1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates in general to microphones. In particular the invention relates to microphones in mobile phones and their accessories.
2. Brief Description of Related Developments
There is a general need to protect microphones against radio frequency (RF) disturbances for ensuring the proper performance of the microphones. Microphone of mobile phone or mobile phone accessory should furthermore be immune to RF disturbances at the frequencies the cellular system uses. Consider for example a headset accessory of a mobile phone. It has a small earpiece connected to the mobile phone with a wire and the microphone of the headset mounted on a stiff wire at suitable distance from the earpiece so that the microphone can pick up the voice of the user. The user may carry the mobile phone in a pocket during a call. If the user carries the mobile phone in a breast pocket of a shirt or a jacket, the microphone of a headset is very near the radio transmitter of the mobile phone. If the microphone is not adequately protected, it can demodulate the radio frequency signal, in which case the quality of audio signal may deteriorate. Furthermore, there is need to protect microphones against electrostatic discharge (ESD).
Electret microphone is general type of microphones used in mobile phones and accessories. An electret microphone contains a preamplifier, typically a field effect transistor (FET), and voice is converted to electrical signal by capacitance. Changes in the air pressure cause changes to the capacitance between a conductive plate and a conductive polarized foil. The conductive plate, the conductive foil, FET and other microphone parts, which are typically capacitors, are typically placed in side a microphone capsule. This capsule has typically two output contacts with which it is connected to external circuitry.
Electret microphones are protected against RF disturbances and ESD in various ways.
The first protection circuit 110 is connected to first and second output contacts of microphone capsul. The circuit includes in succession from the microphone capsule a series coil L11 at second output contact, a parallel ESD protector VDR1, a series coil L12 at first output contact and a parallel capacitor C12. The capacitor C12 and coil L12 are for filtering disturbances. The ESD protector is in this example a voltage dependent resistor (VDR) or varistor. Its resistance drops shorting the circuit when a electrostatic disturbance having relatively high energy arrives along the transmission line 120. The disadvantage of the external varistor is that it has some internal capacitance, which couples with the capacitance of capacitor C11 causing a new resonance. This may lead to RF immunity failures at some frequency band. For this reason there is coil L11, e.g. a ferrite bead, in the protection circuit 110. It weakens said capacitive coupling and corresponding resonance. However the inductance of coil L11 may cause significant resonance at certain other frequencies. It is possible to add a resistor R11, instead of a coil, in series to one output conductor of the microphone capsule, to weaken said capacitive coupling. However such a resistor should be very large to sustain an ESD pulse. Small surface mounted resistors change their resistance and typically fail in ESD tests. Further adding a resistor between the ESD protector and the microphone may cause the microphone more susceptible to ESD.
The second protection circuit 130 at the other end of headset cable is for protecting the actual microphone amplifier 140. The second protection circuit includes a series coil L13 and a parallel circuit forming of a capacitor C13 and a resistor R12 connected in series.
So in conventional design there may be several, up to ten additional components whose purpose is to protect the microphone from ESD and RF disturbances. The immunity to both ESD and RF disturbances is still inadequate. By means of additional components are overcame some problems, but at the same time arise new difficulties. The more components there are in the circuit, the larger are the conductive loops of circuit and correspondingly the greater the susceptibility to RF-disturbances. Further additional components make new resonance problems.
The object of the invention is to present a microphone structure which is compact, relatively immune to radio frequency disturbances and protected against electro-static discharge.
The basic idea of the invention is as follows: An electro-static discharge protector is placed close to microphone capsule, preferably inside it, between two output conductors of capsule. Parallel with the preamplifier there is a capacitor. Between this capacitor and said ESD-protector is a series resistor. The capacitor, resistor and ESD protector form a low-pass filter protecting the microphone from radio frequency disturbances. The filter structure may include also additional components.
A microphone structure according to the invention comprises a microphone capsule, which has at least first and second output contact, and within said microphone capsule
The advantage of the invention is that when the ESD protector is placed just close to the microphone capsule or within the microphone capsule, it functions both as an ESD protector and a part of a low-pass filter. Another advantage of the invention is that when the disturbances are filtered within the microphone capsule, the conductive capsule functions as a Faraday cage enhancing the RF-immunity of the microphone. Further advantage of the invention is that the conductive loops of the protective circuit are small making the circuit less susceptible to RF disturbances. A further advantage of the invention is that for the capacitance values are allowed greater tolerances than in known structures. This is caused by the fact that the filter in accordance with the invention attenuates disturbances at wider frequency band than known protective structures inside microphone capsule. A further advantage of the invention is that the internal capacitance of the ESD protector does not form above mentioned problem in RF-immunity. On the contrary the internal capacitance improves the RF-immunity, because it is a part of said filter. A further advantage of the invention is that the microphone in accordance with it may function as an ESD protector for other components outside the microphone capsule, typically for the input stage of the microphone amplifier. A further advantage of the invention is that the structure according to it is relatively low in production costs because it has several components less than known microphones with external protection circuitry, and all components needed can be mounted on the same circuit board inside microphone capsule.
The invention will now be described more in detail. In the description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings where
The impedance Z may be mainly resistive or mainly inductive. In latter case it may be e.g. a coil or a ferrite bead. The ESD-protector is in this example a zener diode. It may be also another semiconductor or a polymer component. The polymer component means in this description and patent claims a component having small conductive pieces in plastics and controlled breakdown characteristics.
In the example of
Above it is described the basic solution according to the invention and some variants thereof. The invention is not limited to the solutions described. E.g. the microphone may be also some other type as electret microphone. The protection circuit may comprise several ESD-protectors connected e.g. in a star. The inventional idea can be applied in different ways without departing from the scope defined by the independent claim 1.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20000569 | Mar 2000 | FI | national |
20001327 | Jun 2000 | FI | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4817164 | Bertignoll et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4937877 | Pocock et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5880643 | Bjork et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5930098 | Voldman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940520 | Endo | Aug 1999 | A |
6218883 | Takeuchi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6453048 | Akino | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504937 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516069 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6642297 | Hyatt et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6728555 | Pirila et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
20030228848 | Escoffier et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |