The present invention relates generally to microplates that are typically used in the life sciences industry and more particularly to removable lids for sealing said microplates.
In the areas of biological, chemical and pharmaceutical research, it is a common practice to utilize microplates for storage and analytical purposes. Microplates (also commonly referred to in the art as multi-well plates, specimen plates and microtitre plates) have a block-shaped design and include a plurality of wells (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 384, 1536, etc.) in its top surface, each well serving as an individualized receptacle for retaining a particular specimen.
It is well known in the art to seal the top surface of conventional microplates in order to, among other things, minimize the risk of contamination, degradation, moisture absorption and/or evaporation of specimens retained within each well. Presently, there are a number of different means for sealing conventional microplates.
As an example, it is well known for a foil seal to be affixed to the top surface of a microplate using a thermally activated adhesive. In order to access a particular well in the microplate after the foil seal has been applied (e.g., to retrieve a specimen retained therein), a laboratory technician either manually removes (i.e., peels off) at least a portion of the foil seal or punctures the portion of the foil that directly covers the particular well using a separate seal-piercing instrument.
Although widely used in the art, the use of a foil seal to enclose a microplate introduces a number of notable shortcomings. As a first shortcoming, it has been found to be rather difficult to adhere a secondary foil layer on a microplate after the primary foil layer has been removed or pierced, thereby precluding reuse of the microplate, which is highly undesirable. As a second shortcoming, it has been found to be rather difficult to determine the exact location of an individual well in a high density microplate (e.g., microplates with at least 1536 wells) through the foil seal. Accordingly, prior to locating the selected well using the foil piercing instrument, a laboratory technician often accidentally pierces the portion of the foil seal which directly covers one or more neighboring wells, which is highly undesirable.
As another example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,534,014 to J. K. Mainquist et al, which is hereby incorporated by reference, there is disclosed a specimen plate lid that includes a sealing perimeter. In use, the lid is weighted so that when positioned on the specimen plate, the considerable weight of the lid compresses the seal against the sealing surface on the specimen plate.
Although known in the art, the lid described in the '014 patent suffers from two notable shortcomings. As a first shortcoming, the considerable weight associated with such a lid renders it difficult to use with most robots used in the life sciences market for picking and placing microtitre plates. As a second shortcoming, the footprint of such a lid is typically larger than the industry standard, thereby precluding its use with standard industry stackers, carousels and incubators.
As another example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,939,516 to J. P. Hall et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, there is disclosed a multi-well plate cover that includes a lid and a gasket. The lid is formed of a resilient material and configured to apply a compressive spring force to the surface of the gasket to seal the wells in a multi-well plate when the cover is secured to the multi-well plate. The lid has members for mechanical manipulation and for attachment to the multi-well plate.
Although known in the art, the lid described in the '516 patent suffers from a notable shortcoming. Specifically, the lid described in the '516 patent is mechanically complex in nature. As a result, such a lid requires complicated and expensive machinery to assist in its sealing/removal through automated means, which is highly undesirable.
Other patents of interest include U.S. Pat. No. 6,254,833 to C. Shumate et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,203 to S. Thompson et al., both of these references being incorporated herein by reference.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved microplate kit which includes a microplate shaped to include a plurality of wells and a removable lid for enclosing the plurality of wells.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a microplate kit as described above which further includes a tool for assisting in the removal of the lid from the microplate.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a microplate kit as described above which is reusable.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a microplate kit as described above which is both weighted and dimensioned for automated use.
It is yet still another object of the present invention to provide a microplate kit as described above includes a limited number of parts, which is easy to use and which is inexpensive to manufacture.
Accordingly, there is provided a microplate kit comprising (a) a microplate, the microplate comprising a sample area shaped to define a plurality of individual wells, and (b) a lid adapted to be mounted on the microplate to enclose the plurality of individual wells, (c) wherein at least one of the microplate and the lid is shaped to include an opening, (d) wherein the other of the microplate and the lid includes a projection dimensioned to project at least partially through the opening when the lid is mounted on the microplate.
Various other features and advantages will appear from the description to follow. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, an embodiment for practicing the invention. The embodiment will be described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The following detailed description is therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is best defined by the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are hereby incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts:
a) and 4(b) are front, top perspective and left end, top perspective views, respectively, of the microplate and lid shown in
a) and 5(b) are fragmentary section views of the microplate and lid shown in
a)-(c) are fragmentary section views of the microplate and lid shown in
a)-(d) are fragmentary section views of the microplate kit shown in
a)-(c) are fragmentary section views of the microplate and lid shown in
a)-(d) are fragmentary section views of the microplate kit shown in
Referring now to
Microplate kit 11 comprises a microplate 13, a lid 15 and a lid removal tool 17. As will be described in detail below, lid 15 is designed to be mounted on microplate 13. Tool 17 is designed to assist in the removal (i.e., or delidding) of lid 15 when mounted on microplate 13.
Referring now to
A hollow outer frame, or sidewall, 21 is formed directly around the periphery of sample area 18, sidewall 21 having an inverted U-shaped configuration in lateral cross-section (as seen most clearly in
Sidewall 21 is additionally shaped to define a plurality of vertically disposed openings, or holes, 29 in top surface 23, with one hole 29 located in each corner of sidewall 21, as seen most clearly in
As seen most clearly in
As seen most clearly in
As seen most clearly in
Referring back to
Gasket 47 is represented herein as having an O-ring style (i.e., an open rectangular configuration that extends along the periphery of plate 31). In this manner, each well 19 is sealed off from the outside environment but is remains in fluid communication with the remaining wells 19 in microplate 13, as seen most clearly in
Referring now to
Aligned as such, a downward force F is applied onto top surface 33 of lid 15 using manual or automated means, as shown in
As seen most clearly in
As can be appreciated, the particular design of lid 15 introduces a number of notable advantages over prior art methods of sealing microplates.
As a first benefit, microplate lid 15 is relatively inexpensive to manufacture. To the contrary, many well-known microplate lids and sealing methods use either expensive materials (e.g., metals) or have complex designs.
As a second benefit, the snap-fastening engagement means between microplate 13 and lid 15 renders the above-described lidding process easy to accomplish. Furthermore, because the above-described lidding process requires only (i) the proper orientation of lid 15 relative to microplate 13 and (ii) the application of a suitable force F onto lid 15, microplate 13 and lid 15 can be easily integrated into existing automated systems.
As a third benefit, the above-described design of lid 15 can be used in conjunction with a wide range of different microtitre plate sizes and densities, thereby increasing its range of potential applications.
As a fourth benefit, the particular design of lid 15 does not serve to increase the overall footprint (i.e., length and width) of the microplate 13, thereby rendering said components usable in most, if not all, preexisting automated systems.
As noted briefly above, tool 17 is designed to assist in the removal (i.e., or delidding) of lid 15 from microplate 13. Referring back to
Tool 17 additionally includes a plurality of support members, or posts, 57 which extend orthogonally away from top surface 53, posts 57 being located on base 51 in such a manner so that each post 57 coaxially aligns with a corresponding hole 29 in microplate 13, as will be described further below. It is to be understood that the free end of each post 57 is provided with an inwardly sloped, or concave, surface 59 which appears conical in lateral cross-section, as seen most clearly in
Referring now to
Aligned as such, microplate 13 is drawn down onto tool 17 until barbs 45-1 and 45-2 of each latch 39 directly contact concave surface 59 of a corresponding post 57 on tool 17, as shown in
As seen most clearly in
Referring now to
Microplate kit 111 is similar to microplate kit 11 in that microplate kit 111 comprises a microplate 113, a lid 115 designed to be removably mounted onto microplate 113 and a tool 117 designed to assist in the removal of lid 115 when mounted on microplate 113.
Referring now to
It should be noted that microplate 113 differs from microplate 13 principally in that (i) microplate 113 includes a higher density of wells 119 (notably, 1536 wells as opposed to 384 wells in microplate 13) and (ii) microplate 113 includes holes 129 which are generally rectangular in lateral cross-section (as opposed to the circular holes 29 in microplate 13).
As seen most clearly in
Lid 115 differs from lid 15 principally in that lid 115 comprises a plurality of vertical projections, or latches, 139 which are different in construction than latches 39. Specifically, each latch 139 is represented herein as being in the form of a single, deflectable arm 141 which extends orthogonally out from bottom surface 135 of plate 31, the free end of each arm 141 being shaped to include an enlarged engagement barb 143. In use, latches 139 operate in a similar manner as latches 39 in that latches are dimensioned to snap-mount through corresponding openings 129 in microplate 113, as will be described further in detail below.
As seen most clearly in
Referring now to
Aligned as such, a downward force is applied onto top surface 133 of lid 115. The downward force applied to lid 115 deflects each latch 139 inward to the extent necessary for its enlarged barb 143 to insert into its corresponding hole 129 in microplate 113, as seen in
Tool 117 functions in a similar manner as tool 17 in that tool 117 can be used to deflect latches 139 inward to the extent necessary so that lid 115 can be disengaged and subsequently removed from microplate 113. Referring back to
Referring now to
Aligned as such, microplate 113 is drawn down onto tool 117 until barb 143 of each latch 139 rests directly upon a support member 155. With microplate 113 supported by tool 117, handles 159 are pivoted inward (either manually or automatically) until fingers 161 abut against a thin outer wall 122 on microplate 113 that protrudes vertically up from the periphery of top surface 123, as shown in
The embodiments shown in the present invention are intended to be merely exemplary and those skilled in the art shall be able to make numerous variations and modifications without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/880,173, filed on Jan. 12, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
747181 | Jackson et al. | Dec 1903 | A |
4040234 | Stockdale et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4482182 | Mortensen | Nov 1984 | A |
4963493 | Daftsios | Oct 1990 | A |
5342581 | Sanadi | Aug 1994 | A |
5516490 | Sanadi | May 1996 | A |
5587321 | Smith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5741463 | Sanadi | Apr 1998 | A |
5842573 | Halvorsen | Dec 1998 | A |
5854065 | Livingston et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5910287 | Cassin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6021917 | Lovell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6171780 | Pham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6254833 | Shumate et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258325 | Sanadi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6426050 | Pham et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426215 | Sandell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436351 | Gubernator et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6486401 | Warhurst et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6534014 | Mainquist et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543203 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6602704 | Maxwell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6669911 | Swanson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6716350 | Olivier et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6825042 | Shumate et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6861035 | Pham et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896848 | Warhurst et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6918738 | Lafferty et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939516 | Hall et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20050019225 | Sanadi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070020152 | Costello, III et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070172395 | Lim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070258864 | Braymer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080193338 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60880173 | Jan 2007 | US |