₂. Accordingly, the sound path (or propagation path) of the sound transmitted to the diaphragm D₁ through the acoustic tube S₇₁ is shorter than the sound path of the sound transmitted to the diaphragm D₂ through the acoustic tube S₇₂. Based on the distance d₂ and the different length between the acoustic tube S₇₁ and the acoustic tube S₇₂, the sound may substantially reach both the diaphragm D₁ and the diaphragm D₂ at the same time that the sound is substantially transmitted in a specific direction. In such cases, the acoustic tube S₇₁, the acoustic tube S₇₂, and the distance d₂ may determine the directivity of the microphone device 700A.

Since the sound path of the acoustic tube S₇₂ is longer than the sound path of the acoustic tube S₇₁, the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₇₂ is greater than the sound degradation caused by the acoustic tube S₇₁. In such cases, the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₁ may be better than the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂, which makes the microphone device 700A support two different sensitivities and makes the microphone device 700A have a wider dynamic range. Therefore, the sound transmission device 710 including the acoustic tubes S₇₁ and S₇₂ can be utilized to determine the directivity of the microphone device 700A and make the microphone device 700A have a wide dynamic range.

In some embodiments, the acoustic tube S₇₁ and the acoustic tube S₇₂ may have different cross-sectional areas. Since different cross-sectional areas cause different sound degradations, the dynamic range and the directivity of the microphone device 700A can be designed based on different cross-sectional areas of the acoustic tube S₇₁ and the acoustic tube S₇₂.

FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram of a microphone device 700B according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The microphone device 700B includes the chamber CH_71B, the chamber CH_72B, the acoustic sensor M₁, the acoustic sensor M₂, the integrated circuit C₁ and the sound transmission device 720.

The chamber CH_71B includes the acoustic port O_71B, and the chamber CH_72B includes the acoustic port O_72B. The acoustic sensor M₁ and the integrated circuit C₁ are placed inside the chamber CH_71B, and the acoustic sensor M₂ is placed inside the chamber CH_72B. The chamber CH_71B and chamber CH_72B are formed by the microphone cover 704 and the circuit board 703 which are coupled to each other. The sound transmission device 720 is formed by the microphone cover 704. The microphone cover 704 includes the acoustic tube S_71B, the acoustic tube S_72B, the acoustic port O_73B, and the acoustic port O_74B. The acoustic tube S_71B communicates with the acoustic port O_71B and the acoustic port O_73B, and the acoustic tube S_72B communicates with the acoustic port O_72B and the acoustic port O_74B.

As shown in FIG. 7B, the acoustic port O_71B corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₁, which makes the diaphragm D₁ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O_71B. The acoustic port O_72B corresponds to the position of the diaphragm D₂, which makes the diaphragm D₂ receive sound transmitted from the acoustic port O_72B.

In this embodiment, the length L_71B of the acoustic tube S_71B is shorter than the length L_72B of the acoustic tube S_72B. As described in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 7A, the acoustic tube S_71B, the acoustic tube S_72B, and the distance d₂ may determine the directivity of the microphone device 700B. As described in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 7A, since the sound path of the acoustic tube S_72B is longer than the sound path of the acoustic tube S_71B, the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₁ may be better than the sensitivity of the acoustic sensor M₂. Therefore, the sound transmission device 720 including the acoustic tubes S_71B and S_72B can be utilized to determine the directivity of the microphone device 700B and make the microphone device 700B have a wide dynamic range.

In some embodiments, the acoustic tube S_71B and the acoustic tube S_72B may have different cross-sectional areas. Since different cross-sectional areas cause different sound degradations, the dynamic range and the directivity of the microphone device 700B can be designed based on different cross-sectional areas of the acoustic tube S_71B and the acoustic tube S_72B.

FIG. 8 illustrates the control method 800 of a microphone device (e.g., microphone device 200A, 200B, 700A or 700B). The control method 800 comprises at least one of operations 801 and 802. In operation 801, the control method 800 determines the sensitivity difference between a first acoustic sensor (e.g., acoustic sensor M₁) inside a first chamber (e.g., chamber CH₂₁) of the microphone device and a second acoustic sensor (e.g., acoustic sensor M₂) inside a second chamber (e.g., chamber CH₂₂) of the microphone device based on the length difference between a first acoustic tube (e.g., acoustic tube S₂₁) and a second acoustic tube (e.g., acoustic tube S₂₂) of a sound transmission device (e.g., sound transmission device 210) of the microphone device or based on the cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube. In operation 802, the control method 800 determines directivity of the microphone device based on the length difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube or the cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube.

While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements (as would be apparent to those skilled in the art). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.

Claims

1. A microphone device, comprising: a first chamber, comprising a first acoustic port;a second chamber, comprising a second acoustic port;a first acoustic sensor, arranged in the first chamber;a second acoustic sensor, arranged in the second chamber; anda sound transmission device coupled to the first chamber and the second chamber, comprising: a third acoustic port;a fourth acoustic port;a first acoustic tube, communicating with the first acoustic port and the third acoustic port; anda second acoustic tube, communicating with the second acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port;wherein directivity of the microphone device is determined based on a length difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube or determined based on a cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube;wherein a sensitivity difference between the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor is determined based on the length difference or determined based on the cross-sectional area difference.

2. The microphone device as claimed in claim 1, wherein a first sound path of the first acoustic tube is shorter than a second sound path of the second acoustic tube and makes the first acoustic sensor more sensitive than the second acoustic sensor.

3. The microphone device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: an integrated circuit, coupled to the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor and placed inside the first chamber or the second chamber;wherein the integrated circuit processes signals received by the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor to control the directivity of the microphone device.

4. The microphone device as claimed in claim 3, wherein the integrated circuit provides different respective voltages to the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor to make sensitivity of the first acoustic sensor different from sensitivity of the second acoustic sensor.

5. The microphone device as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a first integrated circuit, coupled to the first acoustic sensor and placed inside the first chamber;a second integrated circuit, coupled to the second acoustic sensor and placed inside the second chamber;wherein a size of the first chamber and a size of the second chamber are the same;wherein arrangement of the first integrated circuit and the first acoustic sensor in the first chamber is the same as arrangement of the second integrated circuit and the second acoustic sensor in the second chamber.

6. The microphone device as claimed in claim 5, wherein the first integrated circuit provides a first voltage to the first acoustic sensor, and the second integrated circuit provides a second voltage which is different from the first voltage to the second acoustic sensor; wherein sensitivity of the first acoustic sensor is different from sensitivity of the second acoustic sensor based on the first voltage and the second voltage.

7. The microphone device as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first chamber and the second chamber are at least formed by a circuit board and a microphone cover; wherein the microphone cover is coupled to the circuit board;wherein the first acoustic port and the second acoustic port are placed on the circuit board;wherein the sound transmission device is formed by the circuit board, and the third acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port are placed on the exterior of the circuit board.

8. The microphone device as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first chamber and the second chamber are at least formed by a circuit board and a microphone cover; wherein the microphone cover is coupled to the circuit board;wherein the first acoustic port and the second acoustic port are placed on the microphone cover;wherein the sound transmission device is formed by the microphone cover, and the third acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port are placed on the exterior of the microphone cover.

9. The microphone device as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first chamber and the second chamber are at least formed by a circuit board and a microphone cover; wherein the microphone cover is coupled to the circuit board;wherein the microphone device further comprises a rubber structure which is coupled to the microphone cover;wherein the first acoustic port and the second acoustic port are placed on the microphone cover;wherein the sound transmission device is formed by the rubber structure, and the third acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port are placed on the exterior of the rubber structure.

10. A microphone device, comprising: a first chamber, comprising a first acoustic port;a second chamber, comprising a second acoustic port;a first acoustic sensor, arranged in the first chamber;a second acoustic sensor, arranged in the second chamber;an integrated circuit, coupled to the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor and placed inside the first chamber or the second chamber; anda sound transmission device coupled to the first chamber and the second chamber, comprising: a third acoustic port;a fourth acoustic port;a first acoustic tube, communicating with the first acoustic port and the third acoustic port; anda second acoustic tube, communicating with the second acoustic port and the fourth acoustic port;wherein the integrated circuit provides different respective voltages to the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor;wherein directivity of the microphone device is determined based on a length difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube or determined based on a cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube;wherein a sensitivity difference between the first acoustic sensor and the second acoustic sensor is determined based on the length difference or determined based on the cross-sectional area difference.

11. A control method of a microphone device, comprising: determining a sensitivity difference between a first acoustic sensor inside a first chamber of the microphone device and a second acoustic sensor inside a second chamber of the microphone device based on a length difference between a first acoustic tube and a second acoustic tube of a sound transmission device of the microphone device or based on a cross-sectional area difference between the first acoustic tube and the second acoustic tube; anddetermining directivity of the microphone device based on the length difference or the cross-sectional area difference;wherein the sound transmission device is coupled to the first chamber and the second chamber;wherein the first acoustic tube communicates with a first acoustic port of the first chamber and a third acoustic port of the sound transmission device, and the second acoustic tube communicates with a second acoustic port of the second chamber and a fourth acoustic port of the sound transmission device.