The present invention relates to miniature microphones used in listening devices, such as hearing aids. In particular, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for damping the frequency response in such miniature microphones.
A conventional listening device such as a hearing aid includes, among other things, a microphone and a receiver. The microphone receives sound waves and converts the sound waves to an audio signal. The audio signal is then processed (e.g., amplified) and provided to the receiver. The receiver converts the processed audio signal into an acoustic signal and subsequently broadcasts the acoustic signal to the user.
The microphone generally has a rigid, electrically charged backplate and a moveable metallic diaphragm. The diaphragm divides the inner volume of the microphone into a front volume and a rear volume. Sound waves enter the microphone via a sound inlet and pass into the front volume. The air vibrations created by the entering sound waves cause the metallic diaphragm to move, thereby inducing an electric signal in the electrically charged backplate corresponding to the sound waves. The electric signal is then processed by audio processing circuitry connected to the charged backplate and converted into an audio signal.
For certain applications, including hearing aids and other listening devices, it is desirable to dampen the resonance frequency of the microphone system. One way to dampen the frequency response is to increase the inertance presented to the sound waves entering the microphone by placing an obstruction near the sound inlet in the front volume. Common types of obstructions include a damping screen made of a grid-like mesh material placed over the sound inlet, a shaped embossment or structure formed or placed inside the housing of the microphone near the sound inlet, and the like.
A damping screen, however, can become clogged as debris and foreign material accumulate on its surface. As the dampening screen becomes increasingly clogged, the microphone's frequency response may depart from the specification. A shaped structure can also become less effective as debris accumulates, since the shaped structure depends on its shape to create the desired dampening effect. If the accumulated debris alters the shape of the shaped structure, the microphone's frequency response will be altered. In both of the above cases, the accumulation of debris, such as dust, hairspray, pollen, and other particles, may adversely affect the frequency response of the microphone and may even cause it to malfunction.
Unlike the front volume, the rear volume is typically sealed off and largely impervious to debris. Therefore, some microphones place the damping mechanism in the rear volume to avoid debris accumulation. These microphones use a damping frame between the diaphragm and the backplate to dampen the frequency response. The damping frame has inner slits cut into its opposing edges that, together with the backplate, define apertures through which air may escape from the area between the diaphragm and the backplate to the rest of the rear volume. The escaping air results in a damping of the frequency response of the microphone. An example of such a microphone may be found in commonly-owned U.S. Published Application No. 20030063768 to Cornelius et al., which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The dimensions of the inner slits in the above microphones have to be very precise in order to achieve the desired level of escaping air for damping purposes. Also, the damping frame is normally made of a stiff or rigid material, usually plastic or Kapton®. Moreover, a hole is sometimes punched through the backplate to facilitate handling during assembly of the microphone. This hole has to be subsequently filled (e.g., with adhesive or similar material) in order to prevent air from escaping through the hole. Accordingly, what is needed is an improved way to control the frequency response of the microphone.
The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for damping the resonance frequency in a microphone. The method and apparatus of the invention involve providing an elastomeric frame to support the backplate. The elastomeric frame forms a substantially air tight seal around the backplate. A hole is formed in the backplate and a cover having an opening therein is placed over the hole in the backplate. The frequency response of the microphone may then be controlled by precisely controlling the size, shape, and/or location of the opening in the cover overlaying the hole. The cover may also serve as an electrical contact to other components in the microphone.
In general, in one aspect, the invention is directed to a microphone. The microphone comprises a housing, a diaphragm mounted in the housing, and a backplate mounted in the housing at a known location relative to the diaphragm. An electrical-contact element is provided for carrying signals from the backplate, the electrical-contact element providing an acoustic feature for controlling a frequency response of the microphone.
In general, in another aspect, the invention is directed to a method of manufacturing a microphone, the microphone having a housing, a diaphragm, and a backplate. The method comprises the steps of lancing a hole through the backplate and surrounding the backplate with a support frame. The support frame forms a substantially airtight seal around the backplate and keeps the backplate centered over the diaphragm. In one embodiment, the support frame also keeps the backplate substantially parallel to and spaced apart from the diaphragm. The method further comprises the step of covering up the hole in the backplate with a cover, the cover having an interior wall defining an opening of a predetermined size, shape, and/or location to control a frequency response of the microphone.
In general, in yet another aspect, the invention is directed to a mechanism for damping a frequency response of a microphone. The mechanism comprises a backplate mounted in the microphone, the backplate having an inner wall defining a hole through backplate. The mechanism further comprises a cover covering up the hole in the backplate, the cover having an interior wall defining an opening through the cover, the opening having a predetermined size, shape, and/or location for allowing air to escape through the opening.
In general, in still another aspect, the invention is directed to a method of damping a frequency response of a microphone, the microphone having at least a housing, a diaphragm mounted in the housing, and a backplate mounted in the housing at a known location relative to the diaphragm. The method comprises the steps of creating at least one hole through the backplate and covering up the at least one hole with a cover such that at least one opening having a predetermined size, shape, and/or location remains over the at least one hole. The frequency response of the microphone is dampened based on the predetermined size, shape, and/or location of the at least one opening.
In general, in yet another aspect, the invention is directed to a microphone. The microphone comprises a housing, a diaphragm mounted in the housing, and a backplate mounted substantially parallel to and spaced apart from the diaphragm. The backplate has at least one hole through it. A cover covers up the at least one hole in the backplate. The cover has at least one opening through it, the at least one opening having a predetermined size, shape, and/or location to control a frequency response of the microphone.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to represent each embodiment, or every aspect, of the present invention.
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings, wherein:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
As mentioned above, embodiments of the invention provide a method and apparatus for damping the frequency response in a microphone of a listening device, such as a hearing aid. The method and apparatus of the invention makes use of a hole in the backplate by partially covering the hole to control the frequency response. A substantially airtight seal is formed between the backplate and a frame supporting the backplate to prevent air from escaping through the seal.
A prior art microphone 100 for a conventional listening device is shown in
The backplate support frame 212, unlike the plastic or Kapton® damping frame 112 (see
In some embodiments, the backplate support frame 212 may be in the form of an O-ring surrounding the outer circumference of the backplate 210. This may be better viewed in
In accordance with embodiments of the invention, the backplate 210 has a hole formed therein, defined by an inner wall 216 of the backplate 210. The hole is located in the middle of the backplate 210 and preferably has a generally round shape, although the particular shape and location of the hole is not overly important to the practice of the invention. As such, the hole may be formed using any suitable means, including by poking or lancing the backplate 210. The shape of the hole may then be reworked if needed. The poking or lancing, however, may result in formation of a stub 218 protruding upward from the backplate 210. With prior art microphones, the stub 218 is not used at all and the hole is used merely to facilitate handling of the backplate 210 and is normally filled in afterwards. In the present invention, however, the hole is left opened to help dampen the frequency response of the microphone 200. In some embodiments, the stub 218 is also used, as will be described below.
To control the frequency response of the microphone 200, the amount of air allowed to escape through the hole in the backplate 210 needs to be carefully controlled. Therefore, a foil or cover 220, which may be a metal or plastic cover, is placed over the hole in the backplate 210. The foil or cover 220 may reside on either side of the backplate 210, but is preferably on the side facing away from the diaphragm 206. At least one slit or opening is formed in the foil or cover 220, as defined by the interior wall 222, that is smaller than the hole in the backplate 210. This smaller slit or opening consequently limits the amount of air escaping through the backplate 210 and, hence, the frequency response of the microphone 200. The size, shape, location, and/or number of slits or openings may be determined using any suitable technique known to those having ordinary skill in the art, including by trial and error. The desired amount of frequency response damping may then be achieved by precisely following the determined size, shape, location, and/or number of the slit or opening in the foil or cover 220.
To keep the foil or cover 220 in place on the backplate 210, in some embodiments, a lug 224 may be formed on the foil or cover 220. The lug 224 is then braced against the stub 218 to anchor the foil or cover 220 in place on the backplate 210. Any suitable means may be used to form the lug 224, including by poking or lancing the foil or cover 220. Both the lug 224 and the stub 218 may need to be trimmed for optimal efficacy. It is also possible, for example, to glue or weld the foil or cover 220 to the backplate 210 to secure the foil or cover 220 to the backplate 210. In these latter embodiments, the lug 224 is not needed.
In some embodiments, the foil or cover 220 may further include a clip portion 226 extending from one end of the foil or cover 220 away from the backplate 210 at an upward angle. The upward angle may be less than 90°, in which case the clip portion 226 extends over the foil or cover 220, or it may be greater than 90° (but less than 180°), in which case the clip portion 226 does not extend over the foil or cover 220. In either case, the upward angle of the clip portion 226 gives the foil or cover 220 a spring-like effect, pressing against the other components (e.g., a circuit board) on top of the foil or cover 220 when the housing 202 is closed to keep the foil or cover 220 in place on the backplate 210.
In some embodiments, the clip portion 226 also serves as an electrical contact between the backplate 210 and other components in the microphone 200, like a circuit board (not shown). In existing microphones, some type of electrically conductive wire connects the backplate to the circuit board. The wire carries the electric signals induced in the backplate to the circuit board and is usually attached (e.g., soldered) to the circuit board. In the present invention, however, the electrical contact between the backplate 210 and the circuit board may be provided by the spring-like effect of the clip portion 226 pushing against the circuit board. Preferably, the foil or cover 220 and the clip portion 226 are made of a metallic material that is the same as or similar to the material of the backplate 210 for improved electrical contact.
As mentioned above, spacers may be used to keep the backplate 210 substantially parallel to and spaced apart from the diaphragm 206.
Although the backplate 210 has been shown and described with a single hole through it, the invention is not to be limited thereto. For example, in one embodiment, it is possible to have multiple holes punched through the backplate 210. Then, at least one slit or opening may be formed in the foil or cover 220 over each hole in the backplate 210, with each slit or opening preferably smaller in size than its corresponding hole. It is also possible, of course, to have a single slit or opening in the cover 220 overlapping multiple holes in the backplate 210 without departing from the scope of the invention.
In some embodiments, the foil or cover 320 may further include a backing 324. The backing 324 may be buttressed against the stub 318 to anchor the foil or cover 320 to the backplate 310. Although not expressly shown, a similar backing 324 may be used to secure the foil or cover 220 in the embodiment of
An upwardly angling clip portion 326, similar to the clip portion 226 of
Advantages of the above embodiments include a single foil or cover 220/320 in a microphone 200/300 that can be used both to control the frequency response of the microphone 200/300 as well as to establish an electrical connection between the backplate 210/310 and other components in the microphone. The electrical connection is established and maintained based on the spring-loaded physical contact 20 (i.e., no wire attachment to the circuit board is necessary), which make it easier to assemble the microphone 200/300. In addition, in some embodiments, the foil or cover 220/320 is also self-anchoring in that it keeps itself secured to the backplate 210/310 by virtue of being spring-loaded.
Moreover, the use of a separate component 220/320 to control the frequency response of the microphone 200/300 allows the microphone to be modular. Thus, the same diaphragm 206/306, backplate 210/310, along with the supporting structures 208/308/212/312 therefor, may be used for all microphones, and only the foil or cover 220/320 need vary. As a result, large variations may occur in the size and/or shape of the hole in the backplate 210/310 without affecting the manufacturability of the microphones. This allows manufacturers to pick and choose the desired level of damping by simply selecting a foil or cover 220/320 with a certain size opening.
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Each of these embodiments and obvious variations thereof is contemplated as falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2425481 | Morse | Aug 1947 | A |
2794862 | Tøpholm | Jun 1957 | A |
3013127 | Christensen et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3573397 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3573400 | Sessler et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3588383 | Carlson et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3742156 | Broersma | Jun 1973 | A |
3786202 | Schafft | Jan 1974 | A |
3816671 | Fraim et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3935398 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3944756 | Lininger | Mar 1976 | A |
3963881 | Fraim et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4109116 | Victoreen | Aug 1978 | A |
4117275 | Miyanaga et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4225755 | Block | Sep 1980 | A |
4236051 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4272654 | Carlson | Jun 1981 | A |
4410769 | Tibbetts | Oct 1983 | A |
4456796 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4533795 | Baumhauer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4539441 | Eggert et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4542264 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4558184 | Busch-Vishniac et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4567382 | van Halteren | Jan 1986 | A |
4607145 | Ravinet et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4607383 | Ingalls | Aug 1986 | A |
4621171 | Wada et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4685137 | Watson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4691363 | Khanna | Sep 1987 | A |
4697334 | Madsen et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4701640 | Flygstad et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4728934 | Pf{acute over (α)}nder et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4730283 | Carlson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4764690 | Murphy et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777650 | Frederiksen | Oct 1988 | A |
4790021 | Pribyl | Dec 1988 | A |
4796288 | Busche et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4815138 | Diethelm | Mar 1989 | A |
4815560 | Madaffari | Mar 1989 | A |
4817164 | Bertignoll et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4837833 | Madaffari | Jun 1989 | A |
4845512 | Arway | Jul 1989 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872148 | Kirby et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4891843 | Paulus, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4910840 | Sprenkels et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4922471 | Kuehnel | May 1990 | A |
4977590 | Milovancevic | Dec 1990 | A |
4993072 | Murphy | Feb 1991 | A |
5014322 | Yasuda et al. | May 1991 | A |
5068901 | Carlson | Nov 1991 | A |
5101543 | Cote et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5255246 | van Halteren | Oct 1993 | A |
5319717 | Holesha | Jun 1994 | A |
5335210 | Bernstein | Aug 1994 | A |
5335286 | Carlson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5388163 | Elko et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401914 | Curran et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408534 | Lenzini et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410608 | Lucey et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5446413 | Loeppert et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452268 | Bernstein | Sep 1995 | A |
5490220 | Loeppert | Feb 1996 | A |
5522123 | Kugo | Jun 1996 | A |
5548658 | Ring et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5570428 | Madaffari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5615273 | Lucey et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619476 | Haller et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5673330 | Chang | Sep 1997 | A |
5677965 | Moret et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682075 | Bolleman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708721 | Salvage et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5809155 | Su | Sep 1998 | A |
5861779 | Loeppert et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862239 | Kubli et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870351 | Ladabaum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875251 | Sun | Feb 1999 | A |
5881158 | Lesinski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889872 | Sooriakumar et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894452 | Ladabaum et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5946403 | Josephson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949895 | Ball et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952645 | Wang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970159 | McIntosh | Oct 1999 | A |
5978491 | Papadopoulos | Nov 1999 | A |
5982709 | Ladabaum et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982905 | Grodinsky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990454 | Westerberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011855 | Selfridge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031922 | Tibbetts | Feb 2000 | A |
6044160 | Norris | Mar 2000 | A |
6078677 | Dolleman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6169810 | van Halteren et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178249 | Hietanen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201876 | Niemi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243474 | Tai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6323049 | Lee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366678 | Madaffari et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438243 | Ikeuchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6504937 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532293 | Collins | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549632 | Akino et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580797 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594369 | Une | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597793 | Darbut et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606389 | Selfridge et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614911 | Watson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647368 | Nemirovski | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671379 | Nemirovski | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677176 | Wong et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684484 | Collins | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694032 | Yun et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704427 | Kearey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707920 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6950529 | Wilmink | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20020076076 | Kay et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020172382 | Nakabayashi | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172389 | Pavlovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030021432 | Scheeper et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030063768 | Cornelius et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076970 | van Halteren et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081801 | Hohjyo | May 2003 | A1 |
20030194103 | Kakinuma | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040047486 | Van Doorn et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086149 | Johannsen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2119912 | Mar 1974 | DE |
0 147 373 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0 194 958 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 326 040 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 371 620 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0 533 284 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 499 237 | May 1995 | EP |
0 561 566 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 670 602 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 664 942 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0 800 331 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 802 700 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 969 695 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 067 819 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 052 880 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 100 289 | Nov 2000 | EP |
59-105800 | Jun 1984 | JP |
60-074800 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60-146015 | Jan 1987 | JP |
10-136492 | May 1998 | JP |
6602799 | Sep 1967 | NL |
WO-8400662 | Feb 1984 | WO |
WO-8401683 | Apr 1984 | WO |
WO-8802208 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO-9522879 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9835530 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-0126413 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0163970 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0189264 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060093167 A1 | May 2006 | US |