The present invention pertains to a microphone that has a transducer and a closed cell foam body located between the transducer and an area for receiving sound.
Microphones are commonly used to collect sound pressure variations from a sound source. Microphones commonly have a transducer to collect the sound, which is then sent to another device such as an amplifier or transmitter—see, for example U.S. Pat. No. 3,403,234. The transducer often is surrounded by a sound transmission media (STM). The STM represents an interface of the microphone with the ambient, acoustical environment. Sound pressure variation from speech, for example, must translate the STM to actuate the microphone transducer. A typical STM includes an open-cell foam material and a thin membrane—see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,243 to McCormick et al. These parts reside between the transducer and the sound source. The foam provides mechanical and wind buffeting protection, while the membrane provides resistance to water or particulate intrusion. The thin membrane may be in the form of a thin polyethylene-terephthalate (PET) plastic film or similar material such as an acoustic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane, transparent for sound but closed for water. These thin membranes, however, represent a potential weak point in a microphone system. Being both thin and porous, they can be compromised mechanically and physically.
The present invention provides a microphone that comprises a transducer and a closed cell foam body positioned between the transducer and an area for receiving ambient sound. The present invention differs from known microphones in that the microphone uses a closed cell foam as the STM. As indicated above, conventional microphone products typically use an open cell foam material to protect the transducer. The present invention involves the discovery that a closed-cell foam may effectively protect the transducer without sound transmission loss from the sound source to the transducer. The present invention may allow an insertion loss of not greater than 10 dB/mm in the 300 to 3400 Hz frequency band when measured according to Insertion Loss Test Method described below. The invention also allows a microphone to be constructed which does not need an acoustic PTFE membrane to protect the transducer from being exposed to elements in the ambient environment. The microphone accordingly may be protected without substantial sound transmission loss, while using fewer parts than conventional products. Good voice transmission, wind buffeting mitigation, and environmental protection can be achieved without need for a membrane to provide particulate and water protection.
The terms set forth below will have the meanings as defined:
“closed cell” means that there are a series of discrete pockets or cells, each surrounded by a solid material;
“enclosed” means being surrounded the transducer from all directions and paths where sound can reach the surrounded item;
“foam” means a substance that has pockets of gas in a solid medium;
“insertion loss” means the difference between the signal levels in decibels (dB) with and without the device being tested in the transmission line;
“microphone” means a device that has an input for receiving energy in the form of sound at a first location and that converts the sound into another signal that is transmitted to a second location through an output on the device; and
“transducer” means a device that converts acoustic sound into an electrical and/or optical signal.
In practicing the present invention, a microphone is provided which comprises a transducer and a closed cell foam material positioned between the transducer and an opening for receiving ambient sound. The provision of a closed cell foam material so-positioned enables the transducer to be protected without use of a film membrane and with good sound transmission.
Test Methods
Insertion Loss Test Method
To evaluate insertion loss of a closed cell foam STM element, an 18 mm diameter section of foam was mounted in a sample holder that had a standard pressure microphone located behind the foam. The holder was configured to have the same size, and used material similar to the housing, of the microphone being measured. Only the front side of the foam was exposed to sound transmission: the backside of the holder had the sound inlet closed. Behind the closed cell foam, and in front of the pressure microphone, there was a cavity that had a size of 0.25 cm3, the same size as the acoustic cavity in the microphone housing having the STM element being measured.
The assembly was placed in an acoustic chamber that had an inside volume of approximately 6 cubic meters (m3). A measurement system, which was capable of generating and recording acoustic signals, both in time and in frequency, was used to capture the signal from the microphone both with and without the closed cell foam. A pink noise sound source that had equal energy in all 1/12 octave band was used to generate the test signal. Insertion loss was then calculated as the difference between the signal with and without the mounted foam for the frequency band of 300 Hz to 3400 Hz.
Environmental Test Method
An environmental test is conducted by submerging a microphone assembly in a 5% salt solution of water for 1 hour at room temperature (approximate 22° C.). Any intrusion of the salt solution past the STM is noted as a failure. Re-measurement of the microphone performance may be conducted after all visible water drops are removed from the exterior of the housing; the microphone should then perform equal to its performance before the water submerging step.
An all-weather voice communication boom microphone assembly that was similar to the illustrated embodiment and that housed a microphone transducer was assembled as follows. A microphone assembly was created, which had three interconnected parts: a microphone head, a boom arm, and a device holder. The microphone head contained several elements: a transducer, transducer support shells, and a closed-cell foam STM. The outer containment body of the microphone head enclosed the voice transmission elements and attached the microphone head to the boom arm. Electrical leads were connected to the transducer and were passed through the boom arm to the electrical fitting. The boom arm both supported the microphone head and the electrical leads 23 and further provided and electrical connection to a communication headset. The boom arm was 154 mm long and was 6 mm in diameter and was constructed as a typical microphone gooseneck arm. The boom arm was flexible for positioning the boom head. The microphone head was attached to the boom arm at one end in sealed fashion.
The transducer was a OWMSCDY-13843T-71-150 from OLE WOLFF ELEKTRONIK A/S located at Roedengvej 25 4180 Soroe Denmark. The transducer had a 13.8 mm diameter and had a dynamic hypercardioid microphone capsule. Situated in the microphone head, the transducer was protected on both the front and rear sides by an EV30 closed cell foam of the EVASOTE™ series. The closed-cell foam had an internal cell size of 0.45 mm and was made from a cross-linked, ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) copolymer manufactured by Zotefoams PLC, 675 Mitcham Road, Croydon CR9 3AL United Kingdom. The foam was 2 mm thick and had a diameter of 18 mm.
The outer containment body parts of the microphone head were produced in a plastic three-dimensional (3D) prototype printer that had a diameter of 22 mm and, as assembled, had a front to back distance of 12 mm. When assembled, the outer containment body of the microphone head clamped the transducer in the O-ring, support shells, and the closed cell foam parts into axial centricity with the windows of the outer containment body parts. The unit housing and positioning of the transducer and closed cell foam therein provided an acoustic cavity volume between the transducer and the closed cell foam of approximately 0.25 cm3.
The microphone assembly of the present example was tested in accordance with the Insertion Loss Test Method and was also submitted to a liquid intrusion test as described in the Environmental Test Method. Insertion loss for the 2 mm thick EV30 closed cell foam was determined to be 3 dB, well within functional parameters needed for suitable voice transmission. When submitted to environmental testing, the microphone passed: there was no evidence of liquid intrusion beyond the closed cell foam.
This invention may take on various modifications and alterations without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, this invention is not limited to the above-described but is to be controlled by the limitations set forth in the following claims and any equivalents thereof.
This invention also may be suitably practiced in the absence of any element not specifically disclosed herein.
All patents and patent applications cited above, including those in the Background section, are incorporated by reference into this document in total. To the extent there is a conflict or discrepancy between the disclosure in such incorporated document and the above specification, the above specification will control.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3403234 | Barnes | Sep 1968 | A |
4151378 | Watson | Apr 1979 | A |
4570746 | Das | Feb 1986 | A |
5446788 | Lucey | Aug 1995 | A |
5574794 | Valley | Nov 1996 | A |
5808243 | McCormick | Sep 1998 | A |
5946403 | Josephson | Aug 1999 | A |
5988585 | Eaton | Nov 1999 | A |
6451148 | Jenner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6587564 | Cusson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6720362 | Park | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7783069 | Miller | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8401217 | Shams | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8739926 | Mori | Jun 2014 | B1 |
20020025055 | Stonikas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030022955 | Park et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040001945 | Cate | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20090046882 | Sakurai | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052699 | Andersen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100111345 | Andrea | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150385 | Sporer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110132095 | Zuckerwar | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19742294 | Apr 1999 | DE |
29711775 | Apr 1999 | DE |
130400 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 711 881 | May 1996 | EP |
2 925 014 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2364463 | Jan 2002 | GB |
WO 2004025988 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2008043385 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2013038915 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2013141158 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
White et al., “The Audio Dictionary”, Pop Filter, 3rd Edition, 2005, 5 pages. |
Viktorovich, Garanin Georgiy, Ultrasonic Stand of Control of Physical-Mechanical Properties of Metals and Alloys (On the Example of the Titan-Hydrogen System), Federal State Autonomous Education Institution, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150092974 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |